Capital Metro Monthly Ridership Report September 2017 (Fiscal Year-end 2017)

Similar documents
Capital Metro Monthly Ridership Report January 2018 (Fiscal Year 2018)

Capital Metro Monthly Ridership Report November 2016 (Fiscal Year 2017)

Capital Metro Monthly Ridership Report December 2016 (Fiscal Year 2017)

Capital Metro Monthly Ridership Report March 2017 (Fiscal Year 2017)

Capital Metro Monthly Ridership Report July 2018 (Fiscal Year 2018)

Capital Metro Monthly Ridership Report March 2018 (Fiscal Year 2018)

Where We Live and Work Today

Ridership in Virginia by System FY2017

2017 LYNX RIDERSHIP YEAR END REVIEW

REVENUE & RIDERSHIP REPORT SEPTEMBER 2018

REVENUE & RIDERSHIP REPORT NOVEMBER 2017

1/30/2019 DRAFT. January 31, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION

Short-Term Transit Ridership and Revenue Forecasting

Transportation-Demand Management Community Presentation

the Story of the 30s & 70s Bus Lines James Hamre - WMATA

Safety and Service Delivery. Committee Information Item III-A. April 12, 2018

Capital and Strategic Planning Committee. Item III - B. April 12, WMATA s Transit-Oriented Development Objectives

Progress Report Capital Programs Support

Community Transit Solutions for the Suburbs APTA Annual Meeting Steve Fittante, New Jersey Transit Corporation September 30, 2013

PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION PLAN FOR THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN

Transit Operations in the I-95 Express Lanes

Purpose and Need. Chapter Introduction. 2.2 Project Purpose and Need Project Purpose Project Need

January 2019 FY Key Performance Report

ORANGE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY. Metrolink Ridership and Revenue Quarterly Report. Staff Report

Hampton Roads Transit. Ridership Report for February 2014 Operations & Oversight Committee Meeting

Speaker: Brian Dranzik, Fiscal & Policy Administrator Milwaukee County

METRO. Monthly Board Report. February 2009

Intermodal Connections with Light Rail in Phoenix, AZ Wulf Grote, P.E. Director, Planning & Development

Aurora Corridor to E Line

Transportation. Pages E-3 to E-145 PROPOSED FY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN (CIP) CCCRC Presentation Thursday, June 14, 2018

Understanding Rail and Bus Ridership

FY Transportation Capital Improvement Plan Update Arlington Committee for Transportation Choices

Arlington County 10-Year Transit Development Plan & Premium Transit Network Briefing. May 2016

CITY OF ELK GROVE CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

Title VI Fare Change Equity Analysis

SOLTRANS BOARD MEETING SUPPLEMENTAL REPORTS / HANDOUTS January 15, 2015 MEETING HANDOUTS

Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Board Action/Information Summary. MEAD Number:

Transit Signal Priority (TSP) Application to Miami-Dade Transit

Gratiot Avenue Transit Study Tech Memo #4: Ridership

FARE IMPACT STUDY. Prepared by the. Pioneer Valley Planning Commission

Spring Lake Park Mounds View North Oaks. Arden Hills. Shoreview. Roseville. Little Canada. Falcon Heights SNELLING. Lilydale. West Saint Paul 35E

METRO Light Rail: Changing Transit Markets in the Phoenix Metropolitan Area

February 4, Community Meeting August 2, :30 6:10 Presentation

RTC TRANSIT OPERATING STATISTICS RTC RIDE RTC RAPID RTC INTERCITY SIERRA SPIRIT

Typical Rush Hour Commute. PennyforTransportation.com

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Cheryl Thole CUTR/NBRTI, Senior Research Associate Tampa, Florida

RTC TRANSIT OPERATING STATISTICS RTC RIDE RTC RAPID RTC INTERCITY SIERRA SPIRIT

Paratransit Service. ADA Paratransit Service

ACTIA Programs Annual Compliance Report Reporting Year Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety Table 1: Summary of Expenditures and Accomplishments

Members of the Board of Directors. Wendy Knowles, Clerk of the Board. Metrolink Ridership and Revenue Annual Report

Transportation in Washoe County. Lee Gibson, Executive Director February 15, 2011

Service Proposal for the City of Ashland, Oregon

Transit Workshop with MPO Board

STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED

Evan Johnson, Tindale Oliver & Associates. Alan Danaher, P.E., PTOE, AICP, PTP

Final Study Recommendations AMES TRANSIT FEASIBILITY STUDY. For Public Review and Comment. October Ames Transit Feasibility Study

David Jickling, Public Transportation Director Regional Transportation Commission, Washoe County

MORE CONNECTIONS. Redesigning routes for the future of transit in Milwaukee County.

