McKenzie Interchange Project Fall 2015 Engagement. Appendix 2: Engagement Materials and Feedback Form

Similar documents
Welcome to the McKenzie Interchange Project Open House!

McKenzie Interchange Project Spring 2016 Comment Period. Appendix 1: Display Boards and Feedback Form

Summary Report. Lower Lynn Improvements - Mountain Highway Interchange Public Information Sessions and Comment Period. February 21 March 11, 2017

Intersection Improvement: Sturgeon Road, Silver Avenue and Murray Park Road Roundabout. Welcome. Public Information Session

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Highway 1 Kamloops to Alberta Four-Laning Program

Current Travel Needs and Operating Conditions (See pages 4 9 of the Discussion Guide)

Southwest Bus Rapid Transit (SW BRT) Functional Planning Study - Executive Summary January 19 LPT ATTACHMENT 2.

WEST AND SOUTH WEST RING ROAD DOWNSTREAM TRAFFIC IMPACTS

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF CALEDON TRANSPORTATION NEEDS STUDY

Pattullo Bridge Replacement Project Community Connections Phase 2 Consultation. Appendix 3: Open House Display Boards

North Coast Corridor:

Governance and Priorities Committee Report For the July 2, 2015 Meeting

WELCOME TO OPEN HOUSE # 1 June 14, 2017

Terwillegar Drive Expressway Draft Concept Plan

CHIEF PEGUIS TRAIL EXTENSION WEST

5. RUNNINGWAY GUIDELINES

TRANSPORTATION NEEDS ASSESSMENT

ITEM 2.3 South of Fraser Rapid Transit Surrey-Langley technology decision. That the Mayors Council on Regional Transportation receive this report.

HIGHBURY AVENUE/HAMILTON ROAD INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS PUBLIC INFORMATION CENTRE 1 MAY 14, 2015

Bus Rapid Transit ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS. Open House

City of Hamilton s Transportation Master Plan (TMP) Public Consultation 3 December 2015

Why do we need a Gondola?

ROUTES 55 / 42 / 676 BUS RAPID TRANSIT LOCALLY PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE

Trans-Canada Highway 1 RW Bruhn Bridge Replacement

Corporate. Report COUNCIL DATE: June 26, 2006 NO: C012 COUNCIL-IN-COMMITTEE. TO: Mayor & Council DATE: June 22, 2006

Transportation Master Plan Advisory Task Force

CPC Parking Lot Riverside Drive. Transportation Rationale

University of Victoria Campus Cycling Plan Terms of Reference. 1.0 Project Description

PURPOSE AND NEED SUMMARY 54% Corridor Need 1. Corridor Need 2. Corridor Need 3. Corridor Need 4. Corridor Need 5

MASTER BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN PLAN

City of Sammamish. Welcome. Issaquah-Fall City Road Improvements Project Phase I Design: 242nd Avenue SE to Klahanie Drive SE

Welcome. Thank you for your interest in the Lewis & Clark Viaduct Concept Study

ECONOMY PEOPLE ENVIRONMENT

Operational Comparison of Transit Signal Priority Strategies

Queensboro Bridge Bus Priority Study: Summary of Recommendations. Presentation to Manhattan Community Board 8 May 4, 2011

AIRPORT ROAD ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT

Tonight is an opportunity to learn about the Study and ask questions of the Study Team members.

George Massey Tunnel Replacement Project

Washington DC Section of ITE Project Briefing

Community engagement guide May 2018

APPENDIX E Evaluation of Improvement Alternatives

Date: February 18, 2015 Page: 1 of 9. ICBC invests $1.195 million to improve Surrey, Delta & White Rock roads

Nanaimo Transportation Master Plan. Phase 1 Consultation Summary

Copenhagen Cycling Map. Red Lines Cycling facilities

4 DISRUPTION MANAGEMENT PLAN HIGHWAY 7 RAPIDWAY CONSTRUCTION BETWEEN BAYVIEW AVENUE AND WARDEN AVENUE TOWNS OF MARKHAM AND RICHMOND HILL

APPENDIX 2 LAKESHORE ROAD TRANSPORTATION REVIEW STUDY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

2014/2015 BIKE ROUTE PLAN 83 AVENUE PROTECTED BIKE LANE

Cycle Track Design Best Practices Cycle Track Sections

January Project No

Moving Cambridge. City of Cambridge Transportation Master Plan Public Consultation Centre. March 7, :00 8:00 PM.

