Global Gas Lift Optimization Using WellTracer Surveys

Similar documents
Dual Gas Lift Well Analysis Using WellTracer

Troubleshooting Unloading Gas Lift Design using DynaLift TM

32 nd Gas-Lift Workshop. Optimizing Subsea Well Kick-off Operations Case Study Using FlowLift2

37 th Gas-Lift Workshop Houston, Texas, USA February 3 7, Alan Brodie, PTC

Using Valve Performance in Gas Lift Design Software

Weatherford Inverse Gas Lift System (IGLS)

Acoustic Techniques to Monitor and Troubleshoot Gas-lift Wells

Anomaly Marker Method for Gas-Lift Wells

Continuous Injection of Hydrate Inhibitor in Gas Lift Gas to Mitigate Downtime Due to Downhole Annular Plugging

Intermittent Gas Lift Utilizing a Pilot Valve

36 th Gas-Lift Workshop. Reverse Flow Check Valve Reliability and Performance Testing of Gas Lift Barrier Check Valves

Troubleshooting Gas-lift Wells Using Dual Shot Acoustic Technique

Gas Well Deliquification Workshop Sheraton Hotel, Denver, Colorado February 20 22, 2017

Gas Lift Challenges. Gas-Lift Workshop. Qatar February 4-8, Mike Johnson ExxonMobil Production Company

Don-Nan Pump & Supply. Don-Nan Pump & Supply 1

Intermittent Gas Lift and Gas Assist Plunger Lift

Advanced Intermittent Gas Lift Utilizing a Pilot Valve

31 st Gas-Lift Workshop

Weatherford Inverse Gas Lift System (IGLS)

Two Short Topics 1) Using Compressors More Effectively 2) Improving Upon Poor-Boy Gas-Lift

Honeywell s On-line Gas Lift Optimization Solution

Acoustic Troubleshooting of Coal Bed Methane Wells

How does an unstable GLV affect the producing zones?

Gas Lift Valve Testing

Optimizing Chemical Injection

Pressure Test Tubing for Leak

Plunger Fall Velocity Model

Plunger Fall Velocity Model

Bellows Cycle Life & How Manufacturing Processes Can Impact it

Pacemaker Plunger Operations in Greater Natural Buttes

Considerations for Qualifying Elastomers Used in Artificial Lift Equipment

A Longer Lasting Flowing Gas Well

Gas-Well De-Watering Method Field Study

FLOWING GRADIENTS IN LIQUID LOADED GAS WELLS

Gas-liquid flow optimization with a Bubble Breaker device

Downhole Gas Separator Selection

Packer-Type Gas Separator with Seating Nipple

Carbon Fiber Sucker Rods versus Steel and Fiberglass

TROUBLESHOOT ROD PUMPED WELLS USING TUBING FLUID LEVEL SHOTS

Dan Casey Pro-Seal Lift Systems, Inc.

Pump Fillage Problem Overview. Jim McCoy. 9 th Annual Sucker Rod Pumping Workshop. Renaissance Hotel Oklahoma City, Oklahoma September 17-20, 2013

Setting Plunger Fall Velocity Using Venturi Plungers

Downhole Gas Separator Selection

Downhole Diverter Gas Separator

Gas-Lift Test Facility for High- Pressure and High-Temperature Gas Flow Testing

Beam Pumping to Dewater Horizontal Gas Wells

Pressure Activated Chamber Technology (PACT)

Correlating Laboratory Approaches to Foamer Product Selectione

Barrier Philosophy for Wells on Gas lift and Ways of Reducing HSE Risks. Alan Brodie Feb 2011 For more info visit

Appalachian Basin Gas Well. Marietta College, Marietta, Ohio June 7-8, Development. Robert McKee, P.E. Design Engineer Multi Products Company

Down-Hole Gas Separator Performance Simulation

Downhole Gas Separation Performance

Downhole Pressure Boosting: A production enhancement tool for both dry and liquid loaded Gas wells

Gas Locked Pumps are NOT Gas Locked!

