IRB Training October 22, 2015

Similar documents
SOP Title Review of Research: Devices for Humanitarian Uses

HUD and HDE Topics. Humanitarian Use Device and. Humanitarian Use Device. Humanitarian Device Exemption

Humanitarian Use Devices Made Simple

EMERGENCY USE 03/02/2016

Date Effective 4/21/2008 Identification

Investigator Manual. If you have questions about whether an activity requires IRB review, contact the IRB Office.

Policy Number: 42 Title: Investigational Devices Date of Last Revision: 06/12/2008; 07/22/2010; 05/29/2013; 05/01/2016; 10/16/2018

Current Status: Active PolicyStat ID: Origination: 04/2018 Effective: 04/2018 Approved: 04/2018 Last Revised: 04/2018 Expiration: 04/2021

Effective Date: January 16, 2012 Policy Number: MHC_RP0107. Revised Date: November 2, 2015 Oversight Level: Corporate

Human Subjects in Research Review and Monitoring Form. Not applicable

What s New in GCP? FDA, OHRP Issue Harmonized Guidance on Transferring IRB Oversight of Clinical Studies

SOP 801: Investigator Qualifications and Responsibilities

Human Research Protections Program Medical College of Wisconsin and Froedtert Memorial Lutheran Hospital

Chapter 4 Institutional Review Board (IRB) Roles and Authorities

IV. Basic Procedures for Human Research Protections

Institutional Review Board Responsibilities in making the Significant Risk and Non-significant Risk Device Determination

NONCOMPLIANCE. 1. Overview

Yale University Human Research Protection Program

EXPEDITED REVIEW. Terms used in this policy, but not defined herein shall have the meanings set forth in the Glossary.

CONTINUING REVIEW OF APPROVED IRB PROTOCOLS

WORKING WITH THE INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD &

Children s Hospital of Philadelphia Committees for the Protection of Human Subjects Policies and Procedures. IRB Review Processes

UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD CONTINUING REVIEW AND REAPPROVAL OF RESEARCH

MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTION PROGRAM. Collaborative Research and Performance Sites (01-23) Approved

Arkansas Tech University Institutional Review Board

Issue in IRB Approvals:

Institutional Review Board - Restriction s Impo sed

Reporting an Unanticipated Problem Involving Risks to Subjects or Others (UPIRTSO) to the IRB

CONTINUING REVIEW CRITERIA FOR RENEWAL

CONTINUING REVIEW 3/7/2016

CUNY HRPP Procedures: Multisite Non-Exempt Human Subjects Research

Wayne State University Institutional Review Board

To assure knowledge and compliance by documenting the annual administrative review and continuing IRB review of non-exempt projects for the IRB.

IRB Chair Responsibilities

IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY Institutional Review Board. Policy on IRB Review of Protocol Deviations and Noncompliance for Non-exempt Research

THE DUHS IRB REVIEW PROCESS 8/13/2014

Title: EXPEDITED IRB REVIEW OF HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH

CONTINUING REVIEW CRITERIA FOR RENEWAL

Ceded IRB Review. The project involves prisoners or other vulnerable populations that require special considerations.

Effective Date Revisions Date Review by the Convened Institutional Review Board

Supersedes Document Dated: 7/7/11. SOP: RR 401 Version No.: 07 Version Date: 9/8/15 EXPEDITED REVIEW 1. POLICY

21 CFR Part 56 - Institutional Review Boards

SOP 407: PROTOCOL DEVIATIONS AND UNANTICIPATED PROBLEMS

OHRP Guidance on Written IRB Procedures

Signature Date Date First Effective: Signature Date Revision Date:

Michigan State University Human Research Protection Program

SOP #2-2 Version #1 Date First Effective: December 14, Page 1 of 6

AMENDMENTS TO PREVIOUSLY APPROVED RESEARCH 3/01/2016

Independent Ethics Committees

FDA s Guidance on Using a Centralized IRB Review Process in Multicenter Clinical Trials

JUN L WARNING LETTER VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS

Procedure Department: HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTIONS PROGRAM Policy Number: II.B.1

Ceded IRB Review. The University of Arizona has standing agreements in place for the following entities regarding ceded IRB review:

Signature Date Date First Effective: Signature Date Revision Date: 07/18/2011

Review of Research by the Convened IRB

The IRB reviews and monitors human subjects research conducted by Columbia College Chicago faculty, staff, and students.