Public Information Centre

In station areas, new pedestrian links can increase network connectivity and provide direct access to stations.

Improving Cyclist Safety at the Dundas Street West and Sterling Road Intersection

BETHEL ROAD AND SEDGWICK ROAD CORRIDOR STUDY

North Vancouver Community Associations Network. November 15, pm to 9 pm

WELCOME. Stakeholder Involvement Group Meeting #2 Round Lake Public Works October 24, 2018

Sixth Line Development - Transit Facilities Plan

Baseline Road Rapid Transit: Bayshore Station to Prince of Wales Drive

Active Transportation Infrastructure Investment A Business Case

Providence Downtown Transit Connector STAKEHOLDER MEETING #2. Stakeholder Meeting #1 October 24, 2016

Access Management Regulations and Standards

PROJECT FACT SHEET March 21, 2018

Public Consultation Centre For. Transportation Master Plan Update. Information Package

Pre-Plan Consultation Summary

Proposed Bridge Street East Bicycle Lanes Public Open House Thursday, April 27, 2017

Decision on North Waterloo Routing

PROJECT FACT SHEET May 25, 2018

Executive Summary BEYOND THE B-LINE: RAPID TRANSIT LINE PHASE II - COMMERCIAL DRIVE WEST. Final Draft December 13, Appendix B BROADWAY/LOUGHEED

Durham Region Long Term Transit Strategy

Light Rail Transit in North Central Calgary Open House and Workshop Summary. Summer 2013

INNOVATIVE INTERSECTION DESIGN

WDA response to O'Brien summary of recommendations dated 4 September 2017

Standing Committee on Policy and Strategic Priorities. Potential Granville Bridge Connector Public Engagement

DON MILLS-EGLINTON Mobility Hub Profile

1. Operate along freeways, either in regular traffic lanes, in high-occupancy vehicle (HOV) lanes, or along the shoulders.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... vii 1 STUDY OVERVIEW Study Scope Study Area Study Objectives

Access Management Regulations and Standards

CITY OF SASKATOON COUNCIL POLICY

WHITE PAPER: TRANSIT SERVICE FOR SOUTH SHAGANAPPI

Wyldewood Estates. Pre-Application Public Engagement Summary of Issues and Responses

WELCOME! Please complete a comment sheet as we value your feedback. 4 pm to 8 pm. September 15, Hosted by: AECOM on behalf of City of Calgary

NEWMARKET CENTRE Mobility Hub Profile

Port Mann/Highway 1 Improvements

ICBC invests $1.175 million to help make Surrey, Delta and White Rock s roads safer in 2013

102 Avenue Corridor Review

Project Goals and Objectives

Major Bike Routes 102 Avenue Workshop April 21, 2015

Classification Criteria

Tonight is for you. Learn everything you can. Share all your ideas.

State Road 54/56 Tampa Bay s Northern Loop. The Managed Lane Solution Linking I-75 to the Suncoast Parkway

STONY PLAIN ROAD STREETSCAPE

Downey Road. Transportation Improvement Study

Telegraph Avenue Complete Streets DRAFT Recommendations. Oakland Public Works Department September 11 and 13, 2014 Open Houses

WELCOME PTH 59N - PTH 101 INTERCHANGE FUNCTIONAL DESIGN STUDY PUBLIC INFORMATION SESSION MONDAY, JUNE 13, :00 P.M. - 8:00 P.M.

