On the Quality of HY-2A Scatterometer Winds

Similar documents
Evaluation of the HY-2A Scatterometer wind quality

Singularity analysis: A poweful technique for scatterometer wind data processing

RapidScat wind validation report

Satellite information on ocean vector wind from Scatterometer data. Giovanna De Chiara

Advancements in scatterometer wind processing

THE QUALITY OF THE ASCAT 12.5 KM WIND PRODUCT

A. Bentamy 1, S. A. Grodsky2, D.C. Fillon1, J.F. Piollé1 (1) Laboratoire d Océanographie Spatiale / IFREMER (2) Univ. Of Maryland

Climate-Quality Intercalibration of Scatterometer Missions

Algorithm Theoretical Basis Document for the OSI SAF wind products

Towards a consolidated wind reference for assessing scatterometer high and extreme-force wind capabilities

THE EFFECT OF RAIN ON ASCAT OBSERVATIONS OF THE SEA SURFACE RADAR CROSS SECTION USING SIMULTANEOUS 3-D NEXRAD RAIN MEASUREMENTS

On the quality of high resolution scatterometer winds

Wind scatterometers, the tropics and the ECMWF model

Modelled and observed winds in the Adriatic sea

First six months quality assessment of HY-2A SCAT wind products using in situ measurements

Assimilation of Scatterometer Winds at Météo-France

IMPROVEMENTS IN THE USE OF SCATTEROMETER WINDS IN THE OPERATIONAL NWP SYSTEM AT METEO-FRANCE

Algorithm Theoretical Basis Document for the OSI SAF wind products. Ocean and Sea Ice SAF

SeaWinds wind Climate Data Record validation report

The Ice Contamination Ratio Method: Accurately Retrieving Ocean Winds Closer to the Sea Ice Edge While Eliminating Ice Winds

Validation of 12.5 km Resolution Coastal Winds. Barry Vanhoff, COAS/OSU Funding by NASA/NOAA

Reprocessed QuikSCAT (V04) Wind Vectors with Ku-2011 Geophysical Model Function

Wind Observations EUMETSAT OSI SAF EUMETSAT NWP SAF EU CMEMS OSI TAC EU MyWave EU NORSEWInD ESA esurge ESA GlobCurrent ESA Aeolus

Study of an Objective Performance Measure for Spaceborne Wind Sensors

Cross-Calibrating OSCAT Land Sigma-0 to Extend the QuikSCAT Land Sigma-0 Climate Record

ScatSat-1 wind Product User Manual

RapidScat wind Product User Manual

SENSOR SYNERGY OF ACTIVE AND PASSIVE MICROWAVE INSTRUMENTS FOR OBSERVATIONS OF MARINE SURFACE WINDS

Coastal Scatterometer Winds Working Group

Aquarius Sca+erometer Calibra3on

Validation of KNW atlas with scatterometer winds (Phase 3 of KNW project)

SMAP Radiometer-Only Tropical Cyclone Size and Strength

Oceansat-2 Wind Product User Manual

WIND BIAS CORRECTION GUIDE. General. Introduction. Ad Stoffelen and Jur Vogelzang KNMI. Version 1.1 Apr 2014

SATELLITE wind scatterometer instruments are active remote

ON THE USE OF DOPPLER SHIFT FOR SAR WIND RETRIEVAL

Characterization of ASCAT measurements based on buoy and QuikSCAT wind vector observations

SIMON YUEH, WENQING TANG, ALEXANDER FORE, AND JULIAN CHAUBELL JPL-CALTECH, PASADENA, CA, USA GARY LAGERLOEF EARTH AND SPACE RESEARCH, SEATTLE, WA, US

Institut Français pour la Recherche et l Exploitation de la MER

The RSS WindSat Version 7 All-Weather Wind Vector Product

Monitoring Conditions Offshore with Satellites

TRMM TMI and AMSR-E Microwave SSTs

PRELIMINARY STUDY ON DEVELOPING AN L-BAND WIND RETRIEVAL MODEL FUNCTION USING ALOS/PALSAR

ERS-1/2 Scatterometer new products: mission reprocessing and data quality improvement

The technical support for global validation of ERS Wind and Wave Products at ECMWF

Jackie May* Mark Bourassa. * Current affilitation: QinetiQ-NA

Sentinel-1A Ocean Level-2 Products Validation Strategy

Aquarius Wind Speed Retrievals and Implica6ons for SMAP Ocean Vector Winds

High resolution wind retrieval for SeaWinds

OAFlux: global, 0.25, daily

Impact of the loss of QuikSCAT on National Hurricane Center operations: Current mitigation efforts and future plans

Comparison of C-Band Scatterometer CMOD5.N Equivalent Neutral Winds with ECMWF

Towards an Optimal Inversion Method. for SAR Wind Retrieval 1

OCEAN vector winds from the SeaWinds instrument have

WaMoS II Wave Monitoring System

ASCAT Level 2 Soil Moisture Reprocessing Phase 1 - Dataset Description

Assessment and Analysis of QuikSCAT Vector Wind Products for the Gulf of Mexico: A Long-Term and Hurricane Analysis

Scatterometer data interpretation: Estimation and validation of the transfer function CMOD4

The Cross-Calibrated Multi-Platform (CCMP) Ocean Vector Wind Analysis (V2.0)

Validation of 12.5 km and Super-High Resolution (2-5 km)

DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF A SAR WIND EMULATOR

CMOD5.N: A C-band geophysical model function for equivalent neutral wind

Application of OSVW to Determine Wave Generation Areas

Introduction EU-Norsewind

HIGH RESOLUTION WIND RETRIEVAL FOR SEAWINDS ON QUIKSCAT. Jeremy B. Luke. A thesis submitted to the faculty of. Brigham Young University

Scatterometer-Based Assessment of 10-m Wind Analyses from the Operational ECMWF and NCEP Numerical Weather Prediction Models

Wind Stress Working Group 2015 IOVWST Meeting Portland, OR

Combining wind and rain in spaceborne scatterometer observations: modeling the splash effects in the sea surface backscattering coefficient

Quantifying variance due to temporal and spatial difference between ship and satellite winds

On the assimilation of SAR wave spectra of S-1A in the wave model MFWAM

Development of SAR-Derived Ocean Surface Winds at NOAA/NESDIS

Field assessment of ocean wind stress derived from active and passive microwave sensors

EVALUATION OF ENVISAT ASAR WAVE MODE RETRIEVAL ALGORITHMS FOR SEA-STATE FORECASTING AND WAVE CLIMATE ASSESSMENT

Aquarius / SMAP Ocean Roughness and SSS

ENVISAT WIND AND WAVE PRODUCTS: MONITORING, VALIDATION AND ASSIMILATION

Toward an optimal inversion method for synthetic aperture radar wind retrieval

Oceansat-2 and RAMA buoy winds: A comparison

Technical report. Ifremer, DRO/OS, Plouzané, FRANCE. NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center, Wallops Island, Virginia, USA.

Statistics of wind and wind power over the Mediterranean Sea

JET PROPULSION LABORATORY INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM

Dynamics and variability of surface wind speed and divergence over mid-latitude ocean fronts

HIGH RESOLUTION WIND AND WAVE MEASUREMENTS FROM TerraSAR-X IN COMPARISON TO MARINE FORECAST

Evaluating the impact of ocean gravity wave variability on Aquarius satellite measurements. D. Vandemark, H. Feng Univ. of New Hampshire/EOS

A comparison of a two-dimensional variational analysis method and a median filter for NSCAT ambiguity removal

Ocean Wave Forecasting at ECMWF

GLOBAL VALIDATION AND ASSIMILATION OF ENVISAT ASAR WAVE MODE SPECTRA

Examining the Impact of Surface Currents on Satellite Scatterometer and Altimeter Ocean Winds

