The Economic Status of Women in the U.S. What Has Changed in the Last 20 40 Years March 28, 2018 Heidi Hartmann, Ph.D. President, IWPR Scholar in Residence, American University Editor, Journal of Women, Politics & Policy www.iwpr.org Informing Policy. Inspiring change. Improving lives.
By-Laws of the Institute for Women s Policy Research - 1987 Article I Purpose The purposes of the Institute for Women s Policy Research are: 1. To conduct and disseminate accessible, scholarly research on issues of concern to women, and especially to working women, low-income women, and women of color: 2. To increase understanding of the situation of all women in the economy and society in the United States and abroad; 3. To bring together members of the research and policy communities and representatives of organizations that serve women; 4. To contribute to the development of policies to improve women s opportunities.
IWPR Mission Statement The Institute for Women s Policy Research conducts and communicates research to inspire public dialogue, shape policy, and improve the lives and opportunities of women of diverse backgrounds, circumstances, and experiences.
IWPR Program Areas Over 30 Years Employment, Education, and the Economy Work and Family Poverty and Income Security Health and Safety Democracy and Society
CONTENTS 1.Political Participation 2.Employment & Earnings 3.Work & Family 4.Poverty & Opportunity 5.Reproductive Rights 6.Health & Well-Being 7.Violence & Safety 8.Recommendations
Outline 1. Progress Achieving Gender Equity in the US 2. US Compared with Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) Countries 3. Next Steps
PROGRESS ACHIEVING GENDER EQUITY IN THE UNITED STATES
Men s and Women s Labor Force Participation Rates have been Converging across Time (1950-2016) 90 Labor Force Participation Rate (%) 80 70 60 50 40 86.4% 33.9% MEN WOMEN 69.1% 57.0% 30 1950 1952 1954 1956 1958 1960 1962 1964 1966 1968 1970 1972 1974 1976 1978 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 Source: U.S. Department of Labor Bureau of Labor Statistics, Current Population Survey, 2018
Men s and Women s Jobs Over the Recent Business Cycle
Women in the Labor Force Have Invested in Education
Source: Census Bureau 2017. Men s and Women s Wages are Slowly Converging but Women s Wage Growth Slowing Down
College Education & Earnings Growing for Women & Men; Women Catching Up (1961-2011) Notes: Percent with Bachelors degree or higher includes individuals aged 25 and older. Earnings are for all full-time, year-round workers in 2012 dollars. Source: IWPR analysis of Current Population Survey Annual Social and Economic Supplement (IPUMS, University of Minnesota).
Race and Gender Differences are Still Very Significant. White Men Earn the Most. Hispanic Women Earn the Least. Source: IWPR analysis of 2017 Current Population Survey Annual Social and Economic Supplement
At Current Pace of Progress, Wage Gap for Women Expected to Close in 2059 Women s Median Earnings as a Percent of Men s 1960-2016 Full-time, Year-round Workers 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 1960 1964 1968 1972 1976 1980 1984 1988 1992 Source: IWPR analysis of data from Jessica L. Semega, Kayla R. Fontenot, and Melissa A. Kollar. 2017. U.S. Census Bureau Current Population Reports, P60-259, Income and Poverty in the United States: 2016, Table A-4. 1996 2000 2004 2008 2012 2016 2020 2024 2028 2032 2036 2040 2044 2048 2052 2056
Wage Gaps Persist for Decades for Black and Hispanic Women Relative to White Men Women s Median Earnings as a Percent of Men s 1985-2016 Full-time, Year-round Workers
Among Reasons for Lack of Recent Change: Decline in Occupational Segregation has Slowed
Whites and Asians Dominate Top 20% of Jobs By Pay; Black and Hispanics Bottom 20%; Men Outearn Women Everywhere 50% 30% 10% 10% 30% 50% Asian Top 20 Percent White Top 20 Percent 32.8% 28.6% 17.0% 24.0% Black Top 20 Percent Hispanic Top 20 Percent 13.0% 11.1% 7.0% 11.0% ALL Top 20 Percent 23.4% 15.0% Asian Bottom 20 Percent White Bottom 20 Percent Black Bottom 20 Percent 25.1% 15.4% 14.2% 22.0% 22.0% 29.0% Hispanic Bottom 20 Percent 32.1% 40.0% ALL Bottom 20 Percent 18.5% 25.0% Men Women CPS Outgoing Rotation Groups 2010.
