Institutional Review Board Responsibilities in making the Significant Risk and Non-significant Risk Device Determination

Similar documents
Date Effective 4/21/2008 Identification

HUD and HDE Topics. Humanitarian Use Device and. Humanitarian Use Device. Humanitarian Device Exemption

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN S E RVICES, 'mgr,':~~ MAY WARNING LETTE R

Policy Number: 42 Title: Investigational Devices Date of Last Revision: 06/12/2008; 07/22/2010; 05/29/2013; 05/01/2016; 10/16/2018

SOP Title Review of Research: Devices for Humanitarian Uses

Humanitarian Use Devices Made Simple

Via Federal Express Rockville, MD 20850

IRB Training October 22, 2015

JUN L WARNING LETTER VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS

Reporting an Unanticipated Problem Involving Risks to Subjects or Others (UPIRTSO) to the IRB

Information Sheet Guidance For IRBs, Clinical Investigators, and Sponsors

Food and Drug Administration Center for Devices an d * 1Ya I a Radiological Health WARNING LETTE R

EMERGENCY USE 03/02/2016

Institutional Review Board - Restriction s Impo sed

Inspections, Compliance, Enforcement, and Criminal Investigations

510(k) SUMMARY K EIDOSMVED LLC OEC EDG Depth Gauge Page 1 of 2, 510(k) Summary

Guidance for IRBs, Clinical Investigators, and Sponsors IRB Continuing Review after Clinical Investigation Approval

7.0 DEVIATION and EXCEPTION of a PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PROTOCOL

FDA > CDRH > CFR Title 21 Database Search. Registration Listing Adverse Events Advisory Committees. 21 CFR Part 56

Independent Ethics Committees

Current Status: Active PolicyStat ID: Origination: 04/2018 Effective: 04/2018 Approved: 04/2018 Last Revised: 04/2018 Expiration: 04/2021

Yale University Human Research Protection Program

External IRB Instructions for the Registration Pathway in OSIRIS

Presented by Alena Filip IRB Coordinator Office of Research San Jose State University

Chapter 4 Institutional Review Board (IRB) Roles and Authorities

Research Involving Human Subjects: AA 110.7

IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY Institutional Review Board. Policy on IRB Review of Protocol Deviations and Noncompliance for Non-exempt Research

Initial Review. Approved By: Michele Kennett, JD, MSN, LLM Associate Vice Chancellor for Research. Table of Contents

CONTINUING REVIEW OF APPROVED IRB PROTOCOLS

Effective Date: January 16, 2012 Policy Number: MHC_RP0107. Revised Date: November 2, 2015 Oversight Level: Corporate

Issue in IRB Approvals:

Investigator Manual. If you have questions about whether an activity requires IRB review, contact the IRB Office.

21 CFR Part 56 - Institutional Review Boards

UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD CONTINUING REVIEW OF RESEARCH

NONCOMPLIANCE. 1. Overview

Administrative Hold, Suspension, or Termination of IRB Approval

CONTINUING REVIEW 3/7/2016

Wayne State University Institutional Review Board

the HRPP Director will prepare a draft report within three (3) workdays after the IRB meeting at which the determination occurred.

What s New in GCP? FDA, OHRP Issue Harmonized Guidance on Transferring IRB Oversight of Clinical Studies

SOP 801: Investigator Qualifications and Responsibilities

I. Summary. II. Responsibilities

Institutional Review Board Standard Operating Procedure. Suspension and Termination of IRB Approval

Central IRBs: Where Does the UR Fit into the Picture?? Kelley O Donoghue Tiffany Gommel Emily Flagg April 15 th 2015

UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA Institutional Review Board

Investigator Manual Version date: April 1, 2010

UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD CONTINUING REVIEW AND REAPPROVAL OF RESEARCH

Human Subjects in Research Review and Monitoring Form. Not applicable

THE DUHS IRB REVIEW PROCESS 8/13/2014

A Guide to Medaille College s Institutional Review Board (IRB)

