Mission Bay Loop (MBL) Public Meeting

Similar documents
TRAFFIC ACTION PLAN. Laurie Meadows Neighborhood CITY OF SAN MATEO

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

Caltrans Sloat Boulevard Pedestrian Safety Project Response to Community Questions, Comments & Concerns

Bicycle Network. Vision Zero San Francisco The City and County of San

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

Project Goals and Objectives

Mission-Geneva Transportation Study Community Workshop 2 July 8, 2006

25th Avenue Road Diet Project A One Year Evaluation. Transportation Fund for Clean Air Project #05R07

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

Project Goal and Description. Why Broadway? Broadway SFMTA.COM/BROADWAY. The goal of the Broadway Safety Improvement

FOLSOM-HOWARD STREETSCAPE OVERVIEW

Active Transportation Facility Glossary

Improving Cyclist Safety at the Dundas Street West and Sterling Road Intersection

Upper Market Street Bike Lane Project

Summary: Mercer County Princeton Avenue & Spruce Street Study January 2009

Northbound San Jose Avenue & I-280 Off-Ramp Road Diet Pilot Project

Protected Bike Lanes in San Francisco Mike Sallaberry SFMTA NACTO Workshop - Chicago IL

MEMORANDUM. Charlotte Fleetwood, Transportation Planner

Public Information Centre

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

Welcome! San Jose Avenue Open House August 25, 2015

Providence Downtown Transit Connector STAKEHOLDER MEETING #2. Stakeholder Meeting #1 October 24, 2016

CURBSIDE ACTIVITY DESIGN

CITY OF OTTAWA ROADWAY MODIFICATION APPROVAL UNDER DELEGATED AUTHORITY

Geary Corridor Bus Rapid Transit

Polk Streetscape Project

The Wiggle Route in Context

ABOUT THIS OPEN HOUSE

Better Market Street Project Update. Urban Forestry Council September 17, 2014

LSC TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC. 516 North Tejon Street Colorado Springs, CO (719) FAX (719)

MASONIC AVENUE STREET DESIGN STUDY Community Workshop 2. Masonic Ave Street Design Study Community Workshop 2 August 10, 2010

1 st and 2 nd Street Couplet FAQ s

Southwest Bus Rapid Transit (SW BRT) Functional Planning Study - Executive Summary January 19 LPT ATTACHMENT 2.

Addendum to Mitigated Negative Declaration

Memorandum. Sunday, July 13, Saturday, July 19, 2014

Implementing the Three Es of School Zone Traffic Calming

AGENDA REPORT. Issue: Discussion of potential improvements on Barnwell Road at Niblick Drive

Draft North Industrial Area-Wide Traffic Plan

Freeway ramp intersection study

Better Market Street Project. Project Update January 15, 2015

BALBOA AREA: TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS & PLANNING

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

2014/2015 BIKE ROUTE PLAN 83 AVENUE PROTECTED BIKE LANE

EUCLID AVENUE PARKING STUDY CITY OF SYRACUSE, ONONDAGA COUNTY, NEW YORK

North Shore Transportation Improvement Strategy

Chapter 3.3 Horizon Elementary School. Volusia County MPO. June 2009

C C C

PROJECT OVERVIEW. 20th Avenue Project Limits (Lincoln Way to Wawona St)

Pedestrian Road Safety Audit

Governance and Priorities Committee Report For the July 2, 2015 Meeting

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

Geary Bus Rapid Transit Project

Tunnel Reconstruction South 5 th Street Association October 16, 2018

June 29, Dear Mr. Walter:

Downtown BRT Corridor Alternatives Review: 1 st, 2 nd, 3 rd and 4 th Avenue. Bus Rapid and Conventional Transit Planning and Design Services

