SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH

Similar documents
NONCOMPLIANCE. 1. Overview

CUNY HRPP Policy: Suspension or Termination of Human Subject Research

Yale University Human Research Protection Program

Institutional Review Board Standard Operating Procedure. Suspension and Termination of IRB Approval

UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD CONTINUING REVIEW AND REAPPROVAL OF RESEARCH

Procedure Department: HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTIONS PROGRAM Policy Number: II.B.1

UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD CONTINUING REVIEW OF RESEARCH

SOP 407: PROTOCOL DEVIATIONS AND UNANTICIPATED PROBLEMS

Wayne State University Institutional Review Board

Reporting an Unanticipated Problem Involving Risks to Subjects or Others (UPIRTSO) to the IRB

the HRPP Director will prepare a draft report within three (3) workdays after the IRB meeting at which the determination occurred.

Michigan State University Human Research Protection Program

Standard Operating Policy and Procedures (SOPP) 3:

INTRA-INSTITUTIONAL COMMUNICATION

SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTION PROGRAM STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES

University of Pennsylvania Institutional Review Board. Reliance Agreement Guidance: Post-Approval Submissions

Administrative Hold, Suspension, or Termination of IRB Approval

CONTINUING REVIEW OF APPROVED IRB PROTOCOLS

Children s Hospital of Philadelphia Committees for the Protection of Human Subjects Policies and Procedures Continuing Review of Approved Research

CONTINUING REVIEW 3/7/2016

SOP 801: Investigator Qualifications and Responsibilities

SOP #2-2 Version #1 Date First Effective: December 14, Page 1 of 6

Human Research Protection Program Policy

CONTINUING REVIEW CRITERIA FOR RENEWAL

Lapse in IRB Approval

I. Summary. II. Responsibilities

Issue in IRB Approvals:

OHRP Guidance on Written IRB Procedures

Tuesday, May 15, Please be sure to sign in and take copies of each handout.

AMENDMENTS TO PREVIOUSLY APPROVED RESEARCH 3/01/2016

Signature Date Date First Effective: Signature Date Revision Date:

To assure knowledge and compliance by documenting the annual administrative review and continuing IRB review of non-exempt projects for the IRB.

University of Iowa External/Central IRB Reliance Process Standard Operating Procedure (SOP)

Baptist Health Institutional Review Board. Study Closure Report (Expedited Review) IRB #: Study Title:

COMPLIANCE MONITORING

Supersedes Document Dated: 7/7/11. SOP: RR 401 Version No.: 07 Version Date: 9/8/15 EXPEDITED REVIEW 1. POLICY

CONTINUING REVIEW CRITERIA FOR RENEWAL

UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD PROCEDURES FOR FULL BOARD REVIEW

EXPEDITED REVIEW. Terms used in this policy, but not defined herein shall have the meanings set forth in the Glossary.

IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY Institutional Review Board. Policy on IRB Review of Protocol Deviations and Noncompliance for Non-exempt Research

Ceded IRB Review. The project involves prisoners or other vulnerable populations that require special considerations.

To assure knowledge and compliance by documenting the continuing review procedure of approved projects for the IRB.

Section 8. Continuing Review of Ongoing IRB-Approved Research (Revised 7/1/10)

IRB-REQUIRED INVESTIGATOR ACTIONS

Chapter 4 Institutional Review Board (IRB) Roles and Authorities

Cayuse IRB Policy and Procedure Manual

The Children s Hospital of Philadelphia Committee for the Protection of Human Subjects Policies and Procedures. Cooperative Agreements

Florida State University IRB Standard Operational Procedures

Initial Review. Approved By: Michele Kennett, JD, MSN, LLM Associate Vice Chancellor for Research. Table of Contents

Illinois Institute of Technology Institutional Review Board Handbook of Procedures for the Protection of Human Research Subjects

Guidance for IRBs, Clinical Investigators, and Sponsors IRB Continuing Review after Clinical Investigation Approval

7.0 DEVIATION and EXCEPTION of a PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PROTOCOL

Review of Research by the Convened IRB

SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTION PROGRAM STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES 02 06/30/10 08/01/07 1 OF 6

Investigator Manual. If you have questions about whether an activity requires IRB review, contact the IRB Office.