Study Management SM STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR Interactions with the Institutional Review Board (IRB)

IV. Basic Procedures for Human Research Protections

SOP 5.06 Full Committee Review: Initial IRB Review

(y9. &i?r, JUL t Certified-Return Receipt Requested WARNING LE7TER

Michigan State University Human Research Protection Program

UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD PROCEDURES FOR FULL BOARD REVIEW

CONTINUING REVIEW CRITERIA FOR RENEWAL

Reliance on Independent/Central IRBs for Multicenter Clinical Trials

Children s Hospital of Philadelphia Committees for the Protection of Human Subjects Policies and Procedures. IRB Review Processes

2.0 Institutional Review Board

I. Summary. II. Responsibilities

SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH

SOP 407: PROTOCOL DEVIATIONS AND UNANTICIPATED PROBLEMS

University of Pennsylvania Institutional Review Board. Reliance Agreement Guidance: How to Apply for External IRB Review

IRB MEETING ADMINISTRATION

OHRP Guidance on Written IRB Procedures

University of Pennsylvania Institutional Review Board. Reliance Agreement Guidance: Post-Approval Submissions

INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD MANUAL: PURPOSE and POLICIES.

Centralized IRB Models

The IRB reviews and monitors human subjects research conducted by Columbia College Chicago faculty, staff, and students.

Effective Date Revisions Date Review by the Convened Institutional Review Board

Pepperdine University eprotocol - IRB Student Investigator User Guide

IRB Minutes Quality Improvement Assessment

Ceded IRB Review. The project involves prisoners or other vulnerable populations that require special considerations.

Institutional Review Board (IRB) Non-affiliated Member Nomination

SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTION PROGRAM STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES 02 06/30/10 08/01/07 1 OF 6

Ceded IRB Review. The University of Arizona has standing agreements in place for the following entities regarding ceded IRB review:

HEALTH CARE SYSTEMS RESEARCH NETWORK

CUNY HRPP Policy: Suspension or Termination of Human Subject Research

University of Kentucky Office of Research Integrity and Institutional Review Board Standard Operating Procedures SOP #4-1 Revision #6

University of Wisconsin Colleges Administrative Policy #56 NON-COMPLIANCE IN HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH

Version 1. Submission Guide and Policies

Tuesday, May 15, Please be sure to sign in and take copies of each handout.

IRB COMPOSITION AND IRB MEMBER ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES

SMART IRB Agreement Implementation Checklist and Documentation Tool

1. Review and approval of the consent document is a responsibility that FDA assigns to the IRB with jurisdiction

2 Institutional Review Board

INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD (IRB) PROCEDURES

FDA Violation 1: 1. The IRB failed to fulfill membership requirements [21 CFR ]

Info Sheet - Operations Office for Human Research Studies

AMENDMENTS TO PREVIOUSLY APPROVED RESEARCH 3/01/2016

The Top 10 Human Research Protection Compliance Risks

IRB APPLICATION CHECKLIST

Your Roadmap to Single IRB Review Serving as a Reviewing IRB

CAPA Plans: Solutions, not Blame

To assure knowledge and compliance by documenting the annual administrative review and continuing IRB review of non-exempt projects for the IRB.

SOP #2-2 Version #1 Date First Effective: December 14, Page 1 of 6

DOCUMENTATION OF IRB DISCUSSIONS AND DECISIONS ( IRB MINUTES)

Human Research Protections Program Medical College of Wisconsin and Froedtert Memorial Lutheran Hospital

eirb User Manual Kaiser Permanente Institutional Review Boards Georgia Hawaii Northwest

Transcription:

Institutional Review Board Responsibilities in making the Significant Risk and Non-significant Risk Device Determination Marian Serge, RN Nurse Consultant Division of Bioresearch Monitoring Office of Compliance Center for Devices and Radiological Health 1

Topics Background Define SR and NSR device studies IRB Responsibilities What IRB s consider when making the SR/NSR determination Documentation of IRB determination How to find 510(k) and PMA labeling 2