Cycle Track Design Best Practices Cycle Track Sections

20 th Avenue Neighborway Project August 2, Second Open House

WELCOME Mission-Geneva Transportation Study

2014/2015 BIKE ROUTE PLAN 83 AVENUE PROTECTED BIKE LANE

HIGHBURY AVENUE/HAMILTON ROAD INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS PUBLIC INFORMATION CENTRE 1 MAY 14, 2015

CITY OF LOS ANGELES INTER-DEPARTMENTAL MEMORANDUM

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

Pedestrian and Bicycle Improvements in Balboa Park Station Area

Borough of Danville, PA Traffic Calming Program Guidelines

Complete Street Analysis of a Road Diet: Orange Grove Boulevard, Pasadena, CA

Public Works Committee Meeting Richard E. Mastrangelo Council Chamber November 20, 2017

WELCOME Public Information Centre

Military Road Safety Improvements

Eliminate on-street parking where it will allow for a dedicated bus only lane %

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

5 Transit & Traffic. Overview

BD RESOLUTION NO RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE VISION ZERO RAMP INTERSECTION STUDY PHASE 1

Purpose and Need. Chapter Introduction. 2.2 Project Purpose and Need Project Purpose Project Need

Data Analysis February to March Identified safety needs from reported collisions and existing travel patterns.

Display Boards Including Five Refined Design Concepts

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

1. Operate along freeways, either in regular traffic lanes, in high-occupancy vehicle (HOV) lanes, or along the shoulders.

City of Vestavia Hills Traffic Calming Policy for Residential Streets

TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS REPORT US Route 6 Huron, Erie County, Ohio

SCHOOL ROUTE PLAN. For HUNTER S CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL LOCATION 14 ORANGE COUNTY. Prepared for:

Classification Criteria

APPENDIX 2 LAKESHORE ROAD TRANSPORTATION REVIEW STUDY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY Order # 5883 FOR PUBLIC HEARING

Off-road Trails. Guidance

San Francisco 2009 Collisions Report April 21, 2011

ABOUT THIS STUDY The Tenderloin-Little Saigon Community-Based Transportation Plan

Washington St. Corridor Study

Seattle Department of Transportation (SDOT) Preliminary Responses to Madison-Miller Community List of Site-Specific Concerns

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY BOARD OF DIRECTORS. RESOLUTION No

Windy Ridge Elementary School

Lake Whitney Elementary School

Newport City Thoroughfare Plan

M14A/D Select Bus Service

Central Avenue Bikeway Traffic and Safety Impact Assessment

Better Market Street. Engineering, Maintenance & Safety Committee (EMSC) February 28, 2018

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

Tonight is for you. Learn everything you can. Share all your ideas.

Tunnel Reconstruction Brooklyn CB 1 August 14, 2018

3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION

5. RUNNINGWAY GUIDELINES

Transcription:

Mission Bay Loop (MBL) Public Meeting La Scuola Internazionale di San Francisco, November 18, 2014 Frequently Asked Questions 1. When would construction have to start before the SFMTA loses TIGER funds? There are two independent pieces of the project: street improvements and the transit (rail) Loop. The Mission Bay Development Group (MBDG) is responsible for the street improvements and the SFMTA is responsible for the Loop. Construction had to begin by February 2, 2014 to meet the terms of the TIGER Grant Agreement. This deadline was met by MBDG. However, under the terms of the TIGER Grant Agreement, funds would need to be spent by September 30, 2018 before the Grant Agreement terminates. 2. How does the MBL serve the Dogpatch Neighborhood and Pier 70? Although they will be south of the Mission Bay Loop, the Dogpatch Neighborhood and Pier 70 will still have very frequent service. The proposed service levels for 2019 match the current N Judah service, which is the most frequent LRV line in the Muni system. Furthermore, the Mission Bay Loop benefits the entire T line in two ways: 1) the MBL will help the SFMTA maintain even spacing throughout the line and respond more efficiently to breakdowns, delays and gaps in service; 2) the Loop also allows the SFMTA to run increased frequency on the heaviest ridership portion of the route. Providing this extra service will reduce crowding and pass ups for the customers traveling further south. 3. What permits will be issued in order for construction to begin? The SFMTA is not required to take out permits from other City agencies. 4. When and why did the SFMTA take the passenger boarding platform on Illinois Street off the table? The passenger boarding platform on Illinois Street was taken out because use of the Mission Bay Loop would only be during certain times (e.g., peak periods), and a boarding platform was not included as part of the project. Also, inconsistently used stops cause confusion to our riders. 5. Can the unused tracks be filled to prevent bicycle and pedestrian accidents? The existing Union Pacific tracks on Illinois Street between 18 th and 19 th Streets, as well as approximately 25 feet both north and south of those intersections, will be removed as part of the project.

