Graphing population size daily Review Deer: Predation or Starvation

Similar documents
The Lesson of the Kaibab

Regents Biology LAB. NATURAL CONTROLS OF POPULATIONS

Biology B / Sanderson!

Predator Prey Lab Exercise L2

Predator Prey Lab Exercise L3

NATURAL CONTROLS OF POPULATIONS: 3 CASE STUDIES

STUDENT PACKET # 6 Student Exploration: Rabbit Population by Season

Prior Knowledge: Students should have an understanding that plants and animals compete for resources such as food, space, water, air and shelter.

Science Skills Station

Lab: Predator-Prey Simulation

Ecology Part 2 ~ NJBCT ~ End of Year Populations, Biodiversity, and Conservation

SCIENCE EXTENDED LEARNING MODULES STUDENT PACKET GRADE 8 6: INTERDEPENDENCE

c. Escape from Unsuitable Conditions i. A long term escape of a period of reduced activity 1. Ex. ii. Moving to a more favorable habitat 1. Ex.

Mule and Black-tailed Deer

Deer Population Student Guide

An Alternative Explanation for Leopold s Kaibab Deer Herd Irruption of the 1920 s

"Oh! Deer! & Limiting Factors" adapted from Project Wild Mr. Mark Musselman Audubon at the Francis Beidler Forest

2015 Deer Population Goal Setting

Ecological Pyramids Adapted from The Nevada Outdoor School, The Playa Ecological Pyramids Lesson Plan

Wolves in Yellowstone Park. A Story about Ecosystem Balance

Ecology Quiz Which example shows a relationship between a living thing and a nonliving thing?

Stakeholder Activity

Carrying Capacity Activity. 5 th Grade PSI. Teacher s Notes Procedure: Simulation 1 Regular herds

Background Summary Kaibab Plateau: Source: Kormondy, E. J. (1996). Concepts of Ecology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. p.96.

Competition. Competition. Competition. Competition. Competition. Competition. Competition. Long history in ecology

Early History, Prehistory

Jeffrey Cole, Wildlife Manager Fish and Wildlife Dispatch

Native Species Restoration and its Impact on Local Populations

Living World Review #2

Veronica Yovovich, Ph.D. Wildlife Conflict Specialist and Science Program Director Mountain Lion Foundation

Invasive Versus Endemic Species

Comment Letter 1 for Item 5

Chapter 20: Page 250

The Ups and Downs of Populations Based on Oh Deer by Project WILD By Heather Miller

ALTERNATIVE DEER MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR GAME MANAGEMENT UNITS. 12A, 12B, 13A, 13B, 16A, 45A, 45B, 45C, and White-tailed Deer Units

Invasive Species. Grade Levels. Introduction. This activity is intended for grades 9 12.

Invasive Versus Endemic Species

Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations

Chapter 20. Case #7 (Review Copy) Cycles in Predator and Prey Populations

The New Coyote and Deer Predation

Controlled Take (Special Status Game Mammal Chapter)

The history of the bison: A symbol of the American story

Wildlife Management. Wildlife Management. Geography 657

Population Ecology Yellowstone Elk by C. John Graves

THE WOLF WATCHERS. Endangered gray wolves return to the American West

Street Edmonton, AB T6K 1T8. Alberta Fish and Game Association (AFGA) Position On Game Farming In Alberta February 2004

Livestock Losses. From Department of Agriculture report 2010 (report also available on this website)

Job Title: Game Management, Subsection B Game Management Mountain Lion. SPECIES: Mountain Lion

Search for the missing sea otters

Governor Bill Richardson Orders Temporary Trapping Ban to Protect the Mexican Gray Wolf

project 1 [ti] Name Address Club .'_ D.St.SS" A?G.I R.3? '!UJ.SS at: B 1MILDLIFE

Ecological Carrying Capacity

Mule Deer. Dennis D. Austin. Published by Utah State University Press. For additional information about this book

H U M a N I M A L I A 6:2. Reviews

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Feasibility Study on the Reintroduction of Gray Wolves to the Olympic Peninsula

QUAIL CSI USING A SCENT STATION

Humans are 'unique super-predator'

Job Title: Game Management, Subsection B Game Management Mountain Lion. SPECIES: Mountain Lion

