The effect of back spin on a table tennis ball moving in a viscous fluid.

Similar documents
AE Dept., KFUPM. Dr. Abdullah M. Al-Garni. Fuel Economy. Emissions Maximum Speed Acceleration Directional Stability Stability.

Basic Fluid Mechanics

ROAD MAP... D-1: Aerodynamics of 3-D Wings D-2: Boundary Layer and Viscous Effects D-3: XFLR (Aerodynamics Analysis Tool)

Incompressible Flow over Airfoils

Welcome to Aerospace Engineering

AERODYNAMIC CHARACTERISTICS OF NACA 0012 AIRFOIL SECTION AT DIFFERENT ANGLES OF ATTACK

Jet Propulsion. Lecture-17. Ujjwal K Saha, Ph. D. Department of Mechanical Engineering Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati

Flow Over Bodies: Drag and Lift

PRE-TEST Module 2 The Principles of Flight Units /60 points

Aerodynamic Analysis of a Symmetric Aerofoil

J. Szantyr Lecture No. 21 Aerodynamics of the lifting foils Lifting foils are important parts of many products of contemporary technology.

Lift for a Finite Wing. all real wings are finite in span (airfoils are considered as infinite in the span)

A COMPUTATIONAL STUDY ON THE DESIGN OF AIRFOILS FOR A FIXED WING MAV AND THE AERODYNAMIC CHARACTERISTIC OF THE VEHICLE

AF101 to AF109. Subsonic Wind Tunnel Models AERODYNAMICS. A selection of optional models for use with TecQuipment s Subsonic Wind Tunnel (AF100)

Aero Club. Introduction to Flight

CHAPTER-1 INTRODUCTION

The subsonic compressibility effect is added by replacing. with

AERODYNAMICS I LECTURE 7 SELECTED TOPICS IN THE LOW-SPEED AERODYNAMICS

ANALYSIS OF AERODYNAMIC CHARACTERISTICS OF A SUPERCRITICAL AIRFOIL FOR LOW SPEED AIRCRAFT

CFD ANALYSIS OF FLOW AROUND AEROFOIL FOR DIFFERENT ANGLE OF ATTACKS

THEORY OF WINGS AND WIND TUNNEL TESTING OF A NACA 2415 AIRFOIL. By Mehrdad Ghods

Detailed study 3.4 Topic Test Investigations: Flight

Low Speed Wind Tunnel Wing Performance

Uncontrolled copy not subject to amendment. Principles of Flight

Applications of Bernoulli s principle. Principle states that areas with faster moving fluids will experience less pressure

It should be noted that the symmetrical airfoil at zero lift has no pitching moment about the aerodynamic center because the upper and

Subsonic wind tunnel models

8d. Aquatic & Aerial Locomotion. Zoology 430: Animal Physiology

Investigation on 3-D Wing of commercial Aeroplane with Aerofoil NACA 2415 Using CFD Fluent

No Description Direction Source 1. Thrust

C-1: Aerodynamics of Airfoils 1 C-2: Aerodynamics of Airfoils 2 C-3: Panel Methods C-4: Thin Airfoil Theory

Aerodynamic Analysis of Blended Winglet for Low Speed Aircraft

Lift generation: Some misconceptions and truths about Lift

ROTORS for WIND POWER

CASE STUDY FOR USE WITH SECTION B

Reduction of Skin Friction Drag in Wings by Employing Riblets

EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF FLOW OVER SYMMETRICAL AEROFOIL Mayank Pawar 1, Zankhan Sonara 2 1,2

OUTLINE FOR Chapter 4

Incompressible Flow over Airfoils

Principles of glider flight

Aerodynamics Principles

ME 239: Rocket Propulsion. Forces Acting on a Vehicle in an Atmosphere (Follows Section 4.2) J. M. Meyers, PhD

Anna University Regional office Tirunelveli

Induced Drag Reduction for Modern Aircraft without Increasing the Span of the Wing by Using Winglet

Chapter 11 EXTERNAL FLOW: DRAG AND LIFT

Exploration Series. AIRPLANE Interactive Physics Simulation Page 01

High Swept-back Delta Wing Flow

CFD Analysis ofwind Turbine Airfoil at Various Angles of Attack

Science of Flight. Introduction to Aerodynamics for the Science Student By Pat Morgan

Numerical Investigation of Multi Airfoil Effect on Performance Increase of Wind Turbine

Incompressible Potential Flow. Panel Methods (3)

Parasite Drag. by David F. Rogers Copyright c 2005 David F. Rogers. All rights reserved.

