ADCP data ranges from Oceanus and Wecoma Jules Hummon July 9, 2013 DRAFT

Similar documents
Columbia River Plume 2006 OSU Ocean Mixing Nash, Kilcher, Moum et al. CR05 Cruise Report (RISE Pt. Sur, May )

WHOTS Mooring Subsurface Instrumentation

14/10/2013' Bathymetric Survey. egm502 seafloor mapping

High Ping Rate Profile Water Mode 12

, Rev (C) (ARRV)

PRELIMINARY CRUISE REPORT, W9909C R/V WECOMA, September 1999 GLOBEC/ENSO Long-Term Observations off Oregon

Draft of OKMC Cruise Plan (R/V Revelle June 1-14, 2012 RR1205)

Measuring Discharge in Shallower Rivers: ADCPs go from Rio to Pro

Sontek RiverSurveyor Test Plan Prepared by David S. Mueller, OSW February 20, 2004

R/V Kilo Moana EM122 Multibeam Echosounder Review KM August 9-13, 2015

Hydroacoustic surveys of Otsego Lake s pelagic fish community,

Water circulation in Dabob Bay, Washington: Focus on the exchange flows during the diurnal tide transitions

USCGC HEALY WAGB-20 Final Report RD Instruments Inc. Ocean Surveyor 75 khz Prepared by: Ron Hippe Commissioning Dates: 3/27/2002-3/30/2002

BOTTOM MAPPING WITH EM1002 /EM300 /TOPAS Calibration of the Simrad EM300 and EM1002 Multibeam Echo Sounders in the Langryggene calibration area.

Oceanographic Research With The LiquID Station

Island-trapped waves, internal waves, and island circulation

Geostrophic and Tidal Currents in the South China Sea, Area III: West Philippines

High Frequency Acoustical Propagation and Scattering in Coastal Waters

Background material and considerations of sea-state limitations for helicopter landing and take-off on passenger ships and ferries are undertaken.

Echo Sounder Evaluation of XBT Drop Rate off the coast of Florida

APPENDIX 3E HYDROACOUSTIC ANALYSIS OF FISH POPULATIONS IN COPCO AND IRON GATE RESERVOIRS, CALIFORNIA NOVEMBER

TRIAXYS Acoustic Doppler Current Profiler Comparison Study

4-3 Rate of Change and Slope. Warm Up. 1. Find the x- and y-intercepts of 2x 5y = 20. Describe the correlation shown by the scatter plot. 2.

SIO 210 MIDTERM, 26 October 2009.

Landmark for the spawning of Japanese eel

R/V Sikuliaq EM302 & EM710 Multibeam Echosounder System Shipboard Acceptance Tests - SKQ201400L3 August 9 18, 2014

Surface Tracking Feature

Overview. 2 Module 13: Advanced Data Processing

AAIW05: ADCP/LADCP Cruise Report Antarctic Intermediate Water Formation in the Southeast Pacific 21 August to 6 October 2005 Teresa K.

Full scale VIV response measurements of a drill pipe in Gulf of Mexico loop currents (OMAE )

Currents measurements in the coast of Montevideo, Uruguay

Motion Graphing Packet

R/V Bat Galim EM302 & EM2040 Multibeam Echosounder System Review January 31 February 4, 2016

The Wave Glider: A Mobile Buoy Concept for Ocean Science. 009 Liquid Robotics Inc.

Observations of noise generated by nonlinear internal waves on the continental shelf during the SW06 experiment

Characterizing The Surf Zone With Ambient Noise Measurements

7 YEARS METEOMAST AMRUMBANK WEST

RSKtools for Matlab processing RBR data

Lucid System In-Service Training

Increased streamer depth for dual-sensor acquisition Challenges and solutions Marina Lesnes*, Anthony Day, Martin Widmaier, PGS

Lat. & Long. Review. Angular distance N or S of equator Equator = 0º Must indicate N or S North pole = 90º N

COASTAL OCEANOGRAPHIC FIELD EQUIPMENT AND SUGGESTED TOPICS

Completion of Hydrometric Survey Notes (HSN)

page - Laboratory Exercise #5 Shoreline Processes

Minimal influence of wind and tidal height on underwater noise in Haro Strait

Internal Waves and Mixing in the Aegean Sea

Using Acoustic Windows

Appendix 5: Currents in Minas Basin. (Oceans Ltd. 2009)

Waves, Bubbles, Noise, and Underwater Communications

Fault Diagnosis based on Particle Filter - with applications to marine crafts

Examples of Carter Corrected DBDB-V Applied to Acoustic Propagation Modeling

Cruise Report Towed ADCP Bay of Biscay R/V Pelagia cruise 64PE April 2005 Texel - Vigo

Takeoff Performance. A 1 C change in temperature from ISA will increase or decrease the takeoff ground roll by 10%.