2010 Sucker Rod Pumping Workshop Optimizing Production and Reducing Costs by Solving Rod Pumping Problems With The Beam Gas Compressor

Improving Performance of Gas Lift Compressors in Liquids-Rich Gas Service

Using Gas Lift to Unload Horizontal Gas Wells

High Pressure Continuous Gas Circulation: A solution for the

Intrinsically Safe Acoustic Instrument Used in Troubleshooting Gas Lift Wells

Dynamic IPR and Gas Flow Rate Determined for Conventional Plunger Lift Well

Presented By Dr. Youness El Fadili. February 21 th 2017

Modelling Gas Well Liquid (Un)Loading

Sucker Rod Lift Downhole Gas Separators Proposed Industry Testing

Plunger Lift Algorithms A Review

Plunger Lift: SCSSSV Applications

New Single Well Gas Lift Process Facilitates Fracture Treatment Flowback

Is The Selection Of Artificial Lift

Selection, optimization and safe operation of bypass plungers

Gas Well Deliquification Workshop. Gas Assisted Rod Pump

Ball and Sleeve Plunger System Automation Algorithm Utilizing Ball Fall Rates

A Combined Experimental & Numerical Research Program to Develop a Computer Simulator for Intermittent Gas-lift

Gas Well Deliquification Workshop. Sheraton Hotel, Denver, Colorado February 29 March 2, 2016

Hydraulic Piston Pump Field Trial

Wireless I/O, Connecting Remote Sensors in a Wide Range of Environments

Jim McCoy. Tubing Anchor Effect on Pump Fillage. Lynn Rowlan Tony Podio Ken Skinner. Gas Well Deliquification Workshop.

WellTracer. East Texas Gas Producers Association. Carthage, Texas September 21 st, 2010

De-Liquification and Revival of Oil & Gas Wells using Surface Jet Pump (SJP) Technology

New 1.5 Differential Gas Lift Valve

Plunger Lift Optimize and Troubleshoot

Challenging Subsea Gas Lift Application, Offshore Norway.

FIBRE OPTIC BASED GAS LIFT SURVEILLANCE USING DISTRIBUTED TEMPERATURE SENSING & DISTRIBUTED ACOUSTIC SENSING

Retrofit Gaslift System for TLP wells

2007 Gas-Lift Workshop

Horizontal Well Artificial Lift Simulation: Unconventional Oil & Gas Well Case Histories

SPE Copyright 2012, Society of Petroleum Engineers

Digital Intelligent Artificial Lift. Technology Application Justification Operation

Decommissioning Ageing Infrastructure: Abandoning or Re-Routing Hydrocarbon Pipelines. Dave Vernon - Director of Isolation Services

Trine Risøy, Bergen,

COGCC OPERATOR GUIDANCE MECHANICAL INTEGRITY TEST GUIDANCE: PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES

Innovating Gas-Lift for Life of Well Artificial Lift Solution. The Unconventional Solution!

Gas Lift Workshop Doha Qatar 4-88 February Gas Lift Optimisation of Long Horizontal Wells. by Juan Carlos Mantecon

10 Steps to Optimized Production

What Geologists Need to Know about Drilling

Worker Seriously Injured Servicing a Plunger Lift System

Artificial Lift Basics Pre Reading

A LIFE OF THE WELL ARTIFICIAL LIFT STRATEGY FOR UNCONVENTIONAL WELLS

PRODUCTION I (PP 414) ANALYSIS OF MAXIMUM STABLE RATE AND CHOKES RESOLVE OF OIL WELLS JOSE RODRIGUEZ CRUZADO JOHAN CHAVEZ BERNAL

Gas Lift Optimization Using Smart Gas Lift Valve

Sheet Metal Design Guidelines

2/15/06 Nora Ghobrial

Transcription:

36 th Gas-Lift Workshop Stavanger, Norway February 4 8, 2013 Global Gas Lift Optimization Using WellTracer Surveys Tony Hord, Mike Johnson ExxonMobil Production Company 2013 Gas-Lift Workshop 1

WellTracer What is WellTracer? Patented technology that traces the path of injected CO2 in a producing well Noninvasive method to determine downhole conditions well flow undisturbed How Does WellTracer Work? Requires temporary connection points on gas injection line & production line CO2 is injected in the annulus & sensed when it returns on the production line Well data including tubular design, gas lift valve setting depths, gas lift injection & production rates are input to WinGLUE software along with WellTracer data to establish lift point, possible leaks from casing to tubing, & multi-point injection What Type of Data is Collected? Where Gas Injection is entering tubing string Lift Point Whether well is Multi-point injecting If well has a tubing leak at some point other than a gas lift valve, button or mandrel 2013 Gas-Lift Workshop 2

ExxonMobil Surveys Conducted ExxonMobil s WellTracer Surveys ExxonMobil collected the first WellTracer Surveys in February 2008, since then and through December 2012, 221 surveys have been conducted, 196 total wells including 14 sets of duals (28 wells) 2013 Gas-Lift Workshop 3

Findings From Single Wells Surveyed 168 Wells Surveyed 56% of the wells were Over-Injecting GLG 52% were lifting at deepest valve 49% were Multi-Pointing 11% were lifting Shallower than optimal location 2013 Gas-Lift Workshop 4

