lowercase tod Rail~Volution October 22, 2013 Melanie Hare

Similar documents
Access BART: TOD and Improved Connections. October 29, 2008

Transportation Master Plan Advisory Task Force

METRO RTA TRANSIT MASTER PLAN. May 25-26, 2011

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... vii 1 STUDY OVERVIEW Study Scope Study Area Study Objectives

TRANSPORTATION TRAINING TOPICS. April 6, 2010

Capital and Strategic Planning Committee. Item III - B. April 12, WMATA s Transit-Oriented Development Objectives

In station areas, new pedestrian links can increase network connectivity and provide direct access to stations.

Good TOD. July 7, 2016 SPUR

Key objectives of the survey were to gain a better understanding of:

ATTACHMENT 4 - TDM Checklist. TDM Checklist Overview

Dumbarton Transportation Corridor Study. San Francisco Bay ITE November 2016

Transportation, Parking & Roads

FROM: CITY MANAGER DEPARTMENT: PLANNING AND COMMUNITY ENVIRONMENT DATE: OCTOBER 4, 2004 CMR:432:04

JOINT PARTNERSHIPS: Working Together To Support Light Rail in Santa Monica

DON MILLS-EGLINTON Mobility Hub Profile

Beyond First First Last Last Mile Strategies. APA National Conference April 3, 2016 Chelsea Richer, AICP Fehr & Peers

NEWMARKET CENTRE Mobility Hub Profile

2045 Long Range Transportation Plan. Summary of Draft

West Village Mobility & Integration

Markham Sports, Entertainment and Cultural Centre Transportation Overview

Roads and Vehicular Traffic Design Principles. Roads and Vehicular Traffic Recommendations

MEETING Agenda. Introductions. Project Overview. Key Study Components. Alternative Station Concepts. Preferred Station Concept. Next Steps.

Transportation-Demand Management Community Presentation

Bus Rapid Transit Plans

WELCOME. City of Greater Sudbury. Transportation Demand Management Plan

San Jose Transportation Policy

Dear City Council Members,

DON MILLS-SHEPPARD Mobility Hub Profile

El Camino Real Bus Rapid Transit Conceptual Engineering. Los Altos Council Workshop January 24, 2012

ROUTES 55 / 42 / 676 BUS RAPID TRANSIT LOCALLY PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE

ROADSOADS CONGESTION HAMPTON SYSTEMYSTEM MANAGEMENT. Part II Roadway Congestion Analysis Mitigation Strategies and Evaluation

City of Hamilton s Transportation Master Plan (TMP) Public Consultation 3 December 2015

modes, the increased roadway capacity is the implied solution, which, in turn, has been shown to lead to more driving (induced demand).

A Selection Approach for BRT Parking Lots Nicolls Road Corridor Parking Study

First and Last Mile Plan. April 2016

The Nexus between Transportation Demand Your sub title Management (TDM), Transit Station Access, and Internal Station Circulation

CONNECTING PEOPLE TO PLACES

Chapter 5 Future Transportation

Ann Arbor Downtown Street Plan

Metropolitan Council Transportation Committee

Performance Criteria for 2035 Long Range Transportation Plan

South King County High-Capacity Transit Corridor Study

Welcome. Background. Goals. Vision

APPENDIX A LITERATURE REVIEW AND SUMMARY OF STAKEHOLDER INTERVIEWS

Setting the Standard: An Introduction to Bicycle Accessibility to Transit Agencies

T1-A - Service Reduction (Re-sizing)

El Camino Real. Dear Transit, You Complete me. Love, The Street. Kevin Connolly Transit Planning Manager, Valley Transportation Authority

Pocatello Regional Transit Master Transit Plan Draft Recommendations

Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Board Action/Information Summary

Making Phoenix Streets Complete. City of Phoenix Complete Streets Initiative

Develop a Multi-Modal Transportation Strategy (Theme 6)

A District Council of the Urban Land Institute

Moving Cambridge. City of Cambridge Transportation Master Plan Public Consultation Centre. March 7, :00 8:00 PM.