Assessment of the ASCAT wind error characteristics by global dropwindsonde observations

IOVWST Wind Stress Working Group May 29, 2014

Ocean Wave Forecasting

Review of Equivalent Neutral Winds and Stress

Deborah K. Smith, Frank J. Wentz, and Carl A. Mears Remote Sensing Systems

ERS WAVE MISSION REPROCESSING- QC SUPPORT ENVISAT MISSION EXTENSION SUPPORT

The relevance of ocean surface current in the ECMWF analysis and forecast system. Hans Hersbach Jean-Raymond Bidlot

Satellite Observations of Equatorial Planetary Boundary Layer Wind Shear

Scatterometer Data Interpretation: Measurement Space and Inversion

FULL-WAVEFORM INVERSION

Satellite Air Sea Fluxes

Evaluation of Marine Surface Winds Observed by SeaWinds and AMSR on ADEOS-II

Marine Renewables Industry Association. Marine Renewables Industry: Requirements for Oceanographic Measurements, Data Processing and Modelling

Transcription:

On the Quality of HY-2A Scatterometer Winds W. Lin (ICM-CSIC) M. Portabella (ICM-CSIC) A. Stoffelen (KNMI) A. Verhoef (KNMI) Youguang Zhang (NSOAS) Mingsen Lin (NSOAS) Shuyan Lang (NSOAS) Juhong Zou (NSOAS)

Outline 1. HY-2A scatterometer (HSCAT) Level 2 processed at ICM- CSIC (Spain) with KNMI s Pencil-beam Wind Processor (PenWP) 2. Ku-band QC approach based on ASCAT QC (MLE and SE) 3. TMI collocated rain data used to tune the HSCAT QC 4. Validation with ECMWF, buoy, ASCAT and RSCAT winds 5. Conclusions

L2 processing The HSCAT Level 2A backscatter data from NSOAS have been processed using the EUMETSAT Numerical Weather Prediction (NWP) Satellite Application Facility (SAF) Pencil-beam scatterometer Wind Processor (PenWP): Numerical ocean calibration (NOC) Multiple solution scheme (MSS) Inversion residual (MLE-) based quality control Two-dimensional variational (2D-VAR) ambiguity removal (AR) scheme. In addition, ICM develops Singularity analysis based quality control

Datasets The HSCAT Level 2A backscatter data from NSOAS (July 2012- June 2014 + April 27-May 6, 2015); HSCAT L1B backscatter data (July 2014- April 2015), coming soon Collocated ECMWF (for the same period) Collocated TMI rain rate (July - December 2012) < 30 min; < 25 km (only high latitudes, i.e. Lat < 40 ) Collocated buoy winds (July 2012-June 2013) < 5 min; <25 km (low & mid latitudes) Collocated ASCAT winds (July August 2012) < 25 min; < 25 km (only high latitudes, i.e. Lat > 60 ) Collocated RSCAT (April 27 May 5, 2015) < 5 min; <25 km (low & mid latitudes) Other ancillary data used, e.g., MSG rain data

Quality indicators and quality control 50 45 40 Rain free data (2924429 WVCs) Rain below 1 mm/hr (201147 WVCs) Rain between 1 and 2 mm/hr (47162 WVCs) Rain between 2 and 3 mm/hr (21499 WVCs) Rain between 3 and 4 mm/hr (11986 WVCs) Rain between 4 and 5 mm/hr (7711 WVCs) Rain between 5 and 6 mm/hr (5517 WVCs) Rain above 6 mm/hr (14361 WVCs) 35 Normalized histogram(%) 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 MLE Histogram of HSCAT MLE (Left) and singularity exponent SE (Right) at different TMI rain conditions

TMI-RR VRMS Mean TMI rain rate as a function of SE and MLE VMRS difference between HSCAT and ECMWF as a function of SE and MLE Threshold definition: p(rr SE) > 40% & p(rr MLE) > 40% This method is applied for the different across-track WVCs and wind speed regimes

A typical case HSCAT wind retrieved wind field using (Left) the standard inversion output (cost function minima) and the median filter AR; Poor performance particularly at low winds (Right) the multiple solution scheme and 2D- VAR AR. The acquisition date is January 3rd 2013 at about 6:00 UTC. The contour lines show the MSG rain rate (see the legend) MLE plots below

Frequent missing values at nadir??? Check L1B data soon MLE-orig MLE-mean (Left) The MLE distribution of the above case, wind retrieval using PenWP; (Right) The mean MLE distribution (weighted averaged from the centered 3x3 box) associated with the left panel.

wind speed SE (Left) The wind speed distribution, wind retrieval using PenWP; (Right) The singularity map (SE values) of this case

HSCAT QC rejections Total flag ratio = 7.1% HSCAT QC-rejection ratio (MLE/SE-based QC) @ Dec. 2013, high rejection @ coastal areas and North Atlantic ocean

OSCAT QC rejections Total flag ratio = 7.4% OSCAT QC-rejection ratio (PenWP QC) @ Dec. 2013

HSCAT minus ECMWF wind speeds HSCAT wind speed bias w.r.t. ECMWF @ Dec. 2013, only QC-accepted data are studied

OSCAT minus ECMWF wind speeds OSCAT wind speed bias w.r.t. ECMWF @ Dec. 2013, only QC-accepted data are studied

Total QC ratio: 8.1% 7.1% 7.4% Speed bias High HSCAT rejection ratio (Left) HSCAT QC rejection ratio as a function of Latitude; (Right) HSCAT wind speed bias w.r.t. ECMWF as a function of latitude, only QC-accepted data are studied

HSCAT versus buoy winds Time_diff < 5 minutes Space_diff< 25 km (the closest) N_total = 19,453; Rejection = 8.5% (high rejection due to the buoy location above Lat=40 ); Accept = 91.5% spd_bias spd_sd Dir_bias Dir_SD u_sd v_sd HSCAT vs buoy point measurements Reject 0.56 2.27 0.3 34.1 3.61 4.13 Accept -0.06 1.10 1.4 17.4 1.58 1.61

HSCAT wind versus 10-min buoy wind QC- accept Wind direction stats only for (mean) winds > 3 m/s speed direction Calibration issues QC- reject Too many QCed WVCs along the diagonal; further QC tuning is needed!

HSCAT wind versus ECMWF wind QC- accept Wind direction stats only for (mean) winds > 3 m/s speed direction Calibration issues QC- reject QCed WVCS: larger discrepancies w.r.t. ECMWF than w.r.t. buoy (expected)

buoy HSCAT ECMWF u v u v u v scaling fact 1.0 1.0 0.89 0.92 1.05 1.10 bias factor 0.0 0.0 0.25 0.01 0.65 0.12 SD error (NWP scale) SD error (SCAT scale) TC analysis, QC-rejected. r 2 =0.65 2.6 2.8 1.7 1.5 1.5 1.6 2.4 2.7 1.5 1.3 1.7 1.8 TC analysis, QC-accepted. r 2 =0.16 buoy HSCAT ECMWF u v u v u v scaling fact 1.0 1.0 0.99 0.97 1.01 1.04 bias factor 0.0 0.0 0.06-0.07 0.17 0.02 SD error (NWP scale) SD error (SCAT scale) 1.29 1.31 0.79 0.72 1.04 1.05 1.23 1.25 0.69 0.60 1.11 1.13

HSCAT versus ASCAT winds All of the HSCAT-ASCAT collocations are over high latitude ( Lat >60 ) (HY-2A descending local time: 6 a.m., MetOp descending local time 9:30 a.m.) Total number of RSCAT-HSCAT collocations=549,468 (Sea ice exclued) HSCAT-accept HSCAT- reject ASCAT-accept 92.30% (C1) 7.46% (C2) ASCAT-reject 0.16% (C3) 0.08% (C4) Time_diff < 30 minutes Space_diff< 25 km (the closest)

