We are failing our athletes when we are unable to find commercial sponsorship.

Similar documents
Paralympic Working Group Update

A few good women (and a large crowd of men) Results from the SMS research project

Alignment and Integration: CS4L and the NCCP


Attachments for Step 2 Title: List of Olympic Sports Description: This is a list of Olympic sports featured in Summer Games and in Winter Games.

4.7 Leave for Sporting Fixtures

These cross-curriculum activities contribute to the achievement of the following:

Minimum Levels of Analysis for Sports and Disciplines of Olympic, IOC Recognized and Non- IOC Recognized International Federations 4

Sports and Disciplines of Olympic, IOC Recognized and Non-IOC Recognized International Federations 1 and Minimum Levels of Analysis

Sports and Disciplines of Olympic, IOC Recognized and Non-IOC Recognized International Federations 1 and Minimum Levels of Analysis

CCES Quarterly Statistics

SPORT DISCIPLINE % GH%

Participation: Once a week for 30 minutes at moderate intensity

Equity in Athletics 2009

Houston Baptist University EADA Report 1

Equity in Athletics Screening Questions

OLYMPIC CHANNEL WHERE THE GAMES NEVER END

Equity in Athletics 2014 Institution: Universidad Politecnica de Puerto Rico (243577) User ID: E Screening Questions

Satisfaction with the quality of the sporting experience survey (SQSE 4) Drop out survey report. October 2012

Equity in Athletics Screening Questions

Equity in Athletics 2013

Equity in Athletics 2016 Institution: Universidad Politecnica de Puerto Rico (243577) User ID: E Screening Questions

Equity in Athletics 2016 Institution: Universidad del Sagrado Corazon (243443) User ID: E Screening Questions

Equity in Athletics Screening Questions

Equity in Athletics 2017 Institution: Texas Christian University (228875) User ID: E Screening Questions

Once a week participation in individual (funded) sports

The global sporting arms race

Equity in Athletics 2018 Institution: Universidad Politecnica de Puerto Rico (243577) User ID: E Screening Questions

Equity in Athletics Screening Questions

Equity in Athletics 2018 Institution: Skagit Valley College (236638) User ID: E Screening Questions

Categories of sports

Equity in Athletics 2017 Institution: Arkansas State University-Main Campus (106458) User ID: E Screening Questions

Screening Questions 3. Select Sports teams at your institution (must select at least one) Sport Type Men Women Sports Type Men Women

Equity in Athletics 2018 Institution: Mercyhurst University (213987) User ID: E Screening Questions

Equity in Athletics 2017 Institution: Illinois Valley Community College (145831) User ID: E Screening Questions

Equity in Athletics 2015 Institution: University of Nevada-Las Vegas (182281) User ID: E Screening Questions

Equity in Athletics 2014 Institution: Sacramento City College (122180) User ID: E Screening Questions

** All previous recipients must be completely up to date with any Final Reports owed to viasport. Page 1 of 10

Equity in Athletics 2017 Institution: Northwest Kansas Technical College (155618) User ID: E Screening Questions

Equity in Athletics 2018 Institution: Silver Lake College of the Holy Family (239743) User ID: E Screening Questions

Equity in Athletics Screening Questions

Equity in Athletics 2016 Institution: Elgin Community College (144944) User ID: E Screening Questions

Equity in Athletics Screening Questions

Equity in Athletics 2017 Institution: Texas A & M International University (226152) User ID: E Screening Questions

Equity in Athletics 2016 Institution: Allegany College of Maryland (161688) User ID: E Screening Questions

Equity in Athletics Screening Questions

YouGov Survey Results

Equity in Athletics 2018 Institution: University of Maine at Machias (161244) User ID: E Screening Questions

Equity in Athletics 2018 Institution: Vermont Technical College (231165) User ID: E Screening Questions

Equity in Athletics 2018 Institution: Grambling State University (159009) User ID: E Screening Questions

Equity in Athletics 2017 Institution: Southwestern Illinois College (143215) User ID: E Screening Questions

Equity in Athletics 2015 Institution: Jackson State Community College (220400) User ID: E Screening Questions

Equity in Athletics 2017 Institution: Chattanooga State Community College (219824) User ID: E Screening Questions

