Joint Strategic Needs Assessment for Torbay. Community Plan Turning the tide for Torbay. Supporting a Smoke-free Environment

Transcription

1 2008 Joint Strategic Needs Assessment for Torbay Community Plan Turning the tide for Torbay Supporting a Smoke-free Environment

2 Contents Foreword Page 1 Setting the Scene for Torbay Page 2 Background to the JSNA Page 3 Approach to the 2008 JSNA for Torbay Page 4 Executive Summary Page 5 Overview of Statistical Analysis Methodology for the JSNA Page 6 Demography Page 8 Population Overview by Age Group Current Population Estimates and Future Projections Life Expectancy Ethnicity / Marital Status / Religion Pride in the Bay Page 13 Public Perception Household Waste and Recycling Carbon Emissions Learning and Skills Page 15 Attainment Absenteeism Free School Meals NEETs Adult Qualification Levels The New Economy Page 19 Gross Value Added VAT Registered Businesses Earnings Hours Worked Notified Vacancies Benefit Claimants Indebtedness Fuel Poverty House Prices / Volume of Sales Stronger Communities Page 30 Housing Profile Affordable Homes Homelessness Hospital Admissions Maternity Teenage Conceptions Lifestyles Mortality Prevalence of Mental Health and Dementia ASB, Recorded Crime and Probation Younger People Page 39 Current and Projected Population Estimates Dependent Children Families on Benefits Children Looked After Young People Perception Youth Offending Older People Page 45 Current and Projected Population Estimates Housing Profile Benefits Healthy Life Expectancy Hospital Admissions Vulnerable People Page 48 Supported Living Through Social Services People Helped to Live at Home Supported People Services Provision of Unpaid Care Benefits Appendices i-bay Members Page 53 Maps Page 54 References and Useful Websites Page 60 Glossary / Acronyms Page Torbay Ward Structure Torquay 1 Wellswood 2 St Marychurch 3 Ellacombe 4 Tormohun 5 Watcombe 6 Shiphay with the Willows 7 Cockington with Chelston Paignton 8 Preston 9 Roundham with Hyde 10 Clifton with Maidenway 11 Blatchcombe 12 Goodrington with Roselands 13 Churston with Galmpton Brixham 14 Berry Head with Furzeham 15 St Mary s with Summercombe This map is based upon Ordnance Survey material with permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of the Controller of HMS Office Crown Copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown Copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Torbay Council. LA

3 Foreword Joint Strategic Needs Assessment 2008 From Nick Bye, Chair of Torbay Strategic Partnership I am delighted that, together with the Torbay Public Health team and i-bay, we have developed a report that provides a comprehensive picture of the differences in need across the population of Torbay. This second Joint Strategic Needs Assessment (JSNA) takes us to a new level in analysing and understanding the complex factors that will help us to improve the lives of local people and reduce current inequalities. This year the JSNA has been based on the Community Plan, drawn up by the Torbay Strategic Partnership (TSP), which outlines the Partnership s vision for Torbay over the next 20 years. The views of residents and representatives of the business, community and voluntary sectors all contributed to the Community Plan. The vision is directed by four key themes: Pride in the Bay, Stronger Communities, Learning and Skills for the Future and, underpinning it all, the New Economy, with economic prosperity at the heart of the plan leading towards community prosperity. There is a strong relationship between improved health and well-being and employment. Our combined focus is on boosting economic prosperity, consistent with a higher quality of life and better access to jobs, based on the promotion of our skills base and a can do entrepreneurial culture that is open to new ideas and seeks out all investment opportunities. The JSNA will provide a solid base from which we can tackle the challenges ahead and action a wide range of measures to improve our local community. It has never been more important that we meet these challenges together across the Torbay Strategic Partnership. The current recession is biting in Torbay and affecting local people. Our collective resolve and efforts must be based on a creative, cohesive and concerted response. But it must start with an excellent overview of people s needs and circumstances. This JSNA provides us with the right information at exactly the right time. The 2008 Joint Strategic Needs Assessment for Torbay sets out to: Highlight differences in need across Torbay. Provide a reference source for TSP members for future commissioning activities, for reporting and applications for funding. Aid better decision-making. Support the delivery of improved outcomes for the local community. Influence the choice of future Local Area Agreements (LAAs).

4 Setting the Scene for Torbay Torbay has a rich, diverse and proud heritage spanning many thousands of years. Torbay became a popular holiday destination early in the 19th century, famed for its romantic quality, its balmy air and perfect environment for relaxation and convalescence. It was the Victorians that coined the phrase the English Riviera, likening the area to its French equivalent. Subtropical plants and the celebrated Torbay Palm, flourishing within the special microclimate, add to the Mediterranean feel, and these days the busy waterfronts are a hive of activity catering for both working and pleasure craft. Winters are generally mild and short, giving way to the flower-filled warmth of an early spring. Summer really does seem to linger, with October and November very often mild enough to enjoy outdoor activities. The Geopark is an important component in all the strategic plans for the economic regeneration of Torbay, rich and well-exposed geological heritage, from Devonian reefs to Pleistocene bone-caves. This geology has strong links to the history of the science and culture, not least as Torbay includes sites crucial to the initial characterisation of the Devonian Period. The area includes one of the highest concentrations of protected geological sites in the UK with 11 nationally protected sites (SSSIs) and 15 regionally important sites (RIGS). Torbay has the romance of a seaside town, sandy beaches and above-average warm weather. With these attractions, Torbay, of course, has been a popular retirement destination for many years. The three Riviera towns of Brixham, Paignton and Torquay surround the natural, sheltered Bay which, with a southeasterly aspect, forms an ideal suntrap and boasts many Blue Flag beaches. In September 2007, Torbay became the 32nd member of the European Geoparks Network (EGN). Torbay had been working on its English Riviera Geopark application since It was able to demonstrate that it uses its geological heritage and its wider cultural heritage in its community and educational development framework. It also uses this heritage to promote and attract tourists to the area. Promoting the English Riviera on Torquay seafront 2

5 Background to the Joint Strategic Needs Assessment The Local Government and Public Involvement in Health Act (2007) requires Primary Care Trusts (PCTs) and Local Authorities to produce a Joint Strategic Needs Assessment (JSNA) of the health and well-being of their local community. The needs assessment is a systematic method for reviewing the health and well-being needs of a population, leading to agreed commissioning priorities that will improve the health and well-being outcomes and reduce inequalities. A JSNA is not a needs assessment of an individual, but a strategic overview of the local community need - either geographically such as local authority / ward or specific groups such as younger or older people or people from black and minority ethnic communities. The JSNA allows local partners to identify common priorities (for particular groups, services and wards) and to determine an evidence-based approach on how best to work together to meet those needs - whether through joint commissioning, joint provision or other approaches - and measure by achievement of joint targets (Local Area Agreements - LAAs). A JSNA will: Define achievable improvements in health and well-being outcomes for the local community. Send signals to existing and potential providers of services about potential service change. Support the delivery of better health and well-being outcomes for the local community. Inform the next stages of the commissioning cycle. Aid better decision-making. This JSNA then represents a single document that essentially guides the commissioning process to improve the health and well-being of the local population and to reduce the overall inequalities in the population currently found in Torbay. What benefits are there from last year s JSNA? Last year s JSNA highlighted the issues Torbay faces with regard to our higher-than-average elderly population and recognised the implications for service development. It also warned of the negative impacts for the future of current levels of risk-taking behaviours and explained the differences in outcomes experienced by our more deprived wards. It established the need to invest in health services to address the specific needs of our local population and additional funding was secured to do this. It also started the debate on inequalities within Torbay which led to the Closing the Gap project and the proposal to focus additional investment towards deprived areas. What we hope to achieve from this JSNA This JSNA should form a reference document for commissioners across all public service agencies, providing them with the evidence needed to agree and shape service delivery across Torbay. It should be possible to import sections of this report into funding applications and reports. Commissioners should use the JSNA to identify where Torbay overall is very different to the national average, which inequalities are of particular note and where they exist. Commissioners will then be better able to focus on those areas where the need to narrow the inequalities gap is greatest. Brixham harbour Oldway Mansion Underpin the LAA and the choice of local outcomes and targets, as well as local commissioning plans.

6 Approach to the 2008 JSNA for Torbay The 2007 JSNA was completed in partnership between Torbay Council and Torbay Care Trust, and was led by the Director of Public Health. Although this gave a picture of inequalities within Torbay, the process for undertaking the 2008 JSNA has become far more encompassing. The 2008 JSNA for Torbay has been commissioned by the Torbay Strategic Partnership for the Acting Director of Public Health to deliver. In delivering this second JSNA for Torbay, a cross-agency intelligence network called i-bay has been established (details of members and contributors to the 2008 JSNA can be viewed in Appendix 1). The intelligence network have taken the national guidance for a core dataset and increased the number of indicators to take account of the different agencies interest in the JSNA and the wider use of the document. This partnership working has ensured maximum public sector efficiency through reduced duplication, and future pieces of work are to be planned in a similar way during the coming year. In undertaking this piece of work, the aim was to use ward level data where possible and to achieve this, the intelligence network have shared aggregated anomalised data for the benefit of other members of the TSP. The ward level data, along with the Torbay, South West and England figures have then been analysed to highlight figures that are significantly different to the England figure. We have also sought to use the most recent date possible - especially as key data sources such as census data is increasingly out of date. The Torbay Strategic Partnership Community Plan has been followed for the format, representing a move away from the national guidance to have a JSNA in Torbay that better reflects the aspirations of the local community plan as well as identifying inequalities. In addition to the four community plan themes, this JSNA contains four further themes, Demography, Younger People, Older People and Vulnerable People, each one details a series of indicators relating to the theme. Torquay harbour

7 Executive Summary This Joint Strategic Needs Assessment has brought together members of the Torbay Strategic Partnership to identify the bigger picture in terms of the economic, social, health-care and well-being inequalities that exist within Torbay. This report allows the TSP to focus on not only the issues that affect Torbay overall, compared to the national average, but also the inequalities experienced by some wards compared to others. This JSNA summarises a vast amount of information, and is intended as a reference tool for all members of the Torbay Strategic Partnership to assist in the commissioning process, maximising the evidence base for funding bids and strategies. The tables that follow within this report have been specifically organised to reflect the Torbay Strategic Partnership Community Plan, and have been supported by four further tables. The tables are contained within the following sections: Section one - Demography Profiling the make-up of Torbay s population, and the expected growth in population in various age and social groups. The average age of residents in Torbay, at 43.7 years, is higher than the national average of 39.1 years; with two wards having an average age greater than 50 years. Section two - Pride in the Bay One of the cornerstones of the Community Plan aimed at creating and maintaining a quality environment, embracing culture and better transport. Household Waste constituted 64,596 tonnes (82%) of the Municipal Waste. 28% of household waste was recycled or composted and 72% was landfilled. On average, each household in Torbay produced 734kg of residual waste (i.e. waste that was not re-used, recycled or composted) during 2007/08. Section three - Learning and Skills for the Future A strategy for creating better skills and education through a culture of lifelong learning. The number of children aged 5 in Torbay that achieved 78 points across the Early Years Foundation Stage with at least 6 in each of the scales of personal, social and emotional development and communication, language and literacy is above the national average of 49.0%, with 638 (50.3%) children achieving the requirements. There was a noticeable variance between the wards, with Watcombe having 33.0% and Churston with Galmpton 68.9%. Section four - The New Economy Harnessing present economic strengths and building upon these, developing new opportunities and technologies. Torbay s economic worth was in the region of 1,622 million in 2006, or 12,178 per head of population. This measure of economic worth (GVA) is significantly lower for Torbay than the national average of 19,413 per head. Section five - Stronger Communities Creating healthier and safer communities with access to good quality housing, support, education and training. Alcohol-related admissions to hospital in 2006/07 were around 1,621 per 100,000 population in Torbay, significantly higher than the national 1,384 per 100,000. Section six - Younger People Improving the health and well-being of younger people, levels of education and opportunities. The rate of children looked after per 10,000 is significantly higher in Torbay, at 67 per 10,000, compared to the national 54 per 10,000. Section seven - Older People Improving the health and well-being, services and respect for older people. The proportion of Torbay s population aged 50 and over is currently 43.5%; this is projected to increase to 45.0% in 5 years time. The proportion of people aged 65 and over is projected to be just under a quarter (24.7%) of the total population in 5 years, compared to around 17% nationally. Section eight - Vulnerable People Safeguarding vulnerable people and developing the services provided. 5,000 adults in Torbay received community care services during 2007/08 for physical disability, frailty and sensory impairment, learning disability, mental health, substance misuse and vulnerable people services. This is a rate of 4,860 per 100,000 locally compared to 3,990 nationally. For each of the sections, there is a local ward level analysis, where possible, with colour-coded significance from the national average. Undertaking the analysis in this way will allow services to be targeted to the areas with the greatest need.

8 Overview of Statistical Analysis Methodology for the JSNA The analysis contained in each of the data sets has been undertaken to show where a value differs significantly from the England average, or in a couple of instances, where the ward level differs significantly from the Torbay average. Where a significant value has been identified, a colour has then been attributed to the data. The colours used are red and green; where red indicates that a value is higher or worse than the national average and where we feel that the result could indicate a potential need or gap. Green indicates that the value is lower or better that the national average. No colouring indicates that there is no associated significance, or that the significance could not be identified. Significantly different Significantly different Not Significantly different Higher or worse than the national figure Lower or better than the national figure No significance or unable to identify any significance There are some exceptions to the basic principle that red shading represents a significantly higher figure compared to the national average. Determining significance In simplistic terms, a confidence interval is a measure by which an estimated value may lie. Therefore confidence intervals have both upper and lower limits. These limits are then used to measure the precision (narrower limits) or imprecision (wider limits). An estimate with wider limits (a large confidence interval) has a greater uncertainty in it. Comparisons are often made between two or more different estimates (see below chart). Sometimes in such cases statistical testing is undertaken by comparing the confidence intervals of the estimates to see if they overlap - with non-overlapping confidence intervals being considered as statistically significantly different. This is quick and easy to do, but not necessarily conclusive. Whilst it is safe to assume that non-overlapping confidence intervals indicate a statistically significant difference, it is not always the case that overlapping confidence intervals do not. Significantly different Significantly different Not significantly different There are some indicators where a significantly lower figure can be easily judged to suggest a potential gap in services or a worse position. For the indicators where this judgement has been made, the colour coding has been reversed and marked with a diamond. For the majority of indicators, the judgement on whether a higher or lower figure is better or worse cannot be easily made and the principle of red shading representing a significantly higher result has been maintained. An example of where indicators are red: Areas that have a significantly higher proportion of older people have been highlighted red as we would expect increased adult social care service provision in the coming years. Areas with a significantly lower educational attainment have been highlighted red as we would want to increase attainment. It should not be assumed that a red colour means that the particular indicator needs priority attention; all indicators need to be considered together against existing priorities. Target line? Correct Correct Not necessarily All colour-shaded indicators have been calculated to determine appropriate levels of confidence using Professor R.G.Newcombe. Stats in Medicine 1998, 17, Method 10, and calculate the confidence interval between two proportions based on unpaired data.

9 Torbay Ward Structure Watcombe St Marychurch Shiphay with the Willows Combe Pafford Ellacombe Cockington with Chelston Clifton with Maidenway Preston Tormohun Wellswood Roundham with Hyde Blatchcombe Churston with Galmpton Goodrington with Roselands Berry Head with Furzeham St Mary s with Summercombe This map is based upon Ordnance Survey material with permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of the Controller of HMS Office Crown Copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown Copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Torbay Council. LA

10 Demography This first section of data looks at the demography of Torbay and gives an overview of the resident population, including the current population estimates per ward and selected age groups, as well as the projected population in five years time. The latest population estimate for Torbay is the 2007 Mid Year Estimate from the Office of National Statistics. The population pyramid illustrates graphically the population structure of Torbay compared to the England average. Our key findings The average age of residents in Torbay, at 43.7 years, is higher than the national average of 39.1; with two wards having an average age greater than 50 years. A higher average age is reflected in the older person bias within the Bay, where levels of persons aged over 50 account for around 43% of the total population, this is projected to increase over the next 5 years to 45%. With an ageing population, where female residents have a higher life expectancy, it comes as no surprise that the proportion of widows in the Bay is significantly higher than the national average. Despite the palm tree image of Torbay, there are areas of severe deprivation, with two of Torbay s electoral wards being ranked in the top 10% most deprived in England. Areas of deprivation can be viewed in the thematic maps in Appendix Mid-Year Estimate Population Pyramid For Torbay Compared to England Whilst we have identified indicators relating to the demography section, we fully acknowledge that there are limitations and gaps due to the data that is available. Male 80 to 84 Female Some examples of the limitations and future developments for the Demography data set 70 to 74 Data from the 2001 census will not be updated until the 2011 census. 60 to to 54 Further work with Strategic Planners is needed to improve local population projections - guided by proposed development sites. 40 to 44 Development of all-age all-cause mortality at ward level. 30 to to 24 Predictive modelling to investigate interventions and outcomes around reducing inequalities and increasing life expectancy. 10 to 14 0 to 4 4% 3% 2% 1% 0% 1% 2% 3% 4% Proportion of total population England 8

11 Demography Table 1 of 3 1. Resident population 2. Average age 3. Population growth to Projected population Projected population 6. Projected growth to Resident population aged 0 to Projected population aged 0 to 19 in Resident population aged 16 and over 10. Projected population aged 16 and over in Working age population 12. Projected working age population in Resident population aged 50 and over 14. Projected population aged 50 and over in 2013 Date Measure Count Years % % % % % % % % % u % u % % England 50,762, % 51,487,500 53,514, % 24.3% 23.3% 80.9% 81.3% 62.3% 61.2% 33.7% 35.2% South West 5,124, % 5,217,400 5,468, % 23.2% 22.0% 82.0% 82.7% 60.8% 58.8% 38.1% 39.7% Torbay 133, % 135, , % 22.1% 21.1% 82.9% 83.3% 56.8% 55.2% 43.3% 45.0% Berry Head with Furzeham 10, % N/A N/A N/A 18.4% N/A 86.8% N/A 54.7% N/A 51.9% N/A Blatchcombe 11, % N/A N/A N/A 28.2% N/A 77.5% N/A 58.8% N/A 33.6% N/A Churston with Galmpton 6, % N/A N/A N/A 16.7% N/A 87.8% N/A 48.7% N/A 59.2% N/A Clifton with Maidenway 7, % N/A N/A N/A 23.1% N/A 82.0% N/A 57.1% N/A 42.7% N/A Cockington with Chelston 11, % N/A N/A N/A 24.2% N/A 81.1% N/A 57.9% N/A 40.3% N/A Ellacombe 7, % N/A N/A N/A 26.2% N/A 79.8% N/A 63.2% N/A 31.9% N/A Goodrington with Roselands 7, % N/A N/A N/A 22.6% N/A 82.8% N/A 55.9% N/A 44.3% N/A Preston 10, % N/A N/A N/A 19.7% N/A 84.5% N/A 53.1% N/A 49.3% N/A Roundham with Hyde 7, % N/A N/A N/A 18.4% N/A 85.7% N/A 55.4% N/A 47.4% N/A St Marychurch 11, % N/A N/A N/A 21.4% N/A 83.4% N/A 54.3% N/A 45.7% N/A St Mary s with Summercombe 7, % N/A N/A N/A 23.2% N/A 82.3% N/A 53.8% N/A 45.0% N/A Shiphay with the Willows 9, % N/A N/A N/A 26.0% N/A 78.7% N/A 60.3% N/A 33.5% N/A Tormohun 11, % N/A N/A N/A 22.0% N/A 83.7% N/A 65.1% N/A 35.5% N/A Watcombe 7, % N/A N/A N/A 26.9% N/A 78.9% N/A 55.6% N/A 39.1% N/A Wellswood 7, % N/A N/A N/A 12.1% N/A 90.7% N/A 54.1% N/A 57.2% N/A Demography notes: u indicates where a judgement on the colouring has been made 1. Resident population Mid Year Estimate, ONS 2. Approximate average age of the resident population, based on 2006 Mid Year Estimate, ONS & Torbay Care Trust 3. Population growth over last 5 years Census and 2006 Mid Year Estimate, ONS Projected population, 2006 based, 2008 Subnational Population Projections, ONS Projected Population, 2006 based, 2008 Subnational Population Projections, ONS 6. Estimated population growth 2008 to 2013, 2006 based, 2008 Subnational Population Projections, ONS 7. Resident population aged 0 to Mid Year Estimate, ONS 8. Projected population aged 0 to 19 in based, 2008 Subnational Population Projections, ONS 9. Resident population aged 16 and over Mid Year Estimate, ONS 10. Projected population aged 16 and over in based, 2008 Subnational Population Projections, ONS 11. Working age population (Males aged 16 to 64 and Females aged 16 to 59) Mid Year Estimate, ONS 12. Projected working age population in based, 2008 Subnational Population Projections, ONS 13. Resident population aged 50 and over Mid Year Estimate, ONS 14. Projected population aged 50 and over in based, 2008 Subnational Population Projections, ONS

