Federal surveys. Belgian Daily Mobility (Beldam) Commuting (Home-to-Work) The 17th European conference on Mobility Management.

Similar documents
Satisfaction with getting to work 56% 15% 6% 6% Total distance travelled. miles per week

The Belgian experience An actual view on mobility policy towards workplaces in Flanders (Belgium)

The cycling success story of Vitoria-Gasteiz

Satisfaction with getting to work 54% 14% 6% 5% Total distance travelled. miles per week

Satisfaction with getting to work 55% 17% 8% 7% Total distance travelled. miles per week

STAFF TRAVEL SURVEY 2006 KEY FINDINGS

Attractive, Sustainable and Healthy Mobility

BIKEPLUS Public Bike Share Users Survey Results 2017

Data was analyzed by graduate student and Sustainability Office staff member Vanessa Graventine

Land Use and Cycling. Søren Underlien Jensen, Project Manager, Danish Road Directorate Niels Juels Gade 13, 1020 Copenhagen K, Denmark

Reflections on our learning: active travel, transport and inequalities

Thursday 18 th January Cambridgeshire Travel Survey Presentation to the Greater Cambridge Partnership Joint Assembly

Impact of occupational accidents in traffic. Explorative study on the distribution and the consequences of occupational accidents in traffic

Stadtentwicklung.

15% Survey on Smart Commuting. Factsheet: University of Twente. 435 out of invited employees. This is a response rate of

ACT CANADA 2016 THE ENCOURAGEMENT OF ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION AMONG EMPLOYEES FOR THEIR JOURNEYS TO WORK OCTOBER, 24TH

Concept of car reduced city center in Leipzig. Jan Rickmeyer, City of Leipzig

Konstantin Glukhenkiy Economic Affairs Officer

January Project No

WELCOME. City of Greater Sudbury. Transportation Demand Management Plan

Innovation in bikes & MaaS

Sandwell General Hospital Travel Plan 2014

Will development of SUMPs improve Mobility Management in Lithuania?'

VILNIUS SUMP. Gintarė Krušinskaitė International project manager place your logo here

Usage differences between bikes and e-bikes

BICYCLE SHARING SYSTEM: A PROPOSAL FOR SURAT CITY

Public Transport & Bicycles: Common Ground for a Successful Partnership! Caroline Cerfontaine. Velo-city. 23 June Copenhagen

How to achieve fluid traffic

Liikkumisen ohjauksen mahdollisuudet rakennustyömailla. Dutch experiences

Determining bicycle infrastructure preferences A case study of Dublin

Transportation Master Plan Advisory Task Force

Towards a Sustainable Transport Network in the West Region. Padraic O Donoghue

1.0 FOREWORD EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION CURRENT TRENDS IN TRAVEL FUTURE TRENDS IN TRAVEL...

TRANSPORTATION TOMORROW SURVEY

Sustainable Transport in Vienna

RE-CYCLING A CITY: EXAMINING THE GROWTH OF CYCLING IN DUBLIN

Monitoring and evaluation Short summary of EUCS chapter 11

Impact assessments of cycle schemes

Healthy and Environmental Friendly Transport in the City Region

Tallinn Region Sustainable Urban Mobility Plan 2035

Sint-Niklaas: Small city, smart mobility solutions

Integration of Sustainable Travel Modes

ATTACHMENT 4 - TDM Checklist. TDM Checklist Overview

By Anne-Julie Dubois, M. Urb candidate Universite de Montreal, Canada

AGENDA. Stakeholder Workshop

Mobility 2040 Results of 2 nd Survey

FAQ sheet Dutch Cycling Embassy

Measuring and growing active modes of transport in Auckland

Part I: BYPAD the method Part II: Example: Basel, Switzerland

Cabrillo College Transportation Study

BUCKS FOR BIKES COMMUTER BICYCLE INCENTIVE APPLICATION

Travel to Work Survey March % 58% 32% 9% 7% 5% 16% 20% 12% Headlines - Bristol LA Area. Main modes of travel (%)

Travel to Work Survey March % 40% 54% 10% 2% 5% 19% 6% 3% Headlines - FILTON. Main modes of travel (%)

Capital Bikeshare 2011 Member Survey Executive Summary

Cycling in the Netherlands The City and the region Utrecht

Camosun College Modal Split

SUSTAINABLE MOBILITY AND WEALTHY CITIES

92% COMMUTING IN THE METRO. Congested Roadways Mode Share. Roadway Congestion & Mode Share

UWA Commuting Survey 2013

Erfurt, April

Seoul Transportation. March Urban Transportation Division Seoul Metropolitan Government

2017 UNC Commuter Survey

ABERDEEN: CITY OF THE FUTURE

Time-activity pattern of children and elderly in Rome. Action 3.1

Transportation-Demand Management Community Presentation

NM-POLICY 1: Improve service levels, participation, and options for non-motorized transportation modes throughout the County.

CNH Industrial Mobility Management

Green Mobility. Emani Kumar. Coordinator, ICLEI Asia & Executive Director, ICLEI South Asia.

