Cedar Avenue Transitway/ METRO Red Line Implementation Plan Update. Metropolitan Transportation Committee July 27, 2015

Similar documents
Bus Rapid Transit Plans

Highway Transitway Corridor Study

I-35W Solutions Alliance Project Update July 13, 2017

Metropolitan Council Transportation Committee

ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Title. Metropolitan Council Transportation Committee December 12, Brad Larson Metro District MnDOT

Enhancing Return on Investment for MnPASS Express Lanes

ACTION TRANSMITTAL No

Arterial Transitway Corridors Study. Sept. 26, 2011

ACTION TRANSMITTAL No

Spring Lake Park Mounds View North Oaks. Arden Hills. Shoreview. Roseville. Little Canada. Falcon Heights SNELLING. Lilydale. West Saint Paul 35E

Arterial Transitway Corridors Study. Ave

ACTION TRANSMITTAL No

Arterial Transitway Corridors Study

Preliminary Transportation Analysis

ROUTES 55 / 42 / 676 BUS RAPID TRANSIT LOCALLY PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE

North Shore Transportation Improvement Strategy

Community Task Force July 25, 2017

Highway Transitway Corridor Study

Midtown Corridor Alternatives Analysis

Arlington County 10-Year Transit Development Plan & Premium Transit Network Briefing. May 2016

Presentation of Staff Draft March 18, 2013 COUNTYWIDE TRANSIT CORRIDORS FUNCTIONAL MASTER PLAN

Evaluation of Alternatives and Final Screening Results November 20 and 21, 2013

Overview: Phase 3 Draft Development and Circulation Plans, White Bear Station

Highway 169 Mobility Study Technical Advisory Committee Meeting #9 Meeting Record

5. RUNNINGWAY GUIDELINES

Gratiot Avenue Transit Study Tech Memo #4: Ridership

Managed Lane Bus Rapid Transit Alternative Technical Memo

Customer Service and Operations Committee. Board Action Item III-A. February 12, 2015

South King County High-Capacity Transit Corridor Study

MnPASS System Today and the Future

ITS-NY ANNUAL MEETING Bus Rapid Transit in New York City: Bus Lane Operations on One-Way Arterial Streets

Seattle Transit Master Plan

MARTA Expansion Update

CITY OF SEATTLE RESOLUTION. WHEREAS, the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) led the Seattle

Countywide Bus Rapid Transit Study Consultant s Report (Final) July 2011 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. Barrier system (from TOA)

Basalt Creek Transportation Refinement Plan Recommendations

Bus Rapid Transit ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS. Open House

Technical Working Group November 15, 2017

In station areas, new pedestrian links can increase network connectivity and provide direct access to stations.

Highway Transitway Corridor Study

BICYCLE/PEDESTRIAN ACCESS TO TRANSIT SAFETY ASSESSMENT FOR EXISTING AND PLANNED SECTIONS OF US 19

Arterial Transitway Corridors Study

EL CAMINO REAL BUS RAPID TRANSIT (BRT) PROJECT

Corridor Advisory Group and Task Force Meeting #10. July 27, 2011

Countywide Transit Corridors Functional Master Plan

FY Transportation Capital Improvement Plan Update Arlington Committee for Transportation Choices

Wellington Public Transport Spine Study

Final Study Recommendations AMES TRANSIT FEASIBILITY STUDY. For Public Review and Comment. October Ames Transit Feasibility Study

ADOT Statewide Bicycle and Pedestrian Program Summary of Phase IV Activities APPENDIX B PEDESTRIAN DEMAND INDEX

Executive Summary Route 30 Corridor Master Plan

Purpose and Need. Chapter Introduction. 2.2 Project Purpose and Need Project Purpose Project Need

Operational Comparison of Transit Signal Priority Strategies

ITEM 2.3 South of Fraser Rapid Transit Surrey-Langley technology decision. That the Mayors Council on Regional Transportation receive this report.

