Nanaimo Transportation Master Plan. Phase 1 Consultation Summary

Similar documents
Pre-Plan Consultation Summary

Engagement Summary: Round 1

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT IN SMITHS FALLS, ONTARIO; A COMPARISON BETWEEN TWO SITES

Agency Advisory Group Meeting #3 and Walk Audit Anchorage Non-Motorized Plan

City of Wilsonville 5 th Street to Kinsman Road Extension Project

Chapter 7. Transportation. Transportation Road Network Plan Transit Cyclists Pedestrians Multi-Use and Equestrian Trails

Welcome! Public Open House on UBC s Transportation Plan

CITY OF ABBOTSFORD TRANSPORTATION AND TRANSIT MASTER PLAN

MASTER BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN PLAN

Chapter 5. Complete Streets and Walkable Communities.

Cecil County, Maryland. Bicycle Master Plan

CONNECTING PEOPLE TO PLACES

City of Hamilton s Transportation Master Plan (TMP) Public Consultation 3 December 2015

Cyclists and Bikeways: What s your match? A guide to bikeway options for a variety of cyclists

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Vision

CHAPTER 3: Vision Statement and Goals

Proposed Bridge Street East Bicycle Lanes Public Open House Thursday, April 27, 2017

BETHEL ROAD AND SEDGWICK ROAD CORRIDOR STUDY

Centennial Neighbourhoods Transportation Management Plan Summary of Phase 1 Consultation. Overview of Issues

West Village Mobility & Integration

CITY OF COCOA BEACH 2025 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. Section VIII Mobility Element Goals, Objectives, and Policies

Moving Ahead. (Community Engagement) Chapter Three

Hamilton Transportation Master Plan Public Consultation. Public Information Centre One Summary

Corridor Vision Workshop Summary James Madison Elementary February 22,2018

NEWMARKET CENTRE Mobility Hub Profile

University of Victoria Campus Cycling Plan Terms of Reference. 1.0 Project Description

Tonight is for you. Learn everything you can. Share all your ideas.

Appendix A-K Public Information Centre 2 Materials

TRANSPORTATION NEEDS ASSESSMENT

Key objectives of the survey were to gain a better understanding of:

Byron Avenue. Public Meeting. Thursday June 16, Traffic Calming Design Sherbourne Road to Island Park Drive

Speed Limits Study and Proposal. Public Input Session: 8/14/13

Shifting Gears for a Healthier City.

NOTES FROM JUNIOR COUNCIL ORIENTATION SESSION HELD ON MONDAY, JANUARY 22, 2018, AT 3:30 PM IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL

Tuesday, September 25 th Mount Holly Municipal Complex 400 East Central Avenue 5:30pm to 7:30pm. Activity Stations o Where do you Live?

North End Traffic Management Study

McKenzie Interchange Project Fall 2015 Engagement. Appendix 2: Engagement Materials and Feedback Form

Tulsa Metropolitan Area LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN

TOWN OF WILLIAMSTON, SC BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN MASTER PLAN TOWN OF WILLIAMSTON, SC BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN MASTER PLAN

DON MILLS-EGLINTON Mobility Hub Profile

Rhode Island Moving Forward Long-Range Transportation Plan 2040 Municipal Roundtable Providence County

-Current Get On Board initiative: Existing LTC program to help make LTC accessible, informative, and encourage use of public transit

Moving Cambridge. City of Cambridge Transportation Master Plan Public Consultation Centre. March 7, :00 8:00 PM.

DON MILLS-SHEPPARD Mobility Hub Profile

IBI Group November 5, 2012

ABOUT THIS STUDY The Tenderloin-Little Saigon Community-Based Transportation Plan

Rhode Island Moving Forward Long-Range Transportation Plan 2040 Municipal Roundtable Newport County

Downtown Naples Mobility and Connectivity Study. Naples City Council Presentation January 2017

Complete Streets. Designing Streets for Everyone. Sarnia

Solana Beach Comprehensive Active Transportation Strategy (CATS)

River Road - Proposed Road Safety Enhancement Measures

Bikeway action plan. Bicycle Friendly Community Workshop March 5, 2007 Rochester, MN

CENTENNIAL NEIGHBOURHOODS SECONDARY PLAN STUDY CITY OF HAMILTON SPECIFIC MAP COMMENTS FROM DECEMBER 1st PUBLIC INFORMATION CENTRE #2

Canada s Capital Region Delegation to the Velo-City Global 2010 Conference

Tunnel Reconstruction South 5 th Street Association October 16, 2018

PRINCE GEORGE S PLAZA METRO AREA PEDESTRIAN PLAN

City of Perth Cycle Plan 2029

Building a Liveable Ottawa 2031 Backgrounder 5: Barrhaven/Riverside South/Leitrim

Kelowna On the Move. Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan

Transportation & Land Use. Workshop: March 6, 2013

Prepared For: Shieldbay Developments Inc. c/o Matson, McConnell Ltd. 2430A Bloor Street West Toronto, Ontario M6S 1P9.

APPENDIX A. Outreach Summary

Public Event 1 Community Workshops

Getting Your SRTS Project Funded. Ryan Snyder

City of Birmingham Draft Multi-modal Transportation Plan

VISION Long Range Plan Update Board Workshop. February 10, 2016

WELCOME. City of Greater Sudbury. Transportation Demand Management Plan

1

HARRISON STREET/OAKLAND AVENUE COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION PLAN

APPENDIX E Needs Assessment

Sixth Line Development - Transit Facilities Plan

A CHANGING CITY. of Edmonton, it is essential that it reflects the long-term vision of the City.

MEETING OF THE CITY OF CONCORD BICYCLE, PEDESTRIAN AND SAFE ROUTES TO TRANSIT PLAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA

Agenda. Overview PRINCE GEORGE S PLAZA METRO AREA PEDESTRIAN PLAN

2014 Review/2015 Business Plan

Bicycle Friendly Niagara Falls

Cycling Master Plan Community Engagement Session WELCOME

Transportation Master Plan Advisory Task Force

Toronto Complete Streets Guidelines

Typical Rush Hour Commute. PennyforTransportation.com

Governance and Priorities Committee Report For the July 2, 2015 Meeting

WELCOME! To the Centennial Neighbourhoods Secondary Plan and Transportation Management Plan Information Centre. City of Hamilton

Perryville TOD and Greenway Plan

Welcome to the McKenzie Interchange Project Open House!

AGENDA ITEM NO. 5b HCAOG TAC meeting of May 8, 2014

MARKET/JFK VISION ZERO PILOT PROJECT FEBRUARY 2019 EVALUATION REPORT

AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY SPECIAL AGENDA ITEM NO. _1A_

Hennepin County Bicycle and Pedestrian Planning

COASTAL RAIL TRAIL ROSE CREEK BIKEWAY PROJECT COMMUNITY WORKSHOP #2 AUGUST 15, 2013

What are the Qualities that make Newark a Bicycle Friendly Community? What are aspects that make Newark less Bicycle Friendly?

El Paso County 2040 Major Transportation Corridors Plan

Plant City Walk-Bike Plan

We support the following: Tom Davies Square 200 Brady Street Sudbury, Ontario

Central Oregon Intergovernmental Council

Omaha s Complete Streets Policy

Nanaimo Transportation Master Plan

Perryville Transit Oriented Development & Greenway Plan

City of Charlottesville Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Update

2014/2015 BIKE ROUTE PLAN 83 AVENUE PROTECTED BIKE LANE

CITY OF BLOOMINGTON COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

Transcription:

Nanaimo Transportation Master Plan Phase 1 Consultation Summary Transportation Advisory Committee Meeting Wednesday December 12, 2012

Agenda Study Update Phase 1 Consultation Process Phase 1 Consultation Findings Next Steps 2

3 1. STUDY UPDATE

Study Process 4

Communications & Consultation Council Social Media Stakeholder Workshops Surveys NTMP TAC Meetings Public Open Houses TWG Meetings 5

2. CONSULTATION PROCESS 6

Phase 1 Consultation Open House x2 Wellington Secondary School (Tue Oct 30) Port Place Mall (Sat Nov 10) Stakeholder Workshop Beban Park Recreation Centre (Thu Nov 8) Social Media Outreach Facebook Twitter Online Survey (PlaceSpeak) October November 2012 7

Open House #1 Tuesday, October 30 th Wellington Secondary School Relatively low attendance 8

Open House #2 Saturday, November 10 th Port Place Mall About 150 people viewed the boards, one-third provided direct feedback, busy. 9

Stakeholder Workshop Thursday, November 8 th Beban Park Recreation Centre 60 attendees 10

Neighbourhood Associations Brechin Hill Community Assn College Park Neighbourhood Assn Departure Bay Neighbourhood Assn Dover Community Assn Harewood Neighbourhood Assn Nanaimo Old City Assn Neighbours of Nob Hill Newcastle Neighbourhood Assn Parkwood Neighbourhood Assn South End Community Assn Stephenson Point Neighbourhood Assn Western Neighbourhood Assn Community Groups Access Nanaimo Caring about Townsite Society Downtown Nanaimo Business Improvement Assn Greater Nanaimo Cycling Coalition (GNCC) Hub City Cycles Community Coop Mid Island Velo Assn Nanaimo Area Land Trust Nanaimo Carshare Nanaimo Chamber of Commerce Young Professionals of Nanaimo Agencies Island Corridor Foundation Ministry of Transportation & Infrastructure Nanaimo Airport Nanaimo Port Authority RDN Transit Nanaimo Regional General Hospital (VIHA RCMP RDN Transit Regional District of Nanaimo School District #68 District of Lantzville Vancouver Island University VIHA Parking Coordinator VIU Student Union 11

Social Media Announcements on Facebook & Twitter 12

Online Survey Nearly 1,400 unique views 187 signed up 153 surveys completed 11% response / view rate typical of PlaceSpeak experience 13

3. CONSULTATION FINDINGS 14

Online Survey Results Neighbourhood Representation Number of Responses 25 21 20 19 18 15 11 10 5 9 8 7 7 7 7 6 6 5 5 5 4 3 3 2 0 15

Online Survey Results Neighbourhood Representation 88% of respondents are Nanaimo residents All neighbourhoods represented Higher number of responses from central neighbourhoods 16

Online Survey Results Age Distribution Percentage of Respondents 25% 23% 20% 15% 10% 5% 19% 19% 14% 14% 14% 14% 18% 18% 18% 18% 12% Young adult / young family age groups overrepresented Seniors underrepresented 0% 15-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65 or over Age Group % of Respondents % of Total Population 15 years old and older 17

# Responses Online Survey Results Respondent Composition 140 120 100 80 60 40 116 48 Majority of NTMP survey respondents are Nanaimo residents High number of students responded 20 15 0 I am a resident of Nanaimo I am a student I am a business owner in Nanaimo 18

Percentage of Respondents Online Survey Results Respondent Housing Types 80% Respondents living in single family homes over-represented Respondents living in apartments underrepresented Basement suites in other category 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 69% 59% 21% 13% 13% 7% 5% 4% 1% 8% Age Group % of Respondents % of Total Population 19

Online Survey Results Vehicle Ownership Over a third of residents own one vehicle, and nearly half own more than one car Almost one-fifth of respondents did not own a car (8% in HHTS) Proportions of 1 vs 2 vs 3 vehicles similar to HHTS Nearly 75% of respondents own a bicycle 3 or more 15% None 17% 2 vehicles 33% 1 vehicle 35% 20

Online Survey Results Respondents Travel Patterns Walking Cycling Transit Carpool Daily 42% 15% 22% 7% 2-3 times a week 22% 15% 15% 24% 2-3 times a month 27% 23% 19% 30% Never 10% 48% 44% 39% 21

Online Survey Results Respondents Trip Purpose Walking Cycling Transit Carpool Commute 26% 40% 64% 46% Shopping 16% 14% 23% 14% Recreation 15% 25% 1% 25% Exercise 41% 17% N/A N/A Other 2% 4% 12% 2% 22

Online Survey Results Transportation Priorities - #1 Priority 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 7% 6% 21% 14% 17% 2% 5% 8% 10% 11% 15% Local Streets Other Land Use and Transportation Integration Major Roads Pedestrian Bicycle Priorities similar to Pre-Plan Consultation (transit and walking highest priorities) Land use and major roads were higher priorities in Pre-Plan Consultation 30% 20% 11% 49% Transit 10% 24% 0% Pre-Plan Consultation Phase 1 Consultation 23

Lowest Priority <--- Highest Priority Online Survey Results Transportation Priorities Weighted Priorities For residents, transit is the top priority, followed by the pedestrian and bicycle network Major roads are a more prominent priority for nonresidents Transit Pedestrian Bicycle Rail / Ferry / Air Land Use and Transportation Major Roads Local Streets Residents Non Residents Note: Non-resident results based on 17 responses 24

Lowest Priority Highest Priority Online Survey Results Transportation Priorities Transit Pedestrian Bicycle Rail / Ferry / Air Land Use and Transportation Integration Major Roads Local Streets City Centre VIU North South Central All Residents Overall relative priorities are similar in all areas Transit higher priority in City Centre and South Nanaimo Major Roads higher priority in North and Central Nanaimo 25

