THE FOOTBALL ASSOCIATION. and MR ARSENE WENGER

Similar documents
THE FOOTBALL ASSOCIATION. and MANCHESTER CITY FOOTBALL CLUB; CHELSEA FOOTBALL CLUB.

Football Association Independent Regulatory Commission. (the Commission )

Football Association Independent Regulatory Commission. (the Commission )

Football Association Independent Regulatory Commission. (the Commission )

Football Association Disciplinary Commission

NON-PERSONAL HEARING THE FOOTBALL ASSOCIATION. and. Mr MARTIN SKRTEL Liverpool FC T H E D E C I S I O N A N D R E A S O N S

THE FOOTBALL ASSOCIATION -and- MR PAUL BIGNOT WRITTEN REASONS OF THE REGULATORY COMMISSION

Football Operations:

ON-FIELD REGULATIONS SECTION THREE: PROVISIONS APPLICABLE TO CATEGORY 5 GENERAL CHARGES. 2 Nothing in this Section Three shall preclude:

RFU SHORT JUDGMENT FORM RFU REGULATION 19

The FA Discipline Handbook 2011/12 Season

Disciplinary Procedures For Players in Scottish Women s Football Youth Regional Leagues. Season 2016

FA Charter Standard Discipline & Respect Sanction Process 2015/16

Disciplinary Procedures for Players in Scottish Women s Football Youth Leagues. Season 2018

2014 Misconduct Regulations

PLEA IN MITIGATION HEARING THE FOOTBALL ASSOCIATION. and. Mr DEXTER BLACKSTOCK Nottingham Forest FC T H E D E C I S I O N A N D R E A S O N S

GPT NOTICE OF DETERMINATION.

Step 5 & 6 Match-Based Suspension Guide

MEMBERSHIP RULES. Each Club shall on or before 31 May in each year shall be affiliated to the Association, providing such information as required.

DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE FOOTBALL FEDERATION OF AUSTRALIA DETERMINATION IN THE FOLLOWING MATTER:

JUDICIARY COMMITTEE GUIDELINES (Amended February 2010)

RFU SHORT JUDGMENT FORM RFU REGULATION 19

ON-FIELD DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURES PART 1

YORKSHIRE AMATEUR ASSOCIATION FOOTBALL LEAGUE Founded 1928

Woody s Wanderers FC - Code of Conduct

Sam Kimberley Trophy

Westfield FFA Cup Disciplinary Rules

IN THE MATTER OF RUGBY FOOTBALL UNION DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS CONCERNING RULE 5.12 RUGBY FOOTBALL UNION DANNY LIGAIRI-BADHAM JUDGMENT

APPENDIX 6. RFU REGULATION 19 DISCIPLINE Appendix 6 AGE-GRADE RUGBY DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURES. 1. Applicability and Overriding Objective

QUEENSLAND MASTERS FOOTBALL. Disciplinary Policy 2016

IN THE MATTER OF PROCEEDINGS BROUGHT UNDER THE ICC ANTI-CORRUPTION CODE. Between: THE INTERNATIONAL CRICKET COUNCIL. and MR IRFAN AHMED DECISION

ICC UMPIRES CODE OF CONDUCT

BUNDABERG JUNIOR RUGBY LEAGUE RULES (to commence 2010)

RULES OF THE KENT FA SUNDAY CUPS (SUNDAY PREMIER CUP, SUNDAY JUNIOR CUP AND SUNDAY JUNIOR TROPHY)

RFU SHORT JUDGMENT FORM RFU REGULATION 19

Part F: Rules Regarding Suspensions for Serious Foul Play, Violent Conduct, Spitting

CRICKET SCOTLAND CODE OF CONDUCT FOR PLAYERS AND TEAM OFFICIALS

b) the disciplinary procedure should be simple, easy to understand and conducted more informally than the adult procedure;

APPENDIX 6. RFU REGULATION 19 DISCIPLINE Appendix 6 AGE-GRADE RUGBY DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURES. 1. Applicability and Overriding Objective

