North Carolina Transportation Issues

Similar documents
Report Overview Policy versus Performance: Directions for North Carolina s Largest Transit Systems

COMPARISON OF FIXED & VARIABLE RATES (25 YEARS) CHARTERED BANK ADMINISTERED INTEREST RATES - PRIME BUSINESS*

Utility Debt Securitization Authority 2013 T/TE Billed Revenues Tracking Report

Secondary Road Program

17t h Ann u a l Re p o r t on th e ( ) POLICY STUDY

Otter Tail County 2040 Transportation Plan. Asset Management Peer Exchange

County of Orange Resources and Development Management Department Harbors, Beaches and Parks. Strategic Plan. HBP Strategic Plan Workshop 1.

Hard Shoulder Running is a valuable tool July 14, Dean H. Gustafson, PE, PTOE State Operations Engineer VDOT Operations Division

Appendix ELP El Paso, Texas 2003 Annual Report on Freeway Mobility and Reliability

91 Express Lanes Model Update 2006 State Route 91 Implementation Plan. Gerald V. Nielsten May 18, 2007

Going Green: How California is Reviving Passenger Rail. APTA/ AASHTO AASHTO 2008 State Public Transit Partnerships. August 7, 2008

MnPASS System Today and the Future

95 Express Annual Operations Report: Fiscal Year

Improving Mobility Without Building More Lanes

Transportation Day at the Capitol. Charlie Zelle Commissioner, MnDOT Feb. 16, 2017

KC Scout Kansas City s Bi-State Transportation Management Center

Nevada s Transportation Infrastructure and Future Transportation Needs

Bicycle Crashes. Number of Bike Crashes. Total Bike Crashes. are down 21% and severe bike crashes down 8% since 2013 (5 years).

JULY 2013 RIDERSHIP REPORT MTA METRO-NORTH RAILROAD EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

WIM #37 I-94, MP OTSEGO, MN APRIL 2012 MONTHLY REPORT

KC Scout Kansas City s Bi-State Transportation Management Center

United Nations Conference on Trade and Development

FINANCIAL ANALYSIS. Stoby

101 Corridor Managed Lanes

Appendix T 1: Additional Supporting Data

Managed Lanes. Steve Schilke, P.E. Major Projects Unit Head District 1. Illinois Traffic Engineering and Safety Conference October 2016

TRANSIT RIDERSHIP IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CAPITAL PROJECTS OPERATING PLANS - NEXT NETWORK TRANSIT INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

Fairfax County Transportation Funding and Roadway Service Delivery Study. Study Update Transportation Advisory Commission

What are Managed Lanes?

May 2018 FY Key Performance Report

Kentucky s Surface Transportation System

REVENUE & RIDERSHIP REPORT NOVEMBER 2017

395 Express Lanes Extension

Florida s Turnpike System Projected Debt Service Coverage Ratio ($000)*

Kevin Thorpe Financial Economist & Principal Cassidy Turley

SWISS Traffic Figures May 2004

Environment and Public Works Committee Presentation

The Changing Global Economy Impacts on Seaports and Trade Dr. Walter Kemmsies

Progress Report on the Design and Planning of an Infrastructure Improvement Project for the Sunnyside TIF District (Phase II)

WIM #36 MN 36 MP 15.0 LAKE ELMO APRIL 2014 MONTHLY REPORT

The third deficit: Illinois transportation crisis

REVENUE & RIDERSHIP REPORT SEPTEMBER 2018

2018 Annual Economic Forecast Dragas Center for Economic Analysis and Policy

Short-Term Transit Ridership and Revenue Forecasting

Are Highways Crumbling? State Performance Summaries,

September 2018 FY Key Performance Report

PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS of The Draft 2015 CLRP

MCTC 2018 RTP SCS and Madera County RIFP Multi-Modal Project Eval Criteria GV13.xlsx

Further Opening Up and Reform of China s Capital Market

Turnpike System Projected Debt Service Coverage Ratio ($000)*

Integrating CMS Into The Planning Process

Agenda. Citizen Advisory Committee. CSAH 101 (CSAH 62 to Hutchins Drive) City of Minnetonka May 29, :00 pm

Tulsa Metropolitan Area LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN

Reversible Elevated Express Lanes. A Solution for Urban Traffic Congestion

Babson Capital/UNC Charlotte Economic Forecast. May 13, 2014

RTC TRANSIT OPERATING STATISTICS RTC RIDE RTC RAPID RTC INTERCITY SIERRA SPIRIT

CONGESTED LOS ANGELES

Traffic Safety Plan Traffic Safety Plan 2015

Briefing on the State of the State. presented to the. SCAA Schuyler Center for Analysis and Advocacy

Planning and Programming Committee Meeting April 14,

Superstreets. A Tool for Safely and Efficiently Managing Congestion

January 2019 FY Key Performance Report

Northland Region road trauma for Northland Region. Road casualties Estimated social cost of crashes* Major road safety issues

nipigon.net Township of Nipigon 2018 Community Profile

Are Highways Crumbling? State and U.S. Highway Performance Trends,

Transportation Infrastructure Systems Needs and Challenges: Progress Report

GIVING GEORGIANS A CHOICE TO KEEP MOVING

2017 Nebraska Profile

WELCOME Mission-Geneva Transportation Study

Economic Overview. Melissa K. Peralta Senior Economist April 27, 2017

The Cairns Economy Recent Trends and Prospects

Attachment C: Benefit-Cost Analysis Spreadsheet

TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.