NORTH TURNAROUND. Recommended Design: Expand the existing transit terminal

3 TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL TIMING AND SYNCHRONIZATION

BUS RAPID TRANSIT. A Canadian Perspective. McCormick Rankin International. John Bonsall P.Eng

DON MILLS-SHEPPARD Mobility Hub Profile

Traffic Calming Policy

Transcription:

Fall 2015 Engagement Appendix 2: Engagement Materials and Feedback Form

Welcome to the McKenzie Interchange Project Open House! Purpose of Open House To provide you with information regarding the project and for you to have the opportunity to share your input on design concepts. We Want to Hear From You Provide us with your feedback by: Completing a feedback form and leaving it with our team Filling out the online feedback form at engage.gov.bc.ca/ mckenzieinterchange by December 11, 2015 Sending an email to mckenzieinterchange@gov.bc.ca by December 11, 2015 There will be another opportunity for you to provide feedback regarding the McKenzie Interchange Project in spring 2016. Congestion on the Trans-Canada Highway The Province of B.C. and the Government of Canada are investing $85 million in the McKenzie Interchange Project, a new interchange on the Trans-Canada Highway (TCH) at the intersection with Admirals Road and McKenzie Avenue in Saanich.

Why is the Project Needed? Safety ICBC collision data from 2006 to 2010 shows that 302 collisions were reported at the McKenzie intersection Rear-end collisions make up 75% of all crashes and are typical of intersections with stop-start congestion The intersection has a collision rate almost three times the provincial average Pedestrians and cyclists at risk Congestion The number one bottleneck on Vancouver Island Rush hour is continuing to grow Long queues of traffic on municipal roads, as well as the TCH Reliability Unpredictable travel times affect commuters and transit users Unreliable travel times affects transit service levels and operating costs A cyclist crossing at McKenzie Avenue during a congestion period For these reasons, the McKenzie Interchange Project was identified as a priority in B.C. on the Move, the Province of B.C. s ten-year transportation plan.

Current Traffic Volumes West of the McKenzie intersection, the TCH carries an average of 80,000 vehicles per day Traffic volumes at the TCH McKenzie/Admirals intersection far exceed capacity Only 49% of morning peak traffic goes through to Tillicum Only 41% of afternoon peak traffic originates east of Tillicum Large turning movements and conflicts at TCH/McKenzie intersection Inbound traffic destinations Outbound traffic destinations

Project Benefits The McKenzie Interchange Project will improve traffic flow of passenger, transit and commercial vehicles and reduce collisions and congestion-related impacts to the economy and the environment. Project benefits include: Substantial travel time savings Improved transit facilities, including bus-on-shoulder lanes Improved reliability Reductions in frequency and severity of crashes Reductions in idling and fuel consumption, leading to significantly lower greenhouse gas emissions Improved cycling and pedestrian safety, by separating the Galloping Goose Trail from McKenzie Avenue The project will reduce idling and lower greenhouse gas emissions

Project Considerations What does the Project need to consider? Parks and green spaces s and athletic fields Existing communities and access to these areas Impacts to neighbouring communities Pedestrian and cycling facilities Adjacent property owners Environmentally-sensitive areas including Colquitz Creek and Portage Inlet Ecole Marigold Spectrum Community St. Joseph's Elementary We Want to Hear From You Are there other considerations you think we should be aware of? 0 250 500 1,000 1,500 Metres

Interchange Design Options The Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure has thoroughly assessed a wide range of interchange options, including partial interchange options which were considered in the mid-1990s. Three options were determined to meet the key drivers behind this project: increasing safety, reducing congestion and improving reliability. All three of the design options have different considerations, as described on the following three boards. The project team is interested in your feedback regarding the three options, including whether there are additional considerations that you would like the project team to be aware of prior to finalizing a design option. Option 1: Diamond interchange with TCH UNDER McKenzie/Admirals Option 2: Partial cloverleaf with TCH UNDER McKenzie/Admirals Option 3: Diamond interchange with TCH OVER McKenzie/Admirals

Option 1: Diamond Interchange With TCH Under McKenzie/Admirals In this option, McKenzie and Admirals stay at their existing elevation and the highway is lowered to pass underneath. Considerations Ecole Marigold Spectrum Community Property Boundary St. Joseph's Elementary Park Boundary Approximate Construction Boundary Lowering highway reduces noise and visual impacts Smallest footprint: minimizes impacts to private properties, schools and Cuthbert Holmes Park Least costly option Left turning traffic from TCH onto McKenzie Avenue still makes left turn at a traffic signal Shortest construction period