EFFECT OF GURNEY FLAPS AND WINGLETS ON THE PERFORMANCE OF THE HAWT

THE CURVE OF THE CRICKET BALL SWING AND REVERSE SWING

Wing-Body Combinations

AERODYNAMIC CHARACTERISTICS OF SPIN PHENOMENON FOR DELTA WING

Computational Analysis of the S Airfoil Aerodynamic Performance

BUILD AND TEST A WIND TUNNEL

Experimental and Theoretical Investigation for the Improvement of the Aerodynamic Characteristic of NACA 0012 airfoil

Avai 193 Fall 2016 Laboratory Greensheet

Aerodynamic Terms. Angle of attack is the angle between the relative wind and the wing chord line. [Figure 2-2] Leading edge. Upper camber.

THE BRIDGE COLLAPSED IN NOVEMBER 1940 AFTER 4 MONTHS OF ITS OPENING TO TRAFFIC!

WHAT IS GLIDER? A light engineless aircraft designed to glide after being towed aloft or launched from a catapult.

CFD Analysis of Effect of Variation in Angle of Attack over NACA 2412 Airfoil through the Shear Stress Transport Turbulence Model

Reynolds Number Effects on Leading Edge Vortices

Aircraft Design: A Systems Engineering Approach, M. Sadraey, Wiley, Figures

Flight Corridor. The speed-altitude band where flight sustained by aerodynamic forces is technically possible is called the flight corridor.

UNCORRECTED PAGE PROOFS

INTERFERENCE EFFECT AND FLOW PATTERN OF FOUR BIPLANE CONFIGURATIONS USING NACA 0024 PROFILE

A103 AERODYNAMIC PRINCIPLES

Kinematics of Vorticity

DEFINITIONS. Aerofoil

Aerodynamic Basics Larry Bogan - Jan 2002 version MECHANICS

Winnipeg Headingley Aero Modellers. Things About Airplanes.

Preliminary Analysis of Drag Reduction for The Boeing

Preliminary design of a high-altitude kite. A flexible membrane kite section at various wind speeds

Aerodynamic Analyses of Horizontal Axis Wind Turbine By Different Blade Airfoil Using Computer Program

INVESTIGATION OF PRESSURE CONTOURS AND VELOCITY VECTORS OF NACA 0015IN COMPARISON WITH OPTIMIZED NACA 0015 USING GURNEY FLAP

SEMI-SPAN TESTING IN WIND TUNNELS

Principles of Flight. Chapter 4. From the Library at Introduction. Structure of the Atmosphere

Experimental Investigation Of Flow Past A Rough Surfaced Cylinder

CFD ANALYSIS OF EFFECT OF FLOW OVER NACA 2412 AIRFOIL THROUGH THE SHEAR STRESS TRANSPORT TURBULENCE MODEL

Figure 1. Curtis 1911 model D type IV pusher

AE2610 Introduction to Experimental Methods in Aerospace AERODYNAMIC FORCES ON A WING IN A SUBSONIC WIND TUNNEL

Keywords: dynamic stall, free stream turbulence, pitching airfoil

PRESSURE DISTRIBUTION OF SMALL WIND TURBINE BLADE WITH WINGLETS ON ROTATING CONDITION USING WIND TUNNEL

STUDY OF VARIOUS NACA SERIES AEROFOIL SECTIONS AND WING CONTOUR GENERATION USING CATIA V5

Drag Divergence and Wave Shock. A Path to Supersonic Flight Barriers

AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF THE EFFECTS OF SWEPT ANGLE ON THE BOUNDARY LAYER OF THE 2D WING

External Tank- Drag Reduction Methods and Flow Analysis

THE COLLEGE OF AERONAUTICS CRANFIELD

Lecture # 08: Boundary Layer Flows and Drag

Aerofoil Design for Man Powered Aircraft

Aerodynamics of Winglet: A Computational Fluid Dynamics Study Using Fluent

PRINCIPLES OF FLIGHT

ScienceDirect. Investigation of the aerodynamic characteristics of an aerofoil shaped fuselage UAV model

