AMEC Earth and Environmental. Bovaird Drive Environmental Assessment. Traffic Study Final Report. August Excellence in Transportation Planning

AMEC Earth and Environmental Bovaird Drive Environmental Assessment Traffic Study Final Report August Excellence in Transportation Planning

AMEC Earth and Environmental Bovaird Drive Class EA Traffic Study Final Report Table of Contents. Introduction. Study Area Context. Document Review 5. Inventory 6. Existing Conditions 7. Road Network 7.. Transit.. Pedestrians and Cyclists. Traffic Volumes.. Intersection Level of Service.. Queuing Analysis 5.. Region of Peel Queuing Methodology 7..4 Collisions in the Study Area 9 4. Future Conditions 4. North-South Transportation Corridor 4. Long Range Transportation Plan 4. Region of Peel Road Capital Program 4.4 GTA West Corridor 4.5 Future Truck Traffic 4.6 Future Transit 4.7 Road Network Alternatives 7 4.8 Horizon Year 8 4.8. Planned Road Improvements, Brampton TTMP 8 ENTRA Consultants 8// Page i

4.8. Projected Traffic Volumes 4.8. Do Nothing Alternative 4.8.4 Intersection Level of Service with Planned Improvements 4.8.5 SimTraffic Queuing Analysis 5 4.8.6 Region of Peel Queuing Methodology 7 4.8.7 Roundabout Evaluation 8 4.9 Horizon Year 4 4.9. Planned Road Improvements, Brampton TTMP 4 4.9. Projected Traffic Volumes 4 4.9. Intersection Level of Service 4 4.9.4 SimTraffic Queuing Analysis 5 4.9.5 Region of Peel Queuing Methodology 54 4.9.6 Roundabout Evaluation 56 4. Summary 6 5. Recommendations 6 6. Summary 67 6. Existing Conditions 67 6. Future Roadway and Intersection Improvements 67 6. Conditions 68 6.4 Conditions 68 Appendices Appendix A Existing Traffic Data Appendix B Synchro Intersection Capacity Analysis Appendix C Level of Service Definitions Appendix D Region of Peel Queuing Methodology Appendix E HP BATS EMME Model Appendix F RODEL Capacity Output Page ii 8// ENTRA Consultants

AMEC Earth and Environmental Bovaird Drive Class EA Traffic Study Final Report List of Exhibits Exhibit Study Area Exhibit Existing Roadway Characteristics 8 Exhibit Existing Storage and Taper Lengths 9 Exhibit 4 Existing Transit on Bovaird Drive Exhibit 5 Existing Traffic Volumes, Roadway Peak Hours Exhibit 6 Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis, Existing Conditions, Roadway Peak Hours Exhibit 7 Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis, Existing Conditions, Roadway Peak Hours 4 Exhibit 8 Intersection Queuing Analysis, SimTraffic, Existing Conditions, Roadway Peak Hours 6 Exhibit 9 Intersection Queuing Analysis, Region Methodology, Existing Conditions, Roadway Peak Hours 8 Exhibit Approximate NSTC Location Halton-Peel Freeway Option 4 Exhibit Brampton Ultimate Transit Network 5 Exhibit GO Transit Service Plan 6 Exhibit Lane Configuration 9 Exhibit 4 Projected Traffic Volumes, AM and PM Peak Hours Exhibit 5 Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis, Conditions, AM and PM Peak Hours, Do Nothing Alternative Exhibit 6 Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis, Conditions, AM and PM Peak Hours ENTRA Consultants 8// Page iii

Exhibit 7 Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis, Conditions, AM and PM Peak Hours 5 Exhibit 8 Intersection Queuing Analysis, SimTraffic, Conditions, AM and PM Peak Hours 6 Exhibit 9 Intersection Queuing Analysis, Region Methodology, Conditions, AM and PM Peak Hours 7 Exhibit Roundabout Level of Service, Conditions, PM Peak Hour 9 Exhibit Lane Configuration 44 Exhibit Projected Traffic Volumes, AM Peak Hour 45 Exhibit Projected Traffic Volumes, PM Peak Hour 46 Exhibit 4 Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis, Conditions, AM Peak Hour 47 Exhibit 5 Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis, Conditions, PM Peak Hour 48 Exhibit 6 Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis, Conditions, AM Peak Hour 5 Exhibit 7 Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis, Conditions, PM Peak Hour 5 Exhibit 8 Intersection Queuing Analysis, SimTraffic, Conditions, AM Peak Hour 5 Exhibit 9 Intersection Queuing Analysis, SimTraffic, Conditions, PM Peak Hour 5 Exhibit Intersection Queuing Analysis, Region Methodology, Conditions, AM Peak Hour 55 Exhibit Intersection Queuing Analysis, Region Methodology, Conditions, PM Peak Hour 56 Exhibit Roundabout Level of Service, Conditions, PM Peak Hour 58 Exhibit Recommended Storage and Taper Lengths 65 Page iv 8// ENTRA Consultants

AMEC Earth and Environmental Bovaird Drive Class EA Traffic Study Final Report. Introduction ENTRA Consultants (now GENIVAR) was retained by AMEC Earth and Environmental to complete a traffic assessment for the Bovaird Drive Class Environmental Assessment for the Region of Peel. The purpose of this study is to review current and future level of service on Bovaird Drive and crossing intersections from Worthington Avenue/Lake Louise Drive to the Halton Region boundary just past Caseley Street for the existing AM, midday and PM peak periods, and for the AM and PM peak periods for the and horizon years. The existing roadways connecting with Bovaird Drive in the study area are as follows: Bovaird Drive at Worthington Avenue/Lake Louise Drive Bovaird Drive at Ashby Field Road Bovaird Drive at Mississauga Road Bovaird Drive at Heritage Road Bovaird Drive at Caseley Street This assessment identifies potential current and future traffic deficiencies on the roadway through a comprehensive and environmentally sound planning process and recommends road improvements. This report includes: A description of Bovaird Drive and the existing crossing roadways within the study area. A traffic capacity assessment of existing roadway and intersection operations for AM, midday and PM peak periods. A description of the planned future road network for Bovaird Drive for the and horizon years. A traffic capacity assessment for and future roadway and intersection operations for the AM and PM peak periods. The horizon includes an assessment with and without the North-South Transportation Corridor (NSTC). ENTRA Consultants 8// Page

A roundabout capacity assessment for and future intersection operations for the PM peak period. Recommendations on lane configurations, tapers and storage lengths for the intersections within the study area for the future conditions. The study area and crossing intersections can be found in Exhibit.. Study Area Context Brampton is continually growing at a rapid rate and has large areas of soon to be developed land in the west. According to the Brampton Transportation and Transit Master Plan, the city is expected to grow substantially over the next years with the population increasing by 68 percent or 7, residents between 6 and, 4, of which is in the Bram West area. Given the growth in population and employment in Brampton, traffic is increasing accordingly. The Halton Peel Boundary Area Transportation Study, a joint study between the Region of Peel, Halton Region, City of Brampton, Town of Caledon and Town of Halton Hills, identified the long-term ( and ) transportation network required to accommodate future traffic demands. The study covered an area from Trafalgar Road in the west to Chinguacousy Road in the east and from King Street in the north to just south of Highway 4 in the south. The study determined the following: Congestion is occurring on Bovaird Drive (formerly Highway 7) through Norval. A Georgetown-Norval By-pass will be required. There is a lack of east-west connections and continuity. East-west capacity improvements will be required between Bovaird Drive and Highway 4. There are north-south capacity deficiencies in Halton Hills and west Brampton. A North-South Transportation Corridor (NSTC) will be needed to support development in the study area. Suitable corridors for truck routes are required. More connections to freeways are needed. The Peel Long Range Transportation Plan, Peel Region Capital Road Improvements Program, and Brampton Transportation and Transit Master Plan all identify the need to improve Bovaird Drive. Page /6/ ENTRA Consultants

N Schematic Form revision: 9/4/ Legend Study Area Crossing Intersection Source: Google Maps Exhibit Study Area Bovaird Drive Class EA 9-55fig--8Figures

Page 4 /6/ ENTRA Consultants

. Document Review ENTRA staff completed an extensive document review for this study. Documents that were reviewed to complete this study included: Halton-Peel Boundary Area Transportation Study, September 4, 9 PowerPoint Presentation for Public Information Centre No. Region of Peel Long Range Transportation Plan, Final Report, September 5 and Draft Report Update, June City of Brampton Transportation and Transit Master Plan, Sustainable Update, 9 Draft Final Report, July 9 Region of Peel Official Plan, Office Consolidation, November 8 Halton-Peel Boundary Area Transportation Study (HP BATS) EMME model with PM peak hour link volumes with and without the NSTC Region of Peel EMME model with and PM peak hour link volumes with and without the NSTC Halton-Peel Boundary Area Transportation Study Transportation Master Plan, Technical Agencies Committee Meeting # PowerPoint presentation prepared by itrans Signal timings, ATR/Classification counts and AM, midday and PM turning movements counts for the following intersections: Bovaird Drive and Lake Louise Drive/Worthington Avenue Bovaird Drive and Ashby Field Road Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road Bovaird Drive and Heritage Road Bovaird Drive and Caseley Street Region of Peel Guidelines for Using Synchro Software v5., March Geometric Design Guide for Canadian Roads, 999 Edition, Transportation Association of Canada (TAC) Municipal Class Environmental Assessment Study, Mississauga Road Improvements from North of Bovaird Drive to Mayfield Road, November, 8, PowerPoint presentation for the Public Information Centre No. Three-year (5-7) collision summary on Bovaird Drive from Lake Louise Drive/Worthington Avenue to west of Heritage Road Peel Long Range Transportation Plan, 5 Mount Pleasant Secondary Plan Area Transportation Master Plan, July 9 ENTRA Consultants 8// Page 5

GTA West Corridor Study (ongoing) The Hamlet of Norval Secondary Plan Creditview Road Widening From Realigned Creditview Road to (Approximately,5m North of Bovaird Drive) Mayfield Road, Class Environmental Assessment Environmental Study Draft Report, ENTRA Consultants, April The roadway improvements described in this report for future conditions are consistent with the previous area studies reviewed, including the Municipal Class Environmental Assessment Study, Mississauga Road Improvements from North of Bovaird Drive to Mayfield Road, which outlines roadway improvements at the intersection of Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive.. Inventory An inventory of Bovaird Drive and all crossing roads from Worthington Avenue/Lake Louise Drive from the east to Caseley Street to the west was completed using information provided by the Region of Peel and field studies completed by ENTRA staff. ENTRA Consultants completed a field survey on November 5, 9. Information collected by ENTRA included documentation of storage and taper lengths, lane configuration, posted speed limits, roadway alignments, surrounding land uses and other details of the existing roadways. Page 6 /6/ ENTRA Consultants

. Existing Conditions. Road Network Crossing streets on Bovaird Drive within the study area include Worthington Avenue/Lake Louise Drive, Ashby Field Road, Mississauga Road, Heritage Road and Caseley Street. The characteristics of Bovaird Drive and the crossing intersections are described below and illustrated in Exhibit. Bovaird Drive Bovaird Drive (formerly Highway 7) is designated as an arterial road under the jurisdiction of the Region of Peel. Bovaird Drive at Worthington Avenue/Lake Louise Drive has a six-lane cross-section. Bovaird Drive, just west of Worthington Avenue/Lake Louise Drive, has a four-lane cross-section, which extends to the west side of Ashby Field Road where it becomes a two-lane cross-section. The two-lane cross-section of Bovaird Drive carries west through the remainder of the study area past Caseley Street. Currently, the speed limit on Bovaird Drive within the study area is 7km/h from Worthington Drive/Lake Louise Drive to west of Heritage Road. The speed limit then drops to 6km/h through Caseley Street. The CN Rail line does not cross any of the streets in the study area. Bovaird Drive crosses over the railway tracks. Worthington Avenue/Lake Louise Drive Worthington Avenue/Lake Louise Drive is a north-south roadway under the jurisdiction of the City of Brampton. The intersection of Worthington Avenue/Lake Louise Drive with Bovaird Drive is signalized. Commercial properties are present on both the northwest and northeast quadrants of the intersection. The south leg of the intersection leads into a residential subdivision. The speed limit on Worthington Avenue/Lake Louise Drive is 5km/h. Ashby Field Road Ashby Field Road is a local street leading into the Mount Pleasant GO Station to the north and a residential area to the south. The intersection of Ashby Field Road with Bovaird Drive is signalized with a double southbound left-turn lane. The speed limit on Ashby Field Road is 5km/h. Mississauga Road Mississauga Road is a major roadway under the jurisdiction of the Region of Peel. Mississauga Road, on the intersection approaches with Bovaird Drive, has a two-lane cross-section with left-turn lanes on the north-south approaches to the signalized intersection. The speed limit on Mississauga Road is 8km/h. ENTRA Consultants 8// Page 7

5 km/h 5 km/h N Form revision: 9/4/ Existing Traffic Signal Mississauga Road Lake Louise Drive Worthington Avenue 7 km/h Lane Configuration Right-turn Channelized Island Stop Sign Heritage Road 5 km/h Ashby Field Road Bovaird Drive Caseley Street James Potter Road NSTC * 8 km/h Creditview Road 5 km/h 6 km/h 6 km/h 7 km/h 7 km/h 7 km/h 7 km/h 5 km/h 6 km/h 8 km/h 5 km/h * The location of NSTC is assumed and subject to further study. If future studies conclude that the crossing location be west of Heritage Road, an addendum to this report will be completed. Exhibit Existing Roadway Characteristics Bovaird Drive Class EA Schematic 9-55fig-4-8Figures

Heritage Road Heritage Road has a two-lane cross-section on both the north and south approaches. The intersection of Heritage Road with Bovaird Drive is signalized. The speed limit on Heritage Road is 6km/h south of Bovaird Drive and 5km/h north of Bovaird Drive. Caseley Street Caseley Street is a local roadway under jurisdiction of the City of Brampton. The intersection of Caseley Street with Bovaird Drive is unsignalized with a stop sign on Caseley Street. The speed limit on Caseley Street is 5km/h. The existing storage and taper lengths for the left-turn and right-turn lanes at the intersections are shown in Exhibit. Exhibit Existing Storage and Taper Lengths Intersection Movement Existing Storage (m) Existing Taper (m) Bovaird Drive at Worthington Avenue/Lake Louise Drive Northbound Left Northbound Right 5 N/A - Channelized Southbound Left Southbound Right 5 N/A - Channelized Westbound Left Westbound Right 9 9 8 Eastbound Left Eastbound Right 76 N/A - Channelized Bovaird Drive at Ashby Field Road Northbound Left 75 7 Southbound Left Southbound Through/Right N/A Westbound Left Westbound Right 9 9 Eastbound Left Eastbound Right 48 9 6 Bovaird Drive at Mississauga Road Northbound Left 6 Southbound Left 8 7 Westbound Left 6 Eastbound Left Eastbound Right 45 88 Bovaird Drive at Heritage Road Westbound Left Westbound Right 55 5 4 Eastbound Left Eastbound Right 5 7 7 ENTRA Consultants 8// Page 9

.. Transit Currently, Brampton Transit routes 4, 4A, 5, 9, and 9 arrive at the Mount Pleasant GO station located at the intersection of Bovaird Drive and Ashby Field Road. Route 9 operates along Williams Parkway to James Potter Road to Ashby Field Road. Route 4 and 4A operate northbound on Chinguacousy Road. Route 4 then travels on Brisdale Drive and 4A travels along Worthington Avenue. Route operates on Sandalwood Parkway to Brisdale Drive and on to Bovaird Drive. Route 5 operates east-west along Bovaird Drive. The transit routes are shown in Exhibit 4. Exhibit 4 Existing Transit on Bovaird Drive Source: Brampton Transit Website System Map.. Pedestrians and Cyclists Currently, based on the traffic counts, there are few pedestrians in the Bovaird Drive corridor from Worthington Avenue/Lake Louise Drive to Caseley Street. Sidewalks are present at the following locations: all sides of the intersection at Bovaird Drive and Worthington Avenue/Lake Louise Drive southeast side of Bovaird Drive at Bovaird Drive and Ashby Field Road south side of Bovaird Drive at Caseley Street Page /6/ ENTRA Consultants

Pedestrians who are present with or without a sidewalk can cross Bovaird Drive at any one of the intersections within the study area. Cyclists are present but not prominent on Bovaird Drive. There are no dedicated bike lanes on Bovaird Drive.. Traffic Volumes Recent vehicle turning movement counts for the study area intersections were obtained from the Region of Peel. The turning movement counts are illustrated for AM, midday and PM peak hours in Exhibit 5. The dates of the counts are given below: Bovaird Drive at Worthington Avenue/Lake Louise Drive September 9, 9 Bovaird Drive at Ashby Field Road December, 9 Bovaird Drive at Mississauga Road December, 9 Bovaird Drive at Heritage Road December, 9 Yonge Street at Caseley Street December, 9 The summary of the existing traffic volumes on the boundary roads during the roadway AM and PM peak hours are shown in Exhibit 5 and detailed summaries are provided in Appendix A Existing Traffic Data... Intersection Level of Service Intersection capacity analyses were completed for each of the intersections on Bovaird Drive in the study area to determine the existing level of service (LOS) during the roadway AM, midday and PM peak hours. Intersection capacity analyses were completed using the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) methodology and Synchro 7 software and the Region of Peel Guidelines for Using Synchro Software v5., March. The results of the signalized and unsignalized existing capacity analyses can be found in Exhibit 6 and Exhibit 7, respectively. Details of the capacity analyses are presented in Appendix B Synchro Intersection Capacity Analysis. Definitions of the intersection level of service for signalized and unsignalized intersections can be found in Appendix C Level of Service Definitions. ENTRA Consultants 8// Page

Caseley Street 9 (5) [] 9 (7) [] Lake Louise Drive 7 (8) [7] () [9] () [4] Heritage Road (6) [65] 8 () [] 6 (6) [46] (4) [7] 474 (8) [6] 9 () [] Mississauga Road 9 () [9] 9 (7) [4] 85 (8) [] (7) [46] 5 () [57] 9 () [77] Ashby Field Road 67 (5) [8] 8 () [] 6 (8) [9] 6 (7) [5] 6 (5) [4] 97 (9) [57] Worthington Avenue (48) [] 6 (58) [9] 4 (48) [6] N 4 (66) [9] 79 (58) [9] 5 () [5] Schematic Form revision: 9/4/ xx (xx) [xx] AM (Midday) [PM] Existing Traffic Signal Stop Sign Bovaird Drive 476 (4) [97] 6 () [5] (9) [] 456 (49) [98] 58 (7) [] 7 () [48] 458 (8) [684] (48) [] 67 (9) [7] 7 (486) [855] 44 (6) [9] [59] (445) 94 [6] (6) 5 [5] (5) 4 [59] (49) 89 [8] (8) 5 [7] (8) 7 [45] (8) 6 [9] (74) [6] (8) [765] (469) 88 [66] (7) [46] (9) [55] (5) 79 [] (8) Exhibit 5 Existing Traffic Volumes, Roadway Peak Hours Bovaird Drive Class EA 9-55fig--8Figures

Exhibit 6 Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis, Existing Conditions, Roadway Peak Hours Intersection AM Peak Hour Delay (sec.) LOS V/C Midday Peak Hour Delay (sec.) LOS V/C PM Peak Hour Delay (sec.) LOS Movement V/C Bovaird Drive and Ashby Field Road.8 4 B. 9 A.4 6 B Eastbound Left.6 7 A. 6 A. 9 A Eastbound Through.9 A. 7 A.9 B Eastbound Right. 7 A. 6 A.4 9 A Westbound Left. B. 6 A.6 B Westbound Through.8 B.4 7 A.4 B Westbound Right. B. 6 A. 9 A Northbound Left.7 4 D.5 8 D.5 45 D Northbound Through/Right.9 9 D.4 6 D.4 4 D Southbound Left.6 44 D.7 4 D.4 4 D Southbound Through/Right.4 8 C. 7 C.4 6 C Bovaird Drive and Heritage Road.69 B. 4 A.7 6 B Eastbound Left.6 5 A. A. 7 A Eastbound Through.7 B. A.44 9 A Eastbound Right. 5 A. A. 5 A Westbound Left. 7 A. A.4 6 A Westbound Through.8 7 A. A.75 5 B Westbound Right. 5 A. A. 5 A Northbound Approach.7 C. 47 D.64 9 D Southbound Approach.5 6 D. 48 D.5 9 C Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road.94 5 D.4 C.95 48 D Eastbound Left.6 5 C.6 9 B.9 7 D Eastbound Through.95 6 E.48 5 C.75 44 D Eastbound Right.4 6 C.5 9 B.6 7 C Westbound Left. 9 F.5 6 B.7 C Westbound Through/Right.5 B.4 8 B.87 4 D Northbound Left.6 4 D. 4 C.45 4 C ENTRA Consultants 8// Page

Intersection AM Peak Hour Delay (sec.) LOS V/C Midday Peak Hour Delay (sec.) LOS V/C PM Peak Hour Delay (sec.) LOS Movement V/C Northbound Through/Right.9 C.6 5 C. 76 E Southbound Left.7 C.6 8 C. 49 D Southbound Through/Right.96 7 E.9 C.7 8 D Worthington Avenue and Bovaird Drive.4 C.6 B.7 4 B Eastbound Left.4 B. 9 A.75 5 C Eastbound Through/Right.4 9 A.4 9 A.8 6 A Westbound Left.6 8 A.8 8 A. 6 A Westbound Through. 9 A. 9 A. 7 A Westbound Right. 8 A.5 8 A.4 6 A Northbound Left.4 7 D.5 8 B. 7 D Northbound Through/Right.8 4 C.6 8 B.9 7 D Southbound Left.89 69 E.59 4 C.65 49 D Southbound Through/Right.9 7 D. 8 B.4 4 D Based on the capacity analyses for the existing signalized intersections, all intersections currently operate at satisfactory levels of service. The westbound left-turn movement at the intersection of Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road is over capacity with a 9 second delay in the AM peak hour. This is due in large part to the left-turning volume of vehicles opposing 6 vehicles per hour travelling in the eastbound through lane. Exhibit 7 Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis, Existing Conditions, Roadway Peak Hours Intersection AM Peak Hour Delay (sec.) Midday Peak Hour Delay (sec.) LOS PM Peak Hour Delay (sec.) Movement LOS Bovaird Drive and Caseley Street A A C Eastbound Through/Right A A A Westbound Left/Through A A A Northbound Left/Through 7 D 5 B 4 D LOS Page 4 /6/ ENTRA Consultants

Based on the capacity analysis, the existing unsignalized intersection of Bovaird Drive and Caseley Street has no capacity problems and operates at an acceptable level of service during all peak hours... Queuing Analysis SimTraffic was used to determine the queues at the signalized Bovaird Drive intersections. The results of the analysis are shown in Exhibit 8 and summarized below. The queue report indicates the following queues are over the storage capacity based on the 95th percentile:. Bovaird Drive and Heritage Road eastbound right-turn storage is m, queue is 4m in the midday peak period. Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road eastbound left-turn storage is m, queue is 6m in the AM peak period and 9m in the PM peak period westbound left-turn storage is 6m, queue is 4m in the AM peak period and m in the PM peak period northbound left-turn storage is 6m, queue is 47m in the PM peak period southbound left-turn storage is 8m, queue is 6m in the AM peak period. Bovaird Drive and Worthington Avenue/Lake Louise Drive southbound left-turn has a 5m storage, queue is 8m in the AM peak period southbound through/right-turn has a 9m storage (distance to nearest upstream intersection), queue is 7m in the AM peak period Although the queue lengths are over capacity for the northbound and southbound right-turn movements on Worthington Avenue/Lake Louise Drive, these movements are channelized and cannot be accessed if there is more than one vehicle queued in the through lanes. ENTRA Consultants 8// Page 5

Exhibit 8 Intersection Queuing Analysis, SimTraffic, Existing Conditions, Roadway Peak Hours Intersection Movement Bovaird Drive and Ashby Field Road Available Storage (m) 95th Percentile Queues Midday Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Eastbound Left 48 5 7 Eastbound Through 85 7 59 Eastbound Through 85 7 9 6 Eastbound Right 9 9 Westbound Left 4 5 Westbound Through 46 77 56 Westbound Through 46 49 7 87 Westbound Right 8 6 8 Northbound Left 75 5 5 Northbound Through/Right 9 7 4 5 Southbound Left 7 6 Southbound Left 6 4 Southbound Through/Right 5 8 Bovaird Drive and Caseley Street Eastbound Through/Right 7 Westbound Left/Through 9 7 6 Northbound Left/Right 5 Bovaird Drive and Heritage Road Eastbound Left 5 4 9 Eastbound Through 95 5 8 69 Eastbound Right 8 4 Westbound Left 55 8 5 Westbound Through 48 68 7 Westbound Right 5 7 5 Northbound Left/Through/Right 5 4 58 Southbound Left/Through/Right 47 6 Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road Eastbound Left 6 5 9 Eastbound Through 464 94 54 Eastbound Right 7 Westbound Left 6 4 4 Westbound Through/Right 697 6 7 4 Northbound Left 6 47 Northbound Through/Right 5+ 6 5 5 Southbound Left 8 6 8 4 Southbound Through/Right 5+ 96 4 65 Page 6 /6/ ENTRA Consultants

Intersection Available Storage (m) 95th Percentile Queues Midday Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Movement Bovaird Drive and Worthington Avenue Eastbound Left 5 9 67 Eastbound Through 9 4 76 Eastbound Through 9 4 Eastbound Through/Right 9 44 6 Westbound Left 9 9 Westbound Through 46 8 56 Westbound Through 5 45 64 Westbound Through 4 Westbound Right 9 Northbound Left 5 6 Northbound Through/Right 9 44 5 Southbound Left 5 8 44 56 Southbound Through/Right 9 7 9 85.. Region of Peel Queuing Methodology The left-turn storage required at the study area intersections are governed by standards set out by Peel Region and will take precedence over Synchro requirements. If the requirement obtained by the Region s standards is less than Synchro, then priority will be given to the largest storage requirement obtained by either method. Peel Region s standard practice is to utilize a seven-metre vehicle length in all storage length calculations and to employ the use of the TAC Guidelines to determine the taper lengths. The following formula and attached table is utilized: Formula: m = (Ve x C) / (n x 6) Where: Ve: equivalent hourly volume C: cycle length in seconds (assume cycle length) n: number of lanes used by the equivalent volume,6: number of seconds in one hour The m value represents the average number of cars or trucks per lane arriving at an intersection approach in one cycle. As such, LOS C column in the table shown in Appendix D Region of Peel Queuing Methodology is utilized to find the value in the X Vehicles column. The value found in the X Vehicles column is multiplied by 7m for cars,.4 factor for trucks and.74 for buses. The value obtained represents the storage length required. It is important to note that the Region s methodology is appropriate for left-turn movements only. ENTRA Consultants 8// Page 7

The results are summarized in Exhibit 9. The calculation table for the Region s methodology can be found in Appendix D Region of Peel Queuing Methodology. Overall, the intersection queuing using the Region s methodology is better than that produced by SimTraffic. The movements where the queue exceeds storage are as follows:. Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road westbound left-turn storage is 6m, queue is 94m in the AM peak period and 8m in the PM peak period northbound left-turn storage is 6m, queue is 7m in the PM peak period southbound left-turn storage is 8m, queue is 7m in the PM peak period. Bovaird Drive and Worthington Avenue/Lake Louise Drive southbound left-turn storage is 5m, queue is 84m in the AM peak period and 66m in the midday peak period Exhibit 9 Intersection Queuing Analysis, Region Methodology, Existing Conditions, Roadway Peak Hours Region Queues (m) Approach Existing Storage (m) AM Midday PM Bovaird Drive at Worthington Avenue/Lake Louise Drive Northbound Left 5 4 4 Southbound Left 5 84 66 49 Westbound Left 9 7 4 Eastbound Left 84 8 7 Bovaird Drive at Ashby Field Road Northbound Left 75 4 Southbound Left 4 8 49 Westbound Left 4 5 8 Eastbound Left 48 7 7 7 Bovaird Drive at Mississauga Road Northbound Left 6 8 7 Southbound Left 8 7 8 7 Westbound Left 6 94 5 8 Eastbound Left 7 7 7 Bovaird Drive at Heritage Road Westbound Left 55 4 7 7 Eastbound Left 5 7 7 Page 8 /6/ ENTRA Consultants

..4 Collisions in the Study Area A collision summary of Bovaird Drive within the study area was provided by the Region of Peel. The main details in the collision summary provided for the study area from 5 to 7 are that there were 8 collisions at the intersection of Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road and collisions at the intersection of Bovaird Drive and Heritage Road. Most the collisions were property damage only. It should be noted that the direction of the collisions or specific location was not included in the summary. The collision summary provided by the Region can be found in Appendix A Existing Traffic Data. ENTRA Consultants 8// Page 9

Page /6/ ENTRA Consultants

4. Future Conditions This section describes and assesses the future road network for the and horizons. An assessment of the Bovaird Drive corridor was completed with and without the North-South Transportation Corridor (NSTC) for the horizon. This section also assesses the existing intersections along Bovaird Drive for roundabouts. 4. North-South Transportation Corridor The need for a NSTC has been identified due to the significant growth expected in west Brampton and Halton in the Milton and Georgetown areas. The location for the NSTC is unknown at this time. In order to allow the Class EA to proceed, the location of the NSTC is assumed to cross Bovaird Drive east of Heritage Road. However, if future Environmental Assessments conclude that the crossing location be west of Heritage Road, an addendum to the Bovaird Drive Class EA will be undertaken. The Halton-Peel Boundary Study identified the need for the Corridor due to the northsouth capacity deficiencies in Halton Hills and west Brampton as well as east-west link deficiencies, the need for more suitable truck routes and the need for more connections to freeways (Highway 4, Highway 47). HP BATS also identified the Halton-Peel Freeway Option as the preferred NSTC. The corridor will connect to Highway 4/47 to the south and extend north past Bovaird Drive and Wanless Drive by the horizon year. The approximate location of the NSTC is shown in Exhibit. The Halton-Peel Boundary Area Transportation Study Report was adopted by the Councils of participating municipalities including the Region of Peel, the City of Brampton, the Town of Caledon, Halton Region and the Town of Halton Hills in April and May. 4. Long Range Transportation Plan The Peel Region Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) was initiated in late as part of the Regional Official Plan Strategic Update (ROPSU). This study identified and addressed transportation challenges anticipated by the Region over the next to years, and developed appropriate policies, strategies and a road improvement plan to address these challenges. In, the Region of Peel initiated an update to the Long Range Transportation Plan 5 and completed a Draft Report, dated June. The LRTP covers the first two phases of the EA process for the identified roadway improvements. The LRTP identifies the need to widen Bovaird Drive to six lanes by. ENTRA Consultants 8// Page

4. Region of Peel Road Capital Program The Region of Peel Road Capital Program ( to ) identifies that by 6 Bovaird Drive should be widened from two to four lanes from Winston Churchill Boulevard to Mississauga Road and from four to six lanes from Mississauga Road to Worthington Avenue, and that by Bovaird Drive should be widened from four to six lanes from Winston Churchill Boulevard to Mississauga Road. 4.4 GTA West Corridor The Ontario Ministry of Transportation (MTO) has commenced the formal Environmental Assessment (EA) process to examine long-term transportation problems and opportunities to the year and consider alternative solutions to provide better linkages between Urban Growth Centres in the GTA West Corridor Preliminary Study Area, including Downtown Guelph, Downtown Milton, Brampton City Centre and Vaughan Corporate Centre, as identified in the Growth Plan. The GTA West Study is at the stage where a Draft Transportation Development Strategy Report was released. The report includes a Preliminary Route Planning Study Area, which is a geographic area within which a reasonable range of route alternatives can be generated and will be applied in Stage of the EA process. While there may not be firm commitments for the location of the GTA West Corridor at this time, the need for this Corridor has been established and the facility is planned to be in place by. 4.5 Future Truck Traffic Additional roadways to by-pass Norval from Bovaird Drive, such as the Georgetown- Norval By-pass, would provide an alternative to commuter truck traffic passing through the communities in Georgetown and Norval. As a result of future truck traffic travelling to and from the NSTC, aggregate sites and future development of commercial areas, truck traffic is expected to increase from percent to 5 percent by. In addition, Bovaird Drive is one of the few east-west arterial corridors, and the planned widening of Bovaird Drive would support the projected increase in truck movements. The widening of Bovaird Drive will help to accommodate truck traffic. 4.6 Future Transit According to the 9 Brampton Transportation and Transit Master Plan, in conjunction with development, Brampton Transit is expected to expand substantially and includes: Mississauga Road Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Bovaird Drive BRT to the Mount Pleasant GO station and Mississauga Road additional north-south and east-west transit corridors The ultimate () Brampton Transit network can be found in Exhibit. Page /6/ ENTRA Consultants

Detailed intersection drawings should include transit connections on Bovaird Drive at the Mississauga Road intersection. GO Transit is expected to expand as well. The GO Transit Service Plan can be found in Exhibit. ENTRA Consultants 8// Page

Exhibit Approximate NSTC Location Halton-Peel Freeway Option Source: AMEC, Environment and Infrastructure Group, August, Page 4 /6/ ENTRA Consultants

Form revision: 9/4/ Source: Brampton Transportation and Transit Master Plan Exhibit Brampton Ultimate Transit Network Bovaird Drive Class EA Schematic 9-55fig--8Figures

Form revision: 9/4/ Source: Brampton Transportation and Transit Master Plan Exhibit GO Transit Service Plan Bovaird Drive Class EA Schematic 9-55fig--8Figures

4.7 Road Network Alternatives Future alternative networks were developed to incorporate the long-term widening plans for Bovaird Drive and other committed improvements by the City of Brampton and Region of Peel. The future alternative roadway networks contained in this report are the following:. Do Nothing Roadway Network Alternative: Maintain Bovaird Drive in its present configuration west of Mississauga Road. Proceed with currently approved improvements only, east of Mississauga Road.. Improve other Roads: Improve adjacent parallel arterial roadways to accommodate the projected future traffic demand for Bovaird Drive.. Transit Service Improvements: Improve existing public transit service within the City of Brampton, and connect to the major activity areas of the Greater Toronto Area (GTA), to encourage a shift in modal choice from automobile to public transit modes. 4. Travel Demand Management (TDM): TDM measures are aimed at shifting travel behaviour to reduce peak hour vehicular traffic demand. Such measures may include increasing the number of carpool parking facilities, creating high occupancy vehicle (HOV) lanes, introduction of flexible work hours by major employers and facilitating active modes of transportation such as walking and cycling. 5. Widen Bovaird Drive with Intersection Improvements: Addition of through traffic lanes (six lanes from Lake Louise Drive to the Halton-Peel Freeway and four lanes from the Halton Peel Freeway to the access to the Northwest Brampton Secondary Plan Area), including intersection improvements to increase traffic capacity of the corridor. 6. Combination: Combine alternatives to 5 as mentioned above to increase the overall effectiveness of individual alternatives and reduce environmental impacts. The alternatives were assessed in the First Public Consultation Centre and detailed documentation of the assessment is provided in the Class EA, Progress Report, June, by AMEC. Based on the evaluation of alternative solutions as per the EA process, the Combination Alternative ( to 5) was carried forward and further assessed in this study. Although this report discusses transportation impacts only, the evaluation criteria for alternatives was based on natural environment, social, cultural and economic environment, cost, and compatibility with plans and policies. Alternative for, the Do Nothing option, is evaluated in this report and is not considered feasible as a transportation solution. Alternative 6, which is the preliminary recommended solution, is analyzed with signalized intersections and with roundabouts for conditions. ENTRA Consultants 8// Page 7

4.8 Horizon Year 4.8. Planned Road Improvements, Brampton TTMP By the horizon year, development along Bovaird Drive is expected to increase substantially. Therefore, many road and network improvements will be necessary. Based on the HP BATS EMME model output provided by the Region, the Municipal Class Environmental Assessment Study for Mississauga Road, and the 9 Brampton Transportation and Transit Master Plan north of Bovaird Drive to Mayfield Road, the base road improvements required for the horizon year are as follows:. Bovaird Drive is expected to widen to a six-lane cross-section (three lanes in each direction) from Worthington Avenue to west of Mississauga Road.. Bovaird Drive is expected to widen to a four-lane cross-section (two lanes in each direction) from west of Mississauga Road to west of Heritage Road.. Mississauga Road is expected to widen to a four-lane cross section, however, depending on the traffic volumes, Mississauga Road may need a six-lane cross section in. 4. Heritage Road is expected to widen to a four-lane cross-section both north and south of Bovaird Drive. 5. Additional roadways to by-pass Norval from Bovaird Drive, such as the Georgetown- Norval By-pass, which would provide an alternative to commuter truck traffic passing through the communities in Georgetown and Norval and support development in Georgetown and Brampton. The Georgetown-Norval By-pass is currently being examined for routing options by the Region of Halton, City of Brampton, Ministry of Transportation and Region of Peel and may significantly reduce truck and passenger car traffic on Bovaird Drive (Highway 7) in Norval and Georgetown. The additional roadways to by-pass Norval are expected to be in place for the horizon year. 6. The future James Potter Road will connect with Bovaird Drive opposite the realigned Creditview Road. The Region has indicated that the south leg of this intersection is expected to be constructed by the end of, while the north leg is expected to be constructed by 6. The HP BATS model output can be found in Appendix E HP BATS EMME Model. The lane configuration for the preferred road network is shown in Exhibit. The HP BATS model was not provided by Peel Region. Therefore, using the HP BATS model, an annual reduction in traffic of percent was applied on Bovaird Drive from Worthington Avenue/Lake Louise Drive to Mississauga Road and an annual percent reduction was used from Mississauga Road to the Halton Boundary to derive traffic. Page 8 /6/ ENTRA Consultants

N Schematic Existing Traffic Signal Mississauga Road Lake Louise Drive Worthington Avenue Lane Configuration Right-turn Channelized Island Stop Sign Heritage Road Ashby Field Road Bovaird Drive Caseley Street James Potter Road NSTC * Creditview Road * The location of NSTC is assumed and subject to further study. If future studies conclude that the crossing location be west of Heritage Road, an addendum to this report will be completed. Exhibit Lane Configuration Bovaird Drive Class EA 9-55fig-4-8Figures Form revision: 9/4/

4.8. Projected Traffic Volumes The ongoing HP BATS was used as the source for the future travel demand. Population and employment forecasts used in this study are practical, current and appropriate, and travel demand forecasts have been prepared for the and planning horizons. Population and employment levels were obtained from the land use framework concept in the Mount Pleasant Secondary Plan Transportation Master Plan, as endorsed by the City of Brampton. HP BATS is at a point where the need for the Georgetown-Norval By-pass has been established, therefore, the traffic forecasts in the HP BATS model would reflect the Georgetown-Norval By-pass. The north-south transportation corridor is not likely to be built by, however, the traffic analysis is included. The projected traffic volumes were taken from the afternoon (PM) HP BATS EMME model provided by the Region of Peel, which provided link volumes along Bovaird Drive. Current distribution of traffic was used from the provided link volumes to get turning movement counts at each intersection. With the NSTC connection with Bovaird Drive, it is expected that some of the westbound left-turning vehicles at the Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road intersection that were headed towards Highway 4 and Highway 47 will instead now travel through the intersection to the Halton-Peel Freeway and, therefore, 4 percent of traffic in the westbound left-turn lane at the intersection was relocated to the westbound through movement at the intersection for this scenario. Furthermore, the HP BATS model was not provided, therefore, an annual reduction in traffic of percent was applied on Bovaird Drive from Worthington Avenue/Lake Louise Drive to Mississauga Road and an annual percent reduction was used from Mississauga Road to the Halton Boundary to derive traffic. While HP BATS provided traffic projections along Bovaird Drive, Mississauga Road and Heritage Road, the other crossing streets did not have projected traffic. Therefore, due to the current level of development already occurring on Worthington/Lake Louise Drive and the GO station, a percent annual growth was applied to these roadways. No growth was applied to Caseley Street. The Region has indicated that the NSTC is not expected to be in place for the horizon year. The estimated AM and PM traffic volumes can be found in Exhibit 4. At the Region s request, the weekday AM traffic volumes are derived by reversing the weekday PM volumes, except for the Bovaird Drive and James Potter Road/Creditview Road intersection. As directed by the Region, peak hour traffic volumes for the Bovaird Drive and James Potter Road/Creditview Road intersection were obtained by interpolating between 6 and traffic volumes provided in the Mount Pleasant Block 5- Transportation Study and Collector Road EA Study, Final Report, January 4,. Page /6/ ENTRA Consultants

N Form revision: 9/4/ Existing Traffic Signal Bovaird Drive Caseley Street Heritage Road Mississauga Road Ashby Field Road Lake Louise Drive Worthington Avenue 68 () 45 () 5 (7) xx (xx) AM (PM) Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Without NSTC Stop Sign 89 (5) () 66 (6) 58 (95) 96 (8) James Potter Road 76 (5) 6 (48) 6 (66) NSTC * 7 () 7 (8) 86 (9) 9 (86) 65 () 57 (48) 55 (7) 8 (96) 8 (95) Creditview Road 79 (96) 74 (88) 9 (6) 4 (5) 5 (64) 6 (99) 99 (6) 84 (4) 9 (5) 44 (7) (45) 47 (77) 77 (47) 9 (6) (68) (89) 5 (4) 8 (96) 48 (6) 4 (68) () 4 () (76) 5 (58) 95 (4) 68 (7) (65) (8) 74 48 (57) 8 (7) 8 (74) (5) 57 (48) (9) 7 (4) 5 (84) 4 (59) 44 5 (9) 64 (5) 59 (44) 6 (9) 6 (88) 4 () (44) 7 (9) 6 (5) 7 * The location of NSTC is assumed and subject to further study. If future studies conclude that the crossing location be west of Heritage Road, an addendum to this report will be completed. Schematic Exhibit 4 Projected Traffic Volumes, AM and PM Peak Hours Bovaird Drive Class EA 9-55fig-4-8Figures

4.8. Do Nothing Alternative The do nothing alternative measures the traffic impacts on Bovaird Drive if the existing lane configurations are maintained (no roadway improvements) for traffic conditions. Intersection capacity analyses were completed for each of the intersections on Bovaird Drive in the study area for the do nothing alternative to determine the level of service (LOS) for the roadway AM and PM peak hours. Intersection capacity analyses were completed using the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) methodology, Synchro 7 software and the Region of Peel Guidelines for Using Synchro Software v5., March. The results of the signalized capacity analyses can be found in Exhibit 5. Details of the capacity analyses are presented in Appendix B Synchro Intersection Capacity Analysis. Definitions of the intersection LOS for signalized and unsignalized intersections can be found in Appendix C Level of Service Definitions. Exhibit 5 Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis, Conditions, AM and PM Peak Hours, Do Nothing Alternative Intersection AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Delay Delay Movement V/C (sec.) LOS V/C (sec.) LOS Ashby Field Road and Bovaird Drive.95 5 D.74 4 D Eastbound Left.5 7 C. B Westbound Left.77 6 E. 57 F Westbound Through.9 8 E.68 6 B Heritage Road and Bovaird Drive.6 5 F. 46 F Eastbound Left.89 47 F.88 84 F Eastbound Through.96 4 C.49 4 F Westbound Left.4 8 F. 9 B Westbound Through.7 45 F. 8 F Worthington Avenue and Bovaird Drive.65 C.74 6 C Eastbound Left.57 C.9 47 D Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive.7 49 F.8 49 F Eastbound Left. 689 F.4 F Eastbound Through.97 484 F.4 5 F Westbound Left. 557 F.99 5 F Westbound Through.5 78 F.67 4 F Northbound Left.9 F.95 48 F Northbound Through.7 66 F.6 F Southbound Left.65 4 F.4 7 F Southbound Through.5 89 F.9 458 F Page /6/ ENTRA Consultants

