Complete Streets and Context Classification

Similar documents
FDOT Bicycle/Pedestrian Focused Initiative & Complete Streets

FDOT Bicycle/Pedestrian Focused Initiative & Complete Streets

FDOT Complete Streets Initiative

APPENDIX A: Complete Streets Checklist DRAFT NOVEMBER 2016

Brian D. Hare, P.E. Bureau of Design PennDOT PA APA Annual Conference Investing in a Sustainable Future October 5, 2009

AMATS Complete Streets Policy

West Dimond Blvd Upgrade Jodhpur Street to Sand Lake Road

LOUISIANA COMPLETE STREETS POLICY. Ellen W. Soll, AICP Principal Soll Planning

FDOT s Bicycle & Pedestrian Focused Initiative

Contents. Champaign-Urbana Mass Transit District Stop Placement Guidelines

Linking Transportation and Health in Nashville & Middle Tennessee

Reams Road RCA Study. Board of County Commissioners Public Hearing

Exhibit 1 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM

Complete Streets Accessible Networks for an Age-Friendly World

CONTEXT SENSITIVE STREETS STANDARDS COMMITTEE

Living Streets Policy

appendix b BLOS: Bicycle Level of Service B.1 Background B.2 Bicycle Level of Service Model Winston-Salem Urban Area

Complete Streets Workshop Follow-up. April 27, 2011 Rockledge City Hall

Thank you for this opportunity to discuss with you how we can work together to make our streets more complete.

Overview. Illinois Bike Summit IDOT Complete Streets Policy Presentation. What is a Complete Street? And why build them? And why build them?

Pedestrian Safety Guide for Transit Agencies

Performance Criteria for 2035 Long Range Transportation Plan

Safety Emphasis Areas & Safety Project Development Florida Department of Transportation District Seven Tampa Bay

City of Jacksonville Mobility Fee Update

Application of a Complete Street

How Policy Drives Mode Choice in Children s Transportation to School

UPDATES, SUCCESSES, AND WHAT S AHEAD ON THE ROAD TO ZERO

Palm Beach MPO Complete Streets Policy

Chapter 5 DATA COLLECTION FOR TRANSPORTATION SAFETY STUDIES

2015 Florida Main Street Annual Conference. Complete Streets Equal Stronger Main Streets

Land Use Patterns. Traditional Modern

RESOLUTION NO ?? A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF NEPTUNE BEACH ADOPTING A COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

TOWN OF CHAPEL HILL POLICY AND PROCEDURES FOR TRAFFIC CALMING MEASURES

Creating Complete Streets to Accommodate All Users

Completing the Vision

Tulsa Metropolitan Area LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN

Proposed. City of Grand Junction Complete Streets Policy. Exhibit 10

Physical Implications of Complete Streets Policies

Complete Streets for Louisiana

CITY OF COCOA BEACH 2025 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. Section VIII Mobility Element Goals, Objectives, and Policies

Completing the Street: Denning Drive

MAKE YOUR PLACE IN CHANNELSIDE

FACTS AND FIGURES: MAKING THE CASE FOR COMPLETE STREETS IN LEE COUNTY

Malabar Road (SR 514) PD&E. Town of Malabar Briefing (July 17, 2017)

SR 693 (Pasadena Avenue) Corridor Study from Shore Drive South to 66 th Street

State Road (S.R.) 61 (U.S. 319) FPID s and

FONTAINE AVENUE STUDY Final Report

PBIC Webinar. How to Create a Bicycle Safety Action Plan: Planning for Safety [IMAGE] Oct. 2, 2014, 2 pm

Presentation to NCDOT s Complete Streets Advisory Group. June 22, 2010 Charlotte, NC

2.0 Existing Conditions

Dr. M.L. King, Jr. Street North Complete Streets Resurfacing Opportunities HOUSING, LAND USE, AND TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE MARCH 22, 2018

WEST CERVANTES STREET CORRIDOR. Northwest Florida ROAD DIET CANDIDATE

Presentation Outline. PD&E Study Process Project Overview Proposed Alternatives & Evaluation Schedule Contact Information

Chapter 5 Future Transportation

STRAVA - DATA ACCESS AND USES. March 9, 2016 Shaun Davis + Dewayne Carver Florida Dept. of Transportation

