ATTACHMENT 4 - TDM Checklist. TDM Checklist Overview

Similar documents
WELCOME. City of Greater Sudbury. Transportation Demand Management Plan

CPC Parking Lot Riverside Drive. Transportation Rationale

Final. TDM for Development. Prepared for City of Hamilton by IBI Group

Stakeholder Meeting Handouts. January 2013

How To Encourage More Efficient Transportation in Brazilian Cities

Transportation, Parking & Roads

Introduction. Using the Checklist. TDM-Supportive Development Design and Infrastructure Checklist Version 1.0 (30 June 2017) City of Ottawa

Capital and Strategic Planning Committee. Item III - B. April 12, WMATA s Transit-Oriented Development Objectives

Exhibit 1 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM

Transportation Master Plan Advisory Task Force

In station areas, new pedestrian links can increase network connectivity and provide direct access to stations.

Access BART: TOD and Improved Connections. October 29, 2008

Ann Arbor Downtown Street Plan

PLANNING AROUND RAPID TRANSIT STATIONS (PARTS) TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT STRATEGY

Chapter 7. Transportation. Transportation Road Network Plan Transit Cyclists Pedestrians Multi-Use and Equestrian Trails

Welcome. Background. Goals. Vision

Bicycle Master Plan Goals, Strategies, and Policies

Prepared For: Shieldbay Developments Inc. c/o Matson, McConnell Ltd. 2430A Bloor Street West Toronto, Ontario M6S 1P9.

APPENDIX B. TDM Existing Conditions

A CHANGING CITY. of Edmonton, it is essential that it reflects the long-term vision of the City.

Incentive Zoning. Zoning Ordinance Advisory Committee June 21, Pam Thompson, Senior Planner, Sustainable Development and Construction

Chapter 2. Bellingham Bicycle Master Plan Chapter 2: Policies and Actions

CITY OF COCOA BEACH 2025 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. Section VIII Mobility Element Goals, Objectives, and Policies

City of Waterloo Complete Streets Policy

Moving Cambridge. City of Cambridge Transportation Master Plan Public Consultation Centre. March 7, :00 8:00 PM.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT IN SMITHS FALLS, ONTARIO; A COMPARISON BETWEEN TWO SITES


Centennial Neighbourhoods Transportation Management Plan Summary of Phase 1 Consultation. Overview of Issues

Launceston's Transport Futures. Greater travel options for the people of Launceston

Markham Sports, Entertainment and Cultural Centre Transportation Overview

WELCOME TO OPEN HOUSE # 1 June 14, 2017

Arlington s Master Transportation Plan

Appendix A-K Public Information Centre 2 Materials

CITY OF BLOOMINGTON COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

T1-A - Service Reduction (Re-sizing)

CONNECTING PEOPLE TO PLACES

NM-POLICY 1: Improve service levels, participation, and options for non-motorized transportation modes throughout the County.

Chapter 4 Transportation Strategies to Support Growth

Standing Committee on Policy and Strategic Priorities. Mount Pleasant Industrial Area Parking Strategy and Access Improvements

BUILDING THE CASE FOR TRAVEL OPTIONS IN WASHING TON COUNTY. Image: Steve Morgan. Image: Steve Morgan

21.07 TRANSPORT CONNECTIVITY AND INFRASTRUCTURE

WELCOME! To the Centennial Neighbourhoods Secondary Plan and Transportation Management Plan Information Centre. City of Hamilton

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY CRITERIA

A Selection Approach for BRT Parking Lots Nicolls Road Corridor Parking Study

January Project No

12 RECOMMENDATIONS Road Improvements. Short Term (generally the next five years)

TRANSPORTATION NEEDS ASSESSMENT

Bicycle and Pedestrian Access in Transit Oriented Developments. Bruce Wright Chairman, Fairfax Advocates for Better Bicycling April, 2009

February 4, Community Meeting August 2, :30 6:10 Presentation

Sustainable Transportation Initiatives and Plans in Caledon

Introduction. Using the Checklist. TDM Measures Checklist Version 1.0 (30 June 2017) City of Ottawa

Welcome. If you have any questions or comments on the project, please contact:

92% COMMUTING IN THE METRO. Congested Roadways Mode Share. Roadway Congestion & Mode Share

NEWMARKET UPHAM S CORNER

NEWMARKET CENTRE Mobility Hub Profile

Roadways. Roadways III.

