Travel Patterns and Characteristics

Similar documents
2011 Transportation Tomorrow Survey. Data Presentation

TRANSPORTATION TOMORROW SURVEY

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF CALEDON TRANSPORTATION NEEDS STUDY

Welcome. The Brooklin Secondary Plan and Transportation Master Plan are collectively referred to as the Brooklin Study.

Chapter 2 Current and Future Conditions

Discussion Paper 1 June 2014 Current State of Transportation in Burlington

Transportation Master Plan Advisory Task Force

DON MILLS-EGLINTON Mobility Hub Profile

4 Ridership Growth Study

Public Consultation Centre For. Transportation Master Plan Update. Information Package

DUNDAS WEST-BLOOR Mobility Hub Profile

Public Event 1 Community Workshops

Travel Patterns and Cycling opportunites

Understanding Transit Demand. E. Beimborn, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee

2 BOLTON COMMUTER RAIL SERVICE FEASIBILITY STUDY

2011 Origin-Destination Survey Bicycle Profile

June 2015 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION SNAPSHOT

DON MILLS-SHEPPARD Mobility Hub Profile

NEWMARKET CENTRE Mobility Hub Profile

NORTH YORK CENTRE Mobility Hub Profile

York Region Population and Employment Growth

Transportation Master Plan

Transportation Trends, Conditions and Issues. Regional Transportation Plan 2030

Appendix D. Discussion Papers

APPENDIX 2 LAKESHORE ROAD TRANSPORTATION REVIEW STUDY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.

Peterborough Council on Aging

July 23, Transit Workshop

January Project No

Markham Sports, Entertainment and Cultural Centre Transportation Overview

Transit System Performance Update

WELCOME Region of Waterloo Transportation Master Plan Update Public Consultation Centre

Briefing Paper #1. An Overview of Regional Demand and Mode Share

Moving Cambridge. City of Cambridge Transportation Master Plan Public Consultation Centre. March 7, :00 8:00 PM.

Coolest Cities Results Summary

4 DISRUPTION MANAGEMENT PLAN HIGHWAY 7 RAPIDWAY CONSTRUCTION BETWEEN BAYVIEW AVENUE AND WARDEN AVENUE TOWNS OF MARKHAM AND RICHMOND HILL

2. Transportation in Ottawa Today and Tomorrow

Measuring and Communicating Mobility:

Institute of Transportation Engineers

CITY OF HAMILTON PLANNING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Transportation Planning and Parking Division

Chapter 2 A Solid Foundation For Growth

Highway Transitway Corridor Study

City of Hamilton s Transportation Master Plan (TMP) Public Consultation 3 December 2015

Appendix 1 Transit Network Analysis

the Ministry of Transport is attributed as the source of the material

RMCAO. June 5, 2015 Title Date

Guidelines for Providing Access to Public Transportation Stations APPENDIX C TRANSIT STATION ACCESS PLANNING TOOL INSTRUCTIONS

Public Consultation Centre

County of Simcoe Transportation Master Plan

WELCOME TO OPEN HOUSE # 1 June 14, 2017

Arterial Transitway Corridors Study. Ave

2.2 TRANSIT VISION 2040 FROM VISION TO ACTION. Emphasize transit priority solutions STRATEGIC DIRECTION

APPENDIX H EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS ANALYSIS

2014 peterborough city and county. active. transportation. & health. indicators primer

Appendix B Workshop Materials

RE-CYCLING A CITY: EXAMINING THE GROWTH OF CYCLING IN DUBLIN

TRANSPORTATION MODAL SHARE TARGETS AND TRANSIT STRATEGIES POLICY PAPER FINAL REPORT JANUARY

1999 On-Board Sacramento Regional Transit District Survey

Report on trends in mode share of vehicles and people crossing the Canal Cordon to 2013

WHITE PAPER: TRANSIT SERVICE FOR SOUTH SHAGANAPPI

Acknowledgements. Ms. Linda Banister Ms. Tracy With Mr. Hassan Shaheen Mr. Scott Johnston

Chapter 4 Transportation Strategies to Support Growth

Exceeding expectations: The growth of walking in Vancouver and creating a more walkable city in the future through EcoDensity

Preliminary Transportation Analysis

VIVA RETIREMENT COMMUNITIES OAKVILLE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY

Appendix J Transportation Master Plan Assessment

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION

UBC Vancouver Transportation Status Report Fall 2014

Modal Shift in the Boulder Valley 1990 to 2009

INITIAL BUSINESS CASE REPORT

Calgary Transit Route 302 Southeast BRT Year One Review June

THE I-79 CORRIDOR. I-79 provides motorists with connections to the following major highways: I-80, PA 358, PA 965 and PA 208.