Results of the capacity analysis clearly show that if no improvements are made along Bovaird Drive, there will not be sufficient capacity to accommodate traffic demand and vehicles will experience long delays. If no improvements are made, the operational characteristics of the intersections would further worsen for conditions. Based on this analysis, the following input to the problem statement can be provided: As presently configured, Bovaird Drive will not have sufficient capacity to accommodate the anticipated traffic demand by and. 4.8.4 Intersection Level of Service with Planned Improvements Intersection capacity analyses were completed for each of the intersections on Bovaird Drive in the study area with the planned roadway improvements to determine the LOS for the roadway AM and PM peak hours. Intersection capacity analyses were completed using the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) methodology, Synchro 7 software and the Region of Peel Guidelines for Using Synchro Software v5., March. The results of the signalized and unsignalized capacity analyses can be found in Exhibit 6 and Exhibit 7. Details of the capacity analyses are presented in Appendix B Synchro Intersection Capacity Analysis. Definitions of the intersection LOS for signalized and unsignalized intersections can be found in Appendix C Level of Service Definitions. To complete the analysis for the horizon year, changes in signal timings were made including an additional eastbound left-turn phase at the Mississauga Road and Worthington Avenue/Lake Louise Drive intersections and other minor green split changes at all intersections. Exhibit 6 Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis, Conditions, AM and PM Peak Hours Intersection AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Delay Delay Movement V/C (sec.) LOS V/C (sec.) LOS Bovaird Drive and Ashby Field Road.6 C.67 C Eastbound Left.66 56 E.8 4 B Eastbound Through.58 C.74 C Eastbound Right. 4 B. B Westbound Left.45 4 B.78 7 D Westbound Through.65 7 B.48 B Westbound Right. B.4 8 A Northbound Left.66 5 D. 45 D Northbound Through/Right.46 4 D.4 4 D Southbound Left.8 5 D.6 5 D Southbound Through/Right.4 7 C. 9 C ENTRA Consultants 8// Page

Intersection AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Delay Delay Movement V/C (sec.) LOS V/C (sec.) LOS Bovaird Drive and Heritage Road.67 B.6 B Eastbound Left.7 C. 8 A Eastbound Through.5 7 A.68 A Eastbound Right.5 4 A. 5 A Westbound Left.7 9 A.8 8 A Westbound Through.65 9 A.5 8 A Westbound Right.5 4 A. 5 A Northbound Left.4 C.8 C Northbound Through/Right.9 C.4 C Southbound Left.9 9 C.6 C Southbound Through/Right.4 C.7 C Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road.99 5 D. 64 E Eastbound Left.55 C.7 4 C Eastbound Through. 79 E.68 6 D Eastbound Right.6 48 D.6 8 C Westbound Left. 5 F.6 F Westbound Through.5 6 C.57 7 C Westbound Right.5 C.6 C Northbound Left.98 87 F.5 84 F Northbound Through.6 C.8 7 C Northbound Right.7 8 C.69 6 D Southbound Left.8 88 F.85 8 F Southbound Through.6 4 D.9 57 E Southbound Right. 6 D. 7 D Bovaird Drive and Creditview Road.54 4 C.54 C Eastbound Left.59 B.68 8 B Eastbound Right. 7 B. B Westbound Left.9 9 B.6 6 B Westbound Right.5 C.6 8 B Northbound Left. 9 B.9 C Northbound Right. 9 B.6 C Southbound Left.9 C.5 7 C Southbound Right. C.6 C Lake Louise Drive/Worthington Avenue and Bovaird Drive.6 C.8 4 C Eastbound Left. B.88 4 D Eastbound Through/Right.47 B. 7 A Westbound Left. 5 C.8 C Westbound Through.57 C.6 4 C Westbound Right. 5 C.8 9 B Page 4 /6/ ENTRA Consultants

Intersection AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Delay Delay Movement V/C (sec.) LOS V/C (sec.) LOS Northbound Left.49 8 D.4 7 D Northbound Through/Right.9 9 C. 8 D Southbound Left.7 4 D.7 5 D Southbound Through/Right.45 C.9 4 D Based on the capacity analysis for the signalized intersections, all intersections are expected to operate at satisfactory levels of service with the exception of Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road, where turning movements expected to operate over-capacity include westbound left turns and northbound left turns. This is likely due to more traffic using Mississauga Road and Bovaird Drive as a connection to Highway 4 and Highway 47 and travelling along Bovaird Drive westbound towards Halton Region. Exhibit 7 Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis, Conditions, AM and PM Peak Hours AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Intersection Delay Delay Movement (sec.) LOS (sec.) LOS Bovaird Drive and Caseley Street A A Eastbound Through/Right A A Westbound Left A A Northbound Left/Through B 4 B The intersection capacity analysis for the unsignalized intersection of Bovaird Drive and Caseley Street indicates that the intersection will operate at a good LOS in the horizon year. In fact, due to the Georgetown-Norval By-pass, the intersection actually performs better than in the current condition. 4.8.5 SimTraffic Queuing Analysis SimTraffic was used to determine the queues at the Bovaird Drive intersections. The results of the analysis are shown in Exhibit 8 along with the existing storage lengths and predicted storage lengths. It should be noted that these storage lengths are not recommendations. ENTRA Consultants 8// Page 5

Exhibit 8 Intersection Queuing Analysis, SimTraffic, Conditions, AM and PM Peak Hours Intersection Available 95th Percentile Queues Movement Storage AM Peak PM Peak (m) Hour Hour Bovaird Drive and Ashby Field Road Eastbound Left 48 9 Eastbound Right 9 8 9 Westbound Left 5 Westbound Right 9 Northbound Left 75 4 Northbound Through/Right 9 66 4 Southbound Left 5 4 Southbound Left 5 Southbound Through/Right 6 5 Bovaird Drive and Heritage Road Eastbound Left 5 6 Eastbound Right 9 Westbound Left 55 5 9 Westbound Right 5 6 Northbound Left 4 7 Northbound Through/Right 58 8 4 Southbound Left 8 7 Southbound Through/Right 4 8 Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road Eastbound Left 5 49 Eastbound Right 8 47 Westbound Left 6 47 89 Westbound Right 6 4 7 Northbound Left 8 Northbound Right 5 59 7 Southbound Left 8 7 86 Southbound Right 6 4 Bovaird Drive and Creditview Road Eastbound Left 8 49 64 Eastbound Right 8 4 Westbound Left 85 7 Westbound Right 7 48 Northbound Left 4 5 8 Northbound Right 7 8 Southbound Left 5 Southbound Right 94 4 Page 6 /6/ ENTRA Consultants

Intersection Available 95th Percentile Queues Movement Storage AM Peak PM Peak (m) Hour Hour Bovaird Drive and Worthington Avenue Eastbound Left 48 8 Westbound Left 9 8 Westbound Right 9 44 Northbound Left 5 5 Southbound Left 5 84 64 Southbound Though/Right 9 55 6 From the SimTraffic queuing analysis, the following movements are expected to be problematic:. Bovaird Drive at Ashby Field Road westbound right-turn queues. Bovaird Drive at Mississauga Road eastbound, westbound, southbound and northbound left-turn queues and eastbound right-turn queues. Bovaird Drive at Worthington Avenue/Lake Louise Drive southbound left-turn and southbound right-turn queues As stated for existing conditions, although the queue exceeds available storage for the southbound right-turn movement on Worthington Avenue/Lake Louise Drive, these movements are channelized and the storage is in the channelized lane. 4.8.6 Region of Peel Queuing Methodology The Region of Peel s queue methodology was also reviewed for the traffic. The results are shown in Exhibit 9. Exhibit 9 Intersection Queuing Analysis, Region Methodology, Conditions, AM and PM Peak Hours Intersection Movement Existing/ Predicted Storage (m) Region Queues (m) AM Peak PM Peak Hour Hour Bovaird Drive and Worthington Avenue Northbound Left 5 4 Southbound Left 5 7 49 Eastbound Left 49 9 Westbound Left 6 7 ENTRA Consultants 8// Page 7

Intersection Movement Bovaird Drive and Ashby Field Road Existing/ Predicted Storage (m) Region Queues (m) AM Peak PM Peak Hour Hour Northbound Left 75 49 4 Southbound Left 4 8 Eastbound Left 48 4 7 Westbound Left 8 49 Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road Northbound Left 8 94 46 Southbound Left 8 45 49 Eastbound Left 5 5 8 Westbound Left 6 95 6 Bovaird Drive and Heritage Road Northbound Left 7 4 Southbound Left 7 4 Eastbound Left 5 8 Westbound Left 55 7 Bovaird Drive and Creditview Road Northbound Left 4 7 Southbound Left Eastbound Left 8 5 56 Westbound Left 85 7 Similar to the SimTraffic queues, the Region s methodology finds that the following movements are expected to be problematic:. Bovaird Drive at Mississauga Road eastbound, westbound, southbound and northbound left-turn queues, and northbound and eastbound right-turn queues. Bovaird Drive at Worthington Avenue/Lake Louise Drive southbound left-turn and northbound, southbound and westbound right-turn queues 4.8.7 Roundabout Evaluation The intersections of Worthington Avenue/Lake Louise Drive, Ashby Field Road, Mississauga Road, Heritage Road and Caseley Street with Bovaird Drive were analyzed to see if roundabouts were feasible in the horizon year. The analysis investigated the feasibility of roundabouts based on the following criteria: intersection delay and level of service compatibility with adjacent land use performance Page 8 /6/ ENTRA Consultants

Intersection Operations Assessment The intersection operations analysis included determining the expected capacity and delay for each approach of the roundabouts using RODEL roundabout capacity software. A 5th percentile confidence level was used in the RODEL analysis to represent the most probable capacity of each roundabout approach. Similarly, average delay, as opposed to maximum delay, was used to be consistent with the Synchro analysis. The RODEL output can be found in Appendix F RODEL Capacity Output. Based on the intersection analysis, the roundabout option for the intersection of Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road fails with a level of service F, as shown in Exhibit. Exhibit Roundabout Level of Service, Conditions, PM Peak Hour Intersection Movement Delay (sec) V/C Bovaird Drive at Worthington Avenue/Lake Louise Drive Northbound 9. Southbound 9.48 Westbound.57 Eastbound.47 Bovaird Drive at Ashby Field Road Northbound 7. Southbound 4.6 Westbound.5 Eastbound 4.69 Bovaird Drive at Mississauga Road Northbound 7.7 Southbound 45.6 Westbound 5.7 Eastbound 4.64 Bovaird Drive at Heritage Road Northbound 5. Southbound 5.9 Westbound 8.74 Eastbound 9.78 Bovaird Drive at Caseley Street Northbound 4. Westbound 4.7 Eastbound 5.5 Overall LOS A A F A A ENTRA Consultants 8// Page 9

Geometric Requirements and Performance Evaluation The intersection operation analysis determined that in order to function with an acceptable level of service as described, the roundabouts would require the following geometry:. Bovaird Drive at Worthington Avenue/Lake Louise Drive three entering lanes on Bovaird Drive in both directions one entering lane on the south leg and two entering lanes on the north leg because of the left-turn volume, the eastbound approach should have a dedicated left-turn lane as one of the entering lanes a 65m Inscribed Circle Diameter (ICD) Based on the capacity analysis, a roundabout at this location is technically feasible, however, due the grade from the west leg, the surrounding commercial properties and the good functionality of a traffic signal with the current geometry, a roundabout is not recommended at this location.. Bovaird Drive at Ashby Field Road three entering lanes on Bovaird Drive in both directions two entering lanes on both the north and south legs of the intersection a 65m ICD Again, a roundabout at this location is technically feasible, however, the intersection is currently operating well under signal control. Implementation of a roundabout is not recommended in this location.. Bovaird Drive at Mississauga Road three entering lanes on all but the north leg (southbound) where two entering lanes are necessary because of the left-turn volume, one of the three lanes should be a dedicated leftturn lane on the north and west approaches a 7m ICD The functionality of a traffic signal with the NSTC and the proposed traffic signal geometry will serve the intersection well instead of a roundabout. Also, due to its proximity with the proposed NSTC, high speeds on Bovaird Drive and future surrounding development, a roundabout in this location is not recommended. 4. Bovaird Drive at Heritage Road two entering lanes on all approaches a 5m ICD A roundabout at this location is feasible based on the capacity analysis, however, a traffic signal can handle the level of traffic expected for the horizon year. Also, to Page 4 /6/ ENTRA Consultants

be consistent with other area controls along Bovaird Drive a roundabout is not recommended in this location. 5. Bovaird Drive at Caseley Street a single entering lane on all approaches a 4m ICD A roundabout at this location is feasible based on the capacity analysis, however, due to space limitations on the roadway and the level of traffic on Caseley Street, a roundabout in this location is not recommended or preferred. Because the results of the operations assessment for the PM peak hour indicate that the roundabout option is infeasible, the AM peak hour analysis is not provided. 4.9 Horizon Year 4.9. Planned Road Improvements, Brampton TTMP Similar to traffic volumes, by the horizon year, development along Bovaird Drive is expected to increase substantially. Therefore, many road and network improvements would be necessary. Based on the HP BATS EMME model output provided by the Region, the Municipal Class Environmental Assessment Study for Mississauga Road, and the 9 Brampton Transportation and Transit Master Plan north of Bovaird Drive to Mayfield Road, the base road improvements required for the horizon year is as follows:. Bovaird Drive is expected to be a six-lane cross-section (three lanes in each direction) from Worthington Avenue to west of Mississauga Road.. Bovaird Drive is expected to widen to a four-lane cross-section (two lanes in each direction) from west of Mississauga Road to west of Heritage Road.. Mississauga Road is expected to widen to a six-lane cross section. 4. Heritage Road is expected to widen to a four-lane cross-section both north and south of Bovaird Drive. 5. The Georgetown-Norval By-pass as traffic is expected to be in place for the horizon year. 6. The future James Potter Road connects with Bovaird Drive opposite the realigned Creditview Road (as previously noted in conditions). 7. Elbern Markell Drive is planned to be extended to Bovaird Drive between and, located equal distance from Mississauga Road and James Potter Road. However, projected volumes do not warrant analysis of signalized intersection capacity. ENTRA Consultants 8// Page 4

4.9. Projected Traffic Volumes As stated in Section 4.8., the projected traffic volumes were taken from the afternoon (PM) HP BATS EMME model provided by the Region of Peel, which provided link volumes along Bovaird Drive. Current distribution of traffic was used from the provided link volumes to get turning movement counts at each intersection. With the NSTC connection to Bovaird Drive, it is expected that some of the westbound left-turning vehicles at the Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road intersection that were headed towards Highway 4and Highway 47 will instead now travel through the intersection to the Halton-Peel Freeway and, therefore, 4 percent of traffic in the westbound left-turn lane at the intersection was relocated to the westbound through movement at the intersection for this scenario. As stated previously, while HP BATS provided traffic projections along Bovaird Drive, Mississauga Road and Heritage Road, the other crossing streets did not have projected traffic. Therefore, due to the current level of development already occurring on Worthington/Lake Louise Drive and the GO station, a percent annual growth was applied to these roadways. No growth was applied to Caseley Street. Also, traffic volumes for the future James Potter Road/Creditview Road realignment where it connects with Bovaird Drive were taken from the Creditview Road Realignment Class Environmental Assessment prepared by ENTRA Consultants. The traffic volumes from this study were slightly modified along Bovaird Drive to match the traffic volumes with the NSTC. Lane configurations for the preferred road network is shown in Exhibit. The traffic volumes with and without the NSTC can be found in Exhibit and Exhibit for the AM and PM peak hours, respectively. 4.9. Intersection Level of Service Intersection capacity analyses were completed for each of the intersections on Bovaird Drive in the study area to determine the LOS for the roadway AM and PM peak hours. Intersection capacity analyses were completed using the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) methodology and Synchro 7 software and the Region of Peel Guidelines for Using Synchro Software v5., March. To complete the analysis for the horizon year, changes in the lane configuration and signal timing were made from existing and conditions. Lane configuration changes included the addition of a double northbound left-turn lane at the intersection of Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road. Modifications to the signal timings for the horizon year include: addition of a protected phase for the northbound left-turn lane at the Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road intersection cycle length increase from to 4 seconds to coincide with the protected phase at the intersection of Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road green split modifications at all intersections Page 4 /6/ ENTRA Consultants

The results of the signalized and unsignalized existing capacity analysis can be found in Exhibit 4, Exhibit 5, Exhibit 6 and Exhibit 7, respectively. Details of the capacity analyses are presented in Appendix B Synchro Intersection Capacity Analysis. Definitions of the intersection level of service for signalized and unsignalized intersections can be found in Appendix C Level of Service Definitions. ENTRA Consultants 8// Page 4

N Schematic Existing Traffic Signal Mississauga Road Lake Louise Drive Worthington Avenue Lane Configuration Right-turn Channelized Island Stop Sign Heritage Road Ashby Field Road Bovaird Drive Caseley Street James Potter Road NSTC * Creditview Road * The location of NSTC is assumed and subject to further study. If future studies conclude that the crossing location be west of Heritage Road, an addendum to this report will be completed. Exhibit Lane Configuration Bovaird Drive Class EA 9-55fig-4-8Figures Form revision: 9/4/

(89) 89 N Form revision: 9/4/ Existing Traffic Signal Heritage Road Mississauga Road Ashby Field Road Lake Louise Drive Worthington Avenue 69 (75) 5 (5) 64 (58) xx (xx) With NSTC (Without NSTC) Stop Sign Bovaird Drive Caseley Street James Potter Road NSTC Creditview Road (477) () 5 (9) (99) (9) 9 (8) 4 (875) 7 (7) (85) 66 (89) 6 (5) 98 (7) 86 (4) 56 (697) 59 (45) 74 (977) 55 (69) 8 (6) 6 (6) 6 (68) () 8 (4) () 59 (457) 6 (6) 5 (7) * 6 (59) 95 (64) 7 (67) 95 (95) 45 (7) 4 (4) (7) 5 () 7 (4) 4 (8) 6 (9) () (5) (4) (457) 7 (8) 5 (8) 79 (5) 7 (456) 8 6 (59) 757 (9) 75 (9) (69) 45 (4) 4 (4) 77 (57) 57 (57) 44 (49) 49 55 (69) 7 (7) (75) 79 (86) 79 (66) 7 (6) (454) 6 (7) 7 * The location of NSTC is assumed and subject to further study. If future studies conclude that the crossing location be west of Heritage Road, an addendum to this report will be completed. Schematic Exhibit Projected Traffic Volumes, AM Peak Hour Bovaird Drive Class EA 9-55fig-4-8Figures

(457) 59 N Existing Traffic Signal Heritage Road Mississauga Road Ashby Field Road Lake Louise Drive Worthington Avenue 4 (4) 6 (6) 7 (7) xx (xx) With NSTC (Without NSTC) Stop Sign Bovaird Drive Caseley Street James Potter Road NSTC Creditview Road 5 (7) () (4) 4 (8) 9 (8) (9) 7 (457) 7 (4) 79 (8) 757 (9) 98 (7) 6 (5) 7 (5) 6 (59) 45 (69) 79 (66) 6 (59) 57 (57) 7 (7) () 6 (68) 44 (57) 55 (69) 89 (89) 5 (5) 95 (95) * 55 (69) 4 (4) 79 (86) 5 (7) 6 (454) 69 (75) (477) (5) 7 (7) (99) 5 (8) () () (9) 5 (875) 4 (9) 6 (85) (4) 86 (9) 75 56 (697) 66 (89) 8 (456) (45) 59 (64) 95 (6) 7 (6) 8 (4) 8 (75) () 6 (6) 49 (49) 7 (67) 74 (977) 77 (4) (7) 45 (58) 64 * The location of NSTC is assumed and subject to further study. If future studies conclude that the crossing location be west of Heritage Road, an addendum to this report will be completed. Exhibit Projected Traffic Volumes, PM Peak Hour Bovaird Drive Class EA Schematic 9-55fig-4-8Figures Form revision: 9/4/

Exhibit 4 Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis, Conditions, AM Peak Hour Intersection With NSTC Without NSTC Delay Delay Movement V/C (sec.) LOS V/C (sec.) LOS Bovaird Drive and Ashby Field Road.78 7 C.79 4 C Eastbound Left.85 F.84 95 F Eastbound Through.6 4 C.67 4 C Eastbound Right. 6 B. 5 B Westbound Left.49 7 B.5 8 B Westbound Through.85 5 C.7 9 B Westbound Right.4 B.4 B Northbound Left.75 55 E.69 5 D Northbound Through/Right.46 4 D.5 4 D Southbound Left.9 5 D. 5 D Southbound Through/Right.6 6 C.5 6 C Bovaird Drive and Creditview Road/ James Potter Road.88 45 D.7 64 E Eastbound Left.98 8 F.6 F Eastbound Through.55 5 C.74 C Eastbound Right.7 9 B.9 C Westbound Left.79 C.9 5 D Westbound Through.98 56 E.6 8 F Westbound Right.6 6 C.49 C Northbound Left.8 46 D.9 4 D Northbound Through.66 5 D. 84 F Northbound Right.5 46 D.5 7 D Southbound Left.59 4 D.95 88 F Southbound Through.75 46 D. 7 E Southbound Right.6 4 D.9 C Bovaird Drive and Heritage Road.4 8 A.87 C Eastbound Left. 4 A.6 C Eastbound Through. 5 A.6 9 A Eastbound Right. 4 A.6 4 A Westbound Left.4 5 A.6 7 C Westbound Through.4 6 A.94 6 C Westbound Right. 4 A.8 8 A Northbound Left. C.8 C Northbound Through/Right. C.7 C Southbound Left.6 C. C Southbound Through/Right.9 C.44 4 C ENTRA Consultants 8// Page 47

Intersection With NSTC Without NSTC Delay Delay Movement V/C (sec.) LOS V/C (sec.) LOS Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road.94 59 E.5 6 E Eastbound Left.64 4 D.66 6 D Eastbound Through.4 79 E.99 69 E Eastbound Right.6 7 D.74 5 D Westbound Left. 9 F.9 9 F Westbound Through.78 4 C.6 C Westbound Right. C. 4 C Northbound Left.4 F.95 F Northbound Through.5 4 D.98 7 E Northbound Right. 7 D.56 47 D Southbound Left.47 4 D.64 49 D Southbound Through.65 54 D.86 6 E Southbound Right. 48 D.9 47 D Bovaird Drive and Worthington.76 C.7 6 C Eastbound Left.9 6 B.5 B Eastbound Through/Right.5 6 B.5 B Westbound Left.4 C.6 9 C Westbound Through.88 46 D.74 5 C Westbound Right.4 C.4 6 C Northbound Left.4 C.74 68 E Northbound Through/Right.7 6 C. 7 C Southbound Left.8 56 E.79 45 D Southbound Through/Right.56 9 D.5 C Exhibit 5 Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis, Conditions, PM Peak Hour With NSTC Without NSTC Intersection Delay Delay Movement V/C (sec.) LOS V/C (sec.) LOS Bovaird Drive and Ashby Field Road.8 7 C.74 C Eastbound Left. 5 B. 5 B Eastbound Through.95 C.8 5 C Eastbound Right.6 4 B. 4 B Westbound Left.79 4 D.86 5 D Westbound Through.48 B.5 B Westbound Right.4 8 A.4 8 A Northbound Left.6 46 D.6 46 D Northbound Through/Right.5 4 D.5 4 D Page 48 /6/ ENTRA Consultants

With NSTC Without NSTC Intersection Delay Delay Movement V/C (sec.) LOS V/C (sec.) LOS Southbound Left.69 5 D.69 5 D Southbound Through/Right.4 C.5 C Bovaird Drive and Heritage Road.4 A.78 7 B Eastbound Left. 4 A.56 C Eastbound Through.44 6 A.86 6 B Eastbound Right. 4 A. 5 A Westbound Left.5 4 A.7 8 B Westbound Through. 5 A.64 B Westbound Right. 4 A. 5 A Northbound Left.9 C.45 C Northbound Through/Right.9 C.49 C Southbound Left. C.4 C Southbound Through/Right. C.47 C Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road.9 49 D.9 F Eastbound Left.7 4 D.5 6 C Eastbound Through.96 55 E.75 9 D Eastbound Right. C. 9 C Westbound Left.9 95 F.55 4 F Westbound Through.76 5 D.66 C Westbound Right. C.9 C Northbound Left.94 9 F.6 F Northbound Through.6 C.49 5 C Northbound Right.7 4 D. 88 F Southbound Left.64 7 E.4 85 F Southbound Through.74 57 E.9 94 F Southbound Right.6 45 D.7 49 D Bovaird Drive and Worthington Avenue.79 8 C.8 9 C Eastbound Left.89 9 D.9 5 D Eastbound Through/Right.4 9 A.4 8 A Westbound Left.5 4 D.4 C Westbound Through.88 8 D.75 C Westbound Right.8 4 C.9 C Northbound Left. 8 C.4 7 D Northbound Through/Right. 9 C. 7 D Southbound Left.67 4 D.74 55 D Southbound Through/Right. C.47 4 D Bovaird Drive and Creditview.9 54 D.6 65 E Eastbound Left.97 74 E.4 6 F ENTRA Consultants 8// Page 49

With NSTC Without NSTC Intersection Delay Delay Movement V/C (sec.) LOS V/C (sec.) LOS Eastbound Through.75 9 C.85 6 D Eastbound Right. 7 B. C Westbound Left.54 8 D.67 4 D Westbound Through.99 75 E.7 86 F Westbound Right. 9 D. C Northbound Left.8 5 D.5 4 D Northbound Through.98 84 F.99 66 E Northbound Right.5 55 D.64 4 D Southbound Left.99 98 F.6 7 F Southbound Through.4 7 D.45 4 C Southbound Right.7 7 D.66 C Based on the capacity analysis for the signalized intersections, the intersections of Worthington Avenue/Lake Louise Drive, Ashby Field Road, and Heritage Road are expected to operate at a satisfactory LO with and without the NSTC and the connection to Bovaird Drive. The intersection of Bovaird Drive with the future James Potter Road/Creditview Road is expected to operate at a satisfactory LOS with the NSTC, but over capacity without the NSTC. To improve the operation of the Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road intersection, a dual westbound left-turn lane was introduced. For the scenario with the NSTC and with the improvements, the intersection is expected to operate at an overall LOS below. in the PM peak hour. In the AM peak hour with the NSTC, the westbound left-turn, eastbound through and northbound left-turn are expected to operate above capacity. For the scenario without the NSTC, the intersection fails overall with the westbound leftturn, northbound left-turn, northbound right-turn southbound left-turn, and southbound through movements all over capacity in the PM peak hour. Exhibit 6 Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis, Conditions, AM Peak Hour Intersection Movement With NSTC Delay (sec.) LOS Without NSTC Delay (sec.) LOS Bovaird Drive and Caseley Street. A. A Westbound Left/Through A A Northbound Left/Through A 5 B Page 5 /6/ ENTRA Consultants

Exhibit 7 Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis, Conditions, PM Peak Hour Intersection Movement With NSTC Delay (sec.) LOS Without NSTC Delay (sec.) LOS Bovaird Drive and Caseley Street. A. A Westbound Left/Through A A Northbound Left/Through A A The intersection capacity analysis for the unsignalized intersection of Bovaird Drive and Caseley Street indicates that the intersection will operate at a good LOS in the horizon year. In fact, due to the Georgetown-Norval By-pass and the NSTC, the intersection actually performs better than current conditions. It should be noted that although not recommended due to potential safety concerns because of the speed on Mississauga Road and number of vehicles in the through lanes, the southbound right-turn lane traffic can be accommodated in the first southbound through lane, which would make it a through/right. 4.9.4 SimTraffic Queuing Analysis SimTraffic was used to determine the queues at the Bovaird Drive intersections. The results of the analysis are shown in Exhibit 8 and Exhibit 9. The existing storage along with predicted storage for the longer and new movements are also shown. It should be noted that these storage lengths are not recommendations. Exhibit 8 Intersection Queuing Analysis, SimTraffic, Conditions, AM Peak Hour Intersection Movement Available/ Predicted Storage (m) SimTraffic 95th Percentile Queues With Without NSTC NSTC Bovaird Drive and Ashby Field Road Eastbound Left 48 4 8 Eastbound Right 9 Westbound Left 8 69 Westbound Right 9 Northbound Left 75 77 44 Northbound Through/Right 9 7 7 Southbound Left 7 5 Southbound Left 7 4 Southbound Through/Right 9 5 ENTRA Consultants 8// Page 5

Intersection Movement Available/ Predicted Storage (m) SimTraffic 95th Percentile Queues With Without NSTC NSTC Bovaird Drive and Creditview Road Eastbound Left 8 75 7 Eastbound Right 8 4 4 Westbound Left 85 68 Westbound Right Northbound Left 4 6 4 Northbound Right 8 75 Southbound Left 8 48 65 Southbound Right 5 8 Bovaird Drive and Heritage Road Eastbound Left 5 Eastbound Right 4 Westbound Left 55 7 Westbound Right 6 4 Northbound Left Northbound Through/Right 58 7 4 Southbound Left 8 Southbound Through/Right 4 4 Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road Eastbound Left 5 64 Eastbound Right 6 76 Westbound Left 5 47 7 Westbound Left 5 5 77 Westbound Right 6 4 76 Northbound Left 8 87 Northbound Left 9 5 85 Northbound Right 5 55 Southbound Left 5 47 4 Southbound Right 6 5 Bovaird Drive and Worthington Avenue Eastbound Left 45 4 Westbound Left 9 9 Westbound Right Northbound Left 4 4 Southbound Left 8 9 77 Page 5 /6/ ENTRA Consultants

From the SimTraffic queuing analysis, the following movements are said to be problematic in the AM peak hour:. Bovaird Drive at Mississauga Road eastbound, westbound, southbound and northbound left-turn queues for both scenarios are high. Bovaird Drive at Ashby Field Road westbound right-turn lane in the scenario without the NSTC northbound left-turn lane in the scenario with the NSTC Exhibit 9 Intersection Queuing Analysis, SimTraffic, Conditions, PM Peak Hour Intersection Available/ Predicted SimTraffic 95th Percentile Queues Without Movement Storage (m) With NSTC NSTC Bovaird Drive and Ashby Field Road Eastbound Left 48 9 9 Eastbound Right 9 6 Westbound Left 6 5 Westbound Right 4 Northbound Left 75 Northbound Through/Right 9 7 4 Southbound Left 4 4 Southbound Left 48 4 Southbound Through/Right 8 4 Bovaird Drive and Heritage Road Eastbound Left 5 5 7 Eastbound Right 8 6 Westbound Left 55 7 4 Westbound Right 7 Northbound Left 4 8 Northbound Through/Right 5 9 4 Southbound Left 8 Southbound Through/Right 47 8 4 Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road Eastbound Left 5 46 46 Eastbound Right 56 6 Westbound Left 5 6 Westbound Right 5 65 78 Northbound Left 8 55 7 Northbound Left 9 6 75 Northbound Right 5 95 9 Southbound Left 5 4 Southbound Right 6 99 ENTRA Consultants 8// Page 5

Intersection Available/ Predicted SimTraffic 95th Percentile Queues Without NSTC Movement Storage (m) With NSTC Bovaird Drive and Worthington Avenue Eastbound Left Westbound Left 9 6 6 Westbound Right 9 56 48 Northbound Left 5 4 Southbound Left 5 7 79 Bovaird Drive and Creditview Road Eastbound Left 8 48 8 Eastbound Right 8 Westbound Left 85 4 4 Westbound Right 75 4 Northbound Left 4 8 56 Northbound Right 8 68 Southbound Left 8 84 75 Southbound Right 5 8 5 From the SimTraffic queuing analysis, the following movements are said to be problematic in the PM peak hour:. Bovaird Drive at Mississauga Road eastbound, westbound, southbound and northbound left-turn queues for both scenarios are high eastbound right-turn lane at the intersection has a long queue. Bovaird Drive at Ashby Field Road eastbound right-turn lane in the scenario with the NSTC southbound through/right-turn lane is past the storage Similar to existing conditions, although the queue is over capacity for the northbound and southbound right-turn movements on Worthington Avenue/Lake Louise Drive, these movements are channelized and the storage is in the channelized lane. 4.9.5 Region of Peel Queuing Methodology The Region of Peel s queuing methodology was also reviewed for the traffic. The results are shown in Exhibit and Exhibit. Similar to the SimTraffic queues, the Region s methodology finds the following movements problematic in the PM peak hour:. Bovaird Drive at Mississauga Road southbound, westbound, eastbound and northbound left-turn queues for both scenarios are high Page 54 /6/ ENTRA Consultants

. Bovaird Drive at Worthington Avenue/Lake Louise Drive southbound left-turn queue is slightly (6m) over the storage, however, this is measured to the commercial driveway and vehicles can queue longer if necessary Again, the Region s methodology has fewer movements that are problematic compared to the SimTraffic queues. Exhibit Intersection Queuing Analysis, Region Methodology, Conditions, AM Peak Hour Intersection Available/ Region Queues (m) Movement Predicted With Without Storage NSTC NSTC (m) (m) (m) Bovaird Drive and Worthington Avenue Northbound Left 5 Southbound Left 5 7 77 Eastbound Left 56 56 Westbound Left 9 7 7 Bovaird Drive and Ashby Field Road Northbound Left 75 56 49 Southbound Left x 4 4 Eastbound Left 48 4 4 Westbound Left 8 8 Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road Northbound Left x 9 7 66 Southbound Left 5 5 5 Eastbound Left 5 8 59 Westbound Left x 5 94 Bovaird Drive and Heritage Road Northbound Left 7 7 Southbound Left 7 Eastbound Left 55 7 8 Westbound Left 5 4 8 Bovaird Drive and Creditview Road Northbound Left 4 Southbound Left 8 49 56 Eastbound Left 8 7 6 Westbound Left 5 84 ENTRA Consultants 8// Page 55

Exhibit Intersection Queuing Analysis, Region Methodology, Conditions, PM Peak Hour Intersection Available/ Region Queues (m) Movement Predicted With Without Storage NSTC NSTC (m) (m) (m) Bovaird Drive and Worthington Avenue Northbound Left 5 Southbound Left 5 56 56 Eastbound Left 5 6 Westbound Left 9 Bovaird Drive and Ashby Field Road Northbound Left 75 4 4 Southbound Left x 5 5 Eastbound Left 48 7 7 Westbound Left 4 49 Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road Northbound Left x 9 7 87 Southbound Left 5 5 66 Eastbound Left 5 5 45 Westbound Left x 5 66 94 Bovaird Drive and Heritage Road Northbound Left 4 Southbound Left 7 Eastbound Left 55 4 Westbound Left 5 7 7 Bovaird Drive and Creditview Road Northbound Left 4 8 5 Southbound Left 8 7 Eastbound Left 8 84 57 Westbound Left 5 8 8 4.9.6 Roundabout Evaluation Similar to traffic, the intersections of Worthington Avenue/Lake Louise Drive, Ashby Field Road, Mississauga Road, Heritage Road and Caseley Street with Bovaird Drive were analyzed with and without the NSTC connection to see if roundabouts were feasible in the horizon year. The analysis investigated the feasibility of roundabouts based on the following criteria: intersection delay and level of service compatibility with adjacent land use performance Page 56 /6/ ENTRA Consultants

Intersection Operations Assessment The intersection operation analysis included determining the expected capacity and delay for each approach of the roundabouts using RODEL roundabout capacity software, similar to the traffic analysis. A summary of the RODEL analysis can be found in Exhibit. The RODEL output can be found in Appendix F RODEL Capacity Output. Based on the intersection analysis, roundabouts will operate at an acceptable delay and LOS at all intersections in the horizon year for the option with the NSTC connection. The roundabout scenario without the NSTC connection fails for the intersection of Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road with an LOS F. It should be noted that for comparison analysis, the same geometry was used for both scenarios. Geometric Requirements and Performance Evaluation The intersection operation analysis determined that in order to function with an acceptable LOS as described, the roundabouts would require the following geometry in the horizon year: Bovaird Drive at Worthington Avenue/Lake Louise Drive No modifications would be required from the roundabout geometry for this intersection. The evaluation and evaluation is identical, which is as follows: three entering lanes on Bovaird Drive in both directions one entering lane on the south leg and two entering lanes on the north leg because of the left-turn volume, the eastbound approach should have a dedicated left-turn lane as one of the entering lanes a 65m ICD A roundabout at this location is technically feasible, however, due the grade from the west leg, the surrounding commercial properties and the functionality of a traffic signal with the current geometry, a roundabout is not recommended at this location. Bovaird Drive at Ashby Field Road The geometry required for this roundabout is also identical to the roundabout. The evaluation is also similar, which is as follows: three entering lanes on Bovaird Drive in both directions two entering lanes on both the north and south legs of the intersection a 65m ICD A roundabout at this location is technically feasible, however, the intersection is currently operating well under signal control. Implementation of a roundabout is not recommended in this location. ENTRA Consultants 8// Page 57

Bovaird Drive at James Potter Road/Creditview Road The geometry required for this roundabout is as follows: three entering lanes on Bovaird Drive in the westbound direction and four entering lanes on Bovaird Drive in the eastbound direction two entering lanes for the northbound direction and three entering lanes in the southbound direction a 7m ICD A roundabout at this location is technically feasible, however, the intersection will operate well under signal control. Implementation of a roundabout is not recommended in this location. Exhibit Roundabout Level of Service, Conditions, PM Peak Hour Delay (sec) V/C Overall LOS without with without with NSTC NSTC NSTC NSTC with NSTC Bovaird Drive at Worthington Avenue/Lake Louise Drive Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound 6 4 4.8.5.64.58.5.57.6.5 Bovaird Drive at Ashby Field Road Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound 4 8 5 6.4.9.5.88 Bovaird Drive at James Potter Road/Creditview Road Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound 7 9 4 N/A Bovaird Drive at Mississauga Road Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound 4 8 5 77 5 9.84.76.64.85.86.6.84.84.8..56.77 A B without NSTC A A N/A C N/A.99.4.9.8 C F Page 58 /6/ ENTRA Consultants

Delay (sec) V/C Overall LOS without with without with NSTC NSTC NSTC NSTC with NSTC Bovaird Drive at Heritage Road Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound 5 8 77 Bovaird Drive at Caseley Street Northbound Westbound Eastbound 4 4 5 5.7.6.6.5..9..5.6.76.97...4 A A without NSTC E A Bovaird Drive at Mississauga Road Modifications to this roundabout would be necessary for the horizon year. The southbound approach would need three lanes entering instead of two and the eastbound approach would require a fourth entering lane to accommodate the high level of right-turn movements from Bovaird Drive to southbound on Mississauga Road. The proposed geometry would be as follows: three entering lanes on all but the east leg where four entering lanes would be needed. If the eastbound right-turn movements at this intersection were put in a by-pass to the roundabout, then three lanes could enter on the east approach as well because of the left-turn volume, one of the three lanes should be a dedicated left-turn on the north and west approaches a 7m ICD The complications of having a fourth lane entering for drivers and the possibility of a necessary right-turn lane by-passing the roundabout make it more difficult for motorists to navigate. Also, additional right-of-way would be needed to accommodate the geometry. Bovaird Drive at Heritage Road two entering lanes on all approaches a 5m ICD A roundabout at this location is feasible based on the capacity analysis for the scenario with the NSTC, however, a traffic signal can handle the level of expected for the horizon year. Also, to be consistent with other area controls along Bovaird Drive, a roundabout is not recommended in this location. In addition, the collision history on Bovaird Drive does not indicate any problematic movements at this intersection. ENTRA Consultants 8// Page 59

Bovaird Drive at Caseley Street The design of this roundabout is identical to the design and, therefore, the evaluation is the same. a single entering lane on all approaches a 4m ICD A roundabout at this location is feasible based on the capacity analysis, however, due to space limitations on the roadway and the level of traffic on Caseley Street, a roundabout in this location is not recommended or preferred. 4. Summary Based on the traffic analysis, the road network with the NSTC connections is the preferred scenario as traffic delay and LOS for the Bovaird Drive corridor improves significantly on Bovaird Drive and the surrounding intersections. Roundabouts are not recommended because of the size and impact on surrounding land, speed on the roadway, entry and exit width of the Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road roundabout in the horizon year, grades, intersection control, continuity and the ability of signals to handle the expected traffic. Since the PM peak hour assessment indicates that roundabouts are infeasible, an AM peak hour assessment is not required. Overall, the intersection of Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road operates at a satisfactory level of service with the double westbound left-turn lanes in the horizon year. It is recommended that the intersection be constructed with a single left-turn lane on all approaches for the horizon year and protect for a double westbound left-turn lane and northbound left-turn lane for future conditions. (However, this proposed staging is subject to environmental, political and social factors.) This finding is consistent with the Mount Pleasant Block 5- Collector Road EA and Transportation Study, which notes that the intersection, while busy, would operate with an appropriate LOS with single left-turn lanes. All other intersections operate with acceptable LOS with the preferred road network in the PM conditions. Page 6 /6/ ENTRA Consultants

5. Recommendations The recommended solution is a multi-modal approach to improving Bovaird Drive to accommodate traffic in the and horizon years. Recommended TDM measures include encouraging increased carpooling, cycling and walking, to shift travel away from single-occupant vehicles. To facilitate the movement of pedestrians, cyclists and other non-motorized forms of propulsion, the preferred alternative will include a sidewalk on the south side and a multi-use path on the north side of Bovaird Drive. Recommended transit measures for Bovaird Drive include those provided in the Brampton TTMP, which recommend BRT service from Mississauga Road to Airport Road. Bovaird Drive is planned as a primary transit corridor by (with transit vehicle headways of five minutes or less). To improve transit efficiency throughout the Bovaird Drive corridor, transit queue jump lanes are included in the preferred alternative at all approaches with Mississauga Road and at the east and west approaches with Heritage Road, Creditview Road/James Potter Drive and Ashby Field Road. To accommodate projected auto and truck volumes, based on the traffic analysis, the recommended road network for and is described below and was previously shown in Exhibit and Exhibit. The study assumes that the NXTC will be in place by and recommendations are consistent with findings in the Peel Long Range Transportation Study and the Brampton Transportation and Transit Master Plan.. Bovaird Drive and Worthington Avenue/Lake Louise Drive The current road network configuration at this intersection is not expected to change from current conditions.. Bovaird Drive and Ashby Field Road Bovaird Drive is expected to widen to three lanes in each direction for and east and west of Ashby Field Road. Some modifications are recommended to the storage lanes and tapers for both Bovaird Drive and Ashby Field Road, as shown in Exhibit.. Bovaird Drive and Creditview Road/James Potter Road The lane configuration for the intersection is as follows: Bovaird Drive is expected to have three through lanes and exclusive right-turn and left-turn lanes at the intersection. There are two through lanes expected northbound and southbound with left-turn and right-turn lanes on the north and south approaches. Regarding the eastbound left-turn lane at the intersection, note that subsequent to the traffic analyses completed for this Bovaird EA study, the Mount Pleasant Block 5- Transportation Study and Collector Road EA was completed by BA Group in ENTRA Consultants 8// Page 6

January 4,, with an updated traffic analyses submitted to the Region of Peel on April 6,. Based on the model outputs provided by the Region, our work completed for the Mount Pleasant Secondary Plan Area Transportation Master Plan, and the balancing of volumes throughout the Bovaird Drive corridor, weekday PM peak hour eastbound left-turn volumes at the future Bovaird Drive and Creditview Road intersection are estimated to be approximately 59 vehicles. Comments provided by the Region on the Block 5- Transportation Study and Collector Road EA, dated February,, indicate that the estimated total traffic weekday PM peak hour eastbound left-turn volumes of 66 vehicles shown in the study is overstated by about 5 percent due differences in modelling results between Brampton s model and the Region s model. If this is the case, ENTRA expects that the eastbound left-turn movement could be accommodated by a single left-turn lane. 4. Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road Bovaird Drive is expected to widen on the east and west sides of Mississauga Road in both the and horizon years. Mississauga Road is expected to widen to three lanes north and south of the intersection of Bovaird Drive with Mississauga Road tapering to a four-lane cross-section further north. The intersection configuration for the horizon year is as follows: Three through lanes on Mississauga Road on both the north and south approaches. Three through lanes on Bovaird Drive in both the east and west approaches. Single left-turn and right-turn lanes on all approaches with storage lanes and taper widths as shown in Exhibit. Protection for future double left-turn lanes on the east leg (westbound) and the south leg (northbound). However, the opportunity for staging is subject to social, political and environmental factors. The intersection additions for the horizon year are as follows: An additional left-turn lane on the south leg (northbound). The analysis indicates that an additional left-turn lane on the east leg (westbound) will be required in the horizon year. The storage and taper lengths in Exhibit show what is required for the double left-turn lane for the westbound left-turn movement. 5. Bovaird Cross-section Transitioning From Mississauga Road heading west, Bovaird Drive will turn from a six-lane cross-section to a four-lane cross-section and then to a two-lane cross section further west past Heritage Road. Page 6 /6/ ENTRA Consultants

6. Bovaird Drive and Heritage Road Heritage Road will widen to a four-lane cross-section north and south of Bovaird Road in the and horizon years. Bovaird Drive will have a four-lane cross-section north and south of Heritage Road, however, the cross-section between Heritage Road and Mississauga Road could change depending on the final location of the NSTC. Modifications to the geometry include left-turn lanes on Heritage Road and modifications to the storage and taper lengths, as shown in Exhibit. 7. Bovaird Drive and Caseley Street This intersection is expected to operate well in both and and no modifications are expected to be needed. Proposed storage and taper lengths for the and horizon years are taken from the SimTraffic and Region methodology for calculating queues. While reviewing right-turn vehicle queues during the SimTraffic simulations, we noted that if the right turn-lane was temporarily blocked by through lane queues, then the 95th percentile queue was recorded at the point where a right-turning vehicle waits in the through lane to enter the exclusive right-turn lane. This occurred only in a few cases (at Bovaird Drive and Ashby Field Road for westbound right-turn movements and at Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road for eastbound and westbound right-turn movements). Since this is not an appropriate measure of right-turn lane storage requirements, for these cases, the Synchro queues (and Peel Region methodology queues) were compared to the SimTraffic results. Transportation Association of Canada (TAC) methodology was used for the calculation of taper lengths. The recommended storage and taper lengths are shown in Exhibit. ENTRA Consultants 8// Page 6

Page 64 /6/ ENTRA Consultants

Exhibit - Recommended Storage and Taper Lengths Approach Intersection Existing Required Required Proposed Proposed Design Movement Required Proposed Required Proposed Taper Taper Taper Taper Taper Speed No. of Lanes Existing Storage (m) Storage Storage Storage Storage (m) Ratio d Length (km/h) (m) (m) (m) (m) (m) (m) (m) (m) Bovaird Drive @ Worthington Avenue North (SB) Left Turn 9 84 9 9 9 a 4: - 7: 49-59.5 a a 6 South (NB) Left Turn 5 5 a 4 5 a 4: - 7: 49-59.5 a a 6 South (NB) Left Turn 5 5 4 5 4: - 7: 49-59.5 6 West (EB) Left Turn 9 a 5 a 75 7: - : 59.5-8.5 75 a 75 a 8 Left Turn 9 8 9 a 6 9 a 7: - : 59.5-8.5 a a East (WB) Right Turn 9 44 9 a 56 9 a 8 7: - 4: 59.5-84 8 a 8 a Bovaird Drive @ Ashby Field Road North (SB) Double Left Turn + 4+5 + a 4+48 + a 6 South (NB) Left Turn 75 49 8 77 8 7 4: - 7: 49-59.5 7 a 7 a 6 Left Turn 48 c 4 c 7: - : 59.5-8.5 8 8 West (EB) East (WB) Right Turn 9 9 6 7: - 4: 59.5-84 6 6 Left Turn 5 95 c 4 95 c 9 7: - : 59.5-8.5 8 8 Right Turn a a 9 7: - 4: 59.5-84 9 a 9 a Bovaird Drive @ Mississauga Road Left Turn 8 86 9 5 9 7 7: - : 59.5-8.5 6 6 North (SB) Right Turn 4 5 5 7: - 4: 59.5-84 6 6 Left Turn 6 5 5 5 7: - : 59.5-8.5 6 6 South (NB) 9 Double Left Turn 5 7: - : 59.5-8.5 6 6 Right Turn 7 95 7: - 4: 59.5-84 6 6 West (EB) Left Turn 5 64 5 45 7: - : 59.5-8.5 6 6 Right Turn 74 75 6 75 88 7: - 4: 59.5-84 6 6 8 Left Turn 6 47 5 5 5 7: - : 59.5-8.5 6 6 East (WB) Double Left Turn 47 5 7: - : 59.5-8.5 6 6 8 Right Turn 4 5 4 5 7: - 4: 59.5-84 6 6 Bovaird Drive @ Heritage Road North (SB) Left Turn 7 7: - : 59.5-7 6 6 7 South (NB) Left Turn 7 4 7: - : 59.5-7 6 6 7 Left Turn 5 6 5 a 5 5 a 7 7: - : 59.5-8.5 7 7 West (EB) East (WB) Right Turn 7 7: - 4: 59.5-84 7 7 Left Turn 55 5 55 a 7 55 a 7: - : 59.5-8.5 Right Turn 5 6 4 7: - 4: 59.5-84 7 7 Bovaird Drive @ Creditview Road Left Turn 5 8 85 7: - : 59.5-8.5 6 6 North (SB) South (NB) West (EB) East (WB) Right Turn 9 95 8 95 7: - 4: 59.5-84 6 6 Left Turn 8 4 8 85 7: - : 59.5-8.5 6 6 Right Turn 7 68 7 7: - 4: 59.5-84 6 6 Left Turn 6 8 78 8 7: - : 59.5-8.5 6 6 Right Turn 8 4 8 7: - 4: 59.5-84 6 6 Left Turn 7 85 84 85 7: - : 59.5-8.5 6 6 Right Turn 48 7 75 7: - 4: 59.5-84 6 6 8 8 8 9 8 8 8 8 8 8 a = no change from existing storage/taper lengths b = storage is provided within right-turn channelized island c = proposed storage length is less than existing due to proposed intersection spacing on Bovaird Drive between Creditview Road and Ashby Field Road d = Taper ratios are based on Table..5. and Table..8. in TAC's Geometric Design Guide for Canadian Roads

6. Summary The findings of the traffic analysis of Bovaird Drive can be summarized as follows: 6. Existing Conditions Based on the capacity analysis for the existing signalized intersections, all intersections currently operate at satisfactory LOS. The westbound left-turn movement at the intersection of Bovaird Drive with Mississauga Road is over capacity in the AM peak hour. This is due in large part to the left-turning volume at this intersection of vehicles as opposed to 6 vehicles per hour travelling in one eastbound through lane. Based on the capacity analysis, the existing unsignalized intersection of Bovaird Drive and Caseley Street has no capacity problems and operates at an acceptable level of service during all peak hours. 6. Future Roadway and Intersection Improvements Bovaird Drive is expected to widen to three lanes in each direction from west of Worthington Avenue to west of Mississauga Road. Mississauga Road is expected to widen to a four-lane cross-section further north. Heritage Road will widen to a four-lane cross-section north and south of Bovaird Drive in the and horizon years. Bovaird Drive will have four a lane cross-section north and south of Heritage Road, however, the cross-section between Heritage Road and Mississauga Road could change depending on the final location of the NSTC. The intersection configuration for Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road for the horizon year is as follows: Three through lanes on Mississauga Road on both the north and south approaches. Three through lanes on Bovaird Drive in both the east and west directions. Single left-turn and right-turn lanes on all approaches. Protection for future double left-turn lanes on the east leg (westbound) and the south leg (northbound). However, the opportunity for staging is subject to social, political and environmental factors. The intersection additions for the horizon year are as follows: An additional left-turn lane on the south leg (northbound). An additional left-turn lane on the east leg (westbound). The Region should monitor this movement to determine when the second left-turn lane is needed prior to the horizon year. ENTRA Consultants 8// Page 67

Modifications to the geometry include left-turn lanes on Heritage Drive. 6. Conditions Overall, all intersections will operate at a satisfactory LOS with the NSTC and the connection to Bovaird Drive. However, the option without the NSTC fails at the intersection with Mississauga Road with the westbound left-turn and northbound left-turn lanes operating over capacity. Roundabouts are not recommended because of the size and impact on surrounding land, speed on the roadway, grades, intersection control, continuity and the ability of signals to handle the expected traffic. The intersection capacity analysis for the unsignalized intersection of Bovaird Drive and Caseley Street indicates that the intersection will operate at a good LOS in the horizon year. 6.4 Conditions Based on the traffic analysis, the road network with the NSTC connections is the preferred scenario as traffic delay and LOS for the Bovaird Drive corridor improves significantly on Bovaird Drive and the surrounding intersections. Roundabouts are not recommended because of the size and impact on surrounding land, speed on the roadway, entry and width of the Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road roundabout in the horizon year, grades, intersection control, continuity and the ability of signals to handle the expected traffic. Overall, the intersection of Bovaird Drive and Mississauga Road operates at a satisfactory LOS with or without the double westbound left-turn lanes in the horizon year. It is recommended that the intersection be constructed with a single left-turn lane on all approaches for the horizon year and protect for a double westbound left-turn lane and northbound left-turn lane for future conditions. (However, the staging is subject to environmental, political and social considerations.) With the inclusion of the northbound and westbound double left-turn lanes, the movements are expected to operate at a LOS F, but below a volume-to- capacity ratio of. during the weekday PM peak hour. The eastbound through, southbound left-turn and southbound through movements are expected to operate at a LOS E. Although these results are typical of heavily utilized urban arterial roadways, these individual movements may improve through the reassignment of background traffic throughout the overall road network in the future. Overall, all other intersections operate with acceptable LOS with the preferred road network in conditions for the AM and PM peak hours. 9-55rep-8-FinalReport.docx Page 68 /6/ ENTRA Consultants

Appendices A. Existing Traffic Data B. Synchro Intersection Capacity Analysis C. Level of Service Definitions D. Region of Peel Queuing Methodology E. HP BATS EMME Model F. RODEL Capacity Output Excellence in Transportation Planning

Appendix A Existing Traffic Data Excellence in Transportation Planning

Traffic Counts Excellence in Transportation Planning

MG8 ENG Morning Peak Diagram Specified Period From:!"##"## To: $"##"## One Hour Peak From:!"##"## To: %"##"## Municipality: Site #: Intersection: TFR File #: Count date: &'()*+,*-,.''/ #!$%$ *4)56,75)',8,9*5:;)+(:*+,<'+= >$?@'A?>##$ Weather conditions: @=++B Person(s) who counted: CD&<E ** Signalized Intersection ** Major Road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omments

MG8 ENG Mid-day Peak Diagram Specified Period From: "##"## To: M"##"## One Hour Peak From: L"##"## To: M"##"## Municipality: Site #: Intersection: TFR File #: Count date: &'()*+,*-,.''/ #!$%$ *4)56,75)',8,9*5:;)+(:*+,<'+= >$?@'A?>##$ Weather conditions: @=++B Person(s) who counted: CD&<E ** Signalized Intersection ** Major Road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omments

MG8 ENG Afternoon Peak Diagram Specified Period From: N"##"## To: %"##"## One Hour Peak From: "MN"## To:!"MN"## Municipality: Site #: Intersection: TFR File #: Count date: &'()*+,*-,.''/ #!$%$ *4)56,75)',8,9*5:;)+(:*+,<'+= >$?@'A?>##$ Weather conditions: @=++B Person(s) who counted: CD&<E ** Signalized Intersection ** Major Road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omments

MG8 ENG Total Count Diagram Municipality: Site #: Intersection: TFR File #: Count date: &'()*+,*-,.''/ #!$%$ *4)56,75)',8,9*5:;)+(:*+,<'+= >$?@'A?>##$ Weather conditions: @=++B Person(s) who counted: CD&<E ** Signalized Intersection ** Major Road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omments

MG8 ENG Traffic Count Summary Intersection: *4)56,75)',8,9*5:;)+(:*+,<'+ Count Date: >$?@'A?>##$ S*=5 H+6)+( North Approach Totals Municipality: &'()*+,*-,.''/ South Approach Totals Q+O/=6'F,K45FR,J5=OPFR,8,KBO/)F:F E*5:;G@*=:; Q+O/=6'F,K45FR,J5=OPFR,8,KBO/)F:F T54+6 J*:4/ J*:4/ S*=5 T54+6 I'-: J;5= &)(;: J*:4/.'6F <AA5*4O;'F H+6)+( I'-: J;5= &)(;: J*:4/!"##"## >> > L> N # N%!"##"## > # # > # %"##"## >$! L > N$M L $ %"##"## M > L# $! L $"##"## >> NM # M> N#> $"##"## N L> >$! "##"##! >M # >N "##"## # # # >"##"## #N >$ N! $ M >L >"##"## # L> L#!> L"##"## L% %! >% M L$# L"##"## >M MM L #M M"##"## $ N# #! LM% N N#> M"##"## M% N% M% NM > N"##"##!! N # N N"##"## # # # # # "##"## NN M L% M#! M ML% "##"## N # L!"##"## >> >N! >M L L%!"##"## >N >L NM # %"##"## L N! L$ LN$ L ML %"##"##! L% $ NM J*:4/.'6F J*:4/F" S*=5 H+6)+( N# M#! #> >$!# >! LN N% >!> >N MN # East Approach Totals West Approach Totals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alculated Values for Traffic Crossing Major Street S*=5F,H+6)+(" K5*FF)+(,U4/='F" %"## L$> $"## LN! >"##!# L"## >L M"## L># "## LLM!"## %L %"## >!

MG8 ENG Morning Peak Diagram Specified Period From: 7:: To: 9:: One Hour Peak From: 7:: To: 8:: Municipality: Site #: Intersection: TFR File #: Count date: Region of Peel na Bovaird Drive & Ashby Field -Dec-9 Weather conditions: Cold, light snow in the morning Person(s) who counted: MIRELA ** Signalized Intersection ** Major Road: Bovaird Drive runs W/E North Leg Total: 7 Cyclists Cyclists East Leg Total: 848 North Entering: 54 Trucks Trucks East Entering: 94 North Peds: Cars 9 5 9 5 Cars 5 East Peds: 8 Peds Cross: Totals 5 9 Totals 8 Peds Cross: Cyclists Trucks Cars Totals 49 74 78 Bovaird Dr Cyclists Trucks Cars Totals 47 78 88 5 8 GO Transit Access N W E S Ashby Field Cars Trucks Cyclists Totals 67 67 666 47 7 4 44 875 49 Bovaird Dr Cars Trucks Cyclists Totals 876 48 94 Peds Cross: Cars 87 Cars 59 8 66 5 Peds Cross: West Peds: Trucks Trucks South Peds: West Entering: 88 Cyclists Cyclists South Entering: 55 West Leg Total: 665 Totals 9 Totals 6 8 67 South Leg Total: 45 Comments

MG8 ENG Mid-day Peak Diagram Specified Period From: :: To: 4:: One Hour Peak From: :: To: :: Municipality: Site #: Intersection: TFR File #: Count date: Region of Peel na Bovaird Drive & Ashby Field -Dec-9 Weather conditions: Cold, light snow in the morning Person(s) who counted: MIRELA ** Signalized Intersection ** Major Road: Bovaird Drive runs W/E North Leg Total: 59 Cyclists Cyclists East Leg Total: North Entering: Trucks Trucks East Entering: 568 North Peds: Cars 5 9 Cars 6 East Peds: Peds Cross: Totals 7 Totals 8 Peds Cross: Cyclists Trucks Cars Totals 59 46 5 Bovaird Dr Cyclists Trucks Cars Totals 6 8 48 4 469 5 7 55 449 GO Transit Access N W E S Ashby Field Cars Trucks Cyclists Totals 9 9 4 54 486 6 6 54 54 Bovaird Dr Cars Trucks Cyclists Totals 49 5 54 Peds Cross: Cars 87 Cars 5 5 76 Peds Cross: West Peds: Trucks 5 Trucks 5 South Peds: West Entering: 54 Cyclists Cyclists South Entering: 8 West Leg Total: 5 Totals 9 Totals 8 5 South Leg Total: 7 Comments

MG8 ENG Afternoon Peak Diagram Specified Period From: 5:: To: 8:: One Hour Peak From: 6:45: To: 7:45: Municipality: Site #: Intersection: TFR File #: Count date: Region of Peel na Bovaird Drive & Ashby Field -Dec-9 Weather conditions: Cold, light snow in the morning Person(s) who counted: MIRELA ** Signalized Intersection ** Major Road: Bovaird Drive runs W/E North Leg Total: 6 Cyclists Cyclists East Leg Total: 7 North Entering: 8 Trucks Trucks East Entering: 984 North Peds: Cars 46 57 77 8 Cars 56 East Peds: Peds Cross: Totals 46 57 77 Totals 56 Peds Cross: Cyclists Trucks Cars Totals 5 95 94 Bovaird Dr Cyclists Trucks Cars Totals 6 6 4 7 765 65 66 44 79 GO Transit Access N W E S Ashby Field Cars Trucks Cyclists Totals 7 7 8 855 9 9 95 Bovaird Dr Cars Trucks Cyclists Totals 98 4 Peds Cross: Cars 4 Cars 7 8 Peds Cross: West Peds: 5 Trucks Trucks South Peds: West Entering: 87 Cyclists Cyclists South Entering: West Leg Total: 777 Totals 5 Totals 9 8 South Leg Total: 48 Comments

MG8 ENG Total Count Diagram Municipality: Site #: Intersection: TFR File #: Count date: Region of Peel na Bovaird Drive & Ashby Field -Dec-9 Weather conditions: Cold, light snow in the morning Person(s) who counted: MIRELA ** Signalized Intersection ** Major Road: Bovaird Drive runs W/E North Leg Total: 7 Cyclists Cyclists East Leg Total: 55 North Entering: 54 Trucks 8 Trucks 4 East Entering: 6 North Peds: 4 Cars 8 9 56 5 Cars 46 East Peds: 5 Peds Cross: Totals 9 94 59 Totals 474 Peds Cross: Cyclists Trucks Cars Totals 46 566 557 Bovaird Dr Cyclists Trucks Cars Totals 55 66 5 48 558 7 7 87 8 58 GO Transit Access N W E S Ashby Field Cars Trucks Cyclists Totals 8 4 488 8 588 5 5 5646 86 Bovaird Dr Cars Trucks Cyclists Totals 5659 6 6 Peds Cross: Cars 86 Cars 76 67 5 84 Peds Cross: West Peds: 7 Trucks Trucks 8 6 4 South Peds: 5 West Entering: 55 Cyclists Cyclists South Entering: 868 West Leg Total: 84 Totals 884 Totals 95 67 56 South Leg Total: 75 Comments

MG8 ENG Traffic Count Summary Intersection: Bovaird Drive & Ashby Field Count Date: -Dec-9 Municipality: Region of Peel Hour Ending North Approach Totals Includes Cars, Trucks, & Cyclists Grand Left Thru Right Total Total Peds North/South Total Approaches Hour Ending South Approach Totals Includes Cars, Trucks, & Cyclists Grand Left Thru Right Total 7:: 7:: 8:: 8 7 65 8:: 5 6 46 9:: 5 5 7 9:: 56 8 4 :: 6 :: :: 7 8 :: 8 8 59 85 :: 7 :: 8 5 8 4:: 6 94 4:: 9 44 74 5:: 5:: 6:: 4 5 6 6:: 4 68 4 7:: 6 5 4 44 7:: 4 6 6 8:: 97 58 48 48 8:: 5 79 5 Total Peds Totals: Hour Ending 59 94 9 54 4 4 95 67 56 868 5 East Approach Totals West Approach Totals Includes Cars, Trucks, & Cyclists Grand Left Thru Right Total Total Peds East/West Total Approaches Hour Ending Includes Cars, Trucks, & Cyclists Grand Left Thru Right Total 7:: 7:: 8:: 7 674 9 89 7 74 8:: 7 764 8 9:: 5 66 7 55 9:: 8 78 8 :: 4 46 :: :: 4 45 5 5 4 99 :: 5 47 49 :: 6 486 9 568 7 :: 8 469 7 54 4:: 5 458 6 55 5 994 4:: 4 446 9 469 5:: 5:: 6:: 88 75 7 856 68 6:: 5 7 45 75 7:: 89 88 99 79 7:: 4 78 56 798 8:: 8 8 94 774 8:: 5 764 65 84 5 Total Peds Totals: 5 588 4 6 5 54 66 558 87 55 7 Calculated Values for Traffic Crossing Major Street Hours Ending: Crossing Values: 8: 9: 85 : 44 : 6 4: 5 6: 7 7: 77 8: 5

MG8 ENG Morning Peak Diagram Specified Period From: 7:: To: 9:: One Hour Peak From: 7:45: To: 8:45: Municipality: Site #: Intersection: TFR File #: Count date: Region of Peel na Bovaird Drive & Mississauga Road -Dec-9 Weather conditions: Clear weather, light snow in the morning Person(s) who counted: MOMO MIROSLAV ** Signalized Intersection ** Major Road: Bovaird Drive runs W/E North Leg Total: 6 Cyclists Cyclists East Leg Total: 65 North Entering: 56 Trucks 7 Trucks East Entering: 775 North Peds: Cars 457 7 486 Cars East Peds: Peds Cross: Totals 474 9 Totals 6 Peds Cross: Cyclists Trucks Cars Totals 46 5 556 Bovaird Dr Cyclists Trucks Cars Totals 4 7 589 6 8 4 4 87 Mississauga Rd N W E S Mississauga Rd Cars Trucks Cyclists Totals 6 7 48 4 458 85 5 79 66 Bovaird Dr Cars Trucks Cyclists Totals 787 4 8 Peds Cross: Cars 956 Cars 8 8 8 44 Peds Cross: West Peds: Trucks 5 Trucks 5 9 4 South Peds: West Entering: 859 Cyclists Cyclists South Entering: 68 West Leg Total: 45 Totals 6 Totals 85 9 9 South Leg Total: 74 Comments

MG8 ENG Mid-day Peak Diagram Specified Period From: :: To: 4:: One Hour Peak From: :45: To: :45: Municipality: Site #: Intersection: TFR File #: Count date: Region of Peel na Bovaird Drive & Mississauga Road -Dec-9 Weather conditions: Clear weather, light snow in the morning Person(s) who counted: MOMO MIROSLAV ** Signalized Intersection ** Major Road: Bovaird Drive runs W/E North Leg Total: 6 Cyclists Cyclists East Leg Total: 976 North Entering: 5 Trucks 7 Trucks 8 East Entering: 496 North Peds: Cars 68 8 98 Cars 9 East Peds: Peds Cross: Totals 4 8 Totals Peds Cross: Cyclists Trucks Cars Totals 6 6 45 Bovaird Dr Cyclists Trucks Cars Totals 7 8 46 8 8 6 74 65 55 Mississauga Rd N W E S Mississauga Rd Cars Trucks Cyclists Totals 7 85 4 8 4 4 48 46 7 Bovaird Dr Cars Trucks Cyclists Totals 45 65 48 Peds Cross: Cars 54 Cars 65 65 5 45 Peds Cross: West Peds: Trucks 49 Trucks 8 8 7 4 South Peds: West Entering: 4 Cyclists Cyclists South Entering: 88 West Leg Total: 845 Totals Totals 8 7 South Leg Total: 59 Comments

MG8 ENG Afternoon Peak Diagram Specified Period From: 5:: To: 8:: One Hour Peak From: 6:5: To: 7:5: Municipality: Site #: Intersection: TFR File #: Count date: Region of Peel na Bovaird Drive & Mississauga Road -Dec-9 Weather conditions: Clear weather, light snow in the morning Person(s) who counted: MOMO MIROSLAV ** Signalized Intersection ** Major Road: Bovaird Drive runs W/E North Leg Total: 79 Cyclists Cyclists East Leg Total: 774 North Entering: Trucks 4 7 Trucks East Entering: 964 North Peds: Cars 56 9 Cars 487 East Peds: Peds Cross: Totals 7 6 Totals 58 Peds Cross: Cyclists Trucks Cars Totals 5 888 9 Bovaird Dr Cyclists Trucks Cars Totals 4 7 47 45 9 8 9 6 5 Mississauga Rd N W E S Mississauga Rd Cars Trucks Cyclists Totals 45 48 67 684 7 5 95 9 Bovaird Dr Cars Trucks Cyclists Totals 775 5 8 Peds Cross: Cars 456 Cars 49 7 948 Peds Cross: West Peds: Trucks Trucks 4 46 South Peds: West Entering: 569 Cyclists Cyclists South Entering: 994 West Leg Total: 49 Totals 487 Totals 4 9 South Leg Total: 48 Comments

MG8 ENG Total Count Diagram Municipality: Site #: Intersection: TFR File #: Count date: Region of Peel na Bovaird Drive & Mississauga Road -Dec-9 Weather conditions: Clear weather, light snow in the morning Person(s) who counted: MOMO MIROSLAV ** Signalized Intersection ** Major Road: Bovaird Drive runs W/E North Leg Total: 675 Cyclists Cyclists East Leg Total: 8 North Entering: 858 Trucks 6 4 5 Trucks East Entering: 5575 North Peds: Cars 9 467 46 76 Cars 684 East Peds: Peds Cross: Totals 9 569 6 Totals 87 Peds Cross: Cyclists Trucks Cars Totals 46 44 4758 Bovaird Dr Cyclists Trucks Cars Totals 4 7 6 44 557 9 867 959 4 69 44 Mississauga Rd N W E S Mississauga Rd Cars Trucks Cyclists Totals 8 5 95 44 68 68 56 6 697 555 49 Bovaird Dr Cars Trucks Cyclists Totals 544 6 4 558 Peds Cross: Cars 895 Cars 84 77 688 899 Peds Cross: West Peds: Trucks 9 Trucks 84 98 South Peds: West Entering: 4677 Cyclists Cyclists South Entering: 498 West Leg Total: 945 Totals 45 Totals 946 46 79 South Leg Total: 84 Comments

MG8 ENG Traffic Count Summary Intersection: Bovaird Drive & Mississauga Road Count Date: -Dec-9 Hour Ending North Approach Totals Includes Cars, Trucks, & Cyclists Grand Left Thru Right Total Total Peds North/South Total Approaches Hour Ending Municipality: Region of Peel South Approach Totals Includes Cars, Trucks, & Cyclists Grand Left Thru Right Total 7:: 7:: 8:: 5 4 47 796 8:: 7 95 94 59 9:: 5 459 7 49 855 9:: 8 9 9 64 :: 5 7 4 9 :: 7 48 :: 4 8 4 4 :: 64 67 6 57 :: 9 94 6 9 46 :: 88 8 6 7 4:: 8 8 95 4:: 88 84 84 5:: 5 6 8 5:: 6:: 96 4 4 779 6:: 49 5 5 66 7:: 5 6 7 8 7:: 4 49 44 977 8:: 6 9 8 5 7 8:: 86 65 4 964 Total Peds Totals: Hour Ending 6 569 9 858 656 946 46 79 498 East Approach Totals West Approach Totals Includes Cars, Trucks, & Cyclists Grand Left Thru Right Total Total Peds East/West Total Approaches Hour Ending Includes Cars, Trucks, & Cyclists Grand Left Thru Right Total 7:: 7:: 8:: 56 79 6 64 57 8:: 6 4 876 9:: 469 8 6 9:: 6 8 :: 5 66 87 :: 64 9 85 :: 4 77 7 447 85 :: 8 4 :: 4 97 9 457 867 :: 6 7 4 4:: 54 5 8 5 95 4:: 6 64 9 5:: 7 6 5:: 6:: 89 57 5 775 6:: 49 6 555 7:: 65 96 469 7:: 8 44 9 56 8:: 67 7 89 459 8:: 4 46 8 568 Total Peds Totals: 697 68 95 5575 5 6 557 959 4677 Calculated Values for Traffic Crossing Major Street Hours Ending: Crossing Values: 8: 498 9: 554 : 89 : 4: 8 6: 47 7: 658 8: 568

MG8 ENG Morning Peak Diagram Specified Period From: 7:: To: 9:: One Hour Peak From: 7:: To: 8:: Municipality: Site #: Intersection: TFR File #: Count date: Region of Peel 74 Bovaird Drive & Heritage Rd -Dec-9 Weather conditions: Clear and cold, light snow Person(s) who counted: VELE ** Signalized Intersection ** Major Road: Bovaird Drive runs W/E North Leg Total: Cyclists Cyclists East Leg Total: 45 North Entering: 59 Trucks Trucks East Entering: 55 North Peds: Cars 7 9 58 Cars 4 East Peds: Peds Cross: Totals 7 Totals 4 Peds Cross: Cyclists Trucks Cars Totals 459 489 Bovaird Dr Cyclists Trucks Cars Totals 4 86 89 4 5 4 98 Heritage Rd N W E S Heritage Rd Cars Trucks Cyclists Totals 46 456 58 58 485 Bovaird Dr Cars Trucks Cyclists Totals 9 95 Peds Cross: Cars Cars 6 7 9 Peds Cross: West Peds: Trucks Trucks South Peds: West Entering: 96 Cyclists Cyclists South Entering: 4 West Leg Total: 45 Totals Totals 6 8 South Leg Total: 7 Comments

MG8 ENG Mid-day Peak Diagram Specified Period From: :: To: 4:: One Hour Peak From: :: To: :: Municipality: Site #: Intersection: TFR File #: Count date: Region of Peel 74 Bovaird Drive & Heritage Rd -Dec-9 Weather conditions: Clear and cold, light snow Person(s) who counted: VELE ** Signalized Intersection ** Major Road: Bovaird Drive runs W/E North Leg Total: 9 Cyclists Cyclists East Leg Total: 86 North Entering: 4 Trucks Trucks East Entering: 45 North Peds: Cars 8 Cars 4 East Peds: Peds Cross: Totals 8 Totals 5 Peds Cross: Cyclists Trucks Cars Totals 59 64 4 Bovaird Dr Cyclists Trucks Cars Totals 5 5 5 68 49 8 8 5 9 Heritage Rd N W E S Heritage Rd Cars Trucks Cyclists Totals 8 9 5 59 49 7 7 75 6 Bovaird Dr Cars Trucks Cyclists Totals 77 5 48 Peds Cross: Cars 7 Cars 6 6 Peds Cross: West Peds: Trucks Trucks South Peds: West Entering: 44 Cyclists Cyclists South Entering: West Leg Total: 865 Totals 8 Totals 6 6 South Leg Total: 5 Comments

MG8 ENG Afternoon Peak Diagram Specified Period From: 5:: To: 8:: One Hour Peak From: 6:: To: 7:: Municipality: Site #: Intersection: TFR File #: Count date: Region of Peel 74 Bovaird Drive & Heritage Rd -Dec-9 Weather conditions: Clear and cold, light snow Person(s) who counted: VELE ** Signalized Intersection ** Major Road: Bovaird Drive runs W/E North Leg Total: 68 Cyclists Cyclists East Leg Total: 59 North Entering: Trucks Trucks East Entering: 94 North Peds: Cars 7 9 4 Cars 48 East Peds: Peds Cross: Totals 7 9 4 Totals 48 Peds Cross: Cyclists Trucks Cars Totals 99 96 Bovaird Dr Cyclists Trucks Cars Totals 5 5 9 48 59 8 8 9 5 Heritage Rd N W E S Heritage Rd Cars Trucks Cyclists Totals 886 98 99 Bovaird Dr Cars Trucks Cyclists Totals 549 9 578 Peds Cross: Cars 8 Cars 46 65 Peds Cross: West Peds: Trucks Trucks South Peds: West Entering: 54 Cyclists Cyclists South Entering: West Leg Total: 5 Totals 8 Totals 46 65 South Leg Total: 6 Comments

MG8 ENG Total Count Diagram Municipality: Site #: Intersection: TFR File #: Count date: Region of Peel 74 Bovaird Drive & Heritage Rd -Dec-9 Weather conditions: Clear and cold, light snow Person(s) who counted: VELE ** Signalized Intersection ** Major Road: Bovaird Drive runs W/E North Leg Total: 784 Cyclists Cyclists East Leg Total: 9445 North Entering: 8 Trucks 5 Trucks 5 East Entering: 479 North Peds: Cars 9 7 58 75 Cars 99 East Peds: Peds Cross: Totals 9 6 Totals 44 Peds Cross: Cyclists Trucks Cars Totals 6 46 466 Bovaird Dr Cyclists Trucks Cars Totals 4 5 448 447 4 8 7 496 Heritage Rd N W E S Heritage Rd Cars Trucks Cyclists Totals 55 58 49 6 4456 5 496 Bovaird Dr Cars Trucks Cyclists Totals 484 476 Peds Cross: Cars 56 Cars 7 78 55 Peds Cross: West Peds: Trucks 9 Trucks 6 7 South Peds: West Entering: 474 Cyclists Cyclists South Entering: 5 West Leg Total: 987 Totals 57 Totals 7 85 South Leg Total: 96 Comments

MG8 ENG Traffic Count Summary Intersection: Bovaird Drive & Heritage Rd Count Date: -Dec-9 Municipality: Region of Peel Hour Ending North Approach Totals Includes Cars, Trucks, & Cyclists Grand Left Thru Right Total Total Peds North/South Total Approaches Hour Ending South Approach Totals Includes Cars, Trucks, & Cyclists Grand Left Thru Right Total 7:: 7:: 8:: 9 6 47 67 8:: 6 9:: 7 75 7 9 54 9:: 9 9 7 5 :: 4 :: 7 9 :: 8 5 6 5 :: 9 6 6 :: 4 5 6 :: 4 4 4:: 6 5 7 8 4 4:: 6 9 6 5:: 5:: 6:: 4 8 7 9 64 6:: 8 6 45 7:: 7 9 8 4 57 7:: 68 4 8:: 7 8 8 46 8:: 48 5 75 8 Total Peds Totals: Hour Ending 6 9 8 9 7 85 5 East Approach Totals West Approach Totals Includes Cars, Trucks, & Cyclists Grand Left Thru Right Total Total Peds East/West Total Approaches Hour Ending Includes Cars, Trucks, & Cyclists Grand Left Thru Right Total 7:: 7:: 8:: 57 46 4 467 47 8:: 9 5 95 9:: 59 54 564 46 9:: 4 786 4 86 :: 5 57 :: :: 9 4 5 8 :: 4 45 9 448 :: 5 96 5 46 844 :: 4 45 9 48 4:: 5 44 8 46 866 4:: 7 8 6 4 5:: 5:: 6:: 685 7 7 5 6:: 7 5 59 7:: 5 869 5 99 45 7:: 4 5 6 54 8:: 4 786 6 86 7 8:: 49 9 5 Total Peds Totals: 5 445 58 474 9448 5 447 8 474 Calculated Values for Traffic Crossing Major Street Hours Ending: Crossing Values: 8: 8 9: : : 7 4: 7 6: 7: 98 8: 56

MG8 ENG Morning Peak Diagram Specified Period From: 7:: To: 9:: One Hour Peak From: 7:: To: 8:: Municipality: Site #: Intersection: TFR File #: Count date: Region of Peel na Bovaird Drive & Caseley Street -Dec-9 Weather conditions: Cold with light snow in the morning Person(s) who counted: ZORAN ** Non-Signalized Intersection ** Major Road: Bovaird Drive runs W/E East Leg Total: East Entering: East Peds: Peds Cross: 4 48 4 Cyclists Trucks Cars Totals Cars Trucks Cyclists Totals 5 48 485 N 4 476 6 Bovaird Dr W E 45 4 Cyclists Trucks Cars Totals S Bovaird Dr 4 897 94 7 4 4 5 Cars Trucks Cyclists Totals 8 8 9 Caseley St 9 6 95 Peds Cross: Cars 7 Cars 6 6 Peds Cross: West Peds: 5 Trucks 5 Trucks 4 South Peds: West Entering: 957 Cyclists 9 Cyclists South Entering: 8 West Leg Total: 44 Totals Totals 9 9 South Leg Total: 9 Comments

MG8 ENG Mid-day Peak Diagram Specified Period From: :: To: 4:: One Hour Peak From: :: To: :: Municipality: Site #: Intersection: TFR File #: Count date: Region of Peel na Bovaird Drive & Caseley Street -Dec-9 Weather conditions: Cold with light snow in the morning Person(s) who counted: ZORAN ** Non-Signalized Intersection ** Major Road: Bovaird Drive runs W/E East Leg Total: East Entering: East Peds: Peds Cross: 875 45 5 Cyclists Trucks Cars Totals Cars Trucks Cyclists Totals 4 58 67 49 N 6 57 4 Bovaird Dr W E 64 57 4 Cyclists Trucks Cars Totals S Bovaird Dr 6 58 8 445 6 Cars Trucks Cyclists Totals 9 58 84 Caseley St 86 58 6 45 Peds Cross: Cars 5 Cars 5 5 Peds Cross: West Peds: 8 Trucks Trucks South Peds: West Entering: 45 Cyclists 4 Cyclists South Entering: West Leg Total: 88 Totals 9 Totals 7 5 South Leg Total: Comments

MG8 ENG Afternoon Peak Diagram Specified Period From: 5:: To: 8:: One Hour Peak From: 6:: To: 7:: Municipality: Site #: Intersection: TFR File #: Count date: Region of Peel na Bovaird Drive & Caseley Street -Dec-9 Weather conditions: Cold with light snow in the morning Person(s) who counted: ZORAN ** Non-Signalized Intersection ** Major Road: Bovaird Drive runs W/E East Leg Total: East Entering: East Peds: Peds Cross: 54 975 Cyclists Trucks Cars Totals Cars Trucks Cyclists Totals 6 9 97 N 9 6 97 4 5 Bovaird Dr W E 97 6 Cyclists Trucks Cars Totals S Bovaird Dr 9 498 59 6 6 Cars Trucks Cyclists Totals 9 54 Caseley St 498 9 59 Peds Cross: Cars Cars Peds Cross: West Peds: Trucks Trucks South Peds: West Entering: 545 Cyclists Cyclists South Entering: West Leg Total: 56 Totals Totals South Leg Total: Comments

MG8 ENG Total Count Diagram Municipality: Site #: Intersection: TFR File #: Count date: Region of Peel na Bovaird Drive & Caseley Street -Dec-9 Weather conditions: Cold with light snow in the morning Person(s) who counted: ZORAN ** Non-Signalized Intersection ** Major Road: Bovaird Drive runs W/E East Leg Total: East Entering: East Peds: Peds Cross: 947 47 Cyclists Trucks Cars Totals Cars Trucks Cyclists Totals 88 47 47 477 N 448 7 84 4669 5 7 4 Bovaird Dr W E 47 9 9 Cyclists Trucks Cars Totals S Bovaird Dr 44 6 4 476 4 7 4 Cars Trucks Cyclists Totals 58 69 4 Caseley St 4 64 49 474 Peds Cross: Cars 47 Cars 4 45 Peds Cross: West Peds: 6 Trucks 9 Trucks South Peds: 5 West Entering: 4749 Cyclists Cyclists 4 5 9 South Entering: 66 West Leg Total: 9456 Totals 77 Totals 8 8 South Leg Total: 4 Comments

MG8 ENG Traffic Count Summary Intersection: Bovaird Drive & Caseley Street Count Date: -Dec-9 Municipality: Region of Peel Hour Ending North Approach Totals Includes Cars, Trucks, & Cyclists Grand Left Thru Right Total Total Peds North/South Total Approaches Hour Ending South Approach Totals Includes Cars, Trucks, & Cyclists Grand Left Thru Right Total 7:: 7:: 8:: 4 8:: 4 9:: 7 9:: 9 8 7 :: :: :: :: :: 7 :: 4 7 4:: 6 4:: 5 6 5:: 5:: 6:: 6:: 7 7:: 7:: 8:: 7 8:: 5 7 Total Peds Totals: Hour Ending 66 8 8 66 5 East Approach Totals West Approach Totals Includes Cars, Trucks, & Cyclists Grand Left Thru Right Total Total Peds East/West Total Approaches Hour Ending Includes Cars, Trucks, & Cyclists Grand Left Thru Right Total 7:: 7:: 8:: 48 48 8:: 88 885 9:: 9 49 5 8 4 9:: 98 9 5 :: 8 8 96 :: 5 5 :: 99 99 675 :: 75 76 :: 94 96 88 :: 49 4 7 4:: 4 4 85 4:: 47 44 5:: 4 4 7 5:: 6:: 7 75 758 6:: 556 9 565 7:: 4 95 99 45 7:: 5 5 8:: 7 89 846 5 95 8:: 54 9 549 Total Peds Totals: 466 4694 94 467 4 476 6 Calculated Values for Traffic Crossing Major Street Hours Ending: Crossing Values: 8: 9: : : 4: 9 6: 7 7: 8: 9

Signal Timings Excellence in Transportation Planning

DATE: Jan., REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF PEEL Traffic Signal Timing Parameters Completed By: Approved By: IT Location: Bovaird @ Lake Louise/Worthington PEAK PERIOD (Mon. - Fri.) (Green + Amber + All Red) Vehicle Pedestrian (sec.) Phase Direction Minimum Minimum Amber All Red Split Split Split # (sec.) (sec.) (sec.) (sec.) AM OP PM WB P.P. LT 5 EB 5 4.6 8 6 7 4 NB 8 9 4.9 8 8 8 5 6 WB 5 4.6 8 6 8 7 8 SB 8 9 4.9 8 8 8 System Control Yes Local Control No Semi-Actuated Mode Yes PEAK CYCLE LENGTH (sec.) AM (6: - 9:) OP (9: - 5:) PM (5: - 9:) DATE: Jan., Completed By: Approved By: IT Location: Bovaird @ Go Station PEAK PERIOD (Mon. - Fri.) (Green + Amber + All Red) Vehicle Pedestrian (sec.) Phase Direction Minimum Minimum Amber All Red Split Split Split # (sec.) (sec.) (sec.) (sec.) AM OP PM/PM EB 6 4. 6 5 6/5 SB Prot. LT 8 4.7 / 4 NB 8 9 4.7 7 7 7/7 5 EB P.P. LT 5 8 / 6 WB 6 4. 4 5 6/5 7 8 SB 8 9 4.7 6 57 6/7 System Control Yes Local Control No PEAK CYCLE LENGTH Semi-Actuated Mode Yes AM (6: - 9:) OP (9: - 5:) PM (5: - 7:) PM (7: - 9:)