2.40 Cycle parking - section 32 evaluation for the Proposed Auckland Unitary Plan

Solana Beach Comprehensive Active Transportation Strategy (CATS)

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION

TRAVEL PLAN: CENTRAL EUROPEAN UNIVERSITY CAMPUS REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT TRAVEL PLAN. Central European University Campus Redevelopment Project.

West Village Mobility & Integration

V o l u m e I I - R e c o m m e n d a t i o n s January 2006 City of Madison Comprehensive Plan

Sixth Line Development - Transit Facilities Plan

Nomination. Halton Region in Context

DRAFT for a State Policy for Healthy Spaces and Places

June 3, Attention: David Hogan City of San Mateo 330 W. 2oth Avenue San Mateo, CA 94403

Item to be Addressed Checklist Consideration YES NO N/A Required Description Complete Streets Guidelines

WELCOME. Purpose of the Open House. Update you on the project. Present a draft recommended plan. Receive your input

complete streets design and construction standards public primer City of Edmonton

Berkeley Strategic Transportation Plan A-76

Cities Connect. Cities Connect! How Urbanity Supports Social Inclusion

Corpus Christi Metropolitan Transportation Plan Fiscal Year Introduction:

2018 Transportation Survey October 17, Prepared by:

BELFAST RAPID TRANSIT. Ciarán de Búrca Director, Transport Projects Division Department for Regional Development

Complete Streets. Designing Streets for Everyone. Sarnia

MEETING Agenda. Introductions. Project Overview. Key Study Components. Alternative Station Concepts. Preferred Station Concept. Next Steps.

CHAPTER 7.0 IMPLEMENTATION

Active Transportation Infrastructure Investment A Business Case

GOAL 2A: ESTABLISH AND MAINTAIN A SAFE, CONVENIENT, AND EFFICIENT MULTI-MODAL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM TO MOVE PEOPLE AND GOODS THROUGHOUT THE CITY.

Measuring and Communicating Mobility:

Town of Milton. Derry Green Corporate Business Park Secondary Plan. Transportation Strategy Report Final. December 2010

Win-Win Transportation Solutions

TORONTO WALKING STRATEGY

Providence Downtown Transit Connector STAKEHOLDER MEETING #2. Stakeholder Meeting #1 October 24, 2016

Purpose and Need. Chapter Introduction. 2.2 Project Purpose and Need Project Purpose Project Need

7 Complete Streets & Roadway Aesthetics

Welcome! Public Open House on UBC s Transportation Plan

Classification Criteria

Cherry Creek Transportation and Land Use Forum September 25, 2013 Meeting Summary

Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC) November 21, 2013

TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT POLICY. City Planning and Development Department Kansas City, Missouri

Illustrated Principles of Good Planning

York Region Population and Employment Growth

JOINT PARTNERSHIPS: Working Together To Support Light Rail in Santa Monica

Encouragement. Chapter 4. Education Encouragement Enforcement Engineering & Facilities Evaluation & Planning. Encouragement Chapter 4

Proposed. City of Grand Junction Complete Streets Policy. Exhibit 10

El Centro Mobility Hub

Community Task Force July 25, 2017

Creating walkable, bikeable and transit-supportive communities in Halton

Exceeding expectations: The growth of walking in Vancouver and creating a more walkable city in the future through EcoDensity

Transcription:

