Aldridge Transportation Consultants, LLC Advanced Transportation Planning and Traffic Engineering

Similar documents
Aldridge Transportation Consultants, LLC Advanced Transportation Planning and Traffic Engineering

Aldridge Transportation Consultants, LLC Advanced Transportation Planning and Traffic Engineering

URBAN QUARRY HEADQUARTERS 2717 STEVENAGE DRIVE CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW. Prepared for: Urban Quarry 4123 Belgreen Drive, Ottawa K1G 3N2

Traffic Impact Analysis Chatham County Grocery Chatham County, NC

Truck Turning Study for Main Street Intersection, Orange

Traffic Impact Analysis Walton Acres at Riverwood Athletic Club Clayton, NC

FORM A PASCO COUNTY ACCESS CONNECTION PERMIT APPLICATION

Draft Report. Traffic Impact Study. Superstore, Wal-Mart, and Kent Development. Yarmouth, Nova Scotia. Prepared for

Traffic Impact Statement

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY And A TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS FOR A SENIOR LIVING AND APARTMENT DEVELOPMENT

MEMORANDUM. Nantasket Road at Kingsley Road Kingsley Road at Sumner Street Kingsley Road at Revere Street Kingsley Road at Kenberma Street

Practical Application of Turn Lane Design Criteria in Developing Suburban & Urban Corridors

Overland Traffic Consultants, Inc. October 15, Mr. Bruce McBride Project Delivery Analysts, LLC Shawnee Street Moorpark, CA 93021

TRAFFIC STUDY. Birch Bluff Road / Pleasant Avenue 01/15/2018. City of Tonka Bay 4901 Manitou Road Tonka Bay, MN WSB PROJECT NO.

1609 E. FRANKLIN STREET HOTEL TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

FRONT RANGE CROSSINGS TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY

JONESBORO HIGHWAY 63 HIGHWAY 18 CONNECTOR STUDY

KDOT Access Management Policy (AMP)

Truck Climbing Lane Traffic Justification Report

Transportation Impact Study for Abington Terrace

Appendix C. NORTH METRO STATION AREA TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT 88th Avenue Station

LSC TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC. 516 North Tejon Street Colorado Springs, CO (719) FAX (719)

Traffic Impact Study WestBranch Residential Development Davidson, NC March 2016

Meadowlake Ranch Traffic Impact Analysis (LSC #184600) August 27, 2018

Exam 2. Two-Lane Highway Capacity and LOS Analysis. Two-lane Highway Characteristics. LOS Considerations 10/24/2009

Traffic Circulation Study for Neighborhood Southwest of Mockingbird Lane and Airline Road, Highland Park, Texas

Figure 1: Vicinity Map of the Study Area

Troutbeck Farm Development

Transportation Impact Study. Eagle, Colorado. Frost Creek. Revised March 25, November 30, for PREPARED FOR: PREPARED BY:

PINESTONE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY Travelers Rest, South Carolina

6060 North Central Expressway Mixed-Use Site Dallas, Texas

MEDICAL/OFFICE BUILDING 1637 BANK STREET OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW. Prepared for:

King Soopers #116 Thornton, Colorado

Traffic Impact Study Little Egypt Road Development Denver, North Carolina June 2017

Information on display. Inside this handout. Triangle Area revisions. Project need displays. Preferred alternative on aerial maps

Overview. Updated pictures of the intersection are shown in Exhibits 1 thru 4, and the aerial photo provided by Google Maps is shown in Exhibit 5.

INNOVATIVE INTERSECTION DESIGN

Guidance for Installation of Pedestrian Crosswalks on Michigan State Trunkline Highways

TRANSPORTATION & MOBILITY

Highway 49, Highway 351 and Highway 91 Improvements Feasibility Study Craighead County

INDUSTRIAL BUILDING 1660 COMSTOCK ROAD CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW. Prepared for:

Include autoturn exhibits of WB-67 trucks at each roundabout.

