Slide. Too close together; Don't like the garages in front; Front-facing garages are not nice; Bland; Looks like suburbs; Only see garages

Similar documents
Illustrated Principles of Good Planning

State Street Workshop Summary September 26, 2012 SITE A. - INTERSECTION OF STATE AND HOLLY TOTAL ATTENDEES = ~29

Appendix B Results of Visual Preference Survey March 2017

Guthriesville Village Manual of Written & Graphic Design Guidelines

Table #6 VISION CHARACTERISTICS

Healthy Corridors. Ed McMahon Urban Land Institute Nashville, TN

Perryville Transit Oriented Development & Greenway Plan

MEDIAN DESIGN example median A

Clarkson Walkability Audit: Results and Recommendations Summary

Community Meeting February 27, 2007 Dorchester Avenue Transportation & Streetscape Improvements Action Plan February 27, 2007

City of Walnut Creek TELEGRAPH AVENUE BART LINE SELF-GUIDED TOD TOUR 19TH STREET BART STATION

Learning Places Spring 2017 SITE REPORT Vinegar Hill, Brooklyn

State Street Corridor Plan Project Management Team

Property Owner Survey Results

AND GUIDING PRINCIPLES. Boise, Idaho 1997

7/23/2017 VIA . Michael Hanebutt City of Sacramento Community Development Department 300 Richards Boulevard, 3 rd Floor Sacramento, CA 95811

STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING June 17, Streetscape Overview Burlington Comprehensive Master Plan

Walkability Audit Scores and Comments Lacey, Tumwater, and Olympia, WA September 2012

Cottage Grove Road Activity Centers Plan

Public Workshop #2. September 14, 2016

Microscale Audit of Pedestrian Streetscapes (MAPS), Mini Version

RENEW OPELIKA ROAD CORRIDOR PLAN RENEW OPELIKA ROAD CORRIDOR PLAN

A CHANGING CITY. of Edmonton, it is essential that it reflects the long-term vision of the City.

FONTAINE AVENUE STUDY Final Report

STONY PLAIN ROAD STREETSCAPE

THE ALAMEDA CONCEPT DESIGN COMMUNITY MEETING 3. A Plan for The Beautiful Way JANUARY 28, 2010

6. Traditional Neighborhood Design. Fact Sheet

City of Darlington Beautification Report

City of Orlando Virginia/ Lake Highland Transportation and Land Use Study

To: Planning Commission Date: September 19, 2012 From: By: Subject:

1.3 Pedestrian Environments

Traffic s Human Toll How Cars and Trucks Affect New Yorkers Quality of Life

INSTANT IMPACT GUIDE TEMPORARY, COST-EFFECTIVE IDEAS FOR MORE VIBRANT STREETS

McLean Main Street Public Forum Follow-up

Elm Street Business District: Streetscape and Signage Plan

DOWNTOWN TENINO. Goal: Get more People in Downtown. A Pamphlet of Concepts for

The following is submitted together with the plans and application for the staff and plan commission consideration of approval.

5/31/2016 VIA . Arwen Wacht City of Sacramento Community Development Department 300 Richards Blvd., 3 rd Floor Sacramento, CA 95811

Creating walkable, bikeable and transit-supportive communities in Halton

Ann Arbor Downtown Street Plan

S T A T I O N A R E A P L A N

University of Michigan & Urban Land Institute Real Estate Forum. Mary Beth Graebert Michigan State University

David Hung, Associate Planner City of Sacramento Community Development Department 300 Richards Boulevard, 3 rd Floor Sacramento, CA

Obey Creek PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION EAST WEST PARTNERS PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION CREEK SIDE LANE SLIP STREET SCOTT MURRAY MAIN STREETS EAST/WEST

York Boulevard Streetscape Master Plan

DATE: June 22, General Release SUBMITTED BY: LAND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES. RE: City Centre Survey Results

12/4/2016 VIA . RE: Grocery Outlet Del Paso (DR16-328)

ROUTE 81 CORRIDOR STUDY DESIGN CONCEPTS

Pedestrian Survey Report

Approaches. Livable Neighborhood Design. Examples. Traditional neighborhood development. CE 594 University of Wisconsin- Milwaukee

STREETSCAPE CONCEPTS

Appendix B - Street Sections

Berkeley SOSIP. My Focus

PIONEER SQUARE ACTIVE STREETS

MAKE YOUR PLACE IN CHANNELSIDE

First Impressions Visit to Salem, Ohio

Comments The Plan for Port Whitby

What are the greatest challenges for the Route 9 Corridor? Number of responses received by category

Please leave more comments below! (Or refer to numbered comments on your own comment sheet/form if you need more space)