12 Demography Table 2 of Retirement age population 16. Projected retirement age population in Resident population aged 65 and over 18. Projected population aged 65 and over in Resident population aged 75 and over 20. Projected population aged 75 and over in Resident population aged 85 and over 22. Projected population aged 85 and over in Ethnicity - white British population 24. Religion - Christian 25. Religion - no religion 26. Limiting long-term illness 27. Birth rate 28. Proportion of low weight births Date Measure % % % % % % % % % u % % % 1,000 Females 15 to 44 % England 18.6% 20.2% 15.9% 17.4% 7.7% 8.1% 2.1% 2.4% 87.0% 71.7% 14.6% 17.9% % South West 21.8% 23.9% 18.7% 20.8% 9.4% 9.8% 2.7% 3.1% 95.4% 74.0% 16.7% 18.1% % Torbay 26.1% 28.2% 22.6% 24.7% 11.8% 12.0% 3.8% 4.0% 96.8% 76.2% 14.9% 23.0% % Berry Head with Furzeham 32.1% N/A 27.7% N/A 13.5% N/A 4.1% N/A 97.3% 77.4% 13.7% 25.0% % Blatchcombe 18.6% N/A 15.8% N/A 6.6% N/A 1.6% N/A 97.4% 74.3% 16.4% 20.6% % Churston with Galmpton 39.1% N/A 34.3% N/A 18.7% N/A 5.8% N/A 97.6% 81.4% 10.2% 25.0% % Clifton with Maidenway 24.9% N/A 21.6% N/A 10.7% N/A 3.2% N/A 97.4% 75.6% 15.4% 21.2% % Cockington with Chelston 23.1% N/A 19.8% N/A 10.0% N/A 3.1% N/A 96.2% 77.7% 14.3% 19.3% % Ellacombe 16.6% N/A 14.3% N/A 7.0% N/A 2.3% N/A 96.7% 73.5% 17.9% 20.1% % Goodrington with Roselands 26.8% N/A 22.5% N/A 11.0% N/A 3.6% N/A 97.9% 78.8% 12.9% 21.6% % Preston 31.5% N/A 27.7% N/A 15.6% N/A 5.3% N/A 97.2% 79.2% 12.8% 23.8% % Roundham with Hyde 30.2% N/A 26.6% N/A 15.4% N/A 6.0% N/A 96.9% 71.9% 18.0% 30.3% % St Marychurch 29.0% N/A 25.7% N/A 15.6% N/A 5.7% N/A 98.2% 77.5% 13.6% 24.9% % St Mary s with Summercombe 28.4% N/A 24.6% N/A 11.9% N/A 3.4% N/A 96.1% 76.3% 15.1% 23.8% % Shiphay with the Willows 18.3% N/A 15.5% N/A 7.7% N/A 2.0% N/A 97.0% 77.5% 15.1% 17.3% % Tormohun 18.6% N/A 15.9% N/A 8.1% N/A 2.6% N/A 95.1% 71.0% 18.3% 23.2% % Watcombe 23.3% N/A 19.8% N/A 8.2% N/A 2.2% N/A 97.9% 75.1% 15.5% 22.0% % Wellswood 36.6% N/A 32.9% N/A 19.0% N/A 6.5% N/A 95.1% 75.6% 14.4% 28.6% % 10 Demography notes: u indicates where a judgement on the colouring has been made 15. Retirement age population, (Males aged 64+ and Females aged 59+) Mid Year Estimate, ONS 16. Projected retirement age population in 2013 (Males aged 64+ and Females aged 59+) based, 2008 Subnational Population Projections, ONS 17. Resident population aged 65 and over Mid Year Estimate, ONS 18. Projected population aged 65 and over in based, 2008 Subnational Population Projections, ONS 19. Resident population aged 75 and over Mid Year Estimate, ONS 20. Projected population aged 75 and over in based, 2008 Subnational Population Projections, ONS 21. Resident population aged 85 and over Mid Year Estimate, ONS 22. Projected population aged 85 and over in based, 2008 Subnational Population Projections, ONS 23. Ethnicity - Proportion of total population White British, 2001 Census, ONS 24. Religion - Proportion of total population stating their religion as Christian, 2001 Census, ONS 25. Religion - No Religion; Proportion of total population stating their religion as no religion, 2001 Census, ONS 26. Limiting Long Term Illness - Proportion of the total resident population with a limiting long term illness, ONS 2001 census 27. Birth rate - number of live births per 1,000 female population aged 15 to 44, 2006 Mid Year Estimate, ONS and Torbay Care Trust 28. Proportion of low weight births - Proportion of total births in 2006 where the birth weight is less than 2.5 kg, ONS & Torbay Care Trust

13 Demography Table 3 of Mean age of mother 30. Life expectancy - males 31. Life expectancy - females 32. Marital status - single 33. Marital status - married 34. Same sex couples 35. Marital status - divorced 36. Marital status - widowed 37. AB: Higher and intermediate managerial / administrative / professional 38. C1: Supervisory, clerical, junior managerial / administrative / professional 39. C2: Skilled manual workers 40. D: Semi-skilled and unskilled manual workers 41. E: On state benefit, unemployed, lowest grade workers 42. Rank of Index of Multiple Deprivation Date / / Measure Years Years Years % % Per 100,000 aged 16+ % % % % % % % Rank England % 53.3% % 8.3% 22.2% 29.7% 15.1% 17.0% 16.0% N/A South West N/A % 55.5% % 8.9% 21.2% 31.4% 16.2% 16.0% 15.2% N/A Torbay % 52.8% % 11.2% 15.7% 33.0% 15.8% 18.5% 17.1% N/A Berry Head with Furzeham % 55.8% N/A 11.3% 11.6% 14.3% 33.0% 15.6% 17.6% 19.4% 20+% to 30% Blatchcombe % 54.1% N/A 12.1% 8.4% 14.4% 27.7% 17.9% 23.5% 16.5% 10+% to 20% Churston with Galmpton % 64.3% N/A 6.2% 13.2% 22.0% 35.9% 10.2% 11.8% 20.1% 60+% to 70% Clifton with Maidenway % 55.6% N/A 10.6% 9.8% 13.5% 33.5% 18.1% 20.2% 14.8% 20+% to 30% Cockington with Chelston % 56.2% N/A 9.7% 9.3% 18.0% 33.2% 16.6% 17.3% 14.9% 30+% to 40% Ellacombe % 44.9% N/A 12.7% 7.7% 12.6% 31.8% 19.2% 22.2% 14.2% 10+% to 20% Goodrington with Roselands % 57.5% N/A 9.8% 11.9% 16.3% 32.5% 16.0% 17.8% 17.5% 30+% to 40% Preston % 57.1% N/A 9.2% 12.4% 18.5% 36.3% 13.4% 14.1% 17.7% 30+% to 40% Roundham with Hyde % 43.8% N/A 12.6% 17.6% 11.1% 33.2% 15.1% 21.4% 19.1% Top 10% St Marychurch % 49.1% N/A 11.2% 14.1% 15.9% 33.9% 14.5% 19.1% 16.6% 20+% to 30% St Mary s with Summercombe % 56.1% N/A 9.7% 11.3% 13.5% 32.2% 17.4% 18.5% 18.4% 20+% to 30% Shiphay with the Willows % 57.3% N/A 9.6% 7.7% 19.1% 34.4% 16.7% 15.5% 14.3% 40+% to 50% Tormohun % 41.1% N/A 13.7% 9.4% 12.6% 31.3% 17.2% 23.0% 15.9% Top 10% Watcombe % 54.6% N/A 10.3% 10.1% 9.6% 28.9% 18.1% 23.2% 20.2% 10+% to 20% Wellswood % 48.4% N/A 11.2% 13.5% 22.4% 36.6% 10.7% 12.5% 17.8% 10+% to 20% Demography notes: 29. Mean age of mother at birth , ONS & Torbay Care Trust 30. Life Expectancy (Males) - Male life expectancy at birth in years for 2004 to 2006, ONS & Torbay Care Trust 31. Life Expectancy (Females) - Female life expectancy at birth in years for 2004 to 2006, ONS & Torbay Care Trust 32. Marital Status - Single never married, 2001 Census, ONS 33. Marital Status - Married, Re-married and Separated (but still legally married), 2001 Census, ONS 34. Same Sex Couples - number of people aged 16 plus living in a same-sex couple per 100,000 resident population (aged 16 and over), 2001 Census, ONS 35. Marital Status - Divorced, 2001 Census, ONS 36. Marital Status - Widowed, 2001 Census, ONS 37. Approximated Social Grade; AB: Higher and intermediate managerial / administrative / professional, All People Aged 16 and over in Households, 2001 Census, ONS 38. Approximated Social Grade; C1: Supervisory, clerical, junior managerial / administrative / professional, All People Aged 16 and over in Households, 2001 Census, ONS 39. Approximated Social Grade; C2: Skilled manual workers, All People Aged 16 and over in Households, 2001 Census, ONS 40. Approximated Social Grade; D: Semi-skilled and unskilled manual workers, All People Aged 16 and over in Households, 2001 Census, ONS 41. Approximated Social Grade; E: On state benefit, unemployed, lowest grade workers, All People Aged 16 and over in Households, 2001 Census, ONS 42. Rank of Index of Multiple Deprivation - Ranking of average SOA score per ward for the Index of Multiple Deprivation

14 Community Plan Turning the tide for Torbay Torbay Strategic Partnership Community Plan Themes The Community Plan outlines the vision for Torbay over the next 20 years bringing together the views of residents as well as representatives from the business, community and voluntary sectors. Vision and ambition for the Bay A prosperous area known to be a great place in which to live and learn and grow up. An area where we compete on a world stage in our traditional industries of tourism and fishing. An area where communities know and support each other and enjoy some of the best services in England. An area that widens opportunities and provides high-quality employment and retains our young people in the Bay. An area that celebrates the differences in the three towns, builds on the strengths of these towns and brings back the feel-good factor. Under each of the Community Plan themes are a series of indicators that try to reflect the ambitions and priorities of the theme. With the national indicator frame set being published in April 2008, and still within their first year of reporting, there are several gaps within the data set where figures are reported annually. Therefore not all of the Local Area Agreement indicators have been included. Community prosperity Pride in the Bay Economic prosperity Learning and skills for the future Four key themes - Pride in the Bay, Learning and Skills for the Future, The New Economy and Stronger Communities - have been identified as making the biggest difference to the TSP ambitions. Stronger communities The new economy Community prosperity 12

15 Pride in the Bay Pride in the Bay is one of the cornerstones of the Community Plan - aimed at creating and maintaining a quality environment, improving the quality and quantity of culture in the Bay and making it easier to get around through better transport choices. This links to other areas of the Wheel through regeneration and employment opportunities and the development of communities that care for each other and their environment. Our key findings Carbon Dioxide (CO2) emissions per head of population at 5.2 tonnes are significantly lower than the national average of 8.6 tonnes. Findings from the 2006 general user satisfaction survey show that, on the whole, residents are less satisfied with their local area as a place to live. Public perception was significantly higher for resident believing that rubbish and litter lying around was a very big or a fairly big problem. Household Waste constituted 64,596 tonnes (82%) of the Municipal Waste. 28% of household waste was recycled or composted and 72% was landfilled. On average, each household in Torbay produced 734kg of residual waste (i.e. waste that was not re-used, recycled or composted) during 2007/08. Whilst we have identified indicators relating to the Pride in the Bay section, we fully acknowledge that there are limitations and gaps due to the data that is available. Some examples of the limitations and future developments for the Pride in the Bay data set Data from the 2001 census will not be updated until the 2011 census. Results of the national place survey are due for publication in the spring of 2009; this would allow increased and up-to-date inclusion of resident perception data and increase the resident voice within the JSNA. Local level data on recycling rates, air quality, carbon emissions, cultural mix of businesses in the Bay, accessibility to public transport would all complement the JSNA. Babbacombe beach Brixham harbour - Golden Hind 13

16 Pride in the Bay Table 1 of 1 1. Overall satisfaction with local area as place to live (perception) 2. Parents not being made to take responsibility for the behaviour of their children (perception) 3. People not treating other people with respect and consideration (perception) 4. Rubbish and litter lying around (perception) 5. Residual waste per household 6. Municipal waste - household waste 7. Management of municipal waste - landfill 8. Management of municipal waste - recycled / composted 9. Use of public libraries 10. Visits to museums and galleries 11. Engagement in the arts 12. Domestic emissions 13. Per capita emissions 14. Area of domestic buildings 15. Area of road 16. Area of domestic gardens 17. Area of green space Date / / / / Measure % u % % % kg % % % u % u % u % u % Tonnes per head % % % % England 75.1% 61.7% 47.7% 42.2% % 54.4% 34.0% 48.5% 53.8% 45.2% 28.9% % 2.2% 4.3% 87.5% South West Region N/A N/A N/A N/A % 58.7% 41.0% 47.8% 52.9% 47.6% 30.7% % 1.8% 3.1% 90.7% Torbay 70.0% 73.0% 59.0% 56.6% % 71.2% 28.7% 45.0% 37.3% 40.1% 45.0% % 8.1% 21.9% 54.5% Berry Head with Furzeham 82.9% 66.1% 46.4% 50.4% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 11.1% 9.6% 29.9% 38.6% Blatchcombe 66.9% 73.7% 54.2% 60.8% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 2.8% 4.5% 9.5% 77.3% Churston with Galmpton 86.4% 64.2% 48.7% 52.3% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 3.1% 4.3% 14.0% 74.4% Clifton with Maidenway 74.6% 75.8% 60.3% 61.8% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 14.8% 13.7% 50.5% 16.5% Cockington with Chelston 76.9% 61.9% 49.1% 47.0% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 4.6% 7.0% 19.8% 62.6% Ellacombe 55.4% 68.1% 68.1% 65.2% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 19.9% 18.6% 37.5% 14.2% Goodrington with Roselands 71.6% 74.7% 51.4% 56.8% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 6.9% 8.5% 22.4% 45.4% Preston 80.5% 69.8% 60.3% 56.2% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 10.6% 11.3% 36.9% 30.1% Roundham with Hyde 63.0% 75.3% 57.5% 74.1% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 12.0% 16.0% 26.8% 18.6% St Marychurch 68.2% 75.2% 60.3% 60.2% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 5.6% 7.3% 19.8% 60.1% St Mary s with Summercombe 83.2% 67.0% 51.6% 57.1% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 8.5% 8.4% 28.6% 48.0% Shiphay with the Willows 70.2% 71.6% 61.2% 59.4% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 6.0% 9.6% 22.0% 51.6% Tormohun 58.0% 74.8% 70.5% 72.1% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 9.5% 15.2% 22.4% 25.4% Watcombe 67.4% 76.7% 62.2% 54.8% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 10.7% 11.9% 38.6% 33.9% Wellswood 80.8% 63.9% 55.3% 61.2% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 6.9% 9.1% 33.3% 37.0% 14 Pride in the Bay notes: u indicates where a judgement on the colouring has been made indicates where data has been modelled from MLSOA to electoral ward 1. Overall satisfaction with local area as place to live (perception) General User Satisfaction Survey, perception of people satisfied with their local area as a place to live Audit Commission and Torbay Council (un-weighted ward level analysis against the England mean). 2. Parents not being made to take responsibility for the behaviour of their children (perception) General User Satisfaction Survey, perception of people when thinking about their local area, believe that parents not being made to take responsibility for the behaviour of their children is a very big or a fairly big problem Audit Commission and Torbay Council (un-weighted ward level analysis against the England mean). 3. People not treating other people with respect and consideration (perception) General User Satisfaction Survey, perception of people when thinking about their local area, believe that people not treating other people with respect and consideration is a very big or a fairly big problem Audit Commission and Torbay Council (un-weighted ward level analysis against the England mean). 4. Rubbish and litter lying around (perception) General User Satisfaction Survey, perception of people when thinking about their local area, believe that rubbish and litter lying around is a very big or a fairly big problem Audit Commission and Torbay Council (un-weighted ward level analysis against the England mean). 5. Residual waste per household - Municipal Waste Statistics, DEFRA e-digest environmental statistics website: environment/statistics/ Crown copyright material is reproduced with the permission of the Controller of HMSO. 6. Municipal waste - Household waste - Municipal Waste Statistics, DEFRA e-digest environmental statistics website: environment/statistics/ Crown copyright material is reproduced with the permission of the Controller of HMSO. 7. Management of municipal waste - % going to Land fill - Municipal Waste Statistics, DEFRA e-digest environmental statistics website: Crown copyright material is reproduced with the permission of the Controller of HMSO. 8. Management of municipal waste - % recycled / composted - Municipal Waste Statistics, DEFRA e-digest environmental statistics website: Crown copyright material is reproduced with the permission of the Controller of HMSO. 9. Use of public libraries - NI 9 The percentage of the adult population in a local area who say they have used a public library service at least once in the last 12 months. Active People Survey 10. Visits to museums and galleries - NI 10 The percentage of the adult population in a local area who say they have attended a museum or gallery at least once in the last 12 months. Active People Survey 11. Engagement in the Arts - NI 11 The percentage of the adult population in a local area that have engaged in the arts at least three times in the past 12 months. Active People Survey 12. Domestic Emissions - Carbon Dioxide (CO2) as a proportion of all CO2 emissions (tonnes), 2006, DEFRA 13. Per capita emissions - Carbon Dioxide (CO2) emissions per capita (per head) emissions (tonnes) 2006, DEFRA 14. Area of Domestic Buildings - As a proportion of all land use, 2005 National Land Use Database, ONS 15. Area of Road - As a proportion of all land use, 2005 National Land Use Database, ONS 16. Area of Domestic Gardens - As a proportion of all land use, 2005 National Land Use Database, ONS 17. Area of Green space - As a proportion of all land use, 2005 National Land Use Database, ONS

17 Learning and Skills for the Future We are aiming for better education, better skills and better prospects through promoting a culture of lifelong learning. This means: Encouraging achievement, raising aspirations and promoting better links between education and training and businesses. Narrowing the gap between the most and least advantaged children. Supporting a range of lifelong learning opportunities for adults and older people. This links to other parts of the Wheel through the encouragement of innovation and entrepreneurship and addressing issues of inequality through stronger communities. Priorities focused on children and young people will be delivered through the Torbay Children and Young People s Plan. Our key findings The number of children aged 5 in Torbay that achieved 78 points across the Early Years Foundation Stage with at least 6 in each of the scales of personal, social and emotional development and communication, language and literacy is above the national average of 49.0%, with 638 (50.3%) children achieving the requirements. There was a noticeable variance between the wards, with Watcombe having 33.0% and Churston with Galmpton 68.9%. Overall GCSE attainment levels in Torbay for 2006/07 were lower than the national average. There were noticeable variations between the wards; with both Churston with Galmpton and Wellswood having a significantly higher proportion of pupils achieving 5+ A* to C grades. Persistent absenteeism in the Bay (percentage of all enrolments) is higher than both national and regional rates; with 10 wards having significantly higher rates than the national average. There is a slightly higher rate of persistent absenteeism in female compared to males within the Bay. The proportion of pupils accessing free school meals in Torbay is lower than the national level; however there are 5 wards where the level is significantly higher than the national. The proportion of 16 to 18-year-olds in Torbay who are not in education, employment or training (NEETs) is significantly lower compared to the national. Whilst we have identified indicators relating to the learning and skills for the future section, we fully acknowledge that there are limitations and gaps due to the data that is available. Some examples of the limitations and future developments for the Learning and Skills for the Future data set Data from the 2001 census will not be updated until the 2011 census. Improved estimates of the working age population and their overall qualification levels. Information on apprenticeships and trainees. Vocational training and learning. 15

18 Learning & Skills for the Future Table 1 of 3 1. Achievement of at least 78 points across the Foundation Stage profile 2. Narrowing the gap between the lowest achieving 20% in the early years Foundation Stage profile and the rest 3. Key Stage 1 - pupils achieving level 2+ in reading 4. Key Stage 1 - pupils achieving level 2+ in writing 5. Key Stage 2 - pupils achieving level 4+ in english 6. Key Stage 3 - pupils achieving level 5+ in english 7. Key Stage 3 - pupils achieving level 5+ in mathematics 8. Key Stage 3 - pupils achieving level 5+ in science 9. All pupils at the end of Key Stage 4 achieving 5+ A* - C 10. Percentage of pupils progressing by 2 levels in English between Key Stage 1 and Key Stage Percentage of pupils progressing by 2 levels in Maths between Key Stage 1 and Key Stage Percentage of pupils progressing by 2 levels in English between Key Stage 2 and Key Stage Percentage of pupils progressing by 2 levels in Maths between Key Stage 2 and Key Stage Percentage of pupils making 2 levels of progress in English between Key Stage 3 and Key Stage 4 Date / Measure % % % % % % % % % % % % % % England 49.0% 35.6% 84.0% 80.0% 80.0% 74.0% 76.0% 73.0% 60.4% 83.6% 75.9% 27.4% 58.6% 55.5% South West 52.0% 33.4% 85.0% 81.0% 81.0% 76.0% 77.0% 76.0% 59.5% 84.2% 75.7% 28.2% 60.6% 57.6% Torbay 50.3% 31.1% 82.0% 80.0% 78.0% 77.0% 75.0% 74.0% 56.0% 79.3% 73.5% 41.7% 62.7% 61.3% Berry Head-with-Furzeham 54.3% 29.6% 88.0% 86.0% 82.8% 82.0% 86.0% 85.0% 56.4% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Blatchcombe 54.5% 30.3% 80.0% 77.0% 75.9% 79.0% 69.0% 69.0% 48.0% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Churston-with-Galmpton 68.9% 18.1% 78.0% 70.0% 82.7% 88.0% 84.0% 87.0% 74.0% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Clifton-with-Maidenway 55.4% 30.3% 84.0% 83.0% 78.9% 86.0% 81.0% 78.0% 48.3% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Cockington-with-Chelston 44.8% 32.6% 90.0% 85.9% 83.2% 72.4% 72.4% 72.7% 58.2% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Ellacombe 50.7% 25.5% 78.4% 82.6% 80.2% 75.0% 67.6% 69.0% 57.0% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Goodrington-with-Roselands 58.1% 26.6% 74.0% 72.0% 74.4% 83.0% 86.0% 84.0% 68.8% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Preston 56.2% 26.7% 88.0% 85.1% 85.7% 81.0% 83.7% 81.6% 63.8% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Roundham-with-Hyde 45.6% 26.6% 75.5% 72.5% 78.5% 81.0% 74.0% 71.0% 54.4% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A St Marychurch 57.6% 25.5% 78.1% 77.7% 78.6% 77.0% 75.9% 72.8% 54.9% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A St Mary s-with-summercombe 39.5% 43.8% 91.0% 83.0% 72.5% 77.0% 80.0% 79.0% 47.1% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Shiphay-with-the-Willows 46.4% 28.4% 88.0% 89.0% 84.2% 72.0% 73.0% 71.0% 58.0% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Tormohun 50.5% 34.6% 79.9% 81.7% 70.2% 64.1% 67.2% 67.7% 51.9% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Watcombe 33.0% 37.8% 70.0% 75.0% 67.0% 73.0% 71.0% 67.0% 38.9% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Wellswood 58.3% 25.2% 83.0% 70.0% 82.4% 69.0% 67.0% 69.0% 83.3% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 16 Learning & Skills for the Future notes: indicates where data has been modelled from MLSOA to electoral ward 1. Achievement of at least 78 points across the Foundation stage profile (NI 72) - Achievement of at least 78 points across the Foundation stage profile with at least 6 in each of the scales in Personal, Social and Emotional Development and Communication, Language and Literacy: 2008, Torbay Council, DCSF 2. Narrowing the gap between the lowest achieving 20% in the Early Years Foundation Stage Profile and the rest (NI 92), 2008, Torbay Council, DCSF 3. Key Stage 1 - Pupils Achieving Level 2+ in Reading, National Curriculum Assessments at Key Stage 1 by Gender in England (Referenced by Location of Pupil Residence), 2007, ONS 4. Key Stage 1 - Pupils Achieving Level 2+ in Writing, National Curriculum Assessments at Key Stage 1 by Gender in England (Referenced by Location of Pupil Residence), 2007, ONS 5. Key Stage 2 - Pupils Achieving Level 4+ in English, National Curriculum Assessments at Key Stage 2 by Gender in England (Referenced by Location of Pupil Residence), 2007, ONS 6. Key Stage 3 - Pupils Achieving Level 5+ in English, National Curriculum Assessments at Key Stage 3 by Gender in England (Referenced by Location of Pupil Residence), 2007, ONS 7. Key Stage 3 - Pupils Achieving Level 5+ in Mathematics, National Curriculum Assessments at Key Stage 3 by Gender in England (Referenced by Location of Pupil Residence), 2007, ONS 8. Key Stage 3 - Pupils Achieving Level 5+ in Science, National Curriculum Assessments at Key Stage 3 by Gender in England (Referenced by Location of Pupil Residence), 2007, ONS 9. All Pupils at the End of KS4 Achieving 5+ A* - C, GCSE and Equivalent Results for Young People by Gender in England (Referenced by Location of Pupil Residence), 2006/2007, ONS 10. NI 93: Percentage of pupils progressing by 2 levels in English between Key Stage 1 and Key Stage 2, 2007 DCSF 11. NI 94: Percentage of pupils progressing by 2 levels in Maths between Key Stage 1 and Key Stage 2, 2007 DCSF 12. NI 95: Percentage of pupils progressing by 2 levels in English between Key Stage 2 and Key Stage 3, 2007 DCSF 13. NI 96: Percentage of pupils progressing by 2 levels in Maths between Key Stage 2 and Key Stage 3, 2007 DCSF 14. NI 97: Percentage of pupils making 2 levels of progress in English between Key Stage 3 and Key Stage 4, 2007 DCSF

