New tools for making better transportation system decisions Eric Sundquist Managing Director State Smart Transportation Initiative (SSTI) Urban Sustainability Accelerator
Accessibility and trip-making Accessibility = Ease of reaching destinations Trip-making = Actual use of the system to reach destinations 9/21/16 Accessibility and Trip-making 1
Accessibility and trip-making Accessibility = Ease of reaching destinations Trip-making = Actual use of the system to reach destinations Both measures are empirical, multimodal and scalable 9/21/16 Accessibility and Trip-making 2
Motivation Scan Assess performance Diagnose Assess solutions Communicate 9/21/16 Accessibility and Trip-making 3
Problems with conventional approach T4America 9/21/16 Accessibility and Trip-making 4
Problems with conventional approach HB 599 (Virginia) 9/21/16 Accessibility and Trip-making 5
Problems with conventional approach Bias toward big Bias toward moving vehicles Modeled travel misses idiosyncrasies Design elements not considered Modally siloed Land use an input Unverified black box Some exceptions, e.g. DelDOT s LUTSAM. 9/21/16 Accessibility and Trip-making 6
Measuring accessibility The ease (in travel time) by which travelers and shippers can reach their destinations by various modes. Factors: Modal availability Speed (actual or perceived) Distance 9/21/16 Accessibility and Trip-making 7
Measuring accessibility The ease (in travel time) by which travelers and shippers can reach their destinations by various modes. Factors: Modal availability Speed (actual or perceived) Distance Vehicle speed (traditional measure) is a factor, but is no longer the primary desired outcome. 9/21/16 Accessibility and Trip-making 8
Calculating accessibility Network Land uses Method to calculate times 9/21/16 Accessibility and Trip-making 9
Decay factor (Dane County, Wisconsin) Calculating accessibility 100% 90% 80% 70% Auto Transit Walk Other All modes 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 Travel time to work (minutes) 9/21/16 Accessibility and Trip-making 10
Calculating accessibility 9/21/16 Accessibility and Trip-making 11
Calculating accessibility 9/21/16 Accessibility and Trip-making 12
Calculating accessibility 9/21/16 Accessibility and Trip-making 13
Calculating accessibility 9/21/16 Accessibility and Trip-making 14
Decay factor (Dane County, Wisconsin) Calculating accessibility 100% 90% 80% 70% Auto Transit Walk Other All modes 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 Travel time to work (minutes) 9/21/16 Accessibility and Trip-making 15
Decay factor (Dane County, Wisconsin) Calculating accessibility 100% 90% 80% 70% Auto Transit Walk Other All modes 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 Travel time to work (minutes) 9/21/16 Accessibility and Trip-making 16
Two primary metrics Non-work: access to groceries, parks, banks, restaurants and other non-work destinations 80 percent of trips, 70 percent of VMT Unit is a score up to 100 Work: access to jobs or a subset of jobs 20 percent of trips, 30 percent of VMT Unit is jobs 9/21/16 Accessibility and Trip-making 17
Destination Types Target Weight Restaurants, coffee shops, bars, pubs, wineries, and night life 8 40 General retail, book stores, and department stores 4 15 Groceries 2 15 Errands: Banks, pharmacies, and hardware stores 3 10 Parks, recreational areas, campgrounds, and golf courses 2 10 Schools 2 5 Cultural attractions, entertainment, and museums 1 5 9/21/16 Accessibility and Trip-making 18
9/21/16 Accessibility and Trip-making 19
9/21/16 Accessibility and Trip-making 20
9/21/16 Accessibility and Trip-making 21
9/21/16 Accessibility and Trip-making 22
accessible by transit Before After 5 min 0 0 10 min 1 1 15 min 1 1 30 min 71 1,183 45 min 189 9,136 60 min 733 42,184 Decay 114 5,779 9/21/16 Accessibility and Trip-making 23
Madison subdivision (approved) 9/21/16 Accessibility and Trip-making 24
Madison subdivision (original) 9/21/16 Accessibility and Trip-making 25
Station accessibility 9/21/16 Accessibility and Trip-making 26
Potential accessibility improvement 9/21/16 Accessibility and Trip-making 27
Impact score (based on households + jobs) 9/21/16 Accessibility and Trip-making 28
Virginia H.B. 2 (Smart Scale) 9/21/16 Accessibility and Trip-making 29
Caltrans Strategic Plan 9/21/16 Accessibility and Trip-making 30