Charrette #1 Keypad Polling Results. June 27, 2012

MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. WAY

Community Workshop #1 Summary October 2017

Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC) November 21, 2013

TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES AND THEIR IMPACT ON HEALTH

WORKSHOP 2 SUMMARY OVERVIEW GENERAL COMMENTS. Walking and Biking. Greening & Stormwater. Transportation & Parking. Lighting, Art and Identity

Streetscape: Core Shopping District

12/13/2018 VIA

South Terrace Pedestrian Safety and Streetscape Improvement: Community Engagement Summary

Rock Spring Kick-Off Meeting 09/01/15 Walter Johnson High School Break Out Table Summaries. Rock Spring Break Out Table Comments. Table 1: Strengths:

City of Wausau Wausau Center Urban Design and Transportation Master Plan. Design Workshop // October 18, 2018

General Plan Community Meeting Summary Ward 3 Santiago Elementary School 2212 North Baker Street Thursday, March 31, :00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m.

RIVERSIDE, Newton MA BH NORMANDY RIVERSIDE LLC. Riverside Station. A green, transit-oriented community

East Pasadena Specific Plan Area Community Walking Tour

Northside Livable Centers Study

Thesis Presentation. Moorhead City Walk: A Master Plan to Reimage Moorhead, Minnesota s Urban Core. Brad Garcia Advisors: Jason Kost & Dominic Fischer

Sidewalk Cafe City of St. Petersburg City Code Chapter 16, Land Development Regulations

WHITE STREET/ ENGLISH PLAZA STREETSCAPE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT

Cluster 5/Module 2 (C5/M2): Pedestrians and Transit Oriented Development (TOD)

Southside Pilot Proposal

San Francisco Asian, Inc.

Stakeholder Meeting Handouts. January 2013

COBB COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AGENCY

Appendix 3 SACRAMENTO COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

COWETA HIGH SCHOOL AND EAST HIGHWAY 51

Smart Growth: Residents Social and Psychological Benefits, Costs and Design Barbara Brown

5 CIRCULATION AND STREET DESIGN

Complete Streets Successes, Opportunities, and Challenges

Implementing Complete Streets: The Road Diet. Ed McKinney, AICP Senior Associate, Glatting Jackson

The Impact of Placemaking Attributes on Home Prices in the Midwest United States

Arapahoe Square Zoning + Design Standards & Guidelines Task Force Meeting 9 January 27, 2016

Exit 13/Golden Triangle Study

This chapter describes the proposed circulation system and transportation alternatives associated with

A Plan for The Beautiful Way NOVEMBER 16, 2009

Southview Blvd & 3 rd Avenue Improvement Project. Public Open House December 4, to 7pm

Comments on KXLY DRB Submittal from Southgate Neighborhood Council

Sistrunk Corridor DOTMOCRACY SUMMARY

Shared Court Housing Concept Summary

UDC Street Cross Sections

Excelsior Outer Mission Neighborhood Strategy Youth Focused Conversation Notes July 18th, :30pm to 2:00pm Excelsior Works!

Executive Summary Route 30 Corridor Master Plan

Transcription:

1 Slide Visual Preference Survey Results Like driveways and less density; Everything looks squeezed in; Street parking is a turn-off; East Coast look; I like the porches; Garages should be in alleys; Too common; No front yard; Too close 32 22 16 together 31 15 24 Too close together; Don't like the garages in front; Front-facing garages are not nice; land; Looks like suburbs; Only see garages 2 40 17 13 land; Classic look; Too close to street; Too monolithic 44 6 20 Really cute; Very charming; Inviting; Love this idea for Original urora; Too busy; Like this concept 3 32 16 22 If it's an office, I like it; Like the modern look; I like it, just not next door 20 24 26 Too boring; Plain and generic; No landscaping; Doesn't incorporate the corner; Looks old and common; No trees; Too cold; Ugly shape 4 5 56 6 8 4 8 58 19 19 32 Like the green; Spacious and green; Like the grass and green area; Grass is pretty; Love the courtyard; Like the green space; Like the green Looks like 1950's; Looks like a motel; Institutional; Looks like an old, cheap hotel; Looks affordable; No landscaping; Run down; Dull; land; Institutional Too cookie cutter; Garages are ugly; Hate focus on garages; Front door should be before garage; Neutral about duplexes; Too similar; Don't like garage setup; Too much garage 44 12 14 Looks better than the other because you can't see the garages; Pretty; Doesn't have enough color; Similar to where we live 6 23 24 23 41 18 11 Too close together; Too suburban; No garages allowed in front of duplexes; Not green enough; Not enough space Like all the windows; Maybe too contemporary; eautiful; Like that the garage doors are in the back; Windows give it better style; Like no garage in front 7 47 10 13 11 15 44 Reminds me of old brownstones; Good massing; ppropriately urban; Love the streetscape; Like the architecture; Not us; Nice trees Too much like slums; Visually boring; Industrial looking; Plain; Looks old and needs to be updated; No landscaping; Nowhere to park; No trees; No greenery; Simple

