FOURTH STREET WILMINGTON WALKABLE COMMUNITY WORKSHOP

Similar documents
Introduction. Who is WILMAPCO. Why are walkable communities important

WEST SIDE WILMINGTON WALKABLE COMMUNITY WORKSHOP

MIDDLETOWN WALKABLE COMMUNITY WORKSHOP

APPENDIX A: Complete Streets Checklist DRAFT NOVEMBER 2016

NJDOT Complete Streets Checklist

A CHANGING CITY. of Edmonton, it is essential that it reflects the long-term vision of the City.

12/4/2016 VIA . RE: Grocery Outlet Del Paso (DR16-328)

City of Birmingham Draft Multi-modal Transportation Plan

Omaha s Complete Streets Policy

o n - m o t o r i z e d transportation is an overlooked element that can greatly enhance the overall quality of life for the community s residents.

Perryville TOD and Greenway Plan

Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC) November 21, 2013

MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. WAY

CONNECTIVITY PLAN. Adopted December 5, 2017 City of Virginia Beach

Executive Summary Route 30 Corridor Master Plan

Tonight is for you. Learn everything you can. Share all your ideas.

Active Transportation Facility Glossary

CITY OF BLOOMINGTON COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

Item to be Addressed Checklist Consideration YES NO N/A Required Description Complete Streets Guidelines

Morristown, NJ Complete Streets Policy

CONNECTING PEOPLE TO PLACES

INDOT Complete Streets Guideline & Policy

Agenda. Overview PRINCE GEORGE S PLAZA METRO AREA PEDESTRIAN PLAN

7/23/2017 VIA . Michael Hanebutt City of Sacramento Community Development Department 300 Richards Boulevard, 3 rd Floor Sacramento, CA 95811

Oakland Pedestrian Master Plan Oakland Pedestrian Plan Draft Recommendations Chapter Outline

Chapter 2: Standards for Access, Non-Motorized, and Transit

CML s 91 st Annual Conference June 18 21, 2013 Vail, Colorado. Why a Campaign? Learn More. City of Brush! 6/13/2013

9/21/2016 VIA . RE: The Knot (DR16-270)

Bikeway action plan. Bicycle Friendly Community Workshop March 5, 2007 Rochester, MN

PEDESTRIAN ACTION PLAN

Streetscape: Core Shopping District

Steps to Conducting a Complete Streets Assessment

10/30/2012 VIA

Use this guide to learn more about walkability and how you can make your community safer to walk

COMPLETE STREETS PLANNER S PORTFOLIO

Chapter 5. Complete Streets and Walkable Communities.

REGIONAL BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN DESIGN GUIDELINES

STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING June 17, Streetscape Overview Burlington Comprehensive Master Plan

6/14/2013 VIA . Evan Compton, Associate Planner Community Development Department City of Sacramento 300 Richards Blvd Sacramento, CA 95814

Design Guidelines. Overview. Design Vision for Yellow Brick Road

5 Circulation & Parking

Proposed. City of Grand Junction Complete Streets Policy. Exhibit 10

What Is a Complete Street?

Living Streets Policy

MAG Town of Cave Creek Bike Study Task 6 Executive Summary and Regional Significance Report

PRINCE GEORGE S PLAZA METRO AREA PEDESTRIAN PLAN

RESOLUTION NO ?? A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF NEPTUNE BEACH ADOPTING A COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

COWETA HIGH SCHOOL AND EAST HIGHWAY 51

5/7/2013 VIA . RE: University Village Safeway Expansion (P13-019)

TOWN OF PORTLAND, CONNECTICUT COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

Roosevelt Estates Neighborhood Improvements

14 TH STREET TRANSPORTATION & STREETSCAPE DESIGN STUDY PLAN B PLAN B TRANSPORTATION & STREETSCAPE RECOMMENDATIONS

City of Novi Non-Motorized Master Plan 2011 Executive Summary

Ann Arbor Downtown Street Plan

Clarkson Walkability Audit: Results and Recommendations Summary

Chapter 4 TOOLBOX AND SAMPLE BIKE BOULEVARD LAYOUT

A. Pedestrian Facility Design

7 Complete Streets & Roadway Aesthetics

S T A T I O N A R E A P L A N

8/31/2016 VIA . RE: Freeport Arco Fuel Station (P16-039)

CITY OF COCOA BEACH 2025 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. Section VIII Mobility Element Goals, Objectives, and Policies

11/3/2014 VIA . WALKSacramento has reviewed the Stockton and T Mixed-Use project at 3675 T Street in the

Elm Street Business District: Streetscape and Signage Plan

Safe Routes to School: Munroe Elementary Walk Audit Report. Image: Drexel, Barrell & Co.