ATTACHMENT 4 - TDM Checklist TDM Checklist Overview The proposed checklist rates developments on the degree to which they are TDM and transit supportive. Points are assigned based on the level of transit service available, whether cycling and pedestrian amenities are provided, and whether parking rates and parking facilities support walking and transit use. The TDM Checklist is intended to be part of the standard development application review process as part of a Transportation Impact Study (TIS). It could also be used for a zoning by-law amendment, plan of subdivision, or through the site plan approval process. The TDM Checklist is weighted to encourage sites with access to transit to provide parking rates consistent with the mode split targets of the Transportation Master Plan; these transit-supportive parking rates may be lower than the approved zoning by-law minimums. The Checklist includes several elements to help developments achieve a TDM-supportive designation for their TIS that complements urban design guidelines, such as locating the building facade adjacent to the road right-of-way, or by providing: Preferential carpool spaces Bike parking Car sharing spaces Mixed uses with retail, commercial and food services Structured, higher-density parking Shower and change room facilities for active commuters This list could grow if the recommended TDM program is implemented and new services or options are added. The Checklist also encourages developers to provide trip reduction incentives such as subsidized transit passes, emergency ride home services, and online carpool matching. A TIS satisfactory to the City would use customized combinations of these options to complete the TDM Checklist and to demonstrate that the proposed development is transit-supportive. Benefits of the TDM Checklist Provides transportation choice the proposed TDM strategy will support the City s strategic objective to provide transportation choice and to support sustainable and vibrant urban spaces. The proposed strategy will encourage new developments to consider all modes of travel and to consider reducing the traffic impact of their site and related parking provisions. Promotes compact development reductions in parking supply will ensure that new developments use space more efficiently. More compact development will result in an improved urban form that is more walkable. Improves healthy active living the proposed TDM strategy will promote the use of urban design elements in new developments that encourage active transportation (i.e. walking and cycling) by permitting reductions in vehicle parking location and supply. Supports transit use and transit development future developments surrounding the MAX Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) should be constructed with transit-supportive parking rates to maximize the return on investment. The TDM Checklist supports the goal of transit-supportive parking rates in appropriate areas, such as the BRT stations, and TOD Overlay Zone in general as well as the Downtown area and in doing so, supports area transit use. Supports City Plan and Transportation Master Plan objectives the proposed TDM checklist as well as the TOD Overlay Zone parking requirement adjustments will support the City s adopted policies for sustainable planning and development.

Educational Component regardless of whether or not a developer uses/ implements the voluntary Trip Reduction Incentives included in the TDM Checklist, their introduction to the development review process has an important educational component about the TDM options that are available. Challenges of the TDM Checklist Perceived economic development impacts transit-supportive parking rates effectively reduce peak period traffic and encourage compact land development. However, business owners often perceive abundant parking supply as an important factor in attracting business. As such, there is resistance to limiting the amount of parking provided by the development industry even if much of the surplus parking goes unused. Increased demand for staff resources the implementation of any TDM parking or trip reduction policies will create additional demand for municipal staff time and resources. However, the impact of new policies is reduced when they are implemented through a TIS process as much of the analysis is essentially outsourced. The TIS process is typically limited to developments with a substantial impact on the transportation system, which effectively reduces the number of proposals immediately affected. It will also provide the Region and the Area Municipalities an opportunity to refine the process as it is expanded over time. Challenges enforcing and implementing trip reduction incentives new building owners and the changing needs of tenants makes transferring and implementing TDM strategies at specific locations challenging. Enforcing TDM strategies through the planning process provides some level of control compared to entirely voluntary programs. Linking this process with a well-developed TDM program will improve the process by providing additional resources and assistance. The recommended TDM program will also make it easier to implement TDM programming, provide new program offerings over time and be a resource during ownership changes to transfer TDM program benefits to new tenants.