DATE: Jan., Completed By: Approved By: IT Location: Mississauga @ Bovaird PEAK PERIOD (Mon. - Fri.) (Green + Amber + All Red) Vehicle Pedestrian (sec.) Phase Direction Minimum Minimum Amber All Red Split Split Split # (sec.) (sec.) (sec.) (sec.) AM OP PM WB P.P. LT 5 5 EB 4.6 5 5 47 4 NB 4.6 5 48 58 5 6 WB 4.6 7 6 6 7 N.B. P.P. LT 5 8 SB 4.6 4 8 8 System Control Yes Local Control No Semi-Actuated Mode No PEAK CYCLE LENGTH (sec.) AM (6: - 9:) OP (9: - 5:) PM (5: - 9:) DATE: Jan. 8, Completed By: Approved By: IT Location: Bovaird @ Heritage PEAK PERIOD (Mon. - Fri.) (Green + Amber + All Red) Vehicle Pedestrian (sec.) Phase Direction Minimum Minimum Amber All Red Max. # (sec.) (sec.) (sec.) (sec.) All day/every day EB 6 6 5.4 6.4 4 NB 8 9 4. 6. 5 6 WB 6 6 5.4 6.4 7 8 SB 8 9 4. 6. System Control No Local Control No PEAK CYCLE LENGTH (sec.) Semi-Actuated Mode Yes All day/every day Local

Collision History Excellence in Transportation Planning

Loca%on ID Total year Year Total# Accident Rd Sur Cond Impact Type Accident Class Date Time Environmental Cond Light 76989S Bovaird Dr W @ Lake Louise Dr 8 5 557 Dry Sideswipe P.D.only 7 Jun 5 4 Clear 54458 Dry Rear end Non reportable 7 Jul 5 54 Clear 6 65655 Dry Turning movement P.D.only Aug 6 45 Clear Daylight 6464 Dry Rear end P.D.only Nov 6 Clear Dark 7 4 79645 Dry Turning movement P.D.only 6 Feb 7 5 Clear Dark 78477 Wet Turning movement P.D.only 9 Nov 7 65 Rain Dusk 7967 Loose snow Turning movement P.D.only 6 Nov 7 57 Snow Dusk 745 Dry Rear end P.D.only Dec 7 Clear Daylight 76989L Bovaird Dr W west of the Lake Louis Dr 4 7794L Bovaird Dr W @ Creditview Rd W 78L Bovaird Dr W west of the Go StaUon Entrance 8S Bovaird Dr W @ Mississauga Rd 8 78956L Bovaird Dr W West of the Mississauga Rd 4 6 659 Wet Sideswipe P.D.only 5 Mar 6 48 Rain Daylight 667558 Dry Rear end P.D.only 7 Apr 6 Clear Daylight 675 Dry Rear end P.D.only 8 Apr 6 8 Clear Daylight 7 7777 Packed snow Approaching P.D.only 4 Feb 7 849 Snow Daylight 6 6 646854 Dry Rear end Non fatal injury 6 Mar 6 68 Clear Daylight 6869 Dry Rear end P.D.only 7 Sep 6 55 Clear Dark 6898 Dry Rear end P.D.only May 6 7 Clear Daylight 6569 Dry Other P.D.only Aug 6 45 Clear Dark 5 8 57549 Dry Angle P.D.only 9 Apr 5 5 Clear Daylight 589 Dry Sideswipe P.D.only 5 May 5 8 Clear Daylight 5659 Dry Angle P.D.only 8 Aug 5 Clear Daylight 5688 Wet Turning movement P.D.only 9 Aug 5 65 Rain Dark 57669 Dry SMV other P.D.only 9 Sep 5 Clear Dark 59 Dry Rear end Non fatal injury 8 Nov 5 84 Clear Daylight 5475 Dry Rear end P.D.only Dec 5 Clear Daylight 5564 Wet Approaching P.D.only Dec 5 6 Clear Daylight 6 5 6799 Ice Rear end P.D.only Aug 5 9 Clear Daylight 6459 Wet Approaching P.D.only 4 Oct 5 6 Rain Dawn 6979 Dry Sideswipe P.D.only Oct 6 4 Clear Daylight 6974 Dry Angle P.D.only 8 Oct 6 5 Clear Daylight 69755S Dry Angle P.D.only 645 Clear Daylight 7 5 7854 Dry Turning movement P.D.only 6 Feb 7 4 Clear Daylight 786 Dry Angle P.D.only 5 Feb 7 54 Clear Daylight 784 Dry Rear end P.D.only 9 Feb 7 7 Clear Daylight 796 Wet Angle P.D.only Mar 7 854 Clear Daylight 7456 Dry Sideswipe P.D.only 8 Mar 7 5 Clear Daylight 74865 Ice Approaching Non fatal injury Mar 7 7 Freezing rain Daylight 7547 Dry Angle Non fatal injury Mar 7 65 Clear Daylight 768779 Dry Sideswipe P.D.only 8 Apr 7 5 Clear Daylight 77798S Dry Turning movement P.D.only May 7 448 Clear Daylight 78857 Wet Rear end P.D.only 6 May 7 54 Rain Daylight 78866 Wet Rear end P.D.only 6 May 7 65 Rain Daylight 7696S Dry Angle P.D.only Jun 7 Clear Daylight 774 Dry Rear end P.D.only Jun 7 8 Clear Daylight 7 Wet Rear end P.D.only 4 Jun 7 74 Rain Daylight 7488 Dry Sideswipe P.D.only Jul 7 4 Clear Daylight 744 Dry Angle Non fatal injury 4 Jul 7 Clear Daylight 7554 Dry Rear end P.D.only 5 Aug 7 8 Clear Daylight 757788 Dry Other P.D.only 6 Aug 7 97 Clear Daylight 766679 Dry Approaching P.D.only 7 Aug 7 6 Clear Dark 76788 Dry Angle P.D.only 9 Aug 7 456 Clear Daylight 757S Dry Rear end P.D.only Nov 7 8 Clear Dark 75569 Dry Angle P.D.only 6 Dec 7 Clear Daylight 74766 Ice Rear end P.D.only 4 Dec 7 7 Snow Daylight 744564 Wet Angle P.D.only Dec 7 8 Clear Daylight 748 Dry Approaching P.D.only 6 Dec 7 47 Clear Daylight 5 5569 Slush Sideswipe P.D.only 6 Jan 5 7 Snow Dark 54698 Dry Rear end P.D.only Jul 5 5 Clear Daylight 58849 Dry Rear end P.D.only 7 Sep 5 655 Clear Daylight 6 694 Dry Rear end P.D.only 4 May 6 9 Clear Daylight 9-55ABovaird Lake Louis to Heritage.xls

Loca%on ID Total year Year Total# Accident Rd Sur Cond Impact Type Accident Class Date Time Environmental Cond Light 74S Bovaird Dr W @ Heritage Rd 5 58675 Wet Sideswipe Non fatal injury 4 Sep 5 9 Rain Dark 54464S Dry Other P.D.only Dec 5 Clear Dark 6 6 74L Bovaird Dr W West of the Heritage Rd 4 Grand Total 75 6849S Dry Approaching P.D.only Jan 6 4 Clear Daylight 6945 Dry Angle Non fatal injury 7 Feb 6 55 Clear Daylight 688 Dry Approaching P.D.only 4 Mar 6 5 Clear Daylight 66556 Dry Approaching Non fatal injury Apr 6 64 Clear Daylight 68 Dry Angle P.D.only 9 Jul 6 59 Clear Daylight 699 Dry Rear end P.D.only Oct 6 Clear Daylight 7 5 7498 Wet Sideswipe P.D.only 9 Mar 7 6 Clear Daylight 7687 Dry Angle P.D.only Jun 7 49 Clear Daylight 765 Dry Turning movement P.D.only Jul 7 5 Clear Daylight 7469 Dry Approaching P.D.only 9 Oct 7 95 Strong Wind Dark 7854S Wet Approaching P.D.only 9 Nov 7 74 Rain Dark 5 5 Packed snow Angle P.D.only 6 Jan 5 4 Snow Dawn 5856 Dry Turning movement P.D.only May 5 5 Clear Daylight 7 74 Dry Rear end P.D.only 9 Jun 7 75 Clear Daylight 746 Dry Rear end P.D.only 9 Jun 7 74 Clear Daylight 9-55ABovaird Lake Louis to Heritage.xls

Appendix B Synchro Intersection Capacity Analysis Excellence in Transportation Planning

Existing Traffic Excellence in Transportation Planning

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis <Existing> AM Peak Hour : Lake Lousie Drive/Worthington Avenue & Bovaird Drive // Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 79 5 79 4 4 6 97 6 6 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 Total Lost time (s) 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.9 Lane Util. Factor..9..9..... Frpb, ped/bikes.....97..99..98 Flpb, ped/bikes........99. Frt.....85..9..87 Flt Protected.95..95...95..95. Satd. Flow (prot) 7 4875 78 49 45 778 64 76 576 Flt Permitted.6..5...7..7. Satd. Flow (perm) 654 4875 655 49 45 69 64 5 576 Peak-hour factor, PHF............ Adj. Flow (vph) 79 5 79 4 4 6 97 6 6 RTOR Reduction (vph) 5 8 Lane Group Flow (vph) 75 5 79 9 4 97 5 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 6 6 Heavy Vehicles (%) 4% 5% % % 4% 7% % 8% % % % % Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm Perm NA Perm NA Protected Phases 6 4 8 Permitted Phases 6 6 4 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 75.4 75.4 75.4 75.4 75.4 9.6 9.6 9.6 9.6 Effective Green, g (s) 75.4 75.4 75.4 75.4 75.4 9.6 9.6 9.6 9.6 Actuated g/c Ratio.64.64.64.64.64.5.5.5.5 Clearance Time (s) 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.9 Vehicle Extension (s) 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. Lane Grp Cap (vph) 46 47 8 9 7 4 94 v/s Ratio Prot c.5.5..7 v/s Ratio Perm.5.4..6 c. v/c Ratio.4.4.6...4.8.89.9 Uniform Delay, d 9. 9. 8. 9. 7.9 5.4 4. 4.9 6. Progression Factor......... Incremental Delay, d.4.....5. 5.9.9 Delay (s).6 9.4 8.4 9. 7.9 6.9 4. 68.8 6.8 Level of Service B A A A A D C E D Approach Delay (s) 9.6 9. 5.4 5.8 Approach LOS A A D D Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay.7 HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio.4 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 8.5 Sum of lost time (s).5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 9.5% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 5 c Critical Lane Group 9-55 Bovaird Class EA Synchro 8 Report ENTRA Consultants Page

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis <Existing> AM Peak Hour : Bovaird Drive & Ashby Field Road /4/ Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 88 44 7 67 6 8 67 9 5 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 Total Lost time (s). 6. 6. 6. 6. 6. 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 Lane Util. Factor..95...95....97. Frpb, ped/bikes...98.....99.. Flpb, ped/bikes.......... Frt...85...85..89..94 Flt Protected.95...95...95..95. Satd. Flow (prot) 58 68 57 699 6 597 75 64 46 698 Flt Permitted....4...74..95. Satd. Flow (perm) 544 68 57 68 6 597 65 64 46 698 Peak-hour factor, PHF............ Adj. Flow (vph) 88 44 7 67 6 8 67 9 5 RTOR Reduction (vph) 74 59 8 Lane Group Flow (vph) 88 9 44 7 9 6 6 9 7 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 8 8 Heavy Vehicles (%) % 6% % 5% 7% % % % % % % % Turn Type pm+pt Perm Perm Perm Perm Prot Protected Phases 5 6 4 8 Permitted Phases 6 6 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 59.5 59.5 59.5 5. 5. 5... 5.. Effective Green, g (s) 59.5 59.5 59.5 5. 5. 5... 5.. Actuated g/c Ratio.6.6.6.56.56.56...5.4 Clearance Time (s). 6. 6. 6. 6. 6. 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 Vehicle Extension (s) 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. Lane Grp Cap (vph) 75 946 9 86 89 6 94 8 49 v/s Ratio Prot. c.5.. c.. v/s Ratio Perm.4..7.6 c.4 v/c Ratio.6.9...8..7.9.6.4 Uniform Delay, d 7. 9. 6.8..9 9.9 8.8 7.9 4. 7.8 Progression Factor.......... Incremental Delay, d..6..8.6....9. Delay (s) 7. 9.5 6.9.9.5. 4.7 8.9 44. 7.8 Level of Service A A A B B B D D D C Approach Delay (s) 9.4. 4. 6.6 Approach LOS A B D D Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay.6 HCM Level of Service B HCM Volume to Capacity ratio.8 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 95.4 Sum of lost time (s) 9.6 Intersection Capacity Utilization 6.6% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 5 c Critical Lane Group 9-55 Bovaird Class EA Synchro 7 - Report ENTRA Consultants Page

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis <Existing> AM Peak Hour : Bovaird Drive & Mississauga Road /4/ Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 7 6 458 7 85 9 9 9 474 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 Total Lost time (s) 6.6 6.6 6.6. 6.6. 6.6 6.6 6.6 Lane Util. Factor......... Frt...85....9.. Flt Protected.95...95..95..95. Satd. Flow (prot) 5 789 56 65 79 684 584 68 798 Flt Permitted.5.......59. Satd. Flow (perm) 79 789 56 7 79 99 584 99 798 Peak-hour factor, PHF............ Adj. Flow (vph) 7 6 458 7 85 9 9 9 474 RTOR Reduction (vph) 4 6 Lane Group Flow (vph) 7 6 8 465 85 9 486 Heavy Vehicles (%) 8% 5% 4% 8% 9% 4% 6% % 5% % 4% 8% Turn Type Perm Perm pm+pt pm+pt Perm Protected Phases 6 7 4 8 Permitted Phases 6 4 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 6.5 6.5 4.9 4.9.4.4 Effective Green, g (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 6.5 6.5 4.9 4.9.4.4 Actuated g/c Ratio.7.7.7.54.54.5.5.8.8 Clearance Time (s) 6.6 6.6 6.6. 6.6. 6.6 6.6 6.6 Vehicle Extension (s) 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. Lane Grp Cap (vph) 9 656 56 4 9 9 56 79 56 v/s Ratio Prot.5 c.5.7 c..4 c.7 v/s Ratio Perm..5 c.4.9. v/c Ratio.6.95.4..5.6.9.7.96 Uniform Delay, d 4. 6.4 5. 5.6 7.5 9.8 8.8. 4. Progression Factor......... Incremental Delay, d.4 4..5 56.8....5.4 Delay (s) 4.7 6.4 5.6 9. 9.5 4.8 9.7.7 7.4 Level of Service C E C F B D C C E Approach Delay (s) 5.7 48.7. 7.8 Approach LOS D D C E Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 5.6 HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capacity ratio.94 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 8.6 Sum of lost time (s).6 Intersection Capacity Utilization 97.9% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 5 c Critical Lane Group 9-55 Bovaird Class EA Synchro 7 - Report ENTRA Consultants Page

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis <Existing> AM Peak Hour 4: Bovaird Drive & Heritage Road /4/ Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 4 89 5 58 456 6 8 7 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 Total Lost time (s) 7.4 7.4 7.4 7.4 7.4 7.4 6. 6. Lane Util. Factor........ Frt...85...85.9.98 Flt Protected.95...95...99.99 Satd. Flow (prot) 7 87 55 785 756 597 68 8 Flt Permitted.48......94.95 Satd. Flow (perm) 88 87 55 4 756 597 5 75 Peak-hour factor, PHF............ Adj. Flow (vph) 4 89 5 58 456 6 8 7 RTOR Reduction (vph) 7 9 Lane Group Flow (vph) 4 89 58 456 7 5 Heavy Vehicles (%) % 4% % % 7% % % % 5% % % % Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 6 4 8 Permitted Phases 6 6 4 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 58.7 58.7 58.7 58.7 58.7 58.7 4.4 4.4 Effective Green, g (s) 58.7 58.7 58.7 58.7 58.7 58.7 4.4 4.4 Actuated g/c Ratio.68.68.68.68.68.68.7.7 Clearance Time (s) 7.4 7.4 7.4 7.4 7.4 7.4 6. 6. Vehicle Extension (s) 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. Lane Grp Cap (vph) 596 5 78 89 8 54 88 v/s Ratio Prot c.49.6 v/s Ratio Perm.4..4.. c.9 v/c Ratio.6.7...8..7.5 Uniform Delay, d 4.7 8.9 4.6 5. 6. 4.5.5. Progression Factor........ Incremental Delay, d..9..7.9... Delay (s) 4.9.8 4.7 7. 7. 4.5.7 6. Level of Service A B A A A A C D Approach Delay (s). 7..7 6. Approach LOS B A C D Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay. HCM Level of Service B HCM Volume to Capacity ratio.69 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 86.7 Sum of lost time (s).6 Intersection Capacity Utilization 7.4% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 5 c Critical Lane Group 9-55 Bovaird Class EA Synchro 7 - Report ENTRA Consultants Page 4

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis <Existing> AM Peak Hour 5: Bovaird Drive & Caseley Street /4/ Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Volume (veh/h) 94 5 6 476 9 9 Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade % % % Peak Hour Factor...... Hourly flow rate (vph) 94 5 6 476 9 9 Pedestrians 5 4 Lane Width (m).5.5.5 Walking Speed (m/s)... Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (m) px, platoon unblocked vc, conflicting volume 958 444 954 vc, stage conf vol vc, stage conf vol vcu, unblocked vol 958 444 954 tc, single (s) 4. 6.6 6.4 tc, stage (s) tf (s).4.7.5 p queue free % 99 9 97 cm capacity (veh/h) 66 87 Direction, Lane # EB WB NB Volume Total 957 48 8 Volume Left 6 9 Volume Right 5 9 csh 7 66 78 Volume to Capacity.56.. Queue Length 95th (m)...5 Control Delay (s).. 7.4 Lane LOS A D Approach Delay (s).. 7.4 Approach LOS D Intersection Summary Average Delay.4 Intersection Capacity Utilization 6.7% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 5 9-55 Bovaird Class EA Synchro 7 - Report ENTRA Consultants Page 5

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis <Existing> Midday Peak Hour : Lake Lousie Drive/Worthington Avenue & Bovaird Drive // Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 9 5 8 58 66 48 58 48 9 5 7 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 Total Lost time (s) 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.9 Lane Util. Factor..9..9..... Frpb, ped/bikes.....97..99..99 Flpb, ped/bikes........99. Frt..99...85..9..9 Flt Protected.95..95...95..95. Satd. Flow (prot) 744 4476 7 458 466 74 645 654 49 Flt Permitted.45..4...66..69. Satd. Flow (perm) 87 4476 785 458 466 6 645 99 49 Peak-hour factor, PHF............ Adj. Flow (vph) 9 5 8 58 66 48 58 48 9 5 7 RTOR Reduction (vph) 5 5 69 Lane Group Flow (vph) 9 556 58 4 48 7 9 88 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 5 5 8 5 5 8 Heavy Vehicles (%) % 4% % % % 6% % 5% 6% 7% % 6% Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm Perm NA Perm NA Protected Phases 6 4 8 Permitted Phases 6 6 4 8 Actuated Green, G (s).5.5.5.5.5 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 Effective Green, g (s).5.5.5.5.5 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 Actuated g/c Ratio.5.5.5.5.5.7.7.7.7 Clearance Time (s) 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.9 Vehicle Extension (s) 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. Lane Grp Cap (vph) 4 85 4 8 748 6 445 5 8 v/s Ratio Prot c...4.6 v/s Ratio Perm..4..4 c.6 v/c Ratio..4.8..5.5.6.59. Uniform Delay, d 8. 8.4 7.7 8. 7.6 7. 7. 9.5 7.5 Progression Factor......... Incremental Delay, d...4...4.4 4..7 Delay (s) 9.4 8.7 8. 8.6 7.7 7.5 7.5.7 8. Level of Service A A A A A B B C B Approach Delay (s) 8.8 8.4 7.5. Approach LOS A A B C Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay.9 HCM Level of Service B HCM Volume to Capacity ratio.6 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 6.7 Sum of lost time (s).5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 88.% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 5 c Critical Lane Group 9-55 Bovaird Class EA Synchro 8 Report ENTRA Consultants Page

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis <Existing> Midday Peak Hour : Bovaird Drive & Ashby Field Road /4/ Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 8 469 7 6 486 9 8 5 7 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 Total Lost time (s) 6. 6. 6. 6. 6. 6. 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 Lane Util. Factor..95...95....97. Frpb, ped/bikes...98...98..98..98 Flpb, ped/bikes.......... Frt...85...85..85..88 Flt Protected.95...95...95..95. Satd. Flow (prot) 47 45 78 6 56 68 5 46 4 Flt Permitted.48...48...75..95. Satd. Flow (perm) 7 45 96 6 56 7 5 46 4 Peak-hour factor, PHF............ Adj. Flow (vph) 8 469 7 6 486 9 8 5 7 RTOR Reduction (vph) 7 47 6 Lane Group Flow (vph) 8 469 7 6 486 8 6 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 7 Heavy Vehicles (%) 5% % 9% % % % % % 4% % % 9% Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm Prot Protected Phases 6 4 8 Permitted Phases 6 6 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 54.7 54.7 54.7 54.7 54.7 54.7 7.6 7.6. 7.5 Effective Green, g (s) 54.7 54.7 54.7 54.7 54.7 54.7 7.6 7.6. 7.5 Actuated g/c Ratio.64.64.64.64.64.64.9.9.4. Clearance Time (s) 6. 6. 6. 6. 6. 6. 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 Vehicle Extension (s) 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. Lane Grp Cap (vph) 458 86 84 58 67 5 4 5 74 v/s Ratio Prot.4 c.5. c.. v/s Ratio Perm...7. c. v/c Ratio.....4..5.4.7. Uniform Delay, d 5.5 6. 5.5 5.8 6.4 5.5 6. 5.4 9.7 6.9 Progression Factor.......... Incremental Delay, d....4...... Delay (s) 5.6 6.6 5.5 6. 6.7 5.5 8.4 5.7 4. 7. Level of Service A A A A A A D D D C Approach Delay (s) 6.5 6.6 6.6 6.9 Approach LOS A A D D Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 9.4 HCM Level of Service A HCM Volume to Capacity ratio. Actuated Cycle Length (s) 85. Sum of lost time (s) 9.6 Intersection Capacity Utilization 6.% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 5 c Critical Lane Group 9-55 Bovaird Class EA Synchro 7 - Report ENTRA Consultants Page

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis <Existing> Midday Peak Hour : Bovaird Drive & Mississauga Road /4/ Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 8 8 74 48 8 8 7 8 4 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 Total Lost time (s) 6.6 6.6 6.6. 6.6. 6.6 6.6 6.6 Lane Util. Factor......... Frt...85..99..9..98 Flt Protected.95...95..95..95. Satd. Flow (prot) 84 648 77 59 647 46 5 6 588 Flt Permitted.55...44..6..6. Satd. Flow (perm) 746 648 77 75 647 978 5 75 588 Peak-hour factor, PHF............ Adj. Flow (vph) 8 8 74 48 8 8 7 8 4 RTOR Reduction (vph) 4 6 6 Lane Group Flow (vph) 8 8 48 46 8 45 89 Heavy Vehicles (%) 9% 4% 6% 6% % 5% % % % % 6% 4% Turn Type Perm Perm pm+pt pm+pt Perm Protected Phases 6 7 4 8 Permitted Phases 6 4 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 45.5 45.5 45.5 55.5 55.5 9.9 9.9.4.4 Effective Green, g (s) 45.5 45.5 45.5 55.5 55.5 9.9 9.9.4.4 Actuated g/c Ratio.4.4.4.5.5.7.7.9.9 Clearance Time (s) 6.6 6.6 6.6. 6.6. 6.6 6.6 6.6 Vehicle Extension (s) 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. Lane Grp Cap (vph) 69 577 49 84 84 556 459 v/s Ratio Prot c.. c.. c..6 v/s Ratio Perm...6.7. v/c Ratio.6.48.5.5.4..6.6.9 Uniform Delay, d 8.8.9 8.8 5. 6.4. 4. 8. 9. Progression Factor......... Incremental Delay, d.4....5.6.5.4.9 Delay (s) 9. 5. 8.9 6. 7.9.7 4.6 8.4. Level of Service B C B B B C C C C Approach Delay (s).9 7.4 4. 9.7 Approach LOS C B C C Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay. HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio.4 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 8.6 Sum of lost time (s) 9.8 Intersection Capacity Utilization 68.% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 5 c Critical Lane Group 9-55 Bovaird Class EA Synchro 7 - Report ENTRA Consultants Page

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis <Existing> Midday Peak Hour 4: Bovaird Drive & Heritage Road /4/ Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 5 49 8 7 49 9 6 6 8 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 Total Lost time (s) 7.4 7.4 7.4 7.4 7.4 7.4 6. 6. Lane Util. Factor........ Frpb, ped/bikes........97 Flpb, ped/bikes........ Frt...85...85.94.9 Flt Protected.95...95...98.99 Satd. Flow (prot) 785 678 597 785 648 49 7 55 Flt Permitted.5...5.... Satd. Flow (perm) 98 678 597 97 648 49 76 567 Peak-hour factor, PHF............ Adj. Flow (vph) 5 49 8 7 49 9 6 6 8 RTOR Reduction (vph) 6 8 Lane Group Flow (vph) 5 49 6 7 49 8 7 6 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 7 Heavy Vehicles (%) % % % % 4% % % % % % % % Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 6 4 8 Permitted Phases 6 6 4 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 7. 7. 7. 7. 7. 7..7.7 Effective Green, g (s) 7. 7. 7. 7. 7. 7..7.7 Actuated g/c Ratio.8.8.8.8.8.8.. Clearance Time (s) 7.4 7.4 7.4 7.4 7.4 7.4 6. 6. Vehicle Extension (s) 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. Lane Grp Cap (vph) 85 77 798 5 8 5 v/s Ratio Prot c.5.5 v/s Ratio Perm.... c.. v/c Ratio........ Uniform Delay, d.4.8.4.4.8.4 4. 4. Progression Factor........ Incremental Delay, d..6...6. 5.9 6.5 Delay (s).4.4.4.4.4.4 47. 47.7 Level of Service A A A A A A D D Approach Delay (s).. 47. 47.7 Approach LOS A A D D Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay.7 HCM Level of Service A HCM Volume to Capacity ratio. Actuated Cycle Length (s) 85.4 Sum of lost time (s).6 Intersection Capacity Utilization 5.8% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 5 c Critical Lane Group 9-55 Bovaird Class EA Synchro 7 - Report ENTRA Consultants Page 4

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis <Existing> Midday Peak Hour 5: Bovaird Drive & Caseley Street /4/ Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Volume (veh/h) 445 6 4 7 5 Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade % % % Peak Hour Factor...... Hourly flow rate (vph) 445 6 4 7 5 Pedestrians 8 5 Lane Width (m).5.5 Walking Speed (m/s).. Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (m) px, platoon unblocked vc, conflicting volume 45 894 45 vc, stage conf vol vc, stage conf vol vcu, unblocked vol 45 894 45 tc, single (s) 4. 6.5 6. tc, stage (s) tf (s)..6. p queue free % 98 99 cm capacity (veh/h) 9 68 Direction, Lane # EB WB NB Volume Total 45 45 Volume Left 7 Volume Right 6 5 csh 7 7 Volume to Capacity.7.. Queue Length 95th (m)...8 Control Delay (s).. 5. Lane LOS A B Approach Delay (s).. 5. Approach LOS B Intersection Summary Average Delay. Intersection Capacity Utilization 6.% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 5 9-55 Bovaird Class EA Synchro 7 - Report ENTRA Consultants Page 5

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis <Existing> PM Peak Hour : Lake Lousie Drive/Worthington Avenue & Bovaird Drive // Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 46 55 5 9 9 6 9 57 4 5 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 Total Lost time (s) 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.9 Lane Util. Factor..9..9..... Frpb, ped/bikes.....97..99..96 Flpb, ped/bikes......98..98. Frt..99...85..96..88 Flt Protected.95..95...95..95. Satd. Flow (prot) 747 47 785 489 99 74 786 7 Flt Permitted.6..4...5..7. Satd. Flow (perm) 474 47 79 489 99 95 786 9 Peak-hour factor, PHF............ Adj. Flow (vph) 46 55 5 9 9 6 9 57 4 5 RTOR Reduction (vph) 4 6 9 Lane Group Flow (vph) 46 58 5 9 6 57 9 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 7 7 Heavy Vehicles (%) % 8% % % 6% % % % % % % 8% Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm Perm NA Perm NA Protected Phases 6 4 8 Permitted Phases 6 6 4 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 75.6 75.6 75.6 75.6 75.6.... Effective Green, g (s) 75.6 75.6 75.6 75.6 75.6.... Actuated g/c Ratio.69.69.69.69.69.8.8.8.8 Clearance Time (s) 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.9 Vehicle Extension (s) 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. Lane Grp Cap (vph) 8 67 547 47 968 76 4 6 v/s Ratio Prot....7 v/s Ratio Perm c.5.7.. c. v/c Ratio.75.8...4..9.65.4 Uniform Delay, d.8 5.9 5.6 6.6 5.7 6.5 7. 4. 9. Progression Factor......... Incremental Delay, d 4.6..4.... 8..4 Delay (s) 5.4 6. 5.9 6.8 6. 6.7 7. 49. 4.7 Level of Service C A A A A D D D D Approach Delay (s).8 6.7 7. 45. Approach LOS B A D D Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 4. HCM Level of Service B HCM Volume to Capacity ratio.7 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 9. Sum of lost time (s).5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 79.% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 5 c Critical Lane Group Bovaird Class EA Synchro 8 Report ENTRA Consultants Page

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis <Existing> PM Peak Hour : Bovaird Drive & Ashby Field Road /4/ Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 6 765 66 9 855 7 9 8 77 57 46 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 Total Lost time (s) 6. 6. 6. 6. 6. 6. 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 Lane Util. Factor..95...95....97. Frpb, ped/bikes...98.....98..99 Flpb, ped/bikes.......... Frt...85...85..87..9 Flt Protected.95...95...95..95. Satd. Flow (prot) 785 4 5 784 4 597 69 64 46 74 Flt Permitted.9......69..95. Satd. Flow (perm) 54 4 5 6 4 597 64 46 74 Peak-hour factor, PHF............ Adj. Flow (vph) 6 765 66 9 855 7 9 8 77 57 46 RTOR Reduction (vph) 8 6 74 Lane Group Flow (vph) 6 765 8 9 855 9 77 7 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 5 5 Heavy Vehicles (%) % 5% % % 4% % 5% % % % % % Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm Prot Protected Phases 6 4 8 Permitted Phases 6 6 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 55. 55. 55. 55. 55. 55. 8.7 8.7. 7.5 Effective Green, g (s) 55. 55. 55. 55. 55. 55. 8.7 8.7. 7.5 Actuated g/c Ratio.58.58.58.58.58.58.9.9..9 Clearance Time (s) 6. 6. 6. 6. 6. 6. 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 Vehicle Extension (s) 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. Lane Grp Cap (vph) 96 88 5 979 9 46 49 5 v/s Ratio Prot. c.5. c.5.4 v/s Ratio Perm...5. c. v/c Ratio..9.4.6.4..5.4.4.4 Uniform Delay, d 8.7. 8.8..4 8.7 4.7 9.9 8. 5. Progression Factor.......... Incremental Delay, d..6..8.7..9.9.. Delay (s) 8.8.6 8.9.9. 8.7 44.6 4.8 9.6 5.5 Level of Service A B A B B A D D D C Approach Delay (s).4.9 4.9 4.4 Approach LOS B B D C Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 6. HCM Level of Service B HCM Volume to Capacity ratio.4 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 95.4 Sum of lost time (s) 9.6 Intersection Capacity Utilization 6.% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 5 c Critical Lane Group Bovaird Class EA Synchro 7 - Report ENTRA Consultants Page

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis <Existing> PM Peak Hour : Bovaird Drive & Mississauga Road /4/ Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 7 45 9 684 48 4 9 6 7 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 Total Lost time (s) 6.6 6.6 6.6. 6.6. 6.6 6.6 6.6 Lane Util. Factor......... Frt...85..99..9..99 Flt Protected.95...95..95..95. Satd. Flow (prot) 55 789 45 684 89 68 697 785 749 Flt Permitted.7...4..5... Satd. Flow (perm) 78 789 45 4 89 99 697 749 Peak-hour factor, PHF............ Adj. Flow (vph) 7 45 9 684 48 4 9 6 7 RTOR Reduction (vph) 6 Lane Group Flow (vph) 7 45 7 749 77 Heavy Vehicles (%) 5% 5% % 6% % 6% 9% % 4% % 4% 4% Turn Type Perm Perm pm+pt pm+pt Perm Protected Phases 6 7 4 8 Permitted Phases 6 4 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 4.4 4.4 4.4 55.4 55.4 5.4 5.4.6.6 Effective Green, g (s) 4.4 4.4 4.4 55.4 55.4 5.4 5.4.6.6 Actuated g/c Ratio.4.4.4.46.46.4.4.7.7 Clearance Time (s) 6.6 6.6 6.6. 6.6. 6.6 6.6 6.6 Vehicle Extension (s) 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. Lane Grp Cap (vph) 94 6 489 84 488 77 6 475 v/s Ratio Prot.5.7 c.4.6 c.44. v/s Ratio Perm...6..9 v/c Ratio.9.75.6.7.87.45...7 Uniform Delay, d 9. 5. 7.. 9..9 4. 5. 5.4 Progression Factor......... Incremental Delay, d 7.5 8.. 9.6.8.4 4..7. Delay (s) 6.8 4.5 7..8 4.9 4. 75.5 48.7 7.6 Level of Service D D C C D C E D D Approach Delay (s) 4.6 8.9 64. 8.8 Approach LOS D D E D Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 48.4 HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capacity ratio.95 Actuated Cycle Length (s). Sum of lost time (s). Intersection Capacity Utilization.% ICU Level of Service H Analysis Period (min) 5 c Critical Lane Group Bovaird Class EA Synchro 7 - Report ENTRA Consultants Page

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis <Existing> PM Peak Hour 4: Bovaird Drive & Heritage Road /4/ Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 5 59 8 98 46 65 4 9 7 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 Total Lost time (s) 7.4 7.4 7.4 7.4 7.4 7.4 6. 6. Lane Util. Factor........ Frpb, ped/bikes........98 Flpb, ped/bikes........ Frt...85...85.96.95 Flt Protected.95...95...99.99 Satd. Flow (prot) 785 77 597 785 84 597 786 77 Flt Permitted.9...44...9.94 Satd. Flow (perm) 64 77 597 84 84 597 668 648 Peak-hour factor, PHF............ Adj. Flow (vph) 5 59 8 98 46 65 4 9 7 RTOR Reduction (vph) 8 6 Lane Group Flow (vph) 5 59 7 98 4 4 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 7 Heavy Vehicles (%) % 6% % % % % % % % % % % Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 6 4 8 Permitted Phases 6 6 4 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 57. 57. 57. 57. 57. 57. 6.6 6.6 Effective Green, g (s) 57. 57. 57. 57. 57. 57. 6.6 6.6 Actuated g/c Ratio.65.65.65.65.65.65.9.9 Clearance Time (s) 7.4 7.4 7.4 7.4 7.4 7.4 6. 6. Vehicle Extension (s) 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. Lane Grp Cap (vph) 8 59 44 59 4 44 8 4 v/s Ratio Prot.9 c.49 v/s Ratio Perm.7... c.. v/c Ratio..44..4.75..64.5 Uniform Delay, d 5.6 7. 5. 5.4. 5..6 8.8 Progression Factor........ Incremental Delay, d.9... 4.4. 6.. Delay (s) 6.5 8.5 5. 5.5 4.7 5. 8.5 9. Level of Service A A A A B A D C Approach Delay (s) 8.4 4.4 8.5 9. Approach LOS A B D C Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 5.8 HCM Level of Service B HCM Volume to Capacity ratio.7 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 87. Sum of lost time (s).6 Intersection Capacity Utilization 75.9% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 5 c Critical Lane Group Bovaird Class EA Synchro 7 - Report ENTRA Consultants Page 4

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis <Existing> PM Peak Hour 5: Bovaird Drive & Caseley Street /4/ Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Volume (veh/h) 59 6 5 97 Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade % % % Peak Hour Factor...... Hourly flow rate (vph) 59 6 5 97 Pedestrians Lane Width (m).5.5.5 Walking Speed (m/s)... Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (m) px, platoon unblocked vc, conflicting volume 557 55 557 vc, stage conf vol vc, stage conf vol vcu, unblocked vol 557 55 557 tc, single (s) 4. 6.4 6. tc, stage (s) tf (s)..5. p queue free % 99 cm capacity (veh/h) 4 7 57 Direction, Lane # EB WB NB Volume Total 545 975 Volume Left 5 Volume Right 6 csh 7 4 7 Volume to Capacity... Queue Length 95th (m)... Control Delay (s)...5 Lane LOS A D Approach Delay (s)...5 Approach LOS D Intersection Summary Average Delay. Intersection Capacity Utilization 66.% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 5 Bovaird Class EA Synchro 7 - Report ENTRA Consultants Page 5

Do Nothing Scenario Excellence in Transportation Planning

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis <Do Nothing> AM Peak Hour : Lake Lousie Drive/Worthington Avenue & Bovaird Drive // Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 7 6 7 9 77 5 45 68 47 44 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 Total Lost time (s) 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.9 Lane Util. Factor..9..9..... Frpb, ped/bikes.....97..98..98 Flpb, ped/bikes........99. Frt.....85..9..86 Flt Protected.95..95...95..95. Satd. Flow (prot) 7 488 78 49 45 78 6 764 56 Flt Permitted.8..7...9..68. Satd. Flow (perm) 5 488 49 45 5 6 7 56 Peak-hour factor, PHF............ Adj. Flow (vph) 7 6 7 9 77 5 45 68 47 44 RTOR Reduction (vph) 7 87 Lane Group Flow (vph) 7 9 6 5 8 47 6 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 6 6 Heavy Vehicles (%) 4% 5% % % 4% 7% % 8% % % % % Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm Perm NA Perm NA Protected Phases 6 4 8 Permitted Phases 6 6 4 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 67.7 67.7 67.7 67.7 67.7.8.8.8.8 Effective Green, g (s) 67.7 67.7 67.7 67.7 67.7.8.8.8.8 Actuated g/c Ratio.6.6.6.6.6.8.8.8.8 Clearance Time (s) 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.9 Vehicle Extension (s) 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. Lane Grp Cap (vph) 95 87 955 869 99 459 57 49 v/s Ratio Prot.7.9.5 c. v/s Ratio Perm c.4.4.7.5.9 v/c Ratio.57.45.6...5.7.69.8 Uniform Delay, d.8.5 9.4. 9.8 4..7 6. 7.9 Progression Factor......... Incremental Delay, d 7.7.5.7.. 9..4 7.. Delay (s).4...5. 4.5. 4.4 5.9 Level of Service C B B B B D C D D Approach Delay (s).9. 5. 48. Approach LOS B B C D Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay.9 HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio.65 Actuated Cycle Length (s). Sum of lost time (s).5 Intersection Capacity Utilization.5% ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period (min) 5 c Critical Lane Group 9-55 Bovaird Class EA Synchro 8 Report ENTRA Consultants Page

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis <Do Nothing> AM Peak Hour : Ashby Field Road & Bovaird Drive /4/ Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 5 4 44 9 84 99 59 64 5 6 5 4 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 Total Lost time (s). 6. 6. 6. 6. 6. 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 Lane Util. Factor..95...95....97. Frpb, ped/bikes...98.....99.. Flpb, ped/bikes.......... Frt...85...85..89..9 Flt Protected.95...95...95..95. Satd. Flow (prot) 58 68 56 7 6 597 75 6 46 66 Flt Permitted.7......74..95. Satd. Flow (perm) 68 56 6 597 6 6 46 66 Peak-hour factor, PHF............ Adj. Flow (vph) 5 4 44 9 84 99 59 64 5 6 5 4 RTOR Reduction (vph) 8 84 5 Lane Group Flow (vph) 5 4 6 9 84 5 59 65 6 9 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 8 8 Heavy Vehicles (%) % 6% % 5% 7% % % % % % % % Turn Type pm+pt NA Perm Perm NA Perm Perm NA Prot NA Protected Phases 5 6 4 8 Permitted Phases 6 6 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 64.8 64.8 64.8 55.7 55.7 55.7 9.9 9.9 6..7 Effective Green, g (s) 64.8 64.8 64.8 55.7 55.7 55.7 9.9 9.9 6..7 Actuated g/c Ratio.59.59.59.5.5.5.8.8.6. Clearance Time (s). 6. 6. 6. 6. 6. 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 Vehicle Extension (s) 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. Lane Grp Cap (vph) 47 977 89 8 68 86 45 94 9 49 v/s Ratio Prot. c.4 c.55. c.. v/s Ratio Perm.9..9.7 c. v/c Ratio.5.7..77.9.4.65.56..4 Uniform Delay, d.7 6. 9.6. 7.4 4.6 4. 4. 5. 7.7 Progression Factor.......... Incremental Delay, d... 7.6 5..4 7.9 4... Delay (s) 6.8 8.6 9.6 59.8 79.7 5. 49.9 45. 5. 7.7 Level of Service C B A E E B D D D C Approach Delay (s) 8.6 7.8 47. 44.4 Approach LOS B E D D Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 49.8 HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capacity ratio.95 Actuated Cycle Length (s).4 Sum of lost time (s) 5.8 Intersection Capacity Utilization 95.7% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 5 c Critical Lane Group 9-55 Bovaird Class EA Synchro 8 Report ENTRA Consultants Page

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis <Do Nothing> AM Peak Hour : Mississauga Road & Bovaird Drive /4/ Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 74 57 65 9 8 8 48 86 7 7 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 Total Lost time (s) 6.6 6.6 6.6. 6.6. 6.6 6.6 6.6 Lane Util. Factor......... Frt...85..98..96..99 Flt Protected.95...95..95..95. Satd. Flow (prot) 5 789 56 65 688 684 658 68 777 Flt Permitted.9...8..... Satd. Flow (perm) 4 789 56 44 688 7 658 76 777 Peak-hour factor, PHF............ Adj. Flow (vph) 74 57 65 9 8 8 48 86 7 7 RTOR Reduction (vph) 9 Lane Group Flow (vph) 55 57 8 489 86 797 Heavy Vehicles (%) 8% 5% 4% 8% 9% 4% 6% % 5% % 4% 8% Turn Type Perm NA Perm pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Perm NA Protected Phases 6 7 4 8 Permitted Phases 6 4 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 45.4 45.4 45.4 65.4 65.4 5.4 5.4 8.4 8.4 Effective Green, g (s) 45.4 45.4 45.4 65.4 65.4 5.4 5.4 8.4 8.4 Actuated g/c Ratio.5.5.5.5.5.4.4.. Clearance Time (s) 6.6 6.6 6.6. 6.6. 6.6 6.6 6.6 Vehicle Extension (s) 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. Lane Grp Cap (vph) 49 65 56 7 849 84 656 5 55 v/s Ratio Prot.69 c.8.77. c.9.45 v/s Ratio Perm c.8.7.79.4.49 v/c Ratio..97.48..5.9.7.65.5 Uniform Delay, d 4. 4.. 4.6. 4.6 9. 45.8 45.8 Progression Factor......... Incremental Delay, d 646.7 44.. 55.7 45. 66. 576.4 64.8 4.9 Delay (s) 689. 484.4 6. 557. 77.6.9 65.7 4.6 88.7 Level of Service F F D F F F F F F Approach Delay (s) 4. 6.9 558.9.6 Approach LOS F F F F Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 49. HCM Level of Service F HCM Volume to Capacity ratio.7 Actuated Cycle Length (s). Sum of lost time (s) 6. Intersection Capacity Utilization 8.7% ICU Level of Service H Analysis Period (min) 5 c Critical Lane Group 9-55 Bovaird Class EA Synchro 8 Report ENTRA Consultants Page