Regional Transportation Needs Within Southeastern Wisconsin

Appendix MSP Minneapolis-St. Paul, Minnesota 2003 Annual Report on Freeway Mobility and Reliability

City of Wilsonville 5 th Street to Kinsman Road Extension Project

2018 Annual Economic Forecast Dragas Center for Economic Analysis and Policy

The Herzliya Conference The Economic Dimension Prof. Rafi Melnick Provost, Interdisciplinary Center (IDC) Herzliya

Findings. TSTC went line-by-line through the STIP and categorized projects into 15 categories:

SUMMARY OF TRANSPORTATION INVESTMENTS

Transportation Planning Division

1 PEW RESEARCH CENTER

FUTURE MOBILITY IN TEXAS: The Cost of Meeting the State s Need for Safe and Efficient Mobility

ECA-ECE-ICAP Workshop on Improving Road Safety Situation in Africa: UN Road Safety Conventions and Approaches to Preventing Drink Driving

Managed Lanes: A National Perspective Managed Lane Strategies

STREET AND HIGHWAY PLAN

Appendix SEA Seattle, Washington 2003 Annual Report on Freeway Mobility and Reliability

Economics of Highway Spending and Traffic Congestion. Todd Litman Victoria Transport Policy Institute Presented Strong Towns Webinar 3 February 2016

Community & Transportation Preferences Survey

Board Strategy Day. January 25, 2018

13,351. Overall Statewide Results. How was the survey taken? Do you own or lease a personal vehicle? What is your primary means of transportation?

Tautog PID for Amendment 1. Presented to the Tautog Board August 5, 2015

Tampa Bay. Pedestrian Safety Skills

Attachment A: Columbus Area Metropolitan Transportation Plan Objectives, Performance Measures, and Targets

Old Dominion University 2017 Regional Economic Forecast. Strome College of Business

Appendix LOU Louisville, Kentucky 2003 Annual Report on Freeway Mobility and Reliability

# Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Freeway System Reconstruction Study and Preliminary Recommended Plan

A P TA J U N E TO M G E R E N D, E X E C U T I V E D I R E C TO R - O V ERVIEW KC S T R E E TC A R A U T H O R I T Y

Performance Measures Target Setting NCTCOG Public Meetings

Mobility Greater Johnson County Transportation Coalition. May 23, 2018

Transcription:

North Carolina Transportation Issues David T. Hartgen, Ph.D., P.E. Emeritus Professor of Transportation Studies UNC Charlotte Remarks at the Shaftesbury Lecture John Locke Foundation Raleigh, North Carolina February 23, 2009

Issues Status and Need Funding Expenditures Project Selection Transit and Climate Change Organizational

NC Highway Performance 2003 06 0.00 Per Mile -10.00 Disbursements -20.00 relative to US Avg -30.00-40.00-50.00 North Carolina Highway Expenditures and Performance, 2003-2006 $10.5B, 2003-2006 ($ 171,000 per mile of responsibility) -4.43 Pct RI Poor -0.22 Pct ROPA Poor -7.18 Pct UI Poor Pct -4.69 UI Congested -0.33-1.59-0.11 Pct ROPA Narrow Fatalities/ 1B VMT Pct Bridges Deficient -60.00-70.00-63.16

Highway Status Item 2006 2007 79,800 miles 2 nd 2 nd $ 3.2 B budget 8 th 8 th 58 % Capital 22 % Maintenance 16 th 16 th Status Rural Interstate Pavement 40 th 43 rd Urban Interstate Pavement 25 th 22 nd Rural Primary Pavement 39 th 29 th Urban Interstate Congestion 48 th 46 th Wow! Fatality Rate 29 th 37 th Deficient Bridges 41 st 34 th Narrow Lanes 34 th 33 rd

Congestion Trends Congestion Will DOUBLE in 25 years Charlotte 1.31 1.62 ( Chicago ) Raleigh 1.19 1.37 ( Minneapolis )

NC 25 Yr. Road Needs Condition Congestion Safety Bridges Other Total $ 10 15 B $ 10 15 B $ 3 5 B $ 15 20 B $ 10 15 B $ 48 70 B

