Traffic Impact Statement

Similar documents
Traffic Impact Analysis Chatham County Grocery Chatham County, NC

5858 N COLLEGE, LLC N College Avenue Traffic Impact Study

List of Exhibits...ii

Traffic Impact Study. Westlake Elementary School Westlake, Ohio. TMS Engineers, Inc. June 5, 2017

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY And A TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS FOR A SENIOR LIVING AND APARTMENT DEVELOPMENT

King Soopers #116 Thornton, Colorado

6060 North Central Expressway Mixed-Use Site Dallas, Texas

Traffic Impact Study WestBranch Residential Development Davidson, NC March 2016

Glenn Avenue Corridor Traffic Operational Evaluation

Henderson Avenue Mixed-Use Development

COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT 2015 ROBERTSON ROAD OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for:

THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY

Traffic Impact Study. Roderick Place Columbia Pike Thompson s Station, TN. Transportation Group, LLC Traffic Engineering and Planning

Walmart (Store # ) 60 th Street North and Marion Road Sioux Falls, South Dakota

FORM A PASCO COUNTY ACCESS CONNECTION PERMIT APPLICATION

OFFICE/RETAIL DEVELOPMENT 1625 BANK STREET OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for: Canada Inc.

TRAFFIC STUDY GUIDELINES Clarksville Street Department

ORLEANS GARDENS SHOPPING CENTRE 1615 ORLEANS BOULEVARD CITY OF OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY. Prepared for:

Traffic Impact Analysis Walton Acres at Riverwood Athletic Club Clayton, NC

FRONT RANGE CROSSINGS TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY

Harrah s Station Square Casino

OTTAWA TRAIN YARDS PHASE 3 DEVELOPMENT CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY. Prepared for:

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Page 1 of 6

TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY PROPOSED RIVERFRONT 47 MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT

Marina Loft (DRC 51-R-12)

List of Attachments. Location Map... Site Plan... City of Lake Elsinore Circulation Element... City of Lake Elsinore Roadway Cross-Sections...

Transportation Impact Study for Abington Terrace

INDUSTRIAL BUILDING 3009 HAWTHORNE ROAD CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW REVISED. Prepared for: Canada Inc.

Design Traffic Technical Memorandum

Troutbeck Farm Development

Volume 1 Traffic Impact Analysis. Texas Odyssey TIA Dallas, Texas. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Dallas, Texas. May 23, 2018

Truck Climbing Lane Traffic Justification Report

TABLE TRAFFIC ANALYSIS SCENARIOS

INDUSTRIAL BUILDING 1660 COMSTOCK ROAD CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW. Prepared for:

Technical Memorandum TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. RIDLEY ROAD CONVENIENCE STORE Southampton County, VA. Prepared for: Mr. David Williams.

Transportation Advisory Board

MEDICAL/OFFICE BUILDING 1637 BANK STREET OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW. Prepared for:

Donahue Drive Corridor Traffic Operational Evaluation

Waterford Lakes Small Area Study

HILTON GARDEN INN HOTEL HOTEL EXPANSION 2400 ALERT ROAD, OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for:

TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS REPORT US Route 6 Huron, Erie County, Ohio

1609 E. FRANKLIN STREET HOTEL TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

PINESTONE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY Travelers Rest, South Carolina

Patuxent Green Golf Course

Traffic Impact Study Little Egypt Road Development Denver, North Carolina June 2017

9 Leeming Drive Redevelopment Ottawa, ON Transportation Brief. Prepared By: Stantec Consulting Ltd.

Table of Contents FIGURES TABLES APPENDICES. Traffic Impact Study Hudson Street Parking Garage MC Project No.: A Table of Contents

Draft Report. Traffic Impact Study. Superstore, Wal-Mart, and Kent Development. Yarmouth, Nova Scotia. Prepared for

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY CRITERIA

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY COMPREHENSIVE UPDATE TOWN OF THOMPSON S STATION, TENNESSEE PREPARED FOR: THE TOWN OF THOMPSON S STATION

VIVA RETIREMENT COMMUNITIES OAKVILLE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY

FINAL DESIGN TRAFFIC TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

joint access drive. will be

The proposed development is located within 800m of an existing Transit Station where infill developments and intensification are encouraged.

