LSU AgCenter Northeast Research Station

Similar documents
Tidewater Ag. Res. & Ext. Ctr.

(12 08 CRRLL-12 BAY DLL Capreno) Site Description Northeast Research & Extension Center

(04 08 CRR-04 DUP USA Prequel North Pivot) Site Description Northeast Research & Extension Center

Viscosity Agents vs. Invert Emulsions for Glyphosate Efficacy.

2. There was not any statistical difference between treatments

Loveland Glyphosate Adjuvant Study.

North Carolina State University

Southern Illinois University BOLT Technology Herbicide Programs - Southern USA.

LSU AgCenter. Water-Seeded Variety Tolerance to Command at PEGGING

(09 SLL-1 Liberty Link SB) Site Description Page 1 of 13 Northeast Research & Extension Center

Comparison of MON76980 (Xtendimax) and Liberty Herbicide Systems for weed control in Soybeans at Rochester, MN in SUMMARY:

North Carolina State University

IR-4 Ornamental Horticulture Program Research Report Cover Sheet

Sep (Dollar spot fungicide Trial 2012) Site Description Page 1 of 14 University of California, Riverside

General Trial Information

(BENT3) Site Description Page 1 of 6 University of GA Coop Ext Service Evaluation of 1,3-D on Golf Course Putting Greens: Creeping Bentgrass

2012 WEED SCIENCE ANNUAL REPORT

2003 RUTGERS Turfgrass Proceedings

PAGE #1 TRIAL # US 828/01/ : PSOYGLYP* 01/25/2002 APPLICATIONS

Table 1. Key plant indicators observed during the study period. 75% green-up 100% green-up. Annual bluegrass 75% boot 16 April

Madison, WI Page 1

Is Ground Rolling For You? Jodi DeJong-Hughes Regional Extension Educator, Marshall cell

IR-4 FIELD DATA BOOK

Charles T. Golob, William J. Johnston, and Karine Paré Dept. Crop and Soil Sciences Washington State University Jan. 3, 2008

IR-4 FIELD DATA BOOK

2000 RUTGERS Turfgrass Proceedings

Bayer Fungicides to Control Snow Mold on Fairways in Montana and Idaho (Final Report)

2017 Cricket Frass as a Potential Nitrogen Fertility Source

Evaluation of Burn Down Herbicides Before Overseeding Fairways

Grain Millers, Inc Rosemount non- GMO Variety Research

2005 Turfgrass Research Report. In Cooperation With The

Control of Ragweed with Pre-Emergent Herbicides Christy Hoepting and Darcy Telenko

Triticale and Rye. Tifton, Georgia: Triticale and Rye Grain Performance, Average 2 Average 2 Weight Height Lodging Date

Introduction: Methods:

1987 TURFGRASS SOIL RESEARCH REPORT. P. E. Rieke, M. T. McElroy and Douglas Lee Crop and Soil Sciences Department, M.S.U.

Proline Fungicide on Corn Silage to Reduce Mycotoxins 2014

Objective: Experimental Procedures:

2012 Turfgrass Pathology Field Research

Winter Cover Crop Plots Willott Farms

Objective: Experimental Procedures:

Economics of Spice Pepper Production in Oklahoma 1

P artners in. Peanut Variety Tests. rogress. C. B. Godsey and W. Vaughan Department of Plant and Soil Sciences. Variety Tests.

Turfgrass Entomology Research 2006

Amicarbazone, a Newer Herbicide for Annual Bluegrass Control In Bentgrass

What to Do about Mixed-Species (Heinz 57) Fairways on Golf Courses: Eliminating Perennial Ryegrass with Corsair & Update on Controlling Earthworms

Post-emergent Goosegrass Control in a Mixed Stand of Fairway Turf with Sulfentrazone (Dismiss) and Fenoxaprop (Acclaim Extra), 2006

Objective: Experimental Procedures:

Civitas + Harmonizer with or without Low Rates of Fungicides to Control Snow Mold on Putting Greens in Washington

Comparison of Two Yellow Sticky Traps for Capture of Western Cherry Fruit Fly (Rhagoletis indifferens) in Tart Cherry in Northern Utah 2015

Arkansas Corn and Grain Sorghum Performance Tests

Rate Charts: Gandy Spreaders 24, 36 & 42-inch Models

Final Report. Herbicide screening trial. Les Mitchell Eurofins Agrisearch. Project Number: TU13032

Charles T. Golob and William J. Johnston Dept. Crop and Soil Sciences Washington State University June 5, 2013

(2 pts) Draw the line of best fit through the data and estimate the concentration of Fe in your sample solution.

Cereal Production ANTICS!

Auditor Name: Certifying Organization: Audit Location:

Smart Water Application Technologies (SWAT)

WARM-SEASON TURFGRASS N RATES & IRRIGATION BMP VERIFICATION DEP WM 869 COMPLETED STUDIES REPORT. Principal Investigators

Evaluation of Plant Growth Regulators and Fertilizer to Fairway Height Creeping Bentgrass J.A. Borger and M.B. Naedel 1

Insect, Weed and Overseeding Management for Wendy Gelernter Ph.D.

BINDEX BFM INSTALLATION GUIDELINES

Syngenta Soybean Insecticide Screening Study Beaumont, TX 2017

Chemical / Seed Rate Charts: Gandy Spreaders 14 Series Linear / Broadcast Applicator

WATER USE AND EFFECTIVENESS OF A LOW PRESSURE MISTER SYSTEM FOR COOLING LACTATING DAIRY COWS DURING CHRONIC HEAT STRESS

Turf Screen Solar protectant tests on creeping bentgrass Agrostis stolonifera L. plant quality under stress conditions.

2018 Corn Grain Field Crop Trials Results

Daba S. Gedafa, Ph.D., P.E. UND Civil Engineering

Performance of New Bermudagrass Varieties in the Southeast. Kyley

Rainfall and dry Spell analysis for Mahabubnagar district

2017 NCWSS weed contest Time:

Valves. Controllers. Valves Two Types

@farmtested. Research and Evaluation Results

NATURAL RESOURCES, UNIVERSITY

AMVAC - Snow Mold Control with Various Fungicide Combinations with AMV4820-G or Turfcide 400 on Fairways in Washington and Montana

Chester Golf Club Water Study 2017 APPENDIX

Determination of Contribution to Off-field Deposition from Multiple Swaths

ENERGY BILL ORGANIZATION

2017/18 Corn Outlook

Small Grains Variety Evaluation at Arizona City, Maricopa and Yuma, 2013

Turfgrass and Environmental Research Online

2011 Turfgrass Pathology Field Research

MANAGEMENT PRACTICES AFFECTING PUTTING GREEN SPEED. The management practices identified in the survey of golf courses

HRI s Mission: Copyright, All Rights Reserved

52 nd Annual. Sweetpotato Meeting. UCCE Classroom, Merced CA February 7, 2017

Snow Mold Recovery Observations. Introduction

Syngenta/Bayer Fungicide Trial: Reduced Rates of Fungicides to Control Snow Mold on Fairways in Idaho and Washington

M E A S U R E M E N T U N I T S

Prionus Mating Disruption and Trap Capture in Sweet Cherry 2011

Turfgrass and Environmental Research Online

Design Criteria Data

Design Criteria Data

WIND DATA REPORT. Mt. Tom

Design Criteria Data

Beef Outlook. Regional Dealer Event. February 9, Dr. Scott Brown Agricultural Markets and Policy Division of Applied Social Sciences

Navel orangeworm biology, monitoring, and management

Bayer Fungicides to Control Snow Mold on Putting Greens in Montana, Idaho, and Washington (Final Report)

Suburb Flyover Report

Measuring Relative Achievements: Percentile rank and Percentile point

Weed control in ornamental bulbs ( ). Tim Miller and Carl Libbey, WSU Mount Vernon. Materials and Methods.

Civitas Plus Harmonizer Tank Mixed with Reduced Rates of Fungicides to Control Snow Mold on Putting Greens in Idaho and Washington

Transcription:

General Trial Information LSU genter Northeast Research Station ZIDU VS. WRRNT POST-DIRETED IN LL/RR OTTON Investigator:Donnie Miller Trial Location ity:st. JOSEPH State/Prov.:Louisiana Postal ode:71366 Title:Weed Scientist ountry: US United States rop Description rop 1:GOSHI Gossypium hirsutum merican upland cotton Variety:ST5289GLT Planting Date:May-6-2014 Site and Design Harvested Width, Unit:6.67 FT Harvested Length, Unit:25 FT Treated Plot Width:6.67 FT Treated Plot Length:25 FT Treated Plot rea:166.75 FT2 Treatments:9 Replications:4 Study Design:FTOR Factorial Soil Description Description Name:DEFOL UT % Sand:50 % OM:0.5 Texture:SIL silt loam % Silt:28 ph:6.8 % lay:22 E:12.8 pplication Description pplication Date: Jun-11-2014 Jun-27-2014 Jul-14-2014 ppl. Start Time: 9:30 M ppl. Stop Time: 3:15 PM 5:55 PM 9:50 M pplication Method: SPRY SPRY SPRY pplication Timing: MIPOR LPOR LYY pplication Placement: RODIR RODIR RODIR ir Temperature, Unit: 85 F 77 F 83 F % Relative Humidity: 45 90 79 Wind Velocity, Unit: 7.2 MPH 4.5 MPH 4.3 MPH Dew Presence (Y/N): N no N no N no Soil Temperature, Unit: 80 79 F 84 F Soil Moisture: STURTED GOOD % loud over: 20 30 rop Stage t Each pplication rop 1 ode, H Scale: GOSHI OT GOSHI OT GOSHI OT Stage Scale Used: 5-6 LF PINHED 1ST FLOWE pplication Equipment ppl. Equipment: KPK KPK KPK Operation Pressure, Unit: 19 PSI 19 PSI 19 PSI Nozzle Type: TK2 TK2 TK2 Nozzle Spacing, Unit: 40 " 40 " 40 " Nozzles/Row: 1 1 1 Ground Speed, Unit: 3.2 MPH 3.2 MPH 3.2 MPH arrier: WTER WTER WTER Spray Volume, Unit: 15 gal/ac 20 gal/ac 15 gal/ac

