UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LIBRARIES LONG TERM TRENDS ( )

Similar documents
The impact of the American Eventing Championships on starters at regional, and national events

A Comparison of Highway Construction Costs in the Midwest and Nationally

TABLE C: STATE MANDATES AND FUNDING LEVELS

THE FUTURE OF SALES TAX REVENUE

Agricultural Weather Assessments World Agricultural Outlook Board

Agricultural Weather Assessments World Agricultural Outlook Board

Together, we are creating a world that works better.

Purpose of the Efficiency Program Industry By State and Region Appendices and Limitations of Data

AWEA State RPS Market Assessment Executive Summary

For the First Time, a Smaller Jackpot

HANDICAP ACTIVE AND INACTIVE SEASON SCHEDULE

2011 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation

TABLE 3. Level of Activity in State Financial Assurance Funds 2016

Occupant Protection Laws

Education Committee Economic Background and Issue Review

There are three major federal data sources that we evaluate in our Bicycle Friendly States ranking:

The 2019 Economic Outlook Forum The Outlook for MS

TABLES AND CHARTS 2018 UPDATE

TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY A BENCHMARKING STUDY USING PEER AND COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS PREPARED BY

AKRON, UNIVERSITY OF $16,388 $25,980 $10,447 $16,522 $14,196 $14,196 $14,196 ALABAMA, UNIVERSITY OF $9,736 $19,902 N/A N/A $14,464 $14,464 $14,464

New Sportfishing Data and Industry Trends

ECONOMIC IMP ACT REPORT 2018

Black Homicide Victimization in the Great Lakes States

CHAPTER 6. APPENDICES

State and National Economic Effects of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Related Recreation on U.S. Forest Service-Managed Lands

MUSICAL THEATRE THOMAS W. AND ROBIN W. EDWARDS COLLEGE OF HUMANITIES AND FINE ARTS FACT BOOK

Traffic Safety Facts. State Traffic Data Data. Overview

Occupant Protection Laws

Back in the Black. States Gambling Revenues Rose in Introduction Gambling revenues to states rose modestly in fiscal 2010, HIGHLIGHTS

Dartmouth College Fact Book

Historical Prevalence of Reelected Representatives in the U. S. House

Target Shooting by Hunters and Their Use of Shooting Ranges: 1975, 1991, and 2011

TABLE 3. Level of Activity in State Financial Assurance Funds 2017

Trends in Gambling Revenue to the States

Occupant Protection Laws

MEDICAID EXPENDITURES FOR LONG-TERM SERVICES AND SUPPORTS: 2011 UPDATE

2016 River Use Statistics -by Steve Sullivan

States. Postal Abbreviations LEARN THE. AND. by Joy A. Miller

More of the Same; Or now for Something Completely Different?

Wildlife Watching in the U.S.: The Economic Impacts on National and State Economies in 2011

Are Highways Crumbling? State Performance Summaries,

FOR RELEASE: TUESDAY, DECEMBER 28 AT 10 AM

Table B-8: U.S. Medical School MD-PhD Applications and Matriculants by School, In-State Status, and Sex,

Only one team or 2 percent graduated less than 40 percent compared to 16 teams or 25 percent of the men s teams.

28/5/20 Athletic Association Publicity Curt Beamer Photographic File, Box 1:

SECTION SEVEN. Characteristics of People with IDD and Staff in Large Public Residential Facilities

LOTTERY CIRCLE MANUAL

2006 Back to the Hardwood Classic IM Sports West Michigan State University Sunday, December 3, 2006

U.S. FIGURE SKATING S COLLEGIATE. Skating Programs

United States Flags. Gauge: 28 sts = 4", though gauge is not critical. Use any yarn and a needle size that gives you a fabric you like.

STUN GUN LAWS/ REQUIREMENTS DATED

For more than two decades, states saw lotteries and casinos as a bonanza of new dollars for education

2015 Survey on Lawyer Discipline Systems (S.O.L.D.)

Wildlife Watching in the U.S.: The Economic Impacts on National and State Economies in 2006

All-Time College Football Attendance (Includes all divisions and non-ncaa teams) No. Total P/G Yearly Change No. Total P/G Yearly Change Year Teams

REVISED YOUTH HUNTING REPORT

Beer Industry Update January 2019

AMERICAN SPORTFISHING ASSOCIATION SPORTFISHING. in America AN ECONOMIC ENGINE AND CONSERVATION POWERHOUSE

POLITICAL SCIENCE THOMAS W. AND ROBIN W. EDWARDS COLLEGE OF HUMANITIES AND FINE ARTS FACT BOOK

Traffic Safety Facts 2007 Data

61,634 Website Traffic: Average Monthly Page Views. 24,414 Pool and Spa News Insider Newsletter Recipients Per Issue (24 issues per year)

Occupant Protection Laws

Catena Media analysis of how we expect sports betting to roll out across the United States of America.

Lafayette Public Library Quarterly Report First Quarter. % Inc/Decr 1st qtr. 1st qtr Total Circulation 2007/08

Sears Directors' Cup Final Standings

B. Single Taxpayers (122,401 obs.) A. Married Taxpayers Filing jointly (266,272 obs.) Density Distribution. Density Distribution

28/1/10 Intercollegiate Athletics Director's Office Scrapbooks, Box 1:

Where the HSUS Spends it s Money HSUS 2006 Tax Return Analysis by Alice Fix

Weekly Peak Season Meeting

Active Transportation Funding & the Next Transportation Bill

U.S MINT STATE DUCKS SALE

Division I Sears Directors' Cup Final Standings

A Guidebook To Virginia's Historical Markers By Scott David Arnold, Virginia Dept. of Historic Resources

Indian Cowboy College Basketball Record. By Game Daily Season To Date Date Game / pick Score W / L Units $$$ Units $$$ Units $$$

Fighting Alabama s Prescription Drug Abuse Epidemic

Legislative Economic Briefing

America s Brightest ORANGE

2019 Adult Sectional Figure Skating Championships. Bid Information & Guidelines

Conduent EDI Solutions, Inc. Eligibility Gateway 270/271 Payer Guide Medicaid

Web.com Completes Acquisition of Yodle Deal strengthens Web.com s portfolio of products that help small businesses compete and succeed online

CLIFF PENNINGTON. Oakland A s 2012 Math Educational Program. 3 rd -5 th Grade Workbook

Appendix B. State Minimum Wage Standards with Exemptions for Agriculture and Citations

Economic Contribution of the 2018 Recreational Red Snapper Season in the South Atlantic

ASSOCIATION OF FISH AND WILDLIFE AGENCIES HUNTING. in America AN ECONOMIC ENGINE AND CONSERVATION POWERHOUSE

Catena Media analysis of how we expect sports betting to roll out across the United States of America.

TV & Digital Research Update

DOT HS November 2009 Geospatial Analysis of Rural Motor Vehicle Traffic Fatalities

17t h Ann u a l Re p o r t on th e ( ) POLICY STUDY

Official Match Program

Xerox EDI Eligibility Gateway 270/271 Payer Guide

Allen Publishing Company records,

CDGA 2017 CORPORATE PARTNERSHIP OVERVIEW

Gay Gilbert, Administrator Unemployment Insurance USDOL/ETA June 22, 2016

Big Changes, Unknown Impacts

Partners for Child Passenger Safety Fact and Trend Report October 2006

Israel Innovation Authority

Arizona X X X 2013

Legal Heat: 50 State Guide to Firearm Laws and Regulations

HSIS. Association of Selected Intersection Factors With Red-Light-Running Crashes. State Databases Used SUMMARY REPORT

COLLEGIATE SKATING PROGRAMS

Transcription:

UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LIBRARIES LONG TERM TRENDS (2004-2014) Based on ARL and IPEDS Statistics Prepared by Strategic Assessment Unit, ULS August 2015 1

2 Summary University of Pittsburgh data includes ULS, Law and Health Services libraries Most analyses show data for 2004-2014 or 2006-2014. Small number of analyses include data for 2012-2014 or 2014 only (to reflect new data points collected by ARL and IPEDS) Pitt data is also shown in context of selected peer and aspirational peer institutions

ARL INVESTMENT INDEX 3

4 ARL Investment Index University of Pittsburgh ARL Investment Index Rank: 2004-2014 Rank Linear (Rank) 1 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 6 11 ARL Rank 16 31 27 31 31 30 31 29 36 34 33 33 21 26 31 36

5 ARL Investment Index Ranking Peers ARL Investment Index Rank: 2004-2014 Rank 1 6 11 16 21 26 31 36 41 46 51 56 61 66 71 76 81 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 DELAWARE MARYLAND OHIO STATE PENNSYLVANIA STATE PITTSBURGH RUTGERS SUNY-BUFFALO

6 ARL Investment Index Ranking Aspirational Peers ARL Investment Index Rank: 2004-2014 1 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Rank 6 11 16 21 26 31 36 ILLINOIS URBANA MICHIGAN MINNESOTA NORTH CAROLINA PITTSBURGH VIRGINIA WISCONSIN

EXPENDITURES 7

8 Expenditures 1 Nominal Expenditures by Category: 2004-2014 $18,000,000 $16,000,000 Collections Staff Operations $14,000,000 $12,000,000 $10,000,000 $8,000,000 $6,000,000 $4,000,000 $2,000,000 $0 $11,720,010 $11,053,573 $2,890,953 $13,070,488 $11,245,436 $3,568,897 $13,637,310 $11,869,412 $3,420,490 $14,438,533 $11,988,030 $3,464,030 $14,857,024 $12,538,822 $4,264,263 $14,206,270 $12,882,043 $3,056,988 $15,605,569 $12,118,935 $3,603,279 $14,358,635 $12,320,707 $3,017,769 $14,572,377 $11,880,894 $5,347,316 $15,544,964 $12,444,350 $4,597,752 $16,617,294 $12,105,407 $3,225,859 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

9 Expenditures 2 Expenditure by Category as Percentage of Total: 2004-2014 60.00 50.00 Collections Staff Operations % of Total Expenditure 40.00 30.00 20.00 45.67 43.07 46.87 40.33 47.14 41.03 48.30 40.11 46.93 39.60 47.13 42.73 49.81 38.68 48.35 41.49 45.82 37.36 47.70 38.19 52.01 37.89 10.00 0.00 11.26 12.80 11.82 11.59 13.47 10.14 11.50 10.16 16.82 14.11 10.10 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

10 Expenditures 3 Inflation-adjusted Expenditure per Student, 2006-2014 Total Expenditure Linear (Total Expenditure) $1,000 $800 1023.5 1023.0 1015.7 970.7 966.7 880.2 930.9 938.1 912.5 $600 $400 $200 $0 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

11 Expenditures: peer comparison 1 Peers: Total Expenditure 2004-2014 $60,000,000 DELAWARE $50,000,000 MARYLAND $40,000,000 OHIO STATE $30,000,000 $20,000,000 PENNSYLVANIA STATE PITTSBURGH RUTGERS $10,000,000 SUNY-BUFFALO $0 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

12 Expenditures: aspirational peer comparison 1 Aspirational Peers: Total Expenditure 2004-2014 $70,000,000 $60,000,000 $50,000,000 $40,000,000 $30,000,000 $20,000,000 $10,000,000 ILLINOIS URBANA MICHIGAN MINNESOTA NORTH CAROLINA PITTSBURGH VIRGINIA WISCONSIN $0 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

13 Expenditures: peer comparison 2 Peers: Total Materials Expenditure 2004-2014 $25,000,000 DELAWARE MARYLAND $20,000,000 OHIO STATE $15,000,000 $10,000,000 PENNSYLVANIA STATE PITTSBURGH $5,000,000 RUTGERS $0 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 SUNY-BUFFALO

14 Expenditures: aspirational peer comparison 2 Aspirational Peers: Total Materials Expenditure 2004-2014 $30,000,000 $25,000,000 $20,000,000 $15,000,000 $10,000,000 ILLINOIS URBANA MICHIGAN MINNESOTA NORTH CAROLINA PITTSBURGH VIRGINIA WISCONSIN $5,000,000 $0 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

15 Expenditures: peer comparison 3 Peers: Professional Salaries and Wages 2004-2014 $14,000,000 DELAWARE $12,000,000 MARYLAND $10,000,000 OHIO STATE $8,000,000 $6,000,000 PENNSYLVANIA STATE PITTSBURGH $4,000,000 RUTGERS $2,000,000 SUNY-BUFFALO $0 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

16 Expenditures: aspirational peer comparison 3 Aspirational Peers: Professional Salaries and Wages 2004-2014 $16,000,000 $14,000,000 $12,000,000 $10,000,000 $8,000,000 $6,000,000 $4,000,000 $2,000,000 ILLINOIS URBANA MICHIGAN MINNESOTA NORTH CAROLINA PITTSBURGH VIRGINIA WISCONSIN $0 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

17 Expenditures: peer comparison 4 Salaries expenditure as % of total library expenditures - peer institutions 2012-2014 60.00 50.00 57.94 58.5 2012 2013 2014 40.00 30.00 20.00 59.70 50.53 50.15 48.5 49.77 48.5 47.5 39.94 45.25 45.5 43.09 42.1 39.9 40.17 37.77 40.7 37.36 38.19 37.9 10.00 0.00 RUTGERS PENNSYLVANIA STATE SUNY-BUFFALO MARYLAND DELAWARE OHIO STATE PITTSBURGH

18 Expenditures: aspirational peer comparison 4 60.0 Salaries expenditure as % of total library expenditures - aspirational peer institutions 2012-2014 2012 2013 2014 50.0 40.0 51.1 48.2 48.5 50.9 50.1 53.0 49.6 52.8 49.9 49.6 45.5 49.2 47.1 48.2 48.5 45.5 44.7 45.1 30.0 37.4 38.2 37.9 20.0 10.0 0.0 MICHIGAN WISCONSIN VIRGINIA NORTH CAROLINA ILLINOIS, URBANA MINNESOTA PITTSBURGH

COLLECTIONS 19

20 Collections 1 Pittsburgh Collections 2014* Collections Physical Digital Books 5,854,620 1,269,457 Databases N/A 540 Media 445,453 38,342 *as reported to IPEDS

21 Collections 2 10,000,000 9,000,000 8,000,000 Peers: Volumes Held 2004-2014 DELAWARE MARYLAND Volumes Held 7,000,000 6,000,000 5,000,000 4,000,000 3,000,000 2,000,000 OHIO STATE PENNSYLVANIA STATE PITTSBURGH RUTGERS 1,000,000 0 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 SUNY-BUFFALO

22 Collections 3 14,000,000 12,000,000 10,000,000 Aspirational Peers: Volumes Held 2004-2014 ILLINOIS, URBANA MICHIGAN MINNESOTA Volumes Held 8,000,000 6,000,000 4,000,000 NORTH CAROLINA PITTSBURGH 2,000,000 VIRGINIA 0 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 WISCONSIN

23 Collections 4 Peers: E-book Holdings 2012-2014 1,400,000 1,200,000 2012 2013 2014 1,000,000 800,000 600,000 400,000 200,000 0 PITTSBURGH SUNY-BUFFALO RUTGERS MARYLAND OHIO STATE DELAWARE PENNSYLVANIA STATE

24 Collections 5 Aspirational Peers: E-book Holdings 2012-2014 2,500,000 2,000,000 2012 2013 2014 1,500,000 1,000,000 500,000 0 MICHIGAN PITTSBURGH NORTH CAROLINA WISCONSIN ILLINOIS, URBANA MINNESOTA VIRGINIA

25 COLLECTIONS USE AND DELIVERY

26 Circulation 1 Pittsburgh Circulation in 2014 Physical items E-books and digital media 184,453* 1,755,724+ *excludes ILL, reserves and renewals + as reported to IPEDS

27 Circulation 2 14.00 Pitt Library Physical Circulations per Student: 2006-2014 Circulation per Student Linear (Circulation per Student) 12.00 10.00 8.00 6.00 12.82 10.49 9.94 10.14 4.00 2.00 8.28 8.29 6.92 6.26 5.27 0.00 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2014 circulation of E-books and digital media was 50.1 per student

28 Circulation 3 800,000 700,000 600,000 500,000 Peers: Initial Physical Circulations: 2004-2014 DELAWARE MARYLAND OHIO STATE Circulations 400,000 300,000 200,000 PENNSYLVANIA STATE PITTSBURGH RUTGERS 100,000 0 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 SUNY-BUFFALO % change in circulation since 2004 or earliest available data* DELAWARE MARYLAND OHIO STATE PENNSYLVANIA STATE PITTSBURGH RUTGERS SUNY- BUFFALO - 28.6-63.9-6.9-37.8-58.8-40.8-62.3

29 Circulation 4 Aspirational Peers: Initial Physical Circulations: 2004-2014 900,000 800,000 700,000 600,000 500,000 400,000 300,000 200,000 100,000 0 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 ILLINOIS, URBANA MICHIGAN MINNESOTA NORTH CAROLINA PITTSBURGH VIRGINIA WISCONSIN % change since 2004 or earliest available data* ILLINOIS, URBANA MICHIGAN MINNESOTA NORTH CAROLINA PITTSBURGH VIRGINIA WISCONSIN - 22.4-27.0-50.1-27.8-58.8-49.4-40.9

30 Inter Library Loans 1 90000 Pittsburgh ILL Lending and Borrowing: 2004-2014 80000 Number of ILL transactions 70000 60000 50000 40000 30000 20000 10000 Lending Borrowing 0 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013* 2014 *2013 data not available

31 Inter Library Loans 2 Peers: ILL Lending: 2004-2014 180,000 DELAWARE ILL Transactions 160,000 140,000 120,000 100,000 80,000 60,000 MARYLAND OHIO STATE PENNSYLVAN IA STATE PITTSBURGH 40,000 20,000 RUTGERS 0 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 SUNY- BUFFALO 2013 Pittsburgh data not available

32 Inter Library Loans 3 Aspirational Peers: ILL Lending: 2004-2013 ILL Transactions 200,000 180,000 160,000 140,000 120,000 100,000 80,000 60,000 40,000 ILLINOIS, URBANA MICHIGAN MINNESOTA NORTH CAROLINA PITTSBURGH VIRGINIA 20,000 0 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 WISCONSIN 2013 Pittsburgh data not available

33 Inter Library Loans 4 100,000 Peers: ILL Borrowing: 2004-2014 ILL Transactionsis 90,000 80,000 70,000 60,000 50,000 40,000 30,000 DELAWARE MARYLAND OHIO STATE PENNSYLVA NIA STATE PITTSBURGH 20,000 10,000 RUTGERS 0 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 SUNY- BUFFALO 2013 Pittsburgh data not available

34 Inter Library Loans 5 Aspirational Peers: ILL Borrowing: 2004-2014 ILL Transactions 100,000 90,000 80,000 70,000 60,000 50,000 40,000 30,000 20,000 ILLINOIS, URBANA MICHIGAN MINNESOTA NORTH CAROLINA PITTSBURGH VIRGINIA 10,000 0 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 WISCONSIN 2013 Pittsburgh data not available

35 Downloads 1 10,000,000 Peers: Successful Full-text Article Requests 2012-2014 9,000,000 8,000,000 2012 2013 2014 7,000,000 6,000,000 5,000,000 4,000,000 3,000,000 2,000,000 1,000,000 - PITTSBURGH MARYLAND OHIO STATE PENNSYLVANIA STATE SUNY-BUFFALO RUTGERS DELAWARE

36 Downloads 2 12,000,000 Aspirational Peers: Full-text Article Requests 2012-2014 10,000,000 2012 2013 2014 8,000,000 6,000,000 4,000,000 2,000,000 - MICHIGAN PITTSBURGH WISCONSIN NORTH CAROLINA VIRGINIA MINNESOTA ILLINOIS, URBANA

37 Downloads 3 300.0 Peers: Successful Full-text Article Requests per Patron 2012-2014 250.0 2012 2013 2014 200.0 150.0 100.0 234.1 254.4 249.9 50.0 0.0 130.7 130.3 119.2 122.6 97.2 88.6 PITTSBURGH MARYLAND SUNY-BUFFALO RUTGERS OHIO STATE PENNSYLVANIA STATE 39.8 101.2 30.3 93.4 91.0 74.9 53.1 47.3 40.9 #N/A #N/A #N/A DELAWARE

38 Downloads 4 300.0 Aspirational Peers: Successful Full-text Article Requests per Patron 2012-2014 250.0 2012 2013 2014 200.0 150.0 100.0 50.0 0.0 234.1 254.4 249.9 226.0 165.5 PITTSBURGH MICHIGAN WISCONSIN ILLINOIS, URBANA 170.2 143.5 0 63.6 91.6 101.2 VIRGINIA 39.4 0.0 MINNESOTA

39 Database searches 1 Peers: Database Searches 2012-2014 14,000,000 12,000,000 10,000,000 2012 2013 2014 8,000,000 6,000,000 4,000,000 2,000,000 - MARYLAND OHIO STATE PITTSBURGH RUTGERS SUNY-BUFFALO PENNSYLVANIA STATE DELAWARE

40 Database searches 2 Aspirational Peers: Database Searches 2012-2014 50,000,000 45,000,000 40,000,000 35,000,000 2012 2013 2014 30,000,000 25,000,000 20,000,000 15,000,000 10,000,000 5,000,000 0 ILLINOIS, URBANA WISCONSIN MICHIGAN PITTSBURGH NORTH CAROLINA VIRGINIA MINNESOTA

41 Database searches 3 Peers: Databse Searches per Patron 2012-2014 350.0 300.0 2012 2013 2014 250.0 200.0 150.0 100.0 50.0-285.0 332.6 323.7 236.0 198.5 227.7 166.0 155.2 161.3 157.1 147.2 MARYLAND PITTSBURGH SUNY-BUFFALO OHIO STATE DELAWARE RUTGERS PENNSYLVANIA STATE 137.4 71.4 75.0 73.4 34.6 45.0 96.6 37.8 40.4 #N/A

42 Database searches 4 Aspirational Peers: Database Searches per Patron 2012-2014 500.0 450.0 400.0 2012 2013 2014 350.0 300.0 250.0 200.0 150.0 100.0 50.0-286.2 489.5 509.2 265.8 328.6 287.9 WISCONSIN MICHIGAN PITTSBURGH NORTH CAROLINA 236.0 198.5 227.7 220.7 249.0 197.0 54.5 98.7 137.1 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A VIRGINIA MINNESOTA ILLINOIS, URBANA

43 INFORMATION AND INSTRUCTION SERVICES

44 Reference 1 350,000 Pittsburgh Reference Transactions, 2004-2014 300,000 250,000 PITTSBURGH Linear (PITTSBURGH) 200,000 150,000 100,000 50,000-2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

45 Reference 2 Peers: Reference Transactions: 2004-2014 Transactions 400000 350000 300000 250000 200000 150000 100000 50000 DELAWARE MARYLAND OHIO STATE PENNSYLVANIA STATE PITTSBURGH RUTGERS SUNY-BUFFALO 0 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 % change from 2004 or earliest available data* DELAWARE MARYLAND OHIO STATE* PENNSYLVANIA STATE PITTSBURGH RUTGERS SUNY-BUFFALO - 2.0-97.2-91.8-62.8-77.2-59.6-60.6

46 Reference 3 Aspirational Peers: Reference Transactions: 2004-2014 350,000 300,000 ILLINOIS, URBANA MICHIGAN Transactions 250,000 200,000 150,000 100,000 50,000 MINNESOTA NORTH CAROLINA PITTSBURGH VIRGINIA WISCONSIN - 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 % change from 2004 or earliest available data* ILLINOIS, URBANA MICHIGAN MINNESOTA NORTH CAROLINA PITTSBURGH VIRGINIA WISCONSIN - 52.2-34.5-81.6-38.8-77.2-49.7-11.0

47 Presentations 1 Peers: Presentations to Groups: 2004-2014 Presentations 3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 DELAWARE MARYLAND OHIO STATE PENNSYLVANIA STATE PITTSBURGH 1000 500 0 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 RUTGERS SUNY-BUFFALO

48 Presentations 2 Aspirational Peers: Presentations to Groups: 2004-2014 3000 2500 ILLINOIS, URBANA MICHIGAN Presentations 2000 1500 1000 MINNESOTA NORTH CAROLINA PITTSBURGH 500 VIRGINIA 0 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 WISCONSIN

49 Presentations 3 Peers: Presentation Participants: 2004-1014 Participants 90,000 85,000 80,000 75,000 70,000 65,000 60,000 55,000 50,000 45,000 40,000 35,000 30,000 25,000 20,000 15,000 10,000 5,000-2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 DELAWARE MARYLAND OHIO STATE PENNSYLVANIA STATE PITTSBURGH RUTGERS SUNY-BUFFALO % change from 2004 or earliest available data* DELAWARE MARYLAND OHIO STATE* PENNSYLVANIA STATE PITTSBURGH RUTGERS SUNY-BUFFALO 51.6-13.6 190.1 77.3-32.0 50.7 20.5

50 Presentations 4 Aspirational Peers: Presentation Participants: 2004-1014 Participants 40,000 35,000 30,000 25,000 20,000 15,000 10,000 5,000 ILLINOIS, URBANA MICHIGAN MINNESOTA NORTH CAROLINA PITTSBURGH VIRGINIA - 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 WISCONSIN % change from 2004 or earliest available data* ILLINOIS, URBANA MICHIGAN MINNESOTA NORTH CAROLINA PITTSBURGH VIRGINIA WISCONSIN 92.6 67.6-7.7 77.2-32.0 42.5 18.6

STAFF 51

52 Staff 1 Pittsburgh Staffing Levels, 2004-2014 350 300 Non-professional Staff Professional Staff 250 Number of Staff 200 150 173 167 172 174 173 171 155 144 138 138 137 100 50 118 118 120 122 120 121 118 122 118 113 110 0 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

53 Staff 2 Peers: Professional and non-professional staff 2006-2014 600 550 500 450 400 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 DELAWARE MARYLAND OHIO STATE PENNSYLVANIA STATE PITTSBURGH RUTGERS SUNY-BUFFALO

54 Staff 3 Aspirational peer institutions: Professional and nonprofessional staff 2006-2014 600 500 ILLINOIS URBANA MICHIGAN 400 300 200 100 MINNESOTA NORTH CAROLINA PITTSBURGH VIRGINIA WISCONSIN 0 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

55 Staff 4 Peer institutions: % professional staff 2006-2014 80.0 DELAWARE 70.0 60.0 50.0 MARYLAND OHIO STATE 40.0 30.0 20.0 10.0 PENNSYLVANIA STATE PITTSBURGH RUTGERS 0.0 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 SUNY-BUFFALO

56 Staff 5 Aspirational peer institutions: % professional staff 2006-2014 70.0 60.0 ILLINOIS URBANA MICHIGAN 50.0 MINNESOTA 40.0 30.0 20.0 10.0 0.0 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 NORTH CAROLINA PITTSBURGH VIRGINIA WISCONSIN