8 19 25 26 39 18 13 Like the ground floor retail; Good architecture; Like the nostalgia; Really dislike Looks historical; Like the brick; rick is nice; Okay but needs modern updates; Looks renovated and classic; Need more brick on buildings; Like the traditional look 9 45 16 9 1 17 52 Open, green and park-like; Like the green space; Love the courtyard; No one uses these parks; I like green; Greenbelt; Like the green spaces Need green space; No green space; Looks like a motel; Too much concrete; No green space; No green; Old and tired; Run down; No color; Cheap motel look 10 46 15 9 DU's would be great; Very cute; Looks better than a regular garage; Cool way to make garages look nice; Small area 11 12 9 19 Too much driveway; Concrete in bad shape; 42 Invite graffiti; Run down; Like garage space; Ugly Like the mixed-use; Great for retail; Too commercial; Pedestrian oriented; Good opportunity for small businesses; Vibrant mixeduse; Nice corner element; Classic fits better; Like 36 18 16 the mixed-use 22 20 28 50 9 11 Convenience; Too focused on cars; Too commercial; Too vehicular-oriented; Don't like big box stores; Too common; Not us; Too much commercial; arren DU's would be great; I like tiny houses; Well built; No landscaping; There are lots of these in large cities, good use; Like tiny houses; Ugly design 35 25 10 ttractive 13 65 3 2 5 22 43 Trees make it look nice; Like the trees; Like the streetscape; Good landscaping; Trees help; Friendly Too suburban; Needs trees; No trees; Gross; Plain; Needs trees; No bike lanes or sidewalks; Needs more landscaping; Not enough trees; Needs trees 14 9 24 37 Ugly drive-thru; Tacky; Need more food in the neighborhood; wful 34 26 10 Love the patio and plants; Like the outdoor seating; Great patio and outdoor space; Nice restaurant; Outdoor space is great

15 33 13 24 Neat architecture; Looks dangerous; Great for small lots; Weird; Traditional; Colorado style is wood; Ugly; Too narrow 20 11 39 Looks like a broken Lego; Neat architecture; Modern; Great for small lots; Weird; Like the modern feel; Ugly; Too modern; Narrow 16 11 25 34 Looks run down 43 14 13 Love the DU; Good use of garage 17 26 22 22 28 18 24 Like the mixed-use; Dense but good; Have local businesses as much as possible; Retail is nice; Modern looking Like the urban feel; Dense but good; Too much like New York City; No streetscape; uilding is nice but no Wal-Mart; No landscaping; Would like a grocery store like this; lready have a Wal-Mart 18 18 29 23 52 9 9 Needs more landscaping; oring; Looks affordable; No walkways; No emphasis on communal space; Looks old; Disconnected More community friendly; Community; Visually interesting; Interconnected paths; Good open space; Too busy; Community feel; Don't want to face all my neighbors 19 20 40 19 11 48 15 7 18 25 27 Looks crowded; Vibrant; Like that people are walking; Wider sidewalks and seating are nice; Looks inviting Vibrant; Like how you can use the sidewalks in different ways; Like that people are walking; Good outdoor seating; Like that there are no cars; Inviting ig height difference; Too tall; Inappropriate scale; Parallel parking; Parking like this is good like in Old Town Fort Collins; Like the uniform design; Small building next to large building 26 22 22 Good scale; Looks old, needs to be updated; Too different; No taste; Too many colors; Funky 21 23 25 22 Fire hazard 45 19 6 Like but too similar to each other; Minimize vehicular traffic coming over pedestrians; Like the spacing of the buildings