Option 1: Diamond Interchange With Trans-Canada Highway Under McKenzie/Admirals

McKenzie Interchange Project Option 2: Partial Cloverleaf With TCH Under McKenzie/Admirals Similar to Option 1, in this option, McKenzie and Admirals stay at their existing elevation and the highway is lowered to pass underneath. Considerations Lowering highway reduces noise and visual impacts Ecole Marigold Spectrum Community St. Joseph's Elementary Largest footprint: greater impact into Cuthbert Holmes Park due to partial cloverleaf design Property Boundary Second most affordable option Park Boundary Approximate Construction Boundary Eastbound TCH loop means one less traffic signal for left turners onto McKenzie Avenue Poor soils under loop will require preload longer construction period More difficult to manage traffic during construction

Option 2: Partial Cloverleaf With Trans-Canada Highway Under McKenzie/Admirals

Option 3: Diamond Interchange With TCH Over McKenzie/Admirals In this option, McKenzie and Admirals stay at their existing elevation and the highway is elevated to pass above. Considerations Ecole Marigold Spectrum Community Property Boundary St. Joseph's Elementary Park Boundary Approximate Construction Boundary Elevated TCH increases noise and visual impacts Higher fills increase project footprint Greater impact on Portage Road may require additional property Highest cost option Left turning traffic from TCH onto McKenzie Avenue still makes left turn at a traffic signal Longest construction period due to extensive preload requirements

Option 3: Diamond Interchange With Trans-Canada Highway Over McKenzie/Admirals

Option Considerations Considerations Option 1: Diamond With TCH Under McKenzie / Admirals Operating Efficiency Safety Construction Schedule Traffic Noise Visual Impacts Park Encroachment Cost Transit Operations Pedestrian / Cycling Option 2: Partial Cloverleaf With TCH Under McKenzie/Admirals Option 3: Diamond With TCH Over McKenzie / Admirals Most Effective Least Effective

Traffic Simulations These screens show computer-generated simulations of the traffic patterns near the TCH/McKenzie interchange. The left screen shows the morning peak-hour traffic for current conditions and then with the McKenzie Interchange Project The right screen shows the afternoon peak-hour traffic for current conditions and then with the McKenzie Interchange Project As an example only, the new interchange is shown as Option 1: Diamond Interchange with TCH under McKenzie/Admirals. Options 2 and 3 would have similar traffic patterns. Please speak with a member of the team if you have questions.

Integrating Transit into the Project The Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure is working with BC Transit to accommodate longer-term plans for rapid transit within the McKenzie Interchange Project. For more information about the Transit Future Plan for Victoria Region, please visit: bctransit.com/victoria/transit-future. Bus Rapid Transit Services The TCH is identified as a future rapid transit corridor serving travel between the West Shore and downtown Victoria and the University of Victoria The project will be designed to support Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) facilities as services are increased in the future Bus Priority Treatments Bus on shoulders and queue jumpers at ramp intersections will provide more reliable service and better customer experience Attractive and fully accessible pedestrian connections to comfortable bus stops with shelters will be provided Potential Future Light Rail Transit (LRT) The project will not preclude future light rail transit on this corridor 0 250 500 1,000 1,500 Metres Each full bus takes up to 50 cars off the road = Legend Intersection Queue Jumpers & Stop / Station Areas Future Bus-On-Shoulder Treatment Project Limit Bus-On-Shoulder Treatment Bus-on-shoulder operations on Highway 99

Pedestrian and Cycling Considerations Provide safe and convenient pedestrian and cycling facilities Galloping Goose Trail over or under McKenzie Replace pedestrian overpass west of McKenzie Connect pedestrian paths to bus stops Separate vehicles and pedestrians as much as possible Cyclists crossing the Galloping Goose Trail at McKenzie Avenue