MEETING FACILITY 2901 GIBFORD DRIVE CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for: Holiday Inn Express 2881 Gibford Drive Ottawa, ON K1V 2L9

THE LANDMARK AT TALBOT PARK

IOTA CAROL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT TRAFFIC ANALYSIS

TRAFFIC ASSESSMENT River Edge Colorado

QUICKIE C STORE AND GAS BAR 1780 HERON ROAD OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for:

URBAN QUARRY HEADQUARTERS 2717 STEVENAGE DRIVE CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW. Prepared for: Urban Quarry 4123 Belgreen Drive, Ottawa K1G 3N2

Meadowlake Ranch Traffic Impact Analysis (LSC #184600) August 27, 2018

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. Creekside Thornton, Colorado. For. August 2015 November 2015 Revised: August Prepared for:

Atlanta Braves Stadium and Mixed- Use Development

Traffic Impact Study for Rolling Ridge Redevelopment

HENDERSON DEVELOPMENT 213, 217, 221, 221 ½, 223 HENDERSON AVENUE and 65 TEMPLETON STREET OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW.

Table of Figures. Table of Tables. Table 1: Traffic Volumes Ramblas Delay. Table 2: Las

Traffic Circulation Study for Neighborhood Southwest of Mockingbird Lane and Airline Road, Highland Park, Texas

Prepared for Lutheran Services Carolinas. Project Number: /07/2017. Trinity Landing. New Hanover County, NC

HOLIDAY INN HOTEL 235 KING EDWARD AVENUE CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for:

Bistro 6. City of Barrie. Traffic Impact Study for Pratt Hansen Group Inc. Type of Document: Final Report. Project Number: JDE 1748

ENKA INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL

Waterford Lakes Small Area Study

FAIRFIELD INN & SUITES HOTEL 135 THAD JOHNSON PRIVATE OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for:

REDEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY

DRAFT. Corridor study. Honeysuckle Road. October Prepared for the City of Dothan, AL. Prepared by Gresham, Smith and Partners

Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) Process and Procedures Manual. September 2017

The Cape Cod Five Cents Savings Bank

Durrance Elementary School

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY

2. Existing Conditions

FAIRFIELD - RYAN S CORNER TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS LOUDOUN COUNTY, VIRGINIA

Traffic Impact and Access Study PROPOSED DURKEE FARM ESTATES. Foster Street Littleton, Massachusetts. Prepared for: Grimes Road, LLC.

Highway 111 Corridor Study

Date: September 7, Project #: Re: Spaulding Youth Center Northfield, NH Property. Traffic Impact Study

Subject: Solberg Avenue / I-229 Grade Separation: Traffic Analysis

Shockoe Bottom Preliminary Traffic and Parking Analysis

The current document is revised based on the comments received on:

2016 Church Street Access Study. 100 Clinton Square 126 North Salina Street, Suite 100 Syracuse, NY

BLUE SEA VILLAGE MER BLEUE 2159 MER BLEUE ROAD OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ASSESSMENT. Prepared for: Ontario Limited.

Abrams Associates. Transportation Impact Analysis. City of Rocklin. Prepared for: David Mohlenbrok City of Rocklin 4081 Alvis Court Rocklin, CA 95677

J Street and Folsom Boulevard Lane Conversion Project (T ) Before and After Traffic Evaluation

NEW YORK CENTRAL PARK SUBDIVISION BLAIS STREET/ST-PIERRE STREET EMBRUN, ONTARIO TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. Prepared for:

METHODOLOGY. Signalized Intersection Average Control Delay (sec/veh)

Chapter 4 Traffic Analysis

Traffic Impact Study. for the. Proposed Commercial Development Clayton Road and Henry Avenue/Schoettler Road. Ballwin, Missouri.

TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS... I APPENDICES... III LIST OF EXHIBITS... V LIST OF TABLES... VII LIST OF ABBREVIATED TERMS...

Orange Center Elementary School

RAPID CITY, SOUTH DAKOTA

Intersection Traffic Control Feasibility Study

CITY OF ALPHARETTA DOWNTOWN MASTER PLAN TRAFFIC EVALUATION

Transcription:

Traffic Impact Statement Mixed Use Development, US 41 and Old Trail Drive aka Tide-Starbucks 4900 9 th Street North General Development Site Plan (GDSP) Collier County, FL 10/6/2015 Prepared for: Prepared by: Peninsula Engineering Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 2600 Golden Gate Parkway 1205 Piper Boulevard, Suite 202 Naples, FL 34105 Naples, FL 34110 Phone: 239-403-6818 Phone: 239-566-9551 Email: ntrebilcock@trebilcock.biz

Statement of Certification I certify that this Traffic Impact Statement has been prepared by me or under my immediate supervision and that I have experience and training in the field of Traffic and Transportation Engineering. Norman J. Trebilcock, AICP, P.E. FL Registration No. 47116 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 1205 Piper Boulevard, Suite 202 Naples, FL 34110 Company Cert. of Auth. No. 27796 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 2

Table of Contents Project Description... 4 Trip Generation... 6 Trip Distribution and Assignment... 8 Background Traffic... 10 Existing and Future Roadway Network... 11 Project Impacts to Area Roadway Network Link Analysis... 11 Site Access Turn Lanes Analysis... 12 Improvement Analysis... 13 Mitigation of Impact... 13 APPENDICES Appendix A: Project Master Site Plan... 14 Appendix B: Trip Generation Calculations ITE 9th Edition... 16 Appendix C: City of Naples Concurrency System Management Element Roadways LOS 2011-2014 (Excerpts)... 23 Appendix D: Turning Movements Exhibits... 28 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 3

Project Description The Proposed Mixed Use Development, aka Tide-Starbucks has a street address of 4900 9th Street North and is located at the southwest corner of US 41 (Tamiami Trail [SR 45]) and Old Trail Drive intersection in Naples. The subject site currently has an existing four story commercial office building and paved parking lot, and is located in Section 16, Township 49S, Range 25E, Collier County, Florida. Refer to Fig. 1 Project Location Map, which follows, and Appendix A: Project Master Site Plan. Fig. 1 Project Location Map Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 4

The site is approximately 3.09 acres and is currently zoned HC Highway Commercial. The project proposes reconfiguring the west portion of the site to include a new 5,157 sf building. The building will consist of a 3,038 sf Tide Dry Cleaners on the west side of the building and a 2,119 sf Starbucks Coffee with additional 450 sf outdoor dining on the east side. Tide Dry Cleaners will have a valet area for customers to drop off and pick up their clothing in an express type operation. The Starbucks Coffee has a U shaped drive-thru lane that allows for 1 car at the drive-thru window with additional stacking of 9 vehicles. A methodology meeting was held via email with the City of Naples Transportation Planning staff on September 4, 2015. For purposes of this evaluation, the project build-out year is assumed to be consistent with the City of Naples 2017 planning horizon. The project s site trip generation is based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 9 th Edition. ITE does not have a Land Use Code (LUC) for dry cleaners use. Consistent with the ITE Manual descriptions, this traffic analysis assumes Specialty Retail (ITE LUC 826) is the closest fit as a related activity. The project provides a highest and best use scenario with respect to the project s proposed trip generation. The development program is illustrated in Table 1. Development Land Use Table 1 Development Program ITE Land Use Code Total Size Planning Horizon Year Existing General Office Building 710 40,300sf Existing Proposed Proposed Specialty Retail (Tide Dry Cleaners) Coffee/Donut Shop with Drive-Thru* 826 3,038sf 2017 937 2,569sf* 2017 Note(s): *includes 450sf outdoor dining area. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 5

