Institutional Responsibilities Under A Federalwide Assurance

Similar documents
The Top 10 Human Research Protection Compliance Risks

Chapter 4 Institutional Review Board (IRB) Roles and Authorities

Collaborative Research

INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD (IRB) PROCEDURES

Ceded IRB Review. The project involves prisoners or other vulnerable populations that require special considerations.

Florida State University IRB Standard Operational Procedures

SOP 801: Investigator Qualifications and Responsibilities

University of Iowa External/Central IRB Reliance Process Standard Operating Procedure (SOP)

UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD CONTINUING REVIEW AND REAPPROVAL OF RESEARCH

2.0 Institutional Review Board

NONCOMPLIANCE. 1. Overview

Centralized IRB Models

Wayne State University Institutional Review Board

To assure knowledge and compliance by documenting the annual administrative review and continuing IRB review of non-exempt projects for the IRB.

OHRP Guidance on Written IRB Procedures

Issue in IRB Approvals:

UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA Institutional Review Board

CUNY HRPP Procedures: Multisite Non-Exempt Human Subjects Research

Children s Hospital of Philadelphia Committees for the Protection of Human Subjects Policies and Procedures Continuing Review of Approved Research

INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD (IRB) PROCEDURES

CONTINUING REVIEW CRITERIA FOR RENEWAL

Administrative Hold, Suspension, or Termination of IRB Approval

CONTINUING REVIEW 3/7/2016

Ceded IRB Review. The University of Arizona has standing agreements in place for the following entities regarding ceded IRB review:

Michigan State University Human Research Protection Program

Research Involving Human Subjects: AA 110.7

UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD CONTINUING REVIEW OF RESEARCH

2 Institutional Review Board

The Children s Hospital of Philadelphia Committee for the Protection of Human Subjects Policies and Procedures. Cooperative Agreements

SOP 407: PROTOCOL DEVIATIONS AND UNANTICIPATED PROBLEMS

Yale University Human Research Protection Program

SOP 903: HRPP AND NON-COMPLIANCE

CONTINUING REVIEW CRITERIA FOR RENEWAL

Human Research Protection Program Policy

CONTINUING REVIEW OF APPROVED IRB PROTOCOLS

INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD MANUAL: PURPOSE and POLICIES.

IRB COMPOSITION AND IRB MEMBER ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES

Investigator Manual. If you have questions about whether an activity requires IRB review, contact the IRB Office.

SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTION PROGRAM STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES

Institutional Review Board (IRB) Non-affiliated Member Nomination

UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD PROCEDURES FOR FULL BOARD REVIEW

the HRPP Director will prepare a draft report within three (3) workdays after the IRB meeting at which the determination occurred.

AUTHORITY AND PURPOSE

MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTION PROGRAM. Collaborative Research and Performance Sites (01-23) Approved

Reporting an Unanticipated Problem Involving Risks to Subjects or Others (UPIRTSO) to the IRB

CUNY HRPP Policy: Suspension or Termination of Human Subject Research

Lapse in IRB Approval

Review of Research by the Convened IRB

Effective Date: January 16, 2012 Policy Number: Appendix II. Revised Date: November 2, 2015 Oversight Level: Corporate

IRB Authorization Agreement Implementation Checklist and Documentation Tool

IRB Chair Responsibilities

IRB MEMBERSHIP COMPOSITION, ROLES AND RESPONSIBILIES

RESEARCH PROTECTIONS OFFICE

University of Wisconsin Colleges Administrative Policy #56 NON-COMPLIANCE IN HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH

Your Roadmap to Single IRB Review Serving as a Reviewing IRB

SMART IRB Agreement Implementation Checklist and Documentation Tool

Oklahoma State University Institutional Review Board Standard Operating Procedures

Institutional Review Board (IRB) Policies and Procedures Manual

SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH

Human Subjects in Research Review and Monitoring Form. Not applicable

To assure knowledge and compliance by documenting the continuing review procedure of approved projects for the IRB.