RFU SHORT JUDGMENT FORM RFU REGULATION 19

CODES OF CONDUCT AND PENALTIES ADAPTED FROM SACA GRADE CRICKET BYLAWS PREAMBLE

England and Wales Cricket Board MODEL DISCIPLINE REGULATIONS

2018 Minor Directorate Disciplinary Rules and CLA Rule Interpretations

T RIPPON MID-ESSEX CRICKET LEAGUE

IFA Disciplinary Code Season 2018/2019

Respect Guide for Youth Football Clubs. Your guide to The FA s Respect programme

Minor Directorate 2008 Disciplinary Rules and Rule Interpretation

1.1.1 Appeal Panel means the appeal panel appointed by the Union under the Disciplinary Rules;

DISCIPLINE COMPLAINTS AND APPEALS PROCEDURES

BRIDPORT RUGBY FOOTBALL CLUB DISCIPLINE POLICY

RFU SHORT JUDGMENT FORM RFU REGULATION 19

RFU SHORT JUDGMENT FORM RFU REGULATION 19

Discipline Guidance for RFU Clubs

In the matter of the Rugby Football Union Disciplinary proceedings concerning RFU Rule 5.12

RULES AND REGULATIONS 2014/2015

IN THE MATTER OF PROCEEDINGS BROUGHT UNDER THE ANTI-DOPING RULES OF THE RUGBY FOOTBALL LEAGUE DECISION

CODES OF CONDUCT AND PENALTIES

REGULATIONS FOR THE REGISTRATION AND CONTROL OF REFEREES

RFU SHORT JUDGMENT FORM RFU REGULATION 19 AMENDED FOR PUBLICATION

RFU AASE LEAGUE COMPETITION REGULATIONS

GENERAL PURPOSES TRIBUNAL OF FOOTBALL NEW SOUTH WALES FINAL DETERMINATION IN THE FOLLOWING MATTER: GPT 15/44

FFSA Respect Program Guidelines

Disciplinary Regulations

WELSH PREMIER DEVELOPMENT LEAGUE CONSTITUTION AND RULES

FOR SCHOOL DISTRICT PERSONNEL. The penalties that may be imposed by the State Executive Committee on school district personnel found to have caused

CRICKET SCOTLAND CODE OF CONDUCT FOR PLAYERS AND TEAM OFFICIALS

Weedon Football Club Code of Conduct

Regulation REGULATION NAME

THE FOOTBALL ASSOCIATION DISCIPLINE PROCESS FOR SMALL-SIDED FOOTBALL

SECTION A &B USSA FOOTBALL NATIONAL INSTITUTIONAL GAMES NATIONAL INSTITUTIONAL GAMES COMPETITION RULES AND REGULATIONS

ECB PREMIER LEAGUE DISCIPLINARY REGULATIONS

SAASL DISCIPLINARY RULES FOR PLAYERS AND CLUBS

Gloucestershire RFU. Wadworth 6X League Regulations. In ALL matters the League Secretaries should be the first point of contact

AFL Coaches Code of Conduct

Reporting Discrimination

Cranbrook Sports Club Cranbrook Rugby Football Club

RFL ON FIELD COMPLIANCE PROCEDURES and SENTENCING GUIDELINES 2016

IFO COMPLAINT REF: 17/10

West Riding County Football Association. Rules for ALL County Cup Competitions

Telephone Hearing on Friday 24 June 2016

ISU Disciplinary Commission. Case No Decision of the ISU Disciplinary Commission. In the matter of. against.

The FA Respect CODE OF CONDUCT

RFU SHORT JUDGMENT FORM RFU REGULATION 19

RFU Short Judgment Form

OTTAWA DISTRICT MINOR HOCKEY ASSOCIATION Code of Discipline Code of Discipline. 43 tel: (613)

Geraldton Hockey Association [Inc.] 2017 BY-LAWS

FIFE FOOTBALL DEVELOPMENT LEAGUE CONSTITUTION & RULES

Bank of England Rugby Football Club

The Scottish Youth Football Association DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURES

Cheshire Walking Football

Jamberoo Touch Incorporated Judiciary Rules & Procedures

Disputes and Disciplinary Regulations 27 February 2018

Disciplinary Policy and Procedures

Reporting Discrimination

SPECIAL GENERAL MEETING OF THE NEW SOUTH WALES ICE HOCKEY ASSOCIATION Inc. to be held at on Sunday 22 nd February 2004 at Blacktown Ice Arena

DERBYSHIRE COUNTY F A Season WOMENS CUP & PLATE COMPETITION

Australian Rugby Union. Code of Conduct By-Laws

NEW ENGLAND RUGBY INCORPORATED BY LAWS. Rule 3: METHOD OF CONDUCTING THE COMPETITION & FINAL SERIES

Gloucestershire RFU Reserve League Regulations

JSFA Code of Conduct. Dear League Participant

Transcription:

IN THE MATTER OF A FOOTBALL ASSOCIATION INDEPENDENT REGULATORY COMMISSION BETWEEN: THE FOOTBALL ASSOCIATION and MR ARSENE WENGER WRITTEN REASONS AND DECISION OF THE INDEPENDENT REGULATORY COMMISSION FOLLOWING THE HEARING ON 5 JANUARY 2018 1

Background 1. These are the written reasons for a decision made by an Independent Regulatory Commission which sat by WebEx on 5 January 2018. 2. The Regulatory Commission members were Mr Gareth Farrelly, Chairman and Independent Football Panel Member, Mr Udo Onwere, Independent Football Panel Member and Mr Tony Agana, Independent Football Panel Member. 3. Mr Mark Ives of the FA Judicial Services Department acted as Secretary to the Regulatory Commission. 4. By letter dated 2 January 2018, The Football Association ( The FA ) charged Mr Arsene Wenger with Misconduct for a breach of FA Rule E3 in respect of the Premier League fixture between West Bromwich Albion FC v Arsenal FC on Sunday 31 December 2017. 5. It was alleged that Mr Wenger s language and/or behaviour in the Match Officials changing room after the end of the fixture was abusive and/or improper and/or questioned the integrity of the Match Referee. 6. The FA designated this as a Non Standard Case due to a previous breach of FA Rule E3 which had taken place in a Premier League fixture v Burnley FC on 22 January 2017, and also the aggressive nature of the reported behaviour. 7. In the Extraordinary Incident Report Form the Referee, Mr Michael Dean stated As we ve entered the dressing room after the game Mr Wenger stood behind us in the doorway and told the West Brom steward to let him in. He was very aggressive leaning towards me, pointing aggressively at me saying you re not honest on numerous occasions. I replied so you re calling me a cheat. He replied I maintain what I say, you re not honest. He then said you ve done this to us many times before, you re supposed to be professional, you re a disgrace. He was then ushered out of the room by the West Brom safety officer. 8. This was further supported by Assistant Referee, Mr Simon Long in his Extraordinary Incident Report where he stated that At the conclusion of the match, we entered our dressing room, immediately followed by Mr Wenger, the manager of Arsenal. He stood in the dressing room doorway, preventing the West Bromwich Albion stewards from closing the door, whilst demanding let me in. Mr Wenger took a step inside the dressing room and aggressively confronted the referee, Mr Dean, leaning towards him and continuously jabbing his finger towards his chest whilst repeatedly saying you re not honest in a raised voice. Mr Dean 2

