Elgin G4 Leak. 25 March 16 May 2012

Similar documents
SPE Forum: Source Control for Wells in Shallow Water. Lars Herbst, Gulf of Mexico Regional Director

Wednesday, March 6, 2013 Houston, TX. 2:30 4:00 p.m. CLOSING SESSION BLOWOUT! A NIGHTMARE IN THE OIL PATCH

"Sharing To Be Better. Influx through failed cement in shoetrack during completion operations

OPERATING PROCEDURES

Rigless Cutting the Cost of Well Abandonments

Chapter 4 Key Findings. 4 Key Findings

AUSTRALIA ARGENTINA CANADA EGYPT NORTH SEA U.S. CENTRAL U.S. GULF. SEMS HAZARD ANALYSIS TRAINING September 29, 2011

7/27/2011. How Things Can Go Wrong In The Drilling Of Oil / Gas Wells

Captains Meeting 2009 Introduction to Well Testing- Expro. Edwin Schoorl

1. UPDATE 12/12/2014: What wells are regulated under the MIA Program? Must they be drilled, stimulated, and completed? Must they be in production?

Deepwater Horizon Incident Internal Investigation

RULES OF THE OIL AND GAS PROGRAM DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES CHAPTER DRILLING WELLS TABLE OF CONTENTS

Investigation of Loss of Well Control Eugene Island Block 277 OCS-G Well A-2 Off the Louisiana Coast July 6, 2001

WELL NO: BJN-8. Lower master valve

W I L D W E L L C O N T R O L FLUIDS

Practice Exam IADC WellSharp Driller and Supervisor

1. The well has been shut in on a kick and the kill operation has not started.

Coal Bed Methane (CBM) Permeability Testing

--- III. itti A. on_ coo. & EP Department DOCUMENT NO: WOC-HSE-ST Section H005 Hydrates

Drilling Efficiency Utilizing Coriolis Flow Technology

Squeeze Cementing. Brett W. Williams Cementing Technical Advisor January 2016 Tulsa API Meeting

COGCC OPERATOR GUIDANCE MECHANICAL INTEGRITY TEST GUIDANCE: PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES

Platelets & Plasma The Management of Unplanned Flow

Worker Seriously Injured Servicing a Plunger Lift System

GAP Tool Box Talk: Confined Spaces

Engineered solutions for complex pressure situations

SUPPLEMENT Well Control for Drilling Operations Workover & Completion for Supervisors Core Curriculum and Related Learning Objectives

Persistence pays off with subsea water shut off on Kinnoull Field. Alexandra Love, BP

Disposal/Injection Well Pressure Test Report (H-5)

HOT OILING OPERATIONS ALL HSE PRC 172. Approved By: Manager, HSE Performance Assurance. Table of Contents

Casing and Cementing Requirements

SUPPLEMENT Well Control for Drilling Operations Workover & Completion for Drillers Core Curriculum and Related Learning Objectives

TARPON A Minimal Facilities Platform

PROPOSED NEW SUB- CODE 1 RIG UP AND TEAR. Possibly Fits into Existing Code. 7/26/2018 Review PROPOSED NEW CODE EXISTING OPERATION

Introduction to Emergency Response & Contingency Planning

Extended leak off testing

APPENDIX D Oil Loading Pipeline - Options

OIL AND GAS PROCESSES AND EMISSIONS

AADE 2009NTCE-04-04: PRACTICAL ASPECTS AND VALUE OF AUTOMATED MPD IN HPHT WELLS

2016 PSE Tier 1 and 2 Events. Copyright of Shell International

3 MALFUNCTIONS AND ACCIDENTAL EVENTS. 3.1 Potential Malfunctions and Accident Events

Digester Processes. 1. Raw Sludge Pumping System

Well Control Drill Guide Example Only. Drill Guide is the list of drills, questions and attributes that are in DrillPad.

PETITION OF SHELL OIL COMPANY TO MAKE PERMANENT THE PRESENT SPECIAL FIELD RULES FOR THE SOUTHWEST PINEY

Reduce Turnaround Duration by Eliminating H 2 S from Flare Gas Utilizing VaporLock Scrubber Technology

Updates on CA Pipeline Safety Program

Annulus Communications Eliminated using Pressure- Activated Sealant

API MPMS Chapter 17.6 Guidelines for Determining the Fullness of Pipelines between Vessels and Shore Tanks

MIA Training Example (Catalano 2H)

FRAC FLUIDS AND WATER USAGE Evaluating The Commercial Viability and Success In Using Water-Free Fracs

NORSOK Standard D-010 Rev 4. August 2012

Commentary on the book by Andrew Hopkins. By Graham Dalzell

Best Practices - Coiled Tubing Deployed Ball Drop Type Perforating Firing Systems

Kerry A. Pollard Texstar Midstream Utility, LP Gallon E. Gray Phillip Zamzow EXAMINER S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Ball Beating Lubrication in Refrigetation Compressors

QUARTERLY ACTIVITIES REPORT. Successful drilling of Primero West-1 well and Nyanda-4 corehole.

INTRODUCTION UNIFIED COMMAND

Study Guide IADC WellSharp Driller and Supervisor

Pile Gripper Systems

Fire and Safety for Offshore drilling and production Ajey Walavalkar ANSYS Inc.

Well Control Modeling Software Comparisons with Single Bubble Techniques in a Vertical Well

SAN JUAN BASIN: SUBPART W & WELL-SITE DATA

UGER Oilfield Rental Solutions EMERGENCY OPERATING PROCEDURES

Emerging Issues in the Oil and Gas Industry

the annulus between the second casing string and the surface casing [must be] open to the atmosphere in the manner described in subsection (2).

Success Paths: A Risk Informed Approach to Oil & Gas Well Control

Industry Code: Alberta Small Employer OHS Legislated Requirements

INSTRUCTIONS FOR USING THE RISK ASSESSMENT FORM

The purpose of this policy is to provide operational guidelines for San Diego County Fire Departments (FD) responses to natural gas incidents.

Blowout during Workover Operation A case study Narration by: Tarsem Singh & Arvind Jain, OISD

CHE Well Testing Package/Service:

SAFETY PIPELINE. Simonette Expansion Pipeline Project

DB Bridge Plug. Features. Benefits. Applications

Chapter 5 HORIZONTAL DRILLING

Well Integrity - Christmas Tree Acceptable Leakage Rate and Sustained Casing Pressure

Risk-Based Process Safety for Upstream Oil & Gas: Put Your Boots on It s Coming! Mark Hansen and Jim Johnstone

Piper Alpha Case Study: June Credited to ConocoPhillips Project Development

APPENDIX 2. ACG PHASE III Proposed HSE Design Standards

JOSOP 603 flaring and venting Standard

Debris Management Drilling Tools

Working Environment Safety Assessment

Air and Gas Drilling

PSM TRAINING COURSES. Courses can be conducted in multi-languages

HydroPull. Extended-Reach Tool. Applications

PETROLEUM & GAS PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY (PTT 365) SEPARATION OF PRODUCED FLUID

Talk 2 Tree & Wellhead Valve Testing Leak Rate Acceptance. Talk 3 DHSV Control Line hydrocarbon Ingress measurement & acceptability

Fundamentals Of Petroleum Engineering PRODUCTION

MASTER S THESIS. A Discussion of Well Control Methods. Faculty of Science and Technology. Study program/ Specialization: Spring semester, 2013

1 Scope... 2 Functions of cementing float equipment... 3 Definitions... 4 Calibration... 5 Test Categories... 6 General...

EXAMINER S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION STATEMENT OF THE CASE

When you complete this module you will be able to: Describe procedures needed to enter into, or work safely in confined spaces.

DIRECTIONAL DRILLING

Transient Analyses In Relief Systems

OIL INDIA LIMITED KG BASIN PROJECT KAKINADA

Process Safety Management Of Highly Hazardous Chemicals OSHA 29 CFR

Aasta Hansteen. Operational Experiences. FFU Seminar 28 th January Tom-Erik Henriksen

Development of a Subsurface Mudline Packer to Reduce Risk of Flow after Cementing and Sustained Casing Pressure, While Providing a Platform for P&A.

Section Five Lockout Tagout Confined Space. Oil & Gas Training. Oil & Gas Training. Oil & Gas Training. Lockout Tagout

Recommended minimum functional specifications and standards for geothermal wells in the Netherlands v.5

Why Do Not Disturb Is a Safety Message for Well Integrity

Transcription:

Elgin G4 Leak 25 March 16 May 2012

Elgin: key facts & figures Operated by Total for 8 x JV partners Production Utilities Quarters (PUQ) & wellhead platforms linked by 90m bridge On stream since 2001 6 producing wells from 4 HP/HT fields Produced 135k boe/d in 2011 2

Elgin G4: well architecture Well head deck on Elgin A platform Seabed @ 93m below platform Chalk HOD non-producing low permeability high pressure Fulmar producing high permeability lower pressure 3

Elgin G4 leak: build-up 25 Feb: sudden decrease of A annulus pressure and rapid increase in B and then C annulus G4 Task Force established: well intervention prepared with Rowan Viking rig support 15 March: tubing and A annulus contents displaced to 1.2sg brine 22-25 March: well killing start pumping 2.05sg OBM down tubing & up A annulus B & C annuli pressure increase C annulus bled off through WHP process B annulus operating window increased after 172m 3 operation suspended as mud returns to the process via C annulus attempt to re-route C annulus returns line to surge tank sudden unsustainable C & B annuli pressure increase - leading to gas release at well head D annulus 4 Specialised team mobilised to complete thorough incident investigation