Watertown Complete Streets Prioritization Plan. Public Meeting #1 December 14, 2017

CURBSIDE ACTIVITY DESIGN

Chapter 6: Along the Street

Appendix 3 Roadway and Bike/Ped Design Standards

Walk Friendly Communities Engineering Strategies. Carl Sundstrom Walk Friendly Communities Workshop Grandview, MO June 2015

City of Albert Lea Policy and Procedure Manual 4.10 ALBERT LEA CROSSWALK POLICY

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Vision

Bicycle Facilities Planning

5/31/2016 VIA . Arwen Wacht City of Sacramento Community Development Department 300 Richards Blvd., 3 rd Floor Sacramento, CA 95811

City of Davis East Covell Corridor Plan


5 CIRCULATION AND STREET DESIGN

PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION & STREETSCAPE DESIGN

BROOKLAND Multi-Modal Transportation & Streetscape Study* NE Washington, DC

10/8/2014 VIA . RE: CVS Pharmacy (P13-002) Revised August 2014

Chapter VISION, MISSION, AND GOALS AND OBJECTIVES. Vision. Mission. Goals and Objectives CONNECTING COMMUNITIES ACROSS THE ST.

3/10/2016 VIA th Street, Suite 203 Sacramento, CA

MAKE YOUR PLACE IN CHANNELSIDE

David Hung, Associate Planner City of Sacramento Community Development Department 300 Richards Boulevard, 3 rd Floor Sacramento, CA

6/22/2018 VIA . Darcy Goulart, Planning Manager City of Rancho Cordova Planning Department 2729 Prospect Park Drive Rancho Cordova, CA 95670

Safe Routes to School: Valverde Elementary Walk Audit Report. Image: CPLIVE, SkyscraperPage.com

Solana Beach Comprehensive Active Transportation Strategy (CATS)

Ocean Park Boulevard Green Street Project Alternatives & Trade Offs

FOCUS AREA 1 - Alberta Avenue Pocket Park 3 (121 Ave and 92 St)

Introduction. North 12 th Complete Street Project Overview

Broad Street Bicycle Boulevard Design Guidelines

Complete Streets Successes, Opportunities, and Challenges

See Figure 38, Existing Nonmotorized Connections.

Chapter 3: Multi-Modal Circulation and Streetscapes

Chapter 2. Bellingham Bicycle Master Plan Chapter 2: Policies and Actions

Bicycle Master Plan Goals, Strategies, and Policies

II. Identification of Opportunities and Solutions. A. Short-term action plan (Summary of Recommendations)

City of Wilsonville 5 th Street to Kinsman Road Extension Project

STONY PLAIN ROAD STREETSCAPE

Transportation Planning Division

Streets. Safe for Pedestrians 20% 2nd 5,000. Are We People-Friendly?

Transcription:

FOURTH STREET WILMINGTON WALKABLE COMMUNITY WORKSHOP June 24, 2015 Hosted by Cornerstone West & WILMAPCO Walkable Community Workshops are interactive events that bring together the community and transportation professionals to focus attention on making it safer and easier to walk. Workshop participants identified realworld problems and hands-on solutions for the community.

Table of Contents INTRODUCTION...1 WHO IS WILMAPCO?...1 WHY ARE WALKABLE COMMUNITIES IMPORTANT?...1 WHAT IS A WALKABLE COMMUNITY WORKSHOP?...3 FOURTH STREET WILMINGTON BACKGROUND AND RECOMMENDATIONS...4 Area Background...4 Summary of Recommendations...7 Getting along the street...7 Getting across the street... 10 Transit... 13 Bicycle Routes... 14 Aesthetics and Beyond... 15 FUNDING AND IMPLEMENTATION RESOURCES... 17 APPENDIX: BEYOND THE WALKABLE COMMUNITY WORKSHOP Learn more about the Walkable Community Workshop Program at www.wilmapco.org/walkable Thanks to the University of Delaware Institute for Public Administration for providing photos from the Workshop. The preparation of this document was financed in part with funds provided by the Federal Government, including the Federal Transit Administration and the Federal Highway Administration of the United States Department of Transportation.