Trip Generation The software program OTISS (Online Traffic Impact Study Software, Version 3.1.1.193) is used to create the raw unadjusted trip generation for the project. The ITE rates and equations are used for the trip generation calculations, as applicable. The ITE-OTISS trip generation calculation worksheets are provided in Appendix B: ITE Trip Generation Calculations. The internal capture accounts for a reduction in external traffic because of the interaction between the multiple land uses in a site. ITE guidelines are used for the calculation of internal capture. For the purposes of this analysis and following Collier County TIS Guidelines recommendations, the overall internal capture rate does not exceed 20%. The pass-by trips account for traffic that is already on the external roadway network and stops at the project on the way to a primary trip destination. It should be noted that the driveway volumes are not reduced as a result of the pass-by reduction, only the traffic added to the surrounding streets and intersections. As such, pass-by trips are not deducted for operational-access analysis (total external traffic for proposed conditions is accounted for). Due to the nature of the proposed development, a considerable portion of the traffic generated will be pass-by trips. The ITE Manual does not include pass-by rates for the proposed land uses. As such, this analysis assumes a 50% peak hour pass-by rate consistent with pass-by rate illustrated in ITE Manual for LUC 934 Fast-Food Restaurant with Drive-Through Window. In addition, the two-way daily pass-by capture rates are assumed to be 10% lower than the peak hour capture rate. The project proposed build-out trip generation is illustrated in Table 2A. The trip generation analysis for the existing developed conditions is shown in Table 2B. The Table 2A trip generation Total External values (project proposed conditions) are to be used for the site access analysis. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 6

The roadway link concurrency analysis on the surrounding roadway network is analyzed based on the net new trips (non-pass-by traffic) generated as a result of the proposed GDSP (as shown in Table 2C). Table 2A Trip Generation (Proposed Conditions) Average Weekday Tide-Starbucks Development 24 Hour Two-Way Volume AM Peak Hour Table 2B Trip Generation (Existing Conditions) Average Weekday* PM Peak Hour Land Use Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total General Office Building 658 81 11 92 21 103 124 Specialty Retail (Tide Dry Cleaners) 135 10 11 21 4 4 8 Coffee/Donut Shop with Drive-Thru 2,104 132 126 258 55 55 110 Total Traffic 2,897 223 148 371 80 162 242 Total Internal Capture 236 0 0 0 5 5 10 Total External 2,661 223 148 371 75 157 232 Total pass-by Traffic 832 71 69 140 28 28 56 Total non-pass-by Traffic 1,829 152 79 231 47 129 176 Tide-Starbucks Development 24 Hour Two-Way Volume AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Land Use Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total General Office Building 658 81 11 92 21 103 124 Note(s): *per ITE Trip Generation Manual, no internal capture and pass-by rates are considered. Tide-Starbucks Development Table 2C Trip Generation (Net New Traffic) Average Weekday 24 Hour Two-Way Volume AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Land Use Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total Proposed GDSP (Total Non-Pass-By) 1,829 152 79 231 47 129 176 Existing Development Total Non-Pass-By 658 81 11 92 21 103 124 Proposed Net New Traffic (Total Non- Pass-By) 1,171 71 68 139 26 26 52 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 7

Trip Distribution and Assignment Projected traffic generated by the Tide-Starbucks development is assigned to the adjacent roadways using the knowledge of the area and as coordinated with City of Naples Transportation Planning staff. Old Trail Drive and Solana Road are local roadways and are not traffic monitored facilities. The assignment of the net new proposed site-generated trips is shown in Table 3, Project Traffic Distribution for PM Peak Hour, and is graphically depicted on Fig. 2 Project Distribution by Percentage and by PM Peak Hr. Roadway Link Tamiami Trail North (US 41) Tamiami Trail North (US 41) Table 3 Project Traffic Distribution for PM Peak Hour Roadway Link Location Old Trail Dr north to Pine Ridge Rd Old Trail Dr south to GG Parkway Distribution of Project Traffic PM Peak Hr Project Traffic Vol.* Enter Exit 35% SB-9 NB-9 35% NB-9 SB-9 Old Trail Drive West of project 15% EB-4 WB-4 Solana Road East of Tamiami Trail 15% WB-4 EB-4 Note(s): *Peak hour, peak direction traffic volumes are underlined and bold to be used in Roadway Link Level of Service calculations. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 8

