MORE CONNECTIONS. Redesigning routes for the future of transit in Milwaukee County.

Similar documents
Pocatello Regional Transit Master Transit Plan Draft Recommendations

Afeasibility study to evaluate bus rapid transit service in the East-West Corridor connecting major employment and activity centers between downtown

Planning for Bus Rapid Transit in the Milwaukee Region

Capital and Strategic Planning Committee. Item III - B. April 12, WMATA s Transit-Oriented Development Objectives

WELCOME BUS RAPID TRANSIT PUBLIC MEETING. MEETING TIME: 5 p.m. - 8 p.m.

Purpose and Need. Chapter Introduction. 2.2 Project Purpose and Need Project Purpose Project Need

Bus Rapid Transit ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS. Open House

PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION PLAN FOR THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN

TRANSIT & NON-MOTORIZED PLAN DRAFT FINAL REPORT Butte County Association of Governments

Regional Transportation Needs Within Southeastern Wisconsin

Calgary Transit Route 302 Southeast BRT Year One Review June

Dear City Council Members,

WHITE PAPER: TRANSIT SERVICE FOR SOUTH SHAGANAPPI

Speaker: Brian Dranzik, Fiscal & Policy Administrator Milwaukee County

Transit Ridership - Why the Decline and How to Increase. Hosted by the. Virginia Transit Association

Arnold Hinojosa

Sacramento Grid 2.0. The Downtown Transportation Study

SANTA CLARA COUNTYWIDE BICYCLE PLAN August 2008

City of Davenport CitiBus Public Transportation Study. April 2015

1999 On-Board Sacramento Regional Transit District Survey

Appendix A-K Public Information Centre 2 Materials

Aurora Corridor to E Line

Typical Rush Hour Commute. PennyforTransportation.com

2011 Countywide Attitudinal and Awareness Survey Results

Steve Feigenbaum Service Planning Manager Katharine Eagan, AICP Chief Operating Officer HART Tampa, Florida

TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.

PURPOSE AND NEED SUMMARY 54% Corridor Need 1. Corridor Need 2. Corridor Need 3. Corridor Need 4. Corridor Need 5

AGENDA. Stakeholder Workshop

Transit Workshop with MPO Board

1/30/2019 DRAFT. January 31, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION

Central Oregon Intergovernmental Council

Metropolitan Council Transportation Committee

Ridership in Virginia by System FY2017

Eliminate on-street parking where it will allow for a dedicated bus only lane %

Presentation of Staff Draft March 18, 2013 COUNTYWIDE TRANSIT CORRIDORS FUNCTIONAL MASTER PLAN

To: Marketing Planning and Legislative Committee Date: October 29, From: Anne Muzzini, Director of Planning & Marketing

Everett Transit Action Plan. Community Open House November 16, 2015

Where We Live and Work Today

Community Task Force July 25, 2017

the Story of the 30s & 70s Bus Lines James Hamre - WMATA

Capital Beltway HOT Lanes - Frequently Asked Questions

2012 Transit Study Randolph County

July 23, Transit Workshop

395 Express Lanes Extension

Bus Rapid Transit Plans

Capital Metro Monthly Ridership Report September 2017 (Fiscal Year-end 2017)

VISION Long Range Plan Update Board Workshop. February 10, 2016

Title VI Fare Change Equity Analysis

METRO Light Rail: Changing Transit Markets in the Phoenix Metropolitan Area

Designing Streets for Transit. Presentation to NACTO Designing Cities Kevin O Malley Managing Deputy Commissioner 10/24/2014

NEED FOR ADDITIONAL FUNDING

PEDESTRIAN ACTION PLAN

TRANSIT SIGNAL PRIORITY The Toronto Experience

Canarsie Tunnel Repairs: Planning Ahead for the Crisis

Kansas City Area Transportation Authority. Downtown Transit Improvement Vision 2/11/15

Philadelphia Bus Network Choices Report

Access BART: TOD and Improved Connections. October 29, 2008

Final Study Recommendations AMES TRANSIT FEASIBILITY STUDY. For Public Review and Comment. October Ames Transit Feasibility Study

Cheryl Thole CUTR/NBRTI, Senior Research Associate Tampa, Florida

Table of Contents COTA 25x25. Table of Tables... v. Table of Figures... v. ES 1. Executive Summary ES 1.1 Initiatives... 1

ORANGE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY. Metrolink Ridership and Revenue Quarterly Report. Staff Report

METRO Now. Transit Leader. One of only four urban. gain bus ridership in Purple and Green Lines. Red Line is one