Office of the Vice President for Research

Harford Community College. Institutional Review Board Charter and Standard Operating Procedures

Standard Operating Policy and Procedures (SOPP) 3:

21 CFR Part 56 - Institutional Review Boards

Institutional Review Board Standard Operating Procedure. Suspension and Termination of IRB Approval

Elizabeth Witte, MFA SMART IRB Regulatory Officer Regulatory Foundations, Ethics, and Law Program, Harvard Catalyst

Independent Ethics Committees

Policies & Standard Operating Procedures

IV. Basic Procedures for Human Research Protections

POLICY NO EXEMPT RESEARCH... 4 POLICY NO DISCLOSURE OF RESEARCH LAB TEST RESULTS... 5

Guidance for IRBs, Clinical Investigators, and Sponsors IRB Continuing Review after Clinical Investigation Approval

University of Pennsylvania Institutional Review Board. Reliance Agreement Guidance: Penn as Central IRB FAQ

Tarleton State University

Institutional Review Board Policies and Procedures

Date Effective 4/21/2008 Identification

A Guide to SMART IRB s Resources for IRB and HRPP Personnel

What s New in GCP? FDA, OHRP Issue Harmonized Guidance on Transferring IRB Oversight of Clinical Studies

November 30, Efficient Startup of Multi-site Research Studies: Central IRBs and National IRB Reliance Platforms

IRB-REQUIRED INVESTIGATOR ACTIONS

Supersedes Document Dated: 7/7/11. SOP: RR 401 Version No.: 07 Version Date: 9/8/15 EXPEDITED REVIEW 1. POLICY

COMPLIANCE MONITORING

Signature Date Date First Effective: Signature Date Revision Date:

USC Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

Procedure Department: HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTIONS PROGRAM Policy Number: II.B.1

Institutional Review Board - Restriction s Impo sed

Human Research Protections Program Medical College of Wisconsin and Froedtert Memorial Lutheran Hospital

FDA > CDRH > CFR Title 21 Database Search. Registration Listing Adverse Events Advisory Committees. 21 CFR Part 56

HSPP Standard Operating Procedures

IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY Institutional Review Board. Policy on IRB Review of Protocol Deviations and Noncompliance for Non-exempt Research

Policy Number: 42 Title: Investigational Devices Date of Last Revision: 06/12/2008; 07/22/2010; 05/29/2013; 05/01/2016; 10/16/2018

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Version 1. Submission Guide and Policies

I. Introduction. Institutional Authority Under Which the IRB is Established and Empowered (45 CFR )(21 CFR (a))

Single IRB Review. Jeannie Barone Director, HRPO. Institutional Review Board

THE UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH DAKOTA -- INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD -- STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES

Initial Review. Approved By: Michele Kennett, JD, MSN, LLM Associate Vice Chancellor for Research. Table of Contents

Food and Drug Administration Center for Devices an d * 1Ya I a Radiological Health WARNING LETTE R

Children s Hospital of Philadelphia Committees for the Protection of Human Subjects Policies and Procedures. IRB Review Processes

Effective Date Revisions Date Review by the Convened Institutional Review Board

Transcription:

Institutional Responsibilities Under A Federalwide Assurance Lisa A. Rooney, JD Director Aegis Compliance & Ethics Center, LLP June 6, 2013 1

Questions There will be a q&a session at the end of the program. To submit a question, please email it to: questions@aegis-compliance.com We will do our best to address all of your questions within the allotted time. 2

Agenda Federalwide Assurance (FWA) Overview Institutional (Official) Responsibilities Under a FWA Questions? 3

What is a Federalwide Assurance (FWA)? A written document, submitted by an institution, outlining institution s commitment to Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) that it will comply with 45 CFR part 46 when the institution becomes engaged in human subjects research covered by the institution s FWA. A document that: An institution must have to receive federal support for conducting nonexempt human subjects research (NEHSR); and Common rule agencies must have to expend federal funds to an institution for conducting NEHSR. 4

When Does an Institution Become Engaged? When an institution s employees or agents obtain: Data about living individuals for research purposes through intervention or interaction; Individually identifiable private information for research purposes; or Informed consent of human subjects. When an institution receives a direct HHS award for NEHSR, even if all activities performed by employees/agents of another institution, unless an exception has been granted. 5

What Type of Research Is Covered by a FWA? Under current regulations: NEHSR that is conducted or supported by HHS; and NEHSR that is conducted or supported by non-hhs federal departments or agencies that have adopted the Common Rule and is covered by a FWA; or All NEHSR, regardless of funding source if institution checked box 4 of FWA. 6

What Type of Research Is Covered by a FWA? Under Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM): All NEHSR, regardless of funding source US institutions receiving some Federal funding from any Common Rule agency may be required to extend 45 CFR 46 to all research studies conducted at their institutions. 7

Agency for International Development 22 CFR 225 Common Rule Departments & Agencies National Science Foundation 45 CFR 690 National Aeronautics & Space Administration 14 CFR 1230 Environmental Protection Agency 40 CFR 26 Department of Agriculture 7 CFR 1c Consumer Product Safety Commission 16 CFR 1028 Department of Veterans Affairs 38 CFR 16 Department of Commerce 15 CFR 27 Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects (Common Rule 45 CFR 46, Subpart A) Department of Transportation 49 CFR 11 Department of Defense 32 CFR 219 Department of Justice 28 CFR 46 Department of Education 34 CFR 97 Department of Energy 10 CFR 745 Department of Health & Human Services 45 CFR 46, subpart A Plus subparts B, C, D Food & Drug Administration Department of Housing & Urban Development 24 CFR 60 Central Intelligence Agency Department of Homeland Security Social Security Administration