City of Prince Albert Statement of POLICY and PROCEDURE. Department: Public Works Policy No. 66. Section: Transportation Issued: July 14, 2014

CarMax Auto Superstore/ Reconditioning Center #6002 Murrieta, California

ENHANCED PARKWAY STUDY: PHASE 2 CONTINUOUS FLOW INTERSECTIONS. Final Report

3.0 Future Conditions

Dr. Naveed Anwar Executive Director, AIT Consulting Affiliated Faculty, Structural Engineering Director, ACECOMS

THE LANDMARK AT TALBOT PARK

To: ACHD Commissioners and Director 3/14/2017. Peer Review of Highlands Neighborhood Traffic and Pedestrian Safety Plan Information Briefing

CHAPTER 3A. GENERAL PAGE CHAPTER 3B. PAVEMENT AND CURB MARKINGS PAGE

Glenn Avenue Corridor Traffic Operational Evaluation

THE FUTURE OF THE TxDOT ROADWAY DESIGN MANUAL

El Paso County 2040 Major Transportation Corridors Plan

3.9 - Transportation and Traffic

December 9, Mr. Robert Leslie, AICP Director of Planning Town of Bethlehem 445 Delaware Avenue Delmar, NY 12054

GWINNETT COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

HENDERSON DEVELOPMENT 213, 217, 221, 221 ½, 223 HENDERSON AVENUE and 65 TEMPLETON STREET OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW.

Peer Review of Highlands Neighborhood Traffic and Pedestrian Safety Plan

This Chapter sets forth the minimum design, technical criteria and specifications to be used in the preparation of all roadway plans.

2009 PE Review Course Traffic! STUDIES. Shawn Leight, P.E., PTOE, PTP Crawford Bunte Brammeier Washington University

ATTACHMENT NO. 18 GMI-C. National Committee on Uniform Traffic Control Devices GMI SIGNS TECHNICAL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

HOLIDAY INN HOTEL 235 KING EDWARD AVENUE CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for:

List of Attachments. Location Map... Site Plan... City of Lake Elsinore Circulation Element... City of Lake Elsinore Roadway Cross-Sections...

D.13 Transportation and Traffic

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. Creekside Thornton, Colorado. For. August 2015 November 2015 Revised: August Prepared for:

TENW Transportation Engineering NorthWest

Attachment No. 17 GMI No. 1. National Committee on Uniform Traffic Control Devices GMI SIGNS TECHNICAL COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

DOWNTOWN TUPELO MAIN STREET: ROAD DIET STUDY

Route 28 (South Orleans Road)/Route 39 (Harwich Road)/Quanset Road Intersection

Transportation Knowledge

May 5, 2009 File:

Community Advisory Committee

Basic Freeways and Multilane Highways (LOS) CIVL 4162/6162

February 10, 2015 Project: P

Trip Generation for an averaged sized elementary school in Provo, Utah

Transportation Advisory Board

Highway Capacity and LOS. Reading Assignment: pgs

Public Information Meeting. Warren County Pathway Corridor Project September 27, 2018

Traffic Impact Study. Westlake Elementary School Westlake, Ohio. TMS Engineers, Inc. June 5, 2017

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY CRITERIA

TRAFFIC STUDY GUIDELINES Clarksville Street Department

Government of the District of Columbia Department of Transportation

CITY OF VAUGHAN EXTRACT FROM COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 15, 2016

Grade Separated Intersection

Date: September 7, Project #: Re: Spaulding Youth Center Northfield, NH Property. Traffic Impact Study

T R A N S P O R T A T I O N M E M O R A N D U M

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

MOVEABLE BARRIER. Congestion Management Solutions

NEW YORK CENTRAL PARK SUBDIVISION BLAIS STREET/ST-PIERRE STREET EMBRUN, ONTARIO TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. Prepared for:

RURAL HIGHWAY SHOULDERS THAT ACCOMMODATE BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN USE (TxDOT Project ) June 7, Presented by: Karen Dixon, Ph.D., P.E.