Numerical Simulation And Aerodynamic Performance Comparison Between Seagull Aerofoil and NACA 4412 Aerofoil under Low-Reynolds 1

Aerodynamic Performance Optimization Of Wind Turbine Blade By Using High Lifting Device

Dillon Thorse Flow Visualization MCEN 4047 Team Poject 1 March 14th, 2013

NUMERICAL INVESTIGATION OF AERODYNAMIC CHARACTERISTICS OF NACA AIRFOIL WITH A GURNEY FLAP

Transcription:

How can planes fly? The phenomenon of lift can be produced in an ideal (non-viscous) fluid by the addition of a free vortex (circulation) around a cylinder in a rectilinear flow stream. This is known as the Magnus effect. It was mentioned by Newton in 1672 and was investigated experimentally by Magnus in 1853. In a real (viscous) fluid, this effect may be produced by a tennis ball, for example, by making it spin as it travels through the air. Because the relative velocity between the air and the ball is zero at the surface of the ball, the spin of the ball produces a circulation approximating a free vortex outside the boundary layer. A top spin produces a downward force, and a back spin upward force. Spin about a vertical axis produces a sideward force, known as a "hook" or "slice" in golf. In the case of both the ideal fluid and the real fluid, a circulation is necessary for the production of a lift force. Fig. 1 The effect of back spin on a table tennis ball moving in a viscous fluid. Lift is expressed as the product of a lift coefficient, the dynamic pressure of the free stream, and the chord area of the lifting vane. The lift coefficient depends on a number of parameters, including the shape and angle of attack of the vane, Reynolds number, Mach number, aspect ratio, etc. The lift force is generally defined by the equation F Lift = C L ½ ρ v s 2 A where C L is the lift coefficient; (ρ v s 2 /2) is the dynamic pressure of the free stream; and A is the chord area of the lifting vane. Fig. 2 shows the flow lines past an airfoil at a given angle of attack α, with and without circulation. The circulation required to swing the trailing stagnation streamline A tangent to the trailing edge of the airfoil is the desired quantity. The addition of circulation results in a higher velocity and lower pressure over the upper surface and a lower velocity and higher pressure over the lower surface airfoil. a03/p1/fluids/flight.doc 1

A simple model relates the lift coefficient to the angle of attack for an airfoil in an ideal fluid when the airfoil thickness and camber approach zero (flat plate) C L = 2 π sinα o for small angles of attack. The angle α o is the difference between the actual angle of attack and the angle of attack for which the lift is zero. For a flat plate and symmetrical airfoils without 'camber (curvature), α o is the same as α, since lift is zero for zero angle of attack. F lift A a b Fig. 2 Ideal fluid passing an airfoil. (a) Without circulation. No lift or drag. (b) With circulation lift but no drag. Circulation added to flow pattern in (a) to produce flow pattern in (b). Thus, ideal flow theory predicts actual lift performance amazingly well but gives zero drag in an infinite fluid for steady flow. An airfoil in a real fluid must create its own circulation, or vortex field, just as the spinning table tennis ball, in order to experience lift. The starting vortex is indicated in Fig. 3. As the motion begins, it is very slow and approaches that of irrotational flow in an ideal fluid. The fluid particles passing around the trailing edge must move very rapidly and must approach a stagnation condition at A. But because of the viscosity of the fluid, they have less velocity than if the fluid were ideal, and the fluid separates from the trailing edge of the airfoil in the form of a vortex Fig. 3b. As this vortex passes from the airfoil, an opposing reaction starts a counter circulation opposite in direction to that of the trailing vortex. It is this induced counter circulation that produces lift. Starting vortex (a) counter circulation (b) Fig. 3 Starting vortex (a) at the beginning of motion and (b) after vortex created. a03/p1/fluids/flight.doc 2