responded by stating so you re calling me a cheat?, to which Mr Wenger responded I maintain what I say. Mr Wenger continued his aggressive tone and went on to say you ve done this to us many times before. You re supposed to be professional, you re a disgrace. Mr Wenger was then ushered out of the dressing room by the Safety Officer of West Bromwich Albion, who closed the door behind Mr Wenger. 9. The other Assistant Referee, Mr Ian Hussin in his Extraordinary Incident Report stated Upon entering the referee s dressing room, Mr Wenger (Arsenal Manager) followed ourselves and was standing in the doorway and said to the West Bromwich Albion stewards to let me in. Mr Wenger was aggressively leaning towards Mr Dean (Referee) pointing at him and saying you re not honest several times. Mr Dean replied saying so you re calling me a cheat? Mr Wenger replied I maintain what I say, you re not honest. Mr Wenger further commented saying you ve done this to us many times before, you re supposed to be professional, you re a disgrace. Mr Wenger was then escorted away from the dressing room by the West Bromwich Albion Safety Officer. 10. For completeness, the Fourth Official, Mr Christopher Kavanagh in his Extraordinary Incident Report stated As we entered the dressing room after the final whistle Mr Wenger appeared in the doorway telling the stewards to let him in. As he entered his body language was very aggressive. He started pointing at the Referee and shouting you are not honest continuously. Mr Dean replied so you re calling me a cheat? Mr Wenger replied I maintain what I say, you are not honest. He continued you are supposed to be a professional referee, you are a disgrace. Mr Dean then asked Mr Wenger to leave the dressing room and was ushered out the door. 11. The Charge was admitted on 4 January 2018. 12. Mr Wenger did not request a personal hearing and the case was dealt with on the papers only. 13. Arsenal FC submitted a detailed letter in response to the Charge. The Club also included a statement from Mr Wenger himself, a copy of the Premier League Delegate Report from the game in question and the Written Reasons from a previous case of a similar nature, the contents of which were read and noted. 3

14. The Regulatory Commission were informed of the previous sanction imposed on Mr Wenger for a breach of Rule E3 which occurred from a fixture against Burnley on 22 January 2017. On that occasion Mr Wenger was sanctioned with a four match touchline ban and fined 25,000. 15. The Regulatory Commission considered all of the evidence presented and ruled there to be a number of critical points. It is accepted that Match Officials at all levels have a difficult role as do football managers. However, Mr Wenger, as per his written statement, is an incredibly experienced football manager. He has occupied this position since 1996. This is his second Misconduct Charge within a twelve-month period. Whilst arguable, it is not accepted that there is ambiguity of interpretation in the language used based on English not being Mr Wenger s first language. There is simply no justification for this behaviour. 16. Due to the serious nature of the breach the Regulatory Commission were minded to impose additional terms to any sporting sanction. The Commission discussed a possible stadium ban but agreed it was not warranted in this case. However, in the event of a further incident of this nature, it is expected that a Regulatory Commission would consider this. The Commission then considered if a Standard touchline suspension should be imposed or if an Extended touchline suspension was more appropriate. For clarity, an Extended touchline suspension covers the following in addition to the terms of a Standard : During a period of an extended touchline suspension a Participant, in addition to the [Standard] restrictions, may not: - Enter the changing rooms or Field of Play at any time from 30 minutes prior to kick-off to 30 minutes following the end of the match, including extra time and kicks from the penalty mark. This also includes the half time period. 17. The Members also noted the Standard Penalty Guidelines for Technical Area occupants and/or tunnel incidents at Premier League level. Standard Penalty 1, including abusive/insulting language, is where the charge is admitted and the Standard Penalty is accepted; this incurs a one match touchline ban and an 8,000 fine. Standard Penalty 2, including abusive/insulting language, is where the charge is denied but subsequently found proven by a Regulatory Commission; this incurs a two match touchline ban and an 12,000 fine. As this was a Non-Standard charge, the Commission had a complete discretion on sanction. 18. The Regulatory Commission decided that on this occasion a Standard touchline ban was appropriate for Mr Wenger. Given the reported behaviour, whilst noting all the aggravating factors, in particular questioning the integrity of the Match Referee, the Members considered a four match touchline ban to be appropriate. However, acknowledging that the charge was admitted, along with the additional mitigation submitted by the club, credit was given by way of a one match reduction; therefore, a three match touchline ban was the sporting sanction considered fair and proportionate having noted all the relevant factors. The same principle applied to the financial 4

penalty and, whilst noting Mr Wenger s weekly football income, 50,000 was reduced to 40,000. Conclusion 19. The Regulatory Commission came to a unanimous decision, having carefully considered all of the evidence, and have imposed the following sanction on Mr Wenger: (i) He is immediately suspended from the touchline, until such time as Arsenal FC have completed three (3) first team competitive matches in approved competitions; and (ii) Fined the sum of 40,000. 20. This decision is subject to the relevant Appeal Regulations. Mr Gareth Farrelly, Chairman Mr Udo Onwere Mr Tony Agana 10 January 2018 5