Oh Deer! Objectives. Background. Method. Materials

Jeffrey M. Ver Steeg Colorado Parks and Wildlife. December 14, 2016

Copyright 2018 by Jamie L. Sandberg

Saiga: Spirit of the Steppe. You can do things every day to be a hero for saiga! by San Diego Zoo Global. Created for the Saiga Conservation Alliance

P.O. Box 24 Joshua Tree, California July 16, 2015

LEAPS BOUNDS. Growing up hunting as a kid in New Hampshire, I didn t. by Dan Bergeron

Managing Wildlife Populations

This project is about reintroducing animals that became extinct in Britain many years ago. I will be looking at the pros and the cons of the

Paul Schullery. for beetles, flies, and many other small animals, the elk is a village waiting to happen.

ACTIVITY FIVE SPECIES AT RISK LEARNING OBJECTIVES: MATERIALS: Subjects: Science, math, art, history

STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS. Court File No. A Petitioners, Respondents.

Modeling Population Decline

Recommendations for Pennsylvania's Deer Management Program and The 2010 Deer Hunting Season

Matching respondents over time and assessing non-response bias. Respondents sometimes left age or sex blank (n=52 from 2001 or 2004 and n=39 from

Job Title: Game Management, Subsection B Game Management Mountain Lion

Wildlife CSI - Panhandle elk mortality study

OREGON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE FIELD STAFF RESPONSE FOR COUGAR INFORMATION AND CONFLICT SITUATIONS

A Review of Mule and Black-tailed Deer Population Dynamics

Wild Wapiti Wild Wapiti activities are directly tied to the third spread - pages 5 and 6 of Our Wetland Project.

Population Fluctuations in an Ecosystem Grade 6

Sharks: We re not just talking great whites. There are around 500 known species of shark. Dive for Sharks

NEWS RELEASE. Harvest allocation ensures certainty for hunting sector

CHEETAH PROJECT Cheetah Conservation Fund. Interviewers name Date

Job Title: Game Management, Subsection B Game Management Mountain Lion. SPECIES: Mountain Lion

Diversity of Life Field Trip Guide Student

Predation: Lies, Myths, and Scientific Fraud

DESCRIBE THE HABITAT REQUIREMENTS AND OTHER FACTORS THAT AFFECT WILDLIFE SPECIES NATURAL RESOURCE I FISHERY AND WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVE 5.

Findings of the Alaska Board of Game BOG

Deer Management Unit 127

Hunting at The Trustees. The Trustees of Reservations Policy on Hunting

Introduction to Pennsylvania s Deer Management Program. Christopher S. Rosenberry Deer and Elk Section Bureau of Wildlife Management

Mountain Caribou Recovery Implementation Plan. Predator/Prey Component. Terms of Reference

Building System Dynamics Models

Classroom Activity: Population Study Game (Oh, Deer!)

Name Black Rhinoceros Genetics Class:

make people aware of the department s actions for improving the deer population monitoring system,

Attorneys for Plaintiffs Hells Canyon Preservation Council and The Wilderness Society UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO

The wolf hunt is on in Wyoming after endangered protections are lifted

Beaver Fever. Adapted From: Oh Deer, Project Wild K-12 Activity Guide, Project WILD, p

Interactions and Ecosystems Practice Quiz Topic 2 - Human Impacts on Ecosystems

BIGHORN SHEEP IN IDAHO

April Nisga a Fisheries & Wildlife Department

Transcription:

: Predation or Starvation Introduction: In 1970 the deer population of an island forest reserve about 518 square kilometers in size was about 2000 animals. Although the island had excellent vegetation for feeding, the food supply obviously had limits. Thus the forest management personnel feared that overgrazing might lead to mass starvation. Since the area was too remote for hunters, the wildlife service decided to bring in natural predators to control the deer population. It was hoped that natural predation would keep the deer population from becoming too large and also increase the deer quality (or health), as predators often eliminate the weaker members of the herd. In 1971, ten wolves were flown into the island. The results of this program are shown in the following table. The Change is the number of deer born minus the number of deer that died during that year. Fill out the last column for each year (the first has been calculated for you). Year Wolf Offspring Predation Starvation 1971 10 2,000 800 400 100 +300 1972 12 2,300 920 480 240 1973 16 2,500 1,000 640 500 1974 22 2,360 944 880 180 1975 28 2,224 996 1,120 26 1976 24 2,094 836 960 2 1977 21 1,968 788 840 0 1978 18 1,916 766 720 0 1979 19 1,952 780 760 0 1980 19 1,972 790 760 0 Change 1. Graph the deer and wolf populations on the graph below. Use one color to show deer populations and another color to show wolf populations.