TRB Managed Lanes Conference May 22 24, 2012, Oakland, CA

BRIEFING ON PROPOSED ADDITIONS AND CHANGES Additions and Changes to Projects Proposed for Inclusion in the 2015 CLRP Update

VIRGINIA RAILWAY EXPRESS

Major Bike Routes 102 Avenue Workshop April 21, 2015

TPA Committee Meetings May 2018

Rapid Transit in Montgomery County

Southwest Bus Rapid Transit (SW BRT) Functional Planning Study - Executive Summary January 19 LPT ATTACHMENT 2.

Capital and Strategic Planning Committee. Item III - B. April 12, WMATA s Transit-Oriented Development Objectives

Priced Managed Lanes in America. October 2013

Eliminate on-street parking where it will allow for a dedicated bus only lane %

Interim Transit Ridership Forecast Results Technical Memorandum

Wilshire Boulevard Bus Rapid Transit Project

I-105 Corridor Sustainability Study (CSS)

PURPOSE AND NEED SUMMARY 54% Corridor Need 1. Corridor Need 2. Corridor Need 3. Corridor Need 4. Corridor Need 5

Community Task Force November 15, 2017

MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT THE MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION

Multi Modal Transit Access Plan KIPDA ID # 239. Project Type: STUDY

Bus Rapid Transit Symposium. THOMAS CENTER SPANISH COURT October 14, 2008

1. Operate along freeways, either in regular traffic lanes, in high-occupancy vehicle (HOV) lanes, or along the shoulders.

POLICY ADVISORY COMMITTEE

State Road 54/56 Tampa Bay s Northern Loop. The Managed Lane Solution Linking I-75 to the Suncoast Parkway

Santa Ana Creating Community Together

PRINCE GEORGE S PLAZA METRO AREA PEDESTRIAN PLAN

BALBOA AREA: TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS & PLANNING

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT 7 DISTRICT WIDE BICYCLE/PEDESTRIAN ACCESS TO TRANSIT SAFETY ASSESSMENT AND IMPROVEMENT PLAN

FY STIP. Austin District. November Quarterly Revisions HIGHWAY STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

Bus Rapid Transit on Silicon Valley s El Camino Real: Working Together to Create a Grand Boulevard Steven Fisher

Integrated Corridor Approach to Urban Transport. O.P. Agarwal World Bank Presentation at CODATU XV Addis Ababa, 25 th October 2012

Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority

Sixth Line Development - Transit Facilities Plan

Geary Corridor Bus Rapid Transit SFMTA Citizens Advisory Committee

Hennepin County Bicycle and Pedestrian Planning

Caltrain Bicycle Parking Management Plan

Providence Downtown Transit Connector STAKEHOLDER MEETING #2. Stakeholder Meeting #1 October 24, 2016

David Jickling, Public Transportation Director Regional Transportation Commission, Washoe County

From Disarray to Complete Street:

Having held a public hearing, that Council approve:

Topics To Be Covered. Summarize Tier 2 Council Direction Discuss Mill and Ash Alternatives Next Steps

C C C

North Coast Corridor:

Regional Bicycle Barriers Study

US 19 Pedestrian and Bicycle Safe Access to Transit Corridor Study

Transportation. Pages E-3 to E-145 PROPOSED FY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN (CIP) CCCRC Presentation Thursday, June 14, 2018

Highway 169 Mobility Study Policy Advisory Committee Meeting #5 Meeting Record

About the Wilmington Downtown Circulation Study

TRANSPORTATION NEEDS ASSESSMENT

Transcription:

Cedar Avenue Transitway/ METRO Red Line Implementation Plan Update Metropolitan Transportation Committee July 27, 2015

Purpose of Cedar Avenue Transitway Previous IPU August 2011 Review current transit service and facilities Plan future stages IPU Comprehensive look from Mall of America to County Highway 70

IPU Decision Making Process

Revised Goals 1. Provide a variety of safe, reliable, and attractive transit services in the corridor. 2. Improve mobility and accessibility within the Cedar Avenue Transitway. 3. Improvements are cost-effective and wellpositioned for implementation. 4. Enhance and promote transit oriented development that is compatible with community goals and helps increase ridership.