Calgary Transit Route 302 Southeast BRT Year One Review June

Prince George s County Council Retreat January 5, 2017

July 23, Transit Workshop

Beyond First First Last Last Mile Strategies. APA National Conference April 3, 2016 Chelsea Richer, AICP Fehr & Peers

September 2018 FY Key Performance Report

4 Ridership Growth Study

ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

FY 2018 I-66 Commuter Choice Program Presentation to the Northern Virginia Transportation Commission May 3,

Arterial Transitway Corridors Study. Ave

Scottsdale Road/Rural Road Alternatives Analysis (AA) Study. Arizona ITE/IMSA Spring Conference March 7, 2012

ANNUAL REPORT A DRIVING FORCE IN CENTRAL TEXAS

EL CAMINO REAL BUS RAPID TRANSIT (BRT) PROJECT

TRB Managed Lanes Conference May 22 24, 2012, Oakland, CA

City of Davenport CitiBus Public Transportation Study. April 2015

Arterial Transitway Corridors Study. Sept. 26, 2011

Table of Contents Table of Contents... 3 Glossary... 3 Charlottesville Area Transit (CAT) Transit Route abbreviations... 3 JAUNT Commuter Route

May 2018 FY Key Performance Report

Steve Feigenbaum Service Planning Manager Katharine Eagan, AICP Chief Operating Officer HART Tampa, Florida

Transit Ridership - Why the Decline and How to Increase. Hosted by the. Virginia Transit Association

Bus Rapid Transit ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS. Open House

395 Express Lanes Extension

RIDERSHIP PREDICTION

Short-Term Enhancements Improvements to keep Austin moving. MetroRapid

Guidelines for Providing Access to Public Transportation Stations APPENDIX C TRANSIT STATION ACCESS PLANNING TOOL INSTRUCTIONS

95 Express Annual Operations Report: Fiscal Year

TRANSIT PERFORMANCE IN THE I-66 INSIDE THE BELTWAY CORRIDOR

From Disarray to Complete Street:

Table of Contents Table of Contents... 3 Glossary... 3 Charlottesville Area Transit (CAT) Transit Route abbreviations... 3 JAUNT Commuter Route

Sustainable Transportation Plan Draft 4/24/2012

Performance Measures Year End 2015

North Hollywood to Pasadena BRT Corridor Technical Study. Eco-Rapid Transit/Orange Line Development Authority March 8, 2017

CITY OF COCOA BEACH 2025 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. Section VIII Mobility Element Goals, Objectives, and Policies

Craig Rempp, Transit Superintendent Mary Karlsson, Kimley-Horn. Mankato City Council Meeting 6/25/2018

Supplemental Information Item #F3 MANAGEMENT PLAN. Fiscal Year

Arterial Transitway Corridors Study

VIRGINIA RAILWAY EXPRESS

Dumbarton Transportation Corridor Study. Board of Directors December 6, 2017

TRANSIT & NON-MOTORIZED PLAN DRAFT FINAL REPORT Butte County Association of Governments

Seattle Transit Master Plan

Factors that Affect Fixed-Route Ridership Frequency Connections and accessibility Travel time Travel cost Service area coverage Reliability

REPORT. RECOMMENDATION: 1. That the report on Pilot Results Free Transit for Seniors, dated October 25, 2012, from Oakville Transit be received.

Transcription:

Capital Metro Monthly Ridership Report September 2017 (Fiscal Year-end 2017) Page 1 of 6

Ridership Summary This is a summary of Capital Metro system-wide ridership statistics for fiscal year-end and the month of September 2017 by mode of service. September Total Boardings by Mode Mode Sep-16 Sep-17 YTD 2016 YTD 2017 YTD Change Total Fixed Route 2,014,719 1,859,010-7.7% 22,342,908 21,932,011-1.8% Total Special Events 9,325 4,085-56.2% 215,850 158,889-26.4% Total MetroAccess 55,903 56,500 1.1% 672,825 674,098 0.2% Total UT Shuttle 394,794 322,727-18.3% 3,297,794 2,501,056-24.2% Total Rideshare 39,421 36,312-7.9% 432,537 459,555 6.2% Total MetroRail 69,931 69,360-0.8% 807,816 824,703 2.1% Total MetroRapid 255,475 365,815 43.2% 2,712,657 3,400,358 25.4% Total System 2,839,567 2,713,811-4.4% 30,482,386 29,950,671-1.7% September Average Daily Boardings by Mode Weekday Saturday Sunday Mode Sep-16 Sep-17 Sep-16 Sep-17 Sep-16 Sep-17 Total Fixed Route 77,963 72,807-6.6% 49,956 46,872-6.2% 35,507 33,702-5.1% Total Special Events 443 142-68.1% 1 123 9724.0% 3 128 - Total MetroAccess 2,268 2,309 1.8% 803 1,084 35.0% 688 979 42.4% Total UT Shuttle 18,670 16,021-14.2% - - #DIV/0! 546 462-15.4% Total Rideshare 1,314 1,210-7.9% 1,314 1,210-7.9% 1,314 1,211-7.9% Total MetroRail 2,990 3,050 2.0% 1,783 1,671-6.3% - - - Total MetroRapid 10,369 14,310 38.0% 5,034 9,218 83.1% 3,519 6,703 90.5% Year-end Average Daily Boardings by Mode Mode FY2016 FY2017 Weekday Saturday Sunday FY16 to FY17 FY2016 FY2017 FY16 to FY17 FY2016 FY2017 FY16 to FY17 Total Fixed Route 71,065 69,656-2.0% 44,680 44,629-0.1% 31,742 31,151-1.9% Total Special Events 205 99-51.9% 2,523 1,975-21.7% 361 362 - Total MetroAccess 2,231 2,239 0.4% 1,008 1,015 0.7% 886 877-1.1% Total UT Shuttle 15,488 12,109-21.8% 350 196-44.0% 622 492-20.9% Total Rideshare 1,184 1,260 6.4% 1,171 1,254 7.1% 1,182 1,258 6.4% Total MetroRail 2,837 2,904 2.4% 1,450 1,427-1.6% 81 81 - Total MetroRapid 8,923 10,976 23.0% 4,835 6,536 35.2% 3,103 4,403 41.9% All tables reflect ridership data as of October 18, 2017. Page 2 of 6