INTRODUCTION WILMAPCO was selected for the 2005 Walkable Community Workshops (WCW) program part of the National Center for Bicycling & Walking effort to work directly with communities. WCWs are interactive events that bring together residents, elected officials, advocates, public agency staff, health practitioners, educators, planners and engineers to make our communities safer and easier to walk in. Since 2005, workshops have been held throughout the WILMAPCO region, providing information on how we can turn our communities into the kind of pedestrianfriendly places we all like to experience. WHO IS WILMAPCO? The Wilmington Area Planning Council (WILMAPCO) is the bi-state Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) serving New Castle County, DE and Cecil County, MD. Our policy-making body, the WILMAPCO Council, consists of state, county and municipal representatives. We have the important role of educating and involving the public and local agencies in the transportation decision-making and funding process. Our Regional Transportation Plan calls for improving our quality of life by protecting public health and supporting our communities, transporting people by providing transportation choices including facilities for bicycling and walking, and supporting economic activity and growth by making our region an attractive place to live and work. Making our communities more walkable achieves all these goals, and more. WHY ARE WALKABLE COMMUNITIES IMPORTANT? We are all pedestrians. Whether we think of ourselves as one or not, we are pedestrians. We may walk to work, walk for exercise, walk to do errands or simply walk from where we park the car to the neighborhood store; we all need safe facilities for walking. Walking is crucial to give those who don t drive a travel choice. Many in our region are too young to drive, have a permanent or temporary disability which prevents their driving, have no access to a car, or choose not to drive. In Wilmington, Delaware, 24% of the population is under 18, 12% are over 65 (this number is expected to grow rapidly in the years to come), 15% of the population has a disability, and 27% of households have no available vehicle. Many people in these population groups need to walk in order to lead active and independent lives. Page 1

Walkable communities are healthier communities. Americans waistlines are getting wider, triggering a rise in related illnesses including heart disease and diabetes. The Centers for Disease Control estimates that in Delaware 27% of adults are obese, only 46% of adults engage in the recommended amount of physical activity, and 22% of adults engage in no leisure time physical activity at all. Additionally, only 24% of adolescents get the recommended amount of physical activity. Yet we know that pedestrian-friendly communities make it easier for people to integrate physical activity into their daily lives. Indeed, those who report having access to sidewalks are 27% more likely to be physically active. Everyone benefits from walkable communities. Even if you don t personally enjoy walking, you still benefit from living in a walkable community. Approximately 40 percent of all trips are less than two miles an easy walk or bike ride in an area with safe pedestrian and bicycling facilities. More people walking and bicycling can help reduce overall levels of congestion, benefiting drivers too. Less driving can also help reduce air pollution caused by motor vehicles. There are economic benefits as well, with higher property values and greater sales in commercial areas. Page 2

WHAT IS A WALKABLE COMMUNITY WORKSHOP? A WCW is typically a four hour session that includes an educational presentation on what makes a community walkable, a walking audit of a specific area, and a mapping session, where participants engage in brainstorming solutions. Focusing on a particular area s walkability, participants study sidewalks, pathways, inviting streetscape, crosswalks, destinations, etc. The process gives everyone the tools for making a community walkable and provides realistic next steps that can be used to achieve their ideas. There are three main parts of a workshop: Part 1: Presentation The presentation talks about sidewalk design, crosswalks, traffic calming, community design and other tools communities need to create walkable communities. Part 2: Walking Audit The walking audit gives participants a chance to walk through the area, identifying issues and thinking about applying what they have learned from the presentation. Getting out and walking is key to illustrating the challenges that people face when pedestrian facilities are not available. Part 3: Mapping During the mapping exercise people put down on paper their vision and realistic actions for improving the study area. Participants ended the session by committing to specific next steps to continue the process started at the workshop. Page 3