Elgin G4 leak: day one (25 March) 12.20: gas & condensate leak confirmed at the wellhead on Elgin s G4 well 13.30: evacuation begins of Elgin and the adjacent Rowan Viking drilling rig 16.40: 219 people have now been evacuated leaving 19 still on the complex 01.45: Elgin OIM decides to fully abandon Platform, rig & wells shut down - but flare still lit Export pipelines isolated 02.30: the last 19 people are evacuated All 238 people safely and quickly evacuated 5

Elgin G4 leak: initial impacts Gas, condensate & mud released via D annulus Visible gas plume formed Condensate & mud falls to sea Sheen covers a large area of sea surface Waxy paraffinic deposits on wellhead platform 6

Elgin G4 leak: initial response Informed all appropriate Authorities Mobilised Emergency & Crisis Response Teams Oil Pollution Emergency Plan (OPEP) activated Enforced sea & air exclusion zones (2 & 3 N miles) Mobilised a fleet of safety & support vessels The Skandi Aker well intervention vessel Dispersant ships and planes put on standby Recruited Wild Well Control to assist Mobilised Oil Spill Response Limited (OSRL) The Ocean Ness Emergency Response & Rescue Vessel 7

Elgin G4 leak: options to regain well control Preferred Option: a pumped well kill operation a mobile pumping unit putting heavy mud directly into G4 from the wellhead technically feasible re-boarding of the Elgin wellhead platform necessary Wild Well Control already mobilised and suitably experienced no absolute guarantee of success timescale measured in weeks Back-up Option: drill a relief well a contingency in the event the well kill is ineffective technically feasible start drillng two wells and use the one that reaches the interception point first two drilling rigs (Rowan Gorrilla V & Sedco 714) already on Total s books success virtually assured timescale measured in months 8

Elgin G4 leak: options to regain well control 9

Elgin G4 leak: post incident milestones (1) 29 March: OSRL flights reveal size of sheen has already diminished considerably 30 March: flare is confirmed as extinguished 2 April: well kill & relief well options announced 5 April: first re-boarding of Elgin complex by Wild Well Control & Total E&P UK teams The Sedco 714 drilling rig 15 April: mobilisation of West Phoenix drilling rig & Skandi Aker as main well kill support vessels 18 April: Sedco 714 spuds first relief well 26 April: special diverter fitted to G4 well head Fitting the diverter was a game changer The diverter on the G4 wellhead 10

Elgin G4 leak: post incident milestones (2) Successful removal of waxy deposits Laying of 230m of chiksan pipeline 10 May: West Phoenix drilling rig alongside 10/15 May: extensive equipment testing 15 May: Well kill operation begins The West Phoenix; the main well kill support vessel Daily cleaning operations on the Elgin well head platform Chiksan temporary rigid pipeline 11

Elgin G4 leak: well kill set-up Pre-kill testing, using Coflex from West Phoenix to Elgin PUQ 12

Elgin G4 leak: well kill operation Nearing the end of the well kill operation 13

Elgin G4 leak: well kill operation Dynamic well kill with 2.05sg mud Initially pumped water based mud (WBM) Pumped through G4 wellhead into tubing 1000m 3 pumped @ a rate of 8-12bbls/min Pumped via Coflex & chiksan from West Phoenix Pumping for 12 hours No diversion: pumped fluids exited to sea After 5 days, WBM replaced with oil based mud G4 now stable and under observation 14

Elgin G4 leak: current status The well has been killed and is filled with oil based mud The well & gas leak path are under control Progressive re-manning of the Elgin complex & the Rowan Viking is underway The West Phoenix will be demobilised once the Rowan Viking s pumps are available As a contingency, drilling of relief well 1 to continue for now But a decision taken not to drill relief well 2 Other Elgin/Franklin wells being monitored 15

Elgin G4 leak: environmental impacts Environment Monitoring Activities 2 Oil Spill Response Limited (OSRL) flights per day to monitor marine pollution Regular survey flights by the National Centre for Atmospheric Science (NCAS) Daily water samples taken in Elgin surroundings Leak flow rate estimated at an initial 2kg/s but quickly fell to less than 0.6kg/s Gas composition: 70% methane + 30% ethane, butane, etc; no H2S traces Surface sheen extended many kms, but was less than 1/10 th of a micron thick Light condensate that disperses naturally and easily: 50% evaporation in the first 24 hours alone Several independent chemical, sediment and & fish analyses confirmed no direct marine contamination (eg, Scottish Government, etc) Widespread consensus that the environmental impacts are minimal 16

Elgin G4 leak: next steps Fully re-man the Elgin complex, including on-board sleeping, etc Re-man the Rowan Viking drilling rig and get its pumps working Continue to deep clean the Elgin complex, power up & test on board systems Demobilise the West Phoenix (when Rowan Viking s pumps are working) Set a 50m cement plug in well G4 as part of abandonment process Stop drilling relief well (when cement plug in place) Co-operate fully with on going HSE investigation Work towards gradual resumption of normal operations Adopt lessons learned and share with the wider industry 17

Thank you for listening any questions?