Fig. 2 Project Distribution by Percentage and by PM Peak Hour Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 9

Background Traffic Average background traffic growth rates were estimated for the segments of the roadway network in the study area using the City of Naples Concurrency System Management Element Roadways-Level of Service for 2013, the 2014 and the 2015 (1 st quarter only) annual traffic counts. For details see Appendix C: City of Naples Concurrency System Management Element Roadways LOS for 2011 2014 (Excerpts). The adopted Level of Service (LOS) for City of Naples streets is LOS C. The concurrency report contains the adopted LOS C two-way peak hour service volume (US 41 5,190) and counted 2014 two-way peak hour traffic (US 41 3,907). Based on the City of Naples traffic count data and the general build-out nature of the City, a minimum growth rate of 2.0% is assumed. Table 4, Background Traffic without Project illustrates the application of projected growth rates to generate the projected background (without project) peak hour traffic volume for the future horizon year 2017. Roadway Link Tamiami Trail North (US 41) Tamiami Trail North (US 41) Note(s): Table 4 Background Traffic without Project (2014-2017) Roadway Link Location Old Trail Dr north to Pine Ridge Rd Old Trail Dr south to GG Parkway 2014 Pk Hr, Two-Way Background Traffic Volume (trips/hr) Projected Traffic Annual Growth Rate (%/yr)* Growth Factor 2017 Projected Pk Hr, Two-Way Background Traffic Volume w/out Project (trips/hr)** 3,907 2.0% 1.0612 4,147 3,907 2.0% 1.0612 4,147 The projected 2017 Peak Hour Background Traffic is the calculated projected future volume based on data published in the City of Naples Concurrency System Management Element Roadways Level of Service for 2014. *2% minimum or historical growth rate; Growth Factor = (1+Annual Growth Rate) ^3. **2017 Projected Volume= 2014 Pk Hr Background Traffic Volume x Growth Factor. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 10

Existing and Future Roadway Network The existing roadway conditions are extracted from the City of Naples Concurrency System Management Element Roadways. Additional information was collected from the Collier County 2014 Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR) and current Collier County 5-Year Work Program. Roadway improvements that are currently under construction or are scheduled to be constructed within the five year Collier County Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) or Capital Improvement program (CIP) are considered to be committed improvements. As no such improvements were identified in the Collier County 2014 AUIR, the evaluated roadways are anticipated to remain as such through project build-out. The existing and future roadway conditions are illustrated in Table 5. Table 5 Existing and Future Roadway Conditions Roadway Link Tamiami Trail North (US 41) Tamiami Trail North (US 41) Roadway Link Location Old Trail Dr north to Pine Ridge Rd Old Trail Dr south to GG Parkway Exist Roadway Min. Standard LOS Two-Way, Peak Hr Capacity Volume LOS C Future Project Build out Roadway 6D C 5,190 6D 6D C 5,190 6D Note(s): 2U = 2-lane undivided roadway; 4D, 6D, 8D =4-lane, 6-lane, 8-lane divided roadway, respectively; LOS = Level of Service. Project Impacts to Area Roadway Network Link Analysis The adopted Level of Service (LOS) for City of Naples streets is LOS C. Roadway capacity volumes and peak hour traffic volumes are illustrated based on City of Naples Concurrency System Management Element Roadways Level of Service for year 2014. None of the analyzed roadway links are projected to operate below the adopted LOS C standard with or without the project at 2017 future conditions. Based on this criterion, this project does not create any significant and adverse impacts to the area roadway network. Table 6, Roadway Link Level of Service illustrates the LOS impacts of the project on the roadway network closest to the project. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 11

