WELL NO: BJN-8. Lower master valve

Similar documents
Practice Exam IADC WellSharp Driller and Supervisor

1. The well has been shut in on a kick and the kill operation has not started.

A case study : Underground Blowout Control at Well NHK #285

Study Guide IADC WellSharp Driller and Supervisor

DAY ONE. 2. Referring to the last question, what mud weight would be required to BALANCE normal formation pressure?

SUBSEA KILL SHEET EXERCISE No. 5

IWCF Equipment Sample Questions (Combination of Surface and Subsea Stack)

W I L D W E L L C O N T R O L CIRCULATION & WELL CONTROL

Blowout during Workover Operation A case study Narration by: Tarsem Singh & Arvind Jain, OISD

Air and Gas Drilling

ENDEAVOR ENERGY RESOURCES

Casing Design. Casing Design. By Dr. Khaled El-shreef

IWCF Equipment Sample Questions (Surface Stack)

Rig Math. Page 1.

Hydro-Mech Bridge Plug

BENEDUM (DEVONIAN, GAS) API # UPTON COUNTY, TX DRILLING PERMIT # DAILY REPORTS

WELLHEADS, FLOWLINES & GAS LIFT INJECTION SYSTEMS

VOLUMETRIC METHODS and STRIPPING OPERATIONS

August 21, Deepwater MPD / PMCD

D & V Oil Co. LP. Daily Completion Report - University CN A #6 API # /23/2016. Perfs ' ' Activity :

PHE KE30-A8 WORKOVER PROGRAM

WellCAP IADC WELL CONTROL ACCREDITATION PROGRAM

W I L D W E L L C O N T R O L AIR DRILLING

OCEAN DRILLING PROGRAM

Wellwork Chronological Regulatory Report

"Sharing To Be Better. Influx through failed cement in shoetrack during completion operations

Texas Administrative Code

BLOCK: CB-ONN-2010/8 GUJRAT-INDIA

Oil Well Potential Test, Completion or Recompletion Report, and Log

Dilution-Based Dual Gradient Well Control. Presented at the 2011 IADC Dual Gradient Workshop, 5 May 2011 by Paul Boudreau, Dual Gradient Systems LLC

Squeeze Cementing. Brett W. Williams Cementing Technical Advisor January 2016 Tulsa API Meeting

APPENDIX A1 - Drilling and completion work programme

Cased-Hole Logging Environment

Oil Well Potential Test, Completion or Recompletion Report, and Log

Deepwater Horizon Incident Internal Investigation

SPE Forum: Source Control for Wells in Shallow Water. Lars Herbst, Gulf of Mexico Regional Director

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS OIL WELL POTENTIAL TEST, COMPLETION OR RECOMPLETION REPORT, AND LOG

Innovating Gas-Lift for Life of Well Artificial Lift Solution. The Unconventional Solution!

W I L D W E L L C O N T R O L SHUT-IN PROCEDURES

Commentary on the book by Andrew Hopkins. By Graham Dalzell

2/15/06 Nora Ghobrial

Offshore Managed Pressure Drilling Experiences in Asia Pacific. SPE paper

Two Short Topics 1) Using Compressors More Effectively 2) Improving Upon Poor-Boy Gas-Lift

Worked Questions and Answers

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS OIL WELL POTENTIAL TEST, COMPLETION OR RECOMPLETION REPORT, AND LOG

W I L D W E L L C O N T R O L COMPLICATIONS

NEW PROGRAM! OIL AND GAS TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM

Petr 311 Wellbore pressures and Kick Control

Casing and Cementing Requirements

Deliquification Short Stories

WILD WELL CONTROL WARNING SIGNS OF KICKS

Pasquale Imbò e Marco Pelucchi ENI S.pA;

University 31E 4. Ward County, TX. Rig: Union Drlg Rig 229. AFE: $1,393, DHC: $761, WI: Notes: Workover:

Acid Gas Progress Report Requirements

Abandonment Program for Paramount Fort Liard F 36

Captains Meeting 2009 Introduction to Well Testing- Expro. Edwin Schoorl

WellCAP IADC WELL CONTROL ACCREDITATION PROGRAM

Wellwork Chronological Regulatory Report

Railroad Commission of Texas. Chairman Barry T. Smitherman Commissioner David Porter Commissioner Christi Craddick

WellCAP IADC WELL CONTROL ACCREDITATION PROGRAM

RULES OF THE OIL AND GAS PROGRAM DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES CHAPTER DRILLING WELLS TABLE OF CONTENTS

Elgin G4 Leak. 25 March 16 May 2012

W I L D W E L L C O N T R O L SNUBBING OPERATIONS

SUPPLEMENT Well Control for Drilling Operations Workover & Completion for Supervisors Core Curriculum and Related Learning Objectives

Elevation Resources DAILY OPERATIONS. Clean and prep location, MIRU pulling unit to mill liner top

SUPPLEMENT Well Control for Drilling Operations Workover & Completion for Drillers Core Curriculum and Related Learning Objectives

Why Do Not Disturb Is a Safety Message for Well Integrity

CHE Well Testing Package/Service:

Advanced Intermittent Gas Lift Utilizing a Pilot Valve

Drilling Morning Report

PROPOSED NEW SUB- CODE 1 RIG UP AND TEAR. Possibly Fits into Existing Code. 7/26/2018 Review PROPOSED NEW CODE EXISTING OPERATION

Downhole Gas Separator Selection

Intermittent Gas Lift Utilizing a Pilot Valve

FORGE Energy UL 21 Freedom 1 API Number:

On-Off Connector Skirt

Model A Sleeve Valve Cement Retainer

W I L D W E L L C O N T R O L PRESSURE BASICS AND CONCEPTS

Contact Information. Progressive Optimization Service. We Provide: Street Bay #2. Grande Prairie, AB T8V - 4Z2

Inflatable Packer Single & Double. Single & Double Packer Dimension. Wireline Packer. Water Testing Packer (WTP) Packer

INTERPRETATION NOTE ISSUED UNDER THE PETROLEUM DRILLING REGULATIONS (CNR 1150/96)

A Longer Lasting Flowing Gas Well

31 st Gas-Lift Workshop

Oil Well Potential Test, Completion or Recompletion Report, and Log

DB Bridge Plug. Features. Benefits. Applications

Understanding pressure and pressure

Pump Fillage Problem Overview. Jim McCoy. 9 th Annual Sucker Rod Pumping Workshop. Renaissance Hotel Oklahoma City, Oklahoma September 17-20, 2013

Gas Lift Workshop Doha Qatar 4-88 February Gas Lift Optimisation of Long Horizontal Wells. by Juan Carlos Mantecon

OPTIMUM SELECTION OF WELL CONTROL METHODS

Advanced Applications of Wireline Cased-Hole Formation Testers. Adriaan Gisolf, Vladislav Achourov, Mario Ardila, Schlumberger

Max operation pressure 6kg/cm 2. Boost pressure rate Air pressure supply 5kg/cm Hydraulic fluid expelled l/min

Downhole Gas Separator Selection

Hard or Soft Shut-in : Which is the Best Approach?

Chapter 5 Drilling and Well Testing Practices

BIMBAR INFLATABLE PACKERS AND ACCESSORIES

IPTC Introduction

Well Control Drill Guide Example Only. Drill Guide is the list of drills, questions and attributes that are in DrillPad.

International Well Control Forum. IWCF Drilling Well Control Syllabus Level 3 and 4 March 2017 Version 7.0

Kicks Controlling Techniques Efficiency in Term of Time

WellCAP IADC WELL CONTROL ACCREDITATION PROGRAM

Perforation Techniques in brown fields for Production optimization.