19 Learning & Skills for the Future Table 2 of Percentage of pupils progressing by 2 levels in Maths between Key Stage 3 and Key Stage Care leavers in suitable accommodation 17. Care leavers in education, employment or training 18. Children looked after 12 months or more with a statement of special education need 19. Children looked after 12 months or more with a permanent exclusion 20. Children looked after at least 12 months who have missed 25 days of school or more 21. Children looked after 12 months or more with at least 1 GCSE A*-G 22. Children looked after 12 months or more with 5 or more GCSE A*-G 23. Children looked after 12 months or more in year 11 in 2006/07 in full-time education 24. Persistent absentees in all schools 25. Persistent absentees of boy pupils in all schools 26. Persistent absentees of girl pupils in all schools 27. Percentage of all pupils taking free school meals 28. All pupils with a statement of special education need Date / / / Measure % % % % % % % % % % % % % % England 27.9% 88.4% 64.9% 27.6% 0.7% 13.0% 63.7% 43.1% 66.0% 4.1% 4.1% 4.2% 11.8% 2.8% South West 27.4% 90.6% 69.5% 32.0% 1.0% 12.0% 67.0% 47.0% 72.0% 3.8% 3.6% 3.9% 7.7% 2.6% Torbay 26.3% 100.0% 83.3% 33.0% 0.0% 13.0% 85.0% 65.0% 75.0% 6.5% 6.3% 6.7% 11.1% 4.2% Berry Head-with-Furzeham N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 5.0% 4.3% 5.8% 9.7% 3.8% Blatchcombe N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 8.6% 8.8% 8.4% 16.6% 6.7% Churston-with-Galmpton N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 2.6% 1.3% 4.0% 3.1% 2.5% Clifton-with-Maidenway N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 6.7% 6.2% 7.1% 10.9% 3.9% Cockington-with-Chelston N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 5.1% 6.1% 4.2% 9.4% 3.3% Ellacombe N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 6.4% 6.2% 6.6% 17.7% 4.6% Goodrington-with-Roselands N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 3.7% 3.6% 3.8% 8.7% 4.2% Preston N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 4.7% 4.5% 5.0% 6.4% 4.5% Roundham-with-Hyde N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 6.5% 7.2% 5.7% 18.0% 5.3% St Marychurch N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 6.7% 6.2% 7.2% 11.8% 3.7% St Mary s-with-summercombe N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 6.0% 4.7% 7.5% 9.8% 4.9% Shiphay-with-the-Willows N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 5.5% 5.1% 5.8% 11.1% 3.7% Tormohun N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 9.7% 9.3% 10.2% 18.1% 4.1% Watcombe N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 10.4% 10.4% 10.4% 19.5% 6.1% Wellswood N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 5.2% 5.1% 5.3% 9.4% 3.0% Learning & Skills for the Future notes: indicates where data has been modelled from MLSOA to electoral ward 15. NI 98: Percentage of pupils progressing by 2 levels in Maths between Key Stage 3 and Key Stage 4, 2007 DCSF 16. NI % of former care leavers aged 19 who were looked after on 1 April in their 17th year, who were in suitable accommodation, SSDA903 Return 2007/08, DCSF 17. NI % of former care leavers aged 19 who were looked after on 1 April in their 17th year, who were in education, employment or training, SSDA903 Return 2007/08, DCSF 18. Numbers of Children Looked After continuously for at least 12 months, who have a statement of Special Educational Needs (SEN), year ending 30 September 2007, OC2 Return, DCSF 19. Numbers of Children Looked After continuously for at least 12 months, who have a permanent exclusions from school, year ending 30 September 2007, OC2 Return, DCSF 20. Number of Children Looked After continuously for at least 12 months, who have missed at least 25 days school, year ending 30 September 2007, OC2 Return, DCSF 21. GCSE (or equivalent) performance of Children Looked After continuously for at least 12 months in year 11, who obtained at least 1 GCSE at grade A*-G, OC2 Return at 30 September 2007, DCSF 22. GCSE (or equivalent) performance of Children Looked After continuously for at least 12 months in year 11, who have obtained 5 GCSE s at grade A*-G, OC2 Return at 30 September 2007, DCSF 23. Education and Employment status at 30 September of Children Looked After continuously for at least 12 months in year 11 in school year, who are in full time education, OC2 Return at 30 September 2007, DCSF 24. Persistent Absentees in All Schools - Pupil Absence in Schools by Gender in England (Referenced by Location of Pupil Residence), , ONS 25. Persistent Absentees of Boy Pupils in All Schools - Pupil Absence in Schools by Gender in England (Referenced by Location of Pupil Residence), , 26. Persistent Absentees of Girl Pupils in All Schools - Pupil Absence in Schools by Gender in England (Referenced by Location of Pupil Residence), , 27. Percentage of all pupils taking Free School Meals, Spring 2008, Torbay Council, DCSF 28. All pupils with a statement of Special Education Need, Percentage of all pupils with a statement of Special Education Need, Spring 2008, Torbay Council, DCSF 17

20 Learning & Skills for the Future Table 3 of % of year olds not in education, employment or training (NEET) 30. % of year olds in learning 31. Achievement 32. All people aged 16 to All people aged 16 to 74 with - no qualifications 34. All people aged 16 to 74 with - level 1 qualifications 35. All people aged 16 to 74 with - level 2 qualifications 36. All people aged 16 to 74 with - level 3 qualifications 37. All people aged 16 to 74 with - level 4 / 5 qualifications 38. All people aged 16 to 74 with - other qualifications - level unknown 39. Rank of index education, skills and training deprivation domain Date / Measure % % % 6 Count % % % % % % Rank England 7.0% 77.6% N/A 35,532, % 16.6% 19.4% 8.3% 19.9% 6.9% N/A South West 5.6% 77.9% N/A 3,534, % 17.7% 21.4% 8.6% 18.8% 7.2% N/A Torbay 5.3% 83.3% 93.1% 90, % 19.3% 21.3% 6.8% 13.5% 8.5% N/A Berry Head-with-Furzeham N/A N/A 95.3% 7, % 16.7% 20.4% 6.7% 13.3% 9.8% 30+% to 40% Blatchcombe N/A N/A 91.2% 7, % 21.7% 19.6% 6.2% 10.3% 7.8% 10+% to 20% Churston-with-Galmpton N/A N/A 96.0% 4, % 15.4% 21.4% 6.5% 18.8% 9.7% 70+% to 80% Clifton-with-Maidenway N/A N/A 95.3% 5, % 22.3% 20.9% 6.3% 11.0% 8.4% 30+% to 40% Cockington-with-Chelston N/A N/A 92.7% 7, % 20.1% 22.5% 7.6% 15.2% 8.6% 40+% to 50% Ellacombe N/A N/A 92.9% 5, % 22.5% 22.1% 6.8% 12.2% 7.5% 20+% to 30% Goodrington-with-Roselands N/A N/A 91.3% 4, % 20.1% 22.9% 6.6% 12.0% 9.0% 40+% to 50% Preston N/A N/A 94.6% 7, % 17.5% 21.5% 7.4% 15.5% 8.9% 50+% to 60% Roundham-with-Hyde N/A N/A 95.5% 4, % 20.4% 20.2% 6.1% 10.8% 8.3% 20+% to 30% St Marychurch N/A N/A 92.2% 7, % 18.9% 21.5% 7.0% 13.7% 8.3% 30+% to 40% St Mary s-with-summercombe N/A N/A 94.4% 5, % 18.1% 21.2% 5.8% 11.9% 9.7% 20+% to 30% Shiphay-with-the-Willows N/A N/A 95.0% 5, % 20.6% 23.1% 8.1% 16.1% 7.2% 40+% to 50% Tormohun N/A N/A 88.5% 8, % 20.3% 20.7% 7.5% 11.8% 7.9% 10+% to 20% Watcombe N/A N/A 93.0% 5, % 19.9% 19.3% 4.5% 8.5% 9.5% Top 10% Wellswood N/A N/A 90.2% 5, % 14.7% 22.3% 8.3% 21.5% 7.6% 60+% to 70% Learning & Skills for the Future notes: 6 Indicates that the significance has been derived from the Torbay average and NOT the national average % NEET quarter average of 16 to 18 year olds not in education, employment or training (NEET), Devon and Cornwall Connexions Service % In Learning quarter average of 16 to 18 year olds in learning, Devon and Cornwall Connexions Service 31. Achievement; proportion of learners completing their main qualification and achieved. 2007/08 South Devon College 32. All People aged 16 to 74, 2001 Census, ONS 33. All People aged 16 to 74 with - No qualifications, 2001 Census, ONS 34. All People aged 16 to 74 with - Level 1 qualifications, 2001 Census, ONS 35. All People aged 16 to 74 with - Level 2 qualifications, 2001 Census, ONS 36. All People aged 16 to 74 with - Level 3 qualifications, 2001 Census, ONS 37. All People aged 16 to 74 with - Level 4 / 5 qualifications, 2001 Census, ONS 38. All People aged 16 to 74 with - Other qualifications: Level unknown, 2001 Census, ONS 39. Rank of Education, Skills and Training Deprivation domain - Ranking of average SOA score per ward for the Index of Multiple Deprivation

21 The New Economy The New Economy is one of the local Community Plan themes and means: Building on and developing our traditional industries of fishing and tourism. Encouraging investment and business growth in new businesses that use up-to-date technology. Supporting the development of other growth sectors such as cultural industries. Supporting the renaissance of Torbay with a strong transport infrastructure and affordable housing. Our key findings Torbay s economic worth was in the region of 1,622 million in 2006, or 12,178 per head of population. This measure of economic worth (GVA) is significantly lower for Torbay than the national average of 19,413 per head. There is a heavier dependence on the public sector as well as tourism, with around 68.0% of all employees being employed in these sectors. 81.2% being employed in distribution, hotels & restaurants, banks, finance & insurance and public administration, education & health. On the whole, earnings of both residents and workers in Torbay are significantly lower than the national, with residents earnings, on average, 25% less than the national. Torbay s employment market had a higher than national proportion of employees employed part-time (2001 census). In 2007/08 a third of all notified vacancies were for part-time employment, compared to 23% nationally. There is a distinct benefit economy within Torbay, with some areas having over 25% of the working age population claiming an out-of-work benefit. In early 2009, the Job Seekers Allowance claimant levels reached 4.2%, significantly higher than the 2.2% average for 2007/08. Torbay s level of Job Seekers Allowance claimants is frequently the highest in the South West region. Levels of personal indebtedness in the Bay are higher than the national and vary across the Bay, both in terms of numbers and levels of debt. With around 2.4% of the 16+ population in the Bay having a County Court Judgement made against them. Overall levels of fuel poverty in the Bay are higher than both the national and regional averages, with the three wards of Ellacombe, Roundham with Hyde and Tormohun having significantly higher than national levels of households in fuel poverty. As an illustrative guide to national indicator working age people claiming out-of-work benefits in the worst performing neighbourhoods (statistical geographies - not actual neighbourhoods) can be viewed on page 60. Whilst we have identified indicators relating to the new economy section, we fully acknowledge that there are limitations and gaps due to the data that is available. Some examples of the limitations and future developments for the New Economy data set Data from the 2001 census will not be updated until the 2011 census. Detailed local level income data. Volume of footfall within town centre areas. Further breakdown of the measure of economic worth by standard Industrial Classification and ward. Business survival rates. Vacant premises. Local repossession statistics. Detailed tourism statistics. 19

22 The New Economy Table 1 of Working age population 2. Total gross value added 3. Gross value added per head 4. Board SIC groupings (5, 7 & 8) 5. All VAT based local units 6. VAT based local units - agriculture, production & construction 7. VAT based local units - motor trades, wholesale & transport 8. VAT based local units - retail 9. VAT based local units - hotels & catering 10. VAT based local units - property & business services, post & telecommunications and finance 11. VAT based local units - education, health and public admin & other services 12. All VAT based enterprises 13. All VAT based enterprises - less than 2 years old 14. All VAT based enterprises - 2 to 3 years old 15. All VAT based enterprises - 4 to 9 years old 16. All VAT based enterprises - 10 or more years old Date Measure Count Million per head % Count % % % % % % Count % % % % England 31,626, ,477 19, % 1,792, % 13.2% 12.9% 7.0% 31.8% 12.7% 1,421, % 14.6% 25.6% 42.4% South West 3,114,280 89,090 17, % 197, % 12.3% 12.7% 7.7% 27.1% 11.8% 159, % 13.5% 25.1% 46.0% Torbay 75,670 1,622 12, % 3, % 12.0% 20.9% 13.8% 20.2% 12.6% 2, % 15.9% 28.5% 39.0% Berry Head-with-Furzeham 5,510 N/A N/A 84.0% % 11.4% 24.3% 12.9% 15.7% 12.9% % 14.5% 25.5% 45.5% Blatchcombe 6,490 N/A N/A 54.9% % 15.8% 10.5% 8.8% 22.8% 8.8% % 19.1% 25.5% 42.6% Churston-with-Galmpton 3,290 N/A N/A 81.2% % 11.1% 11.1% 7.4% 18.5% 22.2% % 11.5% 26.9% 46.2% Clifton-with-Maidenway 4,050 N/A N/A 77.1% % 11.8% 5.9% 5.9% 23.5% 11.8% % 15.4% 30.8% 30.8% Cockington-with-Chelston 6,440 N/A N/A 84.4% % 10.4% 14.6% 14.6% 22.9% 14.6% % 11.9% 31.0% 35.7% Ellacombe 4,660 N/A N/A 80.2% % 11.1% 23.6% 11.6% 15.8% 10.7% % 16.3% 29.8% 33.8% Goodrington-with-Roselands 3,950 N/A N/A 63.2% % 10.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 15.0% % 27.8% 27.8% 33.3% Preston 5,480 N/A N/A 88.6% % 14.2% 22.3% 10.7% 24.0% 9.1% % 14.1% 29.5% 38.1% Roundham-with-Hyde 4,230 N/A N/A 87.7% % 9.7% 33.0% 18.4% 17.5% 12.6% % 14.7% 25.0% 45.5% St Marychurch 6,220 N/A N/A 81.4% % 9.1% 21.2% 18.2% 22.7% 9.1% % 16.7% 27.8% 37.0% St Mary s-with-summercombe 3,940 N/A N/A 86.0% % 12.5% 8.3% 8.3% 16.7% 20.8% % 15.0% 30.0% 30.0% Shiphay-with-the-Willows 5,600 N/A N/A 92.2% % 15.8% 18.4% 5.3% 21.1% 15.8% % 13.8% 27.6% 44.8% Tormohun 7,500 N/A N/A 83.0% % 13.7% 28.4% 16.4% 18.4% 10.4% % 17.2% 32.1% 37.2% Watcombe 4,070 N/A N/A 64.3% % 13.3% 13.3% 0.0% 13.3% 26.7% % 16.7% 25.0% 33.3% Wellswood 4,240 N/A N/A 88.3% % 9.4% 11.3% 22.6% 30.2% 15.1% % 17.4% 30.4% 34.8% 20 The New Economy notes: indicates where data has been modelled from MLSOA to electoral ward 1. Working age population Mid Year Estimate, ONS 2. Total Gross Value Added (GVA) ( Million) - GVA measures the contribution to the economy of each individual producer, industry or sector GVA data, ONS 3. Gross Value Added (GVA) per head GVA per head - Total GVA per head of local population, 2006 GVA, ONS 4. Board SIC groupings (5, 7 & 8) top three industrial groups - (Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) - G,H & J,k & L,M,N) Proportion of all employees working in Distribution, hotels, restaurants, Banking, finance, insurance and public administration, education and health. Nomis Annual Business Inquiry 5. All VAT Based Local Units - Local based units are individual site (shop, factory, etc) situated in a geographically identified place. March 2007, ONS 6. VAT Based Local Units - Agriculture, Production & Construction VAT Based Local Units - proportion of aggregated SIC for All VAT based local units, March 2007, ONS 7. VAT Based Local Units - Motor Trades, Wholesale & Transport - proportion of aggregated SIC for All VAT based local units, March 2007, ONS 8. VAT Based Local Units - Retail - proportion of aggregated SIC for All VAT based local units, March 2007, ONS 9. VAT Based Local Units - Hotels & Catering - proportion of aggregated SIC for All VAT based local units, March 2007, ONS 10. VAT Based Local Units - Property & Business Services, Post & Telecommunications and Finance - proportion of aggregated SIC for All VAT based local units, March 2007, ONS 11. VAT Based Local Units - Education, Health and Public Admin & Other Services - proportion of aggregated SIC for All VAT based local units, March 2007, ONS 12. All VAT Based Enterprises - An enterprise is essentially a business. It is generally located at the main operating site or the head office. March 2007, ONS 13. All VAT Based Enterprises - Less than 2 Years Old - proportion of enterprises by age, March 2007, ONS 14. All VAT Based Enterprises - 2 to 3 Years Old - proportion of enterprises by age, March 2007, ONS 15. All VAT Based Enterprises - 4 to 9 Years Old - proportion of enterprises by age, March 2007, ONS 16. All VAT Based Enterprises - 10 or More Years Old - proportion of enterprises by age, March 2007, ONS

23 The New Economy Table 2 of Rateable value - all bulk classes 18. Average weekly household - total income estimate 19. All - median workplace gross - weekly pay 20. Full-time - median workplace gross - weekly pay 21. Part-time median workplace gross - weekly pay 22. All - median workplace gross - hourly pay 23. Full-time - median workplace gross - hourly pay 24. Part-time median workplace gross - hourly pay 25. All - median workplace gross - annual pay 26. Full-time - median workplace gross - annual pay 27. Part-time median workplace gross - annual pay 28. All - mean workplace gross - weekly pay 29. Full-time - mean workplace gross - weekly pay 30. Part-time mean workplace gross - weekly pay 31. All - mean workplace gross - hourly pay 32. Full-time - mean workplace gross - hourly pay Date / Measure / Sq Meter England 66 N/A ,149 25,514 8, South West ,297 23,537 8, Torbay 65 N/A ,899 19,986 8, Berry Head-with-Furzeham N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Blatchcombe N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Churston-with-Galmpton N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Clifton-with-Maidenway N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Cockington-with-Chelston N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Ellacombe N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Goodrington-with-Roselands N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Preston N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Roundham-with-Hyde N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A St Marychurch N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A St Mary s-with-summercombe N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Shiphay-with-the-Willows N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Tormohun N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Watcombe N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Wellswood N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A The New Economy notes: indicates where data has been modelled from MLSOA to electoral ward 17. Rateable Value All Bulk Classes - Rateable Value per m2; All Bulk Classes; (2005 Revaluation) - commercial and industrial rateable value per m2 - Bulk clases include Retail, Office, Factories, & Warehouses. April 2007, ONS 18. Average Weekly Household Total Income Estimate - Modelled from Middle Layer Super Output Area estimates. 2004/2005, ONS 19. All - Median Workplace Gross - Weekly pay: Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings, 2008, ONS 20. Full Time - Median Workplace Gross - Weekly pay: Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings, 2008, ONS 21. Part-Time Median Workplace Gross - Weekly pay: Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings, 2008, ONS 22. All - Median Workplace Gross - Hourly pay: Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings, 2008, ONS 23. Full Time - Median Workplace Gross - Hourly pay: Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings, 2008, ONS 24. Part-Time Median Workplace Gross - Hourly pay: Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings, 2008, ONS 25. All - Median Workplace Gross - Annual pay: Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings, 2008, ONS 26. Full Time - Median Workplace Gross - Annual pay: Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings, 2008, ONS 27. Part-Time Median Workplace Gross - Annual pay: Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings, 2008, ONS 28. All - Mean Workplace Gross - Weekly pay: Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings, 2008, ONS 29. Full Time - Mean Workplace Gross - Weekly pay: Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings, 2008, ONS 30. Part-Time Mean Workplace Gross - Weekly pay: Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings, 2008, ONS 31. All - Mean Workplace Gross - Hourly pay: Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings, 2008, ONS 32. Full Time - Mean Workplace Gross - Hourly pay: Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings, 2008, ONS 21

24 The New Economy Table 3 of Part-time mean workplace gross - hourly pay 34. All - mean workplace gross - annual pay 35. Full-time - mean workplace gross - annual pay 36. Part-time mean workplace gross - annual pay 37. All - median resident gross - weekly pay 38. Full-time - median resident gross - weekly pay 39. Part-time median resident gross - Weekly pay 40. All - median resident gross - hourly pay 41. Full-time - median resident gross - hourly pay 42. Part-time median resident gross - hourly pay 43. All - median resident gross - annual pay 44. Full-time - median resident gross - annual pay 45. Part-time median resident gross - annual pay 46. All - mean resident gross - weekly pay 47. Full-time - mean resident gross - weekly pay 48. Part-time mean resident gross - weekly pay Date Measure England ,688 32,157 10, ,147 25,520 8, South West ,135 28,182 10, ,545 23,930 8, Torbay ,637 24,134 10, ,430 20,108 8, Berry Head-with-Furzeham N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Blatchcombe N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Churston-with-Galmpton N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Clifton-with-Maidenway N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Cockington-with-Chelston N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Ellacombe N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Goodrington-with-Roselands N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Preston N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Roundham-with-Hyde N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A St Marychurch N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A St Mary s-with-summercombe N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Shiphay-with-the-Willows N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Tormohun N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Watcombe N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Wellswood N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 22 The New Economy notes: 33. Part-Time Mean Workplace Gross - Hourly pay: Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings, 2008, ONS 34. All - Mean Workplace Gross - Annual pay: Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings, 2008, ONS 35. Full Time - Mean Workplace Gross - Annual pay: Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings, 2008, ONS 36. Part-Time Mean Workplace Gross - Annual pay: Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings, 2008, ONS 37. All - Median Resident Gross - Weekly pay: Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings, 2008, ONS 38. Full Time - Median Resident Gross - Weekly pay: Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings, 2008, ONS 39. Part-Time Median Resident Gross - Weekly pay: Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings, 2008, ONS 40. All - Median Resident Gross - Hourly pay: Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings, 2008, ONS 41. Full Time - Median Resident Gross - Hourly pay: Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings, 2008, ONS 42. Part-Time Median Resident Gross - Hourly pay: Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings, 2008, ONS 43. All - Median Resident Gross - Annual pay: Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings, 2008, ONS 44. Full Time - Median Resident Gross - Annual pay: Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings, 2008, ONS 45. Part-Time Median Resident Gross - Annual pay: Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings, 2008, ONS 46. All - Mean Resident Gross - Weekly pay: Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings, 2008, ONS 47. Full Time - Mean Resident Gross - Weekly pay: Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings, 2008, ONS 48. Part-Time Mean Resident Gross - Weekly pay: Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings, 2008, ONS