HHS Agencies Administration for Children & Families Administration for Community Living Agency for Healthcare Research & Quality Agency for Toxic Substances & Disease Centers for Disease Control & Prevention Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Food & Drug Administration Health Resources & Services Administration Indian Health Service National Institutes of Health Substance Abuse & Mental Health Services Administration 9

Institutional (Official) Responsibilities Under a FWA 10

Institutional (Official) Responsibilities Fulfill institutional obligations under 45 CFR 46 and the terms of the institutions FWA: Understand responsibilities involved in a Human Research Protection Program (HRPP); Set "tone" for culture of respect for human subjects & compliance with 45 CFR 46; Designate IRBs to review research covered by FWA; Provide training/educational opportunities for IRB members/staff/investigators, as appropriate; 11

Institutional (Official) Responsibilities cont d Provide/ensure sufficient resources, space, and staff to support the IRB's review and record keeping duties; Appoint IRB members; Suspend/terminate IRB members; Provide/ensure IRB oversight; Operates in accordance with 45 CFR 46 & Functions independently, without undue influence Sign memoranda of understandings/agreements regarding HRPP oversight and operations; Collaborating Individual Investigator Agreements; IRB Authorization Agreements, etc. 12

Institutional (Official) Responsibilities cont d Ensure institution/irb has requisite written procedures; Ensure institution receives required reports; Ensure reports are submitted to Federal agencies; Provide/ensure investigator oversight; Provide HRPP communication and guidance; Ensure Assurances in place and IRB reviews/ certifications submitted to appropriate authorities for HHS-sponsored NEHSR being conducted: By institution s own employees or agents; and At any collaborating performance sites for which the institution has agreed to accept oversight responsibility. 13

Institutional (Official) Responsibilities cont d Not approve research disapproved by IRB; Renew and update FWA, as appropriate; and Serve as knowledgeable point of contact for OHRP. 14

Institutional Responsibilities - Internal IRB Renew Update FWA Set Tone of Respect & Compliance Understand HRPP Related Responsibilities Designate IRBs to Review Research Provide IRB sufficient Resources, Space & Staff Don t Approve Research Disapproved by IRB Ensure Assurances are in Place & IRB Certifications Submitted Be Knowledgeable POC for OHRP Fulfill Obligations Under 45 CFR 46 & Terms of Institutions FWA Appoint IRB Members Suspend/Terminate IRB Members Ensure Institution & IRB Written Procedures Ensure Federal Agencies Get Reports Provide IRB Oversight Sign HRPP MOAs & Agreements Provide Investigator Oversight Provide HRPP Communication & Guidance Provide Training Opportunities for IRB Members/Staff/Investigators

Institutional Responsibilities - External IRB Renew Update FWA Set Tone of Respect & Compliance Understand HRPP Related Responsibilities Designate IRBs to Review Research Ensure IRB sufficient Resources, Space & Staff Don t Approve Research Disapproved by IRB Ensure Assurances are in Place & IRB Certifications Submitted Be Knowledgeable POC for OHRP Fulfill Obligations Under 45 CFR 46 & Terms of Institutions FWA Ensure Institution & IRB Written Procedures Ensure Institution Gets Reports Ensure Federal Agencies Get Reports Ensure IRB Oversight Sign HRPP MOAs & Agreements Ensure Investigator Oversight Provide HRPP Communication & Guidance Provide/Ensure Training Opportunities for institution s staff & Investigators, as appropriate

Institutional (Official) Responsibilities cont d Most responsibilities can be delegated to an appropriate person; some should not Responsibilities that should not be delegated: Setting tone of respect and compliance; Completing recommended IO Assurance Training; http://ohrp-ed.od.nih.gov/cbts/assurance/login.asp Ensuring IRB independence & Adequate IRB resources, space & staff. Even if delegate responsibilities, IO ultimately responsible for all noncompliance occurring at institution. 17

Institutional (Official) Responsibilities cont d Under 45 CFR 46 and terms of institution s FWA, IOs are responsible for any and all noncompliance resulting from: IOs own acts and omissions; IRB acts and omissions & Investigator acts and omissions. Why OHRP Determination Letters are Addressed to IOs; Not investigators or IRBs! Under FDA regulations, IOs are not responsible for any acts or omissions because IOs are not recognized! 18