Transcription:

WELL NO: BGN-8.; LOC: BGH Well BGN-8 came into production on 9 th Feb. 2009. Initially the FTHP = 4000 psi, CP=2400 psi and 5 1 / 2 9 5 / 8 annulus pressure = 600 psi. The well was produced at Baghjan EPS @ of 24 KLPD. WELL NO: BJN-8 During production, leakage was noticed through the Lower Master Valve and one of the Casing Valve. It was decided to go for W/O operation to replace the leaky well head valves. Lower master valve On 15/05/09, Tbg. was punctured just above the packer at the range from 3766m- 3766.2 m with 4 holes of 0.45 dia. to establish communication from Tbg. to 5.1/2 casing. # Attempt was made to kill the well with 80 pcf Sodium formate solution using conventional method. Casing valve The well could not be killed even after pumping @ 4 times of hole volume (a total of 857 bls against 216 bls of hole volume.) following conventional method.

CMT was asked to take-over the charge of Killing operation of the well on 25 th June,09. WELL NO: BJN-8 Kill Pump Kill Manifold Choke Manifold GM(P) organized a meeting at production conference hall in the 2 nd half on 25 th June, where in well problem was discussed in detail with reference to the presentation given by Production Commissioning section. Crisis Management department assured that the well can be killed using proper equipment & well control method with 77 pcf kill fluid. Accordingly, a team was formed including executives from CMT, P(O), Drilling, Chemical department under the leadership of Sri K. Saikia, CE(D)-CMT. The team visited the well BGN-8 on 26 th June, inspected all pressure handling equipments and decided to replace the existing Choke Manifold by new Choke Manifold with remote control panel.

A new Choke Manifold with Remote Control Panel was transferred to the well after thorough check up at drilling equipment yard on 27 th June. (transferring of kill fluid from other location to the well was in progress) New Choke Manifold Operating lines and other equipments could not transferred to well on 28 th June due to Road Blockade by local people. Remote Control Panel On 29 th June, the Choke Manifold with Remote Control Panel was commissioned and tested.# All the lines, Kill Manifold, Choke Manifold etc. was tested up to 4600 psi. and the system was made ready to kill the well. 77lb/cft kill fluid was also made ready. On 30 th June, SITP=3400 psi and SICP=3400 psi Bleed off well surface gas from both Tubing and Casing. Recorded SITP=3000 psi and SICP=2800 psi 1. Reservoir Pressure = 46 kg above hydrostatic = 6136 psi 2. Pressure Exerted by hole fluid = 6136 3000 = 3136 psi 3. Equivalent Mud weight in hole at shut in condition = 36 lb/cft. 4. Required Kill Mud Weight = 77 lb/cft (considering 450 psi overbalance) Re-checked all the calculated values prior to killing the well. Pressure tested all the lines prior to killing. Made step-down kill sheet.

Brief Operational Sequence: Conducted a Tool Box meeting with all the persons present at the site. Explained safety matters during killing & Assigned duties of each & every person including security, Fire Service. Started pump at 3:15 pm and gradually increased the SPM to Kill Rate (80 SPM) keeping SICP constant. Return flow was diverted to EPS to separate gas at Test separator. Pumped Kill Mud (77 lb/cft) from Surface to Tbg. Punchered Point (3754m ) following Step- down Kill Sheet. Pump Kill Mud from Tbg. Punchered point to casing till kill mud reaches at surface maintaining Final Circulating Pressure. Diverted the return flow to well site Production tank after pumping the hole volume. At 5:45 pm checked and found both the Tbg. & Csg. Pressure Zero. Diverted the return flow to well site Mud tank after receiving 77 lb/cft fluid on return. Circulated for another ½ hr. and handed over the well for W/O operation as per plan.

