REPORT GEO-TECHNICAL INVESTIGATION FOR THE PROPOSED BLOCK-7 SUB-STATION SY NO-225, NEAR RAYACHERLU VILLAGE

Similar documents
REPORT GEO-TECHNICAL INVESTIGATION FOR THE PROPOSED BLOCK-1 SUB-STATION SY NO-44, NEAR KYATAGANACHERLU VILLAGE

UNIT-I SOIL EXPLORATION

FINAL REPORT ON: GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION FOR ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATORY TRAINING INSTITUTE AT NIMLI VILLAGE, TIJARA ALWAR, RAJASTHAN.


CENGRS GEOTECHNICA PVT. LTD. Job No Sheet No. 1

SCHEDULE OF RATES FOR GEO-TECHNICAL INVESTIGATION WORKS FOR FAGMIL GRANULATED SINGLE SUPER PHOSPHATE PLANT AT CHITTORGARH, RAJASTHAN

INSTITUTE OF AERONAUTICAL ENGINEERING (Autonomous) Dundigal, Hyderabad CIVIL ENGINEERING TUTORIAL QUESTION BANK

INSTITUTE OF AERONAUTICAL ENGINEERING (Autonomous) Dundigal, Hyderabad

CONE PENETRATION TESTS

Geotechnical Engineering Laboratory CIVIL ENGINEERING VIRTUAL LABORATORY Experiment no 8 Standard Penetration Test

A REPORT ON SUB SOIL INVESTIGATION WORK NEW HAJ TOWER COMPLEX HOOGHLY RIVER BRIDGE COMMISSIONERS

Reinforced Soil Retaining Walls-Design and Construction

EXPERIMENTS IN GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING. Smt. S. R. PATEL ENGINEERING COLLEGE Dabhi, unjha Department of CIVIL engineering

GROUND IMPROVEMENT USING RAPID IMPACT COMPACTION

GEO TECHNICAL INVESTIGATION REPORT

Influence of Settlement on Bearing Capacity Analysis of Shallow Foundations on Sandy Clays in the Niger Delta, Nigeria

SUMMARY OF SUBSURFACE STRATIGRAPHY AND MATERIAL PROPERTIES

Bearing Capacity and Settlement Response of PMS Tanks on Cohesionless Soil Lithology in Lekki, Lagos of Nigeria

PUSH PIER SYSTEMS STABILITY. SECURITY. INTEGRITY. Push Pier Systems PN #MBPPT

ITEM 400 STRUCTURAL EXCAVATION AND BACKFILL

CIVE 554/650. Geotechnical Engineering. Rock. Soil. Water. Site Investigation Techniques. CIVE Knight 1. 1/8/2006 CIVE Knight 1

TYPES OF FOUNDATION. Superstructure. Substructure. Foundation

3. Types of foundation

Item 404 Driving Piling

The following notes supersede the related tender clauses and also become the part of tender document.

Sample Project with EPB TBM according to DIN 4085

Introduction of world construction methods and trends. Franz-Werner Gerressen, Head of Method Development, Tokyo,

Stabilization of Black Cotton Soil using Alkali Activated Fly Ash

1 CHAPTER 1. Standard Penetration Test: Corrections and Correlations. 1.1 General. 1.2 Standard Penetration Test (SPT)

SUPPORTING NOTES FOR THE EVALUATION OF UNBOUND ROAD BASE AND SUB-BASE AGGREGATES

TAO Safety Policy No. HS-5.1 Page 1 of 15 Revision No. 2 Revision Date: July 19, 2005

INFLUENCE OF FLY ASH IN STRENGTH CHARACTERISTICS OF COHESIVE SOILS

Soil Stabilization using Fly Ash and Rice Husk Ash

1) INTRODUCTION 2) THE UNFAIR ADVANTAGE

Desaturating sand deposit by air injection for reducing liquefaction potential

SOIL IMPROVEMENT BY VACUUM PRELOADING FOR A POWER PLANT PROJECT IN VIETNAM

Theory of a vertically loaded Suction Pile in CLAY

for Prepared for: Mr. Greg Hartz Tompkins Trust Company 121 East Seneca Street Ithaca, NY 14850

SOIL ANCHORS ETSAB/UPC J.Llorens - ETSAB/UPC PASSIVE ANCHORS - ANTECEDENTS

Stability of slopes of municipal solid waste landfills with co-disposal of biosolids

Shoreline Erosion Control Failures and How To Avoid Them

A Slipway Structure for River Ship Repair

Field Instruction. This instruction applies to Horizon Power employees and contractors involved in Horizon Power s underground projects.

LEVELTON CONSULTANTS LTD Clarke Place Richmond, BC V6V 2H9 T: F:

P Oskarshamn site investigation. Borehole: KAV01 Results of tilt testing. Panayiotis Chryssanthakis Norwegian Geotechnical Institute, Oslo

Field Instruction. This instruction applies to Horizon Power employees and contractors involved in Horizon Power s underground projects.

Formation level = m. Foundation level = m. Height of the wall above the Ground Level = 7.42 m

For a cantilever pile wall shown in Figure 1, assess the performance of the system and answer the following questions.

h o l l o w poles for foundat i o n s

LAMINATED POLES. engineered to solve problems. Coastal Douglas-fir. Field Raked and Tangent Poles

OP CHECKLIST FOR 1D CONSOLIDATION LABORATORY TEST

m v = 1.04 x 10-4 m 2 /kn, C v = 1.29 x 10-2 cm 2 /min

Influence of Fly Ash Content on Compaction Characteristics of Fly Ash Clay Mixture

Design Data 22M. Flotation of Circular Concrete Pipe. w w I = w - x 1000 (3) (SG x 1000)

HCMTCB MATERIALS SAMPLING & TESTING PERFORMANCE CHECKLIST

Appendix A Test Pit Logs

Fehmarnbelt Fixed Link. Geotechnical Large Scale Testing

An Introduction to Deep Foundations

Department of Civil & Geological Engineering GEOE Engineering Geology

W I L D W E L L C O N T R O L PRESSURE BASICS AND CONCEPTS

h o l l o w poles for foundat i o n s

TACKLING JACK-UP RIG NO-GO LOCATIONS. Prakasha Kuppalli ABSTRACT

Module 7 Lecture 1. Swelling and Collapse Behavior

Stability of Pipeline and details of Anchor blocks

Freeze-Thaw Effects and Gas Permeability of Utility Line Backfill

APPENDIX A1 - Drilling and completion work programme

Soils for civil engineering purposes

CHAPTER 3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND SITE CONDITION

Vertical Uplift Capacity of a Group of Equally Spaced Helical Screw Anchors in Sand

Performance Standards for Non-Turf Cricket Pitches Intended for Outdoor Use [TS6] ecb.co.uk

Ground Failure Mechanism of Micoropiled-raft

FP McCann Tunnels and Shafts 1

Construction Dewatering

New MacLean-Dixie 3-1/2 Strength Squared Pipe Piles/Anchors (Patent Pending) for Compression and Tension Applications

Downloaded from Downloaded from /1

Behavior of Square Footing Resting on Reinforced Sand Subjected to Static Load

Components of a Barrage

DIRECTIONAL DRILLING

Pressuremeters in Geotechnical Design

Typical factors of safety for bearing capacity calculation in different situations

Tex-207-F, Determining Density of Compacted Bituminous Mixtures

Venue Name / Location Complex Esportiu - Futbal Salou Report Number R A1. Primary Sport(s) Football

IN-PLACE DENSITY OF BITUMINOUS MIXES USING THE NUCLEAR MOISTURE-DENSITY GAUGE FOP FOR WAQTC TM 8

Inflatable Packers for Grouting 11/10/00

Shallow foundations settlement

Bridge Plugs, Ball Drop & Caged Ball Plugs For Zone Isolation

SITE S7: EMBANKMENT FAILURE WEST OF MILLARVILLE

Prof. B V S Viswanadham, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay

Lecture 8&9: Construction Dewatering

IN-PLACE DENSITY AND MOISTURE CONTENT OF SOIL AND SOIL- AGGREGATE BY NUCLEAR METHODS (SHALLOW DEPTH) FOP FOR AASHTO T 310

RECYCLED AGGREGATES FOR MINOR SCHEMES (RAMS)

RJ Kendall Pty Ltd. Building & Engineering Consultant. 5 th May Peter Fitzpatrick Director of Properties Diocese of Wagga Wagga

Risk Assessment and Mitigating Measures Regarding Pile Installation at EBS Biohub Jetty

RESISTANCE OF COMPACTED ASPHALT MIXTURE TO MOISTURE INDUCED DAMAGE (Kansas Test Method KT-56)

HCMTCB ASPHALT CERTIFICATION KEY ELEMENTS LIST

North American sealing solutions Bridge Plug Ball Drop Frac Plug Caged Ball Frac Plug

Guidance on piling, heavy loads, excavations, tunnelling and dewatering

Blowout during Workover Operation A case study Narration by: Tarsem Singh & Arvind Jain, OISD

DESIGN OF AXIALLY LOADED STEPPED FOOTING DATA :- SBC of soil =200 KN /m 2 Concrete Mix =M20 Steel Grade = Fe 415 Clear cover of bottom slab =50 mm

Copyright ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA , United States.

Transcription:

REPORT ON GEO-TECHNICAL INVESTIGATION FOR THE PROPOSED BLOCK-7 SUB-STATION SY NO-225, NEAR RAYACHERLU VILLAGE CLIENT: KARNATAKA SOLAR POWER DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION BANGALORE 0

GEO-TECHNICAL INVESTIGATION FOR THE PROPOSED BLOCK-7 SUB-STATION SY NO-225, NEAR RAYACHERLU VILLAGE CONTENTS PAGE NO 1.0 INTRODUCTION 02 2.0 SCOPE OF THE WORK 02 3.0 FIELD AND LABORATORY INVESTIGATION 02 3.1 Boring and Sampling 03 3.2 Field Investigations 03 3.3 Laboratory investigations 03 4.0 TEST RESULTS 04 5.0 CONCLUSIONS 05 6.0 RECOMMENDATIONS 05 6.1 Type of Foundation 05 6.2 Depth of Foundation 05 6.3 Safe Bearing Pressure 05 6.4 Precautions 06 BORE HOLE LOCATION MAP 07 LABORATORY TEST RESULTS 08 BORE LOGS 11 APPENDIX 16 1

GEO-TECHNICAL INVESTIGATION FOR THE PROPOSED BLOCK-7 SUB-STATION SY NO-225, NEAR RAYACHERLU VILLAGE 1.0 INTRODUCTION Mr. KARNATAKA SOLAR POWER DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION BANGALORE to carry out the geotechnical investigation work for the proposed construction of Solar Power Plant at Block-7,sy No-225,near RAYACHERLU village. This report consists of the details about the various field tests and laboratory tests performed to evaluate the Geotechnical characteristics of the site and the recommendations made based on the results of the tests. The primary objectives of this investigation are 1. To ascertain the nature of the sub soil strata at the site through field and laboratory testing, 2. To locate the ground water table if encountered within the depth of exploration, 3. To obtain soil data required for assessing the allowable bearing pressure and for making the choice of type of foundation as well for the analysis and design of safe and economic foundations 2.0 SCOPE OF THE WORK The scope of work involves conducting both field tests and laboratory tests, the data obtained by which is used for the characterization of the soil, estimation of safe bearing capacity which is required for carrying out analysis and design of foundations and also recommend or suggest treatment methods where required. 3.0 FIELD AND LABORATORY INVESTIGATIONS This consists of the following i. Visual and physical observation of soil and location survey ii. Drilling 4 bore holes using auger boring up to 6m depth or refusal strata whichever is earlier 2

iii. Conducting Standard penetration test (SPT) in soil at every 1.5m depth or where ever strata changes up to 6m depth or refusal strata iv. Collecting undisturbed and Representative samples in each of the strata for the laboratory tests v. Conducting suitable laboratory tests on Soil samples to determine Index and Engineering properties. 3.1 Boring and Sampling 150mm diameter boring was carried out in accordance with IS: 1892:- 1979 Code of Practice for sub-surface investigation of foundation (1992) using auger boring at 4 different locations. The bore holes locations are shown in figure1. Representative / Undisturbed samples were collected at different depth as the bore holes were sunk. The undisturbed samples were collected at an interval of 1.5m or at every change in strata, whichever occurred earlier. The samples collected were used for different laboratory test. 3.2 Field Investigations Standard Penetration Test The standard penetration tests were conducted at relevant depths within the boreholes to determine the penetration resistance value (N) as per IS 2131-1981. In this method, a standard split tube sampler (50.8 mm OD and 35 mm ID) is driven by dropping a 65 kg hammer on top of the driving collar with a free fall of 750mm. The length of the sampler is 600mm. The sampler is first driven through 150mm as a seating drive. It is further driven through 300mm. The number of blows required to drive the sampler for 300mm beyond the seating drive is recorded as the penetration resistance value N. Refusal is said to have been reached when the sampler penetration is less than 150mm for 50 blows or 300mm for 100 blows 3.3 Laboratory Investigations Laboratory test were performed to evaluate both index and engineering properties of the soil samples collected during boring. All the tests are performed as per IS recommendations. Table 1 represents the Indian Standard Codes followed for the testing of Soil Samples. 3

Table: 1 Indian Standard Codes followed Sl. No 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Type of Test Grain size analysis Liquid limit and Plastic limit test Natural water content Field density Specific Gravity Tri-axial compression test (Quick test) Proctor density test California bearing ratio test IS Code IS-2720 (Part4) -1985 IS-2720 (Part4) -1985 IS-2720 (Part2) -1973 IS-2720 (Part10) -1993 IS-2720 (Part3) -1985 Sec1,2-1980 IS-2720 (Part11) -1993 IS-2720 (Part17)-1980 IS-2720(Part 16)-1987 The results of these laboratory tests are presented in Table 3 to Table 5 4.0 TEST RESULTS Based on the visual observations and the laboratory tests carried out on soil samples procured from bore holes at four locations, the sub soil strata is classified as follows and laboratory test results are presented in table3 and table4 SUB SOIL PROFILE The sub soil strata in general consist of brownish silty sand up to 1.5m from the existing ground; extended by yellowish white moderately disintegrated weathered rock up to termination depth. The bore holes BH-1 was terminated at 1.7m depth and BH-2, BH-3, BH-4 were terminated at 1.5m depth respectively from the existing ground surface. 5.0CONCLUSIONS The following conclusions are made based on field and laboratory investigations. 1. The SPT values indicate that the soil strata up to termination depth are very dense in nature up to termination depth. 2. The clay/silt present in the soil is found to be low compressible in nature. 4

6. RECOMMENDATIONS The following recommendations are made based on the detailed investigation conducted and the conclusions drawn. The recommendations are restricted to the location around the investigation points only. 6.1. TYPE OF FOUNDATION The structure shall be founded on shallow foundations. This may be either isolated footings or combined footing. For load bearing walls continuous footing shall be employed 6.2. DEPTH OF FOUNDATION The foundation for the proposed structure shall be taken to a minimum depth of 1.5m below the natural ground level. 6.3 SAFE BEARING CAPACITY Based on the settlement criterion the allowable bearing pressure and based on the shear criterion the SBC has been worked out as per IS 6403-1982. Individual footing/combined footing may be designed using the recommended safe bearing capacity, with factor of safety of 3.0, against shear failure and for an allowable settlement of 25mm (specimen calculations for the same has been presented in the appendix) Depth of foundation from ground level m TABLE: 2 Recommended Safe Bearing Capacity Safe Bearing Capacity kn/m 2 Safe Bearing Capacity T/m 2 1.5 250 25 5

6.4. PRECAUTIONS 1. All depth of foundations are given with respect to top of existing ground level. If any site leveling and grading takes place, it is important that foundation trenches in areas of fill"(if any) be taken to the specified depth below the top of existing ground level. 2. The bottom of foundation shall be properly levelled and well compacted before the construction of foundation work is taken up 3. If any loose pockets of soil wherever encountered should be completely removed and back filled with well compacted earth. Thereafter a layer of 40-50 mm size stone aggregate should be rammed into the back filled earth. A levelling course of lean concrete should then be laid over the aggregate course and construction of foundation can be taken up subsequently. 4. The columns should be tied with R.C.C beam at plinth level. 6

7

TABLE: 3 ATTERBERG S LIMITS AND GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION Bore Atterberg s limits, Depth, Grain Size Distribution, % Hole % m No Liquid Plastic Clay & Sand Gravel Limit Limit Silt BH-1 1.0 21 NP 21 79 BH-2 1.5 22 12 25 75 BH-3 1.5 25 13 22 78 BH-4 1.5 25 12 23 77 Bore Hole No TABLE: 4 SHEAR STRENGTH PARAMETERS Depth, m Density, kn/m 2 Water content, % Shear Parameters Angle of internal friction, Ø in degrees Cohesion, kn/m 2 BH-1 1.0 18.0 15 02 25 BH-2 1.5 18.1 14 03 27 BH-3 1.5 18.3 15 26 BH-4 1.5 18.0 12 02 25 8

TABLE: 5 UNCONFINED COMPRESSION TEST, SPECIFIC GRAVITY, SHRINKAGE LIMIT TEST B.H. NO. DEPTH (m) SPECIFIC GRAVITY (G) MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY (kn/m 3 ) OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT (%) C.B.R (%) 1 0.5 2.79 18.5 16 09 2 0.5 2.80 18.6 16 10 3 0.5 2.80 18.7 17 08 4 0.5 2.76 18.8 16 09 9

BORE LOGS 10

BORE HOLE NUMBER BH: 1 Termination Depth: 1.7m Type of Boring: Auger Sampler used: Shell tube Diameter of Boring: 150mm Inclination : Vertical DESCRIPTION Thickness of Strata Legend Depth m 0 Corrected N-Value Sample Type No. Remarks Brownish silty sand Yellowish white moderately disintegrated weathered rock 1.5 0.2 0.5 1.0 1.5 1.7 RS DS UDS SPT Ground water table was not encountered during investigation Fig.2.Bore log at BH: 1 RS=Refusal strata 11

BORE HOLE NUMBER BH: 2 Termination Depth: 1.5m Type of Boring: Auger Sampler used: Shell tube Diameter of Boring: 150mm Inclination : Vertical DESCRIPTION Thickness of Strata Legend Depth m 0 Corrected N-Value Sample Type No. Remarks Brownish silty sand 1.5 0.5 1.5 RS DS SPT Ground water table was not encountered during investigation Fig.3.Bore log at BH: 2 RS=Refusal strata 12

BORE HOLE NUMBER BH: 3 Termination Depth: 1.5m Type of Boring: Auger Sampler used: Shell tube Diameter of Boring: 150mm Inclination : Vertical DESCRIPTION Thickness of Strata Legend Depth m 0 Corrected N-Value Sample Type No. Remarks Brownish silty sand 1.5 0.5 1.5 RS DS SPT Ground water table was not encountered during investigation Fig.4.Bore log at BH: 3 RS=Refusal strata 13

BORE HOLE NUMBER BH: 4 Termination Depth: 1.5m Type of Boring: Auger Sampler used: Shell tube Diameter of Boring: 150mm Inclination : Vertical DESCRIPTION Thickness of Strata Legend Depth m 0 Corrected N-Value Sample Type No. Remarks Brownish silty sand 1.5 0.5 1.5 RS DS SPT Ground water table was not encountered during investigation Fig.5.Bore log at BH: 4 RS=Refusal strata 14

APPENDIX SAFE BEARING PRESSURE BASED ON SETTLEMENT CRITERIA (25 mm SETTLEMENT) Refer bore hole No 2: Proposing B = 2.0m and D f =1.5m from natural ground level and N=50 q ns = 0.049 N R d1 Sa If B< 1.20m q ns = 0.032 N R d2 (B+0.30)/B)2 Sa If B> 1.20m q ns = Safe bearing pressure in t/m 2 Sa = Permissible settlement = 25mm R d1 = Depth factor = (1+0.2D/B)<1.20 R d2 = Depth factor = (1+0.33D/B)<1.33 For a width B= 2.0m Depth of footing D f = 2.0m N =50 Rd2 = 1.25 q ns = 0.032 x 50x 1.25 x (2+0.30)/2) 2 x 25 q ns = 66.12T/m 2 or 661.25 kn/m 2 SBC OF SOIL BASED ON SHEAR CRITERIA, I.S: 6403-1981 Bore hole No2: Proposing B = 1.0m and D f =1.5m from natural ground level Taking C=kN/m 2, Ø = 27 0, γ = 18.1kN/m 3 B= 1.0m. D f = 1.5m, For Ø = 27 0 Nc = 26.37, Nq = 15.3, Nr = 17.79, s c =1.3, s q =1.2, s r =0.8, d c =1.39, d q =d r =1.19 q safe = c Nc s c d c + r D f (Nq-1) s q d q + 0.5 r B Nr s r d r + r D f Fs=3 q safe = 261.98kN/m 2 Adopt 250kN/m 2 or 25.0T/m 2 for conservative design. PREMIERE ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, BANGALORE 15