25 The New Economy Table 4 of All - mean resident gross - hourly pay 50. Full-time - mean resident gross - hourly pay 51. Part-time mean resident gross - hourly pay 52. All - mean resident gross - annual pay 53. Full-time - mean resident gross - annual pay 54. Part-time mean resident gross - annual pay 55. All people aged 16 to People aged 16 to 74 - economically active 57. People aged 16 to 74 - economically inactive 58. All aged 16 to 74 in employment 59. All aged 16 to 74 - in employment 60. All aged 16 to 74 - not in employment 61. All aged 16 to 74 working part-time 62. All aged 16 to 74 working full-time 63. All males aged 16 to 74 in employment 64. Males aged 16 to 74 working part-time Date Measure Count % u % Count % u % % % u Count % England ,719 32,203 10,559 35,532, % 33.1% 22,441, % 36.8% 24.6% 75.4% 12,155, % South West ,307 28,348 10,678 3,534, % 32.5% 2,286, % 35.3% 27.3% 72.7% 1,241, % Torbay ,527 22,629 10,088 90, % 36.7% 53, % 41.1% 28.9% 71.1% 28, % Berry Head-with-Furzeham N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 7, % 41.3% 3, % 45.7% 30.4% 69.6% 2, % Blatchcombe N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 7, % 35.5% 4, % 40.3% 27.7% 72.3% 2, % Churston-with-Galmpton N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 4, % 44.0% 2, % 47.0% 33.0% 67.0% 1, % Clifton-with-Maidenway N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 5, % 34.1% 3, % 37.8% 29.2% 70.8% 1, % Cockington-with-Chelston N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 7, % 33.5% 4, % 37.5% 30.0% 70.0% 2, % Ellacombe N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 5, % 32.0% 3, % 37.4% 28.7% 71.3% 1, % Goodrington-with-Roselands N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 4, % 34.3% 3, % 38.1% 28.3% 71.7% 1, % Preston N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 7, % 38.5% 4, % 41.7% 28.3% 71.7% 2, % Roundham-with-Hyde N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 4, % 38.5% 2, % 44.5% 25.9% 74.1% 1, % St Marychurch N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 7, % 36.2% 4, % 40.4% 30.6% 69.4% 2, % St Mary s-with-summercombe N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 5, % 40.9% 2, % 44.8% 29.6% 70.4% 1, % Shiphay-with-the-Willows N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 5, % 28.2% 3, % 31.9% 27.1% 72.9% 2, % Tormohun N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 8, % 34.0% 4, % 40.5% 28.0% 72.0% 2, % Watcombe N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 5, % 39.4% 2, % 43.7% 30.8% 69.2% 1, % Wellswood N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 5, % 42.5% 2, % 46.9% 26.5% 73.5% 1, % The New Economy notes: u indicates where a judgement on the colouring has been made 49. All - Mean Resident Gross - Hourly pay: Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings, 2008, ONS 50. Full Time - Mean Resident Gross - Hourly pay: Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings, 2008, ONS 51. Part-Time Mean Resident Gross - Hourly pay: Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings, 2008, ONS 52. All - Mean Resident Gross - Annual pay: Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings, 2008, ONS 53. Full Time - Mean Resident Gross - Annual pay: Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings, 2008, ONS 54. Part-Time Mean Resident Gross - Annual pay: Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings, 2008, ONS 55. All people aged 16 to Census, ONS 56. People aged 16 to 74 - Economically Active - Includes residents that are full / part time employed, Self employed, unemployed, Full time Students, 2001 Census, ONS 57. People aged 16 to 74 - Economically Inactive - Includes residents that are Retired, Student, Looking after home / family, Permanently sick / disabled, 2001 Census, ONS 58. All aged 16 to 74 in employment Census, ONS 59. All aged 16 to 74 - In employment - Proportion of all people aged 16 to 74 in employment, 2001 Census, ONS 60. All aged 16 to 74 - Not in employment - Proportion of all people aged 16 to 74 not in employment, 2001 Census, ONS 61. All aged 16 to 74 working part-time - as a proportion of all people aged 16 to 74 in employment, 2001 census, ONS 62. All aged 16 to 74 working full-time - as a proportion of all people aged 16 to 74 in employment, 2001 census, ONS 63. All males aged 16 to 74 in employment, 2001 census, ONS 64. Males aged 16 to 74 working part-time - as a proportion of all males aged 16 to 74 in employment, 2001 census, ONS 23

26 The New Economy Table 5 of Males aged 16 to 74 working full-time 66. All females aged 16 to 74 in employment 67. Females aged 16 to 74 working part-time 68. Females aged 16 to 74 working full-time 69. Average (mean) hours worked - male 70. Average (mean) hours worked - female 71. All people aged 16 to 74 in employment - managers and senior officials 72. All people aged 16 to 74 in employment - professional occupations 73. All people aged 16 to 74 in employment - associate professional and technical occupations 74. All people aged 16 to 74 in employment - administrative and secretarial occupations 75. All people aged 16 to 74 in employment - skilled trades occupations 76. All people aged 16 to 74 in employment - personal service occupations 77. All people aged 16 to 74 in employment - sales and customer service occupations 78. All people aged 16 to 74 in employment - process, plant and machine operatives 79. All people aged 16 to 74 in employment - elementary occupations 80. Average monthly notified vacancies as a proportion of the working age population Date /08 Measure % u Count % % u Hours Hours % % % % % % % % % % England 90.4% 10,286, % 57.6% % 11.2% 13.8% 13.4% 11.5% 6.9% 7.7% 8.4% 11.8% 1.0% South West 89.5% 1,044, % 52.8% % 10.3% 13.6% 12.8% 13.3% 7.2% 8.1% 8.1% 12.2% 1.0% Torbay 87.5% 25, % 52.5% % 7.3% 12.5% 11.0% 13.8% 8.8% 9.0% 9.4% 13.0% 1.1% Berry Head-with-Furzeham 86.4% 1, % 50.9% % 7.3% 13.1% 10.0% 14.9% 8.9% 8.2% 9.7% 12.7% 1.1% Blatchcombe 88.9% 1, % 53.3% % 6.1% 12.1% 10.7% 14.4% 7.9% 9.7% 12.4% 14.9% 1.2% Churston-with-Galmpton 85.2% 1, % 46.1% % 10.9% 13.8% 13.0% 10.0% 7.4% 9.2% 8.0% 8.7% 0.5% Clifton-with-Maidenway 88.0% 1, % 51.3% % 6.3% 12.6% 11.5% 15.6% 9.3% 9.8% 11.9% 12.2% 0.1% Cockington-with-Chelston 88.5% 2, % 49.4% % 7.6% 13.5% 12.0% 13.3% 8.5% 8.2% 8.4% 12.0% 0.5% Ellacombe 88.3% 1, % 52.6% % 5.6% 12.4% 10.4% 16.1% 10.7% 8.8% 8.9% 15.2% 1.7% Goodrington-with-Roselands 88.1% 1, % 53.3% % 7.3% 13.1% 12.3% 13.1% 7.4% 10.5% 11.9% 11.4% 0.4% Preston 86.6% 1, % 54.2% % 8.3% 13.6% 12.7% 13.2% 7.9% 8.7% 9.1% 9.7% 0.7% Roundham-with-Hyde 86.7% 1, % 58.8% % 5.5% 9.9% 7.8% 13.0% 8.7% 9.1% 10.7% 15.4% 2.2% St Marychurch 85.9% 2, % 51.2% % 7.3% 11.8% 11.0% 13.3% 10.1% 8.5% 8.4% 14.3% 0.7% St Mary s-with-summercombe 88.8% 1, % 49.5% % 6.9% 11.3% 9.2% 17.8% 9.3% 9.0% 10.5% 11.7% 0.4% Shiphay-with-the-Willows 90.0% 1, % 53.7% % 8.3% 16.0% 13.8% 12.5% 8.1% 9.4% 7.6% 10.3% 1.3% Tormohun 87.1% 2, % 55.0% % 6.2% 10.3% 9.1% 13.3% 9.1% 9.5% 8.8% 16.4% 2.7% Watcombe 87.6% 1, % 49.7% % 4.0% 9.8% 10.7% 16.2% 11.6% 10.4% 9.9% 17.7% 0.2% Wellswood 85.0% 1, % 59.1% % 11.8% 14.0% 10.5% 10.4% 7.8% 6.7% 5.3% 10.4% 1.7% 24 The New Economy notes: u indicates where a judgement on the colouring has been made 65. Males aged 16 to 74 working full-time as a proportion of all males aged 16 to 74 in employment, 2001 census, ONS 66. All females aged 16 to 74 in employment, 2001 census, ONS 67. Females aged 16 to 74 working part-time as a proportion of all females aged 16 to 74 in employment, 2001 census, ONS 68. Females aged 16 to 74 working full-time as a proportion of all females aged 16 to 74 in employment, 2001 census, ONS 69. Average (mean) hours worked: Male, 2001 census, ONS 70. Average (mean) hours worked: Female, 2001 census, ONS 71. All people aged 16 to 74 in employment - Managers and senior officials, 2001 census, ONS 72. All people aged 16 to 74 in employment - Professional occupations, 2001 census, ONS 73. All people aged 16 to 74 in employment - Associate professional and technical occupations, 2001 census, ONS 74. All people aged 16 to 74 in employment - Administrative and secretarial occupations, 2001 census, ONS 75. All people aged 16 to 74 in employment - Skilled trades occupations, 2001 census, ONS 76. All people aged 16 to 74 in employment - Personal service occupations, 2001 census, ONS 77. All people aged 16 to 74 in employment - Sales and customer service occupations, 2001 census, ONS 78. All people aged 16 to 74 in employment - Process; plant and machine operatives, 2001 census, ONS 79. All people aged 16 to 74 in employment - Elementary occupations, 2001 census, ONS 80. Average monthly notified vacancies as a proportion of the working age population, 2007/2008 monthly average, Nomis

27 The New Economy Table 6 of Notified vacancies - full-time vacancies 82. Notified vacancies - part-time vacancies 83. New deal young people (18 to 24) 84. NINo registrations 85. Worker registration scheme 86. National childcare indicator 87. Out of work benefit claimants - total working age 88. Working age people claiming out of work benefits (ni update to base line at ward level) 89. Job seekers allowance 90. Incapacity benefits 91. Lone parent benefits 92. Carer benefits 93. Others on income related benefits 94. Disabled benefits 95. Bereaved benefits 96. Out of work benefit claimants - total working age - male Date 2007/ / / / / / / / / / / / /08 Measure % % % Per 1,000 working age Per 1,000 working age % % % % % % % % % % % England 76.9% 23.1% 1.7% % 13.6% 11.4% 2.1% 6.7% 2.1% 1.0% 0.5% 0.9% 0.3% 49.0% South West 75.2% 24.8% 1.2% % 11.5% 9.4% 1.3% 6.2% 1.5% 0.9% 0.4% 0.9% 0.3% 49.5% Torbay 66.8% 33.2% 2.0% % 18.4% 15.3% 2.2% 10.1% 2.3% 1.5% 0.7% 1.3% 0.3% 52.2% Berry Head-with-Furzeham 46.8% 51.6% 0.9% N/A N/A 13.0% 16.1% 12.9% 1.9% 8.5% 1.5% 1.4% 1.0% 1.5% 0.3% 52.8% Blatchcombe 85.5% 14.5% 3.0% N/A N/A 13.7% 20.2% 16.4% 2.1% 10.6% 3.2% 2.1% 0.6% 1.4% 0.2% 46.2% Churston-with-Galmpton 66.7% 33.3% 0.0% N/A N/A 10.0% 11.6% 8.1% 0.9% 5.8% 0.8% 1.5% 0.6% 1.3% 0.6% 48.0% Clifton-with-Maidenway 50.0% 50.0% 1.1% N/A N/A 14.5% 15.6% 12.4% 1.6% 8.5% 1.7% 1.6% 0.6% 1.1% 0.4% 47.9% Cockington-with-Chelston 80.0% 20.0% 2.1% N/A N/A 19.8% 13.8% 11.2% 2.0% 7.2% 1.6% 1.2% 0.4% 1.1% 0.3% 49.7% Ellacombe 73.8% 27.5% 2.8% N/A N/A 18.2% 22.5% 19.2% 3.1% 11.8% 3.5% 1.3% 0.8% 1.7% 0.3% 54.0% Goodrington-with-Roselands 64.3% 35.7% 1.3% N/A N/A 17.6% 13.8% 10.4% 1.3% 7.4% 1.3% 1.7% 0.4% 1.4% 0.3% 50.0% Preston 63.9% 36.1% 1.4% N/A N/A 13.6% 14.9% 11.9% 1.7% 8.6% 1.1% 1.8% 0.5% 1.0% 0.2% 54.4% Roundham-with-Hyde 62.4% 37.6% 3.5% N/A N/A 14.9% 28.3% 25.0% 3.9% 16.5% 3.3% 1.7% 1.3% 1.3% 0.3% 56.4% St Marychurch 65.2% 32.6% 0.7% N/A N/A 18.3% 16.7% 13.7% 2.1% 9.1% 2.1% 1.3% 0.5% 1.4% 0.3% 52.3% St Mary s-with-summercombe 29.4% 70.6% 2.3% N/A N/A 8.6% 19.3% 15.2% 2.0% 10.3% 2.3% 2.2% 0.6% 1.4% 0.4% 49.0% Shiphay-with-the-Willows 59.7% 40.3% 1.8% N/A N/A 25.0% 13.3% 10.5% 1.4% 6.2% 2.6% 1.3% 0.4% 1.2% 0.3% 43.5% Tormohun 68.3% 31.7% 2.8% N/A N/A 17.0% 26.7% 24.0% 4.2% 15.4% 3.4% 1.3% 1.1% 1.2% 0.2% 56.9% Watcombe 50.0% 40.0% 2.1% N/A N/A 15.5% 22.7% 19.2% 2.3% 11.9% 4.1% 1.9% 0.9% 1.4% 0.2% 48.6% Wellswood 74.3% 25.7% 2.2% N/A N/A 13.8% 18.0% 16.2% 2.0% 12.2% 1.2% 0.8% 0.7% 0.9% 0.2% 62.0% The New Economy notes: Indicates where data has been modelled from MLSOA to electoral ward 81. Notified vacancies - full-time vacancies as a proportion of total notified vacancies, 2007/2008 monthly average, Nomis 82. Notified vacancies - part-time vacancies as a proportion of total notified vacancies, 2007/2008 monthly average, Nomis 83. New Deal Young People (18 to 24) - The New Deal for Young People is aimed at those aged who have been claiming Jobseeker s Allowance (JSA) continuously for 6 months. Figure is a proportion of 18 to 24 age group 2006, ONS 84. NINo registrations (National Insurance Number Allocations to Adult Overseas Nationals entering the UK) rate per 1,000 working age population of National insurance registrations to adult overseas nationals entering the UK in 2007/08, 85. Worker Registration Scheme rate of registered workers (based on Employers address) of workers from an Accession 8 country per 1,000 working age population, 2007 LGAR, ONS 86. National childcare indicator (NI118) - proportion of families benefitting from childcare element of Child and Working Tax Credit, 2006, HMRC 87. Out of work benefit Claimants - Total working age - four quarterly average for 2007/08 (Job Seekers Allowance, Incapacity Benefit, Lone Parents, Carer, others on income related benefits, Disabled & bereaved), ONS 88. Working age people claiming out of work benefits (NI update to base line at ward level) - This does NOT illustrate the worst performing neighbourhoods. 2007/08, ONS 89. Job Seekers Allowance - four quarterly average, proportion of working age population claiming Job Seekers Allowance, 2007/08, ONS 90. Incapacity Benefits - four quarterly average, proportion of working age population claiming Incapacity Benefits, 2007/08, ONS 91. Lone Parent benefits - four quarterly average, proportion of working age population claiming Lone Parent, 2007/08, ONS 92. Carer Benefits - four quarterly average, proportion of working age population claiming Carer, 2007/08, ONS 93. Others on Income Related Benefits - four quarterly average, proportion of working age population claiming Others on Income Related Benefits, 2007/08, ONS 94. Disabled benefits - four quarterly average, proportion of working age population claiming Disabled, 2007/08, ONS 95. Bereaved Benefits - four quarterly average, proportion of working age population claiming Bereaved, 2007/08, ONS 96. Out of work benefit Claimants - Total working age - Male - four quarterly average proportion of benefit claimants that are Male, 2007/08, ONS 25

28 The New Economy Table 7 of Out of work benefit claimants - total working age - female 98. Out of work benefit claimants - total working age - aged Out of work benefit claimants - total working age - aged Out of work benefit claimants - total working age - aged 50 and over 101. All claimants of housing benefit/ council tax benefit 102. All claimants of housing benefit/ council tax benefit - aged All claimants of housing benefit/ council tax benefit - aged 60 and over 104. All claimants of housing benefit/ council tax benefit - single 105. All claimants of housing benefit/ council tax benefit - couple 106. Incapacity benefit and severe disablement allowance claimants - aged Incapacity benefit and severe disablement allowance claimants - aged Incapacity benefit and severe disablement allowance claimants - aged Incapacity benefit and severe disablement allowance claimants - aged 60 and over 110. Incapacity benefit and severe disablement allowance claimants - male 111. Incapacity benefit and severe disablement allowance claimants - female 112. Incapacity benefit and severe disablement allowance claimants - claiming less than 6 months Date 2007/ / / / / / / / / / /08 Measure % % % % Count % % % % % % % % % % % England 51.0% 13.8% 52.4% 33.7% 4,540, % 48.2% 77.1% 22.9% 6.4% 47.9% 32.8% 12.9% 57.7% 42.3% 9.5% South West 50.5% 12.9% 51.6% 35.5% 390, % 52.7% 76.5% 23.5% 7.1% 48.9% 30.9% 13.1% 58.1% 41.9% 9.8% Torbay 47.8% 12.1% 50.2% 37.8% 15, % 50.2% 75.7% 24.4% 6.3% 47.5% 32.2% 14.0% 59.5% 40.5% 9.5% Berry Head-with-Furzeham 47.2% 10.3% 41.1% 48.6% 1, % 62.2% 70.2% 29.8% 4.9% 37.8% 35.5% 21.8% 56.5% 43.5% 8.8% Blatchcombe 53.8% 13.2% 54.0% 32.9% 1, % 46.2% 68.1% 32.3% 7.6% 49.3% 30.6% 12.5% 54.2% 45.8% 9.2% Churston-with-Galmpton 52.0% 7.9% 35.9% 56.2% % 75.6% 59.8% 41.5% 5.0% 32.9% 38.5% 23.6% 60.2% 39.8% 9.3% Clifton-with-Maidenway 52.1% 8.9% 49.7% 41.4% % 53.7% 67.8% 32.2% 5.4% 44.3% 36.8% 13.6% 57.1% 42.9% 9.6% Cockington-with-Chelston 50.3% 11.5% 51.4% 37.1% % 49.7% 73.5% 26.5% 8.2% 45.9% 29.8% 16.1% 57.5% 42.5% 10.0% Ellacombe 46.0% 13.9% 53.5% 32.5% 1, % 41.2% 79.9% 20.1% 6.6% 51.7% 29.8% 11.9% 63.1% 36.9% 11.7% Goodrington-with-Roselands 50.0% 9.2% 45.0% 45.9% % 63.2% 75.0% 26.5% 4.6% 39.8% 36.1% 19.5% 57.7% 42.3% 10.8% Preston 45.6% 8.6% 45.8% 45.6% % 58.2% 73.8% 26.2% 4.6% 43.6% 35.1% 16.8% 57.2% 42.8% 8.8% Roundham-with-Hyde 43.6% 12.0% 52.2% 35.7% 1, % 48.7% 83.2% 17.1% 7.5% 51.1% 30.8% 10.7% 63.0% 37.0% 7.5% St Marychurch 47.7% 11.4% 50.6% 38.0% 1, % 55.9% 77.8% 21.9% 6.1% 46.9% 32.1% 15.0% 57.7% 42.3% 11.3% St Mary s-with-summercombe 51.0% 13.0% 46.4% 40.6% % 55.2% 69.5% 31.0% 6.7% 43.6% 32.9% 16.8% 58.2% 41.8% 10.1% Shiphay-with-the-Willows 56.5% 12.9% 49.8% 37.2% % 51.9% 70.6% 29.4% 6.0% 44.3% 36.2% 13.5% 54.6% 45.4% 10.3% Tormohun 43.1% 15.3% 54.2% 30.4% 2, % 34.1% 85.2% 14.6% 6.9% 55.3% 29.4% 8.3% 62.4% 37.6% 10.1% Watcombe 51.4% 13.4% 52.7% 33.9% % 50.3% 71.8% 28.7% 7.2% 48.5% 30.3% 14.1% 59.0% 41.0% 8.7% Wellswood 38.0% 7.2% 49.6% 43.2% % 46.6% 85.3% 14.1% 4.2% 49.1% 32.3% 14.4% 66.5% 33.5% 6.8% 26 The New Economy notes: Indicates where data has been modelled from MLSOA to electoral ward 97. Out of work benefit Claimants - Total working age - Female - four quarterly average proportion of benefit claimants that are Female, 2007/08, ONS 98. Out of work benefit Claimants - Total working age - Aged four quarterly average proportion of benefit claimants that are aged 16-24, 2007/08, ONS 99. Out of work benefit Claimants - Total working age - Aged four quarterly average proportion of benefit claimants that are aged 25-49, 2007/08, ONS 100. Out of work benefit Claimants - Total working age - Aged 50 and Over - four quarterly average proportion of benefit claimants that are aged 50 and over, 2007/08, ONS 101. All Claimants of Housing Benefit / Council Tax Benefit - Aug 2005, ONS 102. All Claimants of Housing Benefit / Council Tax Benefit - Aged proportion of all Claimants of Housing Benefit/ Council Tax Benefit aged 16-59, Aug 2005, ONS 103. All Claimants of Housing Benefit / Council Tax Benefit - Aged 60 and Over - proportion of all Claimants of Housing Benefit/Council Tax Benefit aged 60 and over, Aug 2005, ONS 104. All Claimants of Housing Benefit / Council Tax Benefit - Single - proportion of all Claimants of Housing Benefit/Council Tax Benefit that are single, Aug 2005, ONS 105. All Claimants of Housing Benefit / Council Tax Benefit - Couple - proportion of all Claimants of Housing Benefit/Council Tax Benefit that are a couple, Aug 2005, ONS 106. Incapacity Benefit and Severe Disablement Allowance Claimants - aged proportion of Incapacity and Severe Disablement Allowance Claimants aged 16-24, 2007/08, Nomis 107. Incapacity Benefit and Severe Disablement Allowance Claimants - aged proportion of Incapacity and Severe Disablement Allowance Claimants aged 25-49, 2007/08, Nomis 108. Incapacity Benefit and Severe Disablement Allowance Claimants - aged proportion of Incapacity and Severe Disablement Allowance Claimants aged 50-59, 2007/08, Nomis 109. Incapacity Benefit and Severe Disablement Allowance Claimants - aged 60 and Over - proportion of Incapacity and Severe Disablement Allowance Claimants aged 60 and Over, 2007/08, Nomis 110. Incapacity Benefit and Severe Disablement Allowance Claimants - Male - proportion of Incapacity and Severe Disablement Allowance Claimants that are Male, 2007/08, Nomis 111. Incapacity Benefit and Severe Disablement Allowance Claimants - Female - proportion of Incapacity and Severe Disablement Allowance Claimants that are Female, 2007/08, Nomis 112. Incapacity Benefit and Severe Disablement Allowance Claimants - Claiming less than 6 months - proportion of Incapacity and Severe Disablement Allowance Claimants claiming for less than 6 months, 2007/08, Nomis