A NEW PATH TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN

Climate Change Action Plan: Transportation Sector Discussion Paper: Cycling

Pocatello Regional Transit Master Transit Plan Draft Recommendations

Tulsa Metropolitan Area LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN

Current Travel Needs and Operating Conditions (See pages 4 9 of the Discussion Guide)

PASSENGER SURVEY RESULTS

Thursday 18 th January Cambridgeshire Travel Survey Presentation to the Greater Cambridge Partnership Joint Assembly

Regional Transportation Needs Within Southeastern Wisconsin

Afeasibility study to evaluate bus rapid transit service in the East-West Corridor connecting major employment and activity centers between downtown

Transportation Master Plan Advisory Task Force

Having held a public hearing, that Council approve:

Mayfield West Phase 2 Stage 2 Transportation Assessment. Town of Caledon. Paradigm Transportation Solutions Limited

Walking the Talk: Sustainable Transport and Urban Design in Four New Zealand Cities

Purpose and Need. Chapter Introduction. 2.2 Project Purpose and Need Project Purpose Project Need

Travel Behaviour Study of Commuters: Results from the 2010 Dalhousie University Sustainability Survey

Rural Ontario s Hidden Sector: The Economic Importance of the Horse Industry Final Report

8 PROPOSED ROUNDABOUT DUFFERIN STREET AND KING VAUGHAN ROAD INTERSECTION CITY OF VAUGHAN

The Regional Municipality of York. Transportation. Master Plan. November Transportation Master Plan

4.0 INTERMUNICIPAL TRANSIT

Centennial Neighbourhoods Transportation Management Plan Summary of Phase 1 Consultation. Overview of Issues

Land at Chesterton, Cirencester

Sixth Line Development - Transit Facilities Plan

CITY OF ABBOTSFORD TRANSPORTATION AND TRANSIT MASTER PLAN

Appendix A-K Public Information Centre 2 Materials

Prepared For: Shieldbay Developments Inc. c/o Matson, McConnell Ltd. 2430A Bloor Street West Toronto, Ontario M6S 1P9.

AAMPO Regional Transportation Attitude Survey

Travel and Rider Characteristics for Metrobus

North Coast Corridor:

Transcription:

DRAFT 2006 Transportation Fact Book SECTION 4 Travel Patterns and Characteristics 43

2006 Transportation Fact Book DRAFT 44

DRAFT 2006 Transportation Fact Book Why do we conduct travel surveys? The main purpose for collecting travel behaviour information from household travel surveys is to understand travel habits of residents and provide base data for long range planning and improvement of transportation facilities through the development of travel demand models. Travel models such as the Region s Travel Demand Forecasting Model cannot be developed solely on the basis of traffic and transit counts. These models simulate the various components of travel behaviour: auto ownership, trip frequency (trip generation), and the distribution of trips between origins and destinations by travel mode. Travel surveys answer the basic questions of: have trip rates (trip frequencies) changed? Are average trip lengths stable over time? York Region, along with other municipalities in the GTA + Hamilton (GTAH) conduct two primary travel surveys, the Transportation Tomorrow Survey (TTS) and the Cordon Count Program, which are further described in this section. For more information on Travel Surveys please contact; Infrastructure Planning Branch Planning and Development Services Department Tel: (905) 830-4444 ext. 5024 Toll Free: 1-877-464-9675 ext. 5024 45