North Coast Corridor:

DUNDAS WEST-BLOOR Mobility Hub Profile

Executive Summary Route 30 Corridor Master Plan

How To Encourage More Efficient Transportation in Brazilian Cities

CITY OF COCOA BEACH 2025 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. Section VIII Mobility Element Goals, Objectives, and Policies

Chapter 4 Transportation Strategies to Support Growth

BUS RAPID TRANSIT. A Canadian Perspective. McCormick Rankin International. John Bonsall P.Eng

2015 Florida Main Street Annual Conference. Complete Streets Equal Stronger Main Streets

Project Narrative. Albuquerque, NM. July 31, 2015

NORTH YORK CENTRE Mobility Hub Profile

Seattle Transit Master Plan

Perryville TOD and Greenway Plan

Bus Rapid Transit on Silicon Valley s El Camino Real: Working Together to Create a Grand Boulevard Steven Fisher

Online Open House Survey Report. December 2016

Chapter 7. Transportation. Transportation Road Network Plan Transit Cyclists Pedestrians Multi-Use and Equestrian Trails

1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROBLEM STATEMENT PROJECT PURPOSE AND NEED Study Purpose Study Need... 4

Chapter 2. Bellingham Bicycle Master Plan Chapter 2: Policies and Actions

Transportation Master Plan April 2017 i

SANTA CLARA COUNTYWIDE BICYCLE PLAN August 2008

Vision to Action Community Coalition February 14, 2014 Briefing

REGIONAL PRIORITIES Presentation to the Tampa Bay Regional Collaboration Committee September 10, 2012

Broward Boulevard Gateway Implementation Project, Downtown Walkability Analysis, & Joint Development Initiative (JDI)

Transit Planning at 3 Scales: the Network, Corridor, and Station Levels

Overview: Phase 3 Draft Development and Circulation Plans, White Bear Station

City of Waterloo Complete Streets Policy

Multimodal Approach to Planning & Implementation of Transit Signal Priority within Montgomery County Maryland

CENTRAL AND EAST CORRIDORS

CITY OF BLOOMINGTON COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

City of Novi Non-Motorized Master Plan 2011 Executive Summary

2018 Transportation Survey October 17, Prepared by:

Bicycle Master Plan Goals, Strategies, and Policies

WELCOME TO OPEN HOUSE # 1 June 14, 2017

Corpus Christi Metropolitan Transportation Plan Fiscal Year Introduction:

Bringing Active Transportation and Station Area Plans to Life

Public Consultation Centre For. Transportation Master Plan Update. Information Package

Planning Regionally With Transit

Roanoke Valley TRANSIT VISION PLAN


Transit-Driven Complete Streets

Purpose and Need. Chapter Introduction. 2.2 Project Purpose and Need Project Purpose Project Need

MCTC 2018 RTP SCS and Madera County RIFP Multi-Modal Project Eval Criteria GV13.xlsx

2.0 GOALS, PRINCIPLES, AND POLICIES

VISION Long Range Plan Update Board Workshop. February 10, 2016

THE NEW TOD Design for Active + New Mobility

York Region Population and Employment Growth

Land Use and Transportation Town Hall September 17, 2018

Stakeholder Meeting Handouts. January 2013

Transcription:

lowercase tod Rail~Volution October 22, 2013 Melanie Hare mhare@urbanstrategies.com

overview 1 the challenge 2 on the ground 3 strategies

the challenge suburban cities planning for re-urbanization and increased transit while struggling with auto-oriented culture and existing built form

Less than optimal ridership projections

TOD here...

TOD here? Pickering suburban town centre leveraging transit as a critical lever to urbanization

TOD here? Brampton BRT to transform a suburban corridor

TOD here? Waterloo Introducing phased RT to a mid-sized but fast growing region

TOD here? Saint Paul, MN Revitalizing an auto oriented corridor

TOD here? Minneapolis, MN Introducing LRT in suburban employment districts

challenges Not at the TOD tipping point from a market, culture or congestion level Urban structure is not designed to allow for local connectivity Hostile pedestrian environments where transit can only be accommodated by adding vehicular lanes TOD is not part of the planning or development culture Considered as only viable as a long term prospect and to start then

strategies Start now + make every step count toward transformation Demonstrate change Change the planning and development model Address parking upfront Facilitate concurrent investment in development and transit Employment areas require tailored strategies Make it an experience; more than a way to get somewhere

1 Start Now: make every step count Target Site, Saint Paul

Start Now: including short term uses Target Site, Saint Paul

Start Now: including short term uses Pickering Town Centre, Pickering

Start Now: including short term uses Pickering Town Centre, Pickering

2 Demonstrate Change: Transformation over time Hespeler Road, Region of Waterloo

3 Shaping New Centres Change the development model: Allowing for change over time

Pickering Town Centre Change the development model: Reintroducing connectivity Pickering Suburban town centre 300m min intersection spacing 0.22 intersections per hectare Reurbanizing Mobility Hub 100m min intersection spacing 0.51 min intersection spacing

Start Now: including short-term uses 4 Address Parking Upfront EMPAC development, Pickering

5 Facilitate development with transit Community Building Strategy, Waterloo

6 Employment areas require tailored Strategies: making it easier to get to work Supporting existing employment centres with tailored services Opus Campus Burlington, Minneapolis Vermont