IRB MEETING ADMINISTRATION

Independent Ethics Committees

Human Subjects in Research Review and Monitoring Form. Not applicable

Yale University Institutional Review Boards

Collaborative Research

I. Summary. II. Responsibilities

INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD (IRB) PROCEDURES

UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA Institutional Review Board

CUNY HRPP Procedures: Multisite Non-Exempt Human Subjects Research

Effective Date: January 16, 2012 Policy Number: Appendix II. Revised Date: November 2, 2015 Oversight Level: Corporate

RESEARCH SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

Oklahoma State University Institutional Review Board Standard Operating Procedures

IRB Chair Responsibilities

SOP 903: HRPP AND NON-COMPLIANCE

Institutional Review Board (IRB) Policies and Procedures Manual

Effective Date Revisions Date Review by the Convened Institutional Review Board

2.0 Institutional Review Board

University of Cincinnati. Radiation Safety Committee Operations Guidelines Statement of Policy (RSC Guidelines) RSC Guidelines (revision 5)

INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD POLICY

Effective Date: January 16, 2012 Policy Number: MHC_RP0107. Revised Date: November 2, 2015 Oversight Level: Corporate

Ceded IRB Review. The University of Arizona has standing agreements in place for the following entities regarding ceded IRB review:

Research Involving Human Subjects: AA 110.7

POLICY NO EXEMPT RESEARCH... 4 POLICY NO DISCLOSURE OF RESEARCH LAB TEST RESULTS... 5

Human Research Protections Program Medical College of Wisconsin and Froedtert Memorial Lutheran Hospital

Study Management SM STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR Interactions with the Institutional Review Board (IRB)

What s New in GCP? FDA, OHRP Issue Harmonized Guidance on Transferring IRB Oversight of Clinical Studies

University of Wisconsin Colleges Administrative Policy #56 NON-COMPLIANCE IN HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH

INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD (IRB) PROCEDURES

External IRB Instructions for the Registration Pathway in OSIRIS

AUTHORITY AND PURPOSE

University of Pennsylvania Institutional Review Board. Reliance Agreement Guidance: Penn as Central IRB FAQ

21 CFR Part 56 - Institutional Review Boards

SOP 5.06 Full Committee Review: Initial IRB Review

IRB COMPOSITION AND IRB MEMBER ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES

Tarleton State University

Minot State University Institutional Review Board ANNUAL UPDATE/REVISION/PROJECT COMPLETION REPORT

DOCUMENTATION OF IRB DISCUSSIONS AND DECISIONS ( IRB MINUTES)

EMERGENCY USE 03/02/2016

INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD MANUAL: PURPOSE and POLICIES.

Date Effective 4/21/2008 Identification

Office of the Vice President for Research

Human Research Protection Program. Institutional Review Board

Version 1. Submission Guide and Policies

I. Introduction. Institutional Authority Under Which the IRB is Established and Empowered (45 CFR )(21 CFR (a))

Submitting Continuing Reviews and/or Amendments to the IRB

Transcription:

P&P: RR 409 Version No:1.2 Effective Date: 11/20/2013 SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH Supercedes: CPHS Policies and Procedures 11/28/2000 1. POLICY The IRB shall have authority to suspend or terminate approved human subjects research that is not being conducted in accordance with the IRB s requirements or that has been associated with unexpected serious harm to subjects. In addition, the IRB has the authority to suspend or terminate any human subjects research activity that that has not been reviewed and approved or determined exempt by the IRB (see RR410 Noncompliance). Any suspension or termination of approval shall include a statement of the reasons for the IRB s action. Suspensions or terminations shall be reported in writing promptly to all appropriate parties as listed under the Responsibilities section of this policy. Although only the procedures for the IRB suspending or terminating a protocol are discussed in this document, the IO also has the authority to not approve research approved by the IRB and to suspend or terminate research protocols for institutional reasons. Specific Policies 1.1 Definitions 1.1.1 Suspension. All project activities must cease until any pending issues can be resolved satisfactorily. Suspended studies are still approved, but in a hold status until the pending issues can be resolved. 1.1.2 Termination. The study is no longer approved. All project activities must cease immediately, including data analysis and any resulting data or analysis is null and void. A study may be terminated by the IRB or by the sponsor for administrative, regulatory or other reasons (such as initial study results). Regardless of the reason, terminated studies are not considered completed. 1.1.3 Closure. This is an administrative status whereby a previously approved protocol s expiration date has passed and an investigator has not submitted a renewal, or the investigator has submitted a study closure request. The IRB assumes that no human subject research activities are ongoing and, for administrative record keeping, the study record is closed. 1.2 Reasons for Suspension/Termination The IRB shall have authority to suspend or terminate approval of research that is not being conducted in accordance with federal and state regulations, University of California Office of the President or UC Berkeley policy, or IRB requirements, or research that has been associated with unexpected serious harm to subjects (45 CFR 46.113). A research project may be suspended or terminated for a variety of reasons, including but not limited to: UC Berkeley HRPP RR409 Page 1 of 5 Last Revised 11-20-13