Palm Beach MPO Complete Streets Working Group

1000 FRIENDS OF FLORIDA PALM BEACH COUNTY 2070 OCTOBER 2018

Access Management Regulations and Standards

FM #: ETDM #: 11241

APPENDIX B(2) MULTIMODAL DESIGN STANDARDS FOR MIXED-USE URBAN CENTERS

Dangerous by Design: A challenge for change

Complete Streets Successes, Opportunities, and Challenges

Multimodal Design Guidance. October 23, 2018 ITE Fall Meeting

Twin Cities Regional Bicycle System Study

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION

5 CIRCULATION AND STREET DESIGN

Project Development & Environment (PD&E) Study. November 17, SR 90 (SW 8th Street and SW 7th Street) SW 8 th Street/SW 7 th Street PD&E Study 1

LANE ELIMINATION PROJECTS

Bicycle and Pedestrian Level of Service Evaluation

City of Cape Coral Traffic Calming. City Council May 16,

Pine Hills Road Pedestrian/Bicycle Safety Study Board of County Commissioners Work Session

Facilitating Suburban Bike-to-Rail

Improve the livability of our streets by

Omaha s Complete Streets Policy

ADOT Statewide Bicycle and Pedestrian Program Summary of Phase IV Activities APPENDIX B PEDESTRIAN DEMAND INDEX

APPENDIX D LEVEL OF TRAFFIC STRESS METHODOLOGY

DOWNTOWN MIAMI PEDESTRIAN PRIORITY ZONE

Complete Streets: Policy to Pavement

ADA & Public Rights of Way

TOWN OF PORTLAND, CONNECTICUT COMPLETE STREETS POLICY

Bike/Multipurpose Trail Study for Glynn County, Georgia MAY 16, 2016

City of Gainesville Transportation/Roadway Needs PROJECT SUMMARY

Transportation Policy Manual

Multimodal Through Corridors and Placemaking Corridors

City of Elizabeth City Neighborhood Traffic Calming Policy and Guidelines

Complete Streets 101: The Basics

INDOT Complete Streets Guideline & Policy

HARRISON STREET/OAKLAND AVENUE COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION PLAN

City of Albert Lea Policy and Procedure Manual 4.10 ALBERT LEA CROSSWALK POLICY

o n - m o t o r i z e d transportation is an overlooked element that can greatly enhance the overall quality of life for the community s residents.

San Jose Transportation Policy

Florida Department of Transportation

CURBSIDE ACTIVITY DESIGN

Complete Streets Process and Case Study: Taft / McMillian Two-Way Street Conversion Cincinnati, Ohio. Traffic Engineering Workshop June 4, 2014

GIS Based Data Collection / Network Planning On a City Scale. Healthy Communities Active Transportation Workshop, Cleveland, Ohio May 10, 2011

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT IN SMITHS FALLS, ONTARIO; A COMPARISON BETWEEN TWO SITES

Roadway Classification Design Standards and Policies. Pueblo, Colorado November, 2004

Complete Streets Training. Georgia Municipal Association June 27, 2016

APPENDIX A BICYCLE, PEDESTRIAN, AND TRANSIT ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET. B. Subdivision/Site Development Plan/Grading Permit Name and Number:

Transcription:

Complete Streets and Context Classification April 2017 Secretary s Pedestrian Safety Initiative Dangerous by Design (2011, 2014) Orlando, Tampa, Jacksonville, Miami-Ft. Lauderdale Secretary Ananth Prasad Being #1 in pedestrian fatalities and serious injuries is NOT where Florida wants to be. Florida Department of Transportation 1

Pedestrian Statistics Approximately 500 killed each year Approximately 1,600 seriously injured each year 3% of all traffic crashes, yet 20% of all fatalities Florida Department of Transportation 2

FDOT Complete Streets Policy Adopted September 2014 promotes safety, quality of life, and economic development context sensitive system of Complete Streets. serve the transportation needs of transportation system users of all ages and abilities, including : o Cyclists o Freight handlers o Motorists o Pedestrians o Transit riders Policy adopted in Sept 2014 Implementation Plan Smart Growth America 4 workshops Summer 2015 Implementation Team Approved December 2015 Modifies 12 key documents 3

FDOT Context Classification Defines Approach, Process, Expectations, Best Practices Complete description of context classifications FDOT Design Manual (FDM) Final manual posted November 1, 2017 Implementation date January 1, 2018. Replaces Plans Preparation Manual 4