Technical Studies Technical engineering and environmental studies have and will continue to be undertaken to support to development of the project. Work underway includes: Geotechnical investigations to determine the depth, type and consistency of the soils under the proposed interchange Updated traffic counts to confirm traffic volumes and assist in designing the interchange and connections Noise monitoring adjacent to the TCH to assist in developing noise mitigation options Environmental work to identify potentially sensitive ecosystems and species at risk Additional work to be undertaken includes: Ongoing environmental work to determine specific mitigation strategies Archeological fieldwork, working with First Nations, to identify any possible archaeological sites Ground surveys to confirm the existing topography Geotechnical testing along TCH Noise monitoring beside TCH

Traffic Management During Construction Objectives: Maintain existing traffic flow as reliably and predictably as possible Maintain existing travel times for commuters during peak hours No increase in short-cutting traffic through neighbourhoods Minimize disruption to traffic flow Strategies: Build ramps first and use them as detours Screening to separate construction activities and traffic Provide regular construction updates and advance notification for specific construction activities utilizing social media, DriveBC website www.drivebc.ca and Changeable Message Signs Construction screening along TCH Changeable Message Sign in operation

Next Steps Consider input from this engagement period and from other stakeholder groups and First Nations Select preferred interchange design option Complete functional design of selected option to determine: Details of roadways and structures Locations of transit stops Design of pedestrian facilities crossing TCH and McKenzie Avenue Potential property and environmental effects and appropriate mitigation measures Provide opportunity for public input on functional design in spring 2016 Thank You for Coming! Please remember to provide us with your feedback by: Completing a feedback form and leaving it with our team Filling out the online feedback form at by December 11, 2015 Sending an email to mckenzieinterchange@gov.bc.ca by December 11, 2015 WE ARE HERE Conceptual Design Engagement Announcement of Federal and Provincial Project Funding July 2015 November December 2015 Functional Design Engagement Spring 2016 Construction Start Late 2016 Project Completion Late 2018

Introduction Thank you for your input! The Province of B.C. and the Government of Canada are investing $85 million in the development and construction of the McKenzie Interchange Project, a new interchange on the Trans-Canada Highway at the intersection with Admirals Road and McKenzie Avenue in Saanich, B.C. This intersection is the #1 bottleneck on Vancouver Island. This project will improve safety for all users, while reducing congestion and increasing reliability. There will be many opportunities for you to provide feedback throughout the project. This phase of consultation gives you the opportunity to share your input on design concepts and important considerations to be taken into account. All questions are optional. Questions How important are each of the following considerations to you as the Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure designs the McKenzie Interchange Project? Not important at all Not very important Somewhat important Very important Extremely important Increased safety for all users Encroachment into park Traffic noise after construction Improved pedestrian/cycling connections Accommodating transit operations Operating efficiency i.e. travel time savings (for drivers, transit users and cyclists) Cost Visual impacts Construction schedule 1 McKenzie Interchange Project Feedback Form November December 2015

Are there any additional considerations that you would like to provide us as we develop the McKenzie Interchange Project? How often do you travel through the intersection of Highway 1 and Admirals Road/McKenzie Avenue? 4 or more times per week 1-3 times per week Fewer than 3 times per month How do you currently use the intersection of Highway 1 and Admirals Road/McKenzie Avenue? (select all that apply) Car Bike As a pedestrian (walking, wheelchair, electric scooter, etc...) Transit How likely would you be to use each of the following methods to find out more and provide your input regarding the McKenzie Interchange Project? Very unlikely Somewhat unlikely Neither likely nor unlikely Somewhat likely Very likely Project website () Email Mail Newspaper Ads Open Houses Social Media (Facebook, Twitter, etc) Calling the project phone line at 250 387-8700 November December 2015 McKenzie Interchange Project Feedback Form 2

Please provide any comments you may have regarding the interchange design options or the project in general. Thank you for your input! Public and stakeholder engagement are essential to the success of this project, which benefits from the knowledge and experience of those who travel in the McKenzie Interchange Project area. Privacy Policy Personal information collected through this survey will inform the Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure McKenzie Interchange Project under the authority of s.26 of the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act. If you have any questions about the collection, use and disclosure of your personal information, please contact: David Hume Executive Director, Citizen Engagement PO BOX 9029, STN PROV GOV Victoria BC V8V 9L9 Ph: 250 589-9043 3 McKenzie Interchange Project Feedback Form November December 2015