Study Management SM STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR Interactions with the Institutional Review Board (IRB)

Similar documents
UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD CONTINUING REVIEW AND REAPPROVAL OF RESEARCH

Reporting an Unanticipated Problem Involving Risks to Subjects or Others (UPIRTSO) to the IRB

University of Iowa External/Central IRB Reliance Process Standard Operating Procedure (SOP)

CONTINUING REVIEW CRITERIA FOR RENEWAL

UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA Institutional Review Board

CONTINUING REVIEW 3/7/2016

SOP 801: Investigator Qualifications and Responsibilities

Independent Ethics Committees

Supersedes Document Dated: 7/7/11. SOP: RR 401 Version No.: 07 Version Date: 9/8/15 EXPEDITED REVIEW 1. POLICY

RESEARCH SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

Human Research Protection Program Policy

SOP 407: PROTOCOL DEVIATIONS AND UNANTICIPATED PROBLEMS

Children s Hospital of Philadelphia Committees for the Protection of Human Subjects Policies and Procedures Continuing Review of Approved Research

University of Pennsylvania Institutional Review Board. Reliance Agreement Guidance: Post-Approval Submissions

OHRP Guidance on Written IRB Procedures

Screening and Enrollment Log. List of all subjects screened and all subjects screened and enrolled in the study.

UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD PROCEDURES FOR FULL BOARD REVIEW

7.0 DEVIATION and EXCEPTION of a PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PROTOCOL

IRB MEETING ADMINISTRATION

The Children s Hospital of Philadelphia Committee for the Protection of Human Subjects Policies and Procedures. Cooperative Agreements

Chapter 4 Institutional Review Board (IRB) Roles and Authorities

Date Effective 4/21/2008 Identification

CONTINUING REVIEW CRITERIA FOR RENEWAL

UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD CONTINUING REVIEW OF RESEARCH

Section 8. Continuing Review of Ongoing IRB-Approved Research (Revised 7/1/10)

Baptist Health Institutional Review Board. Study Closure Report (Expedited Review) IRB #: Study Title:

Effective Date: January 16, 2012 Policy Number: MHC_RP0107. Revised Date: November 2, 2015 Oversight Level: Corporate

EXPEDITED REVIEW. Terms used in this policy, but not defined herein shall have the meanings set forth in the Glossary.

Guidance for IRBs, Clinical Investigators, and Sponsors IRB Continuing Review after Clinical Investigation Approval

Human Research Protections Program Medical College of Wisconsin and Froedtert Memorial Lutheran Hospital

IRB-REQUIRED INVESTIGATOR ACTIONS

AMENDMENTS TO PREVIOUSLY APPROVED RESEARCH 3/01/2016

CONTINUING REVIEW OF APPROVED IRB PROTOCOLS

IRB MEETING ADMINISTRATION

Institutional Review Board Standard Operating Procedure. Suspension and Termination of IRB Approval

Wayne State University Institutional Review Board

Standard Operating Policy and Procedures (SOPP) 3:

INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD (IRB) PROCEDURES

Policy Number: 42 Title: Investigational Devices Date of Last Revision: 06/12/2008; 07/22/2010; 05/29/2013; 05/01/2016; 10/16/2018

Signature Date Date First Effective: Signature Date Revision Date:

To assure knowledge and compliance by documenting the annual administrative review and continuing IRB review of non-exempt projects for the IRB.

I. Summary. II. Responsibilities

Children s Hospital of Philadelphia Committees for the Protection of Human Subjects Policies and Procedures. IRB Review Processes

The IRB reviews and monitors human subjects research conducted by Columbia College Chicago faculty, staff, and students.

I. Summary. II. Responsibilities

SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH

HEALTH CARE SYSTEMS RESEARCH NETWORK

Yale University Human Research Protection Program

Institutional Review Board - Restriction s Impo sed

Inspections, Compliance, Enforcement, and Criminal Investigations

Investigator Manual. If you have questions about whether an activity requires IRB review, contact the IRB Office.

Version 1. Submission Guide and Policies

SOP 5.06 Full Committee Review: Initial IRB Review

SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTION PROGRAM STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES 02 06/30/10 08/01/07 1 OF 6

What s New in GCP? FDA, OHRP Issue Harmonized Guidance on Transferring IRB Oversight of Clinical Studies

Tuesday, May 15, Please be sure to sign in and take copies of each handout.

PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR S ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RESPONSIBILITIES

EMERGENCY USE 03/02/2016

Current Status: Active PolicyStat ID: Origination: 04/2018 Effective: 04/2018 Approved: 04/2018 Last Revised: 04/2018 Expiration: 04/2021

1. Review and approval of the consent document is a responsibility that FDA assigns to the IRB with jurisdiction

Issue in IRB Approvals:

University of Pennsylvania Institutional Review Board. Reliance Agreement Guidance: Penn as Central IRB FAQ

Info Sheet - Operations Office for Human Research Studies

(y9. &i?r, JUL t Certified-Return Receipt Requested WARNING LE7TER

To assure knowledge and compliance by documenting the continuing review procedure of approved projects for the IRB.

University of Cincinnati. Radiation Safety Committee Operations Guidelines Statement of Policy (RSC Guidelines) RSC Guidelines (revision 5)

SOP #2-2 Version #1 Date First Effective: December 14, Page 1 of 6

Initial Review. Approved By: Michele Kennett, JD, MSN, LLM Associate Vice Chancellor for Research. Table of Contents

CUNY HRPP Procedures: Multisite Non-Exempt Human Subjects Research

INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD (IRB) PROCEDURES

SOP Title Review of Research: Devices for Humanitarian Uses

Human Subjects in Research Review and Monitoring Form. Not applicable

Administrative Hold, Suspension, or Termination of IRB Approval

Ceded IRB Review. The University of Arizona has standing agreements in place for the following entities regarding ceded IRB review:

Effective Date Revisions Date Review by the Convened Institutional Review Board

Research Involving Human Subjects: AA 110.7

IRB Chair Responsibilities

Yale University Institutional Review Boards

Florida State University IRB Standard Operational Procedures

Information Sheet Guidance For IRBs, Clinical Investigators, and Sponsors

Humanitarian Use Devices Made Simple

Michigan State University Human Research Protection Program

RESEARCH PROTECTIONS OFFICE

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN S E RVICES, 'mgr,':~~ MAY WARNING LETTE R

Oklahoma State University Institutional Review Board Standard Operating Procedures

Investigator Manual Version date: April 1, 2010

Review of Research by the Convened IRB

DOCUMENTATION OF IRB DISCUSSIONS AND DECISIONS ( IRB MINUTES)

Jeffrey A. Cooper, MD, MMM Huron Consulting Group

21 CFR Part 56 - Institutional Review Boards

Submitting Continuing Reviews and/or Amendments to the IRB

AUTHORITY AND PURPOSE

Title: EXPEDITED IRB REVIEW OF HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH

USC Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

November 30, Efficient Startup of Multi-site Research Studies: Central IRBs and National IRB Reliance Platforms

IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY Institutional Review Board. Policy on IRB Review of Protocol Deviations and Noncompliance for Non-exempt Research

IRBMED: Ceding IRB Review to an External IRB

the HRPP Director will prepare a draft report within three (3) workdays after the IRB meeting at which the determination occurred.

CUNY HRPP Policy: Suspension or Termination of Human Subject Research

COMPLIANCE MONITORING

Transcription:

Study Management SM 302.00 STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR Interactions with the Institutional Review Board (IRB) Approval: Nancy Paris, MS, FACHE President and CEO 24 May 2017 (Signature and Date) Approval: Frederick M. Schnell, MD, FACP Chief Medical Officer 30 May 2017 (Signature and Date) Issue Date: 01 June 2017 Effective Date: 01 June 2017 Expiration Date: 01 June 2019 Document Review Date: 01 March 2017 Reviewer: Joni N. Shortt, BSN, RN, CCRC Primary Author: Anita Clavier, BSN, MPH Previous Reviewer: Alice S. Kerber, MN, APRN (March 2014) Page 1 of 13

I. INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE The primary responsibility of the Institutional Review Board (IRB) is to protect the rights and welfare of research subjects. Federal regulations require that the IRB ensure that certain criteria for approval of research are met prior to approving a study. The Investigator must provide the IRB with the information necessary to permit an informed decision on whether to approve, disapprove, or to require modifications prior to approval. By signing the Form FDA 1572, the Investigator ensures that the IRB reviewing the research complies with the regulations. Additionally, the Investigator agrees to inform the IRB of any changes to the protocol and any materials used to recruit subjects, as well as any additional risks to subjects associated with the investigational article. This SOP describes how Georgia CORE communicates with the central IRB on behalf of the Georgia CORE network sites who use a central IRB throughout the research process in order to ensure compliance with the regulations and to protect the safety and well-being of study subjects. Georgia CORE network sites that use a local IRB are responsible for following their standard operating procedures for interacting with the IRB. Georgia CORE will monitor the IRB interactions of the sites using local IRBs 2. SCOPE This SOP applies to Georgia CORE s interactions with the central IRB responsible for research subject to investigational new drug (IND) regulations for drugs and biologics or those eligible for investigational new drug (IND) exemption during all phases of development carried out at the Georgia CORE network sites which use a central IRB. Georgia CORE will monitor the IRB interactions of the sites using local IRB and central IRBs. The central IRB refers to the nonfederal IRBs used for industry clinical trials or investigator initiated trials in which Georgia CORE acts as a Site Management Organization (SMO). For NCI sponsored trials, the Central IRB (CIRB) refers to the federal IRB in which government sponsored trials are initiated. 3. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS AND GUIDELINES 21 CFR 312.32 IND safety reports 21 CFR 312.53 Selecting investigators and monitors 21 CFR 312.54 Emergency research 21 CFR 312.66 Assurance of IRB review 21 CFR 50 Protection of Human Subjects 21 CFR 56 Institutional Review Boards 45 CFR 46 Protection of Human Subjects FDA Information Frequently Asked Questions, Continuing Review After Page 2 of 13

Sheets, October 1998 October 2009 May 1997 Study Approval Guidance for Industry Investigator Responsibilities Protecting the Rights, Safety, and Welfare of Study Subjects International Conference on Harmonization; Good Clinical Practice: Consolidated Guideline 4. REFERENCES TO OTHER APPLICABLE SOPs GA-102 SS-201 SS-204 SM-301 SM-303 SM-304 SM-305 SM-306 Sponsor Responsibility and Delegation of Responsibility Assessing Protocol Feasibility Site Initiation Visit Communication Documentation and Records Retention Routine Monitoring Visits Closeout Visits Adverse Event Reporting 5. ATTACHMENTS A. Checklist for IRB submission B. Checklist for IRB submission of changes in research C. Template letter for reporting IND safety reports to the IRB D. Periodic report to the IRB 6. RESPONSIBILITY This SOP applies to Georgia CORE staff members and others involved in communicating with the central IRB to ensure appropriate management of all study activity. This includes the following: President and CEO Georgia CORE staff and consultants 7. DEFINITIONS The following definitions from the Code of Federal Regulations and the International Conference on Harmonization, Good Clinical Practice: Consolidated Guideline apply to this SOP. Adverse event: Any untoward medical occurrence in a study subject administered a pharmaceutical product; it does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. Approval in relation to Institutional Review Boards (IRBs): The affirmative decision of the IRB that the clinical trial has been reviewed and may be conducted at the institution site within the Page 3 of 13

constraints set forth by the IRB, the institution, good clinical practice (GCP), and the applicable regulatory requirements. Informed Consent: A process by which a subject voluntarily confirms his or her willingness to participate in a particular trial, after having been informed of all aspects of the trial that are relevant to the subject s decision to participate. Informed consent is documented by means of a written, signed, and dated informed consent form. Institutional Review Board (IRB): An independent body constituted of medical, scientific, and nonscientific members, whose responsibility it is to ensure the protection of the rights, safety, and well-being of human subjects involved in a trial by, among other things, reviewing, approving, and providing continuing review of trials, of protocols and amendments, and of the methods and material to be used in obtaining and documenting informed consent of the trial subjects. Protocol: A document that describes the objective(s), design, methodology, statistical considerations, and organization of a trial. The protocol usually also gives the background and rationale for the trial, but these could be provided in other protocol referenced documents. Throughout the ICH GCP Guideline, the term protocol refers to protocol and protocol amendments. Protocol Amendment: A written description of a change(s) to or formal clarification of a protocol. Serious Adverse Event (SAE) or Serious Adverse Drug Reaction (Serious ADR): Any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or requires medical or surgical interventions to prevent any of the above outcomes. Well-being of the trial subjects: The physical and mental integrity of the subjects participating in a clinical trial. 8. PROCESS OVERVIEW A. Documenting IRB compliance B. Communicating with the IRB at study start-up C. Communicating with the IRB while the study is ongoing D. Communicating with the IRB when the study is over 9. PROCEDURES A. Documenting IRB compliance Responsible Staff: Research Staff/Consultant Procedure: Ensure that the IRB is duly constituted and compliant with federal and state regulation which can be completed by checking that the Page 4 of 13

IRB has been accredited by the Association for the Accreditation of Human Subject Research Protection Programs (AAHRPP) and/or obtaining a letter of compliance from the IRB. Request a copy of the IRB s guidelines for sponsors. Request a copy of the IRB membership list and the general assurance number (if available). B. Communicating with the IRB at study start-up Research Staff/ Consultant Research Staff/ Consultant Using the IRB procedure manual (if available) and the appropriate form, complete the initial IRB submission. Include all attachments as directed, e.g., the protocol, investigator s brochure, informed consent form and advertisements (Attachment A, Checklist for IRB Submission). Submit the package for the next scheduled meeting. Obtain documentation of IRB approval for the protocol, informed consent, and other supporting material prior to study start. Copy Sponsor/CRO, if applicable, and network sites on correspondence. Through direct contact with the central IRB for those sites using the central IRB Through the network sites using local IRBs Maintain all documents in the appropriate study files. C. Communicating with the IRB while the study is ongoing Research Staff/Consultant Notify the IRB of any changes to the protocol and/or informed consent and of new information on the investigational product. (Attachment B, Checklist for IRB submission of changes in research) Obtain documentation of IRB approval of amendments and revisions to study-related documents, such as advertisements, prior to implementation except to eliminate apparent hazard to subject safety. Copy sponsor/cro, if applicable, and site(s) on correspondence. Notify the IRB promptly of all serious or alarming events occurring during the approval period for the ongoing study according to the FDA and central IRB guidelines. (Note: Some IRBs do not require a report if changes to the study or informed consent are not proposed.) The report should include: Adverse event description/treatment/outcome (including relevant dates) Page 5 of 13

Research Staff/ Consultant Pertinent subject history Why the event is considered unanticipated Why the event is considered a problem involving risks to human subjects or others, i.e., how does this event suggest that subjects or others are at greater risk of harm than was previously known? What are the proposed changes to the consent form and/or protocol in order to protect the rights, welfare, and safety of the research subjects? If none are proposed, provide the rationale why changes are not needed, if the IRB requires a report when changes are not proposed. Submit to the Investigator all IND Safety Reports and MedWatch Reports received from the sponsor who will review the reports as described in SOP SM-306 Adverse Event Reporting, Attachment D, Algorithm for Review and Distribution of IND Safety and MedWatch Reports. Use Attachment C, Reporting IND Safety Reports to the IRB or the IRB s form when sending reports to the IRB. Report all AEs to the IRB as part of the periodic or annual reporting requirements. Submit periodic report form for renewal of protocol as requested (Attachment D, Periodic Report to the IRB can be used if the IRB does not provide a standard form to be completed). Maintain all documents in the appropriate study files. Obtain from each network site that is using a local IRB copies of all communications between the sites and respective IRB. D. Communicating with the IRB when the study is over Research Staff/Consultant Complete the study closure report as required by the IRB with a copy to the sponsor, if applicable, and to the site. The report should include: Date study closed Total subjects who signed the consent form If there were any unanticipated problems involving risks to subjects or others at the site that were not previously reported to the central IRB Any other pertinent comments about the study, including outcome results of the study, if known. Provide the network sites that used a local IRB with a copy of the central IRB report so the sites can submit a study closure report to their local IRB. Page 6 of 13

10. History of Changes Version Section Number Modification Approval Date Number 302.00 All Original Version 302.00 All No change was 09 March 2012 necessary 302.00 All No change was 01 July 2014 necessary 302.00 2 Clarification of CIRB versus NCI CIRB 17 March 2017 Page 7 of 13

SM-302.00 SOP for interactions with the IRB Attachment A CHECKLIST FOR IRB SUBMISSION Central IRB initial review submission form* Study summary Research protocol* Investigator's brochure (if applicable) Proposed informed consent form* Proposed patient information (instructions, diaries, etc.) Up-to-date curriculum vitae of principal investigator Up-to-date curriculum vitae of sub investigator(s) or other staff listed on Form FDA 1572 Copy of current medical license with expiration date for principal investigator and sub investigators (if applicable) Other supporting material (e.g., sample of any proposed advertising, questionnaires, subject diaries)* Copy of Form FDA 1572 (if required) Documentation from sponsor or FDA verifying the IND (Investigational New Drug) number if one is required for the research. In an IND is not required, provide the reason why in writing. *Denotes documents typically required for approvable submission. (Approvable submission can be requested by the sponsor/cro during the planning stages of a multi-center study. If the IRB finds the research acceptable, the submitter is issued a letter documenting the Board s determination, a redlined template consent form indicating the IRB s changes and appropriate documentation of the review of the other submitted subject materials. Certificate of Approval (COA) will not be issued, however, until the remaining appropriate investigator documents are received and reviewed by the IRB.) Page 8 of 13

SM-302.00 SOP for interactions with the IRB Attachment B CHECKLIST FOR IRB SUBMISSION OF CHANGES IN RESEARCH Protocol Changes (Amendments, Administrative Changes, etc: Central IRB Change in Research and Subject Recruitment Submission Form A rationale for the change(s) Summary of changes for the new amendment to the protocol (or if previously submitted and approved, submit the amendment title page and signature page only) Planned Protocol Deviation: Provide the details of the planned deviation. Consent Form Modifications: Central IRB Change in Research and Subject Recruitment Submission Form Copy of the IRB approved consent form with changes marked and the rationale for the changes or submit a document detailing the requested changes. Note any changes to addresses (include an updated 1572, if applicable) or phone numbers. Change of Principal Investigator: Written confirmation that the change is acceptable and has been approved by the sponsor, a letter from the original investigator relinquishing responsibility for the study, and a letter from the new investigator accepting responsibility for the study. Submit an IRB initial review submission form or the Investigator Submission Form for Multi- Center Protocols, license and CV for the new investigator, a modified 1572 (when applicable), and a request to modify the existing consent form to reflect the new investigator s name and contact information (when applicable). Addresses and Phone Number Changes: An updated 1572 (if applicable) and a copy of the IRB s additional site form for each new or updated location Change or Addition of Laboratory Recruitment Materials: Page 9 of 13

SM-302.00 SOP for interactions with the IRB Copy of the IRB Change in Research and Subject Recruitment (Ads) Submission form If any of the recruitment materials have been previously approved by the IRB, attach a copy of the previously-approved item(s), even if they are from a different protocol Indicate if any submitted scripts will be used as Public Service Announcements, and whether they will be announcer-read (verbatim) or recorded If submitted materials reference a web site, attach a hard copy of the recruitment sections of the web site for IRB review If submitting written or verbal screening materials for screening subjects prior to enrollment in the research (such as telephone scripts, written or web-based questionnaires or pre-screening forms), describe the screening plan. A script for all audio and video materials The above is not an exhaustive list of the changes in research that may need to be reported to the IRB. The IRB guideline should be used as a reference and/or the IRB should be contacted to obtain instructions. Page 10 of 13

SM-302.00 SOP for interactions with the IRB Attachment C TEMPLATE LETTER FOR REPORTING IND SAFETY REPORTS TO THE IRB <Date> <Name> Chairperson Institutional Review Board <Hospital> <City, State, Zip code> RE: <Protocol Title> Dear Chairperson: Enclosed please find an IND Safety Report #, submitted to us by <sponsor> for the above referenced study. The federal regulations require that sponsors notify investigators of immediately reportable adverse events that have occurred worldwide in connection with the investigational drug. I am, in turn, notifying you of this event. In my opinion, information contained in this IND Safety Report (does/does not) require a change to our approved informed consent form. (Enclose revised consent form when a change is being requested) If you have any questions, please call. Sincerely, <Signature> Copy: Study file Page 11 of 13

SM-302.00 SOP for interactions with the IRB Attachment D PERIODIC REPORT TO THE IRB Protocol Title: Date of Report: / / Interim Report Renew approval for the study The study has ended Completed Terminated Not Started Inactive Date / / Date / / If the study is inactive, terminated or never started, please state the reason. 1. Study Summary a. Results obtained to date, if any. b. Have there been any significant new findings? Yes No c. Has there been an interim analysis? Yes No d. Have there been any changes to the approved protocol that have not been reviewed by the IRB? Yes No 2. Site Summary a. Number of subjects enrolled at this site b. Number of subjects who withdrew or discontinued participation for a reason other than an adverse event Page 12 of 13

SM-302.00 SOP for interactions with the IRB c. Number of subjects who discontinued participation in the study because of an adverse event d. Number of subjects who experienced a serious adverse event e. Summarize serious adverse events that occurred in the study. f. Explain why any subjects terminated their participation prematurely. 3. Have all serious adverse events, whether related to the study article or not, been reported to the IRB? (Please include reports of serious adverse events not reported, including sponsor-generated reports.) Yes No 4. Have all subjects signed the approved informed consent form? If not, please explain. Yes No 5. Have all subjects received a copy of the informed consent form? If not, please explain. Yes No I certify that the information on this report and any attachments accompanying this report are correct. Submitted by: on / / Page 13 of 13