Impact of New ANSI/TIA-222-H Standard on Broadcast NAB * ERI Breakfast * Apr 11, 2018 James Ruedlinger, P.E

Similar documents
STRUCTURAL DESIGN FIGURE INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE 288aR

Basis of Structural Design

Analysis and Design of Elevated Intze Watertank and its Comparative Study in Different Wind Zones - using SAP2000

WIND FAILURES. Avoiding a Roof Failure Requires an Understanding of Many Factors Other Than Wind Speed. m-m. CatWOrl

Generation of an Annual Typical Daily Wind Speed for Heights Equal and Less than 10 meters for Urban Armidale NSW, Australia

2016 NC Coastal Local Governments Annual Meeting

Loads on Structures. Dead Load / Fixed Load Live Load / Imposed Load Earthquake Load Wind Load Snow Load

Forest Winds in Complex Terrain

home products support company info view cart Mechanical Notes from K7NV Wind Loads

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY CRITERIA

International Journal of Advance Engineering and Research Development

Micro-zoned Design Maps of Topographic Wind Effects and Exposure in the State of Hawaii Building Code

La Crescent Township Zoning Ordinance

Wind Loading Code for Building Design in Thailand

Fact Sheet Ordinance Regulating Erosion Threatened Structures

Flow modelling hills complex terrain and other issues

Photo by: Darryl Hatheway, 2011

JAR-23 Normal, Utility, Aerobatic, and Commuter Category Aeroplanes \ Issued 11 March 1994 \ Section 1- Requirements \ Subpart C - Structure \ General

WIND LOADING DESIGN GUIDE

WIND EFFECTS ON MONOSLOPED AND SAWTOOTH ROOFS

Physical Map Revisions in Connecticut due to Updated Coastal Flood Hazards F8: Maps in Transition

Topographic Wind Speed-up and Directionality Factors for Use in the City and County of Honolulu Building Code

Building Planning PART. Chapter 3. Chapter 3. Building Planning. Climatic and Geographic Design Criteria C

SUBPART C - STRUCTURE

PHSC 3033: Meteorology Air Forces

Effect of Wind Pressure on R.C Tall Buildings using Gust Factor Method

UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG LIBRARY. Hong Kong Collection

Evaluating the Design Safety of Highway Structural Supports

Critical Gust Pressures on Tall Building Frames-Review of Codal Provisions

Parasite Drag. by David F. Rogers Copyright c 2005 David F. Rogers. All rights reserved.

Sontek RiverSurveyor Test Plan Prepared by David S. Mueller, OSW February 20, 2004

HURRICANE SANDY LIMITED REEVALUATION REPORT UNION BEACH, NEW JERSEY DRAFT ENGINEERING APPENDIX SUB APPENDIX D SBEACH MODELING

Technical Brief - Wave Uprush Analysis Island Harbour Club, Gananoque, Ontario

MARLWOOD GOLF & COUNTRY CLUB WASAGA BEACH, ONTARIO

Memorandum. Dr. Wilbert Odem, Dr. Paul Trotta, and Mr. Justin Ramsey. From: Timothy Mahon, Patrick Belsheim, and Ali Alrayyes.

Fortified For Safer Living

ValidatingWindProfileEquationsduringTropicalStormDebbyin2012

International Journal of Advanced Engineering Technology E-ISSN

CHAPTER 8 ASSESSMENT OF COASTAL VULNERABILITY INDEX

GONE! Coastal Erosion Happens During Storms! Why Worry About Coastal Setbacks? Goals for Today

Anemometry. Anemometry. Wind Conventions and Characteristics. Anemometry. Wind Variability. Anemometry. Function of an anemometer:

Wind Flow Validation Summary

Outline. Wind Turbine Siting. Roughness. Wind Farm Design 4/7/2015

Sussex County, DE Preliminary Study Overview

D.B. Wilson Station CCR Landfill

Pedestrian Level Wind Study. 383 Slater Street. Ottawa, Ontario

VIRGINIA SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION BOARD GUIDANCE DOCUMENT ON DAM BREAK INUNDATION ZONE AND INCREMENTAL DAMAGE ANALYSIS AND MAPPING PROCEDURES

ESCI 343 Atmospheric Dynamics II Lesson 10 - Topographic Waves

Progress Report on the Design and Planning of an Infrastructure Improvement Project for the Sunnyside TIF District (Phase II)

Appendix 7. Wind and Comfort Impact Analysis

Alternative Impedances for Shortest Path Network Analysis for Cycling

Taranaki Tsunami Inundation Analysis. Prepared for Taranaki Civil Defence Emergency Management Group. Final Version

Uncontrolled copy not subject to amendment. Principles of Flight

ADOT Statewide Bicycle and Pedestrian Program Summary of Phase IV Activities APPENDIX B PEDESTRIAN DEMAND INDEX

Over or Around? Kinetic Energy vs. Potential Energy. Critical Factors

How to Do Flight Testing for TARC. Trip Barber NAR TARC Manager

RI Regulatory Setbacks & Buffers: Coastal Management Issues

EVALUATION OF WIND HAZARD OVER JEJU ISLAND

Farm Energy IQ. Farms Today Securing Our Energy Future. Wind Energy on Farms

Wind Flow Analysis on a Complex Terrain

USING THE MILITARY LENSATIC COMPASS

OPERATIONAL USE OF A WIND PROFILER FOR AVIATION METEOROLOGY ABSTRACT

DS/EN DK NA:2015 2nd edition

See the diagrams at the end of this manual for judging position locations.