2006 Transportation Fact Book Transportation Tomorrow Survey (TTS) DRAFT Considered one of the largest travel surveys in North America, the Transportation Tomorrow Survey (TTS) is a comprehensive travel survey conducted in the Greater Toronto Area + Hamilton (GTAH) once every five years. This important travel survey is a cooperative effort by the Province of Ontario, 18 local government agencies, GO Transit and the Toronto Transit Commission to collect information about urban travel. An understanding of urban travel results in better decisions on road and transit improvements. Similar surveys were undertaken in 1986, 1991, 1996, 2001 and 2006. The resulting information has been widely used in literally hundreds of transportation planning studies. The TTS is a survey that collects information on how each member of a household uses the transportation system on a typical weekday. The information from each household is processed, stored and used in a form that does not permit any particular household to be identified. Names, addresses and phone numbers are destroyed at the conclusion of the survey s data verification phase. City of Barrie Simcoe City of Orillia City of Kawartha Lakes Peterborough The 2006 TTS completed approximately 150,000 household interviews, of which 14,000 were in York Region. The survey collected the daily travel patterns of 402,000 people making over 864,000 trips. Overall the survey represents the daily travel patterns of 7.7 million people across the GTAH and surrounding regions. Dufferin Town of Orangeville City of Guelph Wellington Waterloo Halton Peel Durham York City of Toronto City of Peterborough For more information on the Transportation Tomorrow Survey please contact: Joint Program in Transportation University of Toronto 35 St. George Street, Room 305 Toronto, ON M5S 1A4 Tel: (416) 978-7282 Hamilton- Wentworth Web Site: http://www.jpint.utoronto.ca/ttshome/ Brant City of Brantford Niagara 2006 TTS Survey Area 46

DRAFT 2006 Transportation Fact Book 2006 Transportation Tomorrow Survey Travel Characteristics of York Region Households Number of Cars Available York Region residents have more cars per household than the average GTAH resident. 66 percent of York households have two or more cars available compared to an average of 44 percent for the GTAH. In York Region, only four percent of households do not have a car compared to 26 percent in the City of Toronto and 16 percent in the GTAH. Area 0 car 1 car 2 cars 3 cars 4+ cars York Region 4% 29% 5 12% 4% GTAH 16% 4 35% 7% 2% Possession of Driver Licence There is a higher percentage of women having a driver s licence in York Region than in the GTAH. Area Male with Driver Licence Female with Driver Licence York Region 71% 65% GTAH 69% 59% Trips Per Day York Region residents make the same number of daily trips per person (work and overall trips) as the rest of the GTAH. However, due to having the highest average household size, the number of trips per household in York Region is the highest in the GTAH. Area Household average trips/day Daily work trips/worker York Region 6.7 0.77 GTAH 5.7 0.77 Total Number of Trips Most daily trips (8) made by York Region residents stay in York Region. However, work trips are split almost equally in going to Toronto and staying in York Region. York Region Residents to: 24 Hour Period City of Toronto Durham York Peel Halton City of Hamilton Other Region Total All Trips 302,000 10,000 1,483,000 36,000 4,000 1,000 18,000 1,854,000 Work Trips 144,000 4,000 161,000 23,000 2,000 500 5,000 339,500 AM period (6-9) All Trips 147,000 4,000 290,000 18,000 2,000 500 4,000 465,500 Work Trips 109,000 3,000 109,000 17,000 1,000 500 3,000 242,500 47

2006 Transportation Fact Book 2006 Transportation Tomorrow Survey Highlight of Travel Characteristics The percentage of York Region residents using transit for their morning commute has increased for the first time in 20 years. Automobile use (79 percent during the morning peak period) is the main transportation mode in York Region. The rate of public transit use is nine percent with a further five percent by school bus. York Region residents are making approximately 8% less trips per capita than in 2001. 47 percent of work trips made by York Region residents remain within the Region. Work trip destinations to other areas are: Toronto 42 percent, Peel 7 percent, Halton 1 percent, Durham 1 percent and Simcoe County 1 percent. DRAFT Transit Use By York Residents (A.M. Peak Period) Daily Transit & School Bus Trips 80,000 70,000 60,000 50,000 40,000 30,000 20,000 10,000 0 1986 1991 1996 2001 2006 TTS Survey Year Transit Trips A.M. Peak Period Trips by York Residents Transit Modal Split 18% 15% 12% 9% 6% 3% Transit & School Bus Share of Total Trips There are approximately 1.85 million trips made by York residents on an average weekday. GTAH residents make 12.2 million daily trips, 7.6 million of these trips are by automobile. Work trips to York Region have the highest average trip length in comparison to the other regions in the GTAH. In general, work trip lengths are increasing across the GTAH. Percentage of Trips 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 Other School Work Non-work and non-school (commonly called discretionary) trips are becoming more and more important. This category now represents more than 50 percent of the daily trips and over 30 percent of all morning peak period travel made by York Region residents. 3 2 1 1986 1996 2001 2006 TTS Survey Year 48