Maryland mode share and VMT Transit accessibility for work Transit mode share for work 9/21/16 Accessibility and Trip-making 31
Maryland mode share and VMT Mode split prediction Mode choice at origin Auto % = 0.826 + (1.38E-07) MMA-A - (1.45E-06) MMA-T ( 6.71E-07) MMA-W Transit% = 0.052 - (1.23E-07) MMA-A + (1.41E-06) MMA-T + ( 9.48E-06) MMA-W Walk% = 0.003 + (2.98E-07) MMA-T + (1.89E-06) MMA-W Mode choice at destination Auto % = 0.984 + (4.54E-08) MMA-A - (8.45E-07) MMA-T ( 5.77E-06) MMA-W Transit% = 0.022 - (8.63E-08) MMA-A + (7.88E-07) MMA-T +( 4.75E-06) MMA-W Walk% = 0.003 + (1.20E-07) MMA-T +( 1.15E-06) MMA-W Where: MMA-A = Multimodal Accessibility Score for Auto MMA-T = Multimodal Accessibility Score for Transit MMA-W = Multimodal Accessibility Score for Walk 9/21/16 Accessibility and Trip-making 32
Measuring trip-making Anonymous GPS data Precise information not in travel demand models or traffic counts Summary More than 3 million trips per day in NOVA 51% < 5 miles 24% < 2 miles 8% < 1 mile 44% of short trips are during peak periods Streetlight Data 9/21/16 Accessibility and Trip-making 33
Methods 1. Scan GPS data for short trips, circuitous trips and common origin-destination pairs. 2. Identify case studies showing unique issues and opportunities. 3. Evaluate potential costs and benefits of recommended actions (using GPS data). 9/21/16 Accessibility and Trip-making 34
Denver: Short trips on freeways 7/29/16 Trip-making and accessibility 35
Denver: Potential Light Rail Trips 7/29/16 Trip-making and accessibility 36
Denver: Short internal trips 7/29/16 Trip-making and accessibility 37
Northern Virginia: Case studies 9/21/16 Accessibility and Trip-making 38
Northern Virginia: Tysons Corner 9/21/16 Accessibility and Trip-making 39
Northern Virginia: Tysons Corner Dulles Toll Road M M M M Opportunities Bicycle and pedestrian improvements Street and parcel connections Other local transportation options 9/21/16 Accessibility and Trip-making 40
Northern Virginia: Tysons Corner Benefits Enable walkable, transitoriented development Remove 3.8 million vehicle trips per year (1 million hours) Save $11.5 million in traveler costs per year Eliminate 8,400 tons of carbon emissions per year Costs $2.7 to 3.2 million (annualized) Circulator shuttle Street improvements and connections Bike share TDM and parking management 9/21/16 Accessibility and Trip-making 41
Northern Virginia: George Mason University 33% of trips 9/21/16 Accessibility and Trip-making 42
George Mason University Opportunities Off campus connections by foot, biking and transit Parking management Walkable development in surrounding area 9/21/16 Accessibility and Trip-making 43
Northern Virginia: George Mason University Benefits Improve multimodal access to campus Remove 460,000 vehicle trips per year (82,000 hours) Save $500,000 in traveler costs per year Eliminate 390 tons of carbon emissions per year Costs $0.9 to 1.0 million (annualized) Bike and pedestrian improvements Local shuttle/transit service TDM and parking management 9/21/16 Accessibility and Trip-making 44
Northern Virginia: Van Dorn Street Metro 9/21/16 Accessibility and Trip-making 45
Van Dorn Street Metro Van Dorn Street 9/21/16 Accessibility and Trip-making 46
Van Dorn Street Metro Opportunities Address accessibility needs without adding local traffic Limited-use crossings (bikes, pedestrians, etc.) M Van Dorn St Metro 9/21/16 Accessibility and Trip-making 47
Northern Virginia: Van Dorn Street Metro Benefits Improve multimodal access to station Remove 152,000 vehicle trips per year (24,500 hours) Save $155,000 in traveler costs per year Eliminate 113 tons of carbon emissions per year Costs $0.5 to 0.6 million (annualized) New infrastructure Modest increase in TDM 9/21/16 Accessibility and Trip-making 48
Opportunities for development Active transportation trip-making Accessibility and trip-making together Standards and practices Dissemination of tools and data Automation Advanced applications, e.g. modeling 9/21/16 Accessibility and Trip-making 57
Equity framework Data / input Accessibility measures (Sugar Access) Access to destinations Unit costs (e.g., auto ownership, transit costs) Affordability Transportation Livability Score Crash data Health / safety 9/21/16 Accessibility and Trip-making 58
Transportation Livability Score 9/21/16 Accessibility and Trip-making 59
Eric Sundquist SSTI Managing Director 608-265-6155 erics@ssti.us 9/21/16 Accessibility and Trip-making 60