A. Serious adverse event(s) and unanticipated problem(s) B. Detrimental change in the risk-benefit ratio of the study C. Conduct of research activities without prior IRB approval D. Failure to obtain appropriate consent E. Failure of investigators to complete required training F. Other noncompliance issues 1.3 Authorities 1.3.1 The IRB is authorized to suspend or terminate research protocols. 1.3.2 The IRB Chair (or his/her designee - e.g. Vice Chair) is authorized to suspend research protocols in emergency situations (i.e., when the rights, safety, or welfare of subjects are in immediate jeopardy). 1.4 Suspension and Termination Process and Notification 1.4.1 When potential cause for further investigation is demonstrated, an inquiry into the specific circumstances giving rise to concern with a specific protocol will be conducted. The initial inquiry and investigation procedures are described in RR 410 Noncompliance or as described in RR 408 Unanticipated Problems and Adverse Event Reporting depending on the nature of the initiating incident. If a protocol is determined to be in noncompliance or a detrimental change in the risk/benefit occurs, further action will be taken by the IRB. 1.4.2 In most cases, the IRB will review the circumstances of the case and make a determination of suspension or need for termination. Other IRB members may be consulted as needed in the decision making process leading up to bringing the issue to the full committee. 1.4.3 In emergency situations, the IRB Chair in consultation with an IRB Vice Chair, the Director of OPHS or IRB Manager or IRB Administrator will make a determination of the need to suspend or terminate a study immediately. 1.4.4 The IRB Chair (or his or her designee) will write a letter that includes the following: A. a description of the event B. the determination of the IRB (i.e., suspension, termination) C. justification for the determination D. requirements of the investigator (e.g., cease all data collection) The letter will be forwarded to the Investigator, Investigator s Faculty Advisor (if applicable), Investigator s Department Head, IO, OPHS Director, any Sponsor(s), and applicable federal agencies (e.g., FDA, OHRP). A copy of the form is filed with the protocol s IRB file. 1.4.5 The Lead Investigator is responsible for notifying (in a timely manner) all coinvestigators, key personnel, and other research staff associated with the UC Berkeley HRPP RR409 Page 2 of 5 Last Revised 11-20-13

protocol as well as any subcontract grantees if the protocol has been suspended or terminated. 1.5 Participant Involvement in Suspended or Terminated Protocols 1.5.1 When a protocol is suspended or terminated, the Investigator must stop all activity on the protocol, including subject recruitment and enrollment, procedures, and analysis and/or publication of existing data. 1.5.2 When the suspension or termination of a research protocol involves the withdrawal of current participants from the research, the Investigator will be required to: A. inform enrolled participants that the study has been suspended or terminated; and, B. develop procedures for withdrawal that protect the rights, safety, and welfare of participants, and describe those procedures to participants. 1.5.3 In certain circumstances, project activities may continue if stopping study procedures/treatment will adversely affect the welfare of a subject. If the suspension or termination of a research protocol does involve the withdrawal of current participants from the research, the Investigator will be required to: A. notify the OPHS immediately of the need to continue any procedures/treatment; B. inform enrolled participants that the study has been suspended or terminated; and, C. report any serious adverse events or unanticipated problems involving risks to participants to the IRB. 1.6 Reinstatement of Suspended or Terminated Protocols 1.6.1 Suspended Studies. To reinstate a project that has been suspended, the investigator must resolve satisfactorily any pending issues as required by the IRB. After one year of suspension or the expiration date of the study (whichever comes first), if adequate progress has not been made on the pending issues then the IRB will administratively close the study protocol. To reinstate a project that has been suspended the investigator must contact the OPHS in writing within 30 days of the suspension. The investigator must address the following in a letter: A. Reason for requesting the study be reinstated. B. Short summary of the purpose of the study and intended objectives/outcomes. This may be incorporated into the protocol narrative noting any changes, revisions or clarifications. C. Description of how the study has changed, if any, since initial approval using the appropriate Amendment form and procedure for identifying changes in the protocol narrative. UC Berkeley HRPP RR409 Page 3 of 5 Last Revised 11-20-13