29 The New Economy Table 8 of Incapacity benefit and severe disablement allowance claimants - claiming 6 months up to 1 year 114. Incapacity benefit and severe disablement allowance claimants - claiming 1 year and up to 2 years 115. Incapacity benefit and severe disablement allowance claimants - claiming 2 years and up to 5 years 116. Incapacity benefit and severe disablement allowance claimants - claiming 5 years and over 117. Incapacity benefit and severe disablement allowance claimants disease code - mental disease 118. Incapacity benefit and severe disablement allowance claimants disease code - nervous system 119. Incapacity benefit and severe disablement allowance claimants disease code - respiratory or circulatory 120. Incapacity benefit and severe disablement allowance claimants disease code - musculoskeletal 121. Incapacity benefit and severe disablement allowance claimants disease code - injury, poisoning 122. Incapacity benefit and severe disablement allowance claimants disease code - other 123. Total number of county court judgements (CCJs) 124. Proportion of total CCJs population 125. Average value of CCJs 126. CCJs with a value - less than CCJs with a value - between CCJs with a value - between Date 2007/ / / / / / / / / / Measure % % % % % % % % % % Count % % % % England 6.2% 8.9% 19.9% 55.5% 41.3% 6.3% 7.4% 17.5% 5.6% 21.8% 745, % 1, % 24.7% 18.1% South West 6.8% 9.5% 20.2% 53.7% 42.9% 7.0% 6.1% 16.2% 6.4% 21.4% 70, % 1, % 22.4% 21.8% Torbay 6.4% 8.6% 20.2% 55.2% 41.8% 5.9% 6.6% 16.6% 6.2% 22.8% 2, % 2, % 20.5% 28.9% Berry Head-with-Furzeham 4.7% 8.0% 18.4% 60.1% 35.0% 6.7% 7.5% 17.4% 7.5% 25.9% % 4, % 23.1% 24.9% Blatchcombe 6.2% 9.4% 25.0% 50.2% 38.4% 6.9% 8.0% 18.1% 6.3% 22.3% % 2, % 17.9% 33.2% Churston-with-Galmpton 6.2% 7.5% 17.4% 59.6% 28.0% 8.7% 10.6% 23.6% 6.2% 23.0% % 1, % 8.3% 38.9% Clifton-with-Maidenway 6.8% 10.4% 25.0% 48.2% 32.1% 8.2% 5.4% 21.1% 6.8% 26.4% % 1, % 21.5% 28.9% Cockington-with-Chelston 7.7% 7.9% 21.1% 53.3% 36.7% 7.9% 7.1% 17.9% 7.4% 23.0% % 1, % 26.2% 25.6% Ellacombe 8.2% 8.4% 20.1% 51.7% 46.8% 4.2% 5.1% 14.8% 7.3% 21.9% % 1, % 20.1% 28.1% Goodrington-with-Roselands 6.2% 7.5% 17.0% 58.5% 39.4% 5.0% 6.6% 16.6% 5.4% 27.0% % 1, % 15.2% 20.3% Preston 5.4% 7.7% 15.2% 62.9% 36.6% 8.0% 7.5% 15.5% 5.7% 26.8% % 1, % 18.9% 26.7% Roundham-with-Hyde 5.7% 8.9% 23.0% 55.0% 51.8% 4.3% 5.3% 13.3% 5.7% 19.6% % 1, % 20.3% 27.3% St Marychurch 6.9% 8.0% 16.7% 57.1% 39.7% 6.1% 6.3% 18.4% 6.7% 22.8% % 1, % 16.8% 32.9% St Mary s-with-summercombe 4.9% 7.0% 20.1% 57.9% 32.9% 7.3% 7.9% 20.7% 6.7% 24.4% % 2, % 21.3% 28.7% Shiphay-with-the-Willows 7.1% 9.2% 20.9% 52.5% 32.6% 7.1% 6.4% 23.4% 8.2% 22.3% % 1, % 22.8% 29.7% Tormohun 7.5% 10.3% 20.7% 51.4% 51.7% 4.6% 6.1% 12.7% 4.8% 20.1% % 1, % 22.5% 28.2% Watcombe 6.7% 8.7% 19.5% 56.4% 41.3% 3.1% 7.2% 19.0% 5.6% 23.8% % 1, % 20.9% 34.5% Wellswood 5.2% 7.1% 18.2% 62.7% 50.0% 5.4% 5.4% 11.8% 5.7% 21.7% % 7, % 18.9% 25.0% The New Economy notes: Indicates where data has been modelled from MLSOA to electoral ward 113. Incapacity Benefit and Severe Disablement Allowance Claimants - Claiming 6 months up to 1 year- proportion of Incapacity and Severe Disablement Allowance Claimants claiming for between 6 months and one year, 2007/08, Nomis 114. Incapacity Benefit and Severe Disablement Allowance Claimants - Claiming 1 year and up to 2 years - proportion of Incapacity and Severe Disablement Allowance Claimants claiming for between one and two years, 2007/08, Nomis 115. Incapacity Benefit and Severe Disablement Allowance Claimants - Claiming 2 years and up to 5 years - proportion of Incapacity and Severe Disablement Allowance Claimants claiming for between two and five years, 2007/08, Nomis 116. Incapacity Benefit and Severe Disablement Allowance Claimants - Claiming 5 years and over - proportion of Incapacity and Severe Disablement Allowance Claimants claiming for over five years, 2007/08, Nomis 117. Incapacity Benefit and Severe Disablement Allowance Claimants Disease code - Mental, proportion of claimants with mental disease classification, 2007/08, Nomis 118. Incapacity Benefit and Severe Disablement Allowance Claimants Disease code - Nervous System, proportion of claimants with Nervous System disease classification, 2007/08, Nomis 119. Incapacity Benefit and Severe Disablement Allowance Claimants Disease code - Respiratory or Circulatory, proportion of claimants with Respiratory or Circulatory disease classification, 2007/08, Nomis 120. Incapacity Benefit and Severe Disablement Allowance Claimants Disease code - Musculoskeletal, proportion of claimants with Muscoskeletal disease classification, 2007/08, Nomis 121. Incapacity Benefit and Severe Disablement Allowance Claimants Disease code - Injury, poisoning, proportion of claimants with Injury, poisoning disease classification, 2007/08, Nomis 122. Incapacity Benefit and Severe Disablement Allowance Claimants Disease code - Other, proportion of claimants with Other disease classification, 2007/08, Nomis 123. Total Number of County Court Judgements (CCJs) - Total number of unmanaged consumer debt based on County Court Judgements, figures refer to judgements taken out against individuals for outstanding personal debts of 1 or more. 2005, ONS 124. Proportion of Total CCJs population, 2005, ONS 125. Average Value of CCJs, Average Value of unmanaged debt, 2005, ONS 126. CCJs With a Value; Less Than 251, 2005, ONS 127. CCJs With a Value; Between , 2005, ONS 128. CCJs With a Value; Between , 2005, ONS 27

30 The New Economy Table 9 of CCJs with a value - greater than Number of people seeking debt advice 131. Average value of debt - loans / credit & store cards 132. Average value of debt - other 133. Average value of debt - total 134. Rate of people accessing CAB debt services 135. Total occupied households 136. Occupied households in fuel poverty - full income 137. Occupied households in fuel poverty - basic income 138. Occupied households in fuel poverty - full income (equivalised) 139. Occupied households in fuel poverty - basic income (equivalised) 140. Transactions by dwelling type - total sales 141. Price indicators for all dwellings - lower quartile 142. Price indicators for all dwellings - median 143. Price indicators for all dwellings - upper quartile 144. Transactions by dwelling type - flat Date / / / / / / / / / Measure % Count Per 1,000 aged Count % % % % Count % England 28.0% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 20,455, % 6.9% 5.5% 6.3% 1,223, , , , % South West 27.7% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 2,086, % 6.8% 5.3% 5.9% 138, , , , % Torbay 29.4% 1,698 5,566 1,613 3, , % 7.1% 5.8% 6.3% 3, , , , % Berry Head-with-Furzeham 32.4% ,047 2,757 8, , % 7.4% 6.1% 6.6% , , , % Blatchcombe 30.7% 166 4,748 2,053 3, , % 6.9% 5.5% 6.1% , , , % Churston-with-Galmpton 44.4% * 5,559 2,341 4,423 * 3, % 5.5% 3.7% 3.6% , , , % Clifton-with-Maidenway 24.8% 107 3, , , % 6.8% 5.3% 5.6% , , , % Cockington-with-Chelston 28.6% 96 5,359 1,302 3, , % 6.9% 5.7% 6.0% , , , % Ellacombe 30.4% 109 6,646 1,086 4, , % 8.7% 7.6% 8.5% , , , % Goodrington-with-Roselands 39.2% 88 3,004 1,025 2, , % 6.1% 4.7% 4.8% , , , % Preston 32.3% 87 4,340 1,002 2, , % 6.5% 5.1% 5.2% , , , % Roundham-with-Hyde 26.0% 140 4, , , % 8.2% 7.2% 8.0% , , , % St Marychurch 31.2% 192 4,122 3,266 3, , % 7.5% 6.2% 6.7% , , , % St Mary s-with-summercombe 35.2% * 8, , , % 6.9% 5.5% 5.9% , , , % Shiphay-with-the-Willows 20.3% 101 4,682 1,033 2, , % 6.3% 4.9% 5.3% , , , % Tormohun 27.2% 170 8,522 1,495 5, , % 8.4% 7.5% 8.4% , , , % Watcombe 26.2% 154 3,326 1,524 2, , % 7.2% 5.6% 6.4% , , , % Wellswood 34.8% 104 6,273 3,541 5, , % 7.0% 5.5% 6.0% , , , % 28 The New Economy notes: Indicates where data has been modelled from MLSOA to electoral ward 6 Indicates that the significance has been derived from the Torbay average and NOT the national average * Not published due to small figures 129. CCJs With a Value; Greater Than 1000, 2005, ONS 130. Number of people seeking debt advice, 2007/08, Torbay Citizens Advice Bureau 131. Average value of debt - Loans / Credit & Store Cards, 2007/08, Torbay Citizens Advice Bureau 132. Average value of debt - Other, 2007/08, Torbay Citizens Advice Bureau 133. Average value of debt - Total, 2007/08, Torbay Citizens Advice Bureau 134. Rate of people accessing CAB debt services, 2007/08, Torbay Citizens Advice Bureau 135. Total Occupied Households, 2001 Census, ONS 136. Occupied Households in Fuel poverty full income - this represents the official Government definition of fuel poverty. Income includes housing benefit and Income Support for Mortgage Interest Relief and Council Tax Benefit. prediction based on 2001 census, and 2003 English Housing Condition Survey, prediction based on 2001 census, and 2003 English Housing Condition Survey, Occupied Households in Fuel poverty basic income - this model excludes incomes relating to housing benefit and Income Support for Mortgage Interest Relief and Council Tax Benefit. prediction based on 2001 census, and 2003 English Housing Condition Survey, Occupied Households in Fuel poverty full income (equivalised) - this is similar to the full income definition, with the exception that incomes are equivalised; income is adjusted to take account of differences in household size and composition. prediction based on 2001 census, and 2003 English Housing Condition Survey, Occupied Households in Fuel poverty basic income (equivalised) - this is similar to the basic income definition, with the exception that incomes are equivalised; income is adjusted to take account of differences in household size and composition. prediction based on 2001 census, and 2003 English Housing Condition Survey, Transactions by Dwelling Type; Total Sales - all dwelling transactions during ONS, Communities and Local Government 141. Price Indicators for All Dwellings; Lower Quartile prices are the prices of the lower quarter of all prices, ONS, Communities and Local Government 142. Price Indicators for All Dwellings; Median is the price at which the number of lower priced transactions is equal to the bumber of higher priced transactions ONS, Communities and Local Government 143. Price Indicators for All Dwellings; Upper Quartile prices are the prices of the upper quarter of all prices, ONS, Communities and Local Government 144. Transactions by Dwelling Type; Flat - proportion of all dwelling transactions that were for flats, ONS, Communities and Local Government

31 The New Economy Table 10 of Price indicators by dwelling type - flat - median 146. Transactions by dwelling type - terraced 147. Price indicators by dwelling type - terraced - median 148. Transactions by dwelling type - semi-detached 149. Price indicators by dwelling type - semi-detached - median 150. Transactions by dwelling type - detached 151. Price indicators by dwelling type - detached - median 152. Transactions by dwelling type - total sales - type of sale - cash 153. Transactions by dwelling type - total sales - type of sale - mortgage 154. Income Deprivation Ranking 155. Employment Deprivation Ranking Date Measure % % % % % Rank Rank England 155, % 138, % 163, % 250, % 79.4% N/A N/A South West 136, % 154, % 176, % 267, % 73.7% N/A N/A Torbay 117, % 147, % 172, % 245, % 68.7% N/A N/A Berry Head-with-Furzeham 116, % 159, % 179, % 241, % 59.7% 30+% to 40% 10+% to 20% Blatchcombe 114, % 149, % 156, % 210, % 75.8% 10+% to 20% 10+% to 20% Churston-with-Galmpton N/A 14.3% 172, % 197, % 250, % 56.5% 50+% to 60% 40+% to 50% Clifton-with-Maidenway 106, % 137, % 165, % 211, % 72.8% 30+% to 40% 20+% to 30% Cockington-with-Chelston 144, % 151, % 190, % 295, % 76.8% 30+% to 40% 30+% to 40% Ellacombe 102, % 145, % 185, % 232, % 81.8% 10+% to 20% Top 10% Goodrington-with-Roselands 116, % 157, % 174, % 236, % 67.6% 30+% to 40% 20+% to 30% Preston 120, % 155, % 183, % 239, % 65.0% 30+% to 40% 20+% to 30% Roundham-with-Hyde 122, % 140, % 208, % 281, % 60.2% Top 10% Top 10% St Marychurch 122, % 154, % 194, % 262, % 65.8% 20+% to 30% 20+% to 30% St Mary s-with-summercombe 113, % 149, % 166, % 245, % 69.0% 10+% to 20% 10+% to 20% Shiphay-with-the-Willows 106, % 150, % 166, % 238, % 75.4% 30+% to 40% 40+% to 50% Tormohun 96, % 141, % 190, % 285, % 69.5% Top 10% Top 10% Watcombe 101, % 128, % 156, % 225, % 76.1% 10+% to 20% 10+% to 20% Wellswood 147, % 206, % 259, % 380, % 61.1% 20+% to 30% 10+% to 20% The New Economy notes: Indicates where data has been modelled from MLSOA to electoral ward 145. Price Indicators by Dwelling Type; Flat - Median price of flats, ONS, Communities and Local Government 146. Transactions by Dwelling Type; Terraced proportion of all dwelling transactions that were for terraced dwellings, ONS, Communities and Local Government 147. Price Indicators by Dwelling Type; Terraced - Median - Median price of terraced dwellings, ONS, Communities and Local Government 148. Transactions by Dwelling Type; Semi-detached proportion of all dwelling transactions that were for semi-detached dwellings, ONS, Communities and Local Government 149. Price Indicators by Dwelling Type; Semi-detached - Median price of semi-detached dwellings, ONS, Communities and Local Government 150. Transactions by Dwelling Type; Detached proportion of all dwelling transactions that were for detached dwellings, ONS, Communities and Local Government 151. Price Indicators by Dwelling Type; Detached - Median price of detached dwellings, ONS, Communities and Local Government 152. Transactions by Dwelling Type; Total Sales - Type of Sale; Cash. proportion of all dwelling transactions made as a cash transaction, ONS, Communities and Local Government 153. Transactions by Dwelling Type; Total Sales - Type of Sale; Mortgage. proportion of all dwelling transactions made as a mortgage transaction, ONS, Communities and Local Government 154. Income Deprivation Ranking - Ranking of average SOA score per ward for the Index of Multiple Deprivation Employment Deprivation Ranking - Ranking of average SOA score per ward for the Index of Multiple Deprivation

32 Stronger Communities The promotion of Stronger Communities means that: People feel safe. People have access to good quality housing and support, education, training and employment. People live in healthier communities and have happy, independent and healthy lives. People can develop their own communities and treat each other with respect and consideration. Older people feel valued, contribute and benefit from the Bay s improved economy. This links to other parts of the Wheel through support in strong local communities, with the development of young people with skills and positive aspirations for the future of the Bay, and the empowerment of older people to contribute fully to economic and social well-being. Our key findings The profile of Torbay s housing stock in 2001 showed high levels of owner-occupied; and also high levels of private rented. On the whole, social housing levels in the Bay are lower, there are, however, two wards with significantly higher levels. The 2006 housing condition survey showed that 80% (4 out of 5 wards) have a significantly higher proportion of private sector dwelling classified as non-decent compared to the national. The rate of homeless and in priority need applications to local authority was significantly lower in Torbay at 1.8 per 1,000 households compared to 3.0 per 1,000 nationally. The average number of admissions to hospital per year (over a 3-year period) in the Bay was around 33,400. This is lower than we would expect for Torbay; admissions in Watcombe were, on average, around 10% higher than expected. Tormohun residents had significantly higher than expected levels of non-elective admissions (emergency), around 10% higher than expected. Alcohol-related admissions to hospital in 2006/07 were around 1,621 per 100,000 population in Torbay, significantly higher than the national 1,384 per 100,000. Teenage conceptions rates in the Bay are the highest in the South West region, and are significantly higher than the national rate. Public perception (2006) of different types of Anti-Social Behaviour (ASB), including drunk and rowdy behaviour and vandalism are significantly higher than national levels. Local research shows that in, general, the perception of ASB feeds people s fear of crime that consequently has a negative impact on their quality of life. Overall, the levels of recorded crime in Torbay are well below the national rates. However violent crime against the person in Torbay is higher than the national average. A significant proportion of these crimes are attributed to domestic abuse incidents. Whilst we have identified indicators relating to the stronger communities section, we fully acknowledge that there are limitations and gaps due to the data that is available. Some examples of the limitations and future developments for the Stronger Communities data set Data from the 2001 census will not be updated until the 2011 census. Domestic abuse levels. Recorded crime with drug and alcohol links. Internet connectivity of households. Disabled facilities grants. Disease survival rates per ward. Updated perception on anti-social behaviour. Predictive modelling around future disease prevalences. 30

33 Stronger Communities Table 1 of 8 1. Total housing stock 2. Occupied household spaces 3. Owned occupied 4. Private rented 5. Social rented 6. Communal establishment residents 7. Vacant household spaces 8. Second residence / holiday accommodations 9. Total housing stock accommodation type - detached 10. Total housing stock accommodation type - semi-detached 11. Total housing stock accommodation type - terraced (including end terrace) 12. Total housing stock accommodation type - purpose built block of flats or tenement 13. Total housing stock accommodation type - converted/in commercial building 14. Total housing stock accommodation type - caravan or other mobile or temporary structure 15. All occupied households - overcrowding 16. All occupied households - no central heating Date Measure Count % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % England 21,262, % 68.7% 10.0% 19.3% 1.7% 3.2% 0.6% 22.5% 31.6% 25.8% 14.0% 5.7% 0.4% 7.1% 8.5% South West 2,185, % 73.1% 11.2% 13.5% 2.1% 2.8% 1.8% 30.9% 27.9% 23.8% 10.0% 6.5% 0.8% 5.0% 9.8% Torbay 60, % 74.0% 16.6% 8.2% 2.2% 3.0% 2.0% 22.4% 23.8% 25.1% 14.8% 13.5% 0.4% 7.3% 14.7% Berry Head-with-Furzeham 5, % 75.1% 17.7% 5.8% 1.0% 2.4% 5.5% 26.6% 19.4% 28.8% 14.3% 10.5% 0.3% 6.4% 14.3% Blatchcombe 4, % 70.5% 7.4% 20.7% 0.0% 2.3% 0.7% 20.1% 39.7% 20.7% 13.3% 2.8% 3.4% 6.2% 15.3% Churston-with-Galmpton 3, % 89.9% 4.6% 4.4% 1.3% 1.3% 0.8% 63.4% 18.9% 12.8% 2.9% 1.8% 0.2% 1.9% 5.7% Clifton-with-Maidenway 3, % 85.2% 10.9% 3.3% 1.2% 2.6% 0.5% 23.8% 38.0% 24.9% 4.3% 8.7% 0.2% 4.4% 15.3% Cockington-with-Chelston 4, % 78.5% 15.3% 5.0% 2.0% 2.1% 0.9% 23.7% 23.9% 31.4% 8.8% 12.2% 0.1% 5.6% 16.2% Ellacombe 3, % 67.7% 27.1% 4.1% 1.6% 3.8% 0.2% 3.4% 10.2% 53.8% 13.0% 19.6% 0.1% 9.5% 24.5% Goodrington-with-Roselands 3, % 82.5% 8.7% 7.3% 0.7% 1.6% 1.4% 29.6% 36.4% 14.2% 12.5% 6.3% 1.0% 5.5% 10.5% Preston 4, % 83.1% 12.5% 3.2% 2.9% 3.0% 1.2% 38.9% 26.6% 8.1% 12.2% 14.3% 0.0% 4.5% 8.8% Roundham-with-Hyde 3, % 59.4% 30.2% 8.8% 5.6% 4.8% 3.7% 4.5% 8.9% 27.4% 26.9% 32.2% 0.1% 15.4% 23.1% St Marychurch 5, % 74.9% 19.0% 4.8% 4.7% 3.3% 1.9% 10.6% 20.9% 37.2% 14.7% 16.6% 0.1% 6.7% 16.7% St Mary s-with-summercombe 3, % 79.4% 10.7% 9.0% 1.5% 1.8% 1.0% 27.9% 35.1% 22.5% 9.7% 4.6% 0.2% 4.7% 15.1% Shiphay-with-the-Willows 3, % 77.9% 10.5% 10.2% 0.2% 2.4% 0.4% 23.6% 43.2% 22.9% 7.6% 2.3% 0.4% 3.7% 9.3% Tormohun 5, % 55.0% 32.3% 11.5% 3.2% 4.8% 1.4% 7.9% 10.5% 28.2% 24.4% 29.0% 0.0% 16.3% 19.2% Watcombe 3, % 71.2% 5.2% 22.2% 0.3% 1.5% 0.4% 20.9% 35.8% 29.3% 12.0% 2.0% 0.1% 5.6% 14.5% Wellswood 4, % 69.2% 25.5% 3.9% 6.4% 5.8% 8.0% 23.4% 6.0% 11.7% 34.3% 24.5% 0.0% 9.7% 10.8% Stronger Communities notes: 1. Total Housing Stock Census, ONS 2. Occupied Household Spaces - Total occupied household spaces with residents, 2001 Census, ONS 3. Owned Occupied - Proportion of occupied households that are owner occupied - Owns outright, Owns with a mortgage or loan, Shared ownership, Private rented - Proportion of occupied households that are private rented, 2001 Census, ONS 5. Social rented - Proportion of occupied households that are rented from a housing association or Rented from Council (Local Authority), 2001 Census, ONS 6. Communal Establishment Residents - Proportion of resident population living in communal establishments, 2001 Census, ONS 7. Vacant Households Spaces - Vacant with no residents, 2001 Census, ONS 8. Second Residence / Holiday Accommodations - Vacant with no residents, 2001 Census, ONS 9. Total Housing Stock Accommodation Type - Detached: Whole house or bungalow, 2001 Census, ONS 10. Total Housing Stock Accommodation Type - Semi-detached: Whole house or bungalow, 2001 Census, ONS 11. Total Housing Stock Accommodation Type - Terraced (including end terrace): Whole house or bungalow, 2001 Census, ONS 12. Total Housing Stock Accommodation Type - Purpose Built block of flats or tenement: Flat; maisonette or apartment, 2001 Census, ONS 13. Total Housing Stock Accommodation Type - converted / In commercial building: Flat; maisonette or apartment: Part of a converted or shared house (including bed-sits) or In commercial building, 2001 Census, ONS 14. Total Housing Stock Accommodation Type - Caravan or other mobile or temporary structure: Caravan or other mobile or temporary structure, 2001 Census, ONS 15. All Occupied Households - Overcrowding, 2001 Census, ONS 16. All Occupied Households - No central heating, 2001 Census, ONS 31