Roadway Link Tamiami Trail East (US 41) Tamiami Trail East (US 41) Note(s): Table 6 Roadway Link Level of Service (LOS) With Project in the Year 2017 Roadway Link Location Old Trail Dr north to Pine Ridge Rd Old Trail Dr south to GG Parkway Two-Way, Peak Hr Capacity Volume LOS C 5,190 LOS C 5,190 Peak Dir, Two-Way (Project Vol Added)* 2017 Two-Way, Peak Hr Volume w/project ** % Volume Capacity Impact By Project Remaining Volume Capacity LOS C exceeded without Project? Yes/No LOS C exceeded with Project? Yes/No 18 4,165 0.35% 1,025 No No 18 4,165 0.35% 1,025 No No * Refer to Table 3 from this report. **2017 Projected Volume= 2017 background (refer to Table 4) + Project Volume added. Site Access Turn Lanes Analysis Connection to the subject site is provided as follows: two existing full access driveways on eastbound Old Trail Drive, and two internal connections to adjacent property to the south. For more details refer to Appendix A: Project Master Site Plan. The site access turn lane analysis is calculated based on the proposed future overall build-out total external trips during the weekday AM and PM peak hour (as illustrated in Table 2A). US 41 (SR 45 Tamiami Trail North) is a six-lane north-south urban divided arterial under the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) jurisdiction and has a posted legal speed of 45 mph in the vicinity of project. Old Trail Drive is currently an undivided two-lane public local roadway, west of Tamiami Trail North and has a posted legal speed of 25 mph in the vicinity of the project. The estimated project trips at driveway locations are illustrated in Appendix D: Turning Movements Exhibits. Project Western Access Old Trail Drive The project accesses are evaluated for turn lane warrants based on the Collier County Construction Standards Handbook: (a) two-lane roadways 40 vph for right-turn lane/20 vph for left-turn lane; (b) multi-lane divided roadways right turn lanes shall Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 12

always be provided; (c) when new median openings are permitted, they shall always include left-turn lanes. The project is expected to generate 22 and 8 vph right turning movements during AM and PM peak hour, respectively, which is below the 40vph threshold values. As such, a dedicated eastbound-right turn lane is not warranted at this location. The project is expected to generate 167 and 56 vph left turning movements during AM and PM peak hour, respectively, which is above the 20 vph threshold value. As such, a dedicated westbound-left turn lane is warranted at this location. At the minimum, the westbound left-turn lane should be 200ft long to accommodate 50ft taper and 150ft traffic storage. Old Trail Drive is a low speed facility. The proposed left-turn lane is approximately 230ft and it was designed to the maximum extent under pavement marking restrictions. As such, the proposed left-turn lane is considered adequate to accommodate storage needs for proposed project traffic. Project Eastern Access Old Trail Drive The project is expected to generate 12 and 4vph right turning movements during AM and PM peak hour, respectively, which is below the 40vph threshold value. As such, a dedicated eastbound right-turn lane is not warranted at this location. Improvement Analysis Based on the link analysis and trip distribution, the proposed project is not a significant and adverse traffic generator for the roadway network at this location. There is adequate and sufficient roadway capacity to accommodate the proposed development generated trips without adversely affecting adjacent roadway network level of service. Based upon the results of site access turn lane analysis, the proposed left-turn lane on westbound Old Trail Drive is adequate to accommodate projected site traffic conditions. Mitigation of Impact The developer proposes to pay the appropriate City of Naples/Collier County Road Impact Fees as building permits are issued for the project, as applicable. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 13

Appendix A: Project Master Site Plan (1 Sheet) Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 14

Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 15

Appendix B: Trip Generation Calculations ITE 9th Edition (6 Sheets) Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 16

Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 17

Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 18

Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 19

Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 20

Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 21

Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 22

Appendix C: City of Naples Concurrency System Management Element Roadways LOS 2011-2014 (Excerpts) (4 Sheets) Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 23

4099 9th Street North Mixed Use Development aka Tide-Starbucks GDSP TIS October 2015 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 24

4099 9th Street North Mixed Use Development aka Tide-Starbucks GDSP TIS October 2015 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 25

4099 9th Street North Mixed Use Development aka Tide-Starbucks GDSP TIS October 2015 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 26

Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 27

Appendix D: Turning Movements Exhibits (2 Sheets) Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 28

Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 29

Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 30