FOURTH STREET WILMINGTON BACKGROUND AND RECOMMENDATIONS Area Background The greater West Side community is home to more than 500 businesses, restaurants, and health care providers, 13,000 residents, and community gathering space including parks, the Woodlawn Library, and the West End Neighborhood House. Approximately 30 residents, business representatives, community organizations and transportation professionals attended the 4 th Street WCW held on June 24, 2015 in the Fourth Street neighborhood of the West Side community at the Westside Health Center. The walking audit route (Map 1) began at the Westside Health Center and then traveled on 4 th Street between Scott Street and Rodney Street, Rodney Street between 3 rd and 4 th Streets, and 3 rd Street between Rodney and Scott Streets. The Fourth Street WCW builds upon past planning in the community, particularly the West Side Grows Together Neighborhood Revitalization Plan. This plan outlined a collaborative vision for the community and identified safer, more attractive, pedestrianfriendly streets as a priority. Specifically, the plan stated that one necessary improvement of the district is to give it a stronger pedestrian atmosphere that would attract more customers by making it safe and easy for them to visit, park and walk around. Elements of the plan s 4 th Street recommendations that most relate to walkability include: Economic Development - COLLABORATION o Organize 4th Street Collaborative to invest in community and people o Form a 4th Street Revitalization entity Economic Development - PUBLIC SAFETY/MAINTENANCE o Clean the corridor o Target crime in the area Page 4

Economic Development - PROMOTION o Reposition and rebrand the corridor o Hold more events year round o Launch community markets Economic Development - PHYSICAL IMPROVEMENTS o Improve existing homes and businesses o Consider re-zoning 4th Street o Target redevelopment to support emerging commercial corridor o Encourage new businesses to locate in target area by offering incentives o Improve 4th Street to make it safer and more attractive o Improve and redesign I-95 ramp at 4th Street o Inaugurate a big impact public art project PUBLIC TRANSIT o Target bus shelter improvements on commercial corridors and near parks and institutions o Consider bus bulbs along 2nd and 4th street to decrease travel time o Consider consolidated stops on 4th Street to improve travel times PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIONS o Add pedestrian signals and crosswalks o Calm traffic for pedestrian safety o Improve pedestrian connections over and under I-95 o Create walking routes that connect amenities BICYCLING NETWORK o Create a bike network that links the West Side and the City o Install bike parking at institutions, on commercial corridors, and at parks o Create a community bike center for maintenance and education o Organize a bike club for group rides Page 5

Map 1 Study Area Page 6

Summary of Recommendations Workshop attendees divided into two groups and completed a walking audit along the route shown in Map 1. Following the walking audit, participants divided into two groups to brainstorm and map their recommendations. Maps 2, 3 and 4 summarize the discussion by the two groups. Highlights of the discussion along the walk and during the mapping include: Getting along the street Most sidewalks on 4 th Street are wide but lack pedestrian street lighting and landscaping. Beautiful trees such as these along 3 rd Street enhance the walking experience but care should be taken to ensure trees don t obscure street lights. Sidewalks Sidewalks in the area studied vary in width and character. Sidewalks should be at least 5 feet wide in residential areas, but in commercial areas 8 feet or wider is preferred. Wider sidewalks provide space for outdoor dining, benches, bicycle racks, sandwich boards and trash cans separate from where people are walking. Along 4th Street, sidewalks are sufficiently width for a commercial district, but some sections lack landscaping, bus shelters, pedestrian-scale lighting. Along Rodney, 3 rd and Scott Streets, sidewalk widths vary but most have sufficient widths for residential streets; these streets have short sections with street trees but mostly lack landscaping and lighting. Throughout the area studied, many of the sidewalks are in poor condition, with cracked and crumbling concrete. Poor sidewalk conditions present access challenges for those with wheel chairs, vision problems, strollers, and other users, and are particularly dangerous as tripping hazards at night due to the lack of street lights. Page 7