Equity in Athletics Screening Questions

Equity in Athletics 2016 Institution: Southern University at Shreveport (160649) User ID: E Screening Questions

Equity in Athletics Screening Questions

Equity in Athletics 2018 Institution: Passaic County Community College (186034) User ID: E Screening Questions

Equity in Athletics 2015 Institution: El Camino College-Compton Center (112686) User ID: E Screening Questions

Equity in Athletics 2018 Institution: St Charles Community College (262031) User ID: E Screening Questions

Equity in Athletics 2018 Institution: Frederick Community College (162557) User ID: E Screening Questions

Equity in Athletics 2017 Institution: Fayetteville State University (198543) User ID: E Screening Questions

Equity in Athletics 2018 Institution: Northwest Kansas Technical College (155618) User ID: E Screening Questions

Equity in Athletics 2018 Institution: CUNY Queensborough Community College (190673) User ID: E Screening Questions

Equity in Athletics Screening Questions

ASPC EUROPEAN FORUM 2012 SEPT. 19 TH TO 20 TH LUXEMBOURG

Equity in Athletics 2017 Institution: Trinity College of Florida (137962) User ID: E Screening Questions

Equity in Athletics 2017 Institution: Marshalltown Community College (153922) User ID: E Screening Questions

Equity in Athletics 2017 Institution: Arkansas Tech University (106467) User ID: E Screening Questions

Equity in Athletics Screening Questions

Equity in Athletics 2016 Institution: Southern Nazarene University (206862) User ID: E Screening Questions

Equity in Athletics 2014 Institution: Vincennes University (152637) User ID: E Screening Questions

Equity in Athletics 2016 Institution: Waubonsee Community College (149727) User ID: E Screening Questions


Equity in Athletics Screening Questions

Equity in Athletics Screening Questions

Equity in Athletics 2017 Institution: Erie Community College (191083) User ID: E Screening Questions

Equity in Athletics 2018 Institution: Allegany College of Maryland (161688) User ID: E Screening Questions

Equity in Athletics 2017 Institution: Washburn University (156082) User ID: E Screening Questions

Equity in Athletics 2018 Institution: Clark State Community College (201973) User ID: E Screening Questions

Equity in Athletics 2017 Institution: Arizona Western College (104160) User ID: E Screening Questions

Equity in Athletics 2018 Institution: Spoon River College (148991) User ID: E Screening Questions

Equity in Athletics 2016 Institution: Northeastern State University (207263) User ID: E Screening Questions

Equity in Athletics 2017 Institution: Garden City Community College (155104) User ID: E Screening Questions

Equity in Athletics 2018 Institution: Arizona Western College (104160) User ID: E Screening Questions

TORONTO 2015 PAN AM GAMES. TICKETING PROGRAM At a Glance

EQUITY IN ATHLETICS DISCLOSURE ACT REPORT (EADA) October 10, 2017

Equity in Athletics 2015 Institution: Roberts Wesleyan College (194958) User ID: E Screening Questions

Equity in Athletics 2016 Institution: Roberts Wesleyan College (194958) User ID: E Screening Questions

Equity in Athletics Screening Questions

Equity in Athletics Screening Questions

Equity in Athletics 2017 Institution: Oglala Lakota College (219277) User ID: E Screening Questions

Equity in Athletics 2018 Institution: Roberts Wesleyan College (194958) User ID: E Screening Questions

Equity in Athletics Screening Questions

Fixing the Broken Middle Together. Petro-Canada Sport Leadership 2007

Equity in Athletics Screening Questions

Equity in Athletics 2017 Institution: Howard Community College (162779) User ID: E Screening Questions

Equity in Athletics 2015 Institution: Blue Mountain Community College (208275) User ID: E Screening Questions

Equity in Athletics Screening Questions

Equity in Athletics 2017 Institution: Hannibal-LaGrange University (177542) User ID: E Screening Questions

Equity in Athletics 2018 Institution: Jackson State Community College (220400) User ID: E Screening Questions

Transcription:

Date: July 20, 2018 To: USS Board members From: Bruce Burton, President Subject: July 2018 President s Report Dear USS Board members, This is an uncharacteristically busy time for your president. As reported last month, the staff and organization are in full swing as our summer months are at peak season. During this period the Board activity slows down as we allow the staff time to complete their projects and attend regattas. We go sailing, they keep to the grindstone. In my case, I am in the same boat as the staff! This is what has kept me on the go since our last meeting: Over the Transom US Sailing Foundation For the past two months I spoke of our need for nominations for directors and trustees for the Foundation. This is my second round of reminders to you to please contact Georgia McDonald, Jack Gierhart or me if you have a nomination for director or trustee. Thank you! World Cup Miami As reported by Jack Gierhart and me, separately, we will exceed the budgeted loss approved by the US Sailing Board unless World Sailing provides requirement relief specified in the contract. As a result, the Olympic Sailing Committee (OSC) recommended/supported Jack s firm response to World Sailing when they told us they would not provide requirement relief. Jack wrote a letter and spoke to the World Sailing CEO, I wrote the WS president and many of us spoke to WS board members. The net effect of these appeals has been that it now appears that we will receive the requirement relief we requested. Many thanks to Jack, Cory Sertl, Meredith Brody, Malcom Page, Gary Bodie, John Craig, Gary Jobson and many other for their indefatigable efforts to resolve this, allowing us to remain a World Cup series country for 2019. There is no guarantee that we will have a World Cup regatta in 2020 because our contract expires and WS has not protected the calendar to ensure that all classes can attend the regatta. Jack will provide the details of the negotiation if necessary, along with the requirements relief received. Chief Marketing Officer Peter Glass and I were able to meet in Bristol July 16 th, his first day on the job. I met him by phone before his official start date so it was nice to place the face with the voice. My emphasis for him was to use his talents to help us grow our revenue and membership. Peter comes from Ski and Snowboarding, so he knows marketing and growing a business that has both a membership and Olympic component. He understands that marketing must lead to growth and improved customer satisfaction/awareness, so we are off to an aligned start on my expectations. One of Peter s first initiatives is to improve the commercial sponsorship program for the Sailing Team. We are frustrated by our lack of progress in securing sponsors and Peter will be personally involved in sponsorship meetings with our contractor, Degan Media, to close contracts. Degan, who you met via phone last month, has made a significant number of contacts, all of which have not led to revenue. Peter intends to resolve these contacts, one way or the other. We are failing our athletes when we are unable to find commercial sponsorship.

July 2018 President s Report Page 2 Olympic Sailing Committee (OSC) Staffing You will receive a verbal report in Executive Session on the progress we are making to replace Jim Campbell. Fundraising As reported last month we are closing in our Aarhus campaign $2.5M goal. An important element of the plan is the one design challenge which has been very successful. This is the first time that we have engaged one design sailors on a large scale and asked for their support. These are the key activities that we are pursuing to achieve that goal: Week of 7/9 Aarhus Digital Newsletter Update from Malcolm Athlete & Coach Interview Meredith/logistics Story Update on Funds received and what they purchased Week of 7/16 Focused Last Ask Email Message from new Donors (3 Medalist, Mid Level, Small) Why they re supporting the team Message from a Coach the impact they ve witnessed, what more funding would do Call to Action let s show our Team we re behind them Week of 7/23 Thank You Impact Beyond Aarhus Thank you video(s) to Medalist donors (individualized) Thank you videos to the One Design Classes (individualized) Your impact reaches beyond Aarhus your support takes our Team Tokyo The one design component of the campaign has provided this level of funding:

July 2018 President s Report Page 3 Summarized, it is: Our goal is $300,000. Cash In $121,580.00 Pledge Balances $179,000.00 Total Raised $300,580.00 Promises Outstanding $56,000.00 Projected Total Raised $356,580.00 NGB Board Chairman Summit USA Triathlon organized a first ever summit meeting of all Olympic sport NGB chairmen, held in Denver on July 17 and 18. I attended with about half of the other NGBs. I was so impressed with these leaders and what their sports are doing. Of course, I wanted to know how US Sailing stacks up against the rest of them. There are many opportunities to share best practices. For example, US Equestrian significantly grew their membership in a few years. I hope to learn more on how they did that now that we have a connection to their leadership. This was one of the best events that I have attended since being on our Board and I highly encourage us to continue to participate. These are some of the notes I took during the meeting: 1. The USOC has a crisis about every 10 years: Salt Lake bribery/tickets, Doping, now sexual abuse. 2. All NGBs are short of money regardless of Tier (see attached for tier breakdown). 3. The NGB Board should have a director with a legal background. 4. The USOC relies on the NGB for athlete pipeline development: our ODP is so important for that. 5. 12% of USOC budget is for fundraising. 6% is for salaries of management. 6. We, USST, should make sure that our athletes know all the services the USOC has available to them. 7. SafeSport a. All the NGBs want SafeSport to be implemented the same give us the cookbook on how to do it. b. Gymnastics now requires all parents to take Safe Sport Training to register their athlete. c. NGBs want clubs to be certified as safe meaning that they have been certified as passing a training program as a club. d. 400,000 people have taken the online training. e. USOC contributes 2X of what NGBs contribute to SS. f. $2.5M from Department of Justice to support SafeSport. g. 1,500 cases in front of SS now. h. The average case comes to closure in 79 days. 8. Board Policies a. USA Water Polo requires each director to donate $25,000 annually to be on the Board. b. Most Boards meet face to face twice a year. c. Very few Boards have monthly calls. d. Chair terms:

July 2018 President s Report Page 4 i. Most Board chairs have two or four year terms. ii. Only one other had a three year term. e. Director Terms i. 2 to 4 years ii. Many without term limits iii. Hockey has 90+ on Board iv. Most directors are now independent, not affiliated with an athlete, sponsor or have another title within the organization. 9. Some sports biggest selling points=reason for membership=insurance and athlete safety 10. It is very hard to get athlete reps on the Board (we know that from the OSC). 11. 50 is the total number of NGBs. 12. USOC has a standard customer survey, something like we do with the net promotor score. 13. Think no margin, no mission when thinking about services offered. Use our Filter! 14. Crisis planning is important be prepared beforehand. I left the summit feeling that we are well above the median in governance and process control. That is balanced against what I believe is a pretty big shortfall in potential revenue generation and membership. I believe that Jack and the staff have good plans to close those gaps and our strategic plan will go a long way to help lead us there. Over the Bow Things that I will focus on this month: 1. Staff meetings while east. 2. Support revenue generation planning and execution. Support hiring Jim Campbell replacement. 3. Transition of leadership to Cory Sertl over the next three months. Thank you for your continued support, Bruce J. Burton, President

2 Revenue segments help identify NGBs will similar operational priorities Primary Revenue Source Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Segment Description Membership US Equestrian Federation US Figure Skating USA Gymnastics USA Hockey USA Swimming USA Cycling USA Rugby USA Triathlon USA Water Polo USA Wrestling USA Boxing USA Judo USA Taekwondo USA Badminton American Canoe USA Climbing USA Synchronized Swimming USA Table Tennis Many NGBs focus on growing the sport to drive membership. Generally Tier 1 and 2 NGBs attract members through a unique value proposition while Tier 3 and 4 gain members because membership is necessary to compete Events US Tennis USA Volleyball USA Fencing USA Field Hockey USA Pentathlon NGBs face little competition in the events space from other organizations USOC Funding Sponsorship/ Licensing Grants/ Donations/ Fundraising USA Golf USA Track & Field US Ski and Snowboard USA Bobsled & Skeleton Federation USA Curling USA Diving USA Luge US Speedskating US Biathlon Half of these NGBs are categorized in the USOC s Gold or Silver HP tier; all of these NGBs have smaller staff and revenue and rely on this funding to operate and develop programs USA Basketball NGBs capitalize on their strong brand presence to secure sponsorship and licensing deals US Sailing USA Shooting USA Archery USA Team Handball NGBs generate revenue from specific parties who are devoted to the sport Certification/ Education USA Weightlifting NGB differentiates by selling educational products in the marketplace, expanding offerings beyond members Copyright 2018 Deloitte Development LLC. All rights reserved. 22 *Did not interview US Soccer Federation, US Rowing, or USA Surfing so do not have information on largest revenue driver