Shaping New Centres 7 Make it an experience Brampton s Zum

in conclusion Will take time so set some priorities and get started Build the ridership abrt, BRT, LRT.. In the 21C, mobility choices are a requisite part of city building Celebrate success and recognize the small steps

Lowercase TOD: Maximizing Existing Assets to Achieve Community Goals Chris Sandvig Regional Policy Director Pittsburgh Community Reinvestment Group s GoBurgh Initiative Rail~Volution 2013 Seattle, WA

Pittsburgh Community Reinvestment Group Incorporated 1988 Focus primarily on: Transit & Transit-Oriented Development Fair lending practices Neighborhood access to capital Capacity of local groups and actors Vacant property reclamation and repurposing Public safety Neighborhood revitalization

What brought PCRG to transportation? 2009 PCRG TOD Symposium Member demand Lack of organized, informed, community voice Neighborhood revitalization s reliance on transit Disconnected legacy system

Transit-Oriented Development in Pittsburgh, ca. 1950 at noon ss

While Pittsburgh has gone from this to this

it was far from painless.

Our comeback has a lot to do with building on our existing assets.

Our comeback has a lot to do with building on our assets.

We applied this philosophy to our transitoriented development

We connect many jobs to transit. Jobs Served by Fixed-Guideway Transit, 2008 (includes proposed Oakland- Downtown corridor) Region Jobs Jobs Near Transit % Allegheny County 680,135 308,838 45% MSA (7-Counties) 1,084,903 308,838 28% SPC (10-Counties) 1,161,395 308,838 27% Source: LEHD 2008, CTOD 2010

But communities are disconnected, divided.

Leverage transit assets Do more with less Make strategic regional changes to support TOD Minimize system operational impacts 11/7/2013 37

The Typology prioritizes implementation strategies Building Capacity of Local TOD Champions Planning/ Visioning Station Area Infrastructure (bike/ped, stormwater) Community and Economic Revitalization Catalytic Development Infill & Enhance Catalyze Connect Plan & Partner Educate & Envision

1. Encourage transit that supports TOD

2. New funding for small- to mid-sized infrastructure

3. Stable funding for planning, visioning

4. Build capacity at the local scale Wilkinsburg CDC

5. Use typology approach in regional efforts

Where does PCRG go from here? Working with regional partners on compact community reinvestment strategies Develop corridor working groups Build member capacity Convergence of PCRG functional areas for connected, strategic, place-based revitalization Advocacy for new sources of funding Strengthening partnerships with developers, local government, financial partners

E. Busway Ecosystem Project

Join us online, share your thoughts. @transityes facebook.com/transityes

North Bayshore Transportation Strategy Jim Lightbody City of Mountain View, CA

The Challenge Silicon Valley is back North Bayshore area of MountainView (home to Google, Intuit, others) City of Mtn View General Plan revised to increase density in support of employment growth Limited road access (three entry points) and no expansion plans Two miles from Caltrain Commuter Rail and VTA light rail stations

Intuit Google LinkedIn Microsoft NASA / Ames Caltrain Light Rail

The Challenge City plan (supported by employers) is to reduce Single-Occupant Vehicle commutes to 45% 70% 60% 50% Single-Occupant Vehicle TDM / Ridesharing Transit - Company Bus Transit - VTA and Caltrain Active Transportation 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Existing 2030 GP

Is It Achievable? Potentially, due to: Unprecedented employer commitment to substantial commute services Millennial Generation s embrace of transit and bikes New options powered by smart phone aps (bikesharing, car-sharing)

The Big Picture Public private partnerships with strong role for Transportation Management Association Multiple, reinforcing strategies Fully utilize latest information sharing technology

The Strategies Employer-Operated Commuter Buses Long trips (25-50+ miles); high quality (e.g. wi-fi) Google = 100+ exclusive bus fleet Shared systems (RidePal) Expected to continue serving at least 20% of commuters

The Strategies Bicycle Commute Improved infrastructure Company incentives Increase to 10% of commuters

The Strategies TDM Programs Includes traditional carpool programs, telecommuting and parking management Take advantage of planned Express Lanes (HOT Lanes) Continue to serve 10% of commuters

The Strategies Rail Connections ( Last Mile ) Caltrain electrification service increase Light rail express trains to South Bay BART extension Grow to serve 15% of commuters

NASA / Ames

Visions for the Last Mile Technology Trail Cycletrack Freeway Crossing Direct Station Access

Shuttle Up High-capacity, high-tech Bus lanes and priority Visions for the Last Mile

Visions for the Last Mile Let s Share Bike-sharing One-way Car-sharing On Demand Ridesharing

Visions for the Last Mile PRT Anyone? Medium capacity guideway Autonomous vehicles?