34 Stronger Communities Table 2 of Households with no cars or vans 18. Households with two or more cars or vans 19. All council tax rateable dwellings 20. All council tax rateable dwellings - Band a 21. All council tax rateable dwellings - Band A 22. All council tax rateable dwellings - Band C 23. All council tax rateable dwellings - Band D 24. All council tax rateable dwellings - Band E 25. All council tax rateable dwellings - Band F+ 26. Private sector dwellings 27. Non decent as a percentage of all private sector dwellings 28. Inadequate thermal comfort as a percentage of all private sector dwellings 29. Disrepair as a percentage of all private sector dwellings 30. Vulnerable households as a percentage of all private sector dwellings 31. Vulnerable households in non decent dwellings as a percentage of all private sector dwellings 32. Housing waiting list Date /07 Measure % % Count % % % % % % Count % % % % % % England 26.8% 29.5% 22,082, % 19.3% 21.6% 15.2% 9.5% 9.1% 21,060, % 24.7% 9.2% 15.9% 7.4% 8.0% South West 20.2% 33.6% 2,275, % 24.4% 23.1% 15.8% 10.6% 8.8% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 7.3% Torbay 26.8% 25.1% 62, % 26.3% 25.2% 15.1% 7.9% 5.7% 55, % 36.5% 16.1% 21.5% 12.1% 6.7% Berry Head-with-Furzeham 28.2% 21.4% 5, % 22.2% 26.7% 20.3% 7.9% 4.6% 4, % 39.2% 15.9% 22.8% 13.1% N/A Blatchcombe 21.9% 27.2% 4, % 32.2% 27.8% 11.5% 8.1% 1.5% 3, % 32.6% 10.6% 23.1% 12.4% N/A Churston-with-Galmpton 16.7% 32.8% 3, % 10.4% 26.6% 23.5% 26.4% 11.7% 3, % 23.6% 7.0% 16.3% 7.1% N/A Clifton-with-Maidenway 22.6% 25.8% 3, % 35.9% 34.4% 14.1% 5.0% 1.7% 3, % 36.3% 15.4% 22.3% 12.0% N/A Cockington-with-Chelston 19.4% 31.3% 4, % 28.6% 23.9% 14.0% 10.1% 13.1% 4, % 33.9% 15.2% 19.6% 11.3% N/A Ellacombe 32.3% 20.6% 3, % 39.9% 19.8% 7.2% 1.9% 0.5% 3, % 48.6% 26.2% 25.6% 16.6% N/A Goodrington-with-Roselands 23.6% 28.9% 3, % 15.3% 42.8% 20.7% 6.4% 3.2% 2, % 29.4% 9.8% 19.0% 9.0% N/A Preston 23.2% 30.6% 4, % 14.6% 30.8% 26.7% 10.7% 4.9% 4, % 31.7% 14.5% 19.4% 10.4% N/A Roundham-with-Hyde 43.4% 13.7% 4, % 30.8% 14.9% 6.8% 3.5% 1.6% 3, % 50.3% 24.5% 26.7% 17.3% N/A St Marychurch 29.5% 23.3% 5, % 32.1% 28.8% 12.1% 4.0% 6.3% 4, % 40.2% 20.3% 21.9% 13.1% N/A St Mary s-with-summercombe 24.6% 25.8% 3, % 31.5% 30.4% 13.3% 7.3% 5.2% 2, % 37.2% 13.3% 23.6% 13.3% N/A Shiphay-with-the-Willows 16.8% 32.9% 3, % 22.8% 33.6% 24.7% 9.2% 2.0% 3, % 23.1% 8.7% 17.4% 8.3% N/A Tormohun 40.9% 16.3% 5, % 25.6% 13.8% 7.7% 4.0% 1.8% 4, % 44.5% 24.9% 23.3% 14.2% N/A Watcombe 27.9% 24.2% 3, % 41.8% 20.1% 15.5% 5.0% 2.4% 2, % 31.7% 10.9% 24.5% 12.9% N/A Wellswood 25.3% 24.9% 4, % 15.3% 14.3% 13.3% 12.3% 22.2% 4, % 37.6% 16.2% 17.5% 9.9% N/A 32 Stronger Communities notes: 17. Households with no cars or vans - Proportion of occupied households with no cars or vans, 2001 Census, ONS 18. Households with two or more, cars or vans - Proportion of occupied households with 2 or more cars and or vans, 2001 Census, ONS 19. All Council Tax Rateable Dwellings - Council Tax valuation lists have been provided by the Value Office Agency (VOA) and the Department for Communities and Local Government (CLG) to facilitate assessment of the overall number of domestic properties and their distribution across specific Council Tax bands, ONS 20. All Council Tax Rateable Dwellings - Band A - Proportion of all overall domestic properties within Band A, 2006 CLG, 21. All Council Tax Rateable Dwellings - Band B - Proportion of all overall domestic properties within Band B, 2006 CLG, 22. All Council Tax Rateable Dwellings - Band C - Proportion of all overall domestic properties within Band C, 2006 CLG, 23. All Council Tax Rateable Dwellings - Band D - Proportion of all overall domestic properties within Band D, 2006 CLG, 24. All Council Tax Rateable Dwellings - Band E - Proportion of all overall domestic properties within Band E, 2006 CLG, 25. All Council Tax Rateable Dwellings - Band F+ - Proportion of all overall domestic properties within Band F and above, 2006, CLG 26. Private sector dwellings, 2006 House Condition Survey, Torbay Council (Private sector dwellings include private rented, owner occupied and Housing Association dwellings. Torbay Council has transferred all its housing stock to Riviera Housing Trust so these dwellings are included as part of the Housing Association figure) 27. Non decent Private Sector Dwellings, 2006 House Condition Survey, Torbay Council (Non decent dwellings do not meet the Government s Decent Homes Standard. The Standard s criteria is that homes must be above the legal minimum standard for housing, in a reasonable state of repair, have reasonably modern facilities and services, and provide a reasonable degree of thermal comfort. Private sector dwellings include private rented, owner occupied and Housing Association dwellings) 28. Inadequate thermal comfort - Private Sector Dwellings, 2006 House Condition Survey, Torbay Council (Dwellings with inadequate thermal comfort do not meet the thermal comfort criteria within the Government s Decent Homes Standard. Private sector dwellings include private rented, owner occupied and Housing Association dwellings) 29. Disrepair - Private Sector Dwellings, 2006 House Condition Survey, Torbay Council (Dwellings in disrepair do not meet this part of the Government s Decent Homes Standard. Private sector dwellings include private rented, owner occupied and Housing Association dwellings) 30. Vulnerable households - Private Sector Dwellings, 2006 House Condition Survey, Torbay Council (Vulnerable households are those in receipt of certain benefits. Private sector dwellings include private rented, owner occupied and Housing Association dwellings) 31. Vulnerable households in non decent dwellings - Private Sector Dwellings, 2006 House Condition Survey, Torbay Council (Vulnerable households are those in receipt of certain benefits. Non decent dwellings do not meet the Government s Decent Homes Standard. Private sector dwellings include private rented, owner occupied and Housing Association dwellings) 32. Housing waiting list Rents, lettings and tenancies: Percentage of all households on local authorities housing waiting list, 2006/07, Communities and Local Government

35 Stronger Communities Table 3 of Homeless and in priority need 34. Acceptances of homeless applications 35. Proportion of homeless acceptances made to 16 to 24 year olds 36. Net additional dwellings to stock - % affordable 37. Hospital admissions - 3 year annual average - all admissions 38. Hospital admissions - all admissions 39. Hospital admissions - 3 year annual average - all non-elective admissions 40. Hospital admissions - all non-elective admissions 41. Hospital admissions - all elective admissions 42. Hospital admissions - injuries and poisonings - all non-elective admissions 43. Hospital admissions - injuries and poisonings; poisoning by other medications and drugs - all non-elective admissions 44. Hospital admissions - injuries and poisonings; fracture of neck of femur (hip) - all non-elective admissions 45. Hospital admissions - digestive - all non-elective admissions 46. Hospital admissions - digestive, liver disease, alcohol-related - all non-elective admissions 47. Hospital admissions - digestive, disorders of teeth and jaw - all non-elective admissions 48. Hospital admissions - digestive - all elective admissions Date 2007/ / / / / / / / / / / / / / / /08 Measure Per 1,000 Households % % % Count SAR Count SAR SAR SAR SAR SAR SAR SAR SAR SAR England % 40.0% 22.2% N/A 100 N/A South West % 42.8% 15.4% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Torbay % 40.4% 19.4% 33, , Berry Head-with-Furzeham N/A N/A N/A N/A 2, , Blatchcombe N/A N/A N/A N/A 2, , Churston-with-Galmpton N/A N/A N/A N/A 1, Clifton-with-Maidenway N/A N/A N/A N/A 1, Cockington-with-Chelston N/A N/A N/A N/A 2, , Ellacombe N/A N/A N/A N/A 1, Goodrington-with-Roselands N/A N/A N/A N/A 1, Preston N/A N/A N/A N/A 2, , Roundham-with-Hyde N/A N/A N/A N/A 2, , St Marychurch N/A N/A N/A N/A 2, , St Mary s-with-summercombe N/A N/A N/A N/A 1, Shiphay-with-the-Willows N/A N/A N/A N/A 2, , Tormohun N/A N/A N/A N/A 3, , Watcombe N/A N/A N/A N/A 2, Wellswood N/A N/A N/A N/A 1, Stronger Communities notes: 33. Homeless and in priority need - homeless applications and numbers accepted as homeless, eligible, unintentional and priority need accepted as a rate per 1,000 households, 2007/08, Communities and Local Government 34. Acceptances of homeless applications- percentage of applicants accepted as homeless, eligible, unintentionally homeless and in priority need, 2007/08, Communities and Local Government. Taken from P1E quarterly returns by Local Authorities 35. Proportion of homeless acceptance decisions made to year olds, 2007/08, Communities and Local Government. Taken from P1E quarterly returns by Local Authorities 36. Net additional dwellings to stock - % affordable, 2006/07, additional affordable homes provided as a percentage of the net additional dwellings to stock, Communities and Local Government 37. Hospital admissions - 3 year annual average - All admissions, 2006/08, Dr Foster Intelligence 38. Hospital admissions - All admissions, 2006/08 SAR, Dr Foster Intelligence 39. Hospital admissions - 3 year annual average - All non-elective admissions, 2006/08, Dr Foster Intelligence 40. Hospital admissions - All non-elective admissions, 2006/08 SAR, Dr Foster Intelligence 41. Hospital admissions - All elective admissions, 2006/08 SAR, Dr Foster Intelligence 42. Hospital admissions - Injuries and Poisonings - All non-elective admissions, 2006/08 SAR, Dr Foster Intelligence 43. Hospital admissions - Injuries and Poisonings; Poisoning by other medications and drugs - All non-elective admissions, 2006/08 SAR, Dr Foster Intelligence 44. Hospital admissions - Injuries and Poisonings; Fracture of neck of femur (hip) - All non-elective admissions, 2006/08 SAR, Dr Foster Intelligence 45. Hospital admissions - Digestive - All non-elective admissions, 2006/08 SAR, Dr Foster Intelligence 46. Hospital admissions - Digestive; Liver disease, alcohol-related - All non-elective admissions, 2006/08 SAR, Dr Foster Intelligence 47. Hospital admissions - Digestive; Disorders of teeth and jaw - All non-elective admissions, 2006/08 SAR, Dr Foster Intelligence 48. Hospital admissions - Digestive - All elective admissions, 2006/08 SAR, Dr Foster Intelligence 33

36 Stronger Communities Table 4 of Hospital admissions - digestive, disorders of teeth and jaw - all elective admissions 50. Hospital admissions - mental health - all non-elective admissions 51. Hospital admissions - mental health, alcohol-related mental disorders - all non-elective admissions 52. Hospital admissions - pregnancy conditions - all elective admissions 53. Hospital admissions - respiratory - all admissions 54. Hospital admissions - circulatory - all admissions 55. Hospital admissions - neoplasm s - all admissions 56. Hospital admissions - neoplasm s, cancer of bronchus, lung - all admissions 57. Hospital admissions - neoplasm s, cancer of breast - all admissions 58. Hospital admissions - musculoskeletal - all admissions 59. Alcohol related hospital admissions 60. Maternity - proportion initiating breastfeeding 61. Maternity - proportion smoking at time of delivery 62. Maternity - proportion breastfeeding or mixed feeding at 6 to 8 weeks 63. Teenage conception rate 64. Teenage conceptions change on 1998 base year To 2007 Date 2006/ / / / / / / / / / / / / / Measure SAR SAR SAR SAR SAR SAR SAR SAR SAR SAR Per 100,000 population % % % 6 Per 1,000 females aged 15 to 17 England , % 14.4% N/A % South West N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 1, % 14.1% N/A % Torbay , % 21.8% 34.4% % Berry Head-with-Furzeham N/A 69.0% 22.4% 52.7% N/A N/A Blatchcombe N/A 69.2% 23.7% 26.2% N/A N/A Churston-with-Galmpton N/A 90.3% 9.4% 53.8% N/A N/A Clifton-with-Maidenway N/A 71.0% 18.8% 35.6% N/A N/A Cockington-with-Chelston N/A 80.0% 11.8% 39.8% N/A N/A Ellacombe N/A 66.7% 30.6% 28.4% N/A N/A Goodrington-with-Roselands N/A 72.9% 10.4% 47.7% N/A N/A Preston N/A 87.1% 19.1% 38.8% N/A N/A Roundham-with-Hyde N/A 75.0% 26.5% 34.4% N/A N/A St Marychurch N/A 77.9% 17.1% 34.1% N/A N/A St Mary s-with-summercombe N/A 75.4% 28.4% 50.0% N/A N/A Shiphay-with-the-Willows N/A 73.1% 14.2% 39.1% N/A N/A Tormohun N/A 70.3% 32.6% 28.4% N/A N/A Watcombe N/A 60.4% 34.0% 28.6% N/A N/A Wellswood N/A 80.9% 8.5% 42.2% N/A N/A % 34 Stronger Communities notes: 6 Indicates that the significance has been derived from the Torbay average and NOT the national average 49. Hospital admissions - Digestive; Disorders of teeth and jaw - All elective admissions, 2006/08 SAR, Dr Foster Intelligence 50. Hospital admissions - Mental Health - All non-elective admissions, 2006/08 SAR, Dr Foster Intelligence 51. Hospital admissions - Mental Health; Alcohol-related mental disorders - All non-elective admissions, 2006/08 SAR, Dr Foster Intelligence 52. Hospital admissions - Pregnancy Conditions - All elective admissions, 2006/08 SAR, Dr Foster Intelligence 53. Hospital admissions - Respiratory - All admissions, 2006/08 SAR, Dr Foster Intelligence 54. Hospital admissions - Circulatory - All admissions, 2006/08 SAR, Dr Foster Intelligence 55. Hospital admissions - Neoplasm s - All admissions, 2006/08 SAR, Dr Foster Intelligence 56. Hospital admissions - Neoplasm s; Cancer of bronchus, lung - All admissions, 2006/08 SAR, Dr Foster Intelligence 57. Hospital admissions - Neoplasm s; Cancer of breast - All admissions, 2006/08 SAR, Dr Foster Intelligence 58. Hospital admissions - Musculoskeletal - All admissions, 2006/08 SAR, Dr Foster Intelligence 59. Alcohol Related Hospital Admissions age-standardised rate of hospital admissions (NI39), per 100,000 population, persons admitted to hospital where the diagnosis field includes one of the conditions which are specific to alcohol misuse, Annual totals for 2006/07, APHO 60. Maternity - Proportion initiating breastfeeding; proportion of all deliveries where breastfeeding was initiated at birth, 2007/08, TCT, DH 61. Maternity - Proportion smoking at time of delivery; proportion of all deliveries where mother was a smoker at birth, 2007/08, TCT, DH 62. Maternity - Proportion breastfeeding or breastfeeding and bottle feeding at 6 to 8 week developmental check. (Q1, Q2 & Q3) 2008/09 TCT 63. Teenage Conception Rate, 2007 ONS 64. Teenage Conceptions Change on 1998 base year to 2007, ONS

37 Stronger Communities Table 5 of Teenage conceptions 66. Physically active adults 67. Obese adults 68. Drug misuse 69. Binge drinking Smoking prevalence 71. Healthy eating 72. Road deaths and injuries 73. Cancer deaths in under 75s 74. Circulatory disease deaths 75. Suicides and undetermined injuries 76. Accidental deaths 77. Estimated tobacco attributable premature mortality (ages 35 to 69 years) 78. Infant mortality 79. Mortality from stroke 80. Prevalence of hypertension (males 16+) Date 2001/ / / / / / / / / / / / / / Measure Per 1,000 females aged 15 to 17 % % Per 1,000 aged 15 to 64 % % % England % 23.6% % 24.1% 26.3% N/A % South West % 23.2% % 21.5% 25.9% % Torbay % 23.5% % 21.7% 25.3% N/A % Berry Head-with-Furzeham 31.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A * N/A N/A N/A Blatchcombe 49.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A * * N/A N/A N/A Churston-with-Galmpton 23.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A * * 86.3 N/A N/A N/A Clifton-with-Maidenway 33.1 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A * * 67.1 N/A N/A N/A Cockington-with-Chelston 35.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A * N/A N/A N/A Ellacombe 63.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A * N/A N/A N/A Goodrington-with-Roselands 38.2 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A * * N/A N/A N/A Preston 42.8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Roundham-with-Hyde 76.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A St Marychurch 46.2 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A St Mary s-with-summercombe 38.5 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A * N/A N/A N/A Shiphay-with-the-Willows 57.2 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A * N/A N/A N/A Tormohun 77.3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Watcombe 66.6 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A * N/A N/A N/A Wellswood 38.1 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A * N/A N/A N/A Per 100,000 population Per 100,00 aged <75 Per 100,00 aged <75 Per 100,000 Per 100,000 SMR Per 1,000 live births Per 100,000 % Stronger Communities notes: * Not published due to small figures 65. Teenage conceptions at ward level /02 to 2004/06 aggregated average, ONS, 66. Physically Active Adults - Percentage of adults (16+) who reported participating in moderate intensity sport or recreational activities for 30 minutes or more on 20 or more days in the previous four weeks, in the Active People Survey 2006, APHO 67. Obese Adults, Percentage of persons aged 16+ who are estimated to be obese based on the Health Survey for England , APHO 68. Drug Misuse - estimate of resident persons aged believed to be problem drug users in per 1,000 residents aged years APHO 69. Binge Drinking - Proportion of adult men who drank 8 or more units of alcohol on the heaviest drinking day in the previous seven days at time of survey and adult women who drank 6 or more units of alcohol on the heaviest drinking day in the previous seven days at time of survey, 2003/ Smoking Prevalence, modelled on number of persons aged 16+ who are self-reported smokers in a sample survey of the population of England , ONS 71. Healthy Eating, Modelled on Proportion of adults who reported consumption of 5 or more portions of fruit and vegetables, 2003/05, APHO 72. Road Deaths and Injuries, people killed or seriously injured on the road, rate per 100,000 population 2003/05, APHO 73. Cancer deaths <75 years DASR per 100,000 (based on data), APHO 74. Circulatory Disease deaths <75 years DASR per 100,000 (based on data) APHO 75. Suicides and undetermined injuries all ages DASR per 100,000 (based on data) NCHOD, Torbay Care Trust 76. Accidents - Accidental deaths all ages DASR per 100,000 (based on data) 77. Estimated tobacco attributable premature mortality (ages 35 to 69 years) SMR, 2003/2005, SWPHO 78. Infant mortality, number of premature deaths per 1,000 live births, 2004/06 NCHOD 79. Mortality from stroke - DSR per 100, /07, NCHOD 80. Prevalence of hypertension (males 16+) , These estimates and projections of the prevalence of hypertension in people aged 16+ have been calculated using a model developed at the Dept of Primary Care and Social Medicine, Imperial College, London 35

38 Stronger Communities Table 6 of Prevalence of hypertension (females 16+) 82. Prevalence of hypertension (persons 16+) 83. Estimating the prevalence of common mental health problems - any neurotic disorder 84. Estimating the prevalence of common mental health problems - all phobias 85. Estimating the prevalence of common mental health problems - depressive episode 86. Estimating the prevalence of common mental health problems - generalised anxiety disorder 87. Estimating the prevalence of common mental health problems - mixed anxiety depression 88. Estimating the prevalence of common mental health problems - obsessive compulsive disorder 89. Estimating the prevalence of common mental health problems - panic disorder 90. Diabetes prevalence 91. Male aged proportion with dementia 92. Female aged proportion with dementia 93. Total aged proportion with dementia 94. Male aged proportion with dementia 95. Female aged proportion with dementia 96. Total aged proportion with dementia Date Measure % % Per 1,000 population Per 1,000 population Per 1,000 population Per 1,000 population Per 1,000 population Per 1,000 population Per 1,000 population % % % % % % % England 29.3% 30.2% % 0.8% 1.5% 1.1% 5.3% 8.1% 6.9% South West 31.6% 32.1% % 0.7% 1.3% 1.0% 5.5% 8.7% 7.3% Torbay 36.4% 36.5% % 1.3% 2.8% 2.1% 6.4% 10.9% 9.0% Berry Head-with-Furzeham N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 6.5% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Blatchcombe N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 4.5% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Churston-with-Galmpton N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 6.9% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Clifton-with-Maidenway N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 5.5% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Cockington-with-Chelston N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 4.9% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Ellacombe N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 4.4% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Goodrington-with-Roselands N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 5.5% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Preston N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 6.2% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Roundham-with-Hyde N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 6.7% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A St Marychurch N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 6.1% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A St Mary s-with-summercombe N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 5.8% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Shiphay-with-the-Willows N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 4.1% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Tormohun N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 4.9% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Watcombe N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 5.2% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Wellswood N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 7.5% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 36 Stronger Communities notes: 81. Prevalence of hypertension (females 16+) , These estimates and projections of the prevalence of hypertension in people aged 16+ have been calculated using a model developed at the Dept of Primary Care and Social Medicine, Imperial College, London 82. Prevalence of hypertension (persons 16+) , These estimates and projections of the prevalence of hypertension in people aged 16+ have been calculated using a model developed at the Dept of Primary Care and Social Medicine, Imperial College, London 83. Estimating the prevalence of common mental health problems - Any neurotic disorder, Rates per 1,000 population, 2006, NEPHO 84. Estimating the prevalence of common mental health problems - All phobias, Rates per 1,000 population, 2006, NEPHO 85. Estimating the prevalence of common mental health problems - Depressive episode, Rates per 1,000 population, 2006, NEPHO 86. Estimating the prevalence of common mental health problems - Generalised anxiety disorder, Rates per 1,000 population, 2006, NEPHO 87. Estimating the prevalence of common mental health problems - Mixed anxiety depression, Rates per 1,000 population, 2006, NEPHO 88. Estimating the prevalence of common mental health problems - Obsessive compulsive disorder, Rates per 1,000 population, 2006, NEPHO 89. Estimating the prevalence of common mental health problems - Panic disorder, Rates per 1,000 population, 2006, NEPHO 90. Diabetes Prevalence, Estimated number and prevalence of Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes in total population (diagnosed + undiagnosed), 2005, YHPHO 91. Male - estimated proportion of total male population aged 30+ with dementia, 2007, Alzheimer s Society 92. Female - estimated proportion of total female population aged 30+ with dementia, 2007, Alzheimer s Society 93. Total - estimated proportion of total population aged 30+ with dementia, 2007, Alzheimer s Society 94. Male - estimated proportion with dementia - proportion of total male population aged 65+ with dementia, 2007, NEPHO 95. Female - estimated proportion with dementia - proportion of total female population aged 65+ with dementia, 2007, NEPHO 96. Total - estimated proportion with dementia - proportion of total population aged 65+ with dementia, 2007, NEPHO

