Gas-liquid flow optimization with a Bubble Breaker device

Similar documents
32 nd Gas-Lift Workshop. Optimizing Subsea Well Kick-off Operations Case Study Using FlowLift2

Don-Nan Pump & Supply. Don-Nan Pump & Supply 1

Intermittent Gas Lift Utilizing a Pilot Valve

Considerations for Qualifying Elastomers Used in Artificial Lift Equipment

Anomaly Marker Method for Gas-Lift Wells

FLOWING GRADIENTS IN LIQUID LOADED GAS WELLS

Honeywell s On-line Gas Lift Optimization Solution

Using Valve Performance in Gas Lift Design Software

Acoustic Techniques to Monitor and Troubleshoot Gas-lift Wells

Advanced Intermittent Gas Lift Utilizing a Pilot Valve

Optimizing Chemical Injection

Intermittent Gas Lift and Gas Assist Plunger Lift

How does an unstable GLV affect the producing zones?

Gas Well Deliquification Workshop Sheraton Hotel, Denver, Colorado February 20 22, 2017

Troubleshooting Gas-lift Wells Using Dual Shot Acoustic Technique

37 th Gas-Lift Workshop Houston, Texas, USA February 3 7, Alan Brodie, PTC

Bellows Cycle Life & How Manufacturing Processes Can Impact it

Weatherford Inverse Gas Lift System (IGLS)

Downhole Gas Separator Selection

Gas-Well De-Watering Method Field Study

Setting Plunger Fall Velocity Using Venturi Plungers

Two Short Topics 1) Using Compressors More Effectively 2) Improving Upon Poor-Boy Gas-Lift

Global Gas Lift Optimization Using WellTracer Surveys

Using Gas Lift to Unload Horizontal Gas Wells

Correlating Laboratory Approaches to Foamer Product Selectione

Plunger Fall Velocity Model

Plunger Fall Velocity Model

Troubleshooting Unloading Gas Lift Design using DynaLift TM

Downhole Gas Separation Performance

36 th Gas-Lift Workshop. Reverse Flow Check Valve Reliability and Performance Testing of Gas Lift Barrier Check Valves

Dan Casey Pro-Seal Lift Systems, Inc.

Pressure Test Tubing for Leak

Downhole Diverter Gas Separator

31 st Gas-Lift Workshop

Downhole Gas Separator Selection

Carbon Fiber Sucker Rods versus Steel and Fiberglass

Acoustic Troubleshooting of Coal Bed Methane Wells

Down-Hole Gas Separator Performance Simulation

A Longer Lasting Flowing Gas Well

Downhole Pressure Boosting: A production enhancement tool for both dry and liquid loaded Gas wells

Weatherford Inverse Gas Lift System (IGLS)

Gas-Lift Test Facility for High- Pressure and High-Temperature Gas Flow Testing

Presented By Dr. Youness El Fadili. February 21 th 2017

Gas Lift Valve Testing

Sucker Rod Lift Downhole Gas Separators Proposed Industry Testing

2010 Sucker Rod Pumping Workshop Optimizing Production and Reducing Costs by Solving Rod Pumping Problems With The Beam Gas Compressor

Plunger Lift Algorithms A Review

Continuous Injection of Hydrate Inhibitor in Gas Lift Gas to Mitigate Downtime Due to Downhole Annular Plugging

Packer-Type Gas Separator with Seating Nipple

Pacemaker Plunger Operations in Greater Natural Buttes

Appalachian Basin Gas Well. Marietta College, Marietta, Ohio June 7-8, Development. Robert McKee, P.E. Design Engineer Multi Products Company

Beam Pumping to Dewater Horizontal Gas Wells

Modelling Gas Well Liquid (Un)Loading

Pump Fillage Problem Overview. Jim McCoy. 9 th Annual Sucker Rod Pumping Workshop. Renaissance Hotel Oklahoma City, Oklahoma September 17-20, 2013

Gas Locked Pumps are NOT Gas Locked!

Improving Performance of Gas Lift Compressors in Liquids-Rich Gas Service

Plunger Lift: SCSSSV Applications

High Pressure Continuous Gas Circulation: A solution for the

Ball and Sleeve Plunger System Automation Algorithm Utilizing Ball Fall Rates

Is The Selection Of Artificial Lift

Pressure Activated Chamber Technology (PACT)

A Combined Experimental & Numerical Research Program to Develop a Computer Simulator for Intermittent Gas-lift

TROUBLESHOOT ROD PUMPED WELLS USING TUBING FLUID LEVEL SHOTS

Dynamic IPR and Gas Flow Rate Determined for Conventional Plunger Lift Well

Intrinsically Safe Acoustic Instrument Used in Troubleshooting Gas Lift Wells

Selection, optimization and safe operation of bypass plungers

Wireless I/O, Connecting Remote Sensors in a Wide Range of Environments

New Single Well Gas Lift Process Facilitates Fracture Treatment Flowback

Gas Well Deliquification Workshop. Gas Assisted Rod Pump

Hydraulic Piston Pump Field Trial

Barrier Philosophy for Wells on Gas lift and Ways of Reducing HSE Risks. Alan Brodie Feb 2011 For more info visit

De-Liquification and Revival of Oil & Gas Wells using Surface Jet Pump (SJP) Technology

Dual Gas Lift Well Analysis Using WellTracer

Jim McCoy. Tubing Anchor Effect on Pump Fillage. Lynn Rowlan Tony Podio Ken Skinner. Gas Well Deliquification Workshop.