ACOUSTIC VELOCITY FOR NATURAL GAS

Deep water plume models - What s special about deep water

Application for Consent to Conduct Marine Scientific Research. F Internal Waves in Straits (IWISE) Institution Contact Information Director

Nortek Technical Note No.: TN-021. Chesapeake Bay AWAC Evaluation

Understanding of Meteorology. for. Handling LNG at Ports

: Hydrodynamic input for 2D Vessel Simulations (HY- 0027)

Energy Transfer to Upper Trophic Levels on a Small Offshore Bank

Conventional Ship Testing

Wave Glider: Liege Colloquium. Colloquium April 27

Cruise Report. Field Oceanography. Team 5, Leg 3

Historical Analysis of Montañita, Ecuador for April 6-14 and March 16-24

Engineering Surveying - II CE313. Hydrographic Survey Lecture 06 Muhammad Noman

The Evolution of Vertical Spatial Coherence with Range from Source

High-Frequency Scattering from the Sea Surface and Multiple Scattering from Bubbles

4-3 Rate of Change and Slope. Warm Up Lesson Presentation. Lesson Quiz

Applications of Collected Data from Argos Drifter, NOAA Satellite Tracked Buoy in the East Sea

Team Coordination Training 2009 Refresher Participant Reference. Learning Objectives. United States Coast Guard Auxiliary

Basic Chartwork. Necessary Tools. Navigation is the one science in which no margin whatever is left for the faker. - Felix Riesenberg

The Continuing Evolution of the New Inlet

Virtual Marine Laboratory

AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF

NOTES AND CORRESPONDENCE. Dissipative Losses in Nonlinear Internal Waves Propagating across the Continental Shelf

Observations of Velocity Fields Under Moderately Forced Wind Waves

Observations of Near-Bottom Currents with Low-Cost SeaHorse Tilt Current Meters

1999 On-Board Sacramento Regional Transit District Survey

Preliminary Design Presentation

Cascadia Initiative. Cruise OC1208B R/V Oceanus (Cascadia 2012 Leg 5) August 31, 2012 September 6, 2012 Newport, Oregon to Newport, Oregon

Chapter 10 Lecture Outline. The Restless Oceans

South Bay Coastal Ocean Observing System California Clean Beaches Initiative

October 09, Ch04 2Dmotion.notebook. Honors Physics Chapter 4. Scalar Vector Resultant. Components

Interim Operating Procedures for SonTek RiverSurveyor M9/S5

New Pacific Bigeye Tuna Projects. Oceanography s Role in Bigeye Tuna Aggregation and Vulnerability. Volume 4, Number 3 July September 1999

The Great Coastal Gale of 2007 from Coastal Storms Program Buoy 46089

N. Robinson and A. Pyne

Transmission loss (TL) can be predicted, to a very rough degree, solely on the basis of a few factors. These factors are range, and frequency.

3rd Eurocontrol CDO Workshop

Atmosphere, Ocean and Climate Dynamics Fall 2008

Stadium Project - DP-70 Atlanta, GA, 9/30/2014

What is a wave? Even here the wave more or less keeps it s shape and travelled at a constant speed. YouTube. mexicanwave.mov

FIG: 27.1 Tool String

DESIGNED AND MANUFACTURED IN ENGLAND CLIPPER DEPTH DEPTH METRES ECHO SOUNDER.

