Forest Service Travel Management Rule Status and Directives NOHVCC/NAOPM Conference Houston, TX March 26, 2009

Similar documents
FOREST SERVICE MANUAL NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS (WO) WASHINGTON, DC

FOREST SERVICE MANUAL NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS (WO) WASHINGTON, DC

FOREST SERVICE MANUAL

Engineering Report: Apache-Sitgreaves National Forests. Black Mesa Ranger District. Analysis of. National Forest System Roads (NFSRs) #s 504 & 169

FOREST SERVICE HANDBOOK NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS (WO) WASHINGTON, DC

'30"W '25"W 82 43'20"W 94B 94C 94C1 56 NOLICHUCKY

CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN P.O. Box 710. RECEIPT REQUESTED Tucson, AZ NUMBER:

Nebraska National Forests and Grasslands Bessey Ranger District Motorized Trail Width Project

Description of Road Management Objectives, Existing Use, and Proposed Use:

Description of Road Management Objectives, Existing Use, and Proposed Use:

Itasca County ATV Policy/Ordinance Public Input Meeting. February 6, 2017 Marcell Family Center February 8, 2017 Itasca County Courthouse

Tahoe National Forest; Placer County, California; Squaw Valley to Alpine Meadows. Notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement.

September 7, November 29, PSI MVUM EIS Travel Management Team Pike & San Isabel National Forests 2840 Kachina Dr.

Nez Perce National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan Amendment No. 40

Guidelines for Engineering Analysis of Motorized Mixed Use on National Forest System Roads

Summary of Research RESULTS SAFETY TRAINING. Selected Results From a 2006 Survey of Registered Off-Highway Vehicle (OHV) Owners in Montana YES 44%

Parks and Recreation Division. Public Boat Ramps Work Session

RECORD OF DECISION for the Mountain City, Ruby Mountains, and Jarbidge Ranger Districts Combined Travel Management Project

Korell Outfitter and Guide Special-Use Permit Amendment

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY BOARD OF DIRECTORS. RESOLUTION No

Gordon Proctor Director Policy on Accommodating Bicycle and Pedestrian Travel on ODOT Owned or Maintained Facilities

5. RUNNINGWAY GUIDELINES

Zlatko Krstulich, P.Eng. City of O9awa

DRAFT RULE Specific Regulations for Wildlife Management Areas North Central Region Agenda Item 12A December 13, 2018

Request for Proposals Contra Costa County Contra Costa Centre I 680/Treat Boulevard Bicycle & Pedestrian Plan

TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL GUIDELINES FOR HIGHWAY-RAIL GRADE CROSSINGS

PRINCE GEORGE S PLAZA METRO AREA PEDESTRIAN PLAN

Agenda. Overview PRINCE GEORGE S PLAZA METRO AREA PEDESTRIAN PLAN

Big Cypress National Preserve. Hunting Management Plan /

CHAPTER 1 PURPOSE OF AND NEED FOR ACTION

The Common Council of the City of Superior, Wisconsin, does ordain as follows:

TRAFFIC CALMING GUIDE FOR TORONTO CITY OF TORONTO TRANSPORTATION SERVICES DIVISION

TOWN OF PORTLAND, CONNECTICUT COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

ORDINANCE NO. 10- AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNTY OF PLUMAS, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ADDING ARTICLE 10 TO CHAPTER 3 OF TITLE 4 OF THE PLUMAS COUNTY CODE

DECISION MEMO. Pursuant to 36 C.F.R (e), the following persons are exempted from this order:

University of Victoria Campus Cycling Plan Terms of Reference. 1.0 Project Description

Complete Streets. Designing Streets for Everyone. Sarnia

12 RECOMMENDATIONS Road Improvements. Short Term (generally the next five years)

Mount Snow Disc Golf Course and Mountain Bike Race Course Project

Living Streets Policy

VILLAGE OF NILES TRAFFIC CALMING POLICY

CITY OF ELKO BICYCLE AND PATHWAY PLAN

Borough of Danville, PA Traffic Calming Program Guidelines

Traffic Calming Policy

DATE: October 20, Planning Commission. Beth McKibben, Planner Community Development Department FILE NO.: CSP

CLEAR CREEK WATERSHED

Trail Fundamentals and Trail Management Objectives

Corpus Christi Metropolitan Transportation Plan Fiscal Year Introduction:

The 2009 Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) (Brief) Highlights for Arizona Practitioners. Arizona Department of Transportation

RESOLUTION NO ?? A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF NEPTUNE BEACH ADOPTING A COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

Overview. Illinois Bike Summit IDOT Complete Streets Policy Presentation. What is a Complete Street? And why build them? And why build them?

Solana Beach Comprehensive Active Transportation Strategy (CATS)

Preventive Measures and Existing Regulations for Chronic Wasting Disease in the U.S.

Parks and Recreation Division. Public Boat Ramps

CEPA Initiative: Response Time Guideline 2015 EMERGENCY SECURITY MANAGEMENT WORK GROUP

IMPLEMENTING REGULATIONS OF THE WILDLIFE CONSERVATION LAW. Authorized by the Republic of China Wildlife Conservation Law, amended October 29, 1994.

May 12, Dear Superintendent Kimball:

o n - m o t o r i z e d transportation is an overlooked element that can greatly enhance the overall quality of life for the community s residents.

Introduction.

Lamprey Rivers Advisory Committee (LRAC) Annual Report FY 2017 (Oct. 1, 2016 Sept. 30, 2017)

HOOPA DESIGN FAIR 4. IMPLEMENTATION PHASES & FUNDING

QLDC Council 29 October Report for Agenda Item: 3

CHAPTER 2G. PREFERENTIAL AND MANAGED LANE SIGNS

CITY OF WEST KELOWNA COUNCIL POLICY MANUAL

The North American Waterfowl Management Plan: Incorporating the New Goal

Township of Plainsboro Ordinance No County of Middlesex AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A DEER MANAGEMENT PLAN ON CERTAIN PUBLIC PROPERTY

The Role of MPOs in Advancing Safe Routes to School through the Transportation Alternatives Program

CHAPTER 77: RECREATIONAL VEHICLES. Section. Bicycles

NOTICE OF 30-DAY OPPORTUNITY TO COMMENT March 20, 2013

INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM

February 12, Manti-La Sal National Attn: Megan Eno 599 West Price River Drive Price, UT Submitted via

6.4 RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS

REGIONAL BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN DESIGN GUIDELINES

REVISED POLICY OTHER POWER-DRIVEN MOBILITY DEVICES City of Boise Department of Parks & Recreation

City of Charlottesville Traffic Calming Handbook

IC Chapter 3. Traffic Control Signals

A Residential Guide to Neighborhood Speed Enforcement

THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF STRATHROY-CARADOC BY-LAW NUMBER 24-09

CITY MANUALS AND STANDARDS REVIEW

CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF STRATHROY-CARADOC BYLAW NO

Bicycling Routes on Provincial Roads Policy

FERGUSON TOWNSHIP APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL EVENTS PERMIT

EUCLID AVENUE PARKING STUDY CITY OF SYRACUSE, ONONDAGA COUNTY, NEW YORK

BIKE PLAN CONTENTS GATEWAY

2018 WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT PLAN

Classifying Roadways Policy. Approval Date: October 30 th, 2007 By-Law No.: Page No.: 1 of 5 Amendment: Preamble

Gary Eddy ATV/Snowmobile Administrator WI DNR

The Code of Federal Regulation (CFR) at 40 CFR directs the agency to discuss the direct and indirect impacts of all alternatives.