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis <Do Nothing> AM Peak Hour 4: Heritage Road & Bovaird Drive /4/ Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 5 95 68 96 58 66 4 48 8 6 6 76 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 Total Lost time (s) 7.4 7.4 7.4 7.4 7.4 7.4 6. 6. Lane Util. Factor........ Frt...85...85.98.96 Flt Protected.95...95...99. Satd. Flow (prot) 7 87 55 785 756 597 66 786 Flt Permitted.5...5...86.97 Satd. Flow (perm) 88 87 55 97 756 597 44 79 Peak-hour factor, PHF............ Adj. Flow (vph) 5 95 68 96 58 66 4 48 8 6 6 76 RTOR Reduction (vph) 5 Lane Group Flow (vph) 5 95 65 96 58 6 95 4 Heavy Vehicles (%) % 4% % % 7% % % % 5% % % % Turn Type Perm NA Perm Perm NA Perm Perm NA Perm NA Protected Phases 6 4 8 Permitted Phases 6 6 4 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 8.8 8.8 8.8 8.8 8.8 8.8.4.4 Effective Green, g (s) 8.8 8.8 8.8 8.8 8.8 8.8.4.4 Actuated g/c Ratio.69.69.69.69.69.69.. Clearance Time (s) 7.4 7.4 7.4 7.4 7.4 7.4 6. 6. Vehicle Extension (s) 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. Lane Grp Cap (vph) 6 49 7 67 4 4 8 4 v/s Ratio Prot.66.88 v/s Ratio Perm c..4.99.4.4 c.4 v/c Ratio.89.96.6.4.7.6.69.7 Uniform Delay, d 8.5 6.9 6. 8.5 8.5 5.9 44.8 45. Progression Factor........ Incremental Delay, d 45.6 7.. 6. 6.8. 9. 8.5 Delay (s) 47..9 6. 79.6 45. 6. 5.8 5.5 Level of Service F C A F F A D D Approach Delay (s) 69. 47.4 5.8 5.5 Approach LOS E F D D Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 4.8 HCM Level of Service F HCM Volume to Capacity ratio.6 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 9.8 Sum of lost time (s).6 Intersection Capacity Utilization 4.% ICU Level of Service H Analysis Period (min) 5 c Critical Lane Group 9-55 Bovaird Class EA Synchro 8 Report ENTRA Consultants Page 4

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis <Do Nothing> AM Peak Hour 5: Caseley Street & Bovaird Drive /4/ Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Volume (veh/h) 5 89 4 Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade % % % Peak Hour Factor...... Hourly flow rate (vph) 5 89 4 Pedestrians 5 4 Lane Width (m).5.5.5 Walking Speed (m/s)... Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (m) px, platoon unblocked vc, conflicting volume 7 7 vc, stage conf vol vc, stage conf vol vcu, unblocked vol 7 7 tc, single (s) 4. 6.6 6.4 tc, stage (s) tf (s).4.7.5 p queue free % 99 cm capacity (veh/h) 7 75 68 Direction, Lane # EB WB NB Volume Total 6 89 6 Volume Left 4 Volume Right csh 7 7 44 Volume to Capacity.8.. Queue Length 95th (m)... Control Delay (s)... Lane LOS B Approach Delay (s)... Approach LOS B Intersection Summary Average Delay. Intersection Capacity Utilization.7% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 5 9-55 Bovaird Class EA Synchro 8 Report ENTRA Consultants Page 5

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis <Do Nothing> PM Peak Hour : Lake Lousie Drive/Worthington Avenue & Bovaird Drive // Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 44 9 5 68 6 47 7 77 45 7 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 Total Lost time (s) 4. 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.9 6.9 4. 6.9 Lane Util. Factor..9..9..... Frpb, ped/bikes.....97..99..97 Flpb, ped/bikes......98... Frt..99...85..96..88 Flt Protected.95..95...95..95. Satd. Flow (prot) 75 47 785 489 4 749 79 7 8 Flt Permitted...8...7..95. Satd. Flow (perm) 47 55 489 4 5 79 7 8 Peak-hour factor, PHF............ Adj. Flow (vph) 44 9 5 68 6 47 7 77 45 7 RTOR Reduction (vph) 4 6 Lane Group Flow (vph) 44 978 68 6 87 7 4 77 86 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 7 7 Heavy Vehicles (%) % 8% % % 6% % % % % % % 8% Turn Type pm+pt NA Perm NA Perm Perm NA Prot NA Protected Phases 5 6 4 8 Permitted Phases 6 6 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 5. 5..8.8.8 5.6 5.6..7 Effective Green, g (s) 5. 5..8.8.8 5.6 5.6..7 Actuated g/c Ratio.6.6.5.5.5.6.6..4 Clearance Time (s) 4. 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.9 6.9 4. 6.9 Vehicle Extension (s). 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5.. 5. Lane Grp Cap (vph) 45 87 85 79 495 84 5 9 v/s Ratio Prot c.9..7. c. c.7 v/s Ratio Perm c.7..6. v/c Ratio.9.4.7.77.8.8.9.8.9 Uniform Delay, d. 8.5. 5. 9.5 8.4 8.9 7. 7. Progression Factor......... Incremental Delay, d 4.. 5.5.4.8.9. 8.5. Delay (s) 47. 8.8 6.5 8.5. 9. 4.9 55.4 8.4 Level of Service D A C C C D D E C Approach Delay (s). 7. 4.5 4.6 Approach LOS C C D D Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 6. HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio.74 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 87. Sum of lost time (s) 8. Intersection Capacity Utilization 84.% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 5 c Critical Lane Group Bovaird Class EA Synchro 8 Report ENTRA Consultants Page

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis <Do Nothing> PM Peak Hour : Ashby Field Road & Bovaird Drive /4/ Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 4 84 59 5 4 6 44 5 9 99 64 5 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 Total Lost time (s) 6. 6. 6. 6. 6. 6. 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 Lane Util. Factor..95...95....97. Frpb, ped/bikes...98.....98..99 Flpb, ped/bikes.......... Frt...85...85..87..9 Flt Protected.95...95...95..95. Satd. Flow (prot) 785 4 5 785 4 597 69 64 46 79 Flt Permitted....6...68..95. Satd. Flow (perm) 5 4 5 8 4 597 5 64 46 79 Peak-hour factor, PHF............ Adj. Flow (vph) 4 84 59 5 4 6 44 5 9 99 64 5 RTOR Reduction (vph) 5 4 9 Lane Group Flow (vph) 4 84 6 5 4 8 44 97 99 95 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 5 5 Heavy Vehicles (%) % 5% % % 4% % 5% % % % % % Turn Type Perm NA Perm Perm NA Perm Perm NA Prot NA Protected Phases 6 4 8 Permitted Phases 6 6 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5.5.5 8. 8. Effective Green, g (s) 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5.5.5 8. 8. Actuated g/c Ratio.6.6.6.6.6.6...8.7 Clearance Time (s) 6. 6. 6. 6. 6. 6. 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 Vehicle Extension (s) 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. Lane Grp Cap (vph) 7 64 99 7 84 969 57 7 65 469 v/s Ratio Prot.54.4 c.6 c.6.5 v/s Ratio Perm.6.7 c.9..4 v/c Ratio..89...68.4.8.47.75. Uniform Delay, d 8.6 7.6 8.7.5.8 8. 4. 4. 47. 9.5 Progression Factor.......... Incremental Delay, d.5 6.4. 549.7.8...5.4.4 Delay (s). 4. 8.9 57. 5.6 8. 4. 45.7 6.7. Level of Service B C A F B A D D E C Approach Delay (s).7 67. 45. 49.4 Approach LOS C E D D Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 4. HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capacity ratio.74 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 4.6 Sum of lost time (s) 9.6 Intersection Capacity Utilization 9.% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 5 c Critical Lane Group Bovaird Class EA Synchro 8 Report ENTRA Consultants Page

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis <Do Nothing> PM Peak Hour : Mississauga Road & Bovaird Drive /4/ Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 7 65 8 48 86 74 7 57 9 8 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 Total Lost time (s) 6.6 6.6 6.6. 6.6. 6.6 6.6 6.6 Lane Util. Factor......... Frt...85..99..9..99 Flt Protected.95...95..95..95. Satd. Flow (prot) 55 789 45 684 89 68 697 785 749 Flt Permitted....9..8..9. Satd. Flow (perm) 58 789 45 6 89 4 697 6 749 Peak-hour factor, PHF............ Adj. Flow (vph) 7 65 8 48 86 74 7 57 9 8 RTOR Reduction (vph) 8 Lane Group Flow (vph) 7 65 58 48 5 74 8 9 9 Heavy Vehicles (%) 5% 5% % 6% % 6% 9% % 4% % 4% 4% Turn Type Perm NA Perm pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Perm NA Protected Phases 6 7 4 8 Permitted Phases 6 4 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 4.4 4.4 4.4 56.4 56.4 6.4 6.4 46.4 46.4 Effective Green, g (s) 4.4 4.4 4.4 56.4 56.4 6.4 6.4 46.4 46.4 Actuated g/c Ratio....4.4.46.46.6.6 Clearance Time (s) 6.6 6.6 6.6. 6.6. 6.6 6.6 6.6 Vehicle Extension (s) 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. Lane Grp Cap (vph) 5 57 46 789 9 788 58 64 v/s Ratio Prot.65 c.8.7 c.7.75.68 v/s Ratio Perm.44. c.68.74 c.86 v/c Ratio.4.4.4.99.67.95.6.4.9 Uniform Delay, d 44. 44..9 7.8 6.8 8. 4.8 4.8 4.8 Progression Factor......... Incremental Delay, d 65.4 475.8. 46. 5.8 445. 86.8 677.8 45.9 Delay (s) 9.7 5. 5.9 5. 4.6 48..6 79.6 457.7 Level of Service F F D F F F F F F Approach Delay (s) 4.9 8.5 57.7 485. Approach LOS F F F F Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 48.9 HCM Level of Service F HCM Volume to Capacity ratio.8 Actuated Cycle Length (s). Sum of lost time (s).6 Intersection Capacity Utilization 9.% ICU Level of Service H Analysis Period (min) 5 c Critical Lane Group Bovaird Class EA Synchro 8 Report ENTRA Consultants Page

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis <Do Nothing> PM Peak Hour 4: Heritage Road & Bovaird Drive /4/ Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 76 58 4 8 95 6 68 6 96 66 48 5 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 Total Lost time (s) 7.4 7.4 6. 7.4 7.4 6. 6. 6. Lane Util. Factor........ Frpb, ped/bikes........98 Flpb, ped/bikes........ Frt...85...85.96.95 Flt Protected.95...95...99.99 Satd. Flow (prot) 785 77 597 785 84 597 786 77 Flt Permitted.8...8...76.78 Satd. Flow (perm) 48 77 597 48 84 597 78 6 Peak-hour factor, PHF............ Adj. Flow (vph) 76 58 4 8 95 6 68 6 96 66 48 5 RTOR Reduction (vph) 7 Lane Group Flow (vph) 76 58 8 95 5 7 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 7 Heavy Vehicles (%) % 6% % % % % % % % % % % Turn Type Perm NA custom Perm NA custom Perm NA Perm NA Protected Phases 6 4 8 Permitted Phases 4 6 8 4 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 5.7 5.7.7 5.7 5.7.7.7.7 Effective Green, g (s) 5.7 5.7.7 5.7 5.7.7.7.7 Actuated g/c Ratio.58.58.6.58.58.6.6.6 Clearance Time (s) 7.4 7.4 6. 7.4 7.4 6. 6. 6. Vehicle Extension (s) 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. Lane Grp Cap (vph) 86 47 86 7 47 6 55 v/s Ratio Prot c.87.65 v/s Ratio Perm.5..9.. c. v/c Ratio.88.49.5....86.86 Uniform Delay, d 5.6 8. 4. 9. 8. 4..6.7 Progression Factor........ Incremental Delay, d 68.7 5.. 9.8 64....6 Delay (s) 84.4 4. 4. 9. 8.4 4. 5.7 5. Level of Service F F C B F C D D Approach Delay (s).7 8. 5.7 5. Approach LOS F F D D Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 45.5 HCM Level of Service F HCM Volume to Capacity ratio. Actuated Cycle Length (s) 87. Sum of lost time (s).6 Intersection Capacity Utilization 7.% ICU Level of Service H Analysis Period (min) 5 c Critical Lane Group Bovaird Class EA Synchro 8 Report ENTRA Consultants Page 4

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis <Do Nothing> PM Peak Hour 5: Caseley Street & Bovaird Drive /4/ Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Volume (veh/h) 89 4 5 Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade % % % Peak Hour Factor...... Hourly flow rate (vph) 89 4 5 Pedestrians Lane Width (m).5.5.5 Walking Speed (m/s)... Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (m) px, platoon unblocked vc, conflicting volume 45 7 46 vc, stage conf vol vc, stage conf vol vcu, unblocked vol 45 7 46 tc, single (s) 4. 6.4 6. tc, stage (s) tf (s)..5. p queue free % cm capacity (veh/h) 5 97 64 Direction, Lane # EB WB NB Volume Total 9 7 Volume Left Volume Right 4 csh 7 5 97 Volume to Capacity... Queue Length 95th (m)... Control Delay (s).. 4. Lane LOS A B Approach Delay (s).. 4. Approach LOS B Intersection Summary Average Delay. Intersection Capacity Utilization.7% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 5 Bovaird Class EA Synchro 8 Report ENTRA Consultants Page 5

Traffic Excellence in Transportation Planning

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis <> AM Peak Hour : Lake Lousie Drive/Worthington Avenue & Bovaird Drive // Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 7 6 7 9 77 5 45 68 47 44 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 Total Lost time (s). 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.9 Lane Util. Factor..9..9..... Frpb, ped/bikes.....97..99..98 Flpb, ped/bikes........99. Frt.....85..9..86 Flt Protected.95..95...95..95. Satd. Flow (prot) 75 4746 78 489 4 78 684 74 74 Flt Permitted........68. Satd. Flow (perm) 6 4746 67 489 4 74 684 4 74 Peak-hour factor, PHF............ Adj. Flow (vph) 7 6 7 9 77 5 45 68 47 44 RTOR Reduction (vph) 8 97 Lane Group Flow (vph) 7 9 59 5 9 47 5 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 6 6 Heavy Vehicles (%) % 8% % % 6% % % % % % % 8% Turn Type pm+pt NA Perm NA Perm Perm NA Perm NA Protected Phases 5 6 4 8 Permitted Phases 6 6 4 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 6.8 6.8 4.6 4.6 4.6 9. 9. 9. 9. Effective Green, g (s) 6.8 6.8 4.6 4.6 4.6 9. 9. 9. 9. Actuated g/c Ratio.59.59....8.8.8.8 Clearance Time (s). 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.9 Vehicle Extension (s). 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. Lane Grp Cap (vph) 54 788 68 468 6 475 48 v/s Ratio Prot.7 c.8 c.9.5. v/s Ratio Perm...4.4 c. v/c Ratio..47..57..49.9.7.45 Uniform Delay, d.9..7 8.4.9. 8...6 Progression Factor......... Incremental Delay, d.4.6.6.5.6 7..4 8.. Delay (s)..8 5. 9.9 4.5 8. 8.6 4.4.6 Level of Service B B C C C D C D C Approach Delay (s).6 9..6 5.8 Approach LOS B C C D Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay.4 HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio.6 Actuated Cycle Length (s).5 Sum of lost time (s). Intersection Capacity Utilization.5% ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period (min) 5 c Critical Lane Group 9-55 Bovaird Class EA Synchro 8 Report ENTRA Consultants Page

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis <> AM Peak Hour : Bovaird Drive & Ashby Field Road 4/6/ Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 5 4 44 9 84 99 59 64 5 6 5 4 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 Total Lost time (s) 6. 6. 6.. 6. 6. 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 Lane Util. Factor..9...9....97. Frpb, ped/bikes...98.....98..99 Flpb, ped/bikes.......99... Frt...85...85..89..9 Flt Protected.95...95...95..95. Satd. Flow (prot) 785 4885 5 785 49 597 69 65 46 78 Flt Permitted.8......74..95. Satd. Flow (perm) 59 4885 5 49 597 4 65 46 78 Peak-hour factor, PHF............ Adj. Flow (vph) 5 4 44 9 84 99 59 64 5 6 5 4 RTOR Reduction (vph) 85 78 6 Lane Group Flow (vph) 5 4 9 84 4 59 9 6 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 5 5 Heavy Vehicles (%) % 5% % % 4% % 5% % % % % % Turn Type Perm Perm pm+pt Perm Perm Prot Protected Phases 6 4 8 Permitted Phases 6 6 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 55. 55. 55. 6. 6. 6... 7..9 Effective Green, g (s) 55. 55. 55. 6. 6. 6... 7..9 Actuated g/c Ratio.5.5.5.57.57.57.8.8.6. Clearance Time (s) 6. 6. 6.. 6. 6. 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 Vehicle Extension (s) 5. 5. 5.. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. Lane Grp Cap (vph) 79 44 765 86 98 4 5 v/s Ratio Prot.9. c.7.8 c.. v/s Ratio Perm...4.7 c. v/c Ratio.66.58..45.65..66.46.8.4 Uniform Delay, d.5 9.4 4..8 5.9.7 4.8 4. 49. 6.7 Progression Factor.......... Incremental Delay, d 5.6...6.. 8.5..5. Delay (s) 56..5 4. 4.4 7.. 5. 4.4 5.6 6.8 Level of Service E C B B B B D D D C Approach Delay (s).5 6.4 45.7 4. Approach LOS C B D D Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay.5 HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio.6 Actuated Cycle Length (s). Sum of lost time (s) 9.6 Intersection Capacity Utilization 88.% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 5 c Critical Lane Group 9-55 Bovaird Class EA Synchro 7 - Report ENTRA Consultants Page

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis <> AM Peak Hour : Bovaird Drive & Mississauga Road 4/6/ Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 74 57 65 9 8 8 48 86 7 7 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 Total Lost time (s). 6.6 6.6. 6.6 6.6. 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 Lane Util. Factor..9...9...9...9. Frt...85...85...85...85 Flt Protected.95...95...95...95.. Satd. Flow (prot) 55 4885 45 684 59 57 68 498 56 785 49 88 Flt Permitted............ Satd. Flow (perm) 77 4885 45 9 59 57 9 498 56 46 49 88 Peak-hour factor, PHF............ Adj. Flow (vph) 74 57 65 9 8 8 48 86 7 7 RTOR Reduction (vph) 56 4 7 9 Lane Group Flow (vph) 8 57 65 98 8 8 48 86 7 Heavy Vehicles (%) 5% 5% % 6% % 6% 9% % 4% % 4% 4% Turn Type pm+pt Perm pm+pt Perm pm+pt Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 5 6 7 4 8 Permitted Phases 6 6 4 4 8 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 8. 9.4 9.4 64.4 5.5 5.5 4.4 4.4 4.4 9.4 9.4 9.4 Effective Green, g (s) 8. 9.4 9.4 64.4 5.5 5.5 4.4 4.4 4.4 9.4 9.4 9.4 Actuated g/c Ratio..4.4.54.44.44.5.5.5.4.4.4 Clearance Time (s). 6.6 6.6. 6.6 6.6. 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 Vehicle Extension (s). 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. Lane Grp Cap (vph) 7 97 56 58 659 4 76 54 7 8 6 v/s Ratio Prot.4.5 c.. c.8..5 v/s Ratio Perm..5 c..7 c.7... v/c Ratio.55..6..5.5.98.6.7.8.6. Uniform Delay, d. 45. 4. 5. 4.7. 4.. 7.8 4.6 4. 5. Progression Factor............ Incremental Delay, d.9.5 7.7 79..9.5 5..9.6 45.5..6 Delay (s).9 78.8 47.9 4.7 5.6.8 87.. 8. 88. 4.4 5.6 Level of Service C E D F C C F C C F D D Approach Delay (s) 69. 5.4 9. 46. Approach LOS E D D D Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 5.5 HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capacity ratio.99 Actuated Cycle Length (s). Sum of lost time (s) 6. Intersection Capacity Utilization 6.% ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period (min) 5 c Critical Lane Group 9-55 Bovaird Class EA Synchro 7 - Report ENTRA Consultants Page

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis <> AM Peak Hour 4: Bovaird Drive & Heritage Road 4/6/ Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 5 95 68 96 58 66 4 48 8 6 6 76 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 Total Lost time (s) 7.4 7.4 7.4 7.4 7.4 7.4 6. 6. 6. 6. Lane Util. Factor..95...95...95..95 Frpb, ped/bikes..........99 Flpb, ped/bikes.......... Frt...85...85..98..95 Flt Protected.95...95...95..95. Satd. Flow (prot) 785 68 597 785 5 597 785 485 785 76 Flt Permitted.......6..64. Satd. Flow (perm) 4 68 597 9 5 597 485 4 76 Peak-hour factor, PHF............ Adj. Flow (vph) 5 95 68 96 58 66 4 48 8 6 6 76 RTOR Reduction (vph) 8 8 9 9 Lane Group Flow (vph) 5 95 5 96 58 58 4 57 6 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 7 Heavy Vehicles (%) % 6% % % % % % % % % % % Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 6 4 8 Permitted Phases 6 6 4 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5..... Effective Green, g (s) 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5..... Actuated g/c Ratio.68.68.68.68.68.68.5.5.5.5 Clearance Time (s) 7.4 7.4 7.4 7.4 7.4 7.4 6. 6. 6. 6. Vehicle Extension (s) 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. Lane Grp Cap (vph) 58 74 78 6 6 78 7 5 8 54 v/s Ratio Prot.5.44.4 c.6 v/s Ratio Perm c.49..5.4.. v/c Ratio.7.5.5.7.65.5.4.9.9.4 Uniform Delay, d 8. 6.4 4. 5.5 7.4 4. 8.9 9.6 8.7. Progression Factor.......... Incremental Delay, d 5..9..9.4..8.7.4. Delay (s).4 7. 4.4 9.4 8.8 4.4 9.7. 9.. Level of Service C A A A A A C C C C Approach Delay (s) 9.4 8.7.. Approach LOS A A C C Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay.8 HCM Level of Service B HCM Volume to Capacity ratio.67 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 78.8 Sum of lost time (s).6 Intersection Capacity Utilization 9.% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 5 c Critical Lane Group 9-55 Bovaird Class EA Synchro 7 - Report ENTRA Consultants Page 4

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis <> AM Peak Hour 5: Bovaird Drive & Caseley Street 4/6/ Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Volume (veh/h) 5 89 4 Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade % % % Peak Hour Factor...... Hourly flow rate (vph) 5 89 4 Pedestrians Lane Width (m).5.5.5 Walking Speed (m/s)... Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (m) px, platoon unblocked vc, conflicting volume 8 78 vc, stage conf vol vc, stage conf vol vcu, unblocked vol 8 78 tc, single (s) 4. 6.4 6. tc, stage (s) tf (s)..5. p queue free % 99 cm capacity (veh/h) 4 4 76 Direction, Lane # EB WB NB Volume Total 6 89 6 Volume Left 4 Volume Right csh 7 4 469 Volume to Capacity.8.. Queue Length 95th (m)... Control Delay (s)...8 Lane LOS B Approach Delay (s)...8 Approach LOS B Intersection Summary Average Delay. Intersection Capacity Utilization.4% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 5 9-55 Bovaird Class EA Synchro 7 - Report ENTRA Consultants Page 5

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis <> AM Peak Hour : James Potter Road/Creditview Road & Bovaird Drive /4/ Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 57 7 9 74 79 4 6 6 8 8 55 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 Total Lost time (s). 6.6 6.6. 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 Lane Util. Factor..9...9...95...95. Frpb, ped/bikes...97...97...97...68 Flpb, ped/bikes.......99...99.. Frt...85...85...85...85 Flt Protected.95...95...95...95.. Satd. Flow (prot) 75 466 5 749 466 5 7 5 5 75 5 66 Flt Permitted.......5...65.. Satd. Flow (perm) 466 5 68 466 5 9 5 5 8 5 66 Peak-hour factor, PHF............ Adj. Flow (vph) 57 7 9 74 79 4 6 6 8 8 55 RTOR Reduction (vph) 6 5 6 9 Lane Group Flow (vph) 57 9 74 8 4 6 8 8 6 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 7 Heavy Vehicles (%) % % % % % % % % % % % % Turn Type pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Perm Perm NA Perm Perm NA Perm Protected Phases 7 4 8 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8 6 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 46.8 8. 8. 9..6.6 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.6 Effective Green, g (s) 46.8 8. 8. 9..6.6 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.6 Actuated g/c Ratio.49.4.4.4.6.6.7.7.7.7.7.7 Clearance Time (s). 6.6 6.6. 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 Vehicle Extension (s)............ Lane Grp Cap (vph) 66 888 65 656 54 4 8 556 4 8 9 v/s Ratio Prot c.6.4. c.7.5 c. v/s Ratio Perm...4....7. v/c Ratio.59.6..9.77.5....9.. Uniform Delay, d 6.. 6.9 7.4 7.. 9. 9.9 9..4.4.4 Progression Factor............ Incremental Delay, d.5.5.........6.9 Delay (s) 9.5.6 6.9 8.5 9.. 9.. 9..4.. Level of Service B C B B C C B C B C C C Approach Delay (s). 8...4 Approach LOS C C B C Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 4.4 HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio.54 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 94.6 Sum of lost time (s) 6. Intersection Capacity Utilization 7.% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 5 c Critical Lane Group 9-55 Bovaird Class EA Synchro 8 Report ENTRA Consultants Page

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis <> PM Peak Hour : Lake Lousie Drive/Worthington Avenue & Bovaird Drive // Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 44 9 5 68 6 47 7 77 45 7 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 Total Lost time (s). 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.9 Lane Util. Factor..9..9..... Frpb, ped/bikes.....97..99..99 Flpb, ped/bikes........99. Frt..99...85..96..88 Flt Protected.95..95...95..95. Satd. Flow (prot) 75 476 78 489 99 777 79 7 48 Flt Permitted...8...47..7. Satd. Flow (perm) 7 476 54 489 99 87 79 48 Peak-hour factor, PHF............ Adj. Flow (vph) 44 9 5 68 6 47 7 77 45 7 RTOR Reduction (vph) 4 4 Lane Group Flow (vph) 44 978 68 6 7 5 77 95 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 6 6 Heavy Vehicles (%) % 8% % % 6% % % % % % % 8% Turn Type pm+pt NA Perm NA Perm Perm NA Perm NA Protected Phases 5 6 4 8 Permitted Phases 6 6 4 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 77.7 77.7 5.6 5.6 5.6.9.9.9.9 Effective Green, g (s) 77.7 77.7 5.6 5.6 5.6.9.9.9.9 Actuated g/c Ratio.69.69.46.46.46.9.9.9.9 Clearance Time (s). 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.9 Vehicle Extension (s). 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. Lane Grp Cap (vph) 47 4 9 8 68 69 47 54 4 v/s Ratio Prot c.8..7..8 v/s Ratio Perm c.4..8. c.4 v/c Ratio.88..8.6.8.4..7.9 Uniform Delay, d 5.8 7. 9.. 8. 7. 7.5 4.5 9.8 Progression Factor......... Incremental Delay, d 6.6....6.... Delay (s) 4.4 7.. 4. 8.8 7. 7.8 5.6 4. Level of Service D A C C B D D D D Approach Delay (s) 7.7. 7.7 46.8 Approach LOS B C D D Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay.9 HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio.8 Actuated Cycle Length (s). Sum of lost time (s) 9.9 Intersection Capacity Utilization 8.8% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 5 c Critical Lane Group 9-55 Bovaird Class EA Synchro 8 Report ENTRA Consultants Page

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis <> PM Peak Hour without NSTC : Bovaird Drive & Ashby Field Road /4/ Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 4 84 59 5 4 6 44 5 9 99 64 5 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 Total Lost time (s) 6. 6. 6.. 6. 6. 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 Lane Util. Factor..9...9....97. Frpb, ped/bikes...98.....98..99 Flpb, ped/bikes.......... Frt...85...85..87..9 Flt Protected.95...95...95..95. Satd. Flow (prot) 785 4885 5 785 49 597 69 64 46 79 Flt Permitted.8...7...68..95. Satd. Flow (perm) 4885 5 7 49 597 6 64 46 79 Peak-hour factor, PHF............ Adj. Flow (vph) 4 84 59 5 4 6 44 5 9 99 64 5 RTOR Reduction (vph) 78 4 8 9 Lane Group Flow (vph) 4 84 8 5 4 8 44 5 99 97 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 5 5 Heavy Vehicles (%) % 5% % % 4% % 5% % % % % % Turn Type Perm Perm pm+pt Perm Perm Prot Protected Phases 6 4 8 Permitted Phases 6 6 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 5.8 5.8 5.8 6.8 6.8 6.8.. 9.4 7. Effective Green, g (s) 5.8 5.8 5.8 6.8 6.8 6.8.. 9.4 7. Actuated g/c Ratio.5.5.5.6.6.6...9.7 Clearance Time (s) 6. 6. 6.. 6. 6. 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 Vehicle Extension (s) 5. 5. 5.. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. Lane Grp Cap (vph) 68 48 778 96 988 968 4 76 9 465 v/s Ratio Prot.8 c.5.9. c.6.6 v/s Ratio Perm.4.5 c.4. c.4 v/c Ratio.8.74..78.48.4..4.6. Uniform Delay, d.9 9.8. 9.. 8. 4.9 4. 44.6 9. Progression Factor.......... Incremental Delay, d... 8..5...8 5..5 Delay (s).9.9. 7..7 8. 44.9 4.8 49.9 9.4 Level of Service B C B D B A D D D C Approach Delay (s)..9 4.7 4.4 Approach LOS C B D D Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay.7 HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio.67 Actuated Cycle Length (s). Sum of lost time (s) 6.4 Intersection Capacity Utilization 7.% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 5 c Critical Lane Group Bovaird Class EA Synchro 7 - Report ENTRA Consultants Page

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis <> PM Peak Hour without NSTC : Bovaird Drive & Mississauga Road /4/ Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 7 65 8 48 86 74 7 57 9 8 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 Total Lost time (s). 6.6 6.6. 6.6 6.6. 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 Lane Util. Factor..9...9...9...9. Frt...85...85...85...85 Flt Protected.95...95...95...95.. Satd. Flow (prot) 55 4885 45 684 59 57 68 498 56 785 49 88 Flt Permitted.8.........6.. Satd. Flow (perm) 94 4885 45 59 57 5 498 56 68 49 88 Peak-hour factor, PHF............ Adj. Flow (vph) 7 65 8 48 86 74 7 57 9 8 RTOR Reduction (vph) 54 49 65 76 Lane Group Flow (vph) 7 65 84 48 7 74 7 47 9 8 7 Heavy Vehicles (%) 5% 5% % 6% % 6% 9% % 4% % 4% 4% Turn Type pm+pt Perm pm+pt Perm pm+pt Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 5 6 7 4 8 Permitted Phases 6 6 4 4 8 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 49. 4.4 4.4 6.4 5.8 5.8 46. 46. 46. 9. 9. 9. Effective Green, g (s) 49. 4.4 4.4 6.4 5.8 5.8 46. 46. 46. 9. 9. 9. Actuated g/c Ratio.4.5.5.5.4.4.8.8.8.4.4.4 Clearance Time (s). 6.6 6.6. 6.6 6.6. 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 Vehicle Extension (s). 5. 5. 5. 5. 5.. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. Lane Grp Cap (vph) 88 77 5 7 6 647 47 9 586 64 86 v/s Ratio Prot..4 c.8.4 c.8.5. v/s Ratio Perm..6 c.5. c.4.6.. v/c Ratio.7.68.6.6.57.6.5.8.69.85.9. Uniform Delay, d.5. 6.9.6 6... 7..4 4.7 44.6 5.8 Progression Factor............ Incremental Delay, d...7 8.4.. 5.. 4.5 8.9..8 Delay (s).8 5.5 7.6. 7.. 84.4 7. 5.9 8.6 56.7 6.6 Level of Service C D C F C C F C D F E D Approach Delay (s).6 7.5 87.6 57.7 Approach LOS C E F E Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 6.9 HCM Level of Service E HCM Volume to Capacity ratio. Actuated Cycle Length (s).6 Sum of lost time (s) 6. Intersection Capacity Utilization 5.% ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period (min) 5 c Critical Lane Group Bovaird Class EA Synchro 7 - Report ENTRA Consultants Page

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis <> PM Peak Hour without NSTC 4: Bovaird Drive & Heritage Road /4/ Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 76 58 4 8 95 6 68 6 96 66 48 5 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 Total Lost time (s) 7.4 7.4 7.4 7.4 7.4 7.4 6. 6. 6. 6. Lane Util. Factor..95...95...95..95 Frpb, ped/bikes..........99 Flpb, ped/bikes.......... Frt...85...85..94..9 Flt Protected.95...95...95..95. Satd. Flow (prot) 785 68 597 785 5 597 785 7 785 4 Flt Permitted.......59..59. Satd. Flow (perm) 86 68 597 9 5 597 7 7 4 Peak-hour factor, PHF............ Adj. Flow (vph) 76 58 4 8 95 6 68 6 96 66 48 5 RTOR Reduction (vph) 5 4 8 64 Lane Group Flow (vph) 76 58 9 8 95 68 66 99 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 7 Heavy Vehicles (%) % 6% % % % % % % % % % % Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 6 4 8 Permitted Phases 6 6 4 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5..... Effective Green, g (s) 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5..... Actuated g/c Ratio.67.67.67.67.67.67.6.6.6.6 Clearance Time (s) 7.4 7.4 7.4 7.4 7.4 7.4 6. 6. 6. 6. Vehicle Extension (s) 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. Lane Grp Cap (vph) 57 47 65 5 5 65 8 548 8 58 v/s Ratio Prot c.46.4 c.7.6 v/s Ratio Perm.....6.6 v/c Ratio..68..8.5..8.4.6.7 Uniform Delay, d 5.5 8. 4.5 5. 6.7 4.5 9.8. 9.8 9.8 Progression Factor.......... Incremental Delay, d.9.7..6.8..8..6.9 Delay (s) 8.4 9.9 4.5 7.7 7.5 4.5.6..4.7 Level of Service A A A A A A C C C C Approach Delay (s) 9.7 7.5.5. Approach LOS A A C C Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay.9 HCM Level of Service B HCM Volume to Capacity ratio.6 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 79.9 Sum of lost time (s).6 Intersection Capacity Utilization 94.5% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 5 c Critical Lane Group Bovaird Class EA Synchro 7 - Report ENTRA Consultants Page 4

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis <> PM Peak Hour without NSTC 5: Bovaird Drive & Caseley Street /4/ Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Volume (veh/h) 89 4 5 Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade % % % Peak Hour Factor...... Hourly flow rate (vph) 89 4 5 Pedestrians Lane Width (m).5.5.5 Walking Speed (m/s)... Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (m) px, platoon unblocked vc, conflicting volume 45 7 46 vc, stage conf vol vc, stage conf vol vcu, unblocked vol 45 7 46 tc, single (s) 4. 6.4 6. tc, stage (s) tf (s)..5. p queue free % cm capacity (veh/h) 5 97 64 Direction, Lane # EB WB NB Volume Total 9 7 Volume Left Volume Right 4 csh 7 5 97 Volume to Capacity... Queue Length 95th (m)... Control Delay (s).. 4. Lane LOS A B Approach Delay (s).. 4. Approach LOS B Intersection Summary Average Delay. Intersection Capacity Utilization.7% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 5 Bovaird Class EA Synchro 7 - Report ENTRA Consultants Page 5

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis <> PM Peak Hour with NSTC 4: James Potter Road/Creditview Road & Bovaird Drive /4/ Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 5 48 9 6 88 96 88 9 95 96 7 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 Total Lost time (s). 6.6 6.6. 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 Lane Util. Factor..9...9...95...95. Frpb, ped/bikes...97...97...97...69 Flpb, ped/bikes.......99...99.. Frt...85...85...85...85 Flt Protected.95...95...95...95.. Satd. Flow (prot) 75 466 5 749 466 5 79 5 5 74 5 7 Flt Permitted....8...6...5.. Satd. Flow (perm) 44 466 5 9 466 5 44 5 5 96 5 7 Peak-hour factor, PHF............ Adj. Flow (vph) 5 48 9 6 88 96 88 9 95 96 7 RTOR Reduction (vph) 5 6 64 Lane Group Flow (vph) 5 48 4 6 88 4 88 7 95 96 5 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Heavy Vehicles (%) % % % % % % % % % % % % Turn Type pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Perm Perm NA Perm Perm NA Perm Protected Phases 7 4 8 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8 6 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 46. 4.6 4.6. 9.9 9.9 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.6 Effective Green, g (s) 46. 4.6 4.6. 9.9 9.9 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.6 Actuated g/c Ratio.55.48.48.9.6.6.9.9.9.9.9.9 Clearance Time (s). 6.6 6.6. 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 Vehicle Extension (s)............ Lane Grp Cap (vph) 69 59 78 67 664 54 6 7 447 69 7 5 v/s Ratio Prot c....5 c..6 v/s Ratio Perm c.7..6.....5 v/c Ratio.68.6..6.7.6.9.8.6.5.9.6 Uniform Delay, d. 6.. 6.. 7.7.5.5....9 Progression Factor............ Incremental Delay, d 5..5..4.5..5...6.4. Delay (s) 8. 6.5. 6.5 4.7 7.8. 4.6.5 6.9.6. Level of Service B B B B C B C C C C C C Approach Delay (s) 6.7 4..9.6 Approach LOS B C C C Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay.9 HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio.54 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 8.8 Sum of lost time (s) 9.6 Intersection Capacity Utilization 75.% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 5 c Critical Lane Group 9-55 Bovaird Class EA Synchro 8 Report ENTRA Consultants Page

Traffic Excellence in Transportation Planning

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis < with NSTC> AM Peak Hour : Lake Lousie Drive/Worthington Avenue & Bovaird Drive // Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 89 6 7 4 45 95 64 5 69 5 6 59 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 Total Lost time (s) 4. 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 4. 6.9 6.9 6.9 Lane Util. Factor..9..9..... Frpb, ped/bikes.....97..99..98 Flpb, ped/bikes........99. Frt.....85..9..86 Flt Protected.95..95...95..95. Satd. Flow (prot) 75 4746 78 489 99 785 69 74 7 Flt Permitted...9.....68. Satd. Flow (perm) 6 4746 59 489 99 47 69 7 7 Peak-hour factor, PHF............ Adj. Flow (vph) 89 6 7 4 45 95 64 5 69 5 6 59 RTOR Reduction (vph) 4 8 Lane Group Flow (vph) 89 4 4 45 5 64 96 5 6 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 6 6 Heavy Vehicles (%) % 8% % % 6% % % % % % % 8% Turn Type pm+pt NA Perm NA Perm pm+pt NA Perm NA Protected Phases 5 6 7 4 8 Permitted Phases 6 6 4 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 57.8 57.8 8.6 8.6 8.6 5. 5. 6.4 6.4 Effective Green, g (s) 57.8 57.8 8.6 8.6 8.6 5. 5. 6.4 6.4 Actuated g/c Ratio.54.54.7.7.7...5.5 Clearance Time (s) 4. 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 4. 6.9 6.9 6.9 Vehicle Extension (s). 5. 5. 5. 5.. 5. 5. 5. Lane Grp Cap (vph) 484 58 97 76 48 557 5 9 v/s Ratio Prot.9 c.8 c.4 c..6.4 v/s Ratio Perm..4.4. c. v/c Ratio.9.5.4.88.4.4.7.8.56 Uniform Delay, d 5.4 5.4 9.5 7. 9.5 8. 5.4 7.7 4.9 Progression Factor......... Incremental Delay, d.5.8. 8.7.8.. 8..9 Delay (s) 5.9 6..6 45.9.. 5.7 55.7 8.8 Level of Service B B C D C C C E D Approach Delay (s) 6. 4.5 7. 44. Approach LOS B D C D Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay. HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio.76 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 6. Sum of lost time (s) 4. Intersection Capacity Utilization 4.4% ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period (min) 5 c Critical Lane Group 9-55 Bovaird Class EA Synchro 8 Report ENTRA Consultants Page

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis < with NSTC> AM Peak Hour : Bovaird Drive & Ashby Field Road 4/7/ Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 57 44 49 8 7 55 6 6 8 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 Total Lost time (s) 6. 6. 6.. 6. 6. 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 Lane Util. Factor..9...9....97. Frpb, ped/bikes...98.....98..99 Flpb, ped/bikes.......99... Frt...85...85..9..9 Flt Protected.95...95...95..95. Satd. Flow (prot) 785 4885 5 785 49 597 69 657 46 7 Flt Permitted.8......7..95. Satd. Flow (perm) 4 4885 5 99 49 597 8 657 46 7 Peak-hour factor, PHF............ Adj. Flow (vph) 57 44 49 8 7 55 6 6 8 RTOR Reduction (vph) 6 97 69 Lane Group Flow (vph) 57 44 8 57 6 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 5 5 Heavy Vehicles (%) % 5% % % 4% % 5% % % % % % Turn Type Perm Perm pm+pt Perm Perm Prot Protected Phases 6 4 8 Permitted Phases 6 6 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 5.8 5.8 5.8 6.6 6.6 6.6.. 7. 6.8 Effective Green, g (s) 5.8 5.8 5.8 6.6 6.6 6.6.. 7. 6.8 Actuated g/c Ratio.47.47.47.56.56.56...6. Clearance Time (s) 6. 6. 6.. 6. 6. 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 Vehicle Extension (s) 5. 5. 5.. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. Lane Grp Cap (vph) 67 97 7 7 749 89 69 4 6 56 v/s Ratio Prot.9. c.47.9 c.. v/s Ratio Perm.4..4.8 c.5 v/c Ratio.85.6..49.85.4.75.46.9.6 Uniform Delay, d 6..4 6. 4.6.9.9 4.9 9. 5. 5.9 Progression Factor.......... Incremental Delay, d 7....8.5....5. Delay (s) 99.5.7 6. 6.5 4.5. 55. 4. 5.8 6. Level of Service F C B B C B E D D C Approach Delay (s) 6.. 47.7 4.7 Approach LOS C C D D Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 6.8 HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio.78 Actuated Cycle Length (s). Sum of lost time (s) 9.6 Intersection Capacity Utilization 97.6% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 5 c Critical Lane Group 9-55 Bovaird Class EA Synchro 7 - Report ENTRA Consultants Page