Tubing and Casing pressure during well killing (in ideal condition) Pressure 3100 1400 183 183 183 Casing Pressure Tubing Pressure Strokes

Pressure Pressure behaviour during killing using conventional method 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000 11000 12000 3500 3000 TUBING 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 0 4000 Number of Strokes 3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 ANNULAS (5½ CASING) 1000 500 0

Phenomenon during killing using conventional method Applied Un-calculated imaginary Back Pressure

Pressure Pressure behaviour during killing using conventional method 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000 11000 12000 3500 3000 TUBING 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 0 4000 Number of Strokes 3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 ANNULAS (5½ CASING) 1000 500 0

Phenomenon during killing using W&W Well control method Applied Calculated & Designed Back Pressure

3100 2250 1400 650 183 1000 m 2000 m 3000 m 3754 m KM Pumping Depth 0.00 m 1000m 2000m 3000m 3754m Surface Pr. 3100 2250 1400 650 183 KM Coln. Pr. 0 1756 3512 5267 6591 OM Coln. Pr. 3036 2277 1518 759 0 Exerted Total Pr. at 3754m 6136 6283 6430 6676 6774 Formation Pr. 6136 6136 6136 6136 6136 O/balance 0 147 294 540 638

WELL NO. BGN 8 (LOC. BGH) (as on 01.06.2009) (Not to scale) D.F. Elev: 131.95m asl G.L. Elev: 122.81 m asl Dev Corr : 22.64 m GLV at 598 m Surface pressures recorded on 15.05. 2009 showed in tubing - casing annulus and casing annulus (5.1/2 X 9.5/8) as 295 Ksc & 240 Ksc respectively. Cement top behind 9.5/8 Casing :1458 m (as per CBL-VDL recorded on 12.12.2008) 9.5/8 Casing shoe at 3218.45 m SLB punctured the tubing at 3776m-3776.2m (4 shots) 2.7/8 OD EUE N-80 tubing with one GLV and hydraulic packer set at 3800 m (As per logging,tbg shoe at 3792 m) Perforations: 3873.5 3876.5 m 5.1/2 Float Collar/ Casing Shoe = 3895.06 / 3907.90 m 22 m D.C.

Step-down Kill Sheet Number of Stroke Pumping Pr. (psi) (A) Vol. (bls) Pumped Pr. Drop (psi) (B) 0 3100 0 0 200 2922 3.85 178 400 2743 7.70 357 600 2565 11.55 535 800 2387 15.40 713 1000 2209 19.25 891 1200 2030 23.10 1070 1400 1852 26.95 1248 1600 1674 30.80 1426 1800 1495 34.64 1605 2000 1317 38.50 1783 2200 1139 42.35 1961 2400 961 46.20 2139 2600 782 50.05 2318 2800 604 53.90 2496 3000 426 57.75 2674 3200 247 61.60 2853 3273 182 63.01 2918

Defective wellheads of Greater Hapjan Area Sl No Well Defects Remarks 1 Baghjan-6 Leakage observed from gate of top valve. The valve was replaced. Recently leakage observed from the gland of the side valve, while opening the S/I well. The leakage vanishes once the well starts to flow. 2 Baghjan-4 Leakage observed from the gate of the top valve while opening the S/I well. The leakage vanishes once the well starts to flow. X mass tree make: Parveen Ratings: 10000 psi, FTHP = 3400 psi X mass tree make: Parveen Ratings: 10000 psi FTHP= 3800 psi 3 Baghjan-2 Similar problem as Baghjan-4 X mass tree make: Parveen Ratings: 10000 psi FTHP= 2100 psi 4 Barekuri-6 Leakage observed from gate of top valve. The valve was replaced. 5 Baghjan-8 On 28.04.2009 leakage observed from the grease injection point of the lower master valve. It was observed that the grease injection nipple came out of its original position and a gas was sprayed from that point.. In addition to this, leakage was also observed from the top valve. 6 Makum-18 Bonnet cover of the master valve was stolen by miscreants. At present the master valve cannot be operated. X mass tree make: Parveen Ratings: 10000 psi FTHP= X mass tree make: Parveen Ratings: 10000 psi FTHP = 4000 psi, CP=2400 psi X mass tree make: Parveen Ratings: 5000 psi FTHP= 800 psi 7 Makum-29 Similar problem as Baghjan-4 and Baghjan-6 X mass tree make: Parveen Ratings: 10000 psi FTHP= 3800 psi 8 Hapjan-48 Leakage observed from the gland of the arm valve. Valve replced. X mass tree make: Parveen Ratings: 10000 psi FTHP= 3380 psi