TESTIMONY OF THOMAS O KEEFE, PhD PACIFIC NORTHWEST STEWARDSHIP DIRECTOR ON BEHALF OF AMERICAN WHITEWATER

Residential Traffic Calming Program Guide. Town of Ashland, Virginia

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY CRITERIA

Hunting, Fishing, Recreational Shooting, and Wildlife Conservation Opportunities and Coordination with States, Tribes, and Territories

PROPOSED REGULATION OF THE BOARD OF WILDLIFE COMMISSIONERS. LCB File No. R112-14

Gravel Bike Guide Haywood County

City Snapshot September 27, 2018

Notice of Proposed Action Mountain Bike Route Designation Shoshone National Forest

PUBLIC NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULE NUMBER W 3812(I)

Medicine Bow Routt National Forest and Thunder Basin National Grassland; Routt. County; Colorado; Steamboat Ski Resort, Steamboat EIS

PUBLIC HEARING. for State Road (S.R.) 5/U.S. 1 Roundabout at Old Dixie Highway Flagler County, Florida. Financial Project ID No.

BIA INDIAN HIGHWAY SAFETY PROGRAM FY2016 TRAFFIC RECORDS GRANT. SECTION A: General Information. This section must be completed for all applicants.

Transcription:

Forest Service Travel Management Rule Status and Directives NOHVCC/NAOPM Conference Houston, TX March 26, 2009

What is the Travel Management Rule? Requires designation of roads, trails, and areas open to motor vehicle use by vehicle class and, if appropriate, by time of year. Provides a consistent, national framework for local decisions. Requires public involvement and coordination with state and local government agencies, and tribal governments. Prohibits motor vehicle use off the designated system, or inconsistent with the designations, with the publication of the motor vehicle use map.

Dispersed Camping, Big Game Retrieval Allows for the limited use of motor vehicles within a specified distance of certain forest roads and trails, solely for dispersed camping or big game retrieval (36 CFR 212.51(b)). To be used sparingly.

What is the Timeline? Schedule to complete MVUMs by 12/31/09 set by Chief Bosworth Work began in December of 2005 Cumulative number of National Forests and Grasslands completing designations/mvum by fiscal year (as of Jan 2009): FY07: 36 FY08: 63 FY09: 139 (projected) FY10 (1 st quarter): 179 (projected)

What Work is Required for Designation? It depends, in 2005: 77% of NFS lands were open to crosscountry travel or existing routes. 23% of NFS lands limited motor vehicle use to system routes (and areas).

Public Participation Interest and controversy is high one public meeting in CA was attended by 450 people Some meetings are very contentious Some publics are concerned about losing motorized opportunities, others are concerned that too many routes and areas will be designated A high level of expertise is needed to successfully organize and implement quality public participation

What s all the talk about the MVUM? (Recent MVUM Changes/Purpose) Additional symbols to help orient the visitor (campgrounds, picnic areas, peaks, FS offices) Ability to show township, range, and section lines NFS lands now shaded gray instead of white Additional symbols to differentiate between interstate highways, state and US highways, and other public roads New symbol for special designations Added method for displaying short roads

MVUM Changes, cont d May use campground symbol in place of campground roads Added symbol for political boundaries Improved instructions, added advice on how to produce a high quality map, added training Dispersed camping symbol can be shown on one side of the road Travel Management Rule changed to allow displaying dispersed camping and big game retrieval along roads not under FS jurisdiction May hand stamp effective date

Where Do We Go From Here? Implementation Guide being developed: Information and Education Managing Designated Routes and Areas Sign Guide Volunteers and Partners Law Enforcement Monitoring

ENTERING MOTOR VEHICLE RESTRICTION AREA Sign Guide Examples STAY ON ROUTES DESIGNATED ON MOTOR VEHICLE USE MAP AREA BOUNDARY ENTERING NO MOTOR xxxx VEHICLE USE ALLOWED YEARLONG MOTOR VEHICLE BEYOND THIS USE POINT AREA MOTOR VEHICLES ALLOWED YEARLONG For more information, refer to the Helena Ranger District Motor Vehicle Use Map or call 406-329-3312