Institutional Review Board Standard Operating Procedure. Suspension and Termination of IRB Approval

POLICY NO EXEMPT RESEARCH... 4 POLICY NO DISCLOSURE OF RESEARCH LAB TEST RESULTS... 5

Research Involving Human Subjects: AA 110.7

IRB MEETING ADMINISTRATION

Initial Review. Approved By: Michele Kennett, JD, MSN, LLM Associate Vice Chancellor for Research. Table of Contents

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN S E RVICES, 'mgr,':~~ MAY WARNING LETTE R

Human Research Protection Program Policy

HEALTH CARE SYSTEMS RESEARCH NETWORK

Children s Hospital of Philadelphia Committees for the Protection of Human Subjects Policies and Procedures Continuing Review of Approved Research

Yale University Institutional Review Boards

DOCUMENTATION OF IRB DISCUSSIONS AND DECISIONS ( IRB MINUTES)

Administrative Hold, Suspension, or Termination of IRB Approval

I. Summary. II. Responsibilities

Submitting Continuing Reviews and/or Amendments to the IRB

SOP 903: HRPP AND NON-COMPLIANCE

IRB Myths & Misconceptions: Myths Busted Kelly Kidner, CIP & Stacie Fujisaki, CIP

I. Summary. II. Responsibilities

Harford Community College. Institutional Review Board Charter and Standard Operating Procedures

USC Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

7.0 DEVIATION and EXCEPTION of a PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PROTOCOL

INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD (IRB) PROCEDURES

Institutional Review Board (IRB) Policies and Procedures Manual

The Top 10 Human Research Protection Compliance Risks

THERAPEUTIC USE EXEMPTION POLICY U.S. ANTI-DOPING AGENCY. Effective JANUARY 1, (Revised June 21, 2018)

UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD PROCEDURES FOR FULL BOARD REVIEW

SOP 5.06 Full Committee Review: Initial IRB Review

Florida State University IRB Standard Operational Procedures

Guidance for IRBs, Clinical Investigators, and Sponsors IRB Continuing Review after Clinical Investigation Approval

Via Federal Express Rockville, MD 20850

FDA > CDRH > CFR Title 21 Database Search. Registration Listing Adverse Events Advisory Committees. 21 CFR Part 56

Minot State University Institutional Review Board ANNUAL UPDATE/REVISION/PROJECT COMPLETION REPORT

Baptist Health Institutional Review Board. Study Closure Report (Expedited Review) IRB #: Study Title:

Version 1. Submission Guide and Policies

IRB Minutes Quality Improvement Assessment

UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD CONTINUING REVIEW OF RESEARCH

Study Management SM STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR Interactions with the Institutional Review Board (IRB)

IRB APPLICATION CHECKLIST

SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTION PROGRAM STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES

(y9. &i?r, JUL t Certified-Return Receipt Requested WARNING LE7TER

IRB MEMBERSHIP COMPOSITION, ROLES AND RESPONSIBILIES

COMPLIANCE MONITORING

UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA Institutional Review Board

2.0 Institutional Review Board

IRB COMPOSITION AND IRB MEMBER ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES

Transcription:

Humanitarian Use Devices & Humanitarian Device Exemptions IRB Training October 22, 2015

What is a Humanitarian Use Device (HUD)? Intended to benefit patients in the treatment or diagnosis of diseases or conditions that affect or are manifested in fewer than 4,000 individuals in the US per year.

Humanitarian Device Exemption (HDE) Certain statutes and regulations need not be followed in order to legally market a HUD HDE approval is based on safety and probable benefit HDEs are exempt from the requirement to provide a reasonable assurance of effectiveness

FDA Considers HDE Application Comparable device: Not available to treat or diagnose the disease or condition Available under another approved HDE application Studied under an approved Investigational Device Exemption (IDE)

HUD Use v. Investigation TREATMENT INVESTIGATIONAL Approved for marketing? YES NO (unless approved indication) IDE required? NO YES (unless approved indication) FDA IDE regulations apply? NO YES Initial IRB Review? CONVENED CONVENED Continuing Review? EXPEDITE CONVENED Research Informed Consent? NO YES HIPAA Authorization or Waiver? NO YES Medical Device Report to FDA / IRB? YES YES Sell for profit? NO* NO*

Decision Tree for IRB Review of HUDs U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for HDE Holders, Institutional Review Boards (IRBs), Clinical Investigators, and FDA Staff - Humanitarian Device Exemption (HDE) Regulation: Questions and Answers. July 8, 2010.

Humanitarian Use Device and Humanitarian Device Exemption A Humanitarian Use Device (HUD) is a device that is intended to benefit patients by treating or diagnosing a disease or condition that affects or is manifested in fewer than 4,000 individuals in the United States per year.

Humanitarian Use Device and Humanitarian Device Exemption To obtain approval for an HUD, an humanitarian device exemption (HDE) application is submitted to FDA. An HDE application is not required to contain the results of scientifically valid clinical investigations demonstrating that the device is effective for its intended purpose.

Humanitarian Use Device and Humanitarian Device Exemption The application must contain sufficient information for the FDA to determine that the device does not pose an unreasonable or significant risk of illness or injury, and that the probable benefit to health outweighs the risk of injury or illness from its use.

Humanitarian Use Device and Humanitarian Device Exemption Additionally, the applicant must demonstrate that no comparable devices are available to treat or diagnose the disease or condition, and that they could not otherwise bring the device to market.