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis < with NSTC> AM Peak Hour : Bovaird Drive & Mississauga Road 4/7/ Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 79 7 8 56 86 98 75 757 6 6 66 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 Total Lost time (s). 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6. 6.6 6.6 Lane Util. Factor..9..97.9..97.9...9. Frt...85...85...85...85 Flt Protected.95...95...95...95.. Satd. Flow (prot) 55 4885 45 67 59 57 77 498 56 785 49 88 Flt Permitted.8...95...95...5.. Satd. Flow (perm) 8 4885 45 67 59 57 77 498 56 66 49 88 Peak-hour factor, PHF............ Adj. Flow (vph) 79 7 8 56 86 98 75 757 6 6 66 RTOR Reduction (vph) 6 6 5 58 Lane Group Flow (vph) 79 7 77 56 86 8 75 757 9 6 66 5 Heavy Vehicles (%) 5% 5% % 6% % 6% 9% % 4% % 4% 4% Turn Type pm+pt Perm Prot Perm Prot Perm pm+pt Perm Protected Phases 5 6 7 4 8 Permitted Phases 6 4 8 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 54. 47. 47..4 65.4 65.4 5.9 4.5 4.5 6. 9. 9. Effective Green, g (s) 54. 47. 47..4 65.4 65.4 5.9 4.5 4.5 6. 9. 9. Actuated g/c Ratio.9.4.4.5.47.47....6.. Clearance Time (s). 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6. 6.6 6.6 Vehicle Extension (s). 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5.. 5. 5. Lane Grp Cap (vph) 65 49 499 49 74 6 476 455 7 67 v/s Ratio Prot. c.5 c.6.7 c..5. c. v/s Ratio Perm...5.6..4 v/c Ratio.64.4.6..78..4.5..47.65. Uniform Delay, d 9.8 46.4 4.9 59... 6. 4.9 6.8 4. 5.8 45.9 Progression Factor............ Incremental Delay, d.9.. 49..7. 57.8.6.5.5..6 Delay (s) 4.7 78.5 7. 8.6 4..4 9.8 4.5 7. 4.6 5.9 47.5 Level of Service D E D F C C F D D D D D Approach Delay (s) 7.5 49. 6. 5.8 Approach LOS E D E D Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 58.6 HCM Level of Service E HCM Volume to Capacity ratio.94 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 4. Sum of lost time (s) 6.4 Intersection Capacity Utilization 9.% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 5 c Critical Lane Group 9-55 Bovaird Class EA Synchro 7 - Report ENTRA Consultants Page

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis < with NSTC> AM Peak Hour 4: Bovaird Drive & Heritage Road 4/7/ Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 7 5 7 4 9 6 4 7 5 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 Total Lost time (s) 7.4 7.4 7.4 7.4 7.4 7.4 6. 6. 6. 6. Lane Util. Factor..95...95...95..95 Frpb, ped/bikes..........99 Flpb, ped/bikes.......... Frt...85...85..96..96 Flt Protected.95...95...95..95. Satd. Flow (prot) 785 68 597 785 5 597 785 46 785 89 Flt Permitted.6...7...64..7. Satd. Flow (perm) 494 68 597 7 5 597 8 46 46 89 Peak-hour factor, PHF............ Adj. Flow (vph) 7 5 7 4 9 6 4 7 5 RTOR Reduction (vph) 5 5 44 Lane Group Flow (vph) 7 5 7 4 6 6 44 8 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 7 Heavy Vehicles (%) % 6% % % % % % % % % % % Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 6 4 8 Permitted Phases 6 6 4 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 56. 56. 56. 56. 56. 56..... Effective Green, g (s) 56. 56. 56. 56. 56. 56..... Actuated g/c Ratio.7.7.7.7.7.7.... Clearance Time (s) 7.4 7.4 7.4 7.4 7.4 7.4 6. 6. 6. 6. Vehicle Extension (s) 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. Lane Grp Cap (vph) 47 65 494 457 54 46 7 4 v/s Ratio Prot. c.. c.4 v/s Ratio Perm.7..... v/c Ratio....4.4....6.9 Uniform Delay, d.8 4.5.6.9 5..6.8.8.6.6 Progression Factor.......... Incremental Delay, d.5...6.5..6...8 Delay (s) 4. 4.9.7 4.6 5.6.6.4..9.4 Level of Service A A A A A A C C C C Approach Delay (s) 4.8 5.5.. Approach LOS A A C C Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 8. HCM Level of Service A HCM Volume to Capacity ratio.4 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 79.9 Sum of lost time (s).6 Intersection Capacity Utilization 7.7% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 5 c Critical Lane Group 9-55 Bovaird Class EA Synchro 7 - Report ENTRA Consultants Page 4

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis < with NSTC> AM Peak Hour 5: Bovaird Drive & Caseley Street 4/7/ Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Volume (veh/h) 5 Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade % % % Peak Hour Factor...... Hourly flow rate (vph) 5 Pedestrians Lane Width (m).5.5.5 Walking Speed (m/s)... Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (m) px, platoon unblocked vc, conflicting volume 8 6 vc, stage conf vol vc, stage conf vol vcu, unblocked vol 8 6 tc, single (s) 4. 6.4 6. tc, stage (s) tf (s)..5. p queue free % cm capacity (veh/h) 9 76 84 Direction, Lane # EB WB NB Volume Total 6 Volume Left Volume Right csh 7 9 84 Volume to Capacity... Queue Length 95th (m)... Control Delay (s).. 9.5 Lane LOS A Approach Delay (s).. 9.5 Approach LOS A Intersection Summary Average Delay. Intersection Capacity Utilization.% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 5 9-55 Bovaird Class EA Synchro 7 - Report ENTRA Consultants Page 5

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis < with NSTC> AM Peak Hour 6: James Potter Road/Creditview Road & Bovaird Drive // Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 45 4 77 7 95 6 7 79 79 55 74 59 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 Total Lost time (s). 6. 6.. 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6. 6.6 6.6 Lane Util. Factor..9...9...95...95. Frt...85...85...85...85 Flt Protected.95...95...95...95.. Satd. Flow (prot) 75 59 566 75 59 566 75 5 566 75 5 566 Flt Permitted.7...6........ Satd. Flow (perm) 6 59 566 59 566 56 5 566 577 5 566 Peak-hour factor, PHF............ Adj. Flow (vph) 45 4 77 7 95 6 7 79 79 55 74 59 RTOR Reduction (vph) 8 66 55 Lane Group Flow (vph) 45 4 49 7 95 95 7 79 55 74 64 Turn Type pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Perm Perm NA Perm pm+pt NA Perm Protected Phases 7 4 8 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8 6 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 8. 6.5 6.5 67. 5.5 5.5.4.4.4 5.9 5.9 5.9 Effective Green, g (s) 8. 6.5 6.5 67. 5.5 5.5.4.4.4 5.9 5.9 5.9 Actuated g/c Ratio.6.47.47.5.9.9.6.6.6.8.8.8 Clearance Time (s). 6. 6.. 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6. 6.6 6.6 Vehicle Extension (s)............ Lane Grp Cap (vph) 4 85 74 4 958 6 9 577 58 64 969 4 v/s Ratio Prot c..6..8..5 c. v/s Ratio Perm c.4...6....7 v/c Ratio.98.55.7.79.98.6.8.66.5.59.75.6 Uniform Delay, d 4. 4. 8.5 8.9 9. 5.7 45.8 5.7 45.6 7.7 4.8 4.8 Progression Factor............ Incremental Delay, d 9....9 6.4...7....5 Delay (s) 8. 4.5 8.5.8 55.6 5.9 46. 5.4 45.7 4. 45.9 4.4 Level of Service F C B C E C D D D D D D Approach Delay (s) 7. 5. 5. 44.4 Approach LOS D D D D Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 45. HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capacity ratio.88 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 9.7 Sum of lost time (s) 9.6 Intersection Capacity Utilization.4% ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period (min) 5 c Critical Lane Group 9-55 Bovaird Class EA Synchro 8 Report ENTRA Consultants Page

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis <> PM Peak Hour with NSTC : Lake Lousie Drive/Worthington Avenue & Bovaird Drive // Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 59 45 64 69 6 5 7 6 4 95 5 89 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 Total Lost time (s). 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.9 Lane Util. Factor..9..9..... Frpb, ped/bikes.....97..99..99 Flpb, ped/bikes........99. Frt..99...85..96..88 Flt Protected.95..95...95..95. Satd. Flow (prot) 75 477 78 489 4 778 788 75 5 Flt Permitted......49..7. Satd. Flow (perm) 477 44 489 4 9 788 7 5 Peak-hour factor, PHF............ Adj. Flow (vph) 59 45 64 69 6 5 7 6 4 95 5 89 RTOR Reduction (vph) 5 7 47 Lane Group Flow (vph) 59 4 69 6 79 7 9 95 9 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 6 6 Heavy Vehicles (%) % 8% % % 6% % % % % % % 8% Turn Type pm+pt NA Perm NA Perm Perm NA Perm NA Protected Phases 5 6 4 8 Permitted Phases 6 6 4 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 57.7 57.7 8.8 8.8 8.8.6.6.6.6 Effective Green, g (s) 57.7 57.7 8.8 8.8 8.8.6.6.6.6 Actuated g/c Ratio.6.6....... Clearance Time (s). 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.9 Vehicle Extension (s). 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. Lane Grp Cap (vph) 574 965 58 44 6 4 9 8 v/s Ratio Prot c.5.6.8..7 v/s Ratio Perm c..7.6. c.5 v/c Ratio.89.4.5.88.8...67. Uniform Delay, d. 8.5 5.9 9.9.9 7.8 8..5 9.8 Progression Factor......... Incremental Delay, d 5..4 4.6 7.6.9.. 7.4.4 Delay (s) 8.5 8.9 4.6 7.5.8 8. 8.5 9.8. Level of Service D A D D C C C D C Approach Delay (s) 7.7 5.5 8.4 5. Approach LOS B D C D Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 7.5 HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio.79 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 9.8 Sum of lost time (s) 9.9 Intersection Capacity Utilization 87.% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 5 c Critical Lane Group 9-55 Bovaird Class EA Synchro 8 Report ENTRA Consultants Page

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis <> PM Peak with NSTC (Single WB Left) : Bovaird Drive & Ashby Field Road /4/ Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 8 8 55 44 6 49 6 7 57 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 Total Lost time (s) 6. 6. 6.. 6. 6. 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 Lane Util. Factor..9...9....97. Frpb, ped/bikes...98.....98..99 Flpb, ped/bikes.......... Frt...85...85..87..9 Flt Protected.95...95...95..95. Satd. Flow (prot) 785 4885 5 785 49 597 69 6 46 74 Flt Permitted.7...7...67..95. Satd. Flow (perm) 4885 5 7 49 597 6 46 74 Peak-hour factor, PHF............ Adj. Flow (vph) 8 8 55 44 6 49 6 7 57 RTOR Reduction (vph) 79 5 9 8 Lane Group Flow (vph) 8 8 55 44 7 49 7 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 5 5 Heavy Vehicles (%) % 5% % % 4% % 5% % % % % % Turn Type Perm Perm pm+pt Perm Perm Prot Protected Phases 6 4 8 Permitted Phases 6 6 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 5.8 5.8 5.8 6.8 6.8 6.8.5.5 9.4 7.6 Effective Green, g (s) 5.8 5.8 5.8 6.8 6.8 6.8.5.5 9.4 7.6 Actuated g/c Ratio.5.5.5.6.6.6...9.7 Clearance Time (s) 6. 6. 6.. 6. 6. 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 Vehicle Extension (s) 5. 5. 5.. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. Lane Grp Cap (vph) 6 474 775 96 979 965 5 8 8 469 v/s Ratio Prot c.48 c.5.9. c.6.6 v/s Ratio Perm.6.8.4. c.4 v/c Ratio..95.6.79.48.4.6.5.69.4 Uniform Delay, d..9.6.. 8. 4. 4. 45. 9. Progression Factor.......... Incremental Delay, d.4 9..4 9..6..5.8 8..5 Delay (s) 4.6. 4. 4.5.9 8. 45.5 4.8 5. 9.7 Level of Service B C B D B A D D D C Approach Delay (s).4 4.6 4.9 44.5 Approach LOS C B D D Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 6.9 HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio.8 Actuated Cycle Length (s). Sum of lost time (s).6 Intersection Capacity Utilization 9.% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 5 c Critical Lane Group Bovaird Class EA Synchro 7 - Report ENTRA Consultants Page

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis <> PM Peak with NSTC (Single WB Left) : Bovaird Drive & Mississauga Road /4/ Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 86 75 6 7 6 8 66 56 98 757 79 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 Total Lost time (s). 6.6 6.6. 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 Lane Util. Factor..9...9..97.9...9. Frt...85...85...85...85 Flt Protected.95...95...95...95.. Satd. Flow (prot) 55 4885 45 684 59 57 77 498 56 785 49 88 Flt Permitted.8...7...95...9.. Satd. Flow (perm) 4 4885 45 8 59 57 77 498 56 7 49 88 Peak-hour factor, PHF............ Adj. Flow (vph) 86 75 6 7 6 8 66 56 98 757 79 RTOR Reduction (vph) 8 7 79 6 Lane Group Flow (vph) 86 9 6 7 69 8 66 7 98 757 7 Heavy Vehicles (%) 5% 5% % 6% % 6% 9% % 4% % 4% 4% Turn Type pm+pt Perm pm+pt Perm Prot Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 5 6 7 4 8 Permitted Phases 6 6 4 8 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 6. 5.5 5.5 76.5 6. 6. 4.4 5. 5. 9. 9. 9. Effective Green, g (s) 6. 5.5 5.5 76.5 6. 6. 4.4 5. 5. 9. 9. 9. Actuated g/c Ratio.45.8.8.55.45.45..6.6... Clearance Time (s). 6.6 6.6. 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 Vehicle Extension (s). 5. 5.. 5. 5.. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. Lane Grp Cap (vph) 6 8 545 6 678 7 789 55 5 7 v/s Ratio Prot.5.8 c.5.4 c.. c.5 v/s Ratio Perm.5. c.4.5... v/c Ratio.67..5..76...7.6.64.7.6 Uniform Delay, d 6.7 4.8.5 46.5.. 6.8. 6.8 5.5 5.7 44. Progression Factor............ Incremental Delay, d.5.5.8 54..4. 58.7..9 8.8 4.6.4 Delay (s) 7. 65...8 4.5.5.5.4 9.7 69. 56. 44.8 Level of Service D E C F C C F C D E E D Approach Delay (s) 58.8 4.5 55. 56.7 Approach LOS E D E E Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 5. HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capacity ratio.9 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 4. Sum of lost time (s) 6. Intersection Capacity Utilization 96.5% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 5 c Critical Lane Group Bovaird Class EA Synchro 7 - Report ENTRA Consultants Page

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis <> PM Peak with NSTC (WB Double Left) : Bovaird Drive & Mississauga Road /4/ Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 86 75 6 7 6 8 66 56 98 757 79 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 Total Lost time (s). 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 Lane Util. Factor..9..97.9..97.9...9. Frt...85...85...85...85 Flt Protected.95...95...95...95.. Satd. Flow (prot) 55 4885 45 67 59 57 77 498 56 785 49 88 Flt Permitted.7...95...95...9.. Satd. Flow (perm) 4885 45 67 59 57 77 498 56 7 49 88 Peak-hour factor, PHF............ Adj. Flow (vph) 86 75 6 7 6 8 66 56 98 757 79 RTOR Reduction (vph) 9 8 8 6 Lane Group Flow (vph) 86 8 6 7 68 8 66 98 98 757 6 Heavy Vehicles (%) 5% 5% % 6% % 6% 9% % 4% % 4% 4% Turn Type pm+pt Perm Prot Perm Prot Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 5 6 7 4 8 Permitted Phases 6 4 8 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 64.4 54.6 54.6 4. 6.5 6.5 5.9 5.5 5.5 9. 9. 9. Effective Green, g (s) 64.4 54.6 54.6 4. 6.5 6.5 5.9 5.5 5.5 9. 9. 9. Actuated g/c Ratio.46.9.9..45.45..7.7... Clearance Time (s). 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 Vehicle Extension (s). 5. 5.. 5. 5.. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. Lane Grp Cap (vph) 55 95 566 9 45 67 6 8 565 5 67 v/s Ratio Prot.5 c.8 c.9 c.4 c...5 v/s Ratio Perm.8..5 c.6.. v/c Ratio.7.96..9.76..94.6.7.64.74.6 Uniform Delay, d 6.8 4.7 9.8 6.5.5.5 6.5. 7.8 5.8 5. 44.6 Progression Factor............ Incremental Delay, d.9.7.5..5... 5. 9. 4.8.4 Delay (s) 4.7 55.4. 94.5 5..8 9.7.5 4.8 7. 56.8 45. Level of Service D E C F D C F C D E E D Approach Delay (s) 5.8 4. 49.4 57. Approach LOS D D D E Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 49. HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capacity ratio.9 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 4. Sum of lost time (s) 6.4 Intersection Capacity Utilization 9.9% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 5 c Critical Lane Group Bovaird Class EA Synchro 7 - Report ENTRA Consultants Page

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis <> PM Peak with NSTC (Single WB Left) 4: Bovaird Drive & Heritage Road /4/ Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 5 4 6 7 7 5 7 9 4 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 Total Lost time (s) 7.4 7.4 7.4 7.4 7.4 7.4 6. 6. 6. 6. Lane Util. Factor..95...95...95..95 Frpb, ped/bikes..........99 Flpb, ped/bikes.......... Frt...85...85..94..9 Flt Protected.95...95...95..95. Satd. Flow (prot) 785 68 597 785 5 597 785 7 785 Flt Permitted.7...6...7..6. Satd. Flow (perm) 7 68 597 49 5 597 6 7 86 Peak-hour factor, PHF............ Adj. Flow (vph) 5 4 6 7 7 5 7 9 4 RTOR Reduction (vph) 5 6 9 Lane Group Flow (vph) 5 4 7 7 7 5 9 46 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 7 Heavy Vehicles (%) % 6% % % % % % % % % % % Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 6 4 8 Permitted Phases 6 6 4 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 56. 56. 56. 56. 56. 56..6.6.6.6 Effective Green, g (s) 56. 56. 56. 56. 56. 56..6.6.6.6 Actuated g/c Ratio.7.7.7.7.7.7.... Clearance Time (s) 7.4 7.4 7.4 7.4 7.4 7.4 6. 6. 6. 6. Vehicle Extension (s) 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. Lane Grp Cap (vph) 49 5 6 44 445 6 75 445 57 46 v/s Ratio Prot c.. c.4. v/s Ratio Perm.7....4. v/c Ratio..44..5...9.9.. Uniform Delay, d.9 5..7.8 4.6.7.4.5.7.7 Progression Factor.......... Incremental Delay, d.4.6.....9.8.7. Delay (s) 4.4 5.9.7 4. 4.9.7...5.9 Level of Service A A A A A A C C C C Approach Delay (s) 5.8 4.9.5. Approach LOS A A C C Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 9.5 HCM Level of Service A HCM Volume to Capacity ratio.4 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 8. Sum of lost time (s).6 Intersection Capacity Utilization 69.5% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 5 c Critical Lane Group Bovaird Class EA Synchro 7 - Report ENTRA Consultants Page 4

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis<> PM Peak with NSTC (Single WB Left) 5: Bovaird Drive & Caseley Street /4/ Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Volume (veh/h) 5 Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade % % % Peak Hour Factor...... Hourly flow rate (vph) 5 Pedestrians Lane Width (m).5.5.5 Walking Speed (m/s)... Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (m) px, platoon unblocked vc, conflicting volume 4 6 46 vc, stage conf vol vc, stage conf vol vcu, unblocked vol 4 6 46 tc, single (s) 4. 6.4 6. tc, stage (s) tf (s)..5. p queue free % cm capacity (veh/h) 56 74 7 Direction, Lane # EB WB NB Volume Total 6 Volume Left Volume Right csh 7 56 74 Volume to Capacity... Queue Length 95th (m)... Control Delay (s)... Lane LOS A A Approach Delay (s)... Approach LOS A Intersection Summary Average Delay. Intersection Capacity Utilization.% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 5 Bovaird Class EA Synchro 7 - Report ENTRA Consultants Page 5

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis <> PM Peak Hour with NSTC : James Potter Road/Creditview Road & Bovaird Drive // Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 59 95 7 79 4 55 77 74 7 6 79 45 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 Total Lost time (s) 6.6 6.6 6.6. 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6. 6.6 6.6 Lane Util. Factor..9...9...95...95. Frt...85...85...85...85 Flt Protected.95...95...95...95.. Satd. Flow (prot) 75 59 566 75 59 566 75 5 566 75 5 566 Flt Permitted.9......5..... Satd. Flow (perm) 7 59 566 59 566 97 5 566 7 5 566 Peak-hour factor, PHF............ Adj. Flow (vph) 59 95 7 79 4 55 77 74 7 6 79 45 RTOR Reduction (vph) 4 99 8 Lane Group Flow (vph) 59 95 5 79 4 4 77 74 7 6 79 Turn Type pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Perm Perm NA Perm pm+pt NA Perm Protected Phases 7 4 8 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8 6 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 8.8 7. 7. 44. 6.8 6.8 9.5 9.5 9.5 45. 45. 45. Effective Green, g (s) 8.8 7. 7. 44. 6.8 6.8 9.5 9.5 9.5 45. 45. 45. Actuated g/c Ratio.58.5.5..6.6...... Clearance Time (s) 6.6 6.6 6.6. 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6. 6.6 6.6 Vehicle Extension (s)............ Lane Grp Cap (vph) 5 56 798 46 4 5 78 9 5 5 v/s Ratio Prot c.7.8..6. c.9. v/s Ratio Perm c...4..8. c..9 v/c Ratio.97.75..54.99..8.98.5.99.4.7 Uniform Delay, d 4. 7. 6.9 4. 5.5 9. 47.4 55. 49. 9.8 6. 5. Progression Factor............ Incremental Delay, d... 4... 5. 8.8 5.9 57.7.8. Delay (s) 74. 8.6 6.9 8.4 74.6 9. 5.5 8.8 54.9 97.5 7. 6.5 Level of Service E C B D E D D F D F D D Approach Delay (s) 8. 69. 74. 49. Approach LOS D E E D Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 54. HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capacity ratio.9 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 4. Sum of lost time (s) 9.6 Intersection Capacity Utilization 5.4% ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period (min) 5 c Critical Lane Group 9-55 Bovaird Class EA Synchro 8 Report ENTRA Consultants Page 5

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis < without NSTC> AM Peak Hour : Lake Lousie Drive/Worthington Avenue & Bovaird Drive // Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 89 454 7 4 7 95 58 5 75 7 6 457 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 Total Lost time (s). 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.9 Lane Util. Factor..9..9..... Frpb, ped/bikes.....97..99..98 Flpb, ped/bikes........99. Frt.....85..9..86 Flt Protected.95..95...95..95. Satd. Flow (prot) 75 4746 78 489 4 78 685 76 75 Flt Permitted.4..7...5..68. Satd. Flow (perm) 56 4746 7 489 4 75 685 75 Peak-hour factor, PHF............ Adj. Flow (vph) 89 454 7 4 7 95 58 5 75 7 6 457 RTOR Reduction (vph) 9 8 Lane Group Flow (vph) 89 46 4 7 56 58 7 65 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 6 6 Heavy Vehicles (%) % 8% % % 6% % % % % % % 8% Turn Type pm+pt NA Perm NA Perm Perm NA Perm NA Protected Phases 5 6 4 8 Permitted Phases 6 6 4 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 55.6 55.6 7.5 7.5 7.5 7. 7. 7. 7. Effective Green, g (s) 55.6 55.6 7.5 7.5 7.5 7. 7. 7. 7. Actuated g/c Ratio.58.58.9.9.9.8.8.8.8 Clearance Time (s). 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.9 Vehicle Extension (s). 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. Lane Grp Cap (vph) 57 77 9 8 99 78 477 46 v/s Ratio Prot.9 c. c..6.4 v/s Ratio Perm..4.4. c. v/c Ratio.5.5.6.74.4.74..79.5 Uniform Delay, d.5.5 5.8. 5.6.4 6.4.9 8.8 Progression Factor......... Incremental Delay, d.4.7.6.7.7 6.6.5..4 Delay (s).9. 9.4 4.9 6.4 68. 6.9 44.9. Level of Service B B C C C E C D C Approach Delay (s)..5 9.9 6. Approach LOS B C D D Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 5.5 HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio.7 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 96.4 Sum of lost time (s). Intersection Capacity Utilization 9.% ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period (min) 5 c Critical Lane Group 9-55 Bovaird Class EA Synchro 8 Report ENTRA Consultants Page

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis < without NSTC> AM Peak Hour : Bovaird Drive & Ashby Field Road 4/7/ Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 57 57 49 4 75 7 69 68 6 6 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 Total Lost time (s) 6. 6. 6.. 6. 6. 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 Lane Util. Factor..9...9....97. Frpb, ped/bikes...98.....98..99 Flpb, ped/bikes.......99... Frt...85...85..89..9 Flt Protected.95...95...95..95. Satd. Flow (prot) 785 4885 5 785 49 597 69 65 46 7 Flt Permitted.8...9...74..95. Satd. Flow (perm) 4 4885 5 6 49 597 65 46 7 Peak-hour factor, PHF............ Adj. Flow (vph) 57 57 49 4 75 7 69 68 6 6 RTOR Reduction (vph) 6 95 76 Lane Group Flow (vph) 57 57 4 5 75 64 68 9 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 5 5 Heavy Vehicles (%) % 5% % % 4% % 5% % % % % % Turn Type Perm Perm pm+pt Perm Perm Prot Protected Phases 6 4 8 Permitted Phases 6 6 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 5.8 5.8 5.8 6.6 6.6 6.6.. 7. 5. Effective Green, g (s) 5.8 5.8 5.8 6.6 6.6 6.6.. 7. 5. Actuated g/c Ratio.48.48.48.57.57.57.9.9.6. Clearance Time (s) 6. 6. 6.. 6. 6. 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 Vehicle Extension (s) 5. 5. 5.. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. Lane Grp Cap (vph) 68 7 9 79 94 5 8 547 v/s Ratio Prot.. c.4. c.. v/s Ratio Perm c.4..7.8 c. v/c Ratio.84.67..5.7.4.69.5..5 Uniform Delay, d 5.. 5. 5. 7.7. 4.6 4. 49.4 6. Progression Factor.......... Incremental Delay, d 69.9.6..6.7...8.6. Delay (s) 95..8 5.4 7.7 9.4.6 5.7 4.8 5. 6. Level of Service F C B B B B D D D C Approach Delay (s) 6. 8.6 46.6 4. Approach LOS C B D D Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 4.4 HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio.79 Actuated Cycle Length (s).6 Sum of lost time (s) 5.8 Intersection Capacity Utilization 94.% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 5 c Critical Lane Group 9-55 Bovaird Class EA Synchro 7 - Report ENTRA Consultants Page

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis < without NSTC> AM Peak Hour : Bovaird Drive & Mississauga Road 4/7/ Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 8 5 456 697 4 7 9 9 59 5 89 85 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 Total Lost time (s). 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6. 6.6 6.6 Lane Util. Factor..9..97.9..97.9...9. Frt...85...85...85...85 Flt Protected.95...95...95...95.. Satd. Flow (prot) 55 4885 45 67 59 57 77 498 56 785 49 88 Flt Permitted.5...95...95...4.. Satd. Flow (perm) 5 4885 45 67 59 57 77 498 56 56 49 88 Peak-hour factor, PHF............ Adj. Flow (vph) 8 5 456 697 4 7 9 9 59 5 89 85 RTOR Reduction (vph) 5 4 77 Lane Group Flow (vph) 8 5 697 4 6 9 9 5 89 5 Heavy Vehicles (%) 5% 5% % 6% % 6% 9% % 4% % 4% 4% Turn Type pm+pt Perm Prot Perm Prot Perm pm+pt Perm Protected Phases 5 6 7 4 8 Permitted Phases 6 4 8 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 55. 4.4 4.4 7.4 6.6 6.6.4 7.7 7.7 8. 9.4 9.4 Effective Green, g (s) 55. 4.4 4.4 7.4 6.6 6.6.4 7.7 7.7 8. 9.4 9.4 Actuated g/c Ratio.9....45.45..7.7.7.. Clearance Time (s). 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6. 6.6 6.6 Vehicle Extension (s). 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5.. 5. 5. Lane Grp Cap (vph) 9 54 45 69 49 674 4 4 44 65 6 7 v/s Ratio Prot.6 c. c..8 c.9 c.6.4.8 v/s Ratio Perm...9.5..4 v/c Ratio.66.99.74.9.6..95.98.56.64.86.9 Uniform Delay, d 8.4 48. 4. 56. 9.8.5 6. 5.8 44. 4.4 5. 45.5 Progression Factor............ Incremental Delay, d 7.6.. 6.8.4.7 9.9.7.8 7.8 9..6 Delay (s) 6. 69. 5.4 9.. 4..9 7.6 46.9 49. 6.5 47. Level of Service D E D F C C F E D D E D Approach Delay (s) 6.6 57.5 69.9 6. Approach LOS E E E E Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 6. HCM Level of Service E HCM Volume to Capacity ratio.5 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 4. Sum of lost time (s) 6.4 Intersection Capacity Utilization.% ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period (min) 5 c Critical Lane Group 9-55 Bovaird Class EA Synchro 7 - Report ENTRA Consultants Page

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis < without NSTC> AM Peak Hour 4: Bovaird Drive & Heritage Road 4/7/ Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 4 457 8 7 875 8 9 8 4 9 99 9 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 Total Lost time (s). 7.4 7.4 7.4 7.4 7.4 6. 6. 6. 6. Lane Util. Factor..95...95...95..95 Frpb, ped/bikes..........99 Flpb, ped/bikes.......... Frt...85...85..98..95 Flt Protected.95...95...95..95. Satd. Flow (prot) 785 68 597 785 5 597 785 485 785 77 Flt Permitted.8...7...55..6. Satd. Flow (perm) 46 68 597 5 597 9 485 6 77 Peak-hour factor, PHF............ Adj. Flow (vph) 4 457 8 7 875 8 9 8 4 9 99 9 RTOR Reduction (vph) 9 9 9 64 Lane Group Flow (vph) 4 457 6 7 875 7 9 96 9 7 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 7 Heavy Vehicles (%) % 6% % % % % % % % % % % Turn Type pm+pt Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 5 6 4 8 Permitted Phases 6 6 4 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 58. 58. 58. 48.4 48.4 48.4.8.8.8.8 Effective Green, g (s) 58. 58. 58. 48.4 48.4 48.4.8.8.8.8 Actuated g/c Ratio.69.69.69.57.57.57.5.5.5.5 Clearance Time (s). 7.4 7.4 7.4 7.4 7.4 6. 6. 6. 6. Vehicle Extension (s). 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. Lane Grp Cap (vph) 6 98 85 5 95 57 58 76 5 v/s Ratio Prot.5 c.4 c.54.6 c.7 v/s Ratio Perm.7.4.6.4.. v/c Ratio.6.6.6.6.94.8.8.7..44 Uniform Delay, d 6. 7. 4.. 6.6 8....9.6 Progression Factor.......... Incremental Delay, d 4.8.. 5. 9.7...9.6. Delay (s). 8.6 4.4 7.4 6. 8..5..5.9 Level of Service C A A C C A C C C C Approach Delay (s) 9.4 5.7..7 Approach LOS A C C C Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay. HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio.87 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 84.5 Sum of lost time (s). Intersection Capacity Utilization 96.% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 5 c Critical Lane Group 9-55 Bovaird Class EA Synchro 7 - Report ENTRA Consultants Page 4

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis < without NSTC> AM Peak Hour 5: Bovaird Drive & Caseley Street 4/7/ Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Volume (veh/h) 7 477 5 Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade % % % Peak Hour Factor...... Hourly flow rate (vph) 7 477 5 Pedestrians Lane Width (m).5.5.5 Walking Speed (m/s)... Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (m) px, platoon unblocked vc, conflicting volume 86 864 88 vc, stage conf vol vc, stage conf vol vcu, unblocked vol 86 864 88 tc, single (s) 4. 6.4 6. tc, stage (s) tf (s)..5. p queue free % 98 cm capacity (veh/h) 7 4 656 Direction, Lane # EB WB NB Volume Total 74 477 7 Volume Left 5 Volume Right csh 7 7 79 Volume to Capacity... Queue Length 95th (m)...4 Control Delay (s).. 4.7 Lane LOS B Approach Delay (s).. 4.7 Approach LOS B Intersection Summary Average Delay. Intersection Capacity Utilization 6.% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 5 9-55 Bovaird Class EA Synchro 7 - Report ENTRA Consultants Page 5

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis < without NSTC> AM Peak Hour : James Potter Road/Creditview Road & Bovaird Drive // Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 69 4 4 67 64 59 6 66 86 69 977 45 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 Total Lost time (s). 6. 6.. 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6. 6.6 6.6 Lane Util. Factor..9...9...95...95. Frt...85...85...85...85 Flt Protected.95...95...95...95.. Satd. Flow (prot) 75 59 566 75 59 566 75 5 566 75 5 566 Flt Permitted..........7.. Satd. Flow (perm) 99 59 566 59 566 6 5 566 5 5 566 Peak-hour factor, PHF............ Adj. Flow (vph) 69 4 4 67 64 59 6 66 86 69 977 45 RTOR Reduction (vph) 48 6 7 6 Lane Group Flow (vph) 69 4 56 67 64 6 66 6 69 977 5 Turn Type pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Perm Perm NA Perm pm+pt NA Perm Protected Phases 7 4 8 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8 6 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 67. 4.6 4.6 54.8.4.4.4.4.4.4.4.4 Effective Green, g (s) 67. 4.6 4.6 54.8.4.4.4.4.4.4.4.4 Actuated g/c Ratio.6.9.9.5...9.9.9.8.8.8 Clearance Time (s). 6. 6.. 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6. 6.6 6.6 Vehicle Extension (s)............ Lane Grp Cap (vph) 544 948 66 48 57 475 67 649 9 78 967 4 v/s Ratio Prot c..8.8..9.6 c.8 v/s Ratio Perm c.9.4.7.5....8 v/c Ratio.6.74.9.9.6.49.9..5.95..9 Uniform Delay, d.6 8.9.4 9.4 8.. 7. 44.8 6.9 6. 9.8. Progression Factor............ Incremental Delay, d 89.5.5..9 4..8.6 9.6.4 5..5.7 Delay (s)...5 5. 8.. 9.7 84.4 7. 88. 7.. Level of Service F C C D F C D F D F E C Approach Delay (s) 56.6 68.4 78.7 6. Approach LOS E E E E Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 64.4 HCM Level of Service E HCM Volume to Capacity ratio.7 Actuated Cycle Length (s). Sum of lost time (s) 9.6 Intersection Capacity Utilization 6.4% ICU Level of Service H Analysis Period (min) 5 c Critical Lane Group 9-55 Bovaird Class EA Synchro 8 Report ENTRA Consultants Page

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis <> PM Peak Hour without NSTC (Single WB Left) : Lake Lousie Drive/Worthington Avenue & Bovaird Drive // Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 457 7 58 75 454 7 7 6 4 95 5 89 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 Total Lost time (s). 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.9 Lane Util. Factor..9..9..... Frpb, ped/bikes.....97..99..99 Flpb, ped/bikes........99. Frt..99...85..96..88 Flt Protected.95..95...95..95. Satd. Flow (prot) 75 476 78 489 99 777 787 7 48 Flt Permitted.8..5...4..7. Satd. Flow (perm) 5 476 47 489 99 795 787 4 48 Peak-hour factor, PHF............ Adj. Flow (vph) 457 7 58 75 454 7 7 6 4 95 5 89 RTOR Reduction (vph) 4 64 Lane Group Flow (vph) 457 8 75 454 9 7 9 95 9 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 6 6 Heavy Vehicles (%) % 8% % % 6% % % % % % % 8% Turn Type pm+pt NA Perm NA Perm Perm NA Perm NA Protected Phases 5 6 4 8 Permitted Phases 6 6 4 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 77.6 77.6 45.8 45.8 45.8.... Effective Green, g (s) 77.6 77.6 45.8 45.8 45.8.... Actuated g/c Ratio.68.68.4.4.4.... Clearance Time (s). 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.9 Vehicle Extension (s). 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. Lane Grp Cap (vph) 56 89 99 56 6 6 65 5 v/s Ratio Prot c..... v/s Ratio Perm c.9.6.8. c.5 v/c Ratio.9.4.4.75.9.4..74.47 Uniform Delay, d.5 7.6 4.4 9.. 6.6 7. 4.7 4. Progression Factor......... Incremental Delay, d 9.. 6..7.8....9 Delay (s) 5.8 7.9.5.. 6.9 7.4 54.9 4. Level of Service D A C C C D D D D Approach Delay (s).9.6 7. 48.4 Approach LOS C C D D Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 8.8 HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio.8 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 4. Sum of lost time (s) 9.9 Intersection Capacity Utilization 86.7% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 5 c Critical Lane Group 9-55 Bovaird Class EA Synchro 8 Report ENTRA Consultants Page

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis PM Peak without NSTC(Single WB Left) : Bovaird Drive & Ashby Field Road /4/ Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 6 4 75 69 57 68 49 6 7 57 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 Total Lost time (s) 6. 6. 6.. 6. 6. 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 Lane Util. Factor..9...9....97. Frpb, ped/bikes...98.....98..99 Flpb, ped/bikes.......... Frt...85...85..87..9 Flt Protected.95...95...95..95. Satd. Flow (prot) 785 4885 5 785 49 597 69 6 46 74 Flt Permitted.4...7...67..95. Satd. Flow (perm) 67 4885 5 7 49 597 6 46 74 Peak-hour factor, PHF............ Adj. Flow (vph) 6 4 75 69 57 68 49 6 7 57 RTOR Reduction (vph) 78 7 9 Lane Group Flow (vph) 6 4 97 69 57 4 49 7 6 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 5 5 Heavy Vehicles (%) % 5% % % 4% % 5% % % % % % Turn Type Perm Perm pm+pt Perm Perm Prot Protected Phases 6 4 8 Permitted Phases 6 6 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 5.8 5.8 5.8 6.8 6.8 6.8.5.5 9.4 7.6 Effective Green, g (s) 5.8 5.8 5.8 6.8 6.8 6.8.5.5 9.4 7.6 Actuated g/c Ratio.5.5.5.6.6.6...9.7 Clearance Time (s) 6. 6. 6.. 6. 6. 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 Vehicle Extension (s) 5. 5. 5.. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. Lane Grp Cap (vph) 5 474 775 96 979 965 5 8 8 469 v/s Ratio Prot.4 c.6.. c.6.7 v/s Ratio Perm.6.6 c.46. c.4 v/c Ratio..8..86.5.4.6.5.69.5 Uniform Delay, d..4...8 8. 4. 4. 45. 9. Progression Factor.......... Incremental Delay, d.8....7..5.8 8..6 Delay (s) 5. 4.6.6 5..4 8. 45.5 4.8 5. 9.8 Level of Service B C B D B A D D D C Approach Delay (s).7 6. 4.9 44.5 Approach LOS C B D D Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay. HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio.74 Actuated Cycle Length (s). Sum of lost time (s) 6.4 Intersection Capacity Utilization 88.% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 5 c Critical Lane Group Bovaird Class EA Synchro 7 - Report ENTRA Consultants Page

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis PM Peak without NSTC(Single WB Left) : Bovaird Drive & Mississauga Road /4/ Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 85 4 9 59 5 5 456 89 697 7 9 8 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 Total Lost time (s). 6.6 6.6. 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 Lane Util. Factor..9...9..97.9...9. Frt...85...85...85...85 Flt Protected.95...95...95...95.. Satd. Flow (prot) 55 4885 45 684 59 57 77 498 56 785 49 88 Flt Permitted....7...95..... Satd. Flow (perm) 9 4885 45 59 57 77 498 56 578 49 88 Peak-hour factor, PHF............ Adj. Flow (vph) 85 4 9 59 5 5 456 89 697 7 9 8 RTOR Reduction (vph) 64 4 8 66 Lane Group Flow (vph) 85 4 6 59 5 6 456 89 56 7 9 7 Heavy Vehicles (%) 5% 5% % 6% % 6% 9% % 4% % 4% 4% Turn Type pm+pt Perm pm+pt Perm Prot Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 5 6 7 4 8 Permitted Phases 6 6 4 8 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 6.6 5.5 5.5 76.5 64.4 64.4 4.4 5. 5. 9. 9. 9. Effective Green, g (s) 6.6 5.5 5.5 76.5 64.4 64.4 4.4 5. 5. 9. 9. 9. Actuated g/c Ratio.44.8.8.55.46.46..6.6... Clearance Time (s). 6.6 6.6. 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 Vehicle Extension (s). 5. 5. 5. 5. 5.. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. Lane Grp Cap (vph) 7 8 545 5 69 7 789 55 7 v/s Ratio Prot..9 c.5. c.4.8.7 v/s Ratio Perm.8.9 c.66.4.4 c.9.6 v/c Ratio.49.78..67.65.9.9.5.9.4.8.7 Uniform Delay, d 4.4 8.5 9.9 44.7 9.. 6.8 5. 4. 55.4 55.4 46.4 Progression Factor............ Incremental Delay, d... 5..4. 95..5.8 4..7.4 Delay (s) 6.6 4.8.9 59.8.5.6 58. 5.4 67. 79.5 88. 48.8 Level of Service C D C F C C F D E F F D Approach Delay (s) 9. 9. 95.9 85.8 Approach LOS D F F F Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 5.6 HCM Level of Service F HCM Volume to Capacity ratio.5 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 4. Sum of lost time (s) 6. Intersection Capacity Utilization 4.% ICU Level of Service H Analysis Period (min) 5 c Critical Lane Group Bovaird Class EA Synchro 7 - Report ENTRA Consultants Page

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis PM Peak without NSTC(Single WB Left) 4: Bovaird Drive & Heritage Road /4/ Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 9 875 9 4 457 9 8 99 7 8 8 4 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 Total Lost time (s) 7.4 7.4 7.4 7.4 7.4 7.4 6. 6. 6. 6. Lane Util. Factor..95...95...95..95 Frpb, ped/bikes..........99 Flpb, ped/bikes.......... Frt...85...85..94..9 Flt Protected.95...95...95..95. Satd. Flow (prot) 785 68 597 785 5 597 785 7 785 Flt Permitted....8...5..54. Satd. Flow (perm) 5 68 597 4 5 597 994 7 Peak-hour factor, PHF............ Adj. Flow (vph) 9 875 9 4 457 9 8 99 7 8 8 4 RTOR Reduction (vph) 5 4 4 Lane Group Flow (vph) 9 875 4 4 457 5 8 4 8 88 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 7 Heavy Vehicles (%) % 6% % % % % % % % % % % Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 6 4 8 Permitted Phases 6 6 4 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. Effective Green, g (s) 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. Actuated g/c Ratio.65.65.65.65.65.65.9.9.9.9 Clearance Time (s) 7.4 7.4 7.4 7.4 7.4 7.4 6. 6. 6. 6. Vehicle Extension (s) 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. Lane Grp Cap (vph) 6 87 7 9 7 7 84 64 87 6 v/s Ratio Prot c.56.4 c.9.9 v/s Ratio Perm.7..4..8.8 v/c Ratio.56.86..7.64..45.49.4.47 Uniform Delay, d 8..4 5. 6.6 8.7 5. 9.7. 9.6 9.9 Progression Factor.......... Incremental Delay, d.4 4.6...4..6... Delay (s).4 6. 5. 7.7. 5....9. Level of Service C B A B B A C C C C Approach Delay (s) 6...6.4 Approach LOS B B C C Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 6.9 HCM Level of Service B HCM Volume to Capacity ratio.78 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 8. Sum of lost time (s).6 Intersection Capacity Utilization 5.% ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period (min) 5 c Critical Lane Group Bovaird Class EA Synchro 7 - Report ENTRA Consultants Page 4