Trt Treatment Form Form Rate ppl mt Product Rep No. Name onc Type Rate Unit ode to Measure 1 2 3 4 1 ZIDU 85WG 1.5oz/a 2.126 g/mx 101 209 307 405 2 ZIDU 85WG 1.5oz/a 2.126 g/mx 102 201 303 406 FIRST PINHED SQURE 3 ZIDU 85WG 1.5oz/a 2.126 g/mx 103 208 304 404 4 ZIDU 85WG 3oz/a 4.252 g/mx 104 203 301 402 5 ZIDU 85WG 3oz/a 4.252 g/mx 105 202 305 403 FIRST PINHED SQURE 6 ZIDU 85WG 3oz/a 4.252 g/mx 106 205 309 401 7 WRRNT 3S 1.25qt/a 59.15 ml/mx 107 207 302 409 8 WRRNT 3S 1.25qt/a 59.15 ml/mx 108 204 306 408 FIRST PINHED SQURE 9 WRRNT 3 S 1.25 qt/a 59.15 ml/mx 109 206 308 407 rop ode GOSHI GOSHI GOSHI GOSHI GOSHI GOSHI GOSHI H Scale OT OT OT OT OT OT OT rop Scientific Name Gossypium hirs> Gossypium hirs> Gossypium hirs> Gossypium hirs> Gossypium hirs> Gossypium hirs> Gossypium hirs> rop Name merican uplan> merican uplan> merican uplan> merican uplan> merican uplan> merican uplan> merican uplan> Rating Date Jun-18-2014 Jun-24-2014 Jul-4-2014 Jul-9-2014 Jul-21-2014 Jul-28-2014 ug-22-2014 Rating Type INJURY INJURY INJURY INJURY INJURY INJURY INJURY Rating Unit % % % % % % % Number of Subsamples 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Rating Timing 1 W 2 W 1 W 4W 4 W 2 W Days fter First/Last pplic. 7 7 13 13 23 7 28 12 40 7 47 14 72 39 Trt-Eval Interval 2 W 1 W Plant-Eval Interval 43 DP-1 49 DP-1 59 DP-1 64 DP-1 76 DP-1 83 DP-1 108 DP-1 RM ction odes Number of Decimals Trt Treatment Rate ppl No. Name Rate Unit ode 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 TLE OF R MENS Replicate 1 4.3 1.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Replicate 2 5.0 2.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Replicate 3 4.3 2.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Replicate 4 4.5 2.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 TLE OF (HERIIDES) MENS 1 ZIDU 1.5 oz/a 2.5 b 2.5 a 0.0 a 0.0 a 0.0 a 0.0 a 0.0 a 2 ZIDU 3 oz/a 8.9 a 3.8 a 0.0 a 0.0 a 0.0 a 0.0 a 0.0 a 3 WRRNT 1.25 qt/a 0.0 b 0.0 a 0.0 a 0.0 a 0.0 a 0.0 a 0.0 a TLE OF (GROWTH STGE) MENS 1 5.6 a 2.9 a. a 0.0 a 0.0 a 0.0 a 0.0 a 0.0 b. c 0.0 a 0.0 a 0.0 a 0.0 a 0.0 a 7.5 a 0.0 b. a. a 0.0 a 0.0 a 0.0 a TLE OF (HERIIDES) (GROWTH STGE) MENS 1 ZIDU 1.5 oz/a 5.0 b 5.0 a. a 0.0 a 0.0 a 0.0 a 0.0 a 1 2 ZIDU 3 oz/a 11.7 a 3.8 a. a 0.0 a 0.0 a 0.0 a 0.0 a 1 3 WRRNT 1.25 qt/a 0.0 b 0.0 a. a 0.0 a 0.0 a 0.0 a 0.0 a 1 1 ZIDU 1.5 oz/a. c. a 0.0 a 0.0 a 0.0 a 0.0 a 0.0 a 2 ZIDU 3 oz/a 0.0 b. a 0.0 a 0.0 a 0.0 a 0.0 a 0.0 a 3 WRRNT 1.25 qt/a 0.0 b. a 0.0 a 0.0 a 0.0 a 0.0 a 0.0 a 1 ZIDU 1.5 oz/a 0.0 b 0.0 a. a. a 0.0 a 0.0 a 0.0 a 2 ZIDU 3 oz/a 15.0 a. a. a. a 0.0 a 0.0 a 0.0 a 3 WRRNT 1.25 qt/a. c. a. a. a 0.0 a 0.0 a 0.0 a