6. How will the SFMTA address parents and teachers concerns for schoolchildren s health and physical safety near the project area? During the construction period, the contractor must comply with all City requirements with respect to noise, dust, and other environmental concerns. Pedestrian and bicycle access between school and the waterfront will be maintained during construction. The SFMTA will arrange the most efficient drop-off zones possible with the individual schools. The SFMTA undertakes the following measures to address safety and security concerns throughout the city: a. In February 2014, the SFMTA joined the San Francisco Board of Supervisors in adopting Vision Zero : a policy to eliminate all traffic deaths in San Francisco by 2024. (San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency, 2014) b. The SFMTA s Sustainable Streets Division implemented the following safety initiatives to increase the safety of passengers, employees, and the public: Pedestrian Safety Improvements Educational and Enforcement Efforts Bicycle Safety Improvements Signal Timing Changes Traffic Calming Programs School Safety Program and School Crossing Guards Collision Data Review New Signals and Signal Upgrades Pedestrian Countdown Signals c. Collision data for incidents involving Muni vehicles are collected in the SFMTA s Transit Safe database and reviewed for potential system upgrades. d. The Loop section of the T Third line would be signalized and managed within the current the SFMTA safety framework. e. The SFMTA has an emergency response program to ensure that emergencies are addressed within reasonable timeframes. f. The SFMTA s trains and facilities are policed by the San Francisco Police Department (Agency, 2013)

7. How is the SFMTA addressing traffic signalization for pedestrian safety? The project includes the installation of traffic signals at 18 th and Illinois Streets and 19 th and Illinois Streets. Pedestrian activated walk/don t walk signals will also be included. Three new ladder/continental crosswalks will be installed at the intersection of 18 th and Illinois Streets, and ladder/continental crosswalks will be installed at the southern and western crossing of 19 th and Illinois Streets. Pedestrians will be prohibited from crossing the north side intersection of 19 th Street. 8. What is the SFMTA doing about traffic signalization in order to improve the T Third line? See response to Question #9. 9. When light rails exit MBL will the trains delay traffic on Third Street? The right turn from westbound 19 th Street to northbound 3 rd Street would be similar to the existing T Third right turn from eastbound Channel Street to southbound 3 rd Street. Traffic signal priority will be provided when LRVs make this right turn if the SFMTA determines this to be necessary. 10. How fast will LRVs travel through the MBL? In order to proceed through the Mission Bay Loop, multiple turns within a short distance is required. Therefore, the LRVs would travel at significantly slower speeds than the posted speed limit of 25 MPH (on 18 th, 19 th, and Illinois Streets) or 30 MPH (on 3 rd Street). LRVs are required to travel no more than 5 miles per hour while completing turns such as those necessary to travel through the Loop. Thus, the SFMTA anticipates that LRVs will travel at no more than 10-15 MPH while in the Loop, and at even slower speeds while turning. 11. What are the overall challenges that the SFMTA faces with light rails coming onto and out of the MBL? The Mission Bay Loop is an important terminal for the Third Street Corridor. The Loop will support the reliability of the overall system. The signal system is being designed to support the rail movements and the SFMTA does not anticipate major challenges coming into or out of the Loop. 12. How is the SFMTA addressing traffic impacts and conflicts with light rails on MBL? One lane of traffic will be available in each direction on Illinois, 18 th and 19 th Streets at all times.