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis PM Peak without NSTC(Single WB Left) 5: Bovaird Drive & Caseley Street /4/ Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Volume (veh/h) 477 5 7 Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade % % % Peak Hour Factor...... Hourly flow rate (vph) 477 5 7 Pedestrians Lane Width (m).5.5.5 Walking Speed (m/s)... Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (m) px, platoon unblocked vc, conflicting volume 494 87 494 vc, stage conf vol vc, stage conf vol vcu, unblocked vol 494 87 494 tc, single (s) 4. 6.4 6. tc, stage (s) tf (s)..5. p queue free % cm capacity (veh/h) 7 57 Direction, Lane # EB WB NB Volume Total 48 75 Volume Left Volume Right 5 csh 7 7 Volume to Capacity.8.. Queue Length 95th (m)... Control Delay (s).. 6. Lane LOS A C Approach Delay (s).. 6. Approach LOS C Intersection Summary Average Delay. Intersection Capacity Utilization 6.4% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 5 Bovaird Class EA Synchro 7 - Report ENTRA Consultants Page 5

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis PM Peak without NSTC(Double WB Left) : Bovaird Drive & Mississauga Road /4/ Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 85 4 9 59 5 5 456 89 697 7 9 8 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 Total Lost time (s). 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 Lane Util. Factor..9..97.9..97.9...9. Frt...85...85...85...85 Flt Protected.95...95...95...95.. Satd. Flow (prot) 55 4885 45 67 59 57 77 498 56 785 49 88 Flt Permitted....95...95..... Satd. Flow (perm) 76 4885 45 67 59 57 77 498 56 578 49 88 Peak-hour factor, PHF............ Adj. Flow (vph) 85 4 9 59 5 5 456 89 697 7 9 8 RTOR Reduction (vph) 77 4 65 Lane Group Flow (vph) 85 4 59 5 6 456 89 577 7 9 7 Heavy Vehicles (%) 5% 5% % 6% % 6% 9% % 4% % 4% 4% Turn Type pm+pt Perm Prot Perm Prot Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 5 6 7 4 8 Permitted Phases 6 4 8 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 6.5 54.6 54.6 4. 6.4 6.4 5.9 5.5 5.5 9. 9. 9. Effective Green, g (s) 6.5 54.6 54.6 4. 6.4 6.4 5.9 5.5 5.5 9. 9. 9. Actuated g/c Ratio.45.9.9..45.45..7.7... Clearance Time (s). 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 Vehicle Extension (s). 5. 5. 5. 5. 5.. 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. Lane Grp Cap (vph) 67 95 566 9 77 68 6 8 565 67 v/s Ratio Prot. c.9 c.6..4.8.7 v/s Ratio Perm..8.4 c.8 c.9.6 v/c Ratio.5.75..55.66.9.6.49..4.9.7 Uniform Delay, d.9 6.7 8. 6. 9.9.9 6. 4. 44. 55.5 55.5 46.6 Progression Factor............ Incremental Delay, d.4.7.8 6.8.5. 8.8.4 4. 9. 8..5 Delay (s) 6. 9.4 9..8.4..9 4.5 87.5 84.7 9.7 49. Level of Service C D C F C C F C F F F D Approach Delay (s) 7.. 89.7 9.9 Approach LOS D F F F Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay. HCM Level of Service F HCM Volume to Capacity ratio.9 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 4. Sum of lost time (s) 6.4 Intersection Capacity Utilization.5% ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period (min) 5 c Critical Lane Group Bovaird Class EA Synchro 7 - Report ENTRA Consultants Page

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis <> PM Peak Hour without NSTC (Single WB Left) : James Potter Road/Creditview Road & Bovaird Drive // Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 45 64 6 86 4 69 4 977 67 59 66 69 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 Total Lost time (s). 6. 6. 6. 6.6 6.6 4.6 4.6 4.6. 6.6 6.6 Lane Util. Factor..9...9...95...95. Frt...85...85...85...85 Flt Protected.95...95...95...95.. Satd. Flow (prot) 75 59 566 75 59 566 75 5 566 75 5 566 Flt Permitted....4...4..... Satd. Flow (perm) 59 566 49 59 566 78 5 566 7 5 566 Peak-hour factor, PHF............ Adj. Flow (vph) 45 64 6 86 4 69 4 977 67 59 66 69 RTOR Reduction (vph) 4 8 Lane Group Flow (vph) 45 64 4 86 4 45 4 977 84 59 66 49 Turn Type pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Perm Perm NA Perm pm+pt NA Perm Protected Phases 7 4 8 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8 6 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 5. 4. 4..6 9.6 9.6.4.4.4 46.4 46.4 46.4 Effective Green, g (s) 5. 4. 4..6 9.6 9.6.4.4.4 46.4 46.4 46.4 Actuated g/c Ratio.47.8.8..7.7.8.8.8.4.4.4 Clearance Time (s). 6. 6. 6. 6.6 6.6 4.6 4.6 4.6. 6.6 6.6 Vehicle Extension (s)............ Lane Grp Cap (vph) 65 98 594 9 9 47 8 988 44 86 46 65 v/s Ratio Prot c....8.8 c.6.9 v/s Ratio Perm c.7..8..4.8 c.6.7 v/c Ratio.4.85..67.7..5.99.64.6.45.66 Uniform Delay, d..6.5 9.9 4.8.8. 9.7 5..5. 6. Progression Factor............ Incremental Delay, d 7.5.9.. 45.5. 8. 6. 7. 4.. 5. Delay (s) 6.8 5.5.5 4. 86..9 4.7 65.8 4. 7.7 4.. Level of Service F D C D F C D E D F C C Approach Delay (s) 6.6 78.5 58. 59. Approach LOS E E E E Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 64.7 HCM Level of Service E HCM Volume to Capacity ratio.6 Actuated Cycle Length (s). Sum of lost time (s) 6. Intersection Capacity Utilization 5.6% ICU Level of Service H Analysis Period (min) 5 c Critical Lane Group 9-55 Bovaird Class EA Synchro 8 Report ENTRA Consultants Page

Queue Summary Excellence in Transportation Planning

Existing Queues Excellence in Transportation Planning

Queuing and Blocking Report <Existing> AM Peak Hour // Intersection: : Lake Lousie Drive/Worthington Avenue & Bovaird Drive Movement EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB NB NB SB SB Directions Served L T T TR L T T T L TR L TR Maximum Queue (m).8 44.9 4.6 4.6 8. 4.5 5.9 4. 7. 54.6 7.8 75.8 Average Queue (m) 4.6 8.5.4 7. 4. 7.5.7 4. 7.8 9.8 57.6 85. 95th Queue (m) 5. 4. 4.4 44.. 45.7 5.5.5 9.6 44. 8. 7.4 Link Distance (m) 9.8 9.8 9.8 5. 5. 5. 88.6 96.6 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (m). 9. 5. 5. Storage Blk Time (%) 9 Queuing Penalty (veh) 64 56 9-55 Bovaird Class EA SimTraffic Report ENTRA Consultants Page

Queuing and Blocking Report <Existing> AM Peak Hour /4/ Intersection: : Bovaird Drive & Ashby Field Road Movement EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB NB NB SB SB Directions Served L T T R L T T R L TR L L Maximum Queue (m).6 6. 59.5 7.6 9.9 65. 4.9 4.. 6.4 4. 8.8 Average Queue (m) 4.9..7.7 6. 49.7.6 8.8.4..8.4 95th Queue (m) 4.9 7. 7.6 9.4 4. 77. 48.7 8. 5. 7. 6.6.6 Link Distance (m) 85.4 85.4 46. 46. 9. Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (m) 48. 9... 75... Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: : Bovaird Drive & Ashby Field Road Movement SB Directions Served TR Maximum Queue (m). Average Queue (m) 4. 95th Queue (m) 4.6 Link Distance (m) 7. Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (m) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: : Bovaird Drive & Mississauga Road Movement EB EB EB WB WB NB NB SB SB Directions Served L T R L TR L TR L TR Maximum Queue (m) 5.9 64.8 94.5.9 86.5 9. 57. 4.9 5.6 Average Queue (m) 4.7..7 7. 6.6 4. 4. 6.5 7.5 95th Queue (m) 6. 9.7..6 5.5.9 6.8 5.5 95.8 Link Distance (m) 464. 697. 4. 58. Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (m).. 6. 6. 8. Storage Blk Time (%) 49 7 7 7 6 Queuing Penalty (veh) 4 8 7 6 4 9-55 Bovaird Class EA SimTraffic Report ENTRA Consultants Page

Queuing and Blocking Report <Existing> AM Peak Hour /4/ Intersection: 4: Bovaird Drive & Heritage Road Movement EB EB EB WB WB NB SB Directions Served L T R L T LTR LTR Maximum Queue (m). 4. 7..4 57...7 Average Queue (m) 4. 79.7.. 7. 5.. 95th Queue (m).4 49.6 8.4.6 67.7.9 5.7 Link Distance (m) 95.4 48. 5.8 46.6 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (m) 5.. 55. Storage Blk Time (%) 5 9 Queuing Penalty (veh) 8 9 5 Intersection: 5: Bovaird Drive & Caseley Street Movement EB WB NB Directions Served TR LT LR Maximum Queue (m) 5... Average Queue (m)..7 5.4 95th Queue (m) 7. 7. 4.5 Link Distance (m) 6. 9. 9. Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (m) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 58 9-55 Bovaird Class EA SimTraffic Report ENTRA Consultants Page

Queuing and Blocking Report <Existing> Midday Peak Hour // Intersection: : Lake Lousie Drive/Worthington Avenue & Bovaird Drive Movement EB EB EB EB WB WB WB NB NB SB SB Directions Served L T T TR L T T L TR L TR Maximum Queue (m) 4.. 5.9 4.5. 7.8 54. 7.8. 47.6.8 Average Queue (m).4 8.7 4.4 8.4 9. 9. 7.8 9. 5. 4.9 7.5 95th Queue (m) 9..9.4 9.8 9. 7.9 44.7.5 5. 44. 8.7 Link Distance (m) 9.8 9.8 9.8 5. 5. 88.6 96.6 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (m). 9. 5. 5. Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) 9-55 Bovaird Class EA SimTraffic Report ENTRA Consultants Page

Queuing and Blocking Report <Existing> Midday Peak Hour /4/ Intersection: : Bovaird Drive & Ashby Field Road Movement EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB NB NB SB SB Directions Served L T T R L T T R L TR L L Maximum Queue (m) 8. 8..8 8.9 4. 54.4 4.4.4 4.4..9 5. Average Queue (m).9. 7..8 7.6 7.8..6 6. 5..6. 95th Queue (m) 9.5.7 5.5 9.9 7. 57.4 5.4.7 6.8..8 7. Link Distance (m) 85.4 85.4 46. 46. 9. Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (m) 48. 9... 75... Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: : Bovaird Drive & Ashby Field Road Movement SB Directions Served TR Maximum Queue (m) 5. Average Queue (m).7 95th Queue (m) 7. Link Distance (m) 7. Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (m) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: : Bovaird Drive & Mississauga Road Movement EB EB EB WB WB NB NB SB SB Directions Served L T R L TR L TR L TR Maximum Queue (m) 6. 8.6.8 4.6 6.8. 5.. 5.5 Average Queue (m) 4.6 5.7 5.5 6. 4.9 5.8. 4.7 9. 95th Queue (m) 8.9 9.4. 47.8 7. 9. 4. 4.5 4.5 Link Distance (m) 464. 697. 4. 58. Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (m).. 6. 6. 8. Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) 7 9-55 Bovaird Class EA SimTraffic Report ENTRA Consultants Page

Queuing and Blocking Report <Existing> Midday Peak Hour /4/ Intersection: 4: Bovaird Drive & Heritage Road Movement EB EB EB WB WB NB SB Directions Served L T R L T LTR LTR Maximum Queue (m).6.5. 6.4.9 8.7. Average Queue (m).5..6..6.7 4.7 95th Queue (m).5 4.9 4. 7.4 6..7.8 Link Distance (m) 95.4 48. 5.8 46.6 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (m) 5.. 55. Storage Blk Time (%) 8 Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 5: Bovaird Drive & Caseley Street Movement EB WB NB Directions Served TR LT LR Maximum Queue (m) 6. 6.8.5 Average Queue (m)..7 5.7 95th Queue (m) 8.8 8.5 6.4 Link Distance (m) 5.4 9. 9. Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (m) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 9-55 Bovaird Class EA SimTraffic Report ENTRA Consultants Page

Queuing and Blocking Report <Existing> PM Peak Hour // Intersection: : Lake Lousie Drive/Worthington Avenue & Bovaird Drive Movement EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB WB NB NB SB Directions Served L T T TR L T T T R L TR L Maximum Queue (m) 64.5 47.9 5.7 9.. 6.4 65.4 46.9 6. 9. 7. 64. Average Queue (m) 88.6 8.7.7 9. 8.8 8.9 4.8.6 4.4. 8.6.7 95th Queue (m) 67.4 76..7 5.7.8 56. 6.9 9.8. 6.. 56. Link Distance (m) 9.8 9.8 9.8 5. 5. 5. 88.6 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (m). 9. 9. 5. 5. Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) 7 Intersection: : Lake Lousie Drive/Worthington Avenue & Bovaird Drive Movement SB Directions Served TR Maximum Queue (m) 97. Average Queue (m) 9. 95th Queue (m) 84.5 Link Distance (m) 96.6 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (m) Storage Blk Time (%) 5 Queuing Penalty (veh) 7 Bovaird Class EA SimTraffic Report ENTRA Consultants Page

Queuing and Blocking Report <Existing> PM Peak Hour /4/ Intersection: : Bovaird Drive & Ashby Field Road Movement EB EB EB WB WB WB WB B5 NB NB SB SB Directions Served T T R L T T R T L TR L L Maximum Queue (m) 48. 5.7 9.6. 9.4 6. 8. 6. 6.7. 6.8. Average Queue (m) 4.9 5.8 5.7 4. 67. 9.9.9.4 8.5 7.8. 5. 95th Queue (m) 59. 6.8.6.7.5 87.4 7.6.9 9.9 4.5 9.9.6 Link Distance (m) 85.4 85.4 46. 46. 9.5 9. Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (m) 9... 75... Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: : Bovaird Drive & Ashby Field Road Movement SB Directions Served TR Maximum Queue (m) 7.8 Average Queue (m) 9.4 95th Queue (m).9 Link Distance (m) 7. Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (m) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: : Bovaird Drive & Mississauga Road Movement EB EB EB WB WB B4 B4 NB NB SB SB Directions Served L T R L TR T L TR L TR Maximum Queue (m).6. 6.. 8. 68. 9. 8.8 4.. 59.7 Average Queue (m) 8.4 97.5.4 58.5 7..6 5.8 68.4 5.9 4.5.7 95th Queue (m) 8.9 54..7. 4. 9. 5. 47. 5. 4. 64.7 Link Distance (m) 464. 697. 85.4 85.4 4. 58. Upstream Blk Time (%) 9 Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (m).. 6. 6. 8. Storage Blk Time (%) 48 4 7 6 57 Queuing Penalty (veh) 58 6 6 6 Bovaird Class EA SimTraffic Report ENTRA Consultants Page

Queuing and Blocking Report <Existing> PM Peak Hour /4/ Intersection: 4: Bovaird Drive & Heritage Road Movement EB EB EB WB WB WB NB SB Directions Served L T R L T R LTR LTR Maximum Queue (m) 7. 6..4 5.4 9.5. 5. 9.4 Average Queue (m). 7.7.. 5..8 4.7 4. 95th Queue (m) 8.7 69..6 5. 6.9 4.6 57.5.4 Link Distance (m) 95.4 48. 5.8 46.6 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (m) 5.. 55. 5. Storage Blk Time (%) 9 9 Queuing Penalty (veh) 6 6 Intersection: 5: Bovaird Drive & Caseley Street Movement WB NB Directions Served LT LR Maximum Queue (m)..7 Average Queue (m).7. 95th Queue (m) 5.9. Link Distance (m) 9. 9. Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (m) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 594 Bovaird Class EA SimTraffic Report ENTRA Consultants Page

Queues Excellence in Transportation Planning

Queuing and Blocking Report <> AM Peak Hour // Intersection: : Lake Lousie Drive/Worthington Avenue & Bovaird Drive Movement EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB WB NB NB SB Directions Served L T T TR L T T T R L TR L Maximum Queue (m) 7.7 7.4 8.6.7 4. 67.9 7. 7.5. 8.4 4. 7.9 Average Queue (m).6 5.7 4. 47.5. 4.4 45.6 45.. 9.9.5 59. 95th Queue (m) 48.4 7.8 8. 9.. 64. 66.6 7.6 9.9. 8.7 84. Link Distance (m) 9.8 9.8 9.8 5. 5. 5. 88.6 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (m). 9. 9. 5. 5. Storage Blk Time (%) 9 Queuing Penalty (veh) 9 Intersection: : Lake Lousie Drive/Worthington Avenue & Bovaird Drive Movement SB Directions Served TR Maximum Queue (m) 8.5 Average Queue (m) 9.5 95th Queue (m) 55. Link Distance (m) 96.6 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (m) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) 74 9-55 Bovaird Class EA SimTraffic Report ENTRA Consultants Page

Queuing and Blocking Report <> AM Peak Hour 4/6/ Intersection: : Bovaird Drive & Ashby Field Road Movement EB EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB WB NB NB Directions Served L T T T R L T T T R L TR Maximum Queue (m). 56.7 5. 5.7 7.8. 7.9 7.8.9 49. 4.6 9.5 Average Queue (m) 9.5 7....5 9.5 4.7 6.8 47. 86..7.5 95th Queue (m). 47.7 46. 5. 8.4 9.5 75.7 74.. 89.9 4. 65.9 Link Distance (m) 85. 85. 85. 46. 46. 46. 89.6 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (m) 48. 9... 75. Storage Blk Time (%) 8 54 Queuing Penalty (veh) 4 8 Intersection: : Bovaird Drive & Ashby Field Road Movement SB SB SB Directions Served L L TR Maximum Queue (m) 9. 5.8 8.4 Average Queue (m) 6. 5..6 95th Queue (m) 5..5 6. Link Distance (m).5 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (m) 7. 7. Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) 9-55 Bovaird Class EA SimTraffic Report ENTRA Consultants Page

Queues <> AM Peak Hour : Bovaird Drive & Ashby Field Road 5// Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 5 4 44 9 84 99 59 7 6 9 v/c Ratio.64.57.5.9.64..65.56..6 Control Delay 65.5.4 5.9 6. 8.5.5 5.9 8. 5.7 9.7 Queue Delay.......... Total Delay 65.5.4 5.9 6. 8.5.5 5.9 8. 5.7 9.7 Queue Length 5th (m) 8.7 8.. 8. 98....8 6.5. Queue Length 95th (m) #4.5.8 6.8 8. 6.. 54. 47. 4. 9. Internal Link Dist (m) 76. 7. 8.8 97.9 Turn Bay Length (m) 48. 9... 75. 7. Base Capacity (vph) 8 487 8 8 86 9 59 5 5 79 Starvation Cap Reductn Spillback Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn Reduced v/c Ratio.64.57.5.8.64..44.4..4 Intersection Summary # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. 9-55 Bovaird Class EA Synchro 7 - Report ENTRA Consultants Page

Queuing and Blocking Report <> AM Peak Hour 4/6/ Intersection: : Bovaird Drive & Mississauga Road Movement EB EB EB EB EB B5 B5 B5 WB WB WB WB Directions Served L T T T R T T T L T T T Maximum Queue (m) 9.7 476.7 476. 47...5 7. 76.7 9.9 47. 7. 47. Average Queue (m) 4. 77.6 8.4 95. 9.9. 6.9 8.6 95. 9.6. 66. 95th Queue (m).8 55.8 57. 5.5 7.6 5.4 8.7 45.5 47. 45.7 77. 5.6 Link Distance (m) 456. 456. 456. 469. 469. 469. 688.8 688.8 688.8 Upstream Blk Time (%) 5 8 Queuing Penalty (veh) 7 Storage Bay Dist (m) 5. 4. 5. Storage Blk Time (%) 68 69 6 55 Queuing Penalty (veh) 77 59 4 77 Intersection: : Bovaird Drive & Mississauga Road Movement WB NB NB NB NB NB SB SB SB SB SB Directions Served R L T T T R L T T T R Maximum Queue (m) 48.9 85. 4. 49.8 98.8 6. 77.8 6.5 69.6 78..8 Average Queue (m) 4.6 58.4 68.5 79. 97..5 47. 4. 47. 5.5 8.6 95th Queue (m).5.4 47.4 4.8 5. 58.9 7.9 65.5 7. 7.. Link Distance (m) 95. 95. 95. 46.8 46.8 46.8 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (m) 5. 5.. 5.. Storage Blk Time (%) 76 8 Queuing Penalty (veh) 8 75 48 7 9-55 Bovaird Class EA SimTraffic Report ENTRA Consultants Page

Queues <> AM Peak Hour : Bovaird Drive & Mississauga Road 5// Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Group Flow (vph) 74 57 65 9 8 8 48 86 7 7 v/c Ratio.5..7..5..94.6.5.8.6. Control Delay 5. 78. 7.7 6.7 6.. 7.5.9 5. 9.7 4.6 5. Queue Delay............ Total Delay 5. 78. 7.7 6.7 6.. 7.5.9 5. 9.7 4.6 5. Queue Length 5th (m).8 ~.5 6.9 ~8. 7.8 9. 4. 76.5. 9. 56.. Queue Length 95th (m).8 #4.4 7.7 #5.9 87..8 #86.5 9.4.8 #48.8 69.6 5. Internal Link Dist (m) 454.4 686. 9. 4. Turn Bay Length (m) 5. 4. 5. 5. 5.. 5.. Base Capacity (vph) 97 5 54 98 7 54 76 8 7 8 55 Starvation Cap Reductn Spillback Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn Reduced v/c Ratio.48..7..5..94.6.5.8.6. Intersection Summary ~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. 9-55 Bovaird Class EA Synchro 7 - Report ENTRA Consultants Page

Queuing and Blocking Report <> AM Peak Hour 4/6/ Intersection: 4: Bovaird Drive & Heritage Road Movement EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB NB NB NB SB Directions Served L T T R L T T R L T TR L Maximum Queue (m) 45.5 464.4 464.4 5.5 45. 77.9 5. 9. 4.7.9. 7.7 Average Queue (m) 8.6 9.6 68. 4.8 5.5 6.5 44.6 5.6 5..4 5.9.5 95th Queue (m) 6. 4.8 44.6.4 4.7 64. 86.9..8.8 7.6 8. Link Distance (m) 99.6 99.6 4.6 4.6 57.6 57.6 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (m) 5.. 55. 5... Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) 8 4 Intersection: 4: Bovaird Drive & Heritage Road Movement SB SB Directions Served T TR Maximum Queue (m) 6.6.9 Average Queue (m) 5.4.6 95th Queue (m) 4.4. Link Distance (m) 4.4 4.4 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (m) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 5: Bovaird Drive & Caseley Street Movement B B NB Directions Served T LR Maximum Queue (m) 85.9 47.7 8.4 Average Queue (m).4 9.8. 95th Queue (m) 88.9 7.7 5.6 Link Distance (m) 99.6 99.6 9. Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (m) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 477 9-55 Bovaird Class EA SimTraffic Report ENTRA Consultants Page 4

Queuing and Blocking Report <> AM Peak Hour /4/ Intersection: : James Potter Road/Creditview Road & Bovaird Drive Movement EB EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB WB NB NB Directions Served L T T T R L T T T R L T Maximum Queue (m) 54.5 7.9 89.4 97. 4.7 8.5 55. 5.6.8 8.4 7. 5.4 Average Queue (m) 7.6 6. 4. 5.4. 4.9 85.6 74.9 7.5.4. 6.9 95th Queue (m) 49. 74.8 8.6 9.5.5 6.5 4.6 7.5 6. 48. 4.7 7.6 Link Distance (m) 47. 47. 47. 448. 448. 448..8 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (m) 7. 8.. 7. 4. Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) 9 9 Intersection: : James Potter Road/Creditview Road & Bovaird Drive Movement NB NB SB SB SB SB Directions Served T R L T T R Maximum Queue (m) 8..4 7.5 8.6 9.6 5. Average Queue (m) 9.4.4.. 4. 44. 95th Queue (m) 7.6 8. 5. 5. 8.9 9.5 Link Distance (m).8 9. 9. Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (m) 55. 8.. Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) 9-55 Bovaird Class EA SimTraffic Report ENTRA Consultants Page

Queuing and Blocking Report <> PM Peak Hour // Intersection: : Lake Lousie Drive/Worthington Avenue & Bovaird Drive Movement EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB WB NB NB SB Directions Served L T T TR L T T T R L TR L Maximum Queue (m) 5.8 5.9 4.8 5.9.9 9.6 96..6 55. 8.6 5.7 64.7 Average Queue (m) 5..6 5.6 5.4.7 6.7 6.9 6..4.9 8.4 8.4 95th Queue (m) 96.5 4.4 8.5 47.7 7.6 87.5 9.8 98.7 4.7 4.7 7. 6.5 Link Distance (m) 9.8 9.8 9.8 5. 5. 5. 88.6 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (m). 9. 9. 5. 5. Storage Blk Time (%) 9 Queuing Penalty (veh) 5 9 Intersection: : Lake Lousie Drive/Worthington Avenue & Bovaird Drive Movement SB Directions Served TR Maximum Queue (m) 6.8 Average Queue (m) 7. 95th Queue (m) 59.5 Link Distance (m) 96.6 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (m) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) 9-55 Bovaird Class EA SimTraffic Report ENTRA Consultants Page

Queuing and Blocking Report <> PM Peak Hour without NSTC /4/ Intersection: : Bovaird Drive & Ashby Field Road Movement EB EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB WB NB NB Directions Served L T T T R L T T T R L TR Maximum Queue (m) 5.8 8. 78. 85. 7.7 44.5 84. 7.8 7. 8. 6.8 9. Average Queue (m).6 47.6 47.5 5. 8. 8. 4.9 8.6 4..9 9.6. 95th Queue (m) 9. 88.6 86.9 9.7 9. 5.9 9.8 86.9 88..6. 4. Link Distance (m) 85. 85. 85. 46. 46. 46. 89.7 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (m) 48. 9... 75. Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: : Bovaird Drive & Ashby Field Road Movement SB SB SB Directions Served L L TR Maximum Queue (m).4 6.4.5 Average Queue (m). 6..4 95th Queue (m) 4.6 5. 4.9 Link Distance (m).7 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (m).. Storage Blk Time (%) 7 Queuing Penalty (veh) 4 Bovaird Class EA SimTraffic Report ENTRA Consultants Page

Queuing and Blocking Report <> PM Peak Hour without NSTC /4/ Intersection: : Bovaird Drive & Mississauga Road Movement EB EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB WB NB NB Directions Served L T T T R L T T T R L T Maximum Queue (m) 47.5 8.5 77. 87. 4.4 49.8 6.6.9 7.4 4. 5. 8.6 Average Queue (m) 9. 64. 66. 74..5 4. 47.6.9 5. 7.9.8 4. 95th Queue (m) 49. 9. 9.7 9.5 47.4 89..4 8.5 78. 6.6.4 6. Link Distance (m) 456. 456. 456. 688.9 688.9 688.9 95. Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (m).. 6. 6. 8. Storage Blk Time (%) 6 4 59 4 5 54 Queuing Penalty (veh) 8 4 5 4 Intersection: : Bovaird Drive & Mississauga Road Movement NB NB NB SB SB SB SB SB Directions Served T T R L T T T R Maximum Queue (m).4 85.5 64.5 77.8 55.8 64. 65.7. Average Queue (m).6 6.4 4. 4.4 95.5. 7.8.7 95th Queue (m) 59.7 7. 7. 86. 88.5 5.7 99.6 4.4 Link Distance (m) 95. 95. 46.8 46.8 46.8 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (m) 5. 8. 6. Storage Blk Time (%) 55 66 8 Queuing Penalty (veh) 97 9 4 Bovaird Class EA SimTraffic Report ENTRA Consultants Page

Queuing and Blocking Report <> PM Peak Hour without NSTC /4/ Intersection: 4: Bovaird Drive & Heritage Road Movement EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB NB NB NB SB Directions Served L T T R L T T R L T TR L Maximum Queue (m) 9. 55. 6. 6.4 7.6 49.4 58. 4.9 5.4 6. 6.. Average Queue (m) 9.5 69.5 94..9...6..7.5.5. 95th Queue (m).7 6.8 77. 7.6 8.9 49.5 6. 6. 6.7.5 9.9 7.4 Link Distance (m) 99.6 99.6 4.6 4.6 57.6 57.6 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (m) 5.. 55.... Storage Blk Time (%) 6 9 7 Queuing Penalty (veh) 4 5 Intersection: 4: Bovaird Drive & Heritage Road Movement SB SB Directions Served T TR Maximum Queue (m) 7.5. Average Queue (m).7. 95th Queue (m).8 7.6 Link Distance (m) 4.4 4.4 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (m) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 5: Bovaird Drive & Caseley Street Movement Directions Served Maximum Queue (m) Average Queue (m) 95th Queue (m) Link Distance (m) Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (m) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 957 Bovaird Class EA SimTraffic Report ENTRA Consultants Page 4

Queuing and Blocking Report <> PM Peak Hour with NSTC /4/ Intersection: 4: James Potter Road/Creditview Road & Bovaird Drive Movement EB EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB WB NB NB Directions Served L T T T R L T T T R L T Maximum Queue (m) 7.8..9 5. 8..8 65. 69.5 4. 4.9. 45.5 Average Queue (m) 6. 47.7 5.4 6..5 4.5 78.6 68.8 57.5 6. 9.5.6 95th Queue (m) 6.7 88. 9. 94.5.8.8 47. 4.6. 5. 8.4 9.7 Link Distance (m) 44.5 44.5 44.5 45. 45. 45.. Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (m) 7. 8.. 7. 4. Storage Blk Time (%) 9 4 Queuing Penalty (veh) 5 4 Intersection: 4: James Potter Road/Creditview Road & Bovaird Drive Movement NB NB SB SB SB SB Directions Served T R L T T R Maximum Queue (m) 5..4 5.6.5.8. Average Queue (m) 9... 6.6.9.6 95th Queue (m) 4..5 4...7 6.8 Link Distance (m). 5. 5. Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (m) 55. 8.. Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) 9-55 Bovaird Class EA SimTraffic Report ENTRA Consultants Page

Queues Excellence in Transportation Planning

Queuing and Blocking Report < with NSTC> AM Peak Hour // Intersection: : Lake Lousie Drive/Worthington Avenue & Bovaird Drive Movement EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB WB NB NB SB Directions Served L T T TR L T T T R L TR L Maximum Queue (m) 4.6 7.8 9.5 7.4 7.9. 7.8 47.8.7 8. 4. 7. Average Queue (m) 4.8 5.7 58.6 64.4.9 6.6 68. 7.6 4.. 4. 57.9 95th Queue (m) 45. 6..6 7.4.. 5... 4.4 9.4 9. Link Distance (m) 9.8 9.8 9.8 5. 5. 5. 88.6 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (m). 9. 9. 5. 5. Storage Blk Time (%) 8 8 Queuing Penalty (veh) 5 6 Intersection: : Lake Lousie Drive/Worthington Avenue & Bovaird Drive Movement SB Directions Served TR Maximum Queue (m) 5.8 Average Queue (m) 7. 95th Queue (m) 4. Link Distance (m) 96.6 Upstream Blk Time (%) 47 Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (m) Storage Blk Time (%) 45 Queuing Penalty (veh) 4 9-55 Bovaird Class EA SimTraffic Report ENTRA Consultants Page

Queuing and Blocking Report < with NSTC> AM Peak Hour 4/7/ Intersection: : Bovaird Drive & Ashby Field Road Movement EB EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB WB NB NB Directions Served L T T T R L T T T R L TR Maximum Queue (m) 6.4 7.6 6.8 8.4 9. 8.4 4.9 64.5 7. 5.6 8.7 8. Average Queue (m).8 6.6 6.5 69.7 4.7.7 96.6 97..6 9.6 46.5 5.5 95th Queue (m).9 7.6 9.5.5. 7.5 5. 5. 56..4 77. 7. Link Distance (m) 85. 85. 85. 46. 46. 46. 89.7 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (m) 48. 9... 75. Storage Blk Time (%) 6 4 5 Queuing Penalty (veh) 4 5 Intersection: : Bovaird Drive & Ashby Field Road Movement SB SB SB Directions Served L L TR Maximum Queue (m) 4..6.6 Average Queue (m) 5.8 7.. 95th Queue (m). 4. 8.7 Link Distance (m).7 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (m) 7. 7. Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) 9-55 Bovaird Class EA SimTraffic Report ENTRA Consultants Page

Queuing and Blocking Report < with NSTC> AM Peak Hour 4/7/ Intersection: : Bovaird Drive & Mississauga Road Movement EB EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB WB WB NB Directions Served L T T T R L L T T T R L Maximum Queue (m) 9.6.6.6 8. 6. 4. 4. 6.9 7.7 7.7. 7. Average Queue (m). 79. 58. 49.7.8 95. 98.5 79.8 88.8 79. 9.4 84.4 95th Queue (m) 6.8 7.. 75.4 6.5 47. 5. 56. 6.7 55..9.4 Link Distance (m) 454. 454. 454. 4. 4. 4. Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (m) 5. 4. 5. 5. 5. 9. Storage Blk Time (%) 5 Queuing Penalty (veh) 4 7 9 4 Intersection: : Bovaird Drive & Mississauga Road Movement NB NB NB NB NB SB SB SB SB SB Directions Served L T T T R L T T T R Maximum Queue (m).8 97. 97.8 96.8 74. 5.6 6.9 49. 48. 4.4 Average Queue (m) 84.7 5..6 7. 9.9 7.7 46.4 7. 74.. 95th Queue (m) 5.4 46.5 96.4 7. 55. 46.9 66.5 96. 97.. Link Distance (m) 9. 9. 9. 44.6 44.6 44.6 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (m) 9.. 5.. Storage Blk Time (%) 6 4 Queuing Penalty (veh) 7 47 4 9-55 Bovaird Class EA SimTraffic Report ENTRA Consultants Page

Queuing and Blocking Report < with NSTC> AM Peak Hour 4/7/ Intersection: 4: Bovaird Drive & Heritage Road Movement EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB B5 NB NB NB Directions Served L T T R L T T R T L T TR Maximum Queue (m) 4. 6.6 45.8 6.7 5..7 47. 8.9 44. 4. 7. 9.5 Average Queue (m) 4. 7.4 6..7 7.7 8.5 8.. 9.6.4.6 6. 95th Queue (m).9 5.7 45..9 7..5 47.9 6. 69..9 6.4 6.6 Link Distance (m) 99.6 99.6 4.6 4.6 454. 57.6 57.6 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (m) 5.. 55. 5.. Storage Blk Time (%) 6 Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 4: Bovaird Drive & Heritage Road Movement SB SB SB Directions Served L T TR Maximum Queue (m) 7.7 9.4 5.4 Average Queue (m). 6.8.7 95th Queue (m) 7.6 6.7. Link Distance (m) 4.4 4.4 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (m). Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 5: Bovaird Drive & Caseley Street Movement NB Directions Served LR Maximum Queue (m) 7.4 Average Queue (m).5 95th Queue (m).5 Link Distance (m) 9. Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (m) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) 9-55 Bovaird Class EA SimTraffic Report ENTRA Consultants Page 4

Queuing and Blocking Report < with NSTC> AM Peak Hour // Intersection: 6: James Potter Road/Creditview Road & Bovaird Drive Movement EB EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB WB B4 B4 Directions Served L T T T R L T T T R T T Maximum Queue (m) 59.4 8.4.5 8.9 9.8 64.9 7. 6. 6.5 67.9.4 44.6 Average Queue (m) 7.9 9.5 97.6 5.6 6.4 7.4 8. 4.8 54.9 46.6.6. 95th Queue (m) 76.9 5. 7.6 6. 94.5 57. 8.6 6.4 57.5 46... Link Distance (m) 4. 4. 4. 48. 48. 48. 85. 85. Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) 6 9 6 Storage Bay Dist (m) 7. 5. 5.. Storage Blk Time (%) 5 Queuing Penalty (veh) 4 4 4 Intersection: 6: James Potter Road/Creditview Road & Bovaird Drive Movement B4 NB NB NB NB SB SB SB SB Directions Served T L T T R L T T R Maximum Queue (m) 46.5 7.4 7.5 6.5.9 77.9 94..9 64.8 Average Queue (m).5. 4. 4.8 5.9 4. 6.5 7.9 9.7 95th Queue (m).7 6.8 58.8 5.8. 64.8 89. 5. 5.9 Link Distance (m) 85. 7. 7. 8. 8. Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (m) 4. 8. 8. 5. Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Zone Summary Zone wide Queuing Penalty: 4 9-55 Bovaird Class EA SimTraffic Report ENTRA Consultants Page

Queues < with NSTC> AM Peak Hour 6: James Potter Road/Creditview Road & Bovaird Drive // Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Group Flow (vph) 45 4 77 7 95 6 7 79 79 55 74 59 v/c Ratio.98.55..77.98.9.8.66.4.56.75.75 Control Delay 77. 7. 9.9 5. 56. 6.8 46. 56.. 4.9 47.8.4 Queue Delay............ Total Delay 77. 7. 9.9 5. 56. 6.8 46. 56.. 4.9 47.8.4 Queue Length 5th (m) 88.9 87... 75.4.7.5 48.4.. 88.9 9.6 Queue Length 95th (m) #74.6.8 4. 67.9 #4.4. 5.9 64.4. 47.7 9.7 8.8 Internal Link Dist (m) 48.6 4.9.4.6 Turn Bay Length (m) 7. 5. 5.. 4. 8. 8. 5. Base Capacity (vph) 45 8 77 4 959 7 6 849 44 84 55 787 Starvation Cap Reductn Spillback Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn Reduced v/c Ratio.98.55..66.98.9.5.45.8.55.58.66 Intersection Summary # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. 9-55 Bovaird Class EA Synchro 8 Report ENTRA Consultants Page

Queuing and Blocking Report <> PM Peak Hour with NSTC // Intersection: : Lake Lousie Drive/Worthington Avenue & Bovaird Drive Movement EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB WB NB SB SB Directions Served L T T TR L T T T R TR L TR Maximum Queue (m) 6. 59.7 64.6 77. 4.8 98..4.9 49..5 7.8 87. Average Queue (m) 78..5 6.8.9 5.8 7.8 76. 78.9 7. 5. 4. 5.9 95th Queue (m).6 47. 5. 6. 5.5.9 99.6.5 55.6 5. 7.6 7. Link Distance (m) 9.8 9.8 9.8 5. 5. 5. 88.6 96.6 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (m). 9. 9. 5. Storage Blk Time (%) 4 4 Queuing Penalty (veh) 9 9 Intersection: : James Potter Road/Creditview Road & Bovaird Drive Movement EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB WB NB NB NB Directions Served L T T T L T T T R L T T Maximum Queue (m) 66.6 45.4 57. 57. 8. 4.4 6.4 9.5 9.. 7. 7. Average Queue (m).9. 5.9 4.7 8. 59. 67.7 7.9 6. 4.9 5. 55.9 95th Queue (m) 48.4 46.8 5. 55. 4. 4. 48.8 57.7 74.6 8.8 4.7 8.4 Link Distance (m) 48.6 48.6 48.6 49.4 49.4 49.4.4.4 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (m) 7. 5.. 4. Storage Blk Time (%) 5 4 4 75 64 Queuing Penalty (veh) 66 9 57 75 Intersection: : James Potter Road/Creditview Road & Bovaird Drive Movement NB SB SB SB SB Directions Served R L T T R Maximum Queue (m) 4. 84. 58.8 6.8 8. Average Queue (m).9 55.5 9.6 4.9 4. 95th Queue (m) 7.6 84. 6. 64.5 79.7 Link Distance (m) 65. 65. Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (m) 8. 8. 5. Storage Blk Time (%) 6 Queuing Penalty (veh) Zone Summary Zone wide Queuing Penalty: 45 9-55 Bovaird Class EA SimTraffic Report ENTRA Consultants Page

Queues <> PM Peak Hour with NSTC : James Potter Road/Creditview Road & Bovaird Drive // Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Group Flow (vph) 59 95 7 79 4 55 77 74 7 6 79 45 v/c Ratio.97.75..5.99.9.8.99.64.96.4.5 Control Delay 7.7 9.7.7 6. 74.5 7. 5.8 84.5.9 88. 7. 5.8 Queue Delay............ Total Delay 7.7 9.7.7 6. 74.5 7. 5.8 84.5.9 88. 7. 5.8 Queue Length 5th (m) 6.8 5..4 8.5.7. 8.5 6. 7. 4. 4.. Queue Length 95th (m) #98.6 7.8..6 #66.8 6.9 4.6 #46.7 68. #9. 56..9 Internal Link Dist (m) 47. 45.5 7.7 59.9 Turn Bay Length (m) 7. 5. 5.. 4. 8. 8. 5. Base Capacity (vph) 54 565 8 59 56 4 75 48 5 784 Starvation Cap Reductn Spillback Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn Reduced v/c Ratio.97.75..5.99.9.8.99.64.96.4.5 Intersection Summary # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. 9-55 Bovaird Class EA Synchro 8 Report ENTRA Consultants Page

Queuing and Blocking Report <> PM Peak with NSTC (Single WB Left) /4/ Intersection: : Bovaird Drive & Ashby Field Road Movement EB EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB WB NB NB Directions Served L T T T R L T T T R L TR Maximum Queue (m) 7..5 4.7 4.6 98.4 9.6 7. 75. 77.. 5.6 4.6 Average Queue (m).9 79. 8. 95.9 7.5.4 4.4 4. 45.4 4.8. 4.9 95th Queue (m) 9. 8. 44.5 6..9 6. 8. 85.6 9... 7. Link Distance (m) 85. 85. 85. 46. 46. 46. 89.7 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (m) 48. 9... 75. Storage Blk Time (%) 8 Queuing Penalty (veh) 5 Intersection: : Bovaird Drive & Ashby Field Road Movement SB SB SB Directions Served L L TR Maximum Queue (m) 6. 4.7. Average Queue (m) 8..6 7.5 95th Queue (m) 4. 47.7 7.7 Link Distance (m).7 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (m).. Storage Blk Time (%) 8 9 Queuing Penalty (veh) 5 5 Bovaird Class EA SimTraffic Report ENTRA Consultants Page

Queuing and Blocking Report <> PM Peak with NSTC (Single WB Left) /4/ Intersection: : Bovaird Drive & Mississauga Road Movement EB EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB WB NB NB Directions Served L T T T R L T T T R L L Maximum Queue (m) 44.9 7.8 67.4 69.6 4.7 4.5. 5. 6.8 9.8 76.8 84.9 Average Queue (m) 4. 44.7.6 5. 5. 9. 5.. 9.4 9.7 58.5 6.4 95th Queue (m) 48.6 4.5. 7.5 7.4 48.6 6.7 6. 86.5. 88.7 9.6 Link Distance (m) 454. 454. 454. 687. 687. 687. Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (m).. 6. 6. 8. 8. Storage Blk Time (%) 5 46 Queuing Penalty (veh) 8 56 8 6 4 4 7 7 Intersection: : Bovaird Drive & Mississauga Road Movement NB NB NB NB SB SB SB SB SB Directions Served T T T R L T T T R Maximum Queue (m) 4.8 6.8 6.8 96. 8.6 5.8 6.8 65.8.5 Average Queue (m) 7.9 9. 96. 69.8 8.7 44. 5.5 54.9.5 95th Queue (m) 46.. 4.9.. 65. 7. 7.6 6. Link Distance (m) 94.9 94.9 94.9 46.7 46.7 46.7 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (m) 5. 8. 6. Storage Blk Time (%) 6 44 4 Queuing Penalty (veh) 4 4 Bovaird Class EA SimTraffic Report ENTRA Consultants Page