The table below shows the factors that have potential impacts on ridership in the current month. Other peer agencies have shown this type of information is useful to explain ridership changes. Factors Affecting Ridership this Month Factor Calendar Mix (FR, Rail, Rapid) Calendar Mix (UT Shuttle Full Service) Weather Impact Service Level September 2016 September 2017 Impact Weekday 21 20-1 Saturday 4 5 1 Sunday 5 5 0 Weekday 21 20-1 Sunday 3 3 0 Weekday 3 4 1 Saturday 2 0-2 Sunday 2 0-2 Special Events Fixed Route 0 0 0 MetroRail 1 1 0 MetroRapid 0 0 0 Fuel Prices* All 2.05 2.60 27% Fiscal Year 2017 Ridership Overview System-wide ridership is down 1.7% for the year. Discounting the challenges with UT Shuttle, system ridership would have been up 1% for the year. Average weekday was down 2.4%. Fixed Route Total annual Fixed Route ridership was down 1.8% from FY2016. Average weekday was down 2%. MetroAccess * Average monthly Gulf Coast All Grades Reformulated (http://www.eia.gov/petroleum/gasdiesel/) Red indicates potential negative impact on ridership Green indicates potential positive impact on ridership Page 3 of 6

MetroAccess held steady in FY2017 and was up just 0.2% compared to FY2016. UT Shuttle For FY2017, UT Shuttle showed a 24.2% decrease from FY2016. UT Shuttle service levels continue to be reduced due to the university s budget challenges, influencing system ridership decline. In addition, several routes were on long-term detour affecting ridership near campus. This rerouting is now permanent, however two of these services will now only serve the periphery of the campus and not return to operate through its center (thus it is not anticipated the ridership will return to previous levels). RideShare One stand out service for FY2017 was vride with its continued increase in ridership. Ridership was up 6.3% from FY2016. The program continues to successfully attract new groups with a fare structure more attractive to regional riders. There are now over 230 vehicles in the RideShare program, up from over 215 in FY2016. MetroRail MetroRail ridership was up 2.1% from FY2016. Average weekday was up 2.4%. Peak service is at maximum capacity. Upgrades to this service will come in 2018. MetroRapid The other stand out service for FY2017 is MetroRapid. This service was up 25.4% from FY2016. Average weekday was up 23%. Premium fares were eliminated on MetroRapid in January 2017 and enhanced frequency was implemented in August 2017. September 2017 System-wide ridership was down 4.4% compared to September 2016. Average weekday was also down 3.7%. There was one less weekday this September compared to last affecting September results. Fuel prices are inching up. UT Shuttle operated 5% fewer service hours this September compared to last. Excluding UT Shuttle effects, ridership would have been down only 2.2%. Connections 2025 plan was adopted by the board and is moving into implementation phase with public meetings continuing through October. Fixed Route & MetroRapid Page 4 of 6

Total month Fixed Route ridership was down 7.7% from September 2016. Average weekday was down 6.6%. Since the fare reduction on Rapid, riders have been moving over to that service. MetroRapid saw an increase of 43.2% from September 2016. Average weekday was up 38%. This increase is related to the fare reduction, eliminating the Premium fare with riders moving over from other services operating in the same corridor. Enhanced frequency also added to the MetroRapid increase in September. Looking at Fixed Route and MetroRapid bus services combined ridership was only down 2% from September 2016. Round Rock As a part of Fixed Route service, Capital Metro began providing service to the City of Round Rock in August 2017. For the first full month of service in September, there were over 4,000 boardings. Georgetown For the new service in Georgetown in September, there were 346 boardings on the Georgetown paratransit service and 1,583 boardings. MetroAccess MetroAccess showed an increase for September 2017 and was up 1.7% compared to last year. MetroAccess continues with efforts to manage this high cost service through eligibility evaluations, travel training, and pathway assessment. UT Shuttle For September 2017, UT Shuttle showed an 18.3% decrease from last September. There were 5% fewer revenue hours operated as well. Capital Metro continues to evaluate UT Shuttle service and potential strategies for increasing ridership. RideShare The vride program showed an 7.9% decrease for September. MetroRail MetroRail ridership was down 0.8%% from September 2016, while average weekday ridership was up 2.0% from the same period. MetroRail is at capacity during peak periods Page 5 of 6

and this service has maintained steady ridership levels over the past year. Upgrades to this service will come in 2018. Page 6 of 6