13. How will the SFMTA coordinate light rail operations before and after Giants and Warriors games to prevent major traffic congestion? What is the proposed queuing or parking schedule for light rails on MBL during Giants and Warrior games? The T Third service carries thousands of passengers during Giants games, and will expect to carry similar volumes for Warriors games should the Warriors build a new arena in Mission Bay. This helps to reduce traffic congestion and encourages patrons to leave their cars at home. Giants games are supported by the SFMTA Parking Control Officers (PCOs) who help to direct traffic and minimize delays; Warriors games would be similarly supported. Some trains will likely stage on Mission Bay Loop during Giants games and other special events. Similarly, the trains would stage on the Loop during Warriors games should the Warriors build a new arena in Mission Bay. 14. If funding or staff resources were limited, which service (i.e. short line or long line) would be eliminated first? The SFMTA has a performance goal of delivering 98.5% of scheduled service. The SFMTA is currently in the process of hiring operators and rehabilitating vehicles to minimize service gaps. If a train breaks down or is not in service, actions will be taken to minimize gaps along the entire corridor between Sunnydale and Chinatown. 15. Why was Potrero Kids Daniel Webster Preschool (810 Illinois Street) left out of the EIR? The Environmental Assessment (EA) discussed the presence of a nearby school, La Scuola Internazionale di San Francisco, and discussed impacts from construction and operation of the Loop on the school, as well as impacts on adjacent and nearby residential units. The EA concluded that there would be no significant impacts on this school or nearby residential uses. The EA did not include the Potrero Kids Preschool, however impacts from construction and operation of the Loop on the Protero Kids Preschool would be similar to those on La Scuola and the adjacent and nearby residential units. Additionally, the project does not include the removal of parking on the block of Illinois Street south of 19 th Street, where 810 Illinois Street is located. Access to this block would be available at all times along eastbound 19 th Street and southbound Illinois Street approaching the intersection of 19 th and Illinois Streets. 16. Did staff review the cumulative effects of multiple construction projects happening around the timeline of construction for MBL? Consider impacts on pedestrian and bicycle traffic drawn to Crane Cove Park The SFMTA (like other City agencies) customarily coordinates its construction projects with any other nearby or adjacent public and private projects. The construction specifications

also require the contractor to be aware of, and coordinate with, other construction in the area. 17. Were stub tracks or a loop considered further south of 18 th and 19 th Streets? Why did the SFMTA reject alternatives south of MBL? The Mission Bay Loop was planned and approved as part of the T Third line, which was approved in 1999. During the planning process for the T Third line, alternative Loop locations were considered, but rejected due to one or more of the following reasons: 1) Loop operation by LRVs in the public right-of-way was not feasible (e.g. grade too steep, street was too narrow to accommodate an LRV and other modes.) 2) Conflicts due to existing parking and/or vehicular driveways, or the presence of loading docks, were found to be greater than those on the blocks bounded by 18 th, Illinois, and 19 th Streets. 3) A Loop at 23 rd Street or further south would add significant capital costs (more LRVs) and added operations costs (annual operations costs). Table 1: Explanation of Rejected Alternatives Loop Designation Street 1 Street 2 Street 3 Cost Impacts Design Issues 1 Mariposa Tennessee 18th No Conflict with I-280 on / off ramp access 2 Mariposa Illinois 18th Yes Conflict-Mariposa St. passenger platform - requires rebuild ($2-5M estimate) 3 18th Tennessee 19th No Excessive slope on 19th Street (9%+) for LRV operations 4 18th Illinois 19th No Project proposed location 5 19th Tennessee 20th No Excessive slope on 19th Street (9%+) for LRV operations 6 19th Illinois 20th Yes Conflict-20th Street passenger platform - requires rebuild ($2-5M estimate) 7 20th Tennessee 22nd No Extensive residential properties, longer Loop and high parking loss 8 20th Illinois 22nd No Extensive driveways and loading docks, longer Loop 9 22nd Tennessee 23rd Yes Dead end cul de sac pair on Tennessee St. - connection needed 10 22nd Illinois 23rd Maybe Longer Loop, extensive loading docks, may incur added operations costs 11 23rd Tennessee 24th Yes Added annual operations cost ($4M), and added vehicle costs ($20M) 12 23rd Illinois 24th Yes Added annual operations cost ($4M), and added vehicle costs ($20M)