22 6 25 39 32 16 22 Generic; Don't like apartments with no retail; Not appealing; Looks like a school; Ugly Need private balconies; Generic; Love balconies; alconies save it; alconies are nice; Don't like apartments with no retail; alconies help; alconies are nice; Ugly 23 9 21 40 48 16 6 oring; Crap; Ugly but useful; Strip shops; No outdoor patio area; Ugly Too hipster; eautiful; Looks amazing; More identity and pedestrian oriented; Vibrant; Good outdoor seating; Great outdoor space; Outdoor seating makes connections; Landscaping is nice 24 3 26 41 Ugly Vibrant; eautiful corner; Love the trees; Like the retail on the ground floor; Looks great; Inviting storefront and has parking; Great use of corner; Windows make it connect; Inviting; Like the 54 9 7 trees; Mixed-use 25 21 27 22 Not welcoming; Old 26 28 16 Like the house conversion to retail; Nice outdoor space; Too busy upfront; Unique but stylish; Good concept but looks cluttered 26 27 28 5 22 43 Concrete jungle; We do love our cars still; Too much parking and no landscaping; Lots of parking; No landscaped islands 49 17 Trees are good; Like the trees; land; Don't like to have to drive around trees in parking lot; Need more landscaped islands; Trees rock; Like 4 landscaping; Nice parking lot No place to park; Mixed-use is nice; Love mixeduse; eautiful mixed-use with nice benches; Too big; Pedestrian-oriented; Vibrant mixed-use; Want the storefronts on Montview lvd to look 43 12 15 like this 15 22 33 49 21 0 ll concrete; Too vacant; Oriented towards vehicles too much; Office space is nice; Looks like the strip mall on Montview lvd that I don't like; Yesterday's style Need more ranch houses; Great porch; Love the porch; Good architecture, not too modern; Nice porch, makes it feel safe; Well taken care of; Welcoming 62 7 1 Great porch; Love the porch; Good architecture, not too modern; Nice porch, makes it feel safe; Love the windows; Nice house; Good lines

29 5 18 47 This is truly awful; Ugly; Very ugly; Not vibrant; Unnecessary 17 34 19 Nice main floor activity level; Not vibrant; Ugly 30 33 22 15 Pedestrian oriented; Walkways are friendly 5 18 47 Ugly; Doesn't look safe for pedestrians; Signs are useful but ugly; Not pedestrian oriented; Only built for vehicles; Too much signage; Strip malls are so yesterday; Cluttered 31 21 37 12 Love all the glass; Tidy; Looks repurposed; Charming old style 12 37 21 Tidy; Charming old style 32 6 24 40 Old hotel; Old hotels need to go; Flat; Looks low end 39 22 9 Cool lights; Needs landscaping; Like the retail on the ground; Need for-sale units; Lighting rocks; Nice lights 33 37 24 9 Like the residential above the retail; Wide corners are nice; Convenient; ppealing corner 34 37 24 9 36 25 9 Love trees and lights on the street; Must be a walkable neighborhood; Wide corners are nice; Convenient mixed-use but looks old Still like some older buildings; Like mixed-use; Mixed-use is good; Don't like the building but at least it has retail; Definitely nice; Love it, very San Francisco 11 27 32 Generic; land; "Cell block" construction; oring 35 41 20 9 19 37 14 Good variation in materials; Modern feel; Like the retail on the bottom; Don't like curve of façade; Too commercial; ig city feel in a good way uilding is dated; land; Don't like curve of façade; wnings make this better; Too commercial; Too downtown; Too many people for here

36 54 11 5 15 26 29 Looks better than a strip mall; Pedestrian oriented; Good traffic flow No more strip malls; Don't like the strip mall; oring chains; ad colors; Looks phony; Made only for cars; Old style; Too busy; Really dislike; Looks silly; Cold; No unity 37 23 22 25 49 17 4 No malls; Malls are dying; Only okay at Christmas time; Malls are dying off Like outdoor shopping; Love the greenery and bike racks; Outdoor oriented; Outside malls are better; Outdoor shopping is better; Outside rocks; Trees make a big difference 38 39 34 21 15 Good size; Like the design but not the color; No spirit; Very cool 12 15 Don't build high rises; This is ugly; Too tall; Too big; Looks like it should be in Miami; Needs step backs; Too high; No buildings this tall; No high 43 rises; Ugly More of this please; Very nice and decorative; I dig it, embrace the funkiness; Like the art; rt and murals better than empty walls; More local artists needed; This fits us; More murals needed; 37 10 23 Mural is nice but building isn't 3 19 48 oring; Very ugly 40 26 19 25 Cool re-use of old motel; Needs more character; Neat 41 5 23 42 51 15 4 I like the oldness; Restore but don't change; Looks rundown; ffordable; Motels need to go; Needs more character Gather outside, not inside; People oriented; Great for our 300 sunny days; Like being outside; Love the outdoors; Open space; Community feel; People can actually talk to each other 22 29 19 Looks like Central Market; Not us 42 51 13 6 Like the trees; Walkable; Pedestrian friendly; Continuous walkways; ike paths are good 1 14 55 Dangerous; Jaywalking; Unsafe; Not pedestrian friendly; Uninviting

43 19 28 23 Not usable space; Green space; Not an interesting landscape; Very nice 43 23 4 Love the food trucks; Need more food truck areas; Usable civic park; Nice green space; Need a central food truck spot; Great place 44 42 24 4 Interesting architecture; Like the architecture 34 25 11 Visually interesting; Stylish; Nice architecture; Good building design 45 50 13 7 Like the patio seating; Like outdoor seating; Cool outdoor seating; Occupiable sidewalks; Outdoor seating rocks; Outdoor seating is always a plus 21 32 17 Too many cars