Highway Expenditures 90-07 Disbursements ($M) 4000 3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 0 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 Capital Highway and Traffic Services Highway Law Enforcement Physical Maintenance Administration/Research Bond Interest/Refinancing

NC State Hy Revenue Sources, 2006 State Motor Fuel $ 1153 m State Vehicle $ 472 State Other $ 590 Misc $ 38 Bonds $ 0 Federal Funds $ 979 Local Govts $ 16 Total $ 3251 m

Growth is Increasing Faster than Fuel Sales

NC Highway Formulas STIP: Allocations to 7 Regions: ½ ¼ ¼ Population 1/7 th each Miles to complete Intrastate System Loop: Discretionary, based on status

Highway Projects, 1990 2003 by Cost Effectiveness 2002 Cost Effectiveness 0.000 to 0.010 0.010 to 0.020 0.020 to 0.027 0.027 to 0.040 0.040 to 0.053 0.053 to 0.080 0.080 to 0.100 0.100 to 0.150 0.150 to 0.200 0.200 to 1.290 0 40 80 120 Miles

Haywood County I 40 Newfound Rd, Exit 33 (I 2103) New Exit and approach road, 1995, 0.99 mi, $4.9 M, ADT2 500 C-E $1.23

Beaulaville, NC 24 (R 2010) Widening from 2 to 5 Lanes 5.25 miles, $9.3 M, 1994 ADT2 4100 C-E $ 0.063

Recommendations Re allocate 10 12% of weakest capital projects; Use for Maintenance. Fund Worthy Projects, not Regions Congestion Relief and Travel Time Savings Accident Reduction Operating Cost Reduction Economic Impacts Environmental Impacts

Strategy for Funding System Maintenance Capital and Maintenance Program 1990-2002 = $20.5 B Divert 50 Low CE Projects to Maintenance = $2.5B 349 Major Projects $7.3B CE 5.34 $ 2.5 B saved from 50 least CE projects 2.67 TIP + Loop Other Maintenance Program $13.5B $1.4B $5.5B

Highway Revenues and Expenditures Review Revenues Tolls Mileage Taxes Local Options/ State Infr. Bank PPP s End Diversions Fund the Best Projects Modify Highway Formula End the Loop Program

Transit Systems 10 Largest NC Systems Charlotte (20 M)..TTA( 900,000) Performance vs. Plans Recommendations Release: May 2006 Study at www.johnlocke.org

Summary Statistics for 10 Systems 250,000,000 200,000,000 150,000,000 Summary of Key Statistics (Aggregate) Historical Projected Total Operating Funds Total Capital Funds 100,000,000 50,000,000 0 Annual Vehicle Revenue Miles Annual Unlinked Trips (Total) 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

LYNX Station, Carolina Place

LYNX Cost and Ridership History LYNX Traffic And Cost Forecasts 30000 Prelim Eng 25760 Final Design Full Funding Opening Day 521.9 600 25000 462.7 500 21100 426.9 Rides/day 20000 15000 10000 5000 15500 17900 18100 14000 331.1 5535 227 370.8 385.9398.7 348.2 17650 12880 9100 18100 9090 6691 12457 14246 14807 11930 12689 16239 16140 16895 16357 16265 16470 400 15418 300 15440 13945 200 100 Cost $M Est. (2005) 2025 Rides/day Est. Opening Day Rides Actual Ridership Est. Cost $M 40.5 0 0 Jun-89 Jul-98 Nov-00 Nov-01 Nov-02 Nov-03 Nov-04 Nov-05 Apr-07 Nov-07 Dec-07 Jan-08 Feb-08 Mar-08 Apr-08 May-08 Jun-08 Jul-09 Aug-08 Sept-08 Oct-08 Nov-08 Dec-08 Jan-09

LYNX Benefits and Costs Total Cost, 20 years $ 706 m User Benefits $ 181 m Land Use Benefits $ 297 m Environ Benefits $ 3 m Total $ 481 m B/C 0.68 Local B/C 1.20

Recommendations For Transit Reassess mission, focus on mobility Hold down costs; overall funding proportional to ridership. Regional consolidation Coordinate with service agencies and schools Independent forecasts of use and costs

Recommendations cont. Limit assistance to 25% Rider participation 25 % Uniform expansion criteria Review capital expansions No state $ for new starts Limit state share of capital costs Encourage private-sector operation

Raleigh, NC Trends in CO2 25 Daily Tons, K 20 15 10 5 Traffic Growth New CAFE HY and Behavior 0 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 Year

Organization Issues Board Do We Need One? Smaller (5 7 members), Policy Oriented, Experts Approve Major Projects. No Advocacy Prohibit Political Contributions. Open Records Election? Agency Prioritize Major Projects, Select Others with Objective Data Legislature Fund Programs, not projects Modify/Drop Formula

Contact: David T. Hartgen, Ph.D. P.E. dthartge@uncc.edu david@hartgengroup.net 704 405 4278