Site Address: Date: Site Context: Parking Requirement: TOD Overlay Zone Applicable Parking Reduction: The Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Checklist and Parking Management Worksheet are not designed for residential properties, but can be used to inform mixed-use developments. TABLE A Site Access In creating an environment that supports pedestrian and cycling activity, the public realm must be accessible, safe, and comfortable to encourage movement on the street and in the surrounding area(s). These facilities and features should encourage walking and cycling. A1 2 A2 1 Development incorporates functional building entrances that are oriented to public space or to locations where pedestrians and transit users arrive from such as a street, square, park or plaza. External to site: Continuous sidewalks are provided along both sides of all adjacent public streets (over and above requirement) Internal to site: Pedestrian walkways (1.5m min width) are provided through large parking areas to link the building with the public street sidewalk system (over and above requirement) A3 3 Non-residential: development provides secure bike storage for 4% of the building occupants. A4 4 Shower and change facilities for employees provided on-site consistent with LEED requirements. A5 2 Provision of active uses at-grade along street frontages. Category Max = 10 Total Points Applicable = 10 Score = TABLE B Public Transportation Access The availability and proximity of convenient public transit service with direct pedestrian linkages to the building will provide viable travel options for employees, visitors and residents. Bus shelters with seating are provided at the transit stop immediately adjacent to the development B1 1 in consultation with Transportation Planning at the Region of Waterloo Information regarding public transit routes, schedules and fares are provided in an accessible and B2 1 visible location on site and in adjacent bus stops B3a 5 Located within 1600 yards of a Rapid Transit Station B3b 3 B3c 1 Located within 1200 yards of a bus service with headways of 15 min or less or is located in a designated mixed use corridor or node. Note: Points are awarded for either B3a, B3b or B3c only. Please choose whichever represents the highest order of transit. Located within 800 yards of a bus service with headways of 16 min to 30 min. Note: Points are awarded for either B3a, B3b or B3c only. Please choose whichever represents the highest order of transit. Category Max = 5 Total Points Applicable = 5 Score = TABLE C Parking Vehicle parking facilities can affect the character, travel mode and cost of a development. Reducing parking supply to match expected demand can a have a positive influence on the selection of alternative travel modes. Utilizes reduced parking supply consistent with the TDM Parking Management Worksheet. Contact City of Fort Collins Planning to determine whether the Worksheet is applicable to your C1 24 development. Note: Points are awarded for either C1, C2, or C3 only. Please choose whichever applies with the highest value. Includes allowances for shared parking in mixed-use zones. Note: Points are awarded for C1, C2, C2 24 or C3 only. Please choose whichever applies after consulting with City of Fort Collins Planning. C3 15 Provides no more than the minimum number of parking spaces, as required by applicable Zoning By-Law. Note: Points are awarded for either C1, C2, or C3 only. Please choose whichever applies. Implements paid parking on part or all of the site (e.g. parking permits, paid parking zones near C4 10 main entrances) Provides priority parking for carpooling/vanpooling participants equivalent to 5% of employee C5 3 spaces Commercial Uses: Provide car-share spaces equivalent to 2% of building occupants C6 5 C7 3 C8 5 Parking is not located on major street frontage or between a road right of way and the building facade. 25% to 50% of parking is located underground or in a structure

C9 10 C10 15 C11 3 50% to 75% of parking is located underground or in a structure 75% of parking or more is located underground or in a structure Parking spaces provided off-site on a lot within 600 yards of the lot containing such use. Category Max = 25 Total Points Applicable = 25 Score = TABLE D Trip Reduction Incentives A formal TDM plan will identify specific initiatives that will be initiated in order to encourage reduced single occupant vehicle travel. D1 2 The building owner/occupant will provide a ride matching service for car/vanpooling D2 2 The building owner/occupant will provide emergency ride home options D3 5 The building owner/occupant will provide subsidized transit passes for all occupants for a period of two years D4 5 The building owner/occupant agrees to charge for parking as an unbundled cost to occupants D5 2 D6 10 The building owner/occupant agrees to provide reduced cost for users of car/van pool, bicycle, moped/motorcycle spaces The building owner/occupant has prepared a TDM plan to the satisfaction of the Region of Waterloo and the Area Municipality that targets a 10% reduction in peak hour trips using forecast trip generation with status quo travel characteristics D7 5 The employer has provided flexible working hours, telework or shift work arrangements. D8 14 D9 2 The development agrees to join (TMA) that provides the same services outlined under items D1, D2, D6 The development includes mixed uses (i.e. retail, commercial or food services, daycares, or other complementary uses) on-site or located within 800 yards. Category Max = 25 Total Points Applicable = 25 Score = TABLE E Checklist Summary For each item, a Yes answer is equivalent to the points as indicated in the section. N/A sections should be explained in an attachment to this table. The score for each section is reflected as a percentage and calculated by dividing the points by the Total Applicable. Category Minimum Requirement Pedestrian & Cyclist Orientation 24 Public Transit Access Total Applicable 10 Parking 25 SUB-TOTAL 40 Trip Reduction Incentives 25 OVERALL TOTAL 65 65 TABLE F Scoring Summary FINAL SCORE 50-65 **** 40-49 *** 30-39 ** 24-29 * 5 Points Scored RATING Comments TDM-SUPPORTIVE DEVELOPMENT 0-23 X Non-TDM-Supportive Development