OVERVIEW 1. What are the FDOT Context Classifications? 2. How will Context Classification be used? 01 WHAT ARE THE FDOT CONTEXT CLASSIFICATIONS? 5

What are the FDOT Context Classifications? C1-Natural C2-Rural C2T-Rural Town C3R-Suburban Residential C3C-Suburban Commercial C4-Urban General C5-Urban Center C6-Urban Core C1-NATURAL Lands preserved in a natural or wilderness condition, including lands unsuitable for settlement due to natural conditions. Not intended for future development. 6

C2-RURAL Sparsely settled lands; may include agricultural land, grassland, woodland, and wetlands. Lands that could be developed in the future. C2T-RURAL TOWN Small concentrations of town area immediately surrounded by rural and natural areas; includes many historic towns. 7

C3R-SUBURBAN RESIDENTIAL Mostly residential uses within large blocks and a disconnected or sparse roadway network. C3C-SUBURBAN COMMERCIAL Mostly non-residential uses with large building footprints and large parking lots within large blocks and a disconnected or sparse roadway network. 8

C4-URBAN GENERAL Mix of uses set within small blocks with a wellconnected roadway network. The roadway network usually connects to residential neighborhoods immediately along the corridor or on the back side of blocks fronting the roadway. C5-URBAN CENTER Mix of uses set within small blocks with a wellconnected roadway network. Typically concentrated around a few blocks and identified as part of a civic or economic center of a community, town, or city. 9

C6-URBAN CORE Areas with the highest densities and building heights, and within FDOT classified Large Urbanized Areas (population >1,000,000). Many are regional centers and destinations. Buildings have mixed uses, are built up to the roadway, and are within a well-connected roadway network. SPECIAL DISTRICTS Areas that do not adhere to context classification measures Have a mix of users that can create unique travel patterns Examples: University campuses Airports Rail yards Ship yards Freight distribution enters Refineries Sports complexes University of Florida, Gainesville, FL Port of Miami, Miami, FL 10

02 HOW WILL CONTEXT CLASSIFICATION BE USED? WHAT DOES CONTEXT CLASSIFICATION TELL YOU ABOUT ROADWAY USERS? Context classification informs planners and engineers about the type and intensity of users along various roadway segments. For example, C4, C5, and C6 context classification will have higher number of pedestrians, bicyclists, and transit users than in a C1, C2, or C3 context classification. C2T will be similar to C4. 11

RELATIONSHIP TO FDM On-street parking may be acceptable in C2T, C4, C5, and C6 if supported by codes and regulations Bulb-outs not required, but may be applied in appropriate contexts Street Trees not required, but lower speeds permit closer placement to face of curb. Clear sight triangles still apply. Sidewalks 6 standard width, but wider in C5 and C6 where possible Application of FDM criteria also influenced by plans, codes, and regulations RELATIONSHIP TO RRR RRR projects have a very short time frame (3 years or less) Criteria in FDM will be used to the extent possible Will not move curb or buy ROW Get ready for RRR start early with your own planning Support RRR with other project funding (goes with) We may have to miss opportunities on early/current projects 12

FDM IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE The FDM will be effective January 1, 2018 Context-based criteria in the FDM will be required on projects that have not begun design by January 1, 2018 For PD&E projects, implementation of context classification and the FDM is required for all projects that have the Public Hearing scheduled in April 2018 or later FDM may be applied earlier at the discretion of the district WHO WILL DETERMINE CONTEXT CLASSIFICATION? District Staff o District can assign staff to oversee context classification evaluation o Multiple offices/groups should be involved o On projects where FDOT currently coordinates with local governments, FDOT should continue to coordinate with local governments to calibrate context classification o Local form-based codes and zoning can be used to inform FDOT s context classification determination Final determination is made by FDOT 13

WHO WILL DETERMINE CONTEXT CLASSIFICATION? Coordinate with the State Complete Streets Program Manager if Special District designation is required Coordinate with District SIS Coordinator if roadways are located on the SIS LOCAL INFLUENCE ON CONTEXT CLASSIFICATION Photo courtesy of Dan Burden Current classification is as-built/conditions today Future changes based on plans, codes, and regulations that support the proposed future use 14

QUESTIONS? DeWayne Carver, AICP FDOT Complete Streets Program Manager Florida Department of Transportation Roadway Design Office www.flcompletestreets.com Dewayne.carver@dot.state.fl.us 850 414 4322 15