Design wind pressures and forces are determined per equations given in section : q Gf Cp - qi GCpi : at height z above ground Resisting System

FINAL REPORT. Wind Assessment for: NEW OFFICE BUILDING AT ESSENDON FIELDS Essendon, Victoria, Australia

Creek Trash Assessment (CTA) Methodology (Demonstration: Mill Run Creek, Cheltenham, Pa.)

Pedestrian Level Wind Study. 979 Wellington Street West. Ottawa, Ontario

Article 1 Administration and Enforcement Article 2 Zoning Districts and Map

Business Park District Summary of Allowable Uses

Column w/laterals. Steel Column A992 50ksi Steel. 1 Rev

The study on micro-location of wind-electric field in the complex terrain

On the use of rotor equivalent wind speed to improve CFD wind resource mapping. Yavor V. Hristov, PhD Plant Performance and Modeling Vestas TSS

Risk Assessment. Residual Level of Risk (Considering existing and proposed controls) E, H, M, L or N See Tables 1 3 L

Pedestrian Level Wind Study. 383 Slater Street / 400 Albert Street. Ottawa, Ontario

Wind resource assessment over a complex terrain covered by forest using CFD simulations of neutral atmospheric boundary layer with OpenFOAM

Pedestrian Level Wind Study. 398, 402, 406 Roosevelt Avenue. Ottawa, Ontario

Wade Reynolds 1 Frank Young 1,2 Peter Gibbings 1,2. University of Southern Queensland Toowoomba 4350 AUSTRALIA

THURSTON COUNTY FIRE/EMS RESPONSE TO LARGE SCALE VIOLENT INCIDENTS

Basic Road Design. If you don't know where you are going, any road will get you there. Lewis Carroll

HOW FAST/FAR DOES FLY LINE FALL? N. Perkins of the University of Michigan, March 2003

Buggy Policy Document Date: 10 November 2017

APPENDIX C VEGETATED EMERGENCY SPILLWAY. VERSION 1.0 March 1, 2011

NESC WORKSHOP Revisions to Part 4 (Work Rules) Sam Stonerock. October 18, 2016

Investigation on Atmospheric Boundary Layers: Field Monitoring and Wind Tunnel Simulation

Tutorial. BOSfluids. Relief valve

External Pressure Coefficients on Saw-tooth and Mono-sloped Roofs

Available online at ScienceDirect. Procedia Engineering 161 (2016 )

CODE OF PRACTICE FOR DESIGN LOADS (OTHER THAN EARTHQUAKE) FOR BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES

The Work At Height Safety Association

ASCE D Wind Loading

The History of Coastal Flood Hazard Assessments in the Great Lakes

CROSS COURSE INSTRUCTION DOCUMENT

A New Approach in the GIS Bikeshed Analysis Considering of Topography, Street Connectivity, and Energy Consumption

REVETMENTS. Purposes and Operational Constraints. Purposes Erosion control o o. Revetment Design 4/5/2016. CE A676 Coastal Engineering

CIVL473 Fundamentals of Steel Design

HH Gregg Building Northgate Mall Cincinnati, Ohio May 14, 2014

RESILIENT INFRASTRUCTURE June 1 4, 2016

CFD AND EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF AERODYNAMIC DEGRADATION OF ICED AIRFOILS

Pedestrian Level Wind Study Bank Street. Ottawa, Ontario

Transcription:

Impact of New ANSI/TIA-222-H Standard on Broadcast 2018 NAB * ERI Breakfast * Apr 11, 2018 James Ruedlinger, P.E

Adoption ANSI/TIA-222 REV H: Current industry consensus standard Effective January 1, 2018 International Building Code (IBC): Adopted and enforced by state/local jurisdictions and contain collection of evolving standards by direct or indirect reference Latest revision is the 2018 IBC 2018 IBC references 222-H for antenna supporting structures and antennas 1

Site Parameters THEN NOW 2

Site Specific Parameters Four primary design parameters which must be established based upon the site-specific location to properly determine acting loads: 1) Risk Category Function of risk to human life, potential damage to facility, and structure s primary use 2) Environmental Loads Includes Wind, Ice, and Seismic loads 3) Site Exposure Category Based on the ground surface roughness from natural topography, vegetation, and constructed facilities of local surrounding Impacts wind load 4) Site Topographic Category Accounts for wind speed-up effects at isolated topographic features constituting abrupt changes in the general topography Impacts both wind and ice loads 3