Parking Management Worksheet Site Address: Date: Site Context: Worksheet No.: "Downtown Parking District - (DPD) area classification includes downtown Fort Collins. "TOD Overlay Zone" (TOD) classification is applied to sites within the define TOD Overlay Zone within the City of Fort Collins "Other" classification applies to all other sites Please highlight the cell percentages applicable to your development under the appropriate classification. Please note that the Parking Management Worksheet and the Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Checklist are not designed for residential properties, but can be used for mixeduse developments. Local municipalities are the decision-making bodies with respect to consideration of parking reductions below Zoning By-law requirements. TABLE A Pedestrian and Cyclist Orientation In creating an environment that supports pedestrian and cycling activity, the public realm must be accessible, safe, and comfortable to encourage movement on the street and in the surrounding area(s). These facilities and features should encourage walking and cycling. A1 A2 A3 A4 Development incorporates functional building entrances that are oriented to public space or to locations where pedestrians and transit users arrive from such as a street, square, park or plaza. Continuous sidewalks (1.5m min. width) are provided along both sides of all adjacent public streets and pedestrian walkways (1.5m min width) are provided through large parking areas to link the building with the public street sidewalk system 1% 1% 1% Non-Residential: Development provides secure bike storage for 4% of the building occupants 2% 2% 1% Shower and change facilities for employees provided on-site consistent with LEED requirements. 1% 1% 1% A5 Provision of active uses at-grade along street frontages. 1% 1% 1% Category Maximum 4% 4% 4% TABLE B Public Transportation Access The availability and proximity of convenient public transit service with direct pedestrian linkages to the building will provide viable travel options for employees, visitors and residents. B1 B2 Bus shelters with seating are provided at the transit stop immediately adjacent to the development, in consultation with Grand River Transit / transit provider Information regarding public transit routes, schedules and fares are provided in an accessible and visible location on site and in adjacent bus stops B3a Located in an UGC or within 1600 yards of a future Rapid Transit Station 24% 12% 0% B3b Located within 1200 yards a transit route with 15 minute headways (or less) or is located in a designated mixed use corridor or node. Note: Points are awarded for either B3a, B3b or B3c only. Please choose whichever represents the highest order of transit. - 5% 3%

B3c Located within 800 yards of a bus service with headways of 15 min to 30 min. Note: Points are awarded for either B3a, B3b or B3c only. Please choose whichever represents the highest order of transit. - - 1% Category Maximum 24% 12% 5% TABLE C Parking Vehicle parking facilities can affect the character, travel mode and cost of a development. Reducing parking supply to match expected demand can have a positive influence on the selection of alternative travel modes. Provides priority parking for carpooling/vanpooling participants equivalent C1 TABLE D to 5% of employee spaces 0% 0% 5% Commercial Uses: Provide car-share spaces equivalent to 2% of building C2 occupants 2% 2% 0% Implements paid parking system on all or part of the site (e.g. parking C3 permits, paid parking zones near main entrances) 2% 2% 1% C4 Parking is not located on major street frontage. C5 25% to 50% of parking is located underground or in a structure 2% 1% 0% C6 50% to 75% of parking is located underground or in a structure 4% 2% 0% C7 75% of parking or more is located underground or in a structure 5% 3% 0% Category Maximum 6% 4% 6% Trip Reduction Incentives A formal TDM plan will identify specific initiatives that will be initiated in order to encourage reduced single occupant vehicle travel. The building owner/occupant will provide a ride matching service for D1 car/vanpooling D2 The building owner/occupant will provide emergency ride home options 3% 2% 1% D3 D4 D5 D6 TABLE E The building owner/occupant will provide subsidized transit passes for all occupants for a period of two years 10% 4% 2% The building owner/occupant agrees to charge for parking as an separate cost to occupants 10% 5% 2% The building owner/occupant agrees to provide reduced cost for users of car/van pool, bicycle, moped/motorcycle spaces The development agrees to join (TMA) that provides the same services outlined under items D1 and D2 9% 6% 4% Category Maximum 23% 11% 7% Parking Reduction Summary Please indicate the total reduction available based upon Tables A through D above. Category Reduction Achieved Maximum Achievable Reduction UGC IC Other Pedestrian & Cyclist Orientation 0% 4% 4% 4% Public Transit Access 0% 24% 12% 5% Parking 0% 6% 4% 6% Trip Reduction Incentives 0% 23% 11% 7% TOTAL 0% 57% 31% 22% Comments TABLE F TOTAL REDUCTION ACHIEVED 0%