rop ode GOSHI GOSHI H Scale OT OT rop Scientific Name Gossypium hirs> Gossypium hirs> rop Name merican uplan> merican uplan> Rating Date Oct-16-2014 Oct-16-2014 Rating Type YIELD YIELD Rating Unit L L/ Number of Subsamples 1 1 Rating Timing Days fter First/Last pplic. 127 94 127 94 Trt-Eval Interval Plant-Eval Interval 163 DP-1 163 DP-1 RM ction odes TY1 Number of Decimals 1 Trt Treatment Rate ppl No. Name Rate Unit ode 8 9 TLE OF R MENS Replicate 1 14.098 3682.8 Replicate 2 14.320 3740.8 Replicate 3 14.538 3797.7 Replicate 4 14.033 3665.9 TLE OF (HERIIDES) MENS 1ZIDU 1.5oz/a 14.468a 3779.6 a 2ZIDU 3oz/a 13.950a 3644.2 a 3WRRNT 1.25qt/a 14.323a 3741.7 a TLE OF (GROWTH STGE) MENS 1 14.913a 3895.8 a 2FIRST PINHED SQURE 14.058a 3672.5 a 3 13.770a 3597.1 a TLE OF (HERIIDES) (GROWTH STGE) MENS 1ZIDU 1.5oz/a 14.965a 3909.3 a 1 2ZIDU 3oz/a 15.145a 3956.3 a 1 3WRRNT 1.25qt/a 14.630a 3821.8 a 1 1ZIDU 1.5 oz/a 14.070 a 3675.5 a 2 ZIDU 3 oz/a 13.180 a 3443.0 a 3 WRRNT 1.25 qt/a 14.925 a 3898.8 a 1 ZIDU 1.5 oz/a 14.370 a 3753.9 a 2 ZIDU 3 oz/a 13.525 a 3533.1 a 3 WRRNT 1.25 qt/a 13.415 a 3504.4 a OMPLETE FTORIL OV For GOSHI OT Gossypium hirsutum merican upland cotton Jun-18-2014 INJURY % 1 1 W 7 7 43 DP-1 (Data olumn 1) Total 35 1465.432099 R 3 1.851852 0.617284 0.031 0.9924 4.6 2 535.802469 267.901235 13.354 0.0062 4.5 R 6 120.370370 20.061728 1.000 0.4682 8.0 2 224.691358 112.345679 182.000 0.0001 0.8 R 6 3.703704 0.617284 0.031 0.9998 8.0 4 338.271605 84.567901 4.215 0.0233 6.9 R 12 240.740741 20.061728 FTORIL/POOLED ERROR OV For GOSHI OT Gossypium hirsutum merican upland cotton Jun-18-2014 INJURY % 1 1 W 7 7 43 DP-1 (Data olumn 1) Total 35 1465.432099 R 3 1.851852 0.617284 0.041 0.9888 3.8 2 535.802469 267.901235 17.624 0.0001 3.3 2 224.691358 112.345679 7.391 0.0032 3.3 4 338.271605 84.567901 5.563 0.0026 5.7 ERROR 24 364.814815 15.200617 OMPLETE FTORIL OV For GOSHI OT Gossypium hirsutum merican upland cotton Jun-24-2014 INJURY % 1 2 W 13 13 49 DP-1 (Data olumn 2) Total 35 290.972222 R 3 2.083333 0.694444 0.077 0.9713 3.1 2 18.055556 9.027778 1.000 0.4219 3.0 R 6 54.166667 9.027778 1.000 0.4682 5.3 2 68.055556 34.027778 49.000 0.0002 0.8 R 6 4.166667 0.694444 0.077 0.9975 5.3 4 36.111111 9.027778 1.000 0.4449 4.6 R 12 108.333333 9.027778 FTORIL/POOLED ERROR OV For GOSHI OT Gossypium hirsutum merican upland cotton Jun-24-2014 INJURY % 1 2 W 13 13 49 DP-1 (Data olumn 2) Total 35 290.972222 R 3 2.083333 0.694444 0.100 0.9592 2.6 2 18.055556 9.027778 1.300 0.2910 2.2 2 68.055556 34.027778 4.900 0.0164 2.2 4 36.111111 9.027778 1.300 0.2982 3.8 ERROR 24 166.666667 6.944444 OMPLETE FTORIL OV For GOSHI OT Gossypium hirsutum merican upland cotton Jul-4-2014 INJURY % 1 1 W 23 7 59 DP-1 (Data olumn 3)

R 6 0.000000 0.000000 0.000 0.0000 0.0 R 12 0.000000 0.000000 FTORIL/POOLED ERROR OV For GOSHI OT Gossypium hirsutum merican upland cotton Jul-4-2014 INJURY % 1 1 W 23 7 59 DP-1 (Data olumn 3) OMPLETE FTORIL OV For GOSHI OT Gossypium hirsutum merican upland cotton Jul-9-2014 INJURY % 1 4W 28 12 2 W 64 DP-1 (Data olumn 4) R 6 0.000000 0.000000 0.000 0.0000 0.0 R 12 0.000000 0.000000 FTORIL/POOLED ERROR OV For GOSHI OT Gossypium hirsutum merican upland cotton Jul-9-2014 INJURY % 1 4W 28 12 2 W 64 DP-1 (Data olumn 4) OMPLETE FTORIL OV For GOSHI OT Gossypium hirsutum merican upland cotton Jul-21-2014 INJURY % 1 4 W 40 7 1 W 76 DP-1 (Data olumn 5) R 6 0.000000 0.000000 0.000 0.0000 0.0 R 12 0.000000 0.000000 FTORIL/POOLED ERROR OV For GOSHI OT Gossypium hirsutum merican upland cotton Jul-21-2014 INJURY % 1 4 W 40 7 1 W 76 DP-1 (Data olumn 5)