Memorandum. Sunday, July 13, Saturday, July 19, 2014

QUICKIE C STORE AND GAS BAR 1780 HERON ROAD OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for:

5858 N COLLEGE, LLC N College Avenue Traffic Impact Study

ACCESS MANAGEMENT PLAN: BLUFFTON PARKWAY BLUFFTON PARKWAY: PHASE FOUR TOWN OF BLUFFTON & BEAUFORT COUNTY, SC

P HA Transportation Consultants

Chapter 33. Grade Separated Intersection Overview Classification of Intersection Grade Separated Intersection

Access Location, Spacing, Turn Lanes, and Medians

4.0 ACCESS CONTROL PLAN - SH 14 (JEFFERSON STREET/RIVERSIDE AVENUE)

Traffic Study of Fuller Street, Cady Street, West Street and West Avenue. Final Report

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS. Photo here CAL MET ROYAL MRF EXPANSION. City of Paramount, CA. arch beach C O N S U L T I N G.

Transcription:

Advanced Transportation Planning and Traffic Engineering John M.W. Aldridge, PE, PTOE, AICP 1082 Chimney Rock Road Colorado Licensed Professional Engineer Highlands Ranch, CO 80126 303-703-9112 Mobile: 303-594-4132 Email: john@atceng.com April 2, 2018 Mr. Eric Wernsman Wernsman Engineering and Land Development, LLC 1011 42 nd St. Evans, CO 80620 RE: Traffic Impact Analysis Expedition Water Solutions #8 Site Weld County, CO Dear Mr. Wernsman: This technical letter provides an analysis of the potential impact occasioned by a 154 acre saltwater disposal site on the southwest corner of WCR-90 and WCR-39 which is to the northeast of Ault, Colorado. The aerial photo shows the location and on the site. The site will be accessible from two locations on the north side from WCR-90. The eastern access is 660 feet from WCR-39 and the western access is another 330 feet west of WCR-39. The saltwater disposal facility will employ up to 10 persons per 24-hour period. It will process a maximum of 100 trucks per day spread out over a 24-hour period. The average weekday number of trucks is about 80. Existing Conditions In this area, WCR-90 is a two-lane paved collector roadway that carries 870 vehicles per day according to a April 2017 traffic count taken by Weld County. The Weld County 2035 Transportation Plan reports that it is 29 feet wide and in fair condition. The plan indicates that the capacity of the roadway is 4,600 ADT. WCR-39 is a two-lane local gravel road

Page 2 of 4 Impacts Trip Generation The following table show the type of vehicle and average number of daily round trips. Type of Vehicle Average Number of Round Trips/Day a) Passenger cars/pickups 10 b) Tandem Trucks c) Semi-Truck/Trailer/RV 80 Expected Vehicle Routes and Trip Distribution According the operator of the facility, the trucks will split about 50/50 to/from the east and of the site on WCR-90. This is based on the general location of the wells that they will serve. Peak Hour of Usage The facility operates on a 24-hour basis and as such there is no typical peak hour of usage that being the peak hour of the adjacent street between 7 and 9 AM and 4 and 6 PM. Generally, trucks will start loading water after 7 AM and not arrive at the disposal site to unload water until after 9 AM. There may be shift changes with a couple of workers during the morning peak hour likely using passenger car or pick-up trucks. During the afternoon peak hour (4 to 6 PM) there may be another shift change. Trucks in an out during that time are random and unpredictable. Nonetheless, for analysis purposes, a standard 10 percent of average daily traffic is assumed. At 10 percent of the average daily, this equates to 9 trips entering and 9 trips exiting the facility. 4-5 vehicles will enter and exit to/from the east and 4-5 vehicles will enter and exit to/from the west. Note that passenger car equivalents (pce) are not applicable to the turning volume warrant in this case. The left turn lane volume warrants in standard traffic engineering documents do not differentiate cars from trucks. Passenger car equivalents are more appropriately used to determine the length of queues and design of storage lanes. Furthermore, a left turn lane can be dropped if the opposing volume is equal to or less than 100 vehicles per hour. In this case, assuming the peak hour is 10 percent of the daily (870 ADT) and a standard 55/45 directional split, the maximum opposing volume is approximately 48 vehicles per hour. Mitigation Based on the above information, the owner/operator of the facility agrees to the improvement triggers below:

Page 3 of 4 a) 200 vpd or significant dust as identified by County-Mag-Chloride dust abatement b) 300 vpd alternative pavement c) 400 vpd pavement The vehicles per day triggers are not applicable as WCR-90 is paved. d) 10 vph during peak hour turning left into the facility left turn deceleration lane e) 25 vph during peak hour turning right into the facility right turn deceleration lane f) 50 vph during peak hour turning right out of the facility right turn acceleration lane. The vehicles per hour triggers for deceleration or acceleration lanes are not met. Conclusions Based on this analysis, the present roadway surface, access configuration, and traffic control will adequately handle, without improvements, the truck traffic generated by the saltwater disposal facility. Should you have any questions or need additional information please call me at 303-703- 9112. Respectfully submitted: Aldridge Transportation Consultants, LLC John M.W. Aldridge, P.E. Principal JMWA/me

Page 4 of 4

Advanced Transportation Planning and Traffic Engineering John M.W. Aldridge, PE, PTOE, AICP 1082 Chimney Rock Road Colorado Licensed Professional Engineer Highlands Ranch, CO 80126 303-703-9112 Mobile: 303-594-4132 Email: john@atceng.com March 1, 2018 Mr. Eric Wernsman Wernsman Engineering and Land Development, LLC 1011 42 nd St. Evans, CO 80620 RE: Traffic Impact Analysis Expedition Water Solutions #8 Site Weld County, CO Dear Mr. Wernsman: This technical letter provides an analysis of the potential impact occasioned by a 154 acre saltwater disposal site on the southwest corner of WCR-90 and WCR-39 which is to the northeast of Ault, Colorado. The aerial photo shows the location and on the site. The site will be accessible from two locations on the north side from WCR-90. The eastern access is 660 feet from WCR-39 and the western access is another 330 feet west of WCR-39. The saltwater disposal facility will employ up to 10 persons per 24-hour period. It will process a maximum of 100 trucks per day spread out over a 24-hour period. Existing Conditions In this area, WCR-90 is a two-lane paved collector roadway that carries 870 vehicles per day according to a April 2017 traffic count taken by Weld County. The Weld County 2035 Transportation Plan reports that it is 29 feet wide and in fair condition. The plan indicates that the capacity of the roadway is 4,600 ADT. WCR-39 is a two-lane local gravel road

Page 2 of 3 Impacts Trip Generation The following table show the type of vehicle and number of daily round trips. Type of Vehicle Number of Round Trips/Day a) Passenger cars/pickups 10 b) Tandem Trucks c) Semi-Truck/Trailer/RV 100 Expected Vehicle Routes and Trip Distribution According the operator of the facility, the trucks will split about 50/50 to/from the east and of the site on WCR-90. This is based on the general location of the wells that they will serve. Peak Hour of Usage The facility operates on a 24-hour basis and as such there is no particular peak hour of usage. Nonetheless, for analysis purposes, a standard 10 percent of daily traffic is assumed. At 10 percent of the daily, this equates to 11 trips entering and 11 trips exiting the facility. 5-6 vehicles will enter and exit to/from the east and 5-6 vehicles will enter and exit to/from the west. Mitigation Based on the above information, the owner/operator of the facility agrees to the improvement triggers below: a) 200 vpd or significant dust as identified by County-Mag-Chloride dust abatement b) 300 vpd alternative pavement c) 400 vpd pavement The vehicles per day triggers are not applicable as WCR-90 is paved. d) 10 vph during peak hour turning left into the facility left turn deceleration lane e) 25 vph during peak hour turning right into the facility right turn deceleration lane f) 50 vph during peak hour turning right out of the facility right turn acceleration lane. The vehicles per hour triggers for deceleration or acceleration lanes are not met.

Page 3 of 3 Conclusions Based on this analysis, the present roadway surface, access configuration, and traffic control will adequately handle, without improvements, the truck traffic generated by the saltwater disposal facility. Should you have any questions or need additional information please call me at 303-703- 9112. Respectfully submitted: Aldridge Transportation Consultants, LLC John M.W. Aldridge, P.E. Principal JMWA/me ATC is professional service firm specializing in traffic engineering and transportation planning. ATC s principal, John M.W. Aldridge, is a Colorado licensed professional engineer. In the past 20 years, ATC has prepared over 1,000 traffic impact studies, designed over 100 traffic signals, and has provided expert witness testimony on engineering design and access issues on multi-million-dollar interchange and highway projects in Kansas and Colorado.