Gas Well Deliquification Workshop. Sheraton Hotel, Denver, Colorado February 29 March 2, 2016

Horizontal Well Artificial Lift Simulation: Unconventional Oil & Gas Well Case Histories

Plunger Lift Optimize and Troubleshoot

Experimental study on the gas tightness of a mined cavern with groundwater

Numerical simulation of an intermediate sized bubble rising in a vertical pipe

Computer Simulation Helps Improve Vertical Column Induced Gas Flotation (IGF) System

ON THE EFFECT OF LIFT FORCES IN BUBBLE PLUMES

Measurement of Bubble Velocity using Spatial Filter Velocimetry

Numerical Analysis of Two Phase Flow Patterns in Vertical and Horizontal Pipes

bakerhughes.com CENesis PHASE multiphase encapsulated production solution Keep gas out. Keep production flowing.

ACCURACY AND FEASIBILITY OF BUBBLE DYNAMIC MEASUREMENTS WITH FOUR-POINT OPTICAL FIBER PROBES

THE EFFECTS OF INLET FLOW CONDITIONS ON GAS-LIQUID TWO-PHASE FLOW IN A MICRO TUBE. Yuji Suzuki Dept. of Mech. Eng., The univ.

Experimental Study of an Air Lift Pump

Application of CFD for Improved Vertical Column Induced Gas Flotation (IGF) System Development

Numerical Simulations of a Train of Air Bubbles Rising Through Stagnant Water

Pigging as a Flow Assurance Solution Avoiding Slug Catcher Overflow

Application of Simulation Technology to Mitsubishi Air Lubrication System

Energy and mass transfer in gas-liquid reactors.

Section 2 Multiphase Flow, Flowing Well Performance

Sheet Metal Design Guidelines

Experimental Study of Flow around a Circular Cylinder inside a Bubble Plume

10 Steps to Optimized Production

Air Bubble Departure on a Superhydrophobic Surface

REVIEW STUDY ON AIRLIFT PUMPING SYSTEMS

Retrofit Gaslift System for TLP wells

Restriction Orifice. Single or Multi Stage Orifice to. Reduce Pressure or. Limit the Flow Rate

Transcription:

35 th Gas-Lift Workshop Houston, Texas, USA February 6 10, 2012 Gas-liquid flow optimization with a Bubble Breaker device Hendy T. Rodrigues, Petr. Eng. Petrobras Research Center Feb. 6-10, 2012 2012 Gas-Lift Workshop 1

Petrobras R&D Center, Rio de Janeiro Feb. 6-10, 2012 2012 Gas-Lift Workshop 2

Introduction Bubble breaker was first presented by Shell engineers (Schrama and Fernandes, 2005): Experimental and field tests Objective is to break the bubbles into smaller diameters, or change the flow pattern

Motivation Smaller bubbles reduce hidrostatic pressure drop and delay the transition to slug flow (Guet et. al., 2003)

Motivation Lower rise velocity Greater void fraction lower hidrostatic pressure gradient. ρ = ρ α + ρ 1 G L ( α ) α = Q G A V G

Motivation Bubble rise velocity increases with bubble diamenter. D~1,5mm D~17mm (Celata et. al., 2007) (Parkinson et. al., 2008) (Tomiyama et. al., 2002) (Nguyen et. al., 1998)

Experiments This work presents experimental results to evaluate the device: Pressure measurements: At four locations along the pipe. Ratio of Pressure Gradients before and after the bubble breaker. R=(Press. Grad. After)/(Press. Grad. Before) Detailed videos: high-speed camera.

Experimental facilities

Bubble breaker 3 different geometries: 1 plate with orifices and 2 Venturi

Test conditions Test conditions: 1000 Q L = 6 21 L/min Q G = 9 90 L/min Air and water QL (L/min) 100 Disperse bubbles 10 Slug 1 1 10 100 1000 QG (L/min)

Videos Dispersed bubbles One elongated bubble Slug flow

Pressure loss results 1.0 0.8 QL=6 L/min Orifícios 8x3mm Venturi 8,5mm Venturi 6mm 1.0 0.8 QL=12 L/min Orifícios 8x3mm Venturi 8,5mm Venturi 6mm P (kgf/cm2) 0.6 0.4 P (kgf/cm2) 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.0 0 20 40 60 80 0.0 0 20 40 60 80 QG local (l/min) QG local (l/min) 1.0 0.8 QL=16,8 L/min Orifícios 8x3mm Venturi 8,5mm Venturi 6mm 1.0 0.8 QL=21 L/min Orifícios 8x3mm Venturi 8,5mm Venturi 6mm P (kgf/cm2) 0.6 0.4 P (kgf/cm2) 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.0 0 20 40 60 80 QG local (l/min) 0.0 0 20 40 60 80 QG local (l/min)