Hydrodynamic Analysis of a Heavy Lift Vessel during Offshore Installation Operations

Cruise Report Cruise no. 06NG-06TG. Exploratory investigations on Norwegian spring-spawning herring in the Norwegian Sea November 2006

Waves, Bubbles, Noise, and Underwater Communications

Planning of Drilling Operations in Extreme Ocean Currents

I. Ostrovskyet al., 2008

A Wind Profiling Platform for Offshore Wind Measurements and Assessment. Presenter: Mark Blaseckie AXYS Technologies Inc.

Transcription:

ADCP data ranges from Oceanus and Wecoma Jules Hummon July 9, 2013 DRAFT ADCP and Wind data from two UNOLS Intermediate Class vessels were examined to try to get some idea of typical ADCP range on these ships, and how the range changes with sea state and ship speed. Data presented are from the Ocean Surveyor 75kHz in narrowband mode with 16m bins. This is the typical setting for best range. The datasets included both the UHDAS ADCP complement and the shipboard data acquisition system measurements of relative wind speed and direction (including an estimate of true wind speed and direction.) Wind speed and direction are used as a proxy for sea state and swell direction. 1. Wecoma: w1111b a segment while they zigzaged northward up the coast into a wind from the north, stopping on station at each zig (or zag). The wind was from the north, i.e. a headwind. 1. As the wind speed decreased, the ADCP data range increased from 650m-700m (20kt winds) to over 750m (5kt winds). 2. When the wind was highest (20kts), the range was about 100m less when steaming than when on station. Oceanus: oc1303xb transit from Alaska to Oregon, constant heading and speed, but the wind spun through the compass headings during the cruise, generally decreasing (but with a bump for one day) 1. Higher wind speed decreases ADCP range. 2. Headwinds reduce range more than tailwinds (following seas) 3. Heavy weather decreased range form 750m (typical optimal) to 450m The summary is what one might expect: higher windspeed decreases range if winds are sufficient to decrease range, range is additionally damaged as ship speed increases as the ship maneuvers (sloshing and heaving, entraining bubbles) with headwinds more than tailwind (following seas) Other notes: Scattering levels affect range. Depending on the size, distribution and behavior of the relevant scatterers, diurnal migration can cause a change in ADCP range of 50-150m, and range varies with latitude (location) depending on the populations of relevant scatterers. Bad weather reduces the range of profiles to varying extents, sometimes enough to render the entire profile bad. It can also introduce biases into some of those profiles that do have vertical extent. The result can be complete data loss due to lack of good profiles. Acoustic noise (eg. propellor cavitation) and bubbles reduce range. A continuing source of frustration is electrical noise, which reduces range and can bias the data. It is not clear whether the on-station/underway range difference is due to acoustic or electrical noise, but it is a problem.

Wecoma: Zigzag into a headwind The top two panels are ocean velocity (east and north), the third panel is "Percent Good" and represents the amount of data going into the velocity averages. As pings are lost (due to bubbles, eg. underway in higher sea states) the range of each ADCP profile decreases by varying amounts, so the percentage of pings that are good at a given depth also decreases. A typical cutoff for acceptable data is 50 Percent Good. The fourth panel shows true wind speed (in red) and ship speed (in green). A cruise track over topography shows the location of the ship track and a cartoon indicating wind direction.

Wecoma, again This plot shows windspeed (top panel) and ADCP range (bottom panel), with color-coded on station and underway periods. When the wind is high (at the beginning) the range decreases by 100m when the ship gets underway (green) compared to being on station (red). As the winds decrease, range increases to about 750m, regardless of whether the ship is on station or steaming.

Oceanus Transit Panels in this plot are the same as the first Wecoma plot: ocean velocity (east and north) in the first two panels; Percent Good in the third panel; windspeed and ship speed in the fourth panel. A cruise track is shown at the bottom. All we can see in this plot is that range is reduced when wind speed is higher. The next plot includes wind direction. The first 1.5 days (when the wind was 20kts) must have been a rough ride for the passengers as well as the ADCP. Range is reduced, but measurements of wind speed and ship speed are noisy, suggesting a lot of ship motion and a heavy sea state.

Oceanus Transit with Wind Direction Range is decreased by the headwind more than the tailwind, but even with a tailwind, a pulse of wind at 84.5 is accompanied by a loss of range (150m-200m). This wind is shifty and may not accurately indicate the direction of the seas, but it is still clear: better data in low winds (750m range).