Updated A before and after study of 3M Driver Feedback Signs

Similar documents
Chicane Schemes. Traffic Advisory Leaflet 12/97 December Introduction

Bramshaw traffic calming proposal

Smart motorways: all lane running on the M25. Guidance for EEAST crews

MILTON ROAD ~ MITCHAM'S CORNER PARAMICS MODEL INITIAL OPTION TESTING

CITY OF WEST LAKE HILLS. Forest View Neighborhood Traffic Calming Study

WELCOME Public Information Centre

Giles Run Connector Road

NEW YORK CENTRAL PARK SUBDIVISION BLAIS STREET/ST-PIERRE STREET EMBRUN, ONTARIO TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. Prepared for:

NRA New Divided Road Types: Type 2 and Type 3 Dual - Carriageways

Appendix A Type of Traffic Calming Measures Engineering Solutions

TRAFFIC ADVISORY LEAFLET

Edenbrook Hill Drive Traffic Calming Study

20mph Speed Limit Trial Warrington Borough Council. Mark Tune Traffic Management & Road Safety Manager

Research Into The Effectiveness Of Different Forms Of Traffic Calming In The London Borough Of Southwark

Chapter 4 Traffic Analysis

J Street and Folsom Boulevard Lane Conversion Project (T ) Before and After Traffic Evaluation

NRA New Divided Road Types: Type 2 and Type 3 Dual-carriageways

Cyclists at road narrowings

DUNBOW ROAD FUNCTIONAL PLANNING

Marcus Jones, TRL. Presented by Name Here Job Title - Date

Public Information Centre

CUERDEN TRANSPORT PROPOSALS

TERM CONTRACT FOR THE MANAGEMENT AND MAINTENANCE OF THE SCOTTISH TRUNK ROAD NETWORK NORTH EAST UNIT

ROADWAY LIGHTING Literature Summary

Glenn Avenue Corridor Traffic Operational Evaluation

Speed Limit Policy Isle of Wight Council

BLYTHEWOOD PARK, BROMLEY

Traffic Impact Study. Westlake Elementary School Westlake, Ohio. TMS Engineers, Inc. June 5, 2017

Streets for All : 9 Use of white lines

Offaly Local Authorities Traffic Calming Policy April 2016

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF LOW-COST TRAFFIC CALMING APPLICATIONS APPROPRIATE FOR MAIN STREETS THROUGH RURAL COMMUNITIES

WEST AVENUE AND NEW ROAD TRAFFIC STUDY PART III WEST AVENUE CLOSURE ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS

MEETING FACILITY 2901 GIBFORD DRIVE CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for: Holiday Inn Express 2881 Gibford Drive Ottawa, ON K1V 2L9

Speed Data Analysis. Monk Fryston Parish Council. Traffic Speed data Statistical Analysis 30th. November 2017 to 6th December 2017.

TRAFFIC ACTION PLAN. Laurie Meadows Neighborhood CITY OF SAN MATEO

Traffic Assets Section Proposed Removal of Street Lighting Road Safety Review Report No 48

Traffic Calming Regulations

Chapter 7 - Rural Roads

Vehicle-activated signs a large scale evaluation

RIVER CROSSINGS: EAST OF SILVERTOWN CROSSINGS

Traffic Impact Analysis Chatham County Grocery Chatham County, NC

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES. North Harrison Street (Lee Highway to Little Falls Road) Comparative Analysis. Prepared for:

Traffic Calming Program Update

TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS REPORT US Route 6 Huron, Erie County, Ohio

Harrah s Station Square Casino

Geometric Design Tables

Henderson Avenue Mixed-Use Development

Enclosure 1. Crimson Drive Traffic Safety and Calming Review Report

INDUSTRIAL BUILDING 3009 HAWTHORNE ROAD CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW REVISED. Prepared for: Canada Inc.

Setting Local Speed Limits. A review of recent installations of 20mph area schemes (signage only).