Queuing and Blocking Report <> PM Peak with NSTC (Single WB Left) /4/ Intersection: 4: Bovaird Drive & Heritage Road Movement EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB B5 NB NB NB Directions Served L T T R L T T R T L T TR Maximum Queue (m).7.4 4. 5.4 6. 7...7 5.7.6 9.5 5.7 Average Queue (m) 6.5 59.8 54.6.8. 5.8.6. 7...7 6.9 95th Queue (m) 5. 59. 95. 7.6 7..7 4.. 64.8 4.. 8.7 Link Distance (m) 99.6 99.6 4.6 4.6 454. 57.6 57.6 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (m) 5.. 55... Storage Blk Time (%) 8 Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 4: Bovaird Drive & Heritage Road Movement SB SB SB Directions Served L T TR Maximum Queue (m). 7. 5.6 Average Queue (m).8.9 8. 95th Queue (m). 8.8 7.8 Link Distance (m) 4.4 4.4 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (m). Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 5: Bovaird Drive & Caseley Street Movement NB Directions Served LR Maximum Queue (m).6 Average Queue (m). 95th Queue (m).9 Link Distance (m) 9. Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (m) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 84 Bovaird Class EA SimTraffic Report ENTRA Consultants Page 4

Queuing and Blocking Report <> PM Peak with NSTC (WB Double Left) /4/ Intersection: : Bovaird Drive & Mississauga Road Movement EB EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB WB WB NB Directions Served L T T T R L L T T T R L Maximum Queue (m) 4.. 6. 7.5 5. 55.9 59. 7. 75.. 4.4 49. Average Queue (m).9 9.6 8.6 8.6.5 4.5 44.9 9.5. 84. 8.5 7.4 95th Queue (m) 46.. 97.6 45.8 56. 6.6 65. 96.4.8 4.6 6.9 55.4 Link Distance (m) 454. 454. 454. 687. 687. 687. Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (m).. 6. 6. 6. 8. Storage Blk Time (%) 8 45 6 Queuing Penalty (veh) 47 49 4 5 9 7 Intersection: : Bovaird Drive & Mississauga Road Movement NB NB NB NB NB SB SB SB SB SB Directions Served L T T T R L T T T R Maximum Queue (m) 57. 5.5 8. 49.5 87.. 76.7. 78.7 9. Average Queue (m) 4...5 8.4 67..9 75.4 69.8 6.6.6 95th Queue (m) 59.6 45.7 46. 54. 95. 4.9.7 66.5 84.4. Link Distance (m) 9. 9. 9. 45. 45. 45. Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (m) 8. 5. 8. 6. Storage Blk Time (%) 49 7 Queuing Penalty (veh) 75 48 5 Bovaird Class EA SimTraffic Report ENTRA Consultants Page

Queuing and Blocking Report < without NSTC> AM Peak Hour // Intersection: : Lake Lousie Drive/Worthington Avenue & Bovaird Drive Movement EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB WB NB NB SB Directions Served L T T TR L T T T R L TR L Maximum Queue (m) 4.5 7.4 7.4 77.7 5.5 77.9 84. 85. 5.4. 4.9 7. Average Queue (m).7 9.6 6. 46.4. 47. 55. 55. 4.5 9. 7.7 65.6 95th Queue (m) 4.8 58. 64.7 76. 9. 75.6 8.8 85.7..5 6. 77. Link Distance (m) 9.8 9.8 9.8 5. 5. 5. 88.6 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (m). 9. 9. 5. 5. Storage Blk Time (%) 4 Queuing Penalty (veh) 67 Intersection: : Lake Lousie Drive/Worthington Avenue & Bovaird Drive Movement SB Directions Served TR Maximum Queue (m).4 Average Queue (m) 4.7 95th Queue (m) 9. Link Distance (m) 96.6 Upstream Blk Time (%) 5 Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (m) Storage Blk Time (%) 9 Queuing Penalty (veh) 5 9-55 Bovaird Class EA SimTraffic Report ENTRA Consultants Page

Queuing and Blocking Report < without NSTC> AM Peak Hour 4/7/ Intersection: : Bovaird Drive & Ashby Field Road Movement EB EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB WB NB NB Directions Served L T T T R L T T T R L TR Maximum Queue (m) 7.7 8. 8.8 7.9 8. 7.6 97.6 5.8 5.7 49. 47.5 7.8 Average Queue (m).8 6..9 9. 4..6 5. 5.5 55.8. 9. 7.7 95th Queue (m) 7.9 7. 6.5 65.9. 69. 96.4.7 4. 89.7 4.6 7. Link Distance (m) 85. 85. 85. 46. 46. 46. 89.6 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (m) 48. 9... 75. Storage Blk Time (%) 4 4 Queuing Penalty (veh) 5 9 Intersection: : Bovaird Drive & Ashby Field Road Movement SB SB SB Directions Served L L TR Maximum Queue (m) 8. 6.5 8.5 Average Queue (m) 6..5. 95th Queue (m) 5.. 4.7 Link Distance (m).5 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (m) 7. 7. Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) 9-55 Bovaird Class EA SimTraffic Report ENTRA Consultants Page

Queuing and Blocking Report < without NSTC> AM Peak Hour 4/7/ Intersection: : Bovaird Drive & Mississauga Road Movement EB EB EB EB EB B5 B5 B5 WB WB WB WB Directions Served L T T T R T T T L L T T Maximum Queue (m) 9.7 468. 468.6 47.8. 69.4 76.. 79.8 9. 79. 84.5 Average Queue (m) 4. 4. 47. 6.7 9.8 4.6 8.8..4 4. 6. 6.9 95th Queue (m). 54.6 544. 559.7 54.. 4. 56.4 7.4 76.7 8.9 87.6 Link Distance (m) 454. 454. 454. 469. 469. 469. 687. 687. Upstream Blk Time (%) 4 Queuing Penalty (veh) 9 6 64 Storage Bay Dist (m) 5. 4. 5. 5. Storage Blk Time (%) 66 77 8 7 Queuing Penalty (veh) 5 9 49 4 Intersection: : Bovaird Drive & Mississauga Road Movement WB WB NB NB NB NB NB NB SB SB SB SB Directions Served T R L L T T T R L T T T Maximum Queue (m) 96.4 84.9 75. 76. 97.8 97.8 97.8 59.9 46. 49.6 8.9 9.9 Average Queue (m) 7.6 8.8 54.4 55..9 8. 5. 68.8 5. 8.5 67.8 7. 95th Queue (m). 76. 86.7 85. 46. 4.8.7. 4.. 86. 89. Link Distance (m) 687. 9. 9. 9. 45. 45. 45. Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (m) 5. 9. 9.. 5. Storage Blk Time (%) 7 9 54 Queuing Penalty (veh) 7 95 46 Intersection: : Bovaird Drive & Mississauga Road Movement SB Directions Served R Maximum Queue (m) 86.7 Average Queue (m) 9.5 95th Queue (m) 5.9 Link Distance (m) Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (m). Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) 9-55 Bovaird Class EA SimTraffic Report ENTRA Consultants Page

Queuing and Blocking Report < without NSTC> AM Peak Hour 4/7/ Intersection: 4: Bovaird Drive & Heritage Road Movement EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB NB NB NB SB Directions Served L T T R L T T R L T TR L Maximum Queue (m) 6.4 464.4 464.4 5.4.6.8 7.7 55. 4.. 5.6 4. Average Queue (m).9 6.9 7. 5.6 8.4 6. 68..7 4.4 9. 4.7.4 95th Queue (m). 45.7 8.7.6..5.9 9.7.6 8.8 4..7 Link Distance (m) 99.6 99.6 4.6 4.6 57.6 57.6 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (m) 5.. 55. 5... Storage Blk Time (%) 4 6 Queuing Penalty (veh) 7 6 Intersection: 4: Bovaird Drive & Heritage Road Movement SB SB Directions Served T TR Maximum Queue (m). 45.4 Average Queue (m) 5.7 7.8 95th Queue (m) 6.9 4. Link Distance (m) 4.4 4.4 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (m) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 5: Bovaird Drive & Caseley Street Movement B B NB Directions Served T LR Maximum Queue (m) 7.7 47. 8.4 Average Queue (m). 84.7.5 95th Queue (m) 45.8 8.7 8.7 Link Distance (m) 99.6 99.6 9. Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (m) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 5 9-55 Bovaird Class EA SimTraffic Report ENTRA Consultants Page 4

Queuing and Blocking Report < without NSTC> AM Peak Hour // Intersection: : James Potter Road/Creditview Road & Bovaird Drive Movement EB EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB WB NB NB Directions Served L T T T R L T T T R L T Maximum Queue (m) 9.8 46.5 8. 8.8 6.5 64.9 449.5 48. 4.9 7. 7.4 5. Average Queue (m) 85. 4.9 7. 4.9.. 84.4 44.5 45..7.5 87.6 95th Queue (m) 85.4 48.4 76.6 9. 4.4. 44. 68. 79..4.6 56.6 Link Distance (m) 4.8 4.8 4.8 445. 445. 445. 47.7 Upstream Blk Time (%) 5 5 Queuing Penalty (veh) 6 6 Storage Bay Dist (m) 7. 5. 5.. 4. Storage Blk Time (%) 46 4 4 57 5 5 Queuing Penalty (veh) 5 5 9 Intersection: : James Potter Road/Creditview Road & Bovaird Drive Movement NB NB SB SB SB SB Directions Served T R L T T R Maximum Queue (m) 58.4 9.9 9.9 7..8 75. Average Queue (m) 9..4 77. 6. 65.8.6 95th Queue (m) 6. 74.6 64.8 87.6 89..8 Link Distance (m) 47.7.4.4 Upstream Blk Time (%) 8 6 Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (m) 8. 8. 5. Storage Blk Time (%) 64 6 Queuing Penalty (veh) 6 8 7 Zone Summary Zone wide Queuing Penalty: 69 9-55 Bovaird Class EA SimTraffic Report ENTRA Consultants Page

Queuing and Blocking Report <> PM Peak Hour without NSTC (Single WB Left) // Intersection: : Lake Lousie Drive/Worthington Avenue & Bovaird Drive Movement EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB WB NB NB SB Directions Served L T T TR L T T T R L TR L Maximum Queue (m) 6.4 4.5 46.4 5.8.8 8.8 9.4 8.9 5.6 9. 5.6 7.8 Average Queue (m) 69.. 4. 7.6. 75.5 78.9 77.9 5.8.6 5. 49.9 95th Queue (m).7 8. 4.6 49. 6. 4.. 8. 48. 4.4 4.6 78.7 Link Distance (m) 9.8 9.8 9.8 5. 5. 5. 88.6 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (m). 9. 9. 5. 5. Storage Blk Time (%) 5 4 4 Queuing Penalty (veh) 4 Intersection: : Lake Lousie Drive/Worthington Avenue & Bovaird Drive Movement SB Directions Served TR Maximum Queue (m) 8.7 Average Queue (m) 45.4 95th Queue (m) 7.9 Link Distance (m) 96.6 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (m) Storage Blk Time (%) 9 Queuing Penalty (veh) 8 9-55 Bovaird Class EA SimTraffic Report ENTRA Consultants Page

Queuing and Blocking Report PM Peak without NSTC(Single WB Left) /4/ Intersection: : Bovaird Drive & Mississauga Road Movement EB EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB WB NB NB Directions Served L T T T R L T T T R L L Maximum Queue (m) 64.7.4 7.4.9 4.8 59.8 5.. 8.4.8 94.8 97. Average Queue (m) 9.4 7. 78.9 84.5 7.. 6.9. 58.5 9.9 7.4 7. 95th Queue (m) 6.5 8. 5..5 49. 94. 5.9 8. 9.9 6.4 8. 8. Link Distance (m) 454. 454. 454. 687. 687. 687. Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (m).. 6. 6. 8. 8. Storage Blk Time (%) 4 4 5 65 8 8 8 Queuing Penalty (veh) 67 5 4 4 4 8 5 64 Intersection: : Bovaird Drive & Mississauga Road Movement NB NB NB NB SB SB SB SB SB Directions Served T T T R L T T T R Maximum Queue (m) 65.8 98.8 9. 69. 88.7 4.8 9.5 9.7 59. Average Queue (m) 75.4. 7. 49.9 7.8 9.5 9.8 89.7 56. 95th Queue (m) 74. 8.. 86.4 6.4 6..7.4 6.9 Link Distance (m) 94.9 94.9 94.9 46.7 46.7 46.7 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (m) 5. 8. 6. Storage Blk Time (%) 79 74 65 Queuing Penalty (veh) 47 6 89 Bovaird Class EA SimTraffic Report ENTRA Consultants Page

Queuing and Blocking Report PM Peak without NSTC(Single WB Left) /4/ Intersection: : Bovaird Drive & Ashby Field Road Movement EB EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB WB NB NB Directions Served L T T T R L T T T R L TR Maximum Queue (m) 8.4.7.. 4. 4.8 78.7 75. 74..6 7.8.9 Average Queue (m).5 6.7 6. 67. 4. 7.5 4. 6. 8.4 6..4.7 95th Queue (m) 8.7.7 7. 4.7 6. 5. 87.6 78.4 76..7. 4.4 Link Distance (m) 85. 85. 85. 46. 46. 46. 89.7 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (m) 48. 9... 75. Storage Blk Time (%) 4 Queuing Penalty (veh) 7 Intersection: : Bovaird Drive & Ashby Field Road Movement SB SB SB Directions Served L L TR Maximum Queue (m) 6.4 6.6 5.4 Average Queue (m) 6.4 6.5 4.6 95th Queue (m) 4.7 4..9 Link Distance (m).7 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (m).. Storage Blk Time (%) 5 Queuing Penalty (veh) 7 4 4 Bovaird Class EA SimTraffic Report ENTRA Consultants Page

Queuing and Blocking Report PM Peak without NSTC(Single WB Left) /4/ Intersection: 4: Bovaird Drive & Heritage Road Movement EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB NB NB NB SB Directions Served L T T R L T T R L T TR L Maximum Queue (m) 4. 9.6 89.8 6..5 6.6 7.8 7.9 4.. 5.5.7 Average Queue (m).9 7.9. 6.6 5.7.6 46.9.6 6. 5.6 7. 5.6 95th Queue (m) 6.8 447. 4.9 5.6 4. 68.7 84. 6.9 7.6 6. 4.9 7.5 Link Distance (m) 99.6 99.6 4.6 4.6 57.6 57.6 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (m) 5.. 55.... Storage Blk Time (%) 6 8 Queuing Penalty (veh) 4 8 Intersection: 4: Bovaird Drive & Heritage Road Movement SB SB Directions Served T TR Maximum Queue (m) 9.6 9.5 Average Queue (m).7 6.6 95th Queue (m). 4. Link Distance (m) 4.4 4.4 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (m) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 5: Bovaird Drive & Caseley Street Movement B B Directions Served T Maximum Queue (m) 7. 6.5 Average Queue (m).4 5. 95th Queue (m). 48. Link Distance (m) 99.6 99.6 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (m) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 4 Bovaird Class EA SimTraffic Report ENTRA Consultants Page 4

Queuing and Blocking Report PM Peak without NSTC(Double WB Left) /4/ Intersection: : Bovaird Drive & Mississauga Road Movement EB EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB WB WB NB Directions Served L T T T R L L T T T R L Maximum Queue (m) 4.5..7 8.7 59. 9. 56.8 44. 65.5 8.9.7 57.5 Average Queue (m).8 74.5 79.7 88.5 9. 8.9 5.6 9.4 97. 6.6 7.6 44.4 95th Queue (m) 46. 4.5.6.8 6..6 77.6 6. 96. 9.4 6. 7.4 Link Distance (m) 454. 454. 454. 687. 687. 687. Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (m).. 6. 6. 6. 8. Storage Blk Time (%) 4 5 5 6 6 8 Queuing Penalty (veh) 5 6 4 54 9 Intersection: : Bovaird Drive & Mississauga Road Movement NB NB NB NB NB SB SB SB SB SB Directions Served L T T T R L T T T R Maximum Queue (m) 54.7 6.9 9. 9.7 8.5 8. 9.5 69..5 7.4 Average Queue (m) 47.4 88. 8.8 95. 6.9 66.4 7. 66.8 57.4. 95th Queue (m) 74.9. 79.8 4. 9.9. 94. 7.8 5.9 99. Link Distance (m) 9. 9. 9. 45. 45. 45. Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (m) 8. 5. 8. 6. Storage Blk Time (%) 87 75 6 Queuing Penalty (veh) 8 7 87 Bovaird Class EA SimTraffic Report ENTRA Consultants Page

Queuing and Blocking Report <> PM Peak Hour without NSTC (Single WB Left) // Intersection: : James Potter Road/Creditview Road & Bovaird Drive Movement EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB WB NB NB NB Directions Served L T T T L T T T R L T T Maximum Queue (m) 9.6 8. 5. 5. 64.6 454. 457.5 456.4 7. 7.4 4.7 4. Average Queue (m) 8. 7.5. 96.6 4.4 5.. 9. 6...7.4 95th Queue (m) 8.5 6. 9.8.6 4. 474.8 45. 45. 4.4 56.4 8.5. Link Distance (m) 45.5 45.5 45.5 447.8 447.8 447.8 4.8 4.8 Upstream Blk Time (%) 5 4 5 Queuing Penalty (veh) 8 6 Storage Bay Dist (m) 7. 5.. 4. Storage Blk Time (%) 54 7 5 44 5 Queuing Penalty (veh) 94 8 4 74 6 54 8 Intersection: : James Potter Road/Creditview Road & Bovaird Drive Movement NB SB SB SB SB Directions Served R L T T R Maximum Queue (m) 9.9 9.7 6.5 67. 74.8 Average Queue (m) 56..7.5 88. 85.7 95th Queue (m). 74.5 98. 9.9 5. Link Distance (m) 56.9 56.9 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (m) 8. 8. 5. Storage Blk Time (%) 69 7 Queuing Penalty (veh) 9 4 Zone Summary Zone wide Queuing Penalty: 4 9-55 Bovaird Class EA SimTraffic Report ENTRA Consultants Page

Appendix C Level of Service Definitions Excellence in Transportation Planning

Levels of Service Highway Capacity Manual Signalized Intersections Level of Service Stopped Delay per Vehicle (sec) Expected delay to Minor Street traffic from the Major Street A < Most vehicles arrive during the green phase and do not stop; traffic progression is extremely favourable. B. -. More vehicles stop than for LOS A; traffic progression is good. C. - 5. Individual cycle failures may appear and the number of vehicles stopping is significant; traffic progression is fair. D 5. - 55. Individual cycle failures are noticeable and many vehicles stop; traffic progression is unfavourable. E 55. - 8. Individual cycle failures are frequent; traffic progression is poor; acceptable delay is at its limit. F > 8 Many individual cycle failures; arrival flow rate exceeds capacity; delay is unacceptable to most drivers. Source: Highway Capacity Manual, HCM HIGHWAY LOS Signalized 8-4-7.doc ENTRA Consultants Inc.

Appendix D Region of Peel Queuing Methodology Excellence in Transportation Planning

Levels of Service Highway Capacity Manual Unsignalized Intersection Level of Service Average Control Delays (s/veh) Expected delay to Minor Street traffic from the Major Street A - Little or no delay. B > 5 Short traffic delay. C > 5 5 Average traffic delay. D > 5 5 Long traffic delay. E > 5 5 Very long traffic delay. F > 5 Extreme delay encountered with queuing, which may cause severe congestion affecting other traffic movements in the intersection. source: Highway Capacity Manual, HCM UNSIGNALIZED LOS 8-4-7.doc ENTRA Consultants

Level Of Service Vehicle Arrival Rates And Phase Times A B C D E X Phase 95% 9% 75% 6% 5% Vehicles Time Sec.....5..9.5..7.6.8.4.8.6...7.4..7.6 7..9...7.8.5...7.6 9.7.4.9.8.4.6.. 4..7 4.6 4...8.5..4 4. 4. 5. 4.7 5.6 5 4..9...8 4. 5. 5. 6. 5.7 6.6 6 6.4..9.9 4.6 5. 5.9 6. 6.9 6.7 7.6 7 8.6 4. 4.6 4.7 5.4 6. 6.8 7. 7.9 7.7 8.6 8.8 4.7 5.4 5.5 6. 6.9 7.7 8. 8..8 8.7 9.6 9. 5.5 6. 6. 7. 7.8 8.6 8.9 9.8 9.7.6 5. 6. 6.9 7. 7.8 8.7 9.5 9.9.8.7.6 7. 7. 7.7 7.9 8.6 9.6.4.9.7.7.6 9. 7.8 8.4 8.7 9.4.5..8.7.7.6.4 8.5 9. 9.5..4..8.7.7 4.6 4.5 9...4....8 4.6 4.7 5.6 5 5.6..8..9. 4. 4.7 5.6 5.7 6.6 6 7.7.9.6..8 4. 4.9 5.7 6.6 6.7 7.6 7 9.8.7.4.9.6 5. 5.9 6.7 7.6 7.7 8.6 8 4.9.5..7 4.5 6. 6.9 7.7 8.5 8.7 9.6 9 44.. 4. 4.6 5. 7. 7.8 8.6 9.5 9.7.6 46. 4. 4.9 5.4 6. 7.9 8.7 9.6.5.7.6 48. 5. 5.7 6. 7. 8.8 9.6.6.5.7.6 5. 5.8 6.5 7. 7.9 9.7.5.6.4.7.6 5. 6.6 7.4 8. 8.8.6.4.5.4.7 4.6 4 54. 7.5 8. 8.9 9.7.5.4.5 4.4 4.7 5.6 5 56. 8. 9. 9.8.6.5. 4.5 5.4 5.7 6.6 6 58. 9. 9.9.7.5.4 4. 5.5 6. 6.7 7.6 7 6...7.6. 4.4 5. 6.4 7. 7.7 8.6 8 6..8.6.4. 5. 6. 7.4 8. 8.7 9.6 9 64..7.4. 4. 6. 7. 8.4 9. 9.7.6 66..5. 4. 5. 7. 8. 9.4..7.6 68..4 4. 5. 5.9 8. 9..4..7.6 7. 4. 5. 6. 6.8 9. 9.9...7.6 7. 5. 5.9 6.9 7.6..9...7 4.6 4 74. 6. 6.7 7.7 8.5..8. 4. 4.7 5.6 5 76. 6.8 7.6 8.6 9.4.9.8 4. 5. 5.7 6.6 6 78. 7.7 8.5 9.5..9.8 5. 6. 6.7 7.6 7 8. 8.6 9..4..9 4.7 6. 7. 7.7 8.6 8 8. 9.4... 4.8 5.6 7. 8. 8.7 9.6 9 84..... 5.7 6.5 8. 9. 9.7 4.6 4 86.....9 6.6 7.4 9. 4. 4.7 4.6 4 88...9 4. 4.8 7.5 8. 4. 4. 4.7 4.6 4 9...8 4.9 5.7 8.4 9. 4. 4. 4.7 4.6 4 9..9 4.7 5.8 6.6 9. 4. 4. 4. 4.7 44.6 44 94. 4.8 5.6 6.7 7.5 4. 4. 4. 44. 44.7 45.6 45 96. 5.7 6.5 7.6 8.4 4. 4.9 44. 45. 45.7 46.6 46 98. 6.6 7.4 8.5 9. 4. 4.8 45. 46. 46.7 47.6 47. 7.5 8. 9.4 4. 4.9 4.7 46. 46.9 47.7 48.6 48. 8.4 9. 4. 4. 4.8 44.6 47. 47.9 48.7 49.6 49 4. 9. 4. 4. 4. 44.7 45.5 48. 48.9 49.7 5.6 5 6. 4. 4. 4. 4.9 45.6 46.4 49. 49.9 5.7 5.6 5 8. 4. 4.9 4. 4.8 46.5 47. 5. 5.9 5.7 5.6 5. 4. 4.8 4.9 44.7 47.4 48. 5. 5.8 5.7 5.6 5. 4.9 4.7 44.8 45.6 48. 49. 5.9 5.8 5.7 54.6 54 4. 4.8 44.6 45.7 46.5 49. 5. 5.9 5.8 54.7 55.6 55 6. 44.7 45.5 46.6 47.4 5. 5.9 5.9 54.8 55.7 56.6 56 8. 45.6 46.4 47.5 48. 5. 5.8 54.9 55.8 56.7 57.6 57. 46.5 47. 48.4 49. 5.9 5.7 55.9 56.7 57.7 58.6 58. 47.4 48. 49. 5. 5.8 5.6 56.8 57.7 58.7 59.6 59 4. 48. 49. 5. 5. 5.7 54.5 57.8 58.7 59.7 6.6 6 6. 49. 5. 5. 5.9 54.6 55.4 58.8 59.7 6.7 6.6 6 8. 5. 5.9 5. 5.8 55.5 56. 59.8 6.7 6.7 6.6 6. 5. 5.8 5.9 5.7 56.4 57. 6.8 6.6 6.7 6.6 6. 5.9 5.7 5.8 54.6 57. 58. 6.7 6.6 6.7 64.6 64 4. 5.8 5.6 54.7 55.5 58. 59. 6.7 6.6 64.7 65.6 65 6. 5.7 54.5 55.6 56.4 59. 59.9 6.7 64.6 65.7 66.6 66 8. 54.6 55.4 56.5 57. 6. 6.8 64.7 65.6 66.7 67.6 67 4. 55.5 56. 57.4 58. 6.9 6.7 65.7 66.5 67.7 68.6 68 4. 56.4 57. 58. 59. 6.8 6.6 66.6 67.5 68.7 69.6 69 44. 57. 58. 59. 6. 6.7 6.5 67.6 68.5 69.7 7.6 7 46.

Intersection Queue Summary Existing Storage Calculations Intersection Cycle Length Volumes Movement Passenger Cars Truck Volumes No. of Lanes AM Peak Midday Peak PM Peak Region's Methodology Region's Methodology Region's Methodology "m" Values "X" Values Length "m" Values "X" Values Length "m" Values "X" Values Length AM Peak Midda y Peak PM Peak AM Peak Midday Peak PM Peak AM Peak Midday Peak PM Peak Car Truck Car Truck (m) Car Truck Car Truck (m) Car Truck Car Truck (m) Bovaird Drive @ Worthington Avenue/Lake Louise Drive Northbound Left 4 47 6.4. 4.6. 4.. Southbound Left 97 77 5 4 5 9.9. 84 5.9.5 7 66 5.. 7 49 Eastbound Left 88 4 5.. 84.9. 4 8 8.. 7 Westbound Left 5 5.8. 7.. 4.8. Bovaird Drive @ Ashby Field Road Northbound Left 66 5 7...8. 7.. 4 Southbound Left 9 77.. 4.7. 9 6 5.9. 7 49 Eastbound Left 6 6.7. 7.... Westbound Left 4 9 9.4. 4.6. 7.. 4 8 Bovaird Drive @ Mississauga Road Northbound Left 8 65 5 8.7. 4 8..6 8 6.7.7 8 7 Southbound Left 7 4.6. 7.4. 7.4. 7 Eastbound Left 4 7 4.5. 7.4. 7.8. 7 Westbound Left 85 4 7 5 4 5 9.5.8 94 4..8 5 5 7..5 9 8 Bovaird Drive @ Heritage Road Eastbound Left 88.6 88.6 88.6 5 5.8. 7...6. 7 Westbound Left 88.6 88.6 88.6 58 7.4. 4.4. 7.5. 7

Bovaird Drive EA Intersection Queue Summary - Peel Region Methodology Intersection Queue Lengths, Weekday AM Peak Hour No. Intersection Available Cycle Volumes Percent Volumes Volumes No. of "m" Values "X" Values Queue Movement Storage Length Length Passenger Heavies Heavies All Traffic Lanes Length (m) (sec.) Cars (veh) (veh) (m) Bovaird Drive @ Worthington Avenue Northbound Left 5 5 % 5.7. 4 Southbound Left 5 4 % 7 47 8.. 7 Eastbound Left 64 4% 7 7 5.5. 7 49 Westbound Left 6 %.4. 7 Bovaird Drive @ Ashby Field Road Northbound Left 75 56 % 59 5.. 7 49 Southbound Left 6 % 6.. 4 Eastbound Left 48 45 % 7 5.5. 4 Westbound Left 86 5% 5 9.9. 4 8 Bovaird Drive @ Mississauga Road Northbound Left 8 4 4 6% 4 8 8.7.6 94 Southbound Left 8 4 77 % 9 86.. 4 45 Eastbound Left 5 4 9 8%.6.8 5 5 Westbound Left 6 4 56 8% 46 57.5.8 95 4 Bovaird Drive @ Heritage Road Northbound Left 88.6 4 % 4.6. 7 Southbound Left 88.6 6 % 6.4. 7 Eastbound Left 5 88.6 % 5.7. 4 8 Westbound Left 55 88.6 96 % 96.4. 5 Bovaird Drive @ Creditview Road Northbound Left 4 9 4 % 4.. Southbound Left 9 79 % 8.. Eastbound Left 8 9 54 % 57.8. 5 5 Westbound Left 85 9 89 % 9.. GENIVAR /4/ 9-55tab--4PeelRegionQueueSummary.xls

Bovaird Drive EA Intersection Queue Summary - Peel Region Methodology Intersection Queue Lengths, Weekday PM Peak Hour No. Intersection Available Cycle Volumes Percent Volumes Volumes No. of "m" Values "X" Values Queue Movement Storage Length Length Passenger Heavies Heavies All Traffic Lanes Length (m) (sec.) Cars (veh) (veh) (m) Bovaird Drive @ Worthington Avenue Northbound Left 5 7 % 7.. Southbound Left 5 7 % 5 77 5.7. 7 49 Eastbound Left 46 % 8 44.5. 6 9 Westbound Left 6 68 % 68.. Bovaird Drive @ Ashby Field Road Northbound Left 75 4 5% 44.4. 4 Southbound Left 99 % 99.. 4 8 Eastbound Left 48 4 % 4.5. 7 Westbound Left 5 % 5 5.. 7 49 Bovaird Drive @ Mississauga Road Northbound Left 8 4 4 9% 4 74.. 6 46 Southbound Left 8 4 9 % 9 5.4. 7 49 Eastbound Left 5 4 6 5% 7..4 8 Westbound Left 6 4 9 6% 5 48 5.. 8 6 4 Bovaird Drive @ Heritage Road Northbound Left 88.6 68 % 68.7. 4 Southbound Left 88.6 66 % 66.6. 4 Eastbound Left 5 88.6 76 % 76.9. Westbound Left 55 88.6 8 % 8.7. 7 5 Bovaird Drive @ Creditview Road Northbound Left 4 9 9 %.7. 7 Southbound Left 9 9 % 95.. Eastbound Left 8 9 46 % 5 5 6.. 8 56 Westbound Left 85 9 5 % 6.6. 7 GENIVAR /4/ 9-55tab--4PeelRegionQueueSummary.xls

Bovaird Drive EA Intersection Queue Summary - Peel Region Methodology Intersection Queue Lengths, Weekday AM Peak Hour, With North-South Transportation Corridor No. Intersection Available Cycle Volumes Percent Volumes Volumes No. of "m" Values "X" Values Queue Movement Storage Length Length Passenger Heavies Heavies All Traffic Lanes Length (m) (sec.) Cars (veh) (veh) (m) Bovaird Drive @ Worthington Avenue Northbound Left 5 64 % 64.. Southbound Left 5 4 % 8 5 8.. 7 Eastbound Left 8 4% 8 89 6.. 8 56 Westbound Left 9 4 % 4.5. 7 Bovaird Drive @ Ashby Field Road Northbound Left 75 98 % 4 6.6. 8 56 Southbound Left x 6 % 6.. 4 Eastbound Left 48 5 % 7 57.7. 4 Westbound Left 96 5% 5.. 4 8 Bovaird Drive @ Mississauga Road Northbound Left x 9 4 5 6% 75 6.9.4 8 7 Southbound Left 5 4 95 % 6.7.4 5 5 Eastbound Left 5 4 65 8% 4 79.5.6 8 Westbound Left x 5 4 475 8% 4 56 9..8 94 4 Bovaird Drive @ Heritage Road Northbound Left 88.6 6 % 6.4. 7 Southbound Left 88.6 %.. Eastbound Left 55 88.6 %.8. 7 Westbound Left 5 88.6 7 % 7.7. 4 5 Bovaird Drive @ Creditview Road Northbound Left 4 4 7 % 7.. Southbound Left 8 4 5 % 55 5.9. 7 49 Eastbound Left x 8 4 47 % 8 45 7.9. 7 Westbound Left 5 4 67 % 5 7.4. 84 GENIVAR 5/6/ 9-55tab-4-6PeelRegionQueueSummary.xls

Bovaird Drive EA Intersection Queue Summary - Peel Region Methodology Intersection Queue Lengths, Weekday PM Peak Hour, With North-South Transportation Corridor No. Intersection Available Cycle Volumes Percent Volumes Volumes No. of "m" Values "X" Values Queue Movement Storage Length Length Passenger Heavies Heavies All Traffic Lanes Length (m) (sec.) Cars (veh) (veh) (m) Bovaird Drive @ Worthington Avenue Northbound Left 5 7 % 7.. Southbound Left 5 89 % 6 95 6.. 8 56 Eastbound Left 489 4% 59 6..7 9 5 Westbound Left 9 69 % 69.. Bovaird Drive @ Ashby Field Road Northbound Left 75 48 % 49.6. 4 Southbound Left x %.7. 5 5 Eastbound Left 48 6 % 8.5. 7 Westbound Left 47 5% 8 55 4.9. 6 4 Bovaird Drive @ Mississauga Road Northbound Left x 9 4 8 6% 8 6..4 8 7 Southbound Left 5 4 88 % 98.4.4 5 5 Eastbound Left 5 4 9 8%.5.8 5 5 Westbound Left x 5 4 8 8% 4 6 5.5.5 7 66 4 Bovaird Drive @ Heritage Road Northbound Left 88.6 5 % 5.. 4 Southbound Left 88.6 9 % 9.5. 7 Eastbound Left 55 88.6 49 % 5.. 4 Westbound Left 5 88.6 7 % 7.4. 7 5 Bovaird Drive @ Creditview Road Northbound Left 4 4 75 % 77.9. 4 8 Southbound Left 8 4 % 4 6 7.9. 7 Eastbound Left x 8 4 59 % 59 9.9. 84 Westbound Left 5 4 77 % 79.. 4 8 GENIVAR 5/6/ 9-55tab-4-6PeelRegionQueueSummary.xls

Bovaird Drive EA Intersection Queue Summary - Peel Region Methodology Intersection Queue Lengths, Weekday AM Peak Hour, Without North-South Transportation Corridor No. Intersection Available Cycle Volumes Percent Volumes Volumes No. of "m" Values "X" Values Queue Movement Storage Length Length Passenger Heavies Heavies All Traffic Lanes Length (m) (sec.) Cars (veh) (veh) (m) Bovaird Drive @ Worthington Avenue Northbound Left 5 58 % 58.9. Southbound Left 5 65 % 8 7 8.8. 77 Eastbound Left 8 4% 8 89 6.. 8 56 Westbound Left 9 4 % 4.5. 7 Bovaird Drive @ Ashby Field Road Northbound Left 75 7 % 4 75 5.7. 7 49 Southbound Left x 68 % 68.. 4 Eastbound Left 48 5 % 7 57.7. 4 Westbound Left 96 5% 5.. 4 8 Bovaird Drive @ Mississauga Road Northbound Left x 9 4 7 6% 7 9 5.. 7 66 Southbound Left 5 4 95 % 5.7.4 5 5 Eastbound Left 5 4 8% 5 8 4.4. 6 59 Westbound Left x 5 4 8 8% 9 7.. 4 Bovaird Drive @ Heritage Road Northbound Left 88.6 9 % 9.7. 7 Southbound Left 88.6 9 % 9.5. 7 Eastbound Left 55 88.6 7 % 4 4.4. 4 8 Westbound Left 5 88.6 7 % 7.9. 4 8 5 Bovaird Drive @ Creditview Road Northbound Left 4 4 6 % 6.. Southbound Left 8 4 66 % 69 6.4. 8 56 Eastbound Left 8 4 66 % 69 4..5 7 6 Westbound Left 5 4 6 % 7 67 4.. 6 GENIVAR /6/ 9-55tab--6PeelRegionQueueSummary.xls

Bovaird Drive EA Intersection Queue Summary - Peel Region Methodology Intersection Queue Lengths, Weekday PM Peak Hour, Without North-South Transportation Corridor No. Intersection Available Cycle Volumes Percent Volumes Volumes No. of "m" Values "X" Values Queue Movement Storage Length Length Passenger Heavies Heavies All Traffic Lanes Length (m) (sec.) Cars (veh) (veh) (m) Bovaird Drive @ Worthington Avenue Northbound Left 5 7 % 7.. Southbound Left 5 89 % 6 95 6.. 8 56 Eastbound Left 49 4% 8 457 4.6.6 7 6 Westbound Left 9 75 % 75.5. Bovaird Drive @ Ashby Field Road Northbound Left 75 48 % 49.6. 4 Southbound Left x %.7. 5 5 Eastbound Left 48 4 % 6.5. 7 Westbound Left 6 5% 8 69 5.4. 7 49 Bovaird Drive @ Mississauga Road Northbound Left x 9 4 49 6% 7 456 8..5 87 Southbound Left 5 4 5 % 7 7 6..7 7 66 Eastbound Left 5 4 7 8% 5 85.7.6 4 45 Westbound Left x 5 4 468 8% 4 59 9..8 94 4 Bovaird Drive @ Heritage Road Northbound Left 88.6 8 % 8.. Southbound Left 88.6 8 % 8.. Eastbound Left 55 88.6 89 % 9.. Westbound Left 5 88.6 4 % 4.8. 7 5 Bovaird Drive @ Creditview Road Northbound Left 4 4 % 4 4.. 5 5 Southbound Left 8 4 5 % 7 59.7. 6 Eastbound Left 8 4 44 % 9 45 7..4 57 Westbound Left 5 4 84 % 86.. 4 8 GENIVAR /6/ 9-55tab--6PeelRegionQueueSummary.xls

Appendix E HP BATS EMME Model Excellence in Transportation Planning

46 96 79 76 644 58 7 55 4 9 466 96 5 9 896 99 7 5 6 79 99 79 68 8447 584 6759 9 99 8447 584 6759 9 45 98 89 47 68 5 84 689 48 5 47 49 57 44 75 7 44 65 9 7 55 87 666 5 49 9 45 67 9 6 47 67 47 57 44 8 5 9 4 4 76 8 97 8 69 4 97 47 7 85 47 76 8 44 6 49 6 68 8 858 44 5 54 88 45 884 7 4 697 48 44 5 59 7 889 945 5 78 98 55 4 5 7 65 5 569 77 54 9 48 7 6 7 5 75 598 86 95 55 9 7 96 96 46 74 88 66 44 46 69 46 9 5 44 86 46 689 487 95 8 77 88 46 9 595 49 989 9 67 49 67 5 97 96 9 5 7 8 568 49 74 47 599 88 9 4 7 975 88 6 7 7 8 5 56 84 79 999 868 584 97 56 75 455 8 97 5 47 547 55 569 468 48 46 8 645 96 4 5 944 6 57 55 688 4 89 7 9 65 9 846 5 4 5 5 6 49 54 98 7 9 458 5 4 7 78 477 94 85 77 4 98 46 65 44 64 56 54 79 5 67 8 59 45 778 6 9 5 6 4 55 85 5 4 88 56 5 656 78 68 49 989 4 89 68 58 57 89 6 77 9 55 498 4 5 48 59 4 9 94 984 8 6 8 8 9 5 4 75 86 4 8 4 986 477 4 54 78 96 47 8 875 9 9 86 7 85 5 9 8586 47 9 77 44 755 9 46 887 4 59 4 44 55 58 8 5 659 44 95 89 79 5 74 74 69 59 7 97 655 88 46 49 6 48 56 4 7 498 94 57 467 9 5 5 67 447 68 68 467 544 65 9 97 7 97 98 97 475 84 8 5 48 44 685 79 47 9 57 69 69 7 4 549 7946 7 7 76 46 6 8 668 59 45 589 8 6 66889 45 64 5 4856 655 6 84 458 5 7 656 7 6 58 87 7 96 47 946 5 47 84 56 7956 7 78 65 497 98 888 5 67 74 45 657 6 459 668 79 89 65 97 97 695 6 967 7 59 7 89 98 56 5 9 8 565 97 4 694 54 454 968 6 66 555 9 899 99 497 69 84 69 74 46 89 77 84 47 97 96 97 9 6 45 4 9 55 9 7 554 798 6 7 57 47 7 96 86 76 69 4 444 45 8 9 88 89 7 4 649 77 5 459 89 989 656 599 96 55 6 7 7 7 4 4 8 89 88 9 459 66 8 4 84 79 8 85 59 94 475 7 5 856 875 558 498 76 6 8 66 4 497 7 7 48 7 976 9 8 8 49 8 44 64 8 484 46 97 77 66 9 67 87 85 4 86 44 44 94 76 7 87 44 887 8 868 96 7 45 8 47 4 9 4 8 87 4 4 6 45 495 7 5 99 58 89 77 8 5 646 54 57 447 9 54 5 59 78 4 44 6 45 5 7 4 96 589 9 87 7 9 5 4 494 7 8 84 48 5 6 6 78 58 585 496 79 5 9 744 768 5 4 4 89 85 987 6 98 77 9 89 58 98 699 56 88 79 498 48 8 5 5 5 5 948 4 4 875 45 8 866 7 8 5 47 79 75 986 6 8 45 89 6 7 59 6 9 99 76 758 7 4 69 7 898 94 6 65 79 4 9 97 4 6 88 88 864 6 885 585 7 695 695 59 59 449 89 7 4 5 69 6 84 9 69 5 99 446 57 88 8 8 8 46 7 588 64 57 4 745 8 7 7 8 46 74 6 65 6 76 589 46 5765 6 47 4 5 76 78 99 46 468 49 46 97 968 5 574 9 8 5 44 8 5 74 47 49 6 4 5 46 5 8 5 78 7 766 88 588 4 66 5 9 6 489 64 4 586 5 4 5 64 6 48 9 67 7 64 67 4 8 68 464 7 586 4 99 69 79 84 9 5 8 67 5 799 6 859 799 9 6 76 46 9778 87 4 88 89 579 67 8 4 96 597 7 646 79 75 9 65 99 79 85 5 946 584 764 4767 4 747 85 85 6 5 7 848 4 946 4 76 75 6 4988 5 99 5 6 568 5 76 959 64 8 6 9 94 9 5 95 874 9 45 69 8 67 856 7 7 45 4 5 8 45 67 49 57 4 5 8 6 677 76 78 465 56 57 86 8 65 5 9 7 46 58 4 94 68 9 895 89 8 44 4 479 776 8 77 6 8447 694 94 65 9 66 86 66 49 86 57 499 8 495 8 495 589 694 9 98 7 9 5 46 49 5 49 49 5 HP BATS with NSTC

HP BATS without NSTC

4 4 4 4 6 5 5 5 5 6 6 6 6 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 6 6 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 Lanes

Appendix F RODEL Capacity Output Excellence in Transportation Planning

RODEL Roundabout Intersection Operations Analysis Conditions Bovaird Drive at Caseley Boulevard PM Peak Hour with North-South Transportation Corridor PM Peak Hour without North-South Transportation Corridor

Bovaird Drive at Heritage Road PM Peak Hour with North-South Transportation Corridor PM Peak Hour without North-South Transportation Corridor