Blocks below 23rd will incur added operations costs of $4M or more annually, and one-time capital costs for new vehicles of $20M. Table 2: Street Layout of Alternatives 18. Has the SFMTA considered how traffic at UCSF Mission Bay campus would affect MBL, especially the opening of UCSF Benioff Children s Hospital in February 2015? Access to the UCSF Mission Bay hospital will be from 4 th /16 th Street and from 4 th /Mariposa Streets. The hospital will increase traffic on these streets as well as on southbound 3 rd Street, north of 16 th Street and on northbound 3 rd Street, south of Mariposa Street. Traffic from the Mission Bay Campus or the UCSF Benioff Children s Hospital would not be anticipated to significantly affect operation of the MBL. 19. Illinois is currently a truck route for all the transportation, moving and constructions companies that are along piers south of AT&T Park. There is a steady stream of cement trucks, Bauer buses, moving trucks, food trucks, and tow trucks that travel up and down Illinois Street. They park at the various piers every night. So, with the south bound lane of Illinois Street being used for MBL, where will the truck traffic be rerouted? Also, if the southbound lane will not be closed to traffic, what percentage of time will the southbound street be available for auto, truck and bike traffic? The south bound lane of Illinois Street will be open to truck traffic. The southbound street will be available for auto, truck and bike traffic at all times. 20. How will the SFMTA prevent vehicle, pedestrian and bicycle collision issues along Illinois Street similar to Embarcadero Boulevard? The project includes best practices in roadway striping and marking, and in signage, for all modes of transportation, including bicycling. The project will remove the one-way stop control at the intersections of Illinois, 18 th, and 19 th Streets, and will install traffic signals at the intersections. Ladder and Continental crosswalks will also be installed and they have shown to effectively make drivers yield to

the right-of-way. The project also includes a pedestrian bulb-out on the east side of Illinois Street at 19 th Street, which will reduce the distance required to cross Illinois Street. The Embarcadero Roadway has long traffic signal cycle lengths (110 seconds) due to the volume of traffic, transit and width of the street. Some northbound bicyclists proceed on the red light while pedestrians are still crossing. Traffic signal cycle lengths on Illinois Street would be shorter than those on Embarcadero Boulevard. 21. How will MBL affect the Illinois Street Bike Plan? Currently, southbound bicycles on Illinois Street share a traffic lane with southbound vehicles. As part of the Mission Bay Loop, the SFMTA will add a sharrow to the southbound Illinois Street traffic lane. In the northbound direction, there will be sharrows just north of 19 th Street that will transition to a bike lane approximately 80 feet north of 19 th Street. The SFMTA will continue to work with the Port of San Francisco in the design and construction of the proposed Crane Cove Park in order to design the eastside sidewalk to allow for the inclusion of a full bike lane for the entire length of Illinois Street. 22. From what we are hearing, there will be one block of Illinois Street (where the Loop runs), which will convert from 1-way on either side into a 2-way on the northbound side. Southbound Illinois Street bicyclists will use a shared travel lane that will go on the inside of the Loop. 23. When I was looking at the boards in the public meeting, it looked like the northbound and southbound bike lanes were on the east side of the street. Is that correct? This block on Illinois Street between 18 th and 19 th Streets will contain one-way bike routes on either side.