Traffic Circulation Study for Neighborhood Southwest of Mockingbird Lane and Airline Road, Highland Park, Texas

MEDICAL/OFFICE BUILDING 1637 BANK STREET OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW. Prepared for:

Collision Site Investigation - Bodenham By-Pass Background

Chapter 4 Route Window C3 Hyde Park and Park Lane shafts. Transport for London

Donahue Drive Corridor Traffic Operational Evaluation

Entry Treatments. Traffic Advisory Leaflet 2/94 August Introduction. Design. Vertical Deflections. Locations

REPORT. Engineering and Construction Department

INNOVATIVE INTERSECTION DESIGN

Strategic Director for Environment. Enclosures Appendix A - Option drawings. Jamie Blake- Strategic Director for Environment

COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT 2015 ROBERTSON ROAD OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for:

M6 J7 Rushall Canal: Essential Repair Work Briefing

Cuddington Traffic Calming

How to find us Woolton Hill Argyle FC.

Park Bridge and Park Road

PAEKĀKĀRIKI HILL ROAD / BEACH ROAD / SH1 INTERSECTION PROGRESS REPORT

CITY OF OTTAWA ROADWAY MODIFICATION APPROVAL UNDER DELEGATED AUTHORITY

TOWN OF PAYSON TRAFFIC CALMING MANUAL

Public Open House #2. THE CITY OF NORTH VANCOUVER CHESTERFIELD AVENUE CYCLING IMPROVEMENTS (4th - 13th STREET) JULY 2013

VRU Safety & Traffic Calming Measures in Urban & Rural Areas

M6 Junction 10 Public Consultation

URBAN QUARRY HEADQUARTERS 2717 STEVENAGE DRIVE CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW. Prepared for: Urban Quarry 4123 Belgreen Drive, Ottawa K1G 3N2

1.3.4 CHARACTERISTICS OF CLASSIFICATIONS

Road safety on motorways

INTERIM ADVICE NOTE 150/11. Temporary Traffic Management Signing: Simplification of lane change zone signing for relaxation schemes.

133 rd Street and 132 nd /Hemlock Street 132 nd Street and Foster Street MINI ROUNDABOUTS. Overland Park, Kansas

Existing Conditions. Date: April 16 th, Dan Holderness; Coralville City Engineer Scott Larson; Coralville Assistant City Engineer

VIVA RETIREMENT COMMUNITIES OAKVILLE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY

OTTAWA TRAIN YARDS PHASE 3 DEVELOPMENT CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY. Prepared for:

GEOMETRIC DESIGN OF ROUNDABOUTS AND TRAFFIC S IGNAL SIGNAL CONTROLLED

Traffic calming regulations (Scotland)

Limerick City & County Council Traffic Calming Policy for Urban Areas DRAFT

Northbound San Jose Avenue & I-280 Off-Ramp Road Diet Pilot Project

The Rower Traffic Management Scheme

SLOUGH Stage 3 Road Safety Audit of A4 London Road, M4 J5 to Sutton Lane

Draft letter to Designers and Managing Agents INTERIM ADVICE NOTE 43/02: CANTILEVER AND PORTAL GANTRY VMS

HENDERSON DEVELOPMENT 213, 217, 221, 221 ½, 223 HENDERSON AVENUE and 65 TEMPLETON STREET OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW.

Chapter V TRAFFIC CONTROLS. Tewodros N.

King Soopers #116 Thornton, Colorado

Access Location, Spacing, Turn Lanes, and Medians

PROJECT OVERVIEW. 20th Avenue Project Limits (Lincoln Way to Wawona St)

5 Transit & Traffic. Overview

RESPONSIVE ROUNDABOUTS MYTH OR REALITY

Transportation Impacts: Toronto York Spadina Subway Extension

Peer Review of Highlands Neighborhood Traffic and Pedestrian Safety Plan

APPENDIX F: TECHNICAL NOTE 22 (VICARAGE ROAD JUNCTION)

DOWNTOWN TUPELO MAIN STREET: ROAD DIET STUDY

Chelmsford City Growth Package

Research for MfS2 High Risk Collision Sites and Y Distance Visibility

Active Travel Towns Funding Scheme Project Proposal. Sligo. Sligo Local Authorities

INTERSECTION OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS AND NECESSARY RECOMMENDATIONS CIVL 440 Project

Transcription:

Updated 2006 A before and after study of 3M Driver Feedback Signs 3

Site 1 Cleves Cross, Ferryhill, County Durham Site Description Cleves Cross is on the eastern side of Ferryhill. The site is approximately 5km south of the A1(M) Junction 61 and lies close to the A688 route to Bishop Auckland. The area in which the site is located is residential, and there is a Junior & Infants School at the site. The road is single carriageway, and the speed limit at the site, prior to any works being carried out, was 40mph. Scheme Details The scheme at Cleves Cross involved the implementation of a School Safety Zone, with a 20mph speed limit, outside Cleves Cross Junior & Infants School. The work included the installation of a traffi c calming scheme consisting of one-way priority entry chicanes and speed cushions. It was anticipated that this would achieve signifi cant speed reduction immediately outside the school. The traffi c calming was installed, and new speed limits implemented, in February 2003. In addition to the new speed limits and traffi c calming, 3M Driver Feedback Signs were installed in both directions, approximately 20m in advance of each chicane. This work was carried out at the same time as the implementation of the traffi c-calming scheme. Cleves Cross, Ferry Hill 85 th percentile traffi c speeds through the site before the scheme was introduced were between 40mph and 45mph. The introduction of the scheme (including the 3M Driver Feedback Signs) had a dramatic effect on traffi c speeds, which reduced by more than 15mph at most of the traffi c count locations. In December 2005, 27 months after these initial measurements, 85 th percentile speeds were very similar to those recorded in September 2003, indicating that speed reductions previously acheived have been maintained. Speed measurements were taken at three sites. Measurements were taken by permanent Automatic Traffi c Counters, one positioned to the north of the scheme (adjacent to the southbound sign), one in the centre of the scheme (outside the school), and one to the south of the scheme (adjacent to the northbound sign). The counters were positioned approximately 110 metres apart. Southbound Carriageway of speed measurement on the southbound carriageway show the following: 85 th %ile Speeds (mph) 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Southbound Speed Measurements Entering Scheme/ Passing Sign North Site Outside School Central Site May 2002 September 2003 December 2005 Exiting Scheme South Site Southbound 85 th Percentile Speed Measurements Data Supplied by: TMS Consultancy

Site 2 Burnhope Way, Peterlee, County Durham Site Description Burnhope Way lies 800m to the west of Peterlee Town Centre, approximately mid-way between the A19 Trunk Road and the central shopping area. The area in which the site is located is residential, with several schools and sports facilities nearby. Burnhope Way is the main link to Peterlee from the west. The road is single carriageway, on a downhill gradient south-eastbound, with a 40mph speed limit. Burnhope Way, Peterlee Scheme Details The scheme at Burnhope Way involved the installation of 3M Driver Feedback Signs, in both directions, with no other associated highway works. As there was no personal injury accident record at the site, but an identifi ed speeding problem, the site was selected as one where the effectiveness of the signs as a stand alone measure could be assessed. The signs were installed in March 2003, and operate at all times. However, the signs were switched off temporarily, between 7th July and 11th August 2003, in order to evaluate whether the signs had any effect on traffi c speeds during school term time and during school holidays. Eastbound Carriageway of speed measurement on the eastbound carriageway show the following: 85 th %ile Speeds (mph) 44 43 42 41 40 39 38 37 36 35 34 33 Eastbound Speed Measurements Approaching Sign West Site Passing Sign Central Site December 2002 April 2003 January 2006 After Passing East Site Eastbound 85th Percentile Speed Measurements Data Supplied by: TMS Consultancy The signs were temporarily switched off between 7th July and 11th August 2003. During this period additional speed measurements were recorded at the central site in order to obtain a direct comparison between periods when the signs were operating and when they were switched off. The results show the following: Speeds (mph) Eastbound and Westbound 85 th %ile Speeds 44.0 43.0 42.0 41.0 40.0 39.0 38.0 Eastbound Westbound 37.0 on on on on off off off off on on Signs on/off 85 th Percentile Speed Comparison at Central Site Data Supplied by: TMS Consultancy In the eastbound direction, 85 th percentile speeds were an average of 39.9mph when the signs were operational, and increased to an average of 43.0mph when the signs were switched off. When the signs were switched back on, 85 th percentile speeds reduced to an average of 40.3mph. Westbound speeds followed a similar pattern. The t-test showed this to be statistically significant to the 0.1% level. 85 th percentile traffi c speeds through the site before the signs were installed were between 38mph and 43mph. The installation of the 3M Driver Feedback Signs initially reduced traffi c speeds close to the signs by between 1.9mph and 3.2mph, and these reductions have been maintained through the following 33 months.

Site 3 Various locations, Doncaster Scheme Description 3M Driver Feedback Signs have been installed in 10 very different locations within the Doncaster area. One is in a 20mph limit zone, another on a dual carriageway, some on semi-rural roads and others on urban roads. Before and after study results for the 3M Driver Feedback Signs sites show the following: Legerway A Intake, Doncaster Road Name/ Existing 85%ile 85%ile % Post Code Limit Before After Decrease Parkway Armthorpe (20 Zone) 36* 32 (-4) 11% DN3 3RL Alverley Lane Balby 30 38 35 (-3) 8% DN4 9AR Ruddle Lane Micklebring 30 36 34 (-2) 6% S66 7RR Station Road Hatfi eld 30 39 37 (-2) 5% DN7 6QN Warmsworth Road Balby 40 42 42 (NC) 0% DN4 ORP Armthorpe Lane Barnby Dun 30 43 38 (-5) 12% DN3 1NB Thorne Road Stainforth 30 38 36 (-2) 6% DN7 5BQ Legerway A Intake 40 47 40 (-7) 15% DN2 6HW Legerway B Intake 40 47 44 (-4) 9% DN2 7LS Park Drive Sprotbrough 30 32 30 (-2) 6% DN5 7LS Data Supplied by: Doncaster MBC The 3M Driver Feedback Signs have produced speed reductions at 9 of the 10 locations. Speed reductions of more than 10% were observed at 3 sites, at Legerway A Intake 85 th percentile speeds have reduced by 15%. Elsewhere reductions of between 5-9% were achieved with only one site remaining unchanged. * Before speed was taken when the speed limit was 30mph.

Background to the study TMS Consultancy were appointed by 3M United Kingdom plc to carry out a study of vehicle speeds before and after the installation of 3M TM Driver Feedback Signs (DFS) at two sites in Durham. The two sites are different in nature, with different speed limits, and are located at Cleves Cross, Ferryhill, Co. Durham and Burnhope Way, Peterlee, Co. Durham. Doncaster MBC also conducted independent before and after speed studies at 10 locations throughout Doncaster. The 3M Driver Feedback Sign detects the speed of an approaching vehicle and displays it in either mph or kph. It utilises a unique patented hybrid technology, which combines low energy LEDs and 3M TM Diamond Grade TM Fluorescent Refl ective Sheeting. The aim of the studies were to assess the effectiveness of the signs as a speed reducing measure, both in conjunction with other highway engineering measures and in isolation from any other improvements. The sites were then revisited approx 2.5 3 years after the 3M Driver Feedback Signs were installed to establish whether the speed reductions previously identifi ed had been maintained in the intervening period, or whether driver familiarity with the signing had lead to any subsequent increase in speeds. Conclusions The most effective site was Cleves Cross, where the speed limit was reduced from 40mph to 20mph. At this site, a considerable amount of traffi c calming (both vertical and horizontal) was introduced along with the 3M Driver Feedback Signs. In Doncaster speed reductions were achieved at 9 of the 10 sites. The most successful site being Legerway A Intake where a healthy reduction of 15% occurred. In all cases, the 3M Driver Feedback Signs seem to have contributed to speed reduction and furthermore, they appear to have a continuing effect on vehicle speeds and driver behaviour. Even in the cases where speed reductions are modest the lower speed can lead to road accident reductions. Research has shown a relationship between speed and accidents in the order of a 5% reduction in accidents for every 1mph reduction in average speed. More recently, TRL Report 548; Vehicle-activated signs a large scale evaluation identifi ed an overall reduction in accidents of 33% over a group of speed limit roundel sites, where mean speeds had been reduced by an average of 3-9mph.

3 Traffic Safety Systems 3M United Kingdom PLC 3M Centre Cain Road, Bracknell Berkshire RG12 8HT Tel: 01344 857 950 Fax: 01344 857 970 www.3m.com/uk/traffic Traffic Safety Systems 3M Ireland 3M House, Adelphi Centre Upper Georges Street Dun Laoghaire Co. Dublin, Ireland Tel: 01 280 3555 Fax: 01 280 3849