Projected Growth of Low-Wage, Female Dominated Occupations, 2014-2024 All Occupations Low-Wage, Female-Dominated Occs 6.5% 9.5% Personal and home care aides Phlebotomists Nursing, psychiatric, & home health aides Medical assistants Misc healthcare support occs 12.5% 25.9% 24.9% 24.5% 23.5% Nonrestaurant food servers Fast Food Preparation and Serving Personal appearance workers Animal caretakers Hairstylists and cosmetologists Recreation and fitness workers Customer service representatives Receptionists and information clerks 10.9% 10.5% 9.8% 9.5% 9.8% 9.5% 10.9% 13.4% Source: Institute for Women s Policy Research analysis of United States Department of Labor Statistics Employment Projections, Occupational Projections database, and Institute for Women s Policy Research analysis of Current Population Survey, 2013-2015 Annual Social Economic Supplement
Women are 90% of Adult Low-Wage Workers and only 6.5% of the Highest Wage Workers Women as a Percent of Total in Each Earnings Category [Fifteen-Year Average Earnings Women and Men Who Worked Every Year] 100 90 Percent Total in Each Earnings Category 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 Women Men 10 0 <$15,000 $15,000-24,999 $25,000-49,999 $50,000-75,000 >$75,000 Average Annual Earnings Source: Rose, Stephen J. and Heidi I. Hartmann. 2004. Still A Man s Labor Market: The Long-Term Earnings Gap. Washington, DC: Institute for Women s Policy Research.
Women s Poverty is Especially High at Young and Old Ages but More Progress Has Been Made at Those Ages in Past 30 Years
Equalizing Pay Between Women and Men Would Cut Poverty By Half For Families With a Working Woman
US Compared to Other Countries: Poverty Rate High in US
Among the OECD Countries, the US is Among the Countries with Largest Gender Pay Gaps The gender pay gap for full-time employees 2015 Source: OECD Employment Outlook 2017
In 2013 the US had the highest percentage of Women Managers in the OECD 16.0 14.0 12.0 10.0 8.0 6.0 4.0 2.0 0.0 OECD.Stat http://stats.oecd.org/index.aspx?queryid=54752
US: Best Gender Equity in Unpaid Work Differences in Unpaid Work Hours Cross-Nationally For Workers Only 4.5 Daily hours of household and family care for workers only by gender for selected countries 4.0 3.5 3.3 3.4 3.2 3.4 3.6 3.8 3.6 3.8 3.9 3.0 2.5 2.0 2.4 2.4 2.1 2.3 2.3 2.5 2.3 2.0 1.8 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 U.S. * Norway Finland Germany Belgium France U.K. Spain Italy Men Women Notes: Sorted in ascending order of within-country gender difference in hours. Workers aged 20-74. Source: Jeffrey Hayes, IWPR, analysis of data from the European Commission (Eurostat) Harmonised European Time Use Surveys (HETUS), 2000 round, except for * Bureau of Labor Statistics American Time Use Survey 2011.
Parental Leave Packages Vary Widely Across the OECD Only the US Guarantees No Leave to Workers * Includes shared-leave which can be taken by fathers Source: The Economist https://www.economist.com/blogs/graphicdetail/2016/10/daily-chart-10
Next Steps Targets of Policy Opportunity
Raise wages in low wage jobs, via higher minimum wage, collective bargaining Strengthen antipoverty programs Encourage gender equitable family care Strengthen family leave & child care supports
Enforce and strengthen equal pay and equal employment opportunity laws, also Title IX Reintroduce comparable worth; Spread new laws preventing employers from asking about pay; Spread laws preventing pay secrecy; Move women into well-paying middle skill growing jobs; Reduce sexual harassment; Increase share of women leaders in all fields.
States with More Women in Legislature have Higher Wage Ratio and Smaller Pay Gap Percentage of Women in State Legislature vs. Earnings Ratio by State Source: IWPR analysis of 2016 IPUMS American Community. Center for American Women and Politics, Women in State Legislatures 2018. (http://www.cawp.rutgers.edu/women-state-legislature-2018 )
Another Approach Political Power
US Ranked 93 of 181 in the World on Women in National Legislature Percent Women in Legislature 60 50 40 30 20 53.6 % 50.9% 45.0% 43.2% 42.9% 16.8% 16.8% 16.4% 16.1% 16.0% 10 0 Source: Human Development Report 2011
At Current Pace of Progress Women in Congress Will Reach Parity in 2114 Women s Share of Seats in Congress, 1960-2018 with Projection Source: IWPR analysis of data from Women in the U.S. Congress 2015. Fact sheet from Center for American Women and Politics, Eagleton Institute of Politics, Rutgers University (Updated with 2018 data point. http://www.cawp.rutgers.edu/current-numbers )
More Targets of Policy Opportunity More support for women candidates Vote and Run! Possible electoral reforms Public financing Required number of women on party slates Multi-member districts at the local level Rank choice voting (vote your 1 st, 2 nd, 3 rd choice)