2040 Ridership- Average Weekday Boardings Route Type Existing 2040 No Build 2040 Build Corridor Local ( not guideway) 600 2,300 3,100 Express/Local (guideway) [Guideway Boardings] 4,600 [3,300] 9,200 [6,600] 10,100 [7,400] Red Line -to- 800 2,800 4,700 Total Guideway Boardings 5,400 12,000 14,800

Red Line -to- Daily Boardings 1800 1600 1400 1200 1000 Average Daily Ridership Summary 2014 Count: 815 2040 No Build: 2,800 2040 Build: 4,700 800 600 400 200 0 Mall of America Cedar Grove Cliff Road Palomino 140th Street 147th Street Apple Valley Transit 161st Street Glacier Way Lakeville Cedar 195th Street 215th Street Boardings and Alightings are depicted in Production/Attraction format

EVALUATION MEASURES

Evaluation Measures Evaluation measures were developed to establish priorities and meet performance goals Ridership Cost Effectiveness Categorized into: Measures with identified thresholds Indicators Safety Measures with identified thresholds helped determine priorities

High Medium Low

STAGING PLAN

Draft Staging Plan Identifies future capital investments (2015 $) in five stages Estimated timeframes, contingent on meeting thresholds: Stage 1: 2010-2015 Stage 2: 2015-2020 Stage 3: 2020-2025 Stage 4: 2025-2040 Stage 5: 2025-2040 Potential Future Projects 11

Stage 2 2015-2020 Capital Investments Cost Mall of America Improvements $6,700,346* Cedar Grove Online $13,250,000 Apple Valley Transit Expansion $8,196,400 Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvements $100,000 Corridor-wide Area Planning (7 s) $100,000 per station Study of Palomino, Cliff, Cedar Grove and TH 77 Managed Lane Concepts- includes park and ride siting $500,000 *Red Line portion of Mall of America cost 12

Stage 3 2020-2025 Capital Investments Cost Cliff Road Inline $2,600,000 Palomino Online and Park and Ride* Includes METRO Red Line Includes new park and ride facility with capacity for 700 vehicles $32,000,000 Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvements $100,000 METRO Red Line Vehicle Replacement (7 vehicles in 2025) $4,100,000 Update Cedar Transitway IPU $400,000 *Future study identified in Stage 2 will refine concepts and costs 13

Stage 4 Capital Investments Cost Lakeville Cedar $2,800,000 Park and Ride Capacity Expansion in Northern Apple Valley or Eagan (300 spaces) $9,300,000 Technology (TSP, Fiber) $2,900,000 Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvements $100,000 14

Stage 5 Capital Investments Cost 215 th Street Current park and pool converted to park and ride- no expansion of park and ride $3,000,000 Red Line BRT Vehicle Purchase (2) $1,200,000 Storage and Maintenance Facility Allowance (Red Line and Local/Express vehicles) $470,000 Technology (TSP, Fiber) $3,500,000 Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvements $100,000 15

Potential Future Projects These can accelerate to an earlier phase if conditions (ridership and land use) change: 147th Street Pedestrian Bridge 161st Street Glacier Way 195th Street Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvements associated with 161st Street, Glacier Way and 195th Street stations Additional local and express vehicle purchase (up to 12 vehicles) TH 77 MnPASS Investment 16

IPU Available for Public Comment www.cedartransitway.com July 28 to August 28 Open Houses: Wednesday, July 29, 4:30-6:30 p.m. Apple Valley Transit Tuesday, August 4, 3:00 p.m. - 5:00 p.m. Cedar Grove Transit

Questions?