Humanitarian Use Device and Humanitarian Device Exemption An approved HDE authorizes marketing of the HUD. An HUD may only be used in facilities that have established a local IRB to supervise clinical testing of devices, and after an IRB has approved the use of the device to treat or diagnose the specific disease.

Humanitarian Use Device and Humanitarian Device Exemption The labeling for an HUD must state that the device is an humanitarian use device and that, although the device is authorized by Federal Law, the effectiveness of the device for the specific indication has not been demonstrated.

What are some of the differences between an HDE and IDE? FDA approval of an HDE authorizes an applicant to market a HUD in accordance with approved labeling and indications for use, subject to certain restrictions. If a HUD meets the HDE standards for approval, it is exempt from the requirement of establishing a reasonable assurance of effectiveness.

What are some of the differences between an HDE and IDE? A device being used under an approved IDE is a device that has not been cleared or approved by FDA for marketing but has been authorized for investigational use in an FDA-regulated clinical investigation.

What are some of the differences between an HDE and IDE? With this exemption, the investigational device can be shipped lawfully for the purposes of conducting clinical investigations of the device without complying with certain other requirements of the FD&C Act that would apply to devices in commercial distribution.

Should an IRB be concerned if there is a HUD that is approved under an HDE for one indication, while being studied or marketed for another indication that was not approved under an HDE? No. A HUD may be used in accordance with its approved indications for use while being studied under an IDE for a different indication.

Who is responsible for submitting materials to and obtaining approval from the IRB before the HUD is used at a facility? The HDE holder is responsible for ensuring that the HUD is administered only in facilities with properly constituted and functioning IRBs.

Who is responsible for submitting materials to and obtaining approval from the IRB before the HUD is used at a facility? The health care provider at such facilities should be responsible for obtaining IRB approval before use of the HUD, except in certain emergencies where prior IRB approval is not required.

To what extent should an IRB exercise oversight of clinician responsibilities in the use of a HUD? The IRB is not required to review and approve each individual use of a HUD. Rather, the IRB may use its discretion to determine how to approve use of a HUD. In reviewing the use of the HUD, IRBs should be cognizant that the FDA has made a determination of safety and probable benefit for use of the HUD only within its approved indication(s).

What types of review functions are IRBs responsible for with respect to HUDs? IRBs are responsible for initial as well as continuing review of the HUD. For initial review of a HUD, IRBs are required to perform their review at a convened meeting. For continuing review, IRBs may use the expedited review procedures.

Should an IRB be concerned if an HDE holder charges for a HUD? HDE holders may generally charge for the HUD that is used to treat or diagnose a patient. However, unless FDA determines that the HUD qualifies for an exception, HUDs cannot be sold for a price that exceeds the costs of research and development, fabrication, and distribution of the device.

Should an IRB be concerned if an HDE holder charges for a HUD? If a HUD is studied in a clinical investigation for a new indication, the sponsor of the clinical investigation cannot charge subjects or investigators a price higher than necessary to recover the costs of manufacture, research, development, and handling. Any costs for which a subject in a clinical investigation is responsible must, when appropriate, be provided in the informed consent document.

What information should be given to patients before they receive a HUD, and should patients consent to the HUD use? Neither the FD&C Act nor the regulations require informed consent from patients for the use of a HUD for its HDE-approved indication. An IRB may, however, choose to require informed consent that is consistent with the approved labeling when the IRB approves use of the HUD in a facility.

What information should be given to patients before they receive a HUD, and should patients consent to the HUD use? Most HDE holders develop patient information packets that generally contain a discussion of the potential risks and benefits of the HUD

What should IRBs tell physicians who want to study a HUD for a new indication? Physicians who want to study a HUD for a new indication must submit an IDE application to FDA if the device is a significant risk device

When can a HUD be used without prior IRB approval? If a physician in an emergency situation determines that IRB approval for the use of the HUD at the facility cannot be obtained in time to prevent serious harm or death to a patient, a HUD may be used without prior IRB approval.

When can a HUD be used without prior IRB approval? The physician must, within 5 days after the emergency use of the device, provide written notification of the use to the IRB chair person. The written notification must include the identification of the patient involved, the date of the use, and the reason for the use.

After an IRB approves the use of the HUD at the facility, can a physician use a HUD outside its approved indication in an emergency or if the physician determines there is no alternative device for the patient s condition? The FDA has made a determination of safety and probable benefit for use of a HUD approved under an HDE only within its approved indication.

If a physician wants to use a HUD outside its approved indication, FDA recommends that the physician obtain informed consent from the patient and ensure that reasonable patient protection measures are followed.

The FDA recommends that the physician submit a follow-up report on the patient s condition to the HDE holder and first check with the IRB before such use to review any institutional policy. The extent of IRB oversight in these circumstances is up to the IRB.