Pressure gradients ratio 1.6 1.6 QL=6 L/min QL=12 L/min 1.4 1.4 1.2 1.2 1.0 0.8 Orifícios 8x3mm Venturi 8,5mm Venturi 6mm 0.6 0 20 40 60 80 QG local (l/min) 1.6 1.4 QL=21 L/min Orifícios 8x3mm Venturi 8,5mm Venturi 6mm 1.2 R R R 1.0 0.8 Orifícios 8x3mm Venturi 8,5mm Venturi 6mm 0.6 0 20 40 60 80 QG local (l/min) 1.6 1.4 QL=16,8 L/min Orifícios 8x3mm Venturi 8,5mm Venturi 6mm 1.2 R 1.0 1.0 0.8 0.8 0.6 0.6 0 20 40 60 80 0 20 40 60 80 QG local (l/min) QG local (l/min) Values of R lower than 1 indicates that the Bubble Breaker is effective!

Results Bubble breaker is more effective at the Disperse Bubbles flow pattern (higher liquid flow rates). Geometry should be studied for each application. Reduction in the Pressure Gradients must be compared to local pressure drop. Next works: Different geometries to enhance bubble breaking while reducing local pressure drop.

References 1 Schrama, E. and Fernandes, R. The bubble breaker: breaking up slug flow into dispersed bubbly flow using a passive mechanical device. BHR Group 2005 Multiphase Production Technology 12 2 Guet, S., Ooms, G., Oliemans, R. V. A. and Mudde, R. F. Bubble Injector Effect on the Gaslift Efficiency AIChE Journal, Vol. 49, No. 9, 2003. 3 Celata, G. P., D Annibale, F., Di Marco, P., Memoli, G. and Tomiyama, A. Measurements of rising velocity of a small bubble in a stagnant fluid in one- and two-component systems Exp. Thermal and Fluid Sciences, Vol. 31, 2007. 4 Parkinson, L., Sedev, R., Fornasiero, D. and Ralston, J. The terminal rise velocity of 10 100 μm diameter bubbles in water Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, Vol. 322, 2008. 5 Tomiyama, A., Celata, G. P., Hosokawa, S. and Yoshida, S. Terminal velocity of single bubbles in surface tension force dominant regime Int. J. of Multiphase Flow, Vol. 28, 2002. 6 Nguyen, A. V. Prediction of Bubble Terminal Velocities in Contaminated Water AIChE Journal, Vol. 44, No. 1, 1998.

Copyright Rights to this presentation are owned by the company(ies) and/or author(s) listed on the title page. By submitting this presentation to the Gas-Lift Workshop, they grant to the Workshop, the Artificial Lift Research and Development Council (ALRDC), and the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), rights to: Display the presentation at the Workshop. Place it on the www.alrdc.com web site, with access to the site to be as directed by the Workshop Steering Committee. Place it on a CD for distribution and/or sale as directed by the Workshop Steering Committee. Other uses of this presentation are prohibited without the expressed written permission of the company(ies) and/or author(s) who own it and the Workshop Steering Committee. Feb. 6 10. 2012 2012 Gas-Lift Workshop 16

Disclaimer The following disclaimer shall be included as the last page of a Technical Presentation or Continuing Education Course. A similar disclaimer is included on the front page of the Gas-Lift Workshop Web Site. The Artificial Lift Research and Development Council and its officers and trustees, and the Gas-Lift Workshop Steering Committee members, and their supporting organizations and companies (here-inafter referred to as the Sponsoring Organizations), and the author(s) of this Technical Presentation or Continuing Education Training Course and their company(ies), provide this presentation and/or training material at the Gas-Lift Workshop "as is" without any warranty of any kind, express or implied, as to the accuracy of the information or the products or services referred to by any presenter (in so far as such warranties may be excluded under any relevant law) and these members and their companies will not be liable for unlawful actions and any losses or damage that may result from use of any presentation as a consequence of any inaccuracies in, or any omission from, the information which therein may be contained. The views, opinions, and conclusions expressed in these presentations and/or training materials are those of the author and not necessarily those of the Sponsoring Organizations. The author is solely responsible for the content of the materials. The Sponsoring Organizations cannot and do not warrant the accuracy of these documents beyond the source documents, although we do make every attempt to work from authoritative sources. The Sponsoring Organizations provide these presentations and/or training materials as a service. The Sponsoring Organizations make no representations or warranties, express or implied, with respect to the presentations and/or training materials, or any part thereof, including any warrantees of title, noninfringement of copyright or patent rights of others, merchantability, or fitness or suitability for any purpose. Feb. 6 10, 2012 2012 Gas-Lift Workshop 17