CHARLOTTE COUNTY PUNTA GORDA MPO

Transcription

1 CHARLOTTE COUNTY PUNTA GORDA MPO 2035 Long Range Transportation Plan Summary Report (For Adoption by Charlotte County Punta Gorda MPO Board on December 13, 2010)

2

3 Table of Contents Table of Contents Introduction and Background Long Range Transportation Process Goals and Objectives SAFETEA LU Florida Transportation Plan Planning Tools Socioeconomic Data Development Summary of Socioeconomic Data Needs Plan Highway Needs Plan Public Transportation Needs Plan Bicycle Improvement Plan Pedestrian Improvement Plan Cost Feasible Plan Cost Feasible Plan: Roadways to 2025 Roadway Improvements to 2035 Roadway Improvements Cost Feasible Plan: Public Transportation Multi Use Trail, Pedestrian, and Bicycle Projects Public Involvement Congestion Management Process Plan Implementation Measures of Access Control Appendix 2A: 2015 to 2035 Cost Feasible Plan Roadway Improvements Table (in Millions) Appendix 2B: Long Range Transit Element Maps Map 1 1: Population Growth Map 1 2: Total Employment Growth Map 1 3: 2035 Needs Plan Number of Lanes and Lane Improvements Map 1 4: 2035 Transit Needs Map 1 5: 2035 BicycleNeeds Map 1 6: Pedestrian Needs Map 2 1: Existing and Committed Roadway Improvements Map 2 2: Cost Feasible Roadway Plan Map 2 3: 2035 LRTP Cost Feasible Roadway Improvements Map 2 4: 2035 Cost Feasible Public Transportation Route Improvements Map 2 5: 2035 Cost Feasible Plan Multi Use Trail Facilities Map 2 6: 2035 Cost Feasible Bicycle Facilities Map 2 7: 2035 Cost Feasible Pedestrian Facilities Map 3 1: Congestion Management Process Congested Corridor Network Map 3 2: Congestion Management Process Study Corridors Map 3 3: Access Control Study Corridors Tables Table 1 1: Socioeconomic Data Summary Table 2 1: Cost Feasible Plan Summary (YOE) Table 2 2: Roadway Cost Summary Figures Figure 1 1: Long Range Transportation Plan Figure 1 2: Planning Tool Applications Figure 3 1: Congestion Management Process Figure 3 2: Measures of Access Control

4 Introduction and Background The Charlotte County Punta Gorda Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) is responsible for developing the 2035 Long Range Transportation Plan for Charlotte County and Punta Gorda as well as a portion of DeSoto County within the MPO planning area boundary. The improvements identified in this plan will provide for future mobility needs and will enhance safety and security within the county. This summary report documents the Charlotte County Punta Gorda MPO 2035 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP). The LRTP sets forth a vision to address the transportation system needs through cost feasible improvements in Charlotte County through the year The multimodal plan documented in this report outline highways, public transportation (transit), bicycle facilities, pedestrian facilities, and multiuse trail improvements. The purpose of this plan is to address federal and state requirements by identifying projects that are cost feasible for each mode of travel. This 2035 Long Range Transportation Plan represents a significant effort to address the long term transportation needs of Charlotte County. Key highlights of this plan include: Implementation of Fixed Route Public Transportation Service Extending Burnt Store Rd to US 17 in Punta Gorda Widen US 41 to 6 lanes from Flamingo to Sarasota County line. The following pages summarize the plan that will be adopted by the Charlotte County Punta Gorda MPO Board on December 13,

5 Long Range Transportation Plan Process The LRTP Plan development process starts with developing the future assumptions used for the plan, such as socioeconomic data (population and employment estimates) that influence the demand for transportation in the future. Estimating the future transportation demand, or needs, then leads to the development and adoption of the Cost Feasible Plan. The Cost Feasible Plan guides the funding and implementation timeframe of future transportation projects. Throughout the process, several workshops were conducted to involve the public and other transportation stakeholders in the development of the plan. The chart below displays the steps and phases of the LRTP process that were followed in developing the plan. Further information on public involvement activities are summarized later within this report. Figure 1 1: Long Range Transportation Plan. The LRTP process includes three major phases. 1 3

6 Goals and Objectives The 2035 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) establishes a set of goals that have been updated from the 2030 LRTP to comply with federal transportation requirements, including the Safe Accountable Flexible Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA LU), passed in 2005, and the Florida Transportation Plan. GOALS of the Charlotte County Punta Gorda MPO 2035 LRTP: SAFETEA LU To comply with SAFETEA LU, the goals and objectives set forth in the 2035 LRTP must address the eight metropolitan planning factors identified below: 1. