FMEA Proving Trials and Offloading Simulations

Similar documents
FMEA Proving Trials and Offloading Simulations - Lessons Learned -

OIL & GAS. MTS DP Committee. Workshop in Singapore Session 4 Day 2. Unwanted Thrust

IMCA DP Station Keeping Bulletin 03/18 August 2018

FPSO and Shuttle Tanker Positioning

WIND LOADS / MOORING & FISH TAILING. Arjen Koop, Senior Project Manager Offshore Rogier Eggers, Project Manager Ships

OFFICIAL MESSAGE CIRCULAR

Risk Management. Risk Analysis of a Dynamic Positioning Diving Vessel Up Weather of a Platform and Jack Up

Guidelines on Surveys for Dynamic Positioning System

DESIGN AND CONTROL SESSION. A General Approach for DP Weathervane Control

HiLoad, Introducing DP to Standard Tankers

A Feasible Concept of Bi-axial Controlled DP for FPSOs in Benign Environment

APPENDIX D. Assessment of Ship Impact Frequencies

OSVDPA CT-1-001, the OSVDPA Competency Standard

DP Station Keeping Event Bulletin

STATIONKEEPING DYNAMIC POSITIONING FOR YACHTS. Hans Cozijn

EVALUATING CRITERIA FOR DP VESSELS

NOBLE REV 02 FPSO MOORING SYSTEM INTEGRITY STUDY

REDUNDANT PROPULSION SHIPS RULES FOR CLASSIFICATION OF NEWBUILDINGS DET NORSKE VERITAS SPECIAL EQUIPMENT AND SYSTEMS ADDITIONAL CLASS PART 6 CHAPTER 2

Return to Session Menu DYNAMIC POSITIONING CONFERENCE QUALITY ASSURANCE SESSION. The Meaning of LIFE. Richard Purser GL Noble Denton

Maritime Training. Confidence through competence

Nautical Institute Standard for DP Knowledge for Technical Staff

DP Induction Course OBJECTIVE TARGET AUDIENCIE DURATION CONTENT ENTRY REQUIREMENT NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS

Managing Dynamic Positioning (DP) Operations

INNOVATIVE MOORING SYSTEMS

A Feasible Concept of Bi-axial Controlled DP for FPSOs in Benign Environment

BIBBY POLARIS MULTI PURPOSE DIVE SUPPORT & OFFSHORE CONSTRUCTION VESSEL

Time-domain Nonlinear Coupled Analyses Covering Typical Mooring and Riser Configurations for FPSOs

Subj: USE OF DYNAMIC POSITIONING (DP) BY OFFSHORE SUPPLY VESSELS (OSVs) FOR OIL AND HAZMAT TRANSFERS

Automatic Heading Control for Dynamic Positioning in Ice

Planning of Drilling Operations in Extreme Ocean Currents

Operability Study for DP Vessel Operations at a Deep water Spar-A Decision Support Tool

Marine Technology Society

Marine Technology Society

Note to Shipbuilders, shipowners, ship Managers and Masters. Summary

DP Ice Model Test of Arctic Drillship

Voith Water Tractor Improved Manoeuvrability and Seakeeping Behaviour

WIND TURBINE SHUTTLE HUISMAN PRODUCT BROCHURE

LNG TANDEM OFFLOADING A KEY ENABLING TECHNOLOGY TO MAKE LNG PRODUCTION OFFSHORE HAPPEN

Risk Analysis of a DP Diving Vessel Up Weather Of Platform and Jack Up.

Operations and Requirements A Practical Approach to Managing DP Operations

Rules for Classification and Construction Ship Technology

BIBBY POLARIS MULTI PURPOSE DIVE SUPPORT & OFFSHORE CONSTRUCTION VESSEL

New Offshore Scheme Frequently Asked Questions

Advanced Training for DP Operators

MARINE ACCIDENT REPORT April 2013

Challenges in estimating the vessel station-keeping performance

DP OPERATIONS GUIDANCE

Dynamic Positioning Control Augmentation for Jack-up Vessels

DYNAMIC POSITIONING SYSTEMS

FROM OPERATIONAL PROFILE TO HYBRID PROPULSION Ir. P.T. van Loon, Ir. P van Zon, Feadship, The Netherlands

DYNAMIC POSITIONING SYSTEMS

Challenges in Ship Design to Maintain Thrusters inside Ship

New Petrobras Concepts for WSOG (Well Specific Operating Guidelines)

Fault Diagnosis based on Particle Filter - with applications to marine crafts

THE BEHAVIOUR OF TUGS IN WAVES ASSISTING LNG CARRIERS DURING BERTHING ALONG OFFSHORE LNG TERMINALS

TOWAGE GUIDELINES FOR THE GLOUCESTER HARBOUR. August 2018

A STUDY OF THE LOSSES AND INTERACTIONS BETWEEN ONE OR MORE BOW THRUSTERS AND A CATAMARAN HULL

Improving Cost Efficiency of DP Operations by Enhanced Thruster Allocation Strategy

Advanced Applications in Naval Architecture Beyond the Prescriptions in Class Society Rules

ANNUAL DYNAMIC POSITIONING TRIALS FOR DYNAMICALLY POSITIONED VESSELS

MANOEUVRING BOOKLET V1.06

Maneuverability characteristics of ships with a single-cpp and their control

MTS DP Conference 2002

Planning of drilling operations in extreme ocean currents: experience from time-domain simulations and full-scale validation on Maersk Venturer

Guidance on Operational Activity Planning

DYNAMIC POSITIONING CONFERENCE October 7-8, New Applications. Dynamic Positioning for Heavy Lift Applications

Dynamic Positioning: Method for Disaster Prevention and Risk Management

Dynamic Positioning Systems

» Wind Propulsion for Cargo Ships «Performance Parameters and Operational Aspects

MANOEUVRING BOOKLET V1.06

Operations. On The Use of Safety Moorings in DP Operations

Yamal LNG Carrier Development

Root Cause Determination of Excessive Hull Vibration On a First-In-Class Tugboat Design By Wylie Moreshead, P.E., Azima DLI

IMCA DP Station Keeping Bulletin 04/18 November 2018

TASK BOOK REPORT FORM

Code Of Practice For Towage Operations In The Port of St Helier (Towage Guidelines)

applied to Port Development and Inland Waterway Transport

NAVIGATION ACCIDENTS AND THEIR CAUSES IS SHIPBOARD TECHNOLOGY A HELP OR HINDERANCE? CAPT.CLEANTHIS ORPHANOS MSc HEAD MAIC SERVICE

Number 159. Permanent underwater insert repair in Norway Fast underwater ship hull cleaning on largest container vessels in the world..

Station Keeping Capacity of a Moored Structure with Heading Control in Level Ice

Dynamically Positioned (DP) Mobile Offshore Drilling Unit (MODU) Critical Systems, Personnel and Training

Safety of DP Drilling Operations in the South China Sea

Assessment Simulation study, Phase 2. Port of Roenne. FORCE / Rev. B

Arctic Emergency Operations

Uncontrolled document if printed.

PROJECT and MASTER THESES 2016/2017

NIS/NOR Circular. Category: Circular no.: 07/2007

Four common PRESSURE CALIBRATION PAIN POINTS

ITTC Recommended Procedures and Guidelines

THE NAUTICAL INSTITUTE CERTIFICATION AND ACCREDITATION STANDARD VOL.1 - TRAINING AND CERTIFICATION

Understanding of Meteorology. for. Handling LNG at Ports

AK-APC-NTV Operating Procedures for Cargo and Passenger Non Tank Vessels Transiting and Operating in Alaska Waters December 26, 2015

SIMULATED PROPELLER WALK ON A TEU CONTAINER SHIP

ADAMS OFFSHORE SERVICES LIMITED, 5th Floor, Regent Center, Regent Road, Aberdeen, United Kingdom - AB11 5NS DPSV ADAMS AQUANAUT. DP Capability Plot

Emergency Response Plan

Offshore Service Vessels for Wind Farming. BALTEXPO 2011, September 2011

1990 Sandy Bottom Anchor Tests

Hazard Identification

Experience and Future Potential of the Oblique Icebreaker

THE HAFENSKIPPER Dock & Maneuver in the Harbor

Transcription:

FMEA Proving Trials and Offloading Simulations Lessons Learned Arjen Tjallema Bluewater Energy Services BV Douwe Stapersma Delft University of Technology

Agenda p. 2 Introduction FPSO Munin Soliton Currents FMEA Proving Trials Offloading Simulations Supporting the DP Operator Conclusion

Introduction p. 3 In 2004 similar operation at XiJiang, but: Shorter period: outside soliton season Different crew FPSO Munin replaces other FPSO Station keeping by DP only Operation will last 1.5 years

Introduction p. 4 hold-back tug pulls tanker astern shuttle tanker passively moored hawser 20-50 mt pull FPSO Munin DP station keeping 11/09/2010

Introduction p. 5 Munin operating on field as of March 2010 FPSO on DP uncommon, especially in combination with non-dp shuttle tankers Crew not experienced with these operations FPSO and crew prepared by: - FMEA Proving Trials - Offloading Simulation Training 11/09/2010

FPSO Munin

FPSO Munin p. 7 Free rotation around outrigger Outrigger with connected buoy Buoy hold-back chain 2 x production riser

FPSO Munin p. 8 11/09/2010

FPSO Munin p. 9

FPSO Munin p. 10 main diesel generators (4 x 5.5 MW) harbour diesel generator (1.1 MW) bow tunnel thrusters (2 x 2 MW) azimuthing thruster (3 MW) azimuthing thruster (3 MW) propulsion motors main propeller ( 2 x 6 MW)

Soliton Currents

Soliton Currents p. 12

Soliton Currents p. 13 Associated surface current speed: up to 3 kts Travel speed: up to 4 kts Groups of up to 20 Up to 100km wide

Soliton Currents p. 14

FMEA Proving Trials

FMEA Proving Trials p. 16 Trials contained 90 tests, divided over 8 categories: 1. Power Distribution 2. Azimuth Thrusters 3. Tunnel Thrusters 4. Propulsion Motors 5. Power Generation 6. Power Management & Control 7. DP Control System 8. Communications

FMEA Trials Lessons Learned p. 17 main diesel generators (4 x 5.5 MW) harbour diesel generator (1.1 MW) bow tunnel thrusters (2 x 2 MW) confirmed fire in engine room Half black-out test: azimuthing thruster Engine (3 room MW) shut down after confirmed fire azimuthing thruster (3 MW) Half propulsion power lost Switch to tanker mode on vessel control system alarm cannot be reset propulsion motors main propeller ( 2 x 6 MW)

FMEA Trials Lessons Learned p. 18 Crew not fully aware of logic in control systems Wrong decision can be made, as full effects are not clear Alarm flooding makes tracing of the problem difficult and time-consuming In a full black-out test the system recovered very quickly Position loss limited to 5m, however: - In a real black-out there is a cause, which has to be found - Finding the root cause can be time-consuming

FMEA Trials Lessons Learned p. 19 Monsoon conditions encountered Station keeping proved to be very good in high wind speeds, but: heading setpoint is to be chosen carefully or: head with stern into environment

Offloading Simulation Training

Offloading Simulation Training p. 21

Offloading Simulation Training p. 22

Offloading Simulation Training p. 23

Offloading Simulation Training p. 24 When a Soliton approaches, the tandem is to be rotated to head into the current

Offloading Simulation Training p. 25 In first simulations slow tandem rotation due to: - FPSO rotation not optimal - Indirect orders from mooring master - Cautious tug captain

Offloading Simulation Training p. 26 FPSO response after change of heading setpoint: 12 10 heading [deg] 8 6 4 setpoint 2 heading 0 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 time [s]

Offloading Simulation Training p. 27 heading heading [deg] 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 time [s] setpoint separate steps heading separate steps setpoint one step heading one step delivered thrust - yaw yaw moment delivered [knm] 80000 60000 40000 20000 0-20000 -40000-60000 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 time [s] separate steps one step

Offloading Simulation Training p. 28 If the FPSO s rate of turn is too high, the shuttle tanker lags behind This helps rotation of the tanker, but: If it lags too far behind, and the rotation is stopped, position of FPSO is lost! 11/09/2010

Offloading Simulation Training p. 29 hawser pull

Offloading Simulation Training p. 30 hawser pull

Offloading Simulation Training p. 31 Bow thrusters are clear indication for changed current direction When offloading, the shuttle tanker drifts when current changes direction This reduces load on bow thrusters Changing current very hard to detect for operators

Supporting the Operator

Supporting the Operator p. 33 A research project Ultimate Dynamic Positioning (UDP) is currently in progress Project investigates possibility to support DP operators with: - Condition-monitoring to detect problems in an early phase - Operator-support to assist the operator in dealing with problems Lessons learned from FMEA trials and offloading simulations valuable input for research project

Supporting the Operator p. 34 When a piece of equipment fails, it is hard for an operator to find: - What equipment failed - What is the root cause of the problem - How to solve the problem Monitoring and support systems can assist the operator with these tasks Where to put the boundaries of such systems?

Supporting the Operator p. 35 Three criteria to be used: - Sysem s functioning essential? - Can DPO take action in the system? - Is information needed to decide whether or not to continue operation? Operator support system should answer the following questions: - What will be the consequences of a problem - Can the problem be solved rapidly - How to prevent problem propagation - Can the operation safely be continued and how failure condition monitoring alarm operator support advice

Supporting the Operator p. 36 Warn operator in time after detection of problem Assist operator in solving the detected problem failure condition monitoring alarm operator support advice

Conclusion

Conclusion p. 38 Both FMEA trials and Offloading simulations have made the FPSO operate safely and efficiently Understanding the logic in a complex control system can be challenging Therefore effects of operator s actions not always clear can lead to incidents Offloading from a DP FPSO to conventional shuttle tankers requires a special operational approach, especially to change the tandem s heading Changes in current are hard to detect, measurements would be very valuable Condition monitoring and operator support will enhance operator s capabilities in case of unexpected events

Operator support p. 39 Windows was unable to detect your keyboard. Press F1 to retry of F2 to abort Solution Problem Root cause suggested detection found

p. 40 Arjen Tjallema arjen.tjallema@bluewater.com 11/09/2010