DRAFT 2006 Transportation Fact Book 2006 Transportation Tomorrow Survey Method of Travel Trips Made by York Region Residents 8 York Region is still heavily dependant on automobile use with 79 percent of trips made by residents during the morning peak period using cars and vans. Non-auto modes are used for 21 percent of trips made by York residents during the morning peak period. The highest public transit use by York Region residents are for trips destined for Toronto in the morning peak period. The 25% public transit use is served by York Region Transit (YRT) and Viva at 16%, GO Transit at 9%. % of Total Trips 7 6 5 4 3 2 65% 69% 17% 14% 6-9 am 24 Hours 1 7% 5% Auto Driver Auto Passenger Local Transit GO Train Walk & Cycle School Bus + Other 3% Mode of Travel 1% 6% 4% 5% 3% Trips Made to York Region 8 Similarly, with many workers and shoppers commuting into York Region from neighbouring municipalities, 83 percent of trips made during the morning peak period into York are auto trips. 7 6 7 68% 6-9 am 24 Hours % of Total Trips 5 4 3 2 17% 15% 1 4% 4% Auto Driver Auto Passenger Local Transit GO Train Walk & Cycle School Bus + Other Mode of Travel 1% 7% 5% 6% 3% 49

2006 Transportation Fact Book Cordon Count / Screenline Program Full cordon count surveys are conducted every five years and are timed to coincide with other programs such as the GTA wide Transportation Tomorrow Survey (TTS) and the Federal Statistics Canada Census. A full cordon count was conducted in 2006 with the previous full count conducted in 2001. With York Region s rapid growth, interim monitoring is required more frequently than every five years. The last minor count was conducted in 2004. Collected data is used to assess changes in transit use, vehicle occupancy rates, congestion levels, travel patterns and trends. DRAFT accounted for 44% of the traffic crossing the York-Peel boundary and 26% of the traffic crossing the York-Durham boundary. For more information on the Cordon Count Program or to obtain a copy of the Cordon Count Bulletin please contact: Infrastructure Planning Branch Planning and Development Services Department Tel: (905) 830-4444 ext. 5028 Toll Free: 1-877-464-9675 ext. 5028 Twelve-hour counts (7:00a.m.- 7:00p.m.), representing all-day travel, were taken during the months of April, May and June, on weekdays (excluding Fridays). Records of the vehicle types and vehicle occupancy numbers were taken at 15- minute intervals. The following vehicle types were noted: Web Site: http://www.york.ca/services/regional+planning/infrastructure Exhibit 2: Percent Change in A.M. Peak Period Traffic Flow between 2001 and 2006 Passenger cars, taxicabs and light trucks with 1, 2, 3, 4 and more occupants Medium and heavy trucks. York Region Transit (YRT), VIVA Rapid Transit, Brampton Transit, TTC, GO Transit, school buses and other buses. Highlights of 2006 Cordon Count Program, which is the tenth in a series, are as follows: 14.5% 14.5% 23.5% 23.5% East Gwillimbury East Gwillimbury Ravenshoe Cordon 11.3% 20.3% Transit ridership increased at the major screenlines at a rate in excess of the very high growth of general traffic with the result that transit ridership gained market share across all screenlines except Durham and South York. This increase can be attributed to local service improvements and new routes since amalgamation of municipal transit services in 2001, and the more recent VIVA rapid transit initiatives. Peel Cordon Peel Cordon Simcoe Cordon 21.9% 26.1% Durham Cordon 25.9% 14.3% 17.5% Hwy 400 Cordon 13.6% Cordon 18.7% -3.5% 23.8% 14.9% Average car occupancy rates have dropped in most areas. This could be due in part to an increase in transit usage. Counts indicate there has been a significant upward trend in transit usage across almost all screenlines except the South York cordon and Durham and Peel boundaries. All day person trips across all screenlines continued to grow between 2001 and 2006. This growth ranged between 5% at the Georgina-East Gwillimbury cordon to 31% at the Durham boundary. Highway 407 South York Cordon Hwy 400 Cordon Cordon 28.5% Hwy 404 Cordon Hwy 404 Cordon Toronto Cordon 5.7% 7.9% Count Screenline 69.9% * Not to scale 50