TRANSIT RIDERSHIP IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CAPITAL PROJECTS OPERATING PLANS - NEXT NETWORK TRANSIT INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

BUILDING THE CASE FOR TRAVEL OPTIONS IN WASHING TON COUNTY. Image: Steve Morgan. Image: Steve Morgan

. ' motion. APPLtlDK.L - L"iLC_t1GLR 201b APPENDIX 7 TECHNICAL MEMOS

Public Bicycle Sharing Scheme

WALKNBIKE DRAFT PLAN NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE

Cycle network linking Wolverhampton city centre and Bilston town centre with employment sites and residential areas:

VISION. Introduction WHAT S INSIDE. One Region, Focusing on Our Future

Previous Transit Studies MTTF MEETING #

MOBILITY WORKSHOP. Joint City Council and Transportation Commission May 5, 2014

National Transport Awards Cambridge Park & Ride

Drivers of Ridership and Revenue

Transit-Driven Complete Streets

Arterial Transitway Corridors Study. Ave

COLUMBUS AVENUE NEIGHBORHOOD TRANSPORTATION STUDY

Intermodal Connections with Light Rail in Phoenix, AZ Wulf Grote, P.E. Director, Planning & Development

BICYCLE SHARING SYSTEM: A PROPOSAL FOR SURAT CITY

HB 2017 Transit Advisory Committee. June 22, 2018

I-35W Solutions Alliance Project Update July 13, 2017

Appendix A-1: Purpose and Need Statement

92% COMMUTING IN THE METRO. Congested Roadways Mode Share. Roadway Congestion & Mode Share

Westside Transportation Access Needs Assessment - Short and Long Term Improvements

Improving Mobility Without Building More Lanes

WELCOME. City of Greater Sudbury. Transportation Demand Management Plan

2. Context. Existing framework. The context. The challenge. Transport Strategy

North Coast Corridor:

Broward Boulevard Gateway Implementation Project, Downtown Walkability Analysis, & Joint Development Initiative (JDI)

Planning Regionally With Transit

Tulsa Metropolitan Area LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN

Moving Cambridge. City of Cambridge Transportation Master Plan Public Consultation Centre. March 7, :00 8:00 PM.

Cherry Creek Transportation and Land Use Forum September 25, 2013 Meeting Summary

Providence Downtown Transit Connector STAKEHOLDER MEETING #2. Stakeholder Meeting #1 October 24, 2016

Transportation Master Plan Advisory Task Force

Appendix 1 Transit Network Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Community Transit Solutions for the Suburbs APTA Annual Meeting Steve Fittante, New Jersey Transit Corporation September 30, 2013

From Disarray to Complete Street:

Integrating Community Development and Transportation Strategies. November 13, 2014

Transit Planning at 3 Scales: the Network, Corridor, and Station Levels

Transcription:

What is MCTS NEXT? FASTER SERVICE MORE CONNECTIONS INCREASED ACCESSIBILITY Redesigning routes for the future of transit in Milwaukee County. MCTS NEXT is a new way of looking at transit. We re examining how we can provide faster service with more connections and increased accessibility. We re also looking at making transit easier to use. At its core, MCTS NEXT is about creating more high frequency bus routes. By increasing transit service in busy corridors, we can help more people get to work, school and everywhere they are going faster and easier.

Benefits of Redesigning Routes Current Riders Frequency: Buses come more often Transfers: Less waiting when transferring between routes Speed: Shorter overall travel times for many trips Milwaukee Community Access: More residents will have access to a bus route that arrives every 15 minutes (or better) Simplicity: An expanded network of frequent bus routes will be easier for riders to understand Efficiency: Frequent routes cost MCTS significantly less to operate per passenger, ensuring taxpayer money is spent wisely

Why MCTS NEXT? Opportunities: A comprehensive network analysis will ensure MCTS service is efficient, sustainable, and integrates with BRT, Bublr Bikes and the new streetcar Riders: Adjust network to better serve riders by meeting modern day travel needs Money: MCTS NEXT strives to deliver quality service in the most costeffective way despite scarce financial resources Sustainability: A network more focused on high ridership corridors will increase revenue and ensure MCTS future success

Support for MCTS NEXT 89% of current MCTS riders are willing to transfer to reduce overall travel time* Part of a larger vision The region s transportation plan, called Vision 2050, recommends significant improvement to and expansion of the public transit system to provide enhanced service that is time-competitive with a car. The regional plan focuses on high travel demand corridors 56% of current MCTS riders are willing to walk to reduce wait time at a stop* SEWRPC's VISION 2050 * SOURCE: MCTS Customer Satisfaction Survey 2017