Highlights of New Travel Management Policy (Forest Service Directives) Purpose: Provide more specific guidance to implement the TMR Identify the process for route and area designations, travel analysis, mixed use analysis OHV management guidance To provide consistent direction nationally Draft issued March 2007 33 comment letters received Final effective January 2009

FS Folks Might Want to Know: Policy can be found at: FSM 2350 Trail management FSM 7700 and 7710 Travel Management and Travel Planning FSH 7709.55 Travel Planning Handbook Chapter 10 Travel Planning for Designations Chapter 20 Travel Analysis Chapter 30 Engineering Analysis

Definitions Replaces user-created routes with unauthorized routes. Added definitions for motorcycle, over-snow vehicle, route, and utility terrain vehicle. Licensing, certification, or registration under a state recreation fee or green sticker program does not make an OHV highway-legal.

Definitions, Cont d Wheeled vehicles are not over-snow vehicles. Routes allowing wheeled vehicles over-snow must be designated and shown on a MVUM.

Definitions, Cont d Wheeled vehicles modified with tracks to run on snow are over-snow vehicles.

Resource Protection Considerations Management objectives are required for trails, roads, and areas. Use applicable criteria in rule for identifying effects to monitor (effects on natural resources, conflicts, public safety, etc). Monitor on a regular basis.

Resource Protection Considerations, Cont d Designate areas on NFS lands only when they have natural resource characteristics that are suitable for motor vehicle use or are so altered.

Definitions Relationship Between Roads and Motorized Trails Road is a route >50 unless id d as a trail. Trail is a route < or = 50 or > 50 if id d as a trail. Roads and motorized trails provide different recreation opportunities and may serve different purposes. Driving on trails may present different challenges and require different skills

Relationship Between Roads and Motorized Trails, Cont d Trails are generally characterized by narrower treads and clearing limits, slower speeds, narrower turning radii, and a more intimate experience with the surrounding landscape. roads (often provide a recreation experience) are usually intended to provide access for multiple purposes and may connect neighboring communities.

Road or Trail?

Converting Roads to Trails When considering converting unneeded roads to trails or identifying coincidental routes, consider: Whether the route would provide a recreation experience consistent with trail management objectives; Environmental effects of the continued existence of the route; Need for mitigation, removal, repair, or alteration of structures along the route; and Long-term trail maintenance and available funding. Local engineering and recreation staffs should coordinate.

So Who Cares? Different appropriation for maintenance Different management objectives Identifying a route as a trail when it appears to be a road may cause concern

Where Should FS Resources Go? Extreme paraphrasing: Take care of the roads and trails on our system. Decommission the roads we don t need. Consider decommissioning duplicative trails. Don t take care of what we don t have. Think very carefully before deciding to build new roads and trails Consider maintenance costs Consider available resources Do it for a good reason (roads) Avoid adding routes to the system if we don t have a way to maintain them.

Motor Vehicle Use Map Forests must follow the MVUM production guide What it must display (and not) MVUM must be available at appropriate Forest Service offices and on internet Hard copy must be free Review and reissue annually (changed from update)

Travel Analysis Not required for those administrative units and ranger districts that have issued a proposed action as of January 8, 2009. Travel analysis for identification of the minimum road system is separate from travel analysis for designation of routes and areas.

Designation Details Designated Areas - Motor vehicle use in a designated area may not be restricted by type of activity. Concurrence from public road authority - Where motor vehicles are allowed for dispersed camping or big game retrieval along non-fs roads, written concurrence is required from the applicable road authority. Parking (not camping) - Units need to specify either that parking is allowed within one vehicle length, or within a specified distance of up to 30 feet, from the edge of the road surface.

Designation Details, Cont d Should consider additional criteria: Existing and future needs of motor vehicle users. Uses on adjacent federal, state, and private lands. Uses exempt from designations, including use by oversnow vehicles. Non-motorized uses. Unauthorized routes, as appropriate. Changes in motor vehicle technology.

Where do we go from here? Intend to make corrections, clarifications to directives, as needed Directives are available at: http://www.fs.fed.us/recreation/programs/ohv/ Questions?