Analysis 1. Describe what happened to the deer and wolf populations between 1971 and 1980. 2. What do you think would have happened to the deer on the island had wolves NOT been introduced? 3. Most biology textbooks describe that predators and prey exist in a balance. This "balance of nature" hypothesis has been criticized by some scientists because it suggests a relationship between predators and prey that is good and necessary. Opponents of this hypothesis propose the following questions: Why is death by predators more natural or "right" then death by starvation? How does one determine when an ecosystem is in "balance"? Do predators really kill only the old and sick prey? What evidence is there for this statement? What is your opinion of the balance of nature hypothesis? Would the deer on the island be better off, worse off, or about the same without the wolves? Defend your position.

The Lesson of the Kaibab Objectives: Introduction: The environment may be altered by forces within the biotic community, as well as by relationships between organisms and the physical environment. The carrying capacity of an ecosystem is the maximum number of organisms that an area can support on a sustained basis. The density of a population may produce such profound changes in the environment that the environment becomes unsuitable for the survival of that species. For instance, overgrazing of land may make the land unable to support the grazing of animals that lived there. Graph data on the Kaibab deer population of Arizona from 1905 to 1939 Determine factors responsible for the changing populations Determine the carrying capacity of the Kaibab Plateau Background Before 1905, the deer on the Kaibab Plateau were estimated to number about 4000. The average carrying capacity of the range was then estimated to be about 30,000 deer. On November 28th, 1906, President Theodore Roosevelt created the Grand Canyon National Game Preserve to protect the "finest deer herd in America." Unfortunately, by this time the Kaibab forest area had already been overgrazed by sheep, cattle, and horses. Most of the tall grasses had been eliminated. The first step to protect the deer was to ban all hunting. In addition, in 1907, The Forest Service tried to exterminate the predators of the deer. Between 1907 and 1939, 816 mountain lions, 20 wolves, 7388 coyotes and more than 500 bobcats were killed. Signs that the deer population was out of control began to appear as early as 1920 - the range was beginning to deteriorate rapidly. The Forest Service reduced the number of livestock grazing permits. By 1923, the deer were reported to be on the verge of starvation and the range conditions were described as "deplorable." The Kaibab Investigating Committee recommended that all livestock not owned by local residents be removed immediately from the range and that the number of deer be cut in half as quickly as possible. Hunting was reopened, and during the fall of 1924, 675 deer were killed by hunters. However, these deer represented only one-tenth the number of deer that had been born that spring. Over the next two winters, it is estimated that 60,000 deer starved to death. Today, the Arizona Game Commission carefully manages the Kaibab area with regulations geared to specific local needs. Hunting permits are issued to keep the deer in balance with their range. Predators are protected to help keep herds in balance with food supplies. Tragic winter losses can be checked by keeping the number of deer near the carrying capacity of the range.

DATA1. Graph the deer population data. Place time on the X axis and "number of deer" on the Y axis DATA TABLE Year 1905 4,000 1910 9,000 1915 25,000 1920 65,000 1924 100,000 1925 60,000 1926 40,000 1927 37,000 1928 35,000 1929 30,000 1930 25,000 1931 20,000 1935 18,000 1939 10,000

Analysis 1. During 1906 and 1907, what two methods did the Forest Service use to protect the Kaibab deer? 2. Were these methods successful? Use the data from your graph to support your answer. 3. Why do you suppose the population of deer declined in 1925, although the eliminationof predators occurred? 4. Why do you think the deer population size in 1900 was 4,000 when it is estimated that the plateau has a carrying capacity of 30,000? 5. Based on these lessons, suggest what YOU would have done in the following years to manage deer herds. 1915: 1926: 6. It is a criticism of many population ecologists that the pattern of population increase and subsequent crash of the deer population would have occurred even if the bounty had not been placed on the predators. Do you agree or disagree with this statement. Explain your reasoning. 7. What future management plans would you suggest for the Kaibab deer herd?