Online Survey Results Walking What factors discourage you from walking more? 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 Destinations too far Traffic concerns Narrow sidewalks / incomplete Need to transport kids etc. Surrounding environment unsafe Dangerous crossings Physical impairment Residents Non Residents 26

Online Survey Results Walking What factors discourage you from walking more? 120 100 80 Land Use Traffic / Safety Other 60 40 20 0 Destinations too far Traffic concerns Narrow sidewalks / incomplete Need to transport kids etc. Surrounding environment unsafe Dangerous crossings Physical impairment Residents Non Residents 27

Consultation Summary Walking Issues Destinations too far away to walk. More walking pathways and sidewalks Poor quality / uneven sidewalks Sidewalk accessibility for wheelchairs and strollers Safer routes and more walkable neighbourhoods Safety at crossings / intersections 28

Consultation Summary Walking Opportunities 29 Focus on existing dense areas and increase density in new/existing neighbourhoods. Complete network of sidewalks Better quality / maintained sidewalks More short-cuts / neighbourhood connections Safer routes to school Pedestrian friendly streets and neighbourhoods Extend E&N south.

Online Survey Results Cycling What factors discourage you from cycling more? 100 Residents 80 Non Residents 60 40 20 0 30

Online Survey Results Cycling What factors discourage you from cycling more? 100 80 60 Land Use Traffic / Safety End-of-trip facilities Other 40 20 0 31

Consultation Summary Cycling Issues More on-street bike lanes, bicycle paths Safer bike routes Network coverage and connectivity Unsafe roadways for cyclists due to traffic volumes & speeds Debris Clearly identified bike infrastructure 32

Consultation Summary Cycling Opportunities More bicycle network coverage Dedicated bike facilities i.e. bike lanes, paved shoulders, separated bike lanes Complete and connected bike routes Enforcement Multi-use trails 33

Number of Responses Online Survey Results Transit What factors discourage you from taking transit more? 120 100 80 60 Residents Non Residents 40 20 0 34

Number of Responses Online Survey Results Transit What factors discourage you from taking transit more? 120 100 80 Land Use Transit Service Other 60 40 20 0 35

Consultation Summary Transit Issues Infrequent and unreliable service Long transit headways Poor evening and weekend service Slow busses, travel time not competitive with driving Underserved areas (Departure Bay Ferry terminal, Duke Point, Airport, south Nanaimo) More regional connections (Parksville, Lantzville, Ladysmith) 36

Consultation Summary Transit Opportunities Increased evening and weekend service Higher service frequency Smaller shuttle busses More network coverage across the City Integration of bus and ferry schedule More service to Vancouver Island University, implement U-Pass Future rapid / rail transit Regional service connections 37

Consultation Summary Major Road Issues Increasing road congestion Too many traffic signals (i.e. Island Highway) Car-oriented development Safer intersections Parking pressures (VIU, residential areas) Network connections between Hammond Bay area and rest of City Traffic flow East west routes 38

Consultation Summary Major Road Opportunities Intersection improvements on Island Highway Better traffic management for ferry traffic Road safety Enforcement Provide more attractive transportation alternatives to car use, such as improved transit service and safer walking/cycling routes 39

Consultation Summary Local Road Issues Short-cutting through neighbourhoods Truck traffic on local roads Neighbourhood livability Speeding 40

Consultation Summary Local Road Opportunities Traffic calming measures Traffic circles Speed humps Other design treatments 41

Consultation Summary External Connections Ferry Fast-ferry connections Cheaper options for ferry travel Transit Rail Connections between Airport & Downtown Integration with ferry schedule More regional service to Parksville, Qualicum Beach, Lantzville, Duncan Connections to Victoria, Comox, Courtenay 42

Online Survey Results NTMP Guiding Principles Lowest ---- Highest Priority What are the most important draft NTMP principles? Safe Maintain Mobility Accessible Connected Reduced Environmental Impact Affordable 43

Online Survey Results NTMP Guiding Principles Survey respondents were asked if the guiding principles reflect the City s transportation system, and if anything is missing? Overall consensus with the guiding principles Address an emphasis on people, not vehicles More focus on promoting alternative transportation Incorporate a focus on transit service into principles More clarity on what safety for the network means 44

Study Process 45

Nanaimo Transportation Master Plan Phase 1 Consultation Summary Transportation Advisory Committee Meeting December 12, 2012