HSCAT versus ASCAT winds C1: ASCAT-accepted HSCAT-accepted

HSCAT versus ASCAT winds HSCAT-ECMWF ASCAT-ECMWF C1: ASCAT-accepted HSCAT-accepted

HSCAT versus ASCAT winds C2: ASCAT-accepted HSCAT-rejected

HSCAT versus ASCAT winds HSCAT-ECMWF ASCAT-ECMWF C2: ASCAT-accepted HSCAT-rejected

HSCAT versus RapidSCAT winds RSCAT-HSCAT, speed bias RSCAT-HSCAT, speed SD

HSCAT versus RapidSCAT winds C1: RapidSCAT QC accepted, HSCAT QC accepted

HSCAT versus RapidSCAT winds HSCAT vs ECMWF RSCAT vs ECMWF C1: RapidSCAT QC accepted, HSCAT QC accepted

HSCAT winds retrieved by PenWP are of very good quality Mean MLE and SE well correlate with rain & wind variability, and can be used for HSCAT QC. Remaining issues: Conclusions WVC irregular grid (nadir swath) Lack of low winds Sigma0/wind calibration, only at high lats? High-latitude rejection ratio QC improvement Many thanks to NSOAS for providing HY-2A sigma0 data!

QC- accept u v HSCAT wind versus 10-min buoy point measurements For the statistics of wind direction, only the mean winds above 3m/s are considered u QC- reject v Too many wind along the diagonal are rejected, the thresholds of those QC indicators should be tuned to improve HSCAT quality control.

QC- accept u v HSCAT wind versus ECMWF wind For the statistics of wind direction, only the mean winds above 3m/s are considered u QC- reject v Too many wind along the diagonal are rejected, the thresholds of those QC indicators should be tuned to improve HSCAT quality control.

HSCAT versus RapidScat winds

HSCAT versus RapidScat winds Within the collocated RSCAT and HSCAT data, PenWP over qualitycontrolled HSCAT data (12%), comparing to RSCAT QC (8%). The HSCAT QC flag is re-developed to produce equivalent QC ratio with RSCAT. Time_diff < 5 minutes -0.6 db NOC is applied to HSCAT Space_diff< 25 km (the closest) Total number of RSCAT-HSCAT collocations=386,153 (Sea ice exclued) HSCAT-accept HSCAT- reject RapidSCAT-accept 87.2% (C1) 4.5% (C2) RapidSCAT-reject 4.7% (C3) 3.6% (C4) Density plot of RSCAT-HSCAT collocations, 2 x2 (minimu N=10)

HSCAT versus RapidSCAT winds C2: RapidSCAT QC accepted, HSCAT QC Rejected

HSCAT versus RapidSCAT winds HSCAT vs ECMWF RSCAT vs ECMWF C2: RapidSCAT QC accepted, HSCAT QC Rejected

HSCAT versus RapidSCAT winds C3: RapidSCAT QC Rejected, HSCAT QC accepted

HSCAT versus RapidSCAT winds HSCAT vs ECMWF RSCAT vs ECMWF C3: RapidSCAT QC Rejected, HSCAT QC accepted

HSCAT versus RapidSCAT winds C4: RapidSCAT QC Rejected, HSCAT QC accepted

HSCAT versus RapidSCAT winds HSCAT vs ECMWF RSCAT vs ECMWF C4: RapidSCAT QC Rejected, HSCAT QC accepted

Rapidscat - ASCAT speeds November thru March Collocated ASCAT-B

Speed and QC 90% RAIN 9.4% RAIN RSCAT ASCAT RSCAT ASCAT ASCAT RSCAT ASCAT 0.3% 0.3% RAIN RAIN RSCAT ASCAT RSCAT ASCAT ASCAT RSCAT ASCAT