Map 2 Recommendations: Getting Along the Street Page 8

Driveway improvements Driveways present another challenge for walking. Sidewalks that remain level are preferred to sidewalks that slope down at each driveway. Some sidewalks slope at driveways and do not meet ADA guidelines if the grade of the slope is more than 2%. The sidewalk can wrap around the driveway ramp if needed to remain level, however this presents a challenge for those who have visual impairments. The photos below show example driveway designs. Example of level sidewalk with driveway apron using the planting strip Photos: www.pedbikeimages.org/ Dan Burden Example of sidewalk wrapped around driveway Lighting Pedestrian scale streetlights are missing from most of the corridor. While there are some cobra head street lights, these are sometimes blocked by trees and often fail to illuminate the sidewalks. The cobra head lights may be retrofitted to incorporate pedestrian scale lighting (e.g., shorter light poles and/or lower light fixtures that are designed to be effective in illuminating the pedestrian travel way). Design should be coordinated to match lights at other locations along the 4 th Street corridor. Cobra head street light Pedestrian scale light Page 9

Getting across the street Signalized crossings with crosswalks on 4 th Street are at Rodney, Clayton, DuPont and Scott streets, while 3 rd Street has no signals or marked crosswalks. Crossing 4th Street currently presents a challenge to the pedestrian friendliness of the area due to its four-lane width. Curbs can be extended with bump outs to reduce this distance, make crossing pedestrians more visible to drivers, and protecting parked cars. Bump-outs will also help with the issue of cars parking to too close to the intersections. Crosswalks At minimum, crosswalks should be striped as wide as or wider than the sidewalk it connects to and use high-visibility markings that contrast with the pavement and are reflective at night. Crosswalks along 4th Street are marked at all signalized intersections and at no unsignalized location. Some signalized side streets do not have marked crosswalks. Participants noticed people crossing at unmarked locations. Crosswalks should be added to all side streets and intersections along 3 rd Street. Page 10

Map 3 Recommendations: Getting Across the Street Page 11

Crosswalks can also be installed using materials to add color and texture helping to give unique character to the neighborhood. This can be done using textured and/or colored concrete or high friction surface epoxy. Some examples are below. Corners The design of the corner should provide access for all pedestrians including persons with disabilities, make drivers and those waiting to cross visible to one another, deduce the distance needed to cross and reduce excessive turning speeds by drivers. Most locations lack curb ramps that meet ADA standards. Curb ramps are important, not only for those persons with disabilities, but for others who may be pushing strollers, or rolling shopping carts, luggage, etc. Working with DelDOT and Wilmington Department of Public Works, ADA curb ramps installed should be installed at all intersections. When possible, ramps should be installed for each crosswalk direction, rather than a single ramp per corner. Page 12

Bump-outs (or curb extensions) serve several important roles; with bump-outs drivers and pedestrians can clearly see one another, the distance to cross is significantly reduced and parking is protected. Larger bump-outs provide space for benches, planters, trash cans and other needs. Signals Existing and potential signals should be review with DelDOT Traffic to identify ways they can improve the walkability of the community. Improvements to consider at existing signals include: Shorten signal lengths if feasible, to reduce the wait time for pedestrians. Coordinate signal timing to give green wave for drivers traveling at the speed limit. Leading Pedestrian Interval gives pedestrians a 3 7 second head start when entering an intersection with a corresponding green signal in the same direction of travel. A HAWK or High-Intensity Activated crosswalk beacon (left) or Rectangular Flashing Beacon (right) is used to stop traffic only as needed. The signal remains unlit when not in use. Transit Transit riders are pedestrians and must walk to reach bus stops and cross the street to reach destinations. DART Route 4 and 24 travels east-west on Fourth Street. Location of bus stops should be reviewed to make sure they are located close to safe places to cross. Benches, shelters and trash cans make waiting for the bus more comfortable. Locating bus stops at bump-outs help bus drivers spot waiting riders. Page 13

Bicycle Routes No streets within the study area are signed as bicycle routes. The nearest designated east-west routes are SR 48 and SR 52. Near the study area, Broom Street is a suggested north-south route but lacks accompanying pavement markings and signage. Types of bicycle facilities are described as follows. Bicycle lanes should be 4-6 feet wide. If there is more space, a painted buffer might also be added as shown to the left. Space for bicycle lanes might be gained from the Road Diet, narrowing the width of motor vehicle lanes to 10-11 feet, or narrowing parking lanes to 7-8 feet. Sharrows, or Shared Lane Markings, accommodate bicyclists on lower volume, lower speed streets without sufficient width for bicycle lanes. Sharrows also assist bicyclists with proper lane positioning relative to the curb and on-street parking. Lower volume streets can be designed as Bicycle Boulevards. Bicycle Boulevards use a mix of signs, pavement markings, and traffic calming measures to discourage through trips by motor vehicles, create safe, convenient bicycle crossings of arterial streets, and give bicycles travel priority. Page 14