39 Stronger Communities Table 7 of Projected levels of total dementia in over 65s in Public perception of - teenagers hanging around on the streets 99. Public perception of - people being drunk or rowdy in public spaces 100. Public perception of - vandalism, graffiti and other deliberate damage to property or vehicles 101. Public perception of - people using or dealing drugs 102. Noise complaints 103. Recorded crime - violence against the person 104. Recorded crime - robbery 105. Recorded crime - burglary dwelling 106. Recorded crime - burglary dwelling 107. Recorded crime - theft of a motor vehicle 108. Theft from a vehicle 109. Recorded crime BCS comparator 110. Annual change - violence against the person 111. Annual change - robbery offences 112. Annual change - burglary dwelling Date / / / / / / / /08 06/07-07/08 06/07-07/08 06/07-07/08 Measure % % % % % Per 10,000 population Per 1,000 population Per 1,000 population Per 1,000 population Per 1,000 Households Per 1,000 population Per 1,000 population Per 1,000 population % % % England 7.1% 56.7% 30.6% 38.5% 43.0% N/A % -16.0% -4.4% South West 7.6% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A % -7.2% 2.9% Torbay 9.0% 60.0% 50.0% 45.0% 64.0% % -21.5% -25.7% Berry Head-with-Furzeham N/A 50.5% 38.4% 39.6% 49.1% % N/A -58.6% Blatchcombe N/A 63.2% 38.1% 47.0% 46.5% % N/A 12.5% Churston-with-Galmpton N/A 46.3% 36.6% 37.3% 39.0% % N/A 40.0% Clifton-with-Maidenway N/A 61.9% 52.4% 56.9% 57.4% % N/A -33.3% Cockington-with-Chelston N/A 53.2% 45.2% 45.7% 51.8% % N/A 3.0% Ellacombe N/A 72.1% 54.4% 58.3% 57.1% % N/A -6.3% Goodrington-with-Roselands N/A 46.6% 42.5% 41.3% 43.2% % N/A -35.7% Preston N/A 59.1% 48.4% 43.7% 63.5% % N/A -8.0% Roundham-with-Hyde N/A 59.7% 54.4% 60.0% 48.1% % N/A -18.2% St Marychurch N/A 56.8% 55.9% 50.0% 58.3% % N/A -34.5% St Mary s-with-summercombe N/A 57.3% 44.0% 41.1% 57.3% % N/A -6.3% Shiphay-with-the-Willows N/A 57.6% 46.3% 40.2% 58.2% % N/A -61.3% Tormohun N/A 75.2% 64.8% 53.7% 72.7% % N/A -21.9% Watcombe N/A 65.5% 46.2% 50.0% 52.4% % N/A -31.7% Wellswood N/A 51.0% 56.8% 44.1% 53.7% % N/A -45.9% Stronger Communities notes: 97. Projected levels of total dementia in 2013 estimated proportion of total population aged 65+ with dementia, 2007, NEPHO 98. Public perception of how much of a problem residents think that teenagers hanging around on the streets - is a very or fairly big problem General User Satisfaction Survey, Audit Commission and Torbay Council (un-weighted ward level analysis against the England mean) Audit Commission 99. Public perception of how much of a problem residents think that people being drunk or rowdy in public spaces - is a very or fairly big problem General User Satisfaction Survey, Audit Commission and Torbay Council (un-weighted ward level analysis against the England mean) Audit Commission 100. Public perception of how much of a problem residents think that vandalism, graffiti and other deliberate damage to property or vehicles - is a very or fairly big problem General User Satisfaction Survey, Audit Commission and Torbay Council (un-weighted ward level analysis against the England mean) Audit Commission 101. Public perception of how much of a problem residents think that people using or dealing drugs - is a very or fairly big problem General User Satisfaction Survey, Audit Commission and Torbay Council (un-weighted ward level analysis against the England mean) Audit Commision 102. Noise complaints - Number of Noise Nuisance service requests per 10,000 population recorded by Torbay Council s Environmental Protection team between 1st April 2007 and 31st March 2008 using Civica Authority Public Protection 103. Recorded Crime - Violence against the person offences per 1,000 population 07/08, Devon and Cornwall Constabulary, Home Office 104. Recorded Crime - Robbery offences per 1,000 population 07/08, Devon and Cornwall Constabulary, Home Office 105. Recorded Crime - Burglary dwelling offences per 1,000 population 07/08, Devon and Cornwall Constabulary, Home Office 106. Recorded Crime - Burglary dwelling offences per 1,000 households 07/08, Devon and Cornwall Constabulary, Home Office 107. Recorded Crime - Theft of a motor vehicle offences per 1,000 population 07/08, Devon and Cornwall Constabulary, Home Office 108. Theft from a vehicle offences per 1,000 population 07/08, Devon and Cornwall Constabulary, Home Office 109. Recorded crime BCS comparator offences per 1,000 population 07/08, Devon and Cornwall Constabulary, Home Office 110. Annual change - Violence against the person change 06/07-07/08 (%), Devon and Cornwall Constabulary, Home Office 111. Annual change - Robbery offences change 06/07-07/08 (%), Devon and Cornwall Constabulary, Home Office 112. Annual change - Burglary dwelling change 06/07-07/08 (%), Devon and Cornwall Constabulary, Home Office 37

40 Stronger Communities Table 8 of Annual change - theft of a motor vehicle 114. Annual change - theft from a vehicle 115. Number of adult offenders 116. Offenders with difficulties coping 117. Offenders with alcohol use problems 118. Offenders where drugs have ever misused 119. Offenders with accommodation problems 120. Offenders unemployed 121. Offenders with psychological problems 122. Offenders contemplating self-harm 123. Total fire service incidents 124. Public perception of - satisfaction with participation in local decision-making 125. Rank of health and disability deprivation domain 126. Rank of barriers to housing and services deprivation domain 127. Rank of crime and disorder deprivation domain 128. Rank of living environment deprivation domain Date 06/07-07/08 06/07-07/ Measure % % Per 100,000 % 6 % 6 % 6 % 6 % 6 % 6 % 6 Per 10,000 population % u Rank Rank Rank Rank England -11.8% -14.0% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A % N/A N/A N/A N/A South West -10.3% -11.2% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Torbay -2.4% -35.3% % 46.3% 60.4% 37.0% 43.0% 44.0% 28.6% % N/A N/A N/A N/A Berry Head-with-Furzeham N/A 0.0% % 48.1% 70.4% 44.4% 48.1% 48.1% 37.0% % 20+% to 30% 50+% to 60% 50+% to 60% 10+% to 20% Blatchcombe N/A -48.1% % 29.5% 40.9% 29.5% 31.8% 38.6% 22.7% % 20+% to 30% 30+% to 40% 40+% to 50% 20+% to 30% Churston-with-Galmpton N/A -35.0% % 57.1% 28.6% 28.6% 14.3% 28.6% 14.3% % 30+% to 40% 50+% to 60% 70+% to % to 80% Clifton-with-Maidenway N/A -75.8% % 45.5% 54.5% 18.2% 18.2% 27.3% * % 20+% to 30% 40+% to 50% 30+% to 40% 10+% to 20% Cockington-with-Chelston N/A -3.6% % 48.3% 65.5% 37.9% 27.6% 51.7% 41.4% % 30+% to 40% 60+% to 70% 30+% to 40% 10+% to 20% Ellacombe N/A -37.9% % 40.0% 62.2% 40.0% 46.7% 53.3% 33.3% % 10+% to 20% 40+% to 50% 10+% to 20% Top 10% Goodrington-with-Roselands N/A -73.6% % 41.7% 41.7% 25.0% 58.3% 41.7% 41.7% % 30+% to 40% 30+% to 40% 50+% to 60% 30+% to 40% Preston N/A -38.7% % 46.2% 69.2% 30.8% 30.8% 38.5% 15.4% % 20+% to 30% 40+% to 50% 50+% to 60% 30+% to 40% Roundham-with-Hyde N/A -70.4% % 55.9% 64.4% 42.4% 39.0% 50.8% 39.0% % Top 10% 40+% to 50% 10+% to 20% Top 10% St Marychurch N/A 2.9% % 38.9% 58.3% 27.8% 33.3% 38.9% 16.7% % 20+% to 30% 50+% to 60% 10+% to 20% 10+% to 20% St Mary s-with-summercombe N/A -33.3% % 69.6% 60.9% 21.7% 26.1% 47.8% 26.1% % 20+% to 30% 50+% to 60% 50+% to 60% 20+% to 30% Shiphay-with-the-Willows N/A 21.2% % 40.0% 56.0% 24.0% 44.0% 16.0% 16.0% % 30+% to 40% 50+% to 60% 60+% to 70% 40+% to 50% Tormohun N/A -20.1% 1, % 47.8% 62.7% 43.3% 50.0% 44.8% 32.1% % Top 10% 30+% to 40% Top 10% Top 10% Watcombe N/A 10.0% % 52.4% 73.8% 54.8% 69.1% 45.2% 23.8% % 10+% to 20% 40+% to 50% 20+% to 30% 20+% to 30% Wellswood N/A -9.5% % 38.5% 50.0% 23.1% 50.0% 50.0% 26.9% % 20+% to 30% 10+% to 20% 10+% to 20% 20+% to 30% 38 Stronger Communities notes: * Not published due to small figures u indicates where a judgement on the colouring has been made indicates where data has been modelled from MLSOA to electoral ward 6 Indicates that the significance has been derived from the Torbay average and NOT the national average 113. Annual change - Theft of a motor vehicle change 06/07-07/08 (%), Devon and Cornwall Constabulary, Home Office 114. Annual change - Theft from a vehicle change 06/07-07/08 (%), Devon and Cornwall Constabulary, Home Office 115. Number of Adult Offenders per 100,000 resident population aged 18+, 2008 Devon and Cornwall Probation Service 116. Offenders with difficulties coping - Proportion of offenders with Some or Significant Problems coping, 2008, Devon and Cornwall Probation Service 117. Offenders with alcohol use problems - Proportion of probation clients where alcohol use is a problem, 2008, Devon and Cornwall Probation Service 118. Offenders where drugs have ever misused - Proportion of clients where drugs have ever been used, 2008, Devon and Cornwall Probation Service 119. Offenders with accommodation problems - proportion of offenders with some or significant problems in accommodation suitability, 2008, Devon and Cornwall Probation Service 120. Offenders unemployed - proportion of offenders who are unemployed, 2008, Devon and Cornwall Probation Service 121. Offenders with psychological problems - proportion of offenders with some or significant psychological problems, 2008, Devon and Cornwall Probation Service 122. Offenders contemplating self harm - proportion of offenders with reporting Self harm, attempted suicide or suicidal thoughts/feelings, 2008, Devon and Cornwall Probation Service 123. Total Fire Service Incidents, Per 10,000 residents, 2005, ONS 124. Public perception of - Satisfaction with participation in local decision-making, 2006 General User Satisfaction Survey, Audit Commission and Torbay Council (un-weighted ward level analysis against the England mean) Audit Commission 125. Rank of Health and Disability Deprivation Domain - Ranking of average SOA score per ward for Health and Disability Deprivation Domain, Rank of Barriers to Housing and Services Deprivation Domain - Ranking of average SOA score per ward for Barriers to Housing and Services Deprivation Domain, Rank of Crime and Disorder Deprivation Domain - Ranking of average SOA score per ward for Crime and Disorder Deprivation Domain, Rank of Living Environment Deprivation Domain - Ranking of average SOA score per ward for Living Environment Deprivation Domain, 2007

41 Younger People This section on Younger People is in addition to the Community Plan themes and has been included to give an overview of the challenges and issues for younger people in the Bay. Improving the outcomes for all children and families underpins our overall aim to improve the Bay s economic prosperity. Our key findings Torbay s demographic base has a significantly lower proportion of young people; this proportion is projected to decrease slightly over the next five years despite a slight increase in overall numbers. In 2001, around 12% of dependent children in Torbay lived within a household without central heating. This is significantly higher than the national average. Over a quarter of all dependent children in the Bay lived in a lone-parent family (2001); this figure was highest in Tormohun with over a third of dependent children living in a lone-parent family. The rate of children looked after per 10,000 is significantly higher in Torbay, at 67 per 10,000, compared to the national 54 per 10,000. Fewer children per 10,000 became subject to a child protection plan in the Bay compared to the national average. Whilst we have identified indicators relating to the younger people section, we fully acknowledge that there are limitations and gaps due to the data that is available. Some examples of the limitations and future developments for the Younger People data set Data from the 2001 census will not be updated until the 2011 census. More detailed data on participation in positive activities. Employment patterns of younger people. Increase data at ward level. Youth re-offending. Data on extended services provision. In addition to the Community Plan themes, the JSNA has incorporated three sections to highlight different inequalities and challenges for different sub-sets of the population - Younger People, Older People and Vulnerable People. 39

42 Younger People Table 1 of 5 1. Population aged 0 to Proportion of total population aged 0 to Projected population aged 0 to 19 in Projected total population aged 0 to 19 in All dependent children 6. Dependent children living in overcrowded household 7. Dependent children living without central heating 8. Dependent children with no cars or vans in household 9. Dependent children living - owner occupied 10. Dependent children living - social rented 11. Dependent children living - private rented 12. Dependent children living - lone parent family 13. Dependent children living - married couple family 14. Dependent children living - cohabiting couple family 15. Dependent children living - not in a family Date Measure Count % Count % Count % % % % % % % % % % England 12,341, % 12,482, % 11,006, % 5.9% 16.4% 67.3% 22.9% 8.0% 22.8% 65.2% 10.9% 1.1% South West 1,190, % 1,203, % 1,038, % 7.2% 9.9% 70.6% 18.0% 9.7% 20.1% 67.8% 11.2% 0.8% Torbay 29, % 29, % 26, % 12.0% 15.2% 68.2% 13.5% 17.5% 26.6% 60.1% 12.2% 1.1% Berry Head-with-Furzeham 1, % N/A N/A 1, % 14.9% 15.8% 68.0% 5.0% 26.4% 25.3% 61.7% 11.9% 1.2% Blatchcombe 3, % N/A N/A 2, % 11.1% 16.1% 55.5% 33.8% 9.9% 28.4% 55.6% 14.6% 1.4% Churston-with-Galmpton 1, % N/A N/A 1, % 4.4% 3.1% 80.9% 10.5% 6.8% 15.4% 76.1% 7.4% 0.9% Clifton-with-Maidenway 1, % N/A N/A 1, % 12.8% 10.8% 77.4% 7.2% 15.4% 25.3% 60.0% 14.4% 0.7% Cockington-with-Chelston 2, % N/A N/A 2, % 14.9% 11.5% 74.8% 7.5% 17.3% 24.6% 64.4% 10.0% 1.0% Ellacombe 1, % N/A N/A 1, % 17.5% 19.8% 68.8% 5.3% 25.5% 32.7% 52.4% 13.8% 0.9% Goodrington-with-Roselands 1, % N/A N/A 1, % 8.0% 8.8% 83.7% 2.9% 12.2% 20.0% 70.5% 9.5% 0.2% Preston 2, % N/A N/A 1, % 6.7% 7.8% 81.9% 4.3% 12.4% 20.0% 70.7% 8.1% 1.0% Roundham-with-Hyde 1, % N/A N/A 1, % 18.7% 22.1% 58.8% 10.4% 30.6% 31.7% 54.3% 12.1% 2.1% St Marychurch 2, % N/A N/A 2, % 10.5% 16.1% 71.4% 7.6% 19.6% 26.3% 59.6% 12.4% 1.5% St Mary s-with-summercombe 1, % N/A N/A 1, % 15.4% 14.3% 68.9% 15.9% 14.2% 24.7% 60.2% 14.1% 1.1% Shiphay-with-the-Willows 2, % N/A N/A 1, % 7.4% 9.7% 69.4% 16.5% 13.3% 23.3% 63.9% 12.2% 0.7% Tormohun 2, % N/A N/A 2, % 13.7% 26.6% 56.3% 17.0% 25.5% 36.2% 47.3% 14.7% 1.6% Watcombe 1, % N/A N/A 1, % 13.7% 24.0% 53.0% 36.7% 9.8% 31.4% 52.8% 14.7% 0.9% Wellswood % N/A N/A % 5.7% 14.8% 64.4% 2.3% 32.3% 27.8% 61.6% 9.4% 0.7% 40 Younger People notes: 1. Population aged 0 to Mid Year Estimate, ONS 2. Proportion of total population aged 0 to Mid Year Estimate, ONS 3. Projected population aged 0 to 19 in based, 2008 Sub National Population Projections, ONS 4. Projected total population aged 0 to 19 in based, 2008 Sub National Population Projections, ONS 5. All Dependent children, a dependent child is a person aged 0 to 15 in a household (whether or not in a family) or aged 16 to 18 in full-time education and living in a family with his or her parent(s) 2001 Census, ONS 6. Dependent children living in overcrowded household, 2001 Census, ONS 7. Dependent children living without central heating, 2001 Census, ONS 8. Dependent children with No cars or vans in household, 2001 Census, ONS 9. Dependent children living - Owner Occupied, 2001 Census, ONS 10. Dependent children living - Social rented, 2001 Census, ONS 11. Dependent children living - Private rented, 2001 Census, ONS 12. Dependent children living - Lone parent family, 2001 Census, ONS 13. Dependent children living - Married couple family, 2001 Census, ONS 14. Dependent children living - Cohabiting couple family, 2001 Census, ONS 15. Dependent children living - Not in a family, 2001 Census, ONS

43 Younger People Table 2 of Dependent children - language needs indicator 17. Dependent children living - not good health 18. Dependent children with - a limiting long-term illness 19. Dependent children - providing unpaid care (any hours) 20. Dependent children - number of adults in employment in household - none 21. Dependent children - number of adults in employment in household Dependent children - number of adults in employment in household - 2 or more 23. Dependent children - adults in higher managerial and professional occupations 24. Dependent children - adults in lower managerial and professional occupations 25. Dependent children - adults in intermediate occupations 26. Dependent children - adults in small employers and own account workers 27. Dependent children - adults in lower supervisory and technical occupations 28. Dependent children - adults in semi-routine occupations 29. Dependent children - adults in routine occupations 30. Dependent children - adults never worked or long term unemployed Date Measure % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % England 13.6% 1.2% 4.3% 1.3% 17.4% 32.7% 49.9% 14.3% 22.5% 6.7% 11.6% 10.5% 11.6% 11.1% 4.7% South West 6.2% 1.1% 4.2% 1.1% 13.1% 32.7% 54.3% 14.2% 24.3% 6.3% 14.0% 11.5% 11.3% 10.7% 2.3% Torbay 4.5% 1.5% 5.1% 1.2% 18.8% 34.5% 46.7% 8.3% 21.4% 6.5% 15.4% 10.9% 14.1% 12.1% 2.8% Berry Head-with-Furzeham 4.9% 1.8% 4.9% 1.4% 16.6% 38.0% 45.4% 6.9% 22.8% 5.9% 18.4% 11.3% 13.6% 12.0% 1.6% Blatchcombe 3.3% 1.4% 5.5% 1.2% 21.1% 40.1% 38.8% 7.6% 20.1% 5.0% 10.6% 11.0% 19.3% 14.2% 3.3% Churston-with-Galmpton 3.9% 1.6% 5.3% 1.7% 10.1% 30.8% 59.1% 19.2% 30.4% 4.6% 18.0% 7.9% 8.1% 6.3% 1.5% Clifton-with-Maidenway 3.7% 1.5% 4.6% 1.4% 16.0% 34.2% 49.8% 6.1% 20.6% 7.3% 17.3% 12.6% 13.6% 12.8% 1.7% Cockington-with-Chelston 5.3% 1.5% 5.1% 1.1% 14.8% 34.7% 50.5% 8.6% 24.2% 7.7% 16.3% 10.3% 13.2% 11.0% 1.8% Ellacombe 4.0% 1.2% 4.6% 1.4% 22.2% 34.2% 43.6% 4.8% 20.8% 7.3% 15.2% 10.4% 15.2% 12.5% 3.7% Goodrington-with-Roselands 4.0% 1.6% 3.8% 1.9% 12.0% 30.4% 57.6% 8.9% 25.0% 9.1% 14.0% 11.2% 11.9% 12.6% 1.5% Preston 4.2% 1.1% 4.6% 0.9% 14.5% 30.5% 55.0% 12.3% 28.0% 7.9% 18.8% 8.0% 10.1% 6.9% 0.9% Roundham-with-Hyde 4.7% 1.2% 5.0% 0.4% 19.5% 38.2% 42.3% 4.8% 16.5% 7.2% 16.2% 11.6% 20.9% 10.9% 3.4% St Marychurch 4.8% 1.4% 5.1% 1.4% 18.3% 33.3% 48.4% 7.8% 21.0% 6.4% 16.9% 11.1% 15.1% 11.1% 2.3% St Mary s-with-summercombe 3.4% 2.0% 6.1% 1.1% 18.9% 37.2% 43.9% 8.5% 17.9% 5.4% 17.5% 11.7% 12.4% 13.4% 3.4% Shiphay-with-the-Willows 5.4% 1.5% 4.0% 0.9% 15.8% 31.0% 53.3% 11.1% 23.3% 8.3% 14.1% 10.1% 11.5% 13.4% 2.8% Tormohun 6.0% 1.2% 5.9% 1.1% 28.0% 32.4% 39.6% 5.3% 17.3% 4.9% 13.9% 12.2% 16.4% 14.1% 5.2% Watcombe 3.5% 2.0% 6.4% 1.5% 27.3% 34.8% 37.9% 3.9% 14.6% 6.6% 10.1% 13.7% 16.0% 17.1% 4.6% Wellswood 7.3% 1.1% 3.7% 1.6% 21.4% 35.9% 42.6% 17.9% 21.0% 3.3% 20.9% 8.0% 9.1% 7.4% 3.0% Younger People notes: 16. Dependent children - Language needs indicator - Either born outside the UK, Isle of Man and Channel Islands, and whose Household Reference Person was born outside the Irish Republic, the USA or the Old Commonwealth or who were born inside the UK, Isle of Man and Channel Islands, and whose Household Reference Person was born outside the UK, the Irish Republic, the USA,or the Old Commonwealth Census, ONS 17. Dependent children living - Not good health, 2001 Census, ONS 18. Dependent children with - a limiting long-term illness, 2001 Census, ONS 19. Dependent children providing unpaid care (any hours), 2001 Census, ONS 20. Dependent children - Number of adults in employment in household - none, 2001 Census, ONS 21. Dependent children - Number of adults in employment in household - 1, 2001 Census, ONS 22. Dependent children - Number of adults in employment in household - 2 or more, 2001 Census, ONS 23. Dependent children - Adults in Higher managerial and professional occupations, 2001 Census, ONS 24. Dependent children - Adults in Lower managerial and professional occupations, 2001 Census, ONS 25. Dependent children - Adults in Intermediate occupations, 2001 Census, ONS 26. Dependent children - Adults in Small employers and own account workers, 2001 Census, ONS 27. Dependent children - Adults in Lower supervisory and technical occupations, 2001 Census, ONS 28. Dependent children - Adults in Semi-routine occupations, 2001 Census, ONS 29. Dependent children - Adults in Routine occupations, 2001 Census, ONS 30. Dependent children - Adults never worked or long term unemployed, 2001 Census, ONS 41