Risk Category Risk Category I: Low Risk Examples: Redundant wireless antennas, small cell nodes, mobile single-load temporary structures (COW s), small residential applications, etc. Risk Category II: Moderate Risk Default Category Examples: Redundant service such as commercial TV, radio, wireless, microwave, etc. services where delay in restoring service deemed acceptable Risk Category III: Substantial Risk Examples: Non-redundant services, civil or national defense, rescue or disaster operations, military and navigation facilities Risk Category IV: Substantial Hazard to Community Examples: Essential services that would threaten functionality or integrity of Risk Category IV facilities 4

Risk Category I Examples LOW RISK 5

Risk Category IV Examples SUBSTANTIAL HAZARD 6

Wind & Ice Loads Wind speed based on Ultimate wind speed Ice maps based upon computer modeling and empirical observations Must pay special attention to regions located within shaded areas Note, 222-F did NOT provide explicit ice loading requirements 7

222-C (1987): F = P EFP ;where P = Wind Pressure (Zone A, B or C) EFP = Equivalent Flat Plate Area 222-F (2005): ANSI/TIA-222-H Impact Wind Loads F = G h 0.00256 K z V 2 (C a A a ) ;where G h = Gust Effect Factor 0.00256 = Air Density Constant for Standard Atmosphere (59º F) at Sea Level K z = Exposure Coefficient ~ Assumed Exposure Category C V = Wind Speed (Fastest-Mile) C a = Drag Factor A a = Projected Area 8

222-G (2017): ANSI/TIA-222-H Impact F = G h 0.00256 K z K zt K d I V 2 [K a (C a A a )] ;where Wind Loads G h = Gust Effect Factor ~ Based On Structure Type (Includes Dynamic Factor) 0.00256 = Air Density Constant for Standard Atmosphere (59º F) at Sea Level K z = Exposure Coefficient ~ Based On Exposure Category K zt = Topographic Factor ~ Based On Topographic Category K d = Wind Direction Probability Factor ~ Based On Structure Type I = Importance Factor ~ Based On Structure Class V = Wind Speed (3-Second Peak Gust) K a = Wake Interference Factor C a = Drag Factor A a = Projected Area 9

222-H (Current): F = G h 0.00256 K z K zt K s K e K d V 2 [K a (C a A a )] ;where Wind Loads G h = Gust Effect Factor ~ Based On Structure Type (Includes Dynamic Factor) 0.00256 = Air Density Constant for Standard Atmosphere (59º F) at Sea Level K z = Velocity Pressure Coefficient ~ Based On Exposure Category K zt = Topographic Factor ~ Based On Topographic Category K s = Rooftop Wind Speed-Up Factor K e = Ground Elevation Factor ~ Air Density Adjustment Factor K d = Wind Direction Probability Factor ~ Based On Structure Type V = Ultimate Wind Speed (3-Second Peak Gust) ~ Includes Importance Factor K a = Wake Interference Factor C a = Drag Factor A a = Projected Area 10

Exposure Category Site Exposure Category ~ based upon local surrounding ground surface roughness from natural topography, vegetation and constructed facilities. Three Categories: 1) Exposure B ~ atmospheric boundary layer above 1200 ft 2) Exposure C ~ atmospheric boundary layer above 900 ft 3) Exposure D ~ atmospheric boundary layer above 700 ft 11

Exposure Category B Urban and suburban areas Wooded areas Areas with closely spaced obstructions having the size of single-family dwellings or larger Limited to those areas for which terrain representative of Exposure B surrounds the structure in ALL directions for a distance of at least 2,600 ft or twenty times the height of the structure, whichever is greater up to 24,000 ft 12

Exposure Category C Open terrain with scattered obstructions having heights generally less than 30 ft Includes flat open country, grasslands and athletic fields Applies to locations where Exposure B or D do not apply 13

Exposure Category D Flat, unobstructed areas, shorelines and water surfaces Includes smooth mud flats, salt flats, and unbroken ice 14

Site Topographic Category ~ based on wind speed-up effects at isolated hills, ridges and escarpments constituting abrupt changes in the general topography Method 1 Categories: 1) Category 1 No abrupt changes 2) Category 2 Escarpments 3) Category 3 - Hills 4) Category 4 Ridges Method 2 Site-Specific Method 3 Site-Specific Topographic Category 15

Topographic Category 2 - Escarpment Feature consisting of a long steep slope separating two levels of gently sloping or level areas 16

Topographic Category 3 - Hill Feature consisting of a strong relief from average terrain in all directions 17

Topographic Category 4 - Ridge Feature with elongated crest consisting of a strong relief from average terrain in only two directions 18

Topographic Category - Method 2 Utilize site-specific method presented in 222-H to account for feature slope and structure setback 19

Topographic Category - Method 3 Determine site specific wind speed up effects using established site criteria or recognized methodology such as the SEAW s Rapid- Solutions Methodology 20

Questions? 21