Noncompliance Findings Associated with Institutional Official (IO) Acts or Omissions OHRP determined that an IO failed to fulfill his obligations when IO: (a) failed to promptly report to OHRP suspensions of IRB approval; (b) attended IRB meetings as investigator advocate where IO negotiated alternatives to or appealed IRB sanctions that were imposed upon investigators as a result of serious or continuing noncompliance; & (c) requested limitations on scope of investigator audits required by IRB. IO actions/inactions resulted in a new IO. 19

Noncompliance Findings Associated with IO Acts or Omissions OHRP determined that an IO failed to fulfill his obligations when IO: (a) fired an individual after the individual requested that the IRB be allowed to audit protocols associated with a external audit report reflecting unanticipated problems (UPs); (b) did not approve the IRB audit to be conducted; (c) did not have the IRB review and take action on the external audit report reflecting UPs; (d) did not report the UPs to OHRP; (e) did not support the IRB when IRB had issues with investigator associated with external audit report; (f) did not ensure IRB had adequate written procedures; (g) did not provide IRB with sufficient resources & staff; & (h) admitted he was not aware of his responsibilities. IO actions/inactions resulted in a new IO. 20

Requisite Written Procedures Magnificent 7 The institution (official) submitting the FWA ensures that IRBs reviewing research covered by the institution s FWA have established written procedures for: Conducting initial review of research; Conducting continuing review of research; Reporting IRB findings & actions to investigators & institution; Determining which projects need review more than annually; Determining which projects need verification that no material changes have occurred since prior IRB review; 21

Requisite Written Procedures Magnificent 7 Ensuring prompt reporting to the IRB of proposed changes in a research activity, and for ensuring that such changes in approved research are not initiated without IRB review and approval, except when necessary to eliminate apparent immediate hazards to the subjects; The institution (official) submitting the FWA has established written procedures for: Ensuring prompt reporting to IRB, institutional official, sponsor/funding agency & OHRP of UPs, serious or continuing noncompliance & suspension or termination of IRB approval. 22

IRB Oversight Ensure that IRBs: Required written procedures for conducting IRB business that Provide sufficient operational detail; Are compliant with the regulations & Are being followed. Review research at convened meeting, with majority of members present, including at least one nonscientific member; Capture IRB meeting minutes appropriately; Members with conflicts are not participating in review of projects in which member has a conflict; Take appropriate IRB actions; Approve research only if satisfies 45 CFR 46.111 (and applicable subpart) approval criteria; 23

IRB Oversight Ensure that IRBs: Make additional findings when required; Conduct continuing reviews at least once per year; Exempt research appropriately; Use expedited review procedures appropriately; Review and approve modifications appropriately; Utilize IRB consultants when review requires expertise beyond or in addition to IRB; Suspend or terminate IRB approval when necessary and communicating such actions; & Maintain IRB records. 24

Investigator Oversight Ensure that investigators: Knowledgeable about HHS regulations, applicable state law, institution's FWA, and institutional procedures for the protection of human subjects; Obtain IRB approval prior to conducting NEHSR: Meet protocol requirements; Obtain and document informed consent of subjects prior to their participation in research, unless waived/altered; Obtain prior IRB approval for modifications to approved research, except when necessary to eliminate apparent immediate hazards to subjects; and Submit progress & continuing review reports to IRB in accordance with IRB policies, procedures & actions. 25

Investigator Oversight Ensure that, when necessary, investigators: Provide the IRB with prompt reports of any unanticipated problems involving risks to subjects or others; Provide the IRB with prompt reports of serious or continuing noncompliance with the regulations or the requirements or determinations of the IRB; and Keep certain records as required by the HHS regulations for at least three years after completion of the study. 26

Citations Terms of the FWA, http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/assurances/assurances/filasurt.h tml OHRP Guidance on Engagement of Institutions in Human Subjects Research, http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/policy/engage08.html ANPRM, http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/fr-2011-07- 26/html/2011-18792.htm OHRP Database for Registered IORGs & IRBs, Approved FWAs, and Documents Received in Last 60 Days, http://ohrp.cit.nih.gov/search/search.aspx?styp=bsc OHRP Recent Compliance Oversight Determinations, http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/compliance/findings/index.html OHRP Guidance on Written IRB Procedures, http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/policy/irbgd107.html OHRP Guidance IRB Approval of Research with Conditions, http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/policy/conditionalapproval2010. html 27

Next Lecture: Reporting Obligations under 45 CFR Part 46 Thursday, June 13, 2013 12pmCT/1pmET 28

Questions? Lisa A. Rooney, JD 4147 Ravenswood Avenue Chicago, IL 60613 301-933-3913 (office) 202-361-7241 (cell) lrooney@aegis-compliance.com 29