Central Jersey Transportation Forum. March 2007

Similar documents
Central Jersey Transportation Forum. July 20, 2006

Welcome and Introductions Overview of the Study to Date Community Involvement Intersection Improvement Concepts Bike-Ped Recommendations ITS

South King County High-Capacity Transit Corridor Study

ROUTES 55 / 42 / 676 BUS RAPID TRANSIT LOCALLY PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE

Arterial Transitway Corridors Study. Ave

Highway Transitway Corridor Study

Providence Downtown Transit Connector STAKEHOLDER MEETING #2. Stakeholder Meeting #1 October 24, 2016

A Selection Approach for BRT Parking Lots Nicolls Road Corridor Parking Study

Title. Metropolitan Council Transportation Committee December 12, Brad Larson Metro District MnDOT

1999 On-Board Sacramento Regional Transit District Survey

NJ Transit Mercer County Bus Survey

City of Davenport CitiBus Public Transportation Study. April 2015

In station areas, new pedestrian links can increase network connectivity and provide direct access to stations.

Eliminate on-street parking where it will allow for a dedicated bus only lane %

Regional Transportation Needs Within Southeastern Wisconsin

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... vii 1 STUDY OVERVIEW Study Scope Study Area Study Objectives

Purpose + Need. Connect: Thrive: Develop: < Strengthen the spine of our regional transportation system

Bus Rapid Transit ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS. Open House

Southwest Bus Rapid Transit (SW BRT) Functional Planning Study - Executive Summary January 19 LPT ATTACHMENT 2.

Alleviate Traffic Congestion and Improve Operational Reliability of the Route 17 Corridor

Chapter 5 Future Transportation

6.0 PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE FACILITIES 6.1 INTRODUCTION 6.2 BICYCLE DEMAND AND SUITABILITY Bicycle Demand

5. RUNNINGWAY GUIDELINES

Presentation of Staff Draft March 18, 2013 COUNTYWIDE TRANSIT CORRIDORS FUNCTIONAL MASTER PLAN

South Jersey certainly has many of quality of life issues related to transportation. In spite of being a small state, the Garden State has the 3 rd

Metropolitan Council Transportation Committee

WHITE PAPER: TRANSIT SERVICE FOR SOUTH SHAGANAPPI

Community Task Force March 14, 2018

Chapter 2: Standards for Access, Non-Motorized, and Transit

DVRPC CMP Strategies by Subcorridor

Montclair s Complete Streets Experience

Circulation in Elk Grove includes: Motor vehicles, including cars and trucks

PROJECT OVERVIEW. Auburn Station Access Improvements Project

Key Findings & Corridor Highlights

Executive Summary Route 30 Corridor Master Plan

Integrating Community Development and Transportation Strategies. November 13, 2014

State Road 54/56 Tampa Bay s Northern Loop. The Managed Lane Solution Linking I-75 to the Suncoast Parkway

Transportation Corridor Studies: Summary of Recommendations

Performance Criteria for 2035 Long Range Transportation Plan

Appendix A-K Public Information Centre 2 Materials

Public Comment Meeting Geary BRT Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Report

PURPOSE AND NEED SUMMARY 54% Corridor Need 1. Corridor Need 2. Corridor Need 3. Corridor Need 4. Corridor Need 5

DRAFT. Memo. Range of the Alternatives Considered in the EIS

Appendix 1 Transit Network Analysis

Vermont Rail conversion/feasibility Study

Geary Corridor Bus Rapid Transit: Staff-Recommended Alternative

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Cherry Creek Transportation and Land Use Forum September 25, 2013 Meeting Summary

Rail Station Fact Sheet University of Dallas Station

MTA Surveys: Facts and Findings. NYMTC Brown Bag March 12, 2014 Julia Seltzer, MTA Planning

Item to be Addressed Checklist Consideration YES NO N/A Required Description Complete Streets Guidelines

TRANSPORTATION & MOBILITY

Technical Working Group November 15, 2017

Lee s Summit Road Improvement Study Public Open House June 7, 2007 Summary of Comment Card Responses

SANTA CLARA COUNTYWIDE BICYCLE PLAN August 2008

Rail Station Fact Sheet DFW Airport North Station* (*station under construction with anticipated start of service in late 2018)

SNCC Demographic Trends

US 19 PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE SAFE ACCESS

Provide Employee Parking

Community Transportation Plan Acknowledgements

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION/NONMOTORIZED TRANSPORTATION

CITY OF ELK GROVE CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

City of Gainesville Transportation/Roadway Needs PROJECT SUMMARY

Evaluation of Alternatives and Final Screening Results November 20 and 21, 2013

1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROBLEM STATEMENT PROJECT PURPOSE AND NEED Study Purpose Study Need... 4

BICYCLE FACILITIES INVENTORY: SUMMARY REPORT

Appendix A-2: Screen 1 Alternatives Report

Clackamas County Comprehensive Plan

Overview: Phase 3 Draft Development and Circulation Plans, White Bear Station

M Street SW-Southeast Federal Center

Roads and Vehicular Traffic Design Principles. Roads and Vehicular Traffic Recommendations

Decision on North Waterloo Routing

CITY OF COCOA BEACH 2025 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. Section VIII Mobility Element Goals, Objectives, and Policies

section 4 Existing Conditions, Issues, and Options

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT IN SMITHS FALLS, ONTARIO; A COMPARISON BETWEEN TWO SITES

APPENDIX 2 LAKESHORE ROAD TRANSPORTATION REVIEW STUDY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

CPC Parking Lot Riverside Drive. Transportation Rationale

State Highway 16 Kuna-Mora Road to Ada/Gem County Line

Rail Station Fact Sheet CentrePort/DFW Airport Station

Countywide Transit Corridors Functional Master Plan

Regional Alternatives Analysis. Downtown Corridor Tier 2 Evaluation

Alternatives Public Workshop

Evan Johnson, Tindale Oliver & Associates. Alan Danaher, P.E., PTOE, AICP, PTP

TRANSBAY JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY

State Highway 16/McDermott Road Kuna-Mora Road to Ada/Gem County Line

Transportation, Parking & Roads

Key objectives of the survey were to gain a better understanding of:

State Highway 16 Kuna-Mora Road to Ada/Gem County Line

Chapter 7. Transportation. Transportation Road Network Plan Transit Cyclists Pedestrians Multi-Use and Equestrian Trails

Chapter 14 PARLIER RELATIONSHIP TO CITY PLANS AND POLICIES. Recommendations to Improve Pedestrian Safety in the City of Parlier (2014)

122 Avenue: 107 Street to Fort Road

Midtown Corridor Alternatives Analysis

Welcome. If you have any questions or comments on the project, please contact:

Base Information. 4. Project Contact Person, Title, Phone Number, and

SMART 1 Public Meeting #1. February 24, 2016

APPENDIX A LITERATURE REVIEW AND SUMMARY OF STAKEHOLDER INTERVIEWS

North Coast Corridor:

Sixth Line Development - Transit Facilities Plan

Guidelines for Providing Access to Public Transportation Stations APPENDIX C TRANSIT STATION ACCESS PLANNING TOOL INSTRUCTIONS

Van Ness Avenue BRT Overview and Scoping Process. Geary BRT CAC January 8, 2009

Transcription:

Central Jersey Transportation Forum March 2007

Feasibility Analysis of BRT on Dinky Right of Way from Princeton Station to Alexander Rd. in West Windsor (west of Rt. 1) Study spurred by Princeton University's on-going planning effort for a new arts district. Analysis in coordination with municipalities, Princeton University, and other public agencies. Continue Dinky service and add BRT service to Princeton and the surrounding area. Evaluate potential for: Busway parallel to the Dinky track BRT station adjacent to Princeton Station

Feasibility Analysis of BRT on Dinky Right of Way from Princeton Station to Alexander Rd. in West Windsor (west of Rt. 1) Study is a first step to identify constraints and design alternatives, including: Environmental review: lake, D&R Canal, wetlands. Historic review: buildings, structures, archeological. Design and Engineering options Coordination with potential east-west bike / pedestrian route Scheduled for completion in Spring 2007

Coordination with Princeton Junction Redevelopment Plan Coordination with NJDOT on Replacement of Rt. 1 Millstone River Bridge BRT would utilize shoulder lanes Review Connections to Development in Vicinity: Proposed Princeton Medical Center relocation to FMC site Sarnoff site development

BRT Configuration Analysis for Quaker Bridge Mall area Coordinate with expansion proposed to Lawrence Township by Simon Group Identify convenient Passenger Station location to serve existing service and future BRT Define BRT alignment through Mall property Workshop meeting convened BRT option under review by Simon Define BRT routing in Mall vicinity

Demographics Analysis Actual Income Distribution of Princeton Junction Rail Riders from Region (2005 HH Income, NJT Survey) 6% 3% 13% $150,600 Mean 11% 67% Over $100K $75 -$100 K $50 - $75K $25-$50 K < $25 K

Demographics Analysis Route 1 Corridor At-Site Workers: 2000 Household Income (Lawrence to Plainsboro) All Route 1 Workers Route 1 Workers: Drive Alone (SOV) Route 1 Workers: Transit Riders (Bus & Rail) Less Than $25,000 5% 4% 17% $25,000 - $49,999 15% 15% 25% $50,000 - $74,999 21% 21% 20% $75,000 - $99,999 19% 19% 13% $100,000 or more 40% 41% 24% Mean Income $93,344 $95,190 $70,190 Median Income $88,000 $89,500 $60,000

Demographics Analysis Income of BRT Riders Compared to Current Distribution of Transit & Auto Users 45% 40% 35% 30% 25% 20% <$50 K 15% $50 to $75 K 10% $75 to $100 K 5% $100 to $150 K 0% Current Rt. 1 Transit Auto Rt. 1 BRT Only BRT to Rail * > $150 K

Market Research Work this Spring Survey of bus passengers on NJ TRANSIT Mercer routes: 600, 603, 605, 606 Survey will establish travel patterns, transfers to other modes, time of travel Conduct focus groups to establish attribute preferences of drivers and transit riders regarding BRT characteristics

Market Research Work this Spring Conduct four focus groups with potential BRT Route 1 users: Bus Customers Existing local bus customers Auto Commuters Employees of Route 1 employers Rail Customers Princeton Junction rail riders Princeton University Students and employees of the University Identify rank order factors that are important among potential BRT users Explore all major elements of BRT

Develop Additional Ridership Estimates as Part of FY 2008 work program: Short-Term: 2010 & 2015 Update Benefit Estimates: traffic relief & travel time savings for 2010 & 2015 Evaluate short term potential for new, expanded bus services that would utilize selected alignment segments Evaluate and select alignment segments for advancement based upon ridership and benefits

Anticipated Work Items in FY 2008 Conceptual Engineering, Right of Way and Service Studies During FY 2008 (July 2007 to June 2008) Obtain current aerial photography Develop design criteria and typical plans and sections for alignment For selected segments define horizontal and vertical alignment, cross sections and rights of way Using demand forecasts (for year 2010 & 2015) and alignment information, propose locations for BRT stations and park and rides Perform bus service planning Coordinate with stakeholders, including municipalities, counties and developers to locate BRT rights of way on official maps Work to preserve alignments and station locations Maintain project website

Thank You