For a finite lifting vane (the preceding discussion applies vane of infinite span), additional explanations are necessary, since a vortex cannot terminate within the fluid. The lift of a finite wing is zero at its tips, and thus the circulation would appear to be there also, so that the vortex system cannot extend out to infinity. A closed vortex loop is necessary, and this loop consists of tip vortices that trail behind the airfoil back to the starting vortex (Fig. 4). The starting vortex degenerates to zero with time because of viscous dissipation, and the vortex pattern is thus more horseshoe shaped than rectangular or toroidal. The tip vortices have low-pressure cores, and for ship propellers they are seen as threadlike cavities in the shape of helixes peeling off the blade tips. Under certain conditions they may be observed as vapour trails behind aircraft flying at high altitudes. Air within the vortex core expands and cools, and vapours condense to become visible. For an airfoil of finite span, the tip vortices produce a downward wash. Circulation around an airfoil Trailing tip vortices Starting vortices Trailing tip vortices Fig. 4 Closed loop vortex pattern for a finite wing. Lift (C L ) and drag (C D ) data can be plotted against the angle of attack α (Fig. 5). A desirable characteristic of an airfoil is a high lift to drag ratio. In Fig. 5b, the maximum value of this ratio is found by finding the tangent to the curve through the origin that has the largest slope. This is the point A in Fig. 5b. Fig. 5 shows that the attack angle can t be to large, otherwise a stall condition is reached and lift is no longer provided by the circulation around the airfoil. a03/p1/fluids/flight.doc 3

(a) (b) stall C L Decreasing Reynolds number C L Aspect ratio: span / chord Angle of attack α C D (c) (d) Fig. 5 Airfoil characteristics. (a) and (b)typical lift and drag coefficients. (c) Effect of Reynolds number on lift coefficient and stall angle. (d) Effect of airfoil aspect ratio. a03/p1/fluids/flight.doc 4

Lift of airfoils may be calculated or they may be measured directly in a wind tunnel by the integration of the pressures over the airfoil section. The algebraic difference between the predominantly negative pressure on the top surface of the foil and the predominantly positive pressure on the bottom surface will result in a net force normal to the chord of the airfoil. As a first approximation, the component of this force normal to the approaching free stream is the net lift on the airfoil. If p x is the surface pressure at a distance x from the leading edge of an airfoil of chord length C, p S is the free stream pressure, and is the free stream velocity of approach, then the surface pressures may be expressed as a dimensionless pressure coefficient C p = (p x p S ) / (1/2 ρ 2 ) The variation of C p over an airfoil (NACA 0015: symmetrical foil with maximum thickness 15% of chord length) in a small wind tunnel is shown in Fig. 6. The average height between the two curves in Fig. 6 is called the normal force coefficient C N and is related to the angle of attack by C L ~ C N cosα For the data in given in Fig. 6, C L = 0.85 and from the equation C L = 2π sinα = 0.87. Thus, calculations from an ideal fluid theory agree well with measured values of lift. According to the Bernoulli equation, the maximum pressure from the free stream value p s is the dynamics pressure. Thus, at a stagnation point on an airfoil, the max value of p x p S = ½ 2 and the maximum pressure coefficient is C p = 1. C p -3-2 -1 0 +1 Most of the lift is generated by the drop in pressure Over the upper front surface of the airfoil Pressure on upper surface Pressure on lower surface x / C 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 Fig. 6 Dimensionless plot of measured pressure coefficient over an NACA 0015 airfoil at an attack angle of 8 with Reynolds number ~ 6 10 4. a03/p1/fluids/flight.doc 5

The low pressures indicated in Fig. 6 for the front upper surface provide most of the lift for this airfoil. Associated with these low pressures are high velocities, so that at high subsonic free stream velocities, local velocities along the foil surface may become supersonic and shocks may affect the flow. DRAG The total drag on an aircraft is due to pressure differences and viscous shear and the drag force acts in a direction parallel and opposite to the direction of motion of the aircraft. Viscous shear forces may play an important role in the development of the boundary layer and influencing the point of separation of the boundary layer from the surface of the body. This affects the size of the pressure differences and pressure drag. This skin friction is the force that the air exerts on a surface in the direction of flow and is a direct consequence of momentum transfer through the boundary layer. The pressure differences around the aircraft, arise from a force known as the form drag and is a consequence of the acceleration of the fluid through which the aircraft is moving. It is very depend upon the shape and orientation of an object. F drag = C ½ ρ 2 A C is the drag coefficient (for skin friction or other forms), ½ ρ 2 is the dynamic pressure of the free stream and A is the projected frontal area, or area being sheared for pure skin friction, or the chord area for lifting vanes. Reference: Essentials of Engineering Fluid Mechanics (3 rd Ed) Reuben M. Olson a03/p1/fluids/flight.doc 6