Aesthetics and Beyond Compared with other areas in Westside Wilmington, the Fourth Street corridor lacks community defining elements. Places to sit, street lighting, public art, trash cans, and wayfinding information can elevate the character of a safe pedestrian environment into a more distinctive place and more vital, cohesive community. Examples shown below are from the nearby Little Italy neighborhood and include public art, planters, street trees, interpretive signs and outdoor dining. Landscaping can also serve duel function as a buffered bump out around on street parking and even environmentally friendly stormwater management. Page 15

Map 4 Recommendations: Transit, Aesthetics and Beyond Page 16

Blank surfaces such as walls and traffic signal boxes, that might otherwise attract graffiti, can become canvases for local artists or even display art from student art classes. Photo: www.seattle.gov Outdoor dining was also identified as something that can be expanded. Given the limited sidewalk width, parklets can transform off-street parking spaces into temporary outdoor seating. Parklets combine modular decking with railings, planters, and seating to create seasonal cafes. Narrow café seating located close to buildings may be another option. Photo: universitycity.org/parklets Pop-up events can take place in vacant lots or parking lots using local musician and food carts. Other place-making elements that can be installed thoughout the business district include banners, decorative bus shelters and benches, directional signs, and distinctive colored/pattern crosswalks or intersections (subject to approved colors in MUTCD). Participants discussed use of vacant lots to provide other enhancements to the area. Community gardens and land banking for redevelopment where ideas discussed. Other short-term ideas were planting sunflowers and adding a little library. Photo:gtechstrategies.org/ projects/sunflowers Photo: www.pinterest.com/ susanmooney/little-free-libraries FUNDING AND IMPLEMENTATION RESOURCES Page 17

Funding Programs and Contacts City of Wilmington City of Wilmington Department of Public Works is a good starting point for most recommendations from the Walkable Community Workshop. The Director for Transportation and Streets, David Blankenship, can be contacted at dblanken@ci.wilmington.de.us or (302)576 3086. DelDOT DelDOT administers the Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP). TAP offer funding opportunities to help expand transportation choices and enhance the transportation experience, formerly known as the Transportation Enhancements (TE) Program. TAP Activities must relate to surface transportation. Eligible projects most related to the Walkable Communities include: Construction, planning, and design of on-road and off-road trail facilities for pedestrians, bicyclists, and other nonmotorized forms of transportation Construction, planning, and design of infrastructure-related projects and systems that will provide safe routes for non-drivers, including children, older adults, and individuals with disabilities to access daily needs Safe routes to school program In Delaware, projects require a twenty percent funding match. Delaware TE Coordinator Jeff Niezgoda Delaware Department of Transportation, PO Box 778, Dover, DE 19903 Tel: 302-760-2178 Fax: 302-739-2251 Email: Jeff.Niezgoda@state.de.us Web: www.wilmapco.org/tap State Elected Officials Community Transportation Fund (CTF) funding provides a fixed amount of funds annually to each State Senator and House Representative to be used as they and their constituents believe is best for transportation improvements within their district. Legislators may also fund their own project ideas and they have the option of banking a portion of their yearly CTF budget for up to three years in order to fund a larger transportation improvement. www.deldot.gov/information/pubs_forms/brochures/pdf/ctf_brochure.pdf Page 18

Other Useful Links Pedestrian and Bicycle Information Center - www.pedbikeinfo.org League of American Bicyclists - www.bikeleague.org National Center for Bicycling and Walking - www.bikewalk.org Federal Highway Administration - www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/bikeped/index.htm Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) - mutcd.fhwa.dot.gov NACTO Urban Street Design Guide - nacto.org/usdg WILMAPCO - www.wilmapco.org/walk Page 19

850 Library Avenue, Suite 100 Newark, DE 19711 (302)737-6205 www.wilmapco.org