Findings from Single Wells Surveyed 168 Single Wells Surveyed 3% (5) of the wells were designed with PPO valves 93% of the wells were designed with IPO valves 68% of the wells were designed with Orifices 6 buttons installed without mandrels 2013 Gas-Lift Workshop 5

Recommendations Made & Work Completed From Findings 177 recommendations made. 49 recommendation follow-ups completed. Types of Recommendations: Multi-Rate Testing, Reduce GLG Inj. Rate, Increase GLG Inj. Rate, GL Re-Design, Install Pack-off s, Install button orifice, Replace IPO/PPO with Orifice for single point injection 28% of Recommendations made were followed-up on 35% INCREASE in Production once Recommendation completed 2013 Gas-Lift Workshop 6

Findings from Dual Wells Surveyed 53 Dual Surveys Conducted, 28 individual wells, 14 Sets 43% of the wells were Over-Injecting GLG 29% were lifting at deepest valve 68% were Multi-Pointing 4% were lifting Shallower than optimal location 2013 Gas-Lift Workshop 7

Findings from Dual Wells Surveyed 28 Dual Wells Surveyed 50% of the Dual wells were designed with PPO valves 43% of the PPO type valves were Multi-Pointing 32% of the Wells were operating with orifice valves 2013 Gas-Lift Workshop 8

Potential BOEPD Build Up 196 Single Wells Surveyed Recommendation made & follow-up completed on 49 wells (28% of total) 35% Increase in Daily Production Recommendation made & follow-up completed on 6 Duals (21% of total) 13% Increase in Daily Production on Dual Wells Potential BOEPD BU between 13% & 35% 2013 Gas-Lift Workshop 9

High Rate GL Well - WellTracer History 2010 Redesign: Well Multi-pointing, due to high oil rate & stability, decided not to replace GL valves. Csg pressure 200 psi over design, GLG inj rate 43% higher than design. 2011 WellTracer Results: CO2 returns show 2 nd gas lift valve leaking & lifting from 5th GL valve. Appears bottom valve failed closed & never opened to remove fluid from the casing at depth. Csg pressure & GLG inj rate @ design. 2012 WellTracer Results: Multi-pointing through 3 rd,5 th & 6 th valves. Significant uplift possible if able to lift from bottom mandrel only. Estimated PI ~2.824. Run FPT, compare results with 2011 & 2012 WT Surveys (Completed). Redesign, current inj rate @ 5.024 MCFPD. Reduce GLG inj rate. 2012 GLG Re-Design: Used WinGLUE predictive on new GL design. New valves installed 11/2012. Reduced GL Injection rate by 2.328 MCFPD & achieved 552 BOEPD BU. Casing pressure currently at design rate. Well is stable. Total Transit 5 (6279 MD - Weatherford R Total Transit 4 (5697 MD - Weatherford R Total Transit 3 (5074 MD - Weatherford R Total Transit 2 (4493 MD - Weatherford R Raw CO2 Concentrations Total Transit 1 (3746 MD - Weatherford R Total Transit 6 (6902 MD - Weatherford R Concentration Vs. Time Well: [GLUE] HOOVER,HA,4,1 05-Aug-2010 12:15:13 Time (hh:mm:ss) 0.05 0:00:00 0:16:40 0:33:20 0:50:00 1:06:40 1:23:20 1:40:00 1:56:40 2:13:20 2:30:00 2:46:40 0.15 Total Transit 4 (5697 Total MD Transit 4 - (5697 MD - Weatherford R R Total Transit 1 (3746 Total MD Transit 1 - (3746 MD - Weatherford R R Total Transit 6 (6902 MD - Weatherford R Total Transit 6 (6902 MD - Weatherfor 0.20 0.25 tion Vs. Time Concentration W ell: Vs. Time Well: [GLUE] HOOVER,HA,4,1 17-May-2011 15:16:46 17-May-2011 15:16:46 Concentration (%) Concentration (%) 8/2010 5/2011 5/2012 0.10 Total Transit 3 (5074 Total MD Transit 3 - (5074 MD - Weatherford R R Total Transit 2 (4493 Total MD Transit 2 - (4493 MD - Weatherford R R GLV:3746 GLV:4493 GLV:5074 GLV:5697 GLV:6279 GLV:6902 CO2 Concentration CO2 Concentration Total Transit 5 (6279 MD - Weatherford R Total Transit 5 (6279 MD - Weatherfor 2013 Gas-Lift Workshop 10 Time (hh:mm:ss) Time (hh:mm:ss) 0.05 0.05 0:00:00 0:16:40 0:00:00 0:16:40 0:33:20 0:50:00 1:06:40 1:23:20 1:06:40 1:40:00 1:56:40 2:13:20 1:23:20 2:30:00 2:46:40 3:03:20 1:40:00 3:20:00 3:36:40 1:56:40 2:13:20 2:30:00 2 0.10 0.10 0.15 0.15 0.20 0.20 0.25 0.25 GLV:3746 GLV:4493 GLV:5074 0.30 0.30 GLV:5697 GLV:6279 GLV:6902 0.35 0.35 GLV:3746 GLV:4493 GLV:5074 GLV:5697 GLV:6279 GLV:6902

WellTracer Learnings Well Selection: High TGLR wells >2500 scf/bbl Wells could be multi-pointing or over-gassing Wells injecting at a Higher than designed gas lift rate Usually highest value problem wells Well Testing: Injection gas measurement must be accurate to minimize WellTracer analysis times Well Tests should be within same period (week) analysis is performed Set up testing equipment to actual operating conditions as possible WellTracer Survey: Locate casing fluid level before running survey, so survey time can be established Collect good quality field notes while surveys are being conducted Understand ALL system variables, both upstream and downstream of well WellTracer Survey Dual Well Recommendations: WellTracer Dual Surveys allows specific design placement of orifice valves and orifice size to initiate single point injection of dual strings simultaneously 2013 Gas-Lift Workshop 11

WellTracer Forward Globally prioritize MOST productive wells (Highest Rate/Profitability), Review top 10-15% Establish goal of ~50 to 70 WellTracer Surveys per year Create common data base for storage of collected WellTracer Survey data Optimize each well to be surveyed week before survey is to be performed Establish commitment from Operation Organization to Follow-Up on recommendations Report Out to Operation Organization, findings and recommendations in a timely manner Ensure accurate gas measurement is available, if not use clamp-on measurement device Track WellTracer Survey results and report information Globally to all Operation Organizations 2013 Gas-Lift Workshop 12

Copyright Rights to this presentation are owned by the company(ies) and/or author(s) listed on the title page. By submitting this presentation to the Gas-Lift Workshop, they grant to the Workshop, the Artificial Lift Research and Development Council (ALRDC), and the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), rights to: Display the presentation at the Workshop. Place it on the www.alrdc.com web site, with access to the site to be as directed by the Workshop Steering Committee. Place it on a CD for distribution and/or sale as directed by the Workshop Steering Committee. Other uses of this presentation are prohibited without the expressed written permission of the company(ies) and/or author(s) who own it and the Workshop Steering Committee. 2013 Gas-Lift Workshop 13

Disclaimer The following disclaimer shall be included as the last page of a Technical Presentation or Continuing Education Course. A similar disclaimer is included on the front page of the Gas-Lift Workshop Web Site. The Artificial Lift Research and Development Council and its officers and trustees, and the Gas-Lift Workshop Steering Committee members, and their supporting organizations and companies (here-inafter referred to as the Sponsoring Organizations), and the author(s) of this Technical Presentation or Continuing Education Training Course and their company(ies), provide this presentation and/or training material at the Gas-Lift Workshop "as is" without any warranty of any kind, express or implied, as to the accuracy of the information or the products or services referred to by any presenter (in so far as such warranties may be excluded under any relevant law) and these members and their companies will not be liable for unlawful actions and any losses or damage that may result from use of any presentation as a consequence of any inaccuracies in, or any omission from, the information which therein may be contained. The views, opinions, and conclusions expressed in these presentations and/or training materials are those of the author and not necessarily those of the Sponsoring Organizations. The author is solely responsible for the content of the materials. The Sponsoring Organizations cannot and do not warrant the accuracy of these documents beyond the source documents, although we do make every attempt to work from authoritative sources. The Sponsoring Organizations provide these presentations and/or training materials as a service. The Sponsoring Organizations make no representations or warranties, express or implied, with respect to the presentations and/or training materials, or any part thereof, including any warrantees of title, noninfringement of copyright or patent rights of others, merchantability, or fitness or suitability for any purpose. 2013 Gas-Lift Workshop 14

Disclaimer Exxon Mobil Corporation has numerous subsidiaries, many with names that include ExxonMobil, Exxon, Esso and Mobil. For convenience and simplicity in this presentation, the parent company and its subsidiaries may be referenced separately or collectively as "ExxonMobil." Abbreviated references describing global or regional operational organizations and global or regional business lines are also sometimes used for convenience and simplicity. Nothing in this presentation is intended to override the corporate separateness of these separate legal entities. Working relationships discussed in this paper do not necessarily represent a reporting connection, but may reflect a functional guidance, stewardship, or service relationship. 2013 Gas-Lift Workshop 15