2. SCOPE D. Summary of status of the study, including: (1) how many subjects were enrolled; (2) at what point in the treatment/procedures were the subjects at the time of suspension; (3) any adverse events or amendments since last continuing review, including a description of each; (4) any additional relevant information. E. Documented plan to ensure that reason for suspension will not happen again and that the study will be in compliance with all applicable laws and regulations F. Anticipated enrollment, if the study is reactivated G. In the case that IRB-approval of a protocol is reinstated, the IRB may require that subjects who were previously enrolled be re-consented. 1.6.2 Terminated Studies. Terminated studies may be reinstated or reactivated with appropriate modifications to address the reason(s) the study was terminated. Investigators will need to submit a completely new application if they wish to resume a terminated study. These policies and procedures apply to all human subjects research conducted by investigators affiliated with UC Berkeley, regardless of whether the protocol was ever submitted, reviewed, or approved by the IRB or determined to be exempt. 3. RESPONSIBILITY IRB Chair is responsible for authorizing protocol suspensions and bringing terminations to the IRB. He or she is also responsible for making suspension or termination determinations in emergency situations. OPHS Director and/or any OPHS staff member is responsible for receiving reports of noncompliance, unanticipated problems involving risks to subjects and/or serious adverse events, or other information relative to Section 1.2 above and reporting it to the OPHS Director and IRB Chair. IRB Chair and OPHS Director are responsible for ensuring that protocol suspensions and terminations are reported to appropriate individuals ( e.g. Institutional Official) and organizations (e.g. department or agency heads, OHRP, sponsor) in a timely manner (e.g. initial verbal reports -as needed - followed by written notification). The Principal Investigator (PI) is responsible for ensuring prompt reporting of protocol suspensions and terminations to the FDA for studies involving FDA-regulated drugs, devices, and biologics. The PI must also inform CPHS/OPHS of any suspensions or terminations that are determined outside of UCB s IRB. UC Berkeley HRPP RR409 Page 4 of 5 Last Revised 11-20-13

OPHS Director or his/her designee is responsible for overseeing the process by which protocols that have not been updated, reviewed and approved with proper continuing review paperwork are identified and administratively closed. 4. PROCESS OVERVIEW Suspensions or Terminations for Cause When the IRB receives reports of circumstances which may affect the rights, safety, or welfare of human research participants, or reports of research not being conducted in accordance with federal or state regulations, University policy, or IRB stipulations, the IRB will make a determination as to whether the protocol should be suspended or terminated. Under normal circumstances and when the severity of the event in terms of risks to subjects is low (e.g., failure of the LI to complete required training), the determination will be made at the next regularly-scheduled IRB meeting. The IRB Chair may convene an ad hoc committee to meet prior to the next convened IRB meeting to review the case and make a determination of suspension or termination (or no action) if he or she feels it is warranted. In addition, the incident may be referred to the full IRB for discussion and resolution. If the severity of the event is deemed to be high (e.g., noncompliance that puts the rights, safety, or welfare of participants at immediate and/or increased risk), the IRB Chair will review the case and can make an interim determination of suspension. In this later case, the full IRB will review the circumstances of the case and make a determination to continue the suspension, terminate the protocol, or reinstate active approval. If a study is suspended or terminated, the IRB Chair (or his or her designee) will notify the Investigator in writing of the suspension or termination. The Investigator must cease all project activities effective from the date of the first notice of the suspension or termination. Administrative Study Closure Protocols for which an investigator has requested study closure will be administratively closed by OPHS staff. Protocols that have expired and for which no continuing review application has been received by OPHS will automatically be closed 6 months after the expiration date. All human subjects research must have ceased effective the day of expiration or the day of the study closure, whichever comes first. 5. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS AND GUIDELINES 45 CFR 46.113, 45 CFR 46.109(e) 21 CFR 56.113 UC Berkeley HRPP RR409 Page 5 of 5 Last Revised 11-20-13