44 Younger People Table 3 of All families in households 32. Proportion of families with dependent children 33. Total number of families claiming child benefit 34. Families claiming child benefit with - one child 35. Families claiming child benefit with - two children 36. Families claiming child benefit with - three or more children 37. CLA rate per 10,000 children 38. CLA who started to be looked after (average for England and South West) 39. CLA who ceased to be looked after (average for England and South West) 40. Placement stability of CLA (% with 3 or more placements) 41. Long-term stability of CLA 42. Repeat referrals 43. Initial assessments completed on time 44. Core assessments completed on time 45. Children subject to a S47 enquiry which started in the year Date Measure Count % Count % % % Per 10,000 Count Count % % Per 10,000 % % Per 10,000 England 13,846, % 6,168, % 39.5% 16.8% % 65.7% % 80.0% 70 South West 1,425, % 581, % 41.3% 16.4% % 66.0% % 78.0% 61 Torbay 37, % 14, % 37.7% 16.4% % 64.7% % 63.0% 52 Berry Head-with-Furzeham 3, % % 37.9% 15.8% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Blatchcombe 3, % 1, % 36.8% 20.1% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Churston-with-Galmpton 2, % % 43.1% 15.5% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Clifton-with-Maidenway 2, % % 36.2% 17.8% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Cockington-with-Chelston 3, % 1, % 38.7% 17.2% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Ellacombe 2, % % 38.6% 13.7% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Goodrington-with-Roselands 2, % % 43.0% 16.5% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Preston 3, % 1, % 42.1% 15.9% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Roundham-with-Hyde 1, % % 31.9% 16.8% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A St Marychurch 3, % 1, % 35.5% 16.1% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A St Mary s-with-summercombe 2, % % 39.9% 17.8% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Shiphay-with-the-Willows 2, % 1, % 39.6% 12.8% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Tormohun 2, % 1, % 33.5% 14.0% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Watcombe 2, % % 37.4% 22.1% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Wellswood 2, % % 33.0% 13.2% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 42 Younger People notes: 31. All Families in Households, 2001 Census, ONS 32. Proportion of families with Dependent Children, 2001 Census, ONS 33. Total Number of Families Claiming Benefit, 2006, ONS 34. Families claiming child benefit with - One Child, 2006, ONS 35. Families claiming child benefit with - Two Children, 2006, ONS 36. Families claiming child benefit with - Three or More Children, 2006, ONS 37. Children looked after at 31 March, rate per 10,000 children aged under 18 years, SSDA903 Return 2007/08, DCSF 38. Children who started to be looked after during the year ending 31 March, (Average for England and South West), SSDA903 Return 2007/08, DCSF 39. Children who ceased to be looked after during the year ending 31 March,, SSDA903 Return 2007/08, DCSF 40. NI 62 - Percentage of children looked after at 31 March with three or more placements during the year ending 31 March, SSDA903 Return 2007/08, DCSF 41. NI 63: Long term stability of Children Looked After, SSDA903 Return 2007/08, DCSF 42. Referrals within 12 months of a previous referral, CPR3 Return 2007/08, DCSF 43. NI 59: Initial Assessments completed within 7 working days of referral, CPR3 Return 2007/08, DCSF 44. NI 60: Core Assessments completed within 35 working days, CPR3 Return 2007/08, DCSF 45. All children who were subject to Section 47 (S.47) enquiries which started in the year, CPR3 Return 2007/08, DCSF

45 Younger People Table 4 of Children subject to an initial stage CP conference 47. Initial CP conferences within 15 days of S47 enquiries 48. Children who became subject to a CP plan 49. Children subject to a repeat CP plan 50. Children ceased to be subject of a CP plan 51. CP cases reviewed on time 52. Emotional health of children 53. Children who have experienced bullying 54. Participation in positive activities 55. Substance misuse by young people 56. Satisfaction with parks and play areas 57. Final warning/reprimand or convictions of CLA 58. Health of children looked after 59. % of CLA substance misuse 60. Adoptions of children looked after Date Measure Per 10,000 % Per 10,000 % Per 10,000 % % % % % % Ratio % % % England % % % 63.3% 48.0% 69.5% 10.9% 44.7% % 5.4% 8.8% South West % % % 63.2% 52.5% 74.6% 11.9% 41.7% % 6.4% 7.9% Torbay % % % 66.5% 55.9% 62.2% 13.3% 36.8% % 5.1% 6.1% Berry Head-with-Furzeham N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Blatchcombe N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Churston-with-Galmpton N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Clifton-with-Maidenway N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Cockington-with-Chelston N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Ellacombe N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Goodrington-with-Roselands N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Preston N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Roundham-with-Hyde N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A St Marychurch N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A St Mary s-with-summercombe N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Shiphay-with-the-Willows N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Tormohun N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Watcombe N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Wellswood N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Younger People notes: 46. Children who were the subject of an Initial Child Protection (CP) Conference, CPR3 Return 2007/08, DCSF 47. Initial Child Protection (CP) Conferences held within 15 days of the start of Section 47 (S.47) Enquiries, CPR3 Return 2007/08, DCSF 48. Children who became the subject of a Child Protection Plan (CPP) during the year ending 31st March 2008, CPR3 Return 2007/08, DCSF 49. NI 65: Children who became subject of a Child Protection Plan (CPP) within twelve months of last discontinuation of a plan by the same authority, CPR3 Return 2007/08, DCSF 50. Children who ceased to be the subject of a Child Protection Plan during the year ending 31st March 2008, CPR3 Return 2007/08, DCSF 51. Child protection cases which were reviewed within required timescales, CPR3 Return 2007/08, DCSF 52. NI 50: Emotional Health of Children (from the TellUs3 Survey) DCSF 53. NI 69: Children who have Experienced Bullying (from the TellUs3 Survey) DCSF 54. NI 110: Young People s Participation in Positive Activities, (from the TellUs3 Survey) DCSF 55. NI 115: Substance Misuse by Young People (from the TellUs3 Survey) DCSF 56. NI 199: Children s and Young People s Satisfaction with Parks and Play Areas (from the TellUs3 Survey) DCSF 57. PAF C18: Final Warning/Reprimand or Convictions of Children Looked After. OC2 Return at 30 September 2007, DCSF 58. PAF C19: Health of Children Looked After, OC2 Return at 30 September 2007, DCSF 59. Substance Misuse of Children Looked After Continuosly for at least one year, OC2 Return at 30 September 2007, DCSF 60. PAF C23: Adoptions of Children Looked After 2007/08, Annual Performance Assessment, DCSF 43

46 Younger People Table 5 of Proportion of clients accessing supporting people services who are aged years 62. Change in number of clients accessing supporting people services who are aged years 63. Effectiveness of child and adolescent mental health (CAMHS) services 64. Childhood overweight and obese 65. Non-elective admissions for injuries and poisonings (0 to 14) 66. Disorders of teeth and jaw 67. Unintentional and deliberate injuries to children and young people 68. First time entrants to the criminal justice system 69. Income deprivation affecting children Date 2007/08 06/07-07/ / / / / / / Measure % % Count % SAR SAR SAR Per 100,000 aged 10 to 17 Rank England 10.0% 9..0% 14 of % ,825 N/A South West 8.7% 4.0% 14 of 16 N/A N/A N/A 127 1,657 N/A Torbay 12.4% 46.0% 13 of % ,344 N/A Berry Head-with-Furzeham N/A N/A N/A 30.7% N/A 2, % to 40% Blatchcombe N/A N/A N/A 27.9% N/A 2, % to 20% Churston-with-Galmpton N/A N/A N/A 20.9% N/A 1, % to 50% Clifton-with-Maidenway N/A N/A N/A 26.2% N/A 1, % to 40% Cockington-with-Chelston N/A N/A N/A 25.7% N/A 2, % to 40% Ellacombe N/A N/A N/A 27.2% N/A 3, % to 20% Goodrington-with-Roselands N/A N/A N/A 22.2% N/A 2, % to 40% Preston N/A N/A N/A 21.9% N/A 1, % to 40% Roundham-with-Hyde N/A N/A N/A 27.2% N/A 2, % to 20% St Marychurch N/A N/A N/A 26.7% N/A 2, % to 30% St Mary s-with-summercombe N/A N/A N/A 24.6% N/A 2, % to 30% Shiphay-with-the-Willows N/A N/A N/A 25.4% N/A 2, % to 40% Tormohun N/A N/A N/A 24.9% N/A 1,988 Top 10% Watcombe N/A N/A N/A 35.8% N/A 2, % to 20% Wellswood N/A N/A N/A 29.1% N/A 2, % to 30% 44 Younger People notes: 61. Proportion of clients accessing Supporting People services who are aged years, Supporting People Client Record Office, 2007/ Change in number of clients accessing Supporting People services who are aged years, Supporting People Client Record Office, 2006/ / NI 51: Effectiveness of child and adolescent mental health (CAMHS) services (LAA), Annual Performance Assessment 2007/ Childhood Obesity. Reception year & Year 6 - Overweight and Obese results from 2007/08 Height and Weight Survey, Torbay Care Trust and NCMP 65. Non-elective admissions for injuries and poisonings (0 to 14), SAR, 2007/ Disorders of teeth and jaw, SAR, 2007/ Unintentional and deliberate injuries to children and young people - Admissions to hospital per 10,000 children aged 0 to 17 (inclusive), 2006/ First time entrants to the Criminal Justice System - Rate of first time enterants aged 10 to 17 to the criminal justice system per 100, to 17 year olds, 2007/08, Torbay Youth Offending Team and DCSF 69. Income Deprivation Affecting Children - Ranking of average SOA score per ward for the Index of Multiple Deprivation 2007

47 Older People This section on Older People is in addition to the Community Plan themes and has been included to give an overview of the challenges and issues for older people in the Bay. Our aim is to improve the quality of life for all residents and, where necessary, personalise packages of care and support to enable independent living. Our key findings The proportion of Torbay s population aged 50 and over is currently 43.5%; this is projected to increase to 45.0% in 5 years time. The proportion of people aged 65 and over is projected to be just under a quarter (24.7%) of the total population in 5 years, compared to around 17.0% nationally. Some examples of the limitations and future developments for the Older People data set Data from the 2001 census will not be updated until the 2011 census. Employment patterns. Skills of older people. Pastimes and hobbies. Volunteering. In 2001 well over a third of all households in the Bay were occupied by a person of pensionable age; of the households occupied by a person of pensionable age, a third were occupied by a lone female of pensionable age. Just under a quarter (23.2%) of the 60 and over population claimed pension credits in 2007/08, compared to 21.2% nationally. The three wards of Ellacombe, Roundham with Hyde and Tormohun had in excess of 30% claiming pension credits. Whilst we have identified indicators relating to the Older People section, we fully acknowledge that there are limitations and gaps due to the data that is available. 45

48 Older People Table 1 of 2 1. Population aged 50 and over 2. Projected population aged 50 and over in Population aged 65 and over 4. Projected population aged 65 and over in Proportion of total population aged 85 and over 6. Projected population aged 85 and over in Total occupied household spaces (all people) 8. Households with at least one person of pensionable age 9. Pensionable households with a lone male 10. Pensionable households with a lone female 11. Household type of pensionable age resident - house or bungalow 12. Household type of pensionable age resident - flat, maisonette 13. Pensionable households - accommodation does not have central heating 14. Pensionable households - owner occupied - owns out right or with a mortgage / loan 15. Pensionable households - council or social rented Date Measure % % % % % % Count % % % % % % % % England 33.7% 35.2% 15.9% 17.4% 2.1% 2.4% 21,262, % 11.1% 34.5% 80.8% 18.3% 10.4% 69.5% 22.8% South West 38.1% 39.7% 18.7% 20.8% 2.7% 3.1% 2,185, % 10.2% 33.9% 82.8% 15.9% 10.0% 76.3% 15.7% Torbay 43.5% 45.0% 22.7% 24.7% 3.8% 4.0% 60, % 10.9% 35.6% 71.6% 27.3% 13.1% 82.2% 8.5% Berry Head-with-Furzeham 51.9% N/A 27.7% N/A 4.1% N/A 5, % 10.5% 35.3% 78.8% 21.0% 10.0% 83.1% 7.5% Blatchcombe 33.6% N/A 15.8% N/A 1.6% N/A 4, % 11.9% 30.4% 80.8% 13.1% 18.5% 75.6% 17.8% Churston-with-Galmpton 59.2% N/A 34.3% N/A 5.8% N/A 3, % 10.3% 30.6% 94.8% 4.9% 5.2% 93.0% 3.1% Clifton-with-Maidenway 42.7% N/A 21.6% N/A 3.2% N/A 3, % 10.5% 29.9% 88.3% 11.2% 15.5% 91.7% 3.2% Cockington-with-Chelston 40.3% N/A 19.8% N/A 3.1% N/A 4, % 8.2% 32.3% 79.8% 20.2% 15.8% 86.6% 5.5% Ellacombe 31.9% N/A 14.3% N/A 2.3% N/A 3, % 13.5% 36.4% 68.9% 30.8% 28.7% 78.9% 6.4% Goodrington-with-Roselands 44.3% N/A 22.5% N/A 3.6% N/A 3, % 9.8% 37.4% 74.6% 23.7% 10.0% 81.4% 11.7% Preston 49.3% N/A 27.7% N/A 5.3% N/A 4, % 9.6% 37.0% 68.0% 30.9% 8.9% 87.3% 5.0% Roundham-with-Hyde 47.4% N/A 26.6% N/A 6.0% N/A 3, % 14.1% 45.7% 37.3% 61.2% 16.3% 71.0% 10.8% Shiphay-with-the-Willows 45.7% N/A 25.7% N/A 5.7% N/A 3, % 10.5% 33.2% 86.1% 13.1% 11.8% 78.9% 13.5% St Mary s-with-summercombe 45.0% N/A 24.6% N/A 3.4% N/A 3, % 10.1% 32.2% 86.4% 13.4% 16.8% 87.3% 6.7% St Marychurch 33.5% N/A 15.5% N/A 2.0% N/A 5, % 11.0% 39.7% 63.6% 35.6% 14.6% 81.8% 4.9% Tormohun 35.5% N/A 15.9% N/A 2.6% N/A 5, % 12.0% 41.1% 48.3% 51.1% 14.4% 70.0% 14.7% Watcombe 39.1% N/A 19.8% N/A 2.2% N/A 3, % 11.3% 32.5% 86.2% 12.6% 15.4% 76.1% 19.3% Wellswood 57.2% N/A 32.9% N/A 6.5% N/A 4, % 11.4% 37.1% 45.4% 53.8% 6.7% 83.5% 4.5% Older People notes: 1. Population aged 50 and over Mid Year Estimate, ONS 2. Projected population aged 50 and over in Based, 2008 Sub National Population Projections, ONS 3. Population aged 65 and over Mid Year Estimate, ONS 4. Projected population aged 65 and over in Based, 2008 Sub National Population Projections, ONS 5. Proportion of total population aged 85 and over Mid Year Estimate, ONS 6. Projected population aged 85 and over in Based, 2008 Sub National Population Projections, ONS 7. Total Occupied Household Spaces (all people), 2001 Census, ONS 8. Households with at least one person of pensionable age, 2001 Census, ONS 9. Pensionable households with a lone Male, 2001 Census, ONS 10. Pensionable households with a lone Female, 2001 Census, ONS 11. Household type of pensionable age resident - House or bungalow, 2001 Census, ONS 12. Household type of pensionable age resident - Flat, maisonette, 2001 Census, ONS 13. Pensionable households - Accommodation does not have central heating, 2001 Census, ONS 14. Pensionable households - Owner occupied - Owns out right or with a mortgage / loan, 2001 Census, ONS 15. Pensionable households - Council or Social rented, 2001 Census, ONS 46

49 Older People Table 2 of Pensionable households - private rented and over population claiming pension credits 18. Duration of pension credit claim - 5 years and over 19. Pension credit claimant living - with partner 20. Pension credit claimant living - single 21. Part of pension credit claimed - guarantee element only 22. Part of pension credit claimed - saving element only 23. Proportion claiming both elements of pension credits 24. Healthy life expectancy at age 65 - males 25. Healthy life expectancy at age 65 - females 26. All admissions for injuries and poisonings population 27. All admissions for circulatory population 28. All admissions for cancer of the ovary - females aged All admissions for cancer of the prostate - males aged Income deprivation affecting older people Date / / / / / / / / / / / / / Measure % % % % % % % % Years Years SAR SAR SAR SAR Rank England 4.3% 21.2% 38.3% 22.2% 77.8% 30.9% 21.9% 47.2% N/A South West 4.6% 17.7% 35.5% 22.6% 77.4% 26.2% 23.1% 50.8% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Torbay 7.4% 23.2% 39.9% 23.7% 76.3% 29.5% 19.3% 51.2% N/A Berry Head-with-Furzeham 7.4% 21.3% 39.9% 29.1% 70.9% 31.5% 18.8% 49.8% N/A N/A % to 30% Blatchcombe 3.8% 26.3% 36.1% 32.7% 67.3% 30.2% 22.8% 47.0% N/A N/A % to 20% Churston-with-Galmpton 2.5% 13.0% 30.5% 29.5% 70.5% 20.5% 21.5% 57.9% N/A N/A % to 70% Clifton-with-Maidenway 4.3% 19.4% 36.5% 30.9% 69.1% 23.1% 19.9% 57.0% N/A N/A % to 50% Cockington-with-Chelston 6.1% 17.9% 35.5% 25.4% 74.6% 28.4% 23.5% 48.1% N/A N/A % to 40% Ellacombe 13.5% 36.8% 43.1% 20.5% 79.5% 34.5% 16.9% 48.7% N/A N/A Top 10% Goodrington-with-Roselands 4.2% 21.8% 38.9% 25.1% 74.9% 22.7% 22.1% 55.2% N/A N/A % to 40% Preston 6.1% 20.9% 38.1% 22.6% 77.4% 23.9% 18.7% 57.4% N/A N/A % to 40% Roundham-with-Hyde 15.8% 31.5% 42.7% 17.4% 82.6% 31.9% 17.1% 51.0% N/A N/A Top 10% Shiphay-with-the-Willows 4.9% 26.4% 41.0% 18.1% 81.9% 26.1% 18.7% 55.2% N/A N/A % to 20% St Mary s-with-summercombe 4.5% 23.9% 35.6% 27.1% 72.9% 28.0% 22.8% 49.2% N/A N/A % to 30% St Marychurch 11.2% 22.3% 37.6% 30.9% 69.1% 26.0% 21.4% 52.6% N/A N/A % to 30% Tormohun 14.1% 32.2% 45.2% 16.8% 83.2% 38.1% 16.7% 45.2% N/A N/A Top10% Watcombe 1.7% 25.9% 46.2% 27.5% 72.5% 35.0% 17.1% 47.9% N/A N/A % to 20% Wellswood 10.2% 17.9% 43.3% 15.8% 84.2% 35.1% 15.8% 49.1% N/A N/A % to 40% Older People notes: 16. Pensionable households - Private rented, 2001 Census, ONS and over population claiming Pension Credits, 2007/08 (quarterly average) DWP 18. Duration of Pension Credit claim - 5 years and over, 2007/08 (quarterly average) DWP 19. Pension Credit Claimant living - with Partner, 2007/08 (quarterly average) DWP 20. Pension Credit Claimant living - Single, 2007/08 (quarterly average) DWP 21. Part of Pension Credit claimed - Guarantee Element Only, 2007/08 (quarterly average) DWP 22. Part of Pension Credit claimed - Saving Element Only, 2007/08 (quarterly average) DWP 23. Proportion claiming both elements of Pension Credits., 2007/08 (quarterly average) DWP 24. Healthy Life Expectancy at age 65 - Males, Number of years it can be expected to live in good or fairly-good health at age /02, ONS 25. Healthy Life Expectancy at age 65 - Females, Number of years it can be expected to live in good or fairly-good health at age /02, ONS 26. All Admissions for Injuries and Poisonings population - all admissions to hospital in 2007/08, SAR 27. All admissions for Circulatory population - all admissions to hospital in 2007/08, SAR 28. All Admissions for cancer of the Ovary - Female (65+) - all admissions to hospital in 2007/08, SAR 29. All Admissions for Cancer of the Prostate - Male (65+) - all admissions to hospital in 2007/08, SAR 30. Rank of Income Deprivation Affecting Older People Sub Domain - Ranking of average SOA score per ward for the Index of Multiple Deprivation

50 Vulnerable People This section on Vulnerable People is in addition to the Community Plan themes and has been included to give an overview of the challenges and issues for vulnerable people in the Bay. We are committed to safeguarding all vulnerable people in Torbay and delivering a wide range of quality services to meet the needs of users. Services which protect and focus on individuals, supporting them where necessary to maintain independence wherever possible. Our key findings 5,000 adults in Torbay received community care services during 2007/08 for physical disability, frailty and sensory impairment, learning disability, mental health, substance misuse and vulnerable people services. This is a rate of 4,860 per 100,000 locally compared to 3,990 nationally. Some examples of the limitations and future developments for the Vulnerable People data set Data from the 2001 census will not be updated until the 2011 census. Experience of patient care. Family perceptions of care packages received. Predictive modelling of future service demands. Safeguarding adults. The rate of older people aged 65 and over admitted on a permanent basis to residential or nursing care homes in the Bay is significantly higher than the national rate. Torbay has a lower rate of adults with mental health problems helped to live at home. Levels of people providing unpaid care in Torbay are higher than both the national and regional levels, with 2.8% of the total Torbay population providing 50+ hours a week unpaid care, compared to 2% nationally. Whilst we have identified indicators relating to the Vulnerable People section, we fully acknowledge that there are limitations and gaps due to the data that is available. 48