Employer Challenge Planning Manual. w W h ere. ir de ta. TALLAHASSEE - LEON COUNTY

Can PRT overcome the conflicts between public transport and cycling?

Dipl.-Ing. Thomas FISCHER Reggio Emilia, 22. October 2010

Weather and Cycling in Dublin : Perceptions and Reality

Project Name: Smart Choice for commuters - BIKE2WORK Contract N : IEE/13/585/SI Duration: 36 months

A Selection Approach for BRT Parking Lots Nicolls Road Corridor Parking Study

The Amsterdam Story. The socio-economic value of cycling and innovative planning practices in context in transition. Kees van Ommeren.

HAVE DUTCH CITIES MADE THE TRANSITION TOWARDS NON- MOTORISED TRANSPORT?

CPC Parking Lot Riverside Drive. Transportation Rationale

2. Context. Existing framework. The context. The challenge. Transport Strategy

Progetto P.A.S.T.A Physical activity through sustainable transport approaches. Incentivare il cambiamento comportamentale nella mobilità

Transportation Trends, Conditions and Issues. Regional Transportation Plan 2030

Increasing Exercise Adherence through Environmental Interventions. Chapter 8

Providing an Efficient and Multi-modal Transportation System

Sustainable Transport Solutions for Basseterre, St. Kitts - An OAS funded project (Feb 2013-Feb 2015)

Travel Planning WC & NWCD Cycling Group. Thursday 2 nd July Amanda Holden

National Bicycle and Pedestrian Documentation Project INSTRUCTIONS

BYPAD. Bicycle Policy Audit CITY OF GENT March Summary. Tim Asperges Liesbeth Reekmans. Langzaam Verkeer

Travel Behaviour Study of Commuters: Results from the 2010 Dalhousie University Sustainability Survey

THE TWO BANKS OF THE TAGUS RIVER BY INTEGRATING THE BYCICLE INTO A MULTIMODAL SYSTEM

The City. Population of BH. Population of RMBH. 2.4 million inhabitants. 5.7 million inhabitants. 6.3 million trips a day

Bicycle Count Corner of 116th Street & Broadway Manhattan, New York City

A Rapid Health Impact Assessment of the Green Travel Plan for the Eastern Health and Social Services Board May 2006

March Maidstone Integrated Transport Strategy Boxley Parish Council Briefing Note. Context. Author: Parish Clerk 2 March 2016

Camosun College Modal Split

Understanding the links between cyclists' behavior and cyclability in French cities A mobile method with real-time discourse

Soft measures affect traffic in Lund effects from two years work with a sustainable transport system in Lund

Appendix E: Bike Crash Analysis ( )

City of Szekesfehervar. Royal traditions Dominant economic role 1000 years of mobility

FEEDBACK SURVEY #2: WHO PARTICIPATED

Erasmus University Rotterdam Mobility survey 2010

Road casualties and their injuries

Transcription:

Federal surveys Belgian Daily Mobility (Beldam) Commuting (Home-to-Work)

Agenda 1. Belgian Daily Mobility vs. commuting (Home-to- Work) 2. BELDAM survey 3. Commuting (Home-to-Work) survey 4. Conclusions

Federal surveys Objectives & methodology BELDAM (Belgian Daily Mobility) All type of trips Initiative from federal government Done by researchers Sample of the population (With special focus on certain areas) Survey on paper, interview commuting (Home-to-Work) commuting (Home-to-Work) Managed and organized by the federal government All employees of a company / public service (employer with more than 100 employees) Via the employer (legal obligation, social consultation, )

Agenda 1. Belgian Daily Mobility vs. commuting (Home-to-Work) 2. BELDAM survey I. About Beldam II. Some results from Beldam 3. Commuting (Home-to-Work) survey 4. Conclusions

Beldam: history i. MOBEL (1998) ii. BELDAM Belgian Daily Mobility (2012) Similar survey evolution in time. Initiative from the federal government Sponsored by: Belgian Science Policy Office Data 2010 based on a sample of: 15.882 persons 37.680 movements

Beldam: What? All Belgian citizens from the age of 6 During a period of one year to avoid the influence of seasons Survey via phone and paper Questions to citizens about Family Individual trips

Beldam: What? 1/5 of the trips to work is indirect Commuting (Home-to-work) is only 1/3 of all trips

Agenda 1. Belgian Daily Mobility vs. commuting (Home-to-Work) 2. BELDAM survey I. About Beldam II. Some results from Beldam 3. Commuting (Home-to-Work) survey 4. Conclusions

Beldam: Modal split By car Walking Cycling Public transport Other

Beldam: Mode by distance Other Public transport Bicycle Walking By car A lot of Belgian people use their car even for small distances

Beldam: Motive for travelling Bring /pick-up a person Go to work Attend a course (school) Go shopping Visit a friend/family Hobby, sports, culture Return to home During work Going to a restaurant (lunch) Services (bank, medical) Going for a walk Other

Beldam : Time of travelling Working day & school day Holiday/weekend Working day but no school day Employee Student No student/ employee

Agenda 1. Belgian Daily Mobility vs. commuting (Home-to-Work) 2. BELDAM survey 3. Commuting (Home-to-Work) survey I. About commuting (Home-to-Work) survey II. III. General results from survey Mobility management by the employer 4. Conclusions

Home-to-Work travel: What? Survey from the Federal government Every 3 years (2005-2008-2011) Employers (Companies and public services) 1/3 of the active population

Home-to-Work travel: What? Legal obligation for companies and public services with more than: 100 employees 30 employees per site

Home-to-Work travel : What? Home Before Main After Work Survey contains questions about: Modal split Existing mobility measurements Mobility problems Potential mobility measurements

Home-to-Work travel : What? Employee Government Legal obligation Employer Mobility measures Better alternative solutions for solo car usage Sustainable Mobility

Home-to-Work travel: What? Mobility management by the government Mobility data available for all levels Federal government Local mobility management (data available on large scale). Type of information Where do people work? Where are the employees coming from? What kind of transport do the employees use? What are the potential number of bikers,..? Dangerous traffic, environment,

Agenda 1. Belgian Daily Mobility vs. commuting (Home-to-Work) 2. BELDAM survey 3. Commuting (Home-to-Work) survey I. About commuting (Home-to-Work) survey II. III. General results from survey Mobility management by the employer 4. Conclusions

General results 2011 Belgium 2011 2008 2005 Evolution 2005-2011 The use of car (solo or with family) 67,3% 65,6% 66,8% Train 9,6% 10,5% 9,5% Evolution 2005-2011 Bicycle 8,7% 8,4% 7,8% Bus, tram, subway 6,5% 6,4% 5,9% Carpool MAJOR PROBLEM: 3,5% 4,1% 4,7% Walk 2,3% 2,2% 2,4% Motorbike DANGEROUS TRAFFIC 1,4% 1,6% FOR 1,7% 2008! Group transport organized by employer 0,8% 1,0% 1,2% CYCLISTS! Bicycle Subway, tram, 2011 bus 2011 2008 2008 2005 2005 Flandres Brussels Region 13,9% 17,5% 13,1% 16,1% 12,3% 14,9%

General results 2011 Increase of irregular working hours More difficult for carpool, public transport, Time schedules 2011 2009 2005 Fixed hours 28,2% 30,6% 31,4% Flexible hours 30,0% 30,3% 28,6% Shifts 13,8% 15,5% 17,5% Irregular hours 18,5% 14,8% 16,4% Other 3,7% 4,4% 6,1% Detailed time table 5,8% 4,4% 0,0%

Agenda 1. Belgian Daily Mobility vs. commuting (Home-to-Work) 2. BELDAM survey 3. Commuting (Home-to-Work) survey I. About commuting (Home-to-Work) survey II. III. General results from survey Mobility management by the employer 4. Conclusions

Home-to-Work travel: Employer Increase of measures taken by the employer Most frequently taken measures Measures to encourage cycling 2011 2008 2005 Financial compensation for cyclists 74% 48% 42% Covered bicycle parking 42% 40% 34% Showers for cyclists 33% 28% 23% Measures to encourage public transport 2011 2008 2005 Free public transport 34% 25% 23%

Home-to-Work travel : Employer Most successful measures taken by the employer Most effective measures Taken by x % of employers Regional or local financial measures 1% Move company to place with good public transport 1% Pay for car parking place 1% Transportation organized by employer 4% Free public transport 34% Measures taken by employer reduces use of car!

Home-to-Work travel: Employer Decrease of declared mobility problems No mobility problems 2011 2008 2005 Belgium 25% 22% 20% Major problems by region Flanders Wallonia Brussels 1. Dangerous traffic for cyclists (29%) 1. Dangerous traffic for cyclists (35,8%) 1. Dangerous traffic for cyclists (59,1%) 2. Public transport not adapted to working hours 22,1%) 2. Public transport not adapted to working hours (28,2%) 2. Traffic jam (57,2%) 3. Traffic jam (20,5%) 3. Parking place (25,1%) 3. Parking place (37,9%)

Home-to-Work travel: Employer Employers plan to provide less new measures (except for cyclists) Future measures 2011 2008 2005 No new measures planned for cyclists 42,1% 45,5% 43,2% No new measures planned for carpool 61,3% 60,5% 57,3% No new measures planned for public transport & transport organized by employer 56,2% 54,7% 53,0% No other new measures planned 55,7% 54,4% 52,7%

Agenda 1. Belgian Daily Mobility vs. commuting (Home-to- Work) 2. BELDAM survey 3. Commuting (Home-to-Work) survey 4. Conclusions

Conclusions - Despite the fact that national results show that it s not obvious to move towards a more sustainable mobility, we see that mobility management pays off!! - Employers: - Provide more mobility measures - Report less mobility problems - Plan to provide less new measures

Contact Website: http://www.mobilit.belgium.be Questions: enquetewwv@mobilit.fgov.be

Thank you for your attention