What is High Frequency? High frequency buses arrive every 15 minutes (or better) Current Network Wide Coverage, Low Frequency Only 40% of MCTS service is high frequency Wider coverage but buses come less frequently Limited weekend service Routes and connections can be confusing MCTS NEXT More Frequent, Fast and Easy to Use Invest in high frequency service by shifting service away from low frequency or under-performing routes Increase speed of service by removing lightly-used bus stops that are too closely spaced Simplify confusing routes Concentrate service in areas that have a mix of residential, commercial and entertainment uses with good pedestrian facilities

How Does it Work? This is Jane, a teacher at Marquette University High School. She takes a trip from the school to her house at 82nd & Becher. Here's how Jane would make the trip with our Current System: Marquette University High School Here's how Jane would make the same trip with MCTS Next: Walk for 2 mins to 35th & Wisconsin Walk for 2 mins to 35th & Wisconsin Get on the GoldLine at 35th & Wisconsin Get on the GoldLine at 35th & Wisconsin Ride for 12 mins to Glenview Ave Ride for 10 mins to 76th Street Wait for 20 minutes at Wisconsin & Glenview Ave for Route 67 Get on the Route 67 at Wisconsin & Glenview. Wait for 8 minutes at Wisconsin & 76th Street for new High Frequency Route Get on the new High Frequency Route at Wisconsin & 76th Street Ride for 10 mins Ride for 10 mins Walk for 3 mins to 82nd & Becher Walk for 9 mins to 82nd & Becher Total Trip: 47 minutes Total Trip: 39 minutes Jane's Home

Redesigns in Other Cities Columbus, OH (COTA) Transit Center, July 13, 2017 With the redesign, COTA says 100,000 additional Columbus residents are within a five minute walk of transit that comes every 15 minutes or better, and 110,000 more jobs are within a five-minute walk of transit. Saturday service increased by 50% and Sunday service increased by 120%. Jacksonville, FL (JTA) Jacksonville Daily Record, April 24, 2015 Based on data collected by the authority between Dec. 1, the day the new route system went into effect, and March 31, ridership is up 6 percent overall. That s about 200,000 more riders, compared to usage before the new system was implemented. It was the most comprehensive redesign of mass transit in Jacksonville in more than 30 years. Houston, TX Medium, April 18, 2017 (Houston Metro) In less than a year, ridership shot up by 2.3%, which sounds modest until you consider that almost every major city in America saw a decrease in ridership in the same 2015 2016 time period (for many reasons). Moreover, Houston was undergoing a small recession at the time. Fewer jobs, fewer commutes. Orange County (OCTA) Streetsblog Cal, November 20, 2017 OCTA launched a multileveled overhaul of its bus system OC Bus 360 last year, and the results are showing positive signs. While bus ridership declined by three percent countywide, bus ridership on routes in core areas of the county where service was improved was up 19.6 percent as of September 2017.

High Frequency vs. Low Frequency Current System High frequency service: 40% of buses - 10 of 31 routes Low frequency service: 60% of buses - 21 of 31 routes 60% - 40% High frequency service: 60% of buses Low frequency service: 40% of buses 80% - 20% High frequency service: 80% of buses Low frequency service: 20% of buses

What Will MCTS NEXT Deliver for Milwaukee? Improving MCTS benefits everyone.

FAQs What are the goals of MCTS NEXT? By comprehensively reviewing the network, MCTS will understand how to better serve our existing and potential riders. The program will provide more frequent service on busy corridors, more connections overall and better accessibility for more riders than we do today. More high frequency bus routes reduce travel times for current riders and attract new riders. How much does it cost? MCTS NEXT is a reimagining of the MCTS route network using current budget constraints. We do not anticipate any additional funding but do assume future budgets will allow us to continue to offer the same amount of service we do today. Will MCTS NEXT make my trip shorter? The goal of MCTS NEXT is to speed up travel times on the vast majority of trips taken. Does MCTS NEXT impact weekend service? Under the MCTS NEXT plan, weekend service would dramatically improve. People travel seven days a week, and currently our service does not match the demand. Some routes will see increased frequency to better represent the demand. More frequent weekend service will provide riders with better service to get to their destinations seven days a week. How does the plan address Summerfest & other Special Service? The focus on MCTS NEXT is the seven day a week fixed route service that comprises 90% of MCTS service. Freeway Flyers, UBUSes, and Summerfest and State Fair service are not part of the analysis. How does the plan address ParaTransit services? MCTS ParaTransit services will remain unchanged as a result of the MCTS NEXT plan.