Background Investigational Device Exemption (IDE) Regulation is found Title 21 CFR 812 Sponsor and IRB responsibilities for NSR device determination Why provide this information? Improve IRB understanding of responsibility Improve compliance with FDA regulation IRB serves as FDA surrogate for NSR device investigations Providing initial and continuing review 3

Significant Risk Device Definition at 812 Presents a potential serious risk to the health, safety, or welfare of a subject and is: an implant; or life-supporting or life-sustaining; or of substantial importance in diagnosing, curing, mitigating, or treating disease or preventing impairment of human health 4

What is a Non-Significant Risk Device? One that does not meet the definition of a significant risk device 5

Who Decides Whether a Device is SR or NSR? Sponsors Make the initial risk determination Present the IRB with this information IRBs Required to determine whether the NSR device study involves a SR or NSR device FDA Available to help Final arbiter 6

What are the Requirements in 21 CFR 812 for NSR Device Studies? Abbreviated requirements at 21CFR 812.2(b) Labeling, IRB approval, informed consent, monitoring, record keeping, reports, and prohibition against promotion. NSR studies are considered to have an approved IDE therefore no formal IDE application to FDA is necessary Sponsors and IRBs do not have to advise FDA of NSR device studies IRBs must make a SR or NSR device determination for every NSR device study (21 CFR 812.66) 7

What is the sponsor s responsibility to the IRB for NSR device studies? Provide reviewing IRBs with a brief explanation of why the device is not a SR Any other information requested by the IRB Description of device Reports of prior investigations Proposed investigational plan Subject selection criteria Inform IRB if FDA determined the study to be NSR 8

IRB responsibilities for NSR device studies Review materials (see previous slide) Make risk determination Document determination in meeting minutes 9

Process to use when requesting FDA s assistance when making the risk determination See handout Information to be submitted to FDA Cover letter and reference line Your address and contact info 60 or fewer days to make the determination CDRH letter with determination CDRH contact person: Sheila.Brown@fda.hhs.gov 10

What Should IRBs Consider When Making the SR or NSR Determination? For studies presented as NSR device studies, IRBs should consider: What is the basis for the risk? Proposed use of device What is nature of harm that may result from the use of the device? Additional procedures Potential harm from procedures 11

Let s Put This into Practice Study of a change in a component of a device. For example: new leads, battery pack, or software of an approved pacemaker Basis for risk: Any change to a component is a change to the device itself This study is significant risk and requires IDE approval by FDA 12

More Practice Study of a 510k, non-significant risk, daily wear lens device to be used as overnight lens. Design changes. A review of the proposed use and nature of harm reveals a potential for injury not normally seen with daily wear lens This study is significant risk and requires IDE approval by FDA 13

What Happens When the Sponsor and IRB Determination Disagree? If the IRB determines that a NSR device study involves a SR device IRB must inform the clinical investigator and where appropriate the sponsor Sponsors contact FDA for final risk determination The study cannot start until sponsor obtains an IDE 14

What Happens When the IRB Agrees with the Sponsor s NSR Determination? If IRB determination of NSR agrees with sponsor s NSR IRB can review the study using criteria at 21 CFR 56.111 The study may begin without notice to FDA or IDE application to FDA 15

How do IRBs Document the SR or NSR Determination? Write determination in minutes Give reason for determination Lastly, maintain all materials reviewed 16

Approved devices used in research How can IRBs find 510(k) or PMA approval orders and indications for use? www.fda.gov Click on Medical Devices Click on Device Advice Click on premarket notification 510(k) Click on premarket approvals (PMA) Complete 510(k) or PMA numbers 17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

32

33

There is no Website for you to search for information about investigational devices (IDE) used in research. FDA holds that information confidential. 34

References FDA Information Sheets http://www.fda.gov/oc/gcp/default.htm 35

Summary Distinction between significant risk (SR) and non-significant risk (NSR) Criteria IRB should use when making SR or NSR determination How to document IRB s determination of SR or NSR How to find 510(k) and PMA labeling 36

Questions 37