NEW YORK STATE 2018 Observational Survey of Seat Belt Use

Similar documents
Alabama Observational Survey of Occupant and Child Restraint Use 2010

2014 QUICK FACTS ILLINOIS CRASH INFORMATION. Illinois Emergency Medical Services for Children February 2016 Edition

2012 QUICK FACTS ILLINOIS CRASH INFORMATION. Illinois Emergency Medical Services for Children September 2014 Edition

Minnesota Seat Belt Use Survey: June 2016 Final Report

This document is made available electronically by the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library as part of an ongoing digital archiving project.

Occ c u c pa p n a t pro r t O ec e t c i t O i n

Background: Introduction:

1998 SURVEY OF FRONT SEAT OCCUPANT RESTRAINT USE IN EIGHTEEN TEXAS CITIES. by Katie N. Womack. October 1998

Iowa Child Passenger Safety Survey 2016

MTCF. Michigan Traffic Crash Facts FACT SHEETS

MTCF. Michigan Traffic Crash Facts FACT SHEETS

Protecting our Children and Youth. The Life Saving Benefits of Child Safety Seats, Boosters, and Seat Belts

Traffic Safety Facts. State Traffic Data Data. Overview

Kolkata City Fatal Accident Study (April 2016 March 2017)

Louisiana Traffic Records Data Report 2017

Improve the livability of our streets by

HSIP Project Selection Criteria

APPENDIX A TWO-LANE RURAL ROADS ELEMENTS OF DESIGN CREST VERTICAL CURVES

CITY OF COCONUT CREEK IMPLEMENTATION GUIDELINES FOR TRAFFIC CALMING

Alberta. Traffic Collision Statistics. Office of Traffic Safety Transportation Services Division May 2017

Partners for Child Passenger Safety Fact and Trend Report October 2006

MAINE STATE LEGISLATURE

COLLISION STATISTICS May Engineering Services Box 5008, th Avenue Red Deer, AB T4N 3T4

KANSAS STRATEGIC HIGHWAY SAFETY PLAN

AAA ON THE ISSUES

This Workbook has been developed to help aid in organizing notes and references while working on the Traffic Safety Merit Badge Requirements.

Technical Report: Canadian National Survey on Child Restraint use Completed for Transport Canada, in partnership with AUTO21

ADOT Statewide Bicycle and Pedestrian Program Summary of Phase IV Activities APPENDIX B PEDESTRIAN DEMAND INDEX

Minnesota Crash Mapping Analysis Tool (MnCMAT) & Crash Data

3 ROADWAYS 3.1 CMS ROADWAY NETWORK 3.2 TRAVEL-TIME-BASED PERFORMANCE MEASURES Roadway Travel Time Measures

Mission: The mission of FARS is to make vehicle crash information accessible and useful so that traffic safety can be improved

City of Tamarac, Florida Traffic Calming Policy

NEW JERSEY LAW ENFORCEMENT LIAISON NEWSLETTER

Figure 1. Indiana fatal collisions by young driver involvement,

DANGEROUS DRIVING 2008

MONROE COUNTY NEW YORK

Referred to Committee on Transportation. SUMMARY Authorizes the use of motorized wheelchairs in bicycle lanes. (BDR )

City of Elizabeth City Neighborhood Traffic Calming Policy and Guidelines

Transportation and Health Tool

Florida Class E Knowledge Exam Road Rules Practice Questions

An Assessment of Potential Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reductions from Proposed On Street Bikeways

Monroe County Department of Transportation Vertical Curve Safety Study

THE EPIDEMIOLOGY OF TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURIES IN NEW YORK STATE

Pedestrian Accidents in Kentucky

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY And A TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS FOR A SENIOR LIVING AND APARTMENT DEVELOPMENT

Senate Amendment to Senate Bill No. 354 (BDR ) Amends: Summary: Yes Title: Yes Preamble: No Joint Sponsorship: No Digest: Yes

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY CRITERIA

MODULE 1 ROAD SAFETY QUIZ - KEYS4LIFE ONLINE

BICYCLE FACILITIES INVENTORY: SUMMARY REPORT

An Overview of Traffic Records. April 15, 2016 John Riemer

Draft Traffic Calming Policy Paper

PRELIMINARY DRAFT FIRST AMENDMENT TO VISION 2050: A REGIONAL LAND USE AND TRANSPORTATION PLAN FOR SOUTHEASTERN WISCONSIN

NY Route 5 Comprehensive Pedestrian Safety Study: A Corridor Perspective CDTC Planning Committee. January 7, 2015

2012 TOWN OF CASTLE ROCK MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT FACTS PREPARED BY THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT

The Corporation of the City of Sarnia. School Crossing Guard Warrant Policy

Retrospective Study of Juvenile Motor Vehicle Deaths

Modal Shift in the Boulder Valley 1990 to 2009

Implementing Strategies from Missouri s Blueprint for Safer Roadways Using System-wide Safety Solutions to Save Lives

Subject: Solberg Avenue / I-229 Grade Separation: Traffic Analysis

EUCLID AVENUE PARKING STUDY CITY OF SYRACUSE, ONONDAGA COUNTY, NEW YORK

Appendix F: Detailed Modeling Results

2015 State Roadeo Written Test

Parade Planning & Safety

Prevention Routière Internationale. Study design for measurment of behavioural indicators

Crosswalk event overview (Saint Paul) How to organize a crosswalk event. 1. Choose a date, time and location

SCHOOL CROSSING PROTECTION CRITERIA

DOT HS November 2009 Geospatial Analysis of Rural Motor Vehicle Traffic Fatalities

Integrated Corridor Approach to Urban Transport. O.P. Agarwal World Bank Presentation at CODATU XV Addis Ababa, 25 th October 2012

CDRT. Child Death Review Team Dallas County. Brief Report Traffic-related Child Deaths OVERVIEW

UNIT V 1. What are the traffic management measures? [N/D-13] 2. What is Transportation System Management (TSM)? [N/D-14]

2003 Virginia Department of Transportation Daily Traffic Volume Estimates. Special Locality Report 198

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Carroll County, Maryland

2002 Virginia Department of Transportation Daily Traffic Volume Estimates. Special Locality Report 209

DYING WHILE WALKING INTERROGATING MEDIA COVERAGE OF PEDESTRIAN DEATHS IN THE UNITED STATES

As Amended by Senate Committee. [As Amended by House Committee of the Whole] As Amended by House Committee. HOUSE BILL No. 2192

Chapter 6. Analysis of the framework with FARS Dataset

Development of Criteria to Identify Pedestrian High Crash Locations in Nevada. Quarterly Progress Report. Submitted to

Analyses and statistics on the frequency and the incidence of traffic accidents within Dolj County

CHAPTER 37 BICYCLES, PLAY VEHICLES, SKATEBOARDS AND IN-LINE SKATES

2002 Virginia Department of Transportation Daily Traffic Volume Estimates Including Vehicle Classification Estimates. Special Locality Report 261

Maine Highway Safety Facts 2016

Truck Climbing Lane Traffic Justification Report

Traffic Impact Study. Westlake Elementary School Westlake, Ohio. TMS Engineers, Inc. June 5, 2017

2001 Virginia Department of Transportation Daily Traffic Volumes Including Vehicle Classification Estimates where available. Jurisdiction Report 24

Mid-Hudson Valley TMA Travel Time Survey

Canadian Association of Chiefs of Police Association canadienne des chefs de police

Wildlife Ad Awareness & Attitudes Survey 2015

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Executive Summary

School Zone Traffic Control Policy

2010 Virginia Department of Transportation Daily Traffic Volume Estimates Including Vehicle Classification Estimates. Special Locality Report 172

SPRING-FORD AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT

Unit 7 Speed, Travel Time and Delay Studies

Motor Vehicle Related Fatalities 10-year Statistics for British Columbia Research and Data Unit Policy and Strategic Initiatives Branch

2005 Virginia Department of Transportation Daily Traffic Volume Estimates Including Vehicle Classification Estimates. Special Locality Report 324

Analysis of Pennsylvania Crash Statistics Data

Table of Contents. Feature Article. Prevention of Traffic Accidents involving Elderly People

STATEWIDE OBSERVATIONAL SURVEY OF SAFElY BELT AND MOTORCYCLE HELMET USE IN TEXAS Prepared By KN. Womack VJ. Pezoldt

Safe System approach A beckoning perspective for children

2012 Petaluma Traffic Safety Report Collisions Rise for 2 nd Year in a Row

Reducing Crashes at Rural Thru-STOP Controlled Intersections

Transcription:

NEW YORK STATE 2018 Observational Survey of Seat Belt New York State Governor s Traffic Safety Committee Chuck DeWeese, Assistant Commissioner Empire State Plaza Albany, New York 12228