OMPLETE FTORIL OV For GOSHI OT Gossypium hirsutum merican upland cotton Jul-28-2014 INJURY % 1 2 W 47 14 83 DP-1 (Data olumn 6) R 6 0.000000 0.000000 0.000 0.0000 0.0 R 12 0.000000 0.000000 FTORIL/POOLED ERROR OV For GOSHI OT Gossypium hirsutum merican upland cotton Jul-28-2014 INJURY % 1 2 W 47 14 83 DP-1 (Data olumn 6) OMPLETE FTORIL OV For GOSHI OT Gossypium hirsutum merican upland cotton ug-22-2014 INJURY % 1 72 39 108 DP-1 (Data olumn 7) R 6 0.000000 0.000000 0.000 0.0000 0.0 R 12 0.000000 0.000000 FTORIL/POOLED ERROR OV For GOSHI OT Gossypium hirsutum merican upland cotton ug-22-2014 INJURY % 1 72 39 108 DP-1 (Data olumn 7) OMPLETE FTORIL OV For GOSHI OT Gossypium hirsutum merican upland cotton Oct-16-2014 YIELD L 1 127 94 163 DP-1 (Data olumn 8) Total 35 66.433722 R 3 1.420211 0.473404 0.341 0.7959 1.210 2 1.716289 0.858144 0.209 0.8172 2.025 R 6 24.664156 4.110693 2.965 0.0516 2.095 2 8.485489 4.242744 3.975 0.0796 1.032 R 6 6.404556 1.067426 0.770 0.6080 2.095 4 7.105244 1.776311 1.281 0.3310 1.814 R 12 16.637778 1.386481 FTORIL/POOLED ERROR OV For GOSHI OT Gossypium hirsutum merican upland cotton Oct-16-2014 YIELD L 1 127 94 163 DP-1 (Data olumn 8) Total 35 66.433722 R 3 1.420211 0.473404 0.238 0.8689 1.372 2 1.716289 0.858144 0.432 0.6543 1.188 2 8.485489 4.242744 2.134 0.1402 1.188 4 7.105244 1.776311 0.894 0.4830 2.058 ERROR 24 47.706489 1.987770 OMPLETE FTORIL OV For GOSHI OT Gossypium hirsutum merican upland cotton Oct-16-2014 YIELD L/ 1 127 94 163 DP-1 TY1 1 (Data olumn 9) Total 35 4533490.313180 R 3 96916.341574 32305.447191 0.341 0.7959 316.0 2 117120.925821 58560.462910 0.209 0.8172 529.1 R 6 1683101.692238 280516.948706 2.965 0.0516 547.3 2 579056.545284 289528.272642 3.975 0.0796 269.6 R 6 437051.991069 72841.998511 0.770 0.6080 547.3 4 484867.560994 121216.890249 1.281 0.3310 473.9 R 12 1135375.256200 94614.604683 FTORIL/POOLED ERROR OV For GOSHI OT Gossypium hirsutum merican upland cotton Oct-16-2014 YIELD L/ 1 127 94 163 DP-1 TY1 1 (Data olumn 9) Total 35 4533490.313180 R 3 96916.341574 32305.447191 0.238 0.8689 358.4 2 117120.925821 58560.462910 0.432 0.6543 310.3 2 579056.545284 289528.272642 2.134 0.1402 310.3 4 484867.560994 121216.890249 0.894 0.4830 537.5 ERROR 24 3255528.939507 135647.039146 rop ode GOSHI, OT, Gossypium hirsutum, = US Rating Type YIELD = yield Rating Unit % = percent L = pound Plant-Eval Interval 43 DP-1 = 1 GOSHI May-6-2014 49 DP-1 = 1 GOSHI May-6-2014 59 DP-1 = 1 GOSHI May-6-2014 64 DP-1 = 1 GOSHI May-6-2014 76 DP-1 = 1 GOSHI May-6-2014 83 DP-1 = 1 GOSHI May-6-2014 108 DP-1 = 1 GOSHI May-6-2014 163 DP-1 = 1 GOSHI May-6-2014 RM ction odes TY1 = 261.2294*[8]