NEW YORK STATE 2018 OBSERVATIONAL SURVEY OF SEAT BELT USE INTRODUCTION Implemented on December 1, 1984 and amended in November 2000 and again in November 2009, New York s seat belt law can be summarized as follows: Covers all front seat occupants Requires the use of safety belts by back seat passengers under 16 years of age (effective November 2000) Requires children to remain in an appropriate child restraint system until they reach the age of eight (effective November 2009). In effect, all children under the age of four must be restrained in federally-approved child seats that are securely affixed to the vehicle; children under four must also be restrained on school buses. Children ages four to seven in any seating position of a motor vehicle are required to be restrained in a child restraint system appropriate for their height and weight. Booster seats are recommended when a child weighs more than 40 pounds and is over 40 inches in height. The Governor s Traffic Safety Committee s child passenger safety program promotes keeping all children in child restraints, regardless of age, until they are 4 9 tall and weigh 100 pounds or more. Primary enforcement is allowed under New York s law and a fine of up to $50.00 is imposed for violations of the law pertaining to occupants age 16 and over. A fine of not less than $25.00 nor more than $100.00 is assessed for violations involving occupants under age 16. The only vehicles excluded from coverage under the law are emergency vehicles, taxis and liveries, and buses, with the exception of the driver. Rural mail carriers in the process of delivering the mail are also excluded. Since 1984, New York State has conducted periodic statewide observational surveys of seat belt use. With few exceptions, the statewide use rate has risen steadily each year. Based on this year s survey conducted June 4-23, 2018, New York s seat belt compliance rate remained at the 2017 level of 93%. The 2018 New York State observational survey of seat belt use was conducted using the design that was approved by NHTSA in 2012. However, in accordance with federal regulations, the 2018 survey was conducted using all new sites that were selected using the same methodology as the original sites. Adhering to the Uniform Criteria for State Observational Surveys of Seat Belt (23 CFR Part 1340), the design required that 1) the geographic coverage of the sampling frame be changed from a populationbased exclusion criterion to a fatality-based exclusion criterion, 2) the road types required for the sampling frame be identified, and 3) the precision requirement be changed from a five percent relative error to a 2.5 percentage point standard error. A brief description of the key components of the design used to conduct the 2013 2018 seat belt surveys is provided below. For a detailed description of the design, the reader is referred to the document titled Seat Belt Survey Design for New York State (revised September 2012), available from the Governor s Traffic Safety Committee. 2018 NYS Observational Survey of Seat Belt page 1

OVERVIEW OF SAMPLING PLAN Stage 1: Selection of Counties New York s survey design calls for the designation of counties as the primary sampling units with all 62 counties in New York State eligible for inclusion in the survey sample. Using data obtained from the NYS Department of Motor Vehicles Accident Information System, the average number of passenger vehicle occupant fatalities for the period 2014-2016 was computed for each of the state s 62 counties. Of these 62 counties, 37 counties accounted for 85.7% of the passenger vehicle occupant fatalities and represented the first stage of sampling. The 37 counties were then stratified into six groups according to their geographic region. Two counties were selected from each of the six regions for a sample size of 12 counties. Since New York does not have VMT data by county, the 12 sample counties were selected using passenger vehicle registrations (includes pick-ups) as the measure of size. The 12 counties selected for inclusion in the survey are listed below: NYS Average Passenger Vehicle Occupant Fatalities by Selected County Region 1 2 3 4 5 6 County Average Fatality Count (2014-2016) Queens 24 Suffolk 80 Dutchess 15 Westchester 20 Albany 10 Rensselaer 5 Broome 8 Onondaga 17 Monroe 20 Wayne 8 Erie 27 Niagara 11 Stage 2: Selection of Roadway Segments The second stage of the sampling plan was the selection of roadway segments where the observation sites would be located. Taking into account both the precision of the estimate and the survey costs associated with the sample size, it was determined that the survey should include a total of 120 sites, ten in each county. A list of road segments was created using the 2010 TIGER data developed by the U.S. Census Bureau. The road segments have been classified by the U.S. Census Bureau using the MAF/TIGER Feature Class Code (MTFCC). There are primarily three classifications: 1) Primary Roads, 2) Secondary Roads, and 3) Local Roads. 2018 NYS Observational Survey of Seat Belt...page 2

The first step in the selection process was to determine the number of road segments that would be sampled from each type of road stratum. To accomplish this, the ten roadway segments were selected for each of the 12 counties based on the statewide distribution of vehicle miles traveled (VMT). In 2010, the statewide distribution of VMT by roadway type was 33.0% for primary roads, 33.7% for secondary roads and 33.3% for local roads. As a result, for the 11 counties that had all three types of roads in the data set, three primary road segments, four secondary road segments and three local road segments were selected. For the one county that did not have any primary roadway segments in the NHTSA data file, five secondary road segments and five local road segments were selected. The second step in the process involved the selection of the 120 road segments. Using the MTFCC from the U.S. Census Bureau, the road segments within each of the 12 sample counties were classified into primary, secondary and local roads. The road segments needed for each of the three strata for each county were then randomly selected using SAS computer software. SURVEY PROCEDURES Observation Periods All seat belt and booster seat use observations were conducted during weekdays and weekends between 7 a.m. and 6 p.m. The schedule included rush hour (before 9:30 a.m. and after 3:30 p.m.) and non-rush hour observations. Data collection was conducted for exactly 45 minutes at each site. Start times were staggered to ensure that a representative number of weekday /weekend/rush hour/nonrush hour sites are included. The assignment of days and times was random; however, to minimize the amount of travel between sites, sites in close proximity were assigned as data collection clusters. Data Collection All passenger vehicles, including commercial vehicles weighing less than 10,000 pounds, are eligible for observation. Data on seat belt use are collected for drivers and right front seat passengers (including those in booster seats). The only right front seat occupants who are excluded are child passengers who are traveling in child seats with harness straps. Copies of the data collection form cover sheet and survey observation form are provided in Appendix A. Each observer was given a Site Assignment Sheet, county maps marked with the site locations, and a schedule indicating the date and time for conducting observations at each site. The direction of traffic to be observed at the site was predetermined and included on the list of assigned sites. The observers were instructed to only observe traffic on the assigned road segment traveling in the direction designated. They were also instructed on how to select an appropriate and safe location for conducting the observations and on the procedures to follow if the designated observation point is found to be inaccessible or unsafe. Since the sites are roadway segments and are not limited to intersections, observations can be conducted anywhere on the designated segment as long as the same traffic is observed. 2018 NYS Observational Survey of Seat Belt...page 3

SEAT BELT USAGE RATE AND VARIANCE ESTIMATES The results of the June 2018 survey indicate a statewide seat belt use rate of 92.93%. The standard error of the estimate is 0.40% and the lower and upper limits of the use rate are 91.95% and 93.91%, at the 95% confidence interval. The estimate was based on observations made at 120 sites within six predefined regions of the state. The data used to derive the estimate are provided in Appendix B. The rate and variance estimates were calculated using the Sudaan software package. NYS SEAT BELT USAGE RATE AND VARIANCE ESTIMATES June 2018 95% Usage Rate Standard Error Confidence Interval % % % Lower % Higher 92.93 0.40 91.95 93.91 2018 NYS Observational Survey of Seat Belt...page 4

APPENDIX A New York State Seat Belt Survey Data Collection Form Cover Sheet Institute for Traffic Safety Management and Research, State University at Albany Office phone #518-453-0291 // Janine Schultz cell #518-495-5546 // Jenifer Tanis cell #518-817-8656 Observer Date Site Identification Site Location Site # Alternate Site Information Is this an alternate site? (Circle one) No Yes If yes, please provide a reason for using an alternate site from the reserve list: Site Description Assigned traffic flow: North South East West Number of lanes observed: One Total number of lanes in this direction: Weather Conditions: (Circle one) Clear Light Fog Light Rain Site Start and End Time Start time for observation: am/pm End Time for observation: am/pm Total observation period must last exactly 45 minutes.

Site # New York State Seat Belt Survey-Observation Form Institute for Traffic Safety Management and Research, University at Albany, 518-453-0291 Key: Yes = 1 No = 0 Unknown = U No Passenger: Leave Blank Page of 1 26 51 76 101 126 2 27 52 77 102 127 3 28 53 78 103 128 4 29 54 79 104 129 5 30 55 80 105 130 6 31 56 81 106 131 7 32 57 82 107 132 8 33 58 83 108 133 9 34 59 84 109 134 10 35 60 85 110 135 11 36 61 86 111 136 12 37 62 87 112 137 13 38 63 88 113 138 14 39 64 89 114 139 15 40 65 90 115 140 16 41 66 91 116 141 17 42 67 92 117 142 18 43 68 93 118 143 19 44 69 94 119 144 20 45 70 95 120 145 21 46 71 96 121 146 22 47 72 97 122 147 23 48 73 98 123 148 24 49 74 99 124 149 25 50 75 100 125 150

APPENDIX B NEW YORK STATE 2018 OBSERVATIONAL SURVEY OF SEAT BELT USE County Number of Front Seat Occupants Belted Number of Front Seat Occupants Unbelted Total Front Seat Occupants Unweighted County Usage Rate 1 Queens 2,005 114 2,119 93.75% 2 Suffolk 2,301 201 2,502 92.28% 3 Dutchess 2,334 143 2,477 94.53% 4 Westchester 2,544 185 2,729 92.74% 5 Albany 2,339 87 2,426 97.03% 6 Rensselaer 1,389 26 1,415 95.33% 7 Broome 2,333 133 2,466 93.90% 8 Onondaga 1,912 79 1,991 94.46% 9 Monroe 1,413 64 1,477 95.22% 10 Wayne 1,041 39 1,080 96.17% 11 Erie 2,067 183 2,250 92.81% 12 Niagara 1,715 129 1,844 95.84% Weighted Statewide Usage Rate State Total 23,393 1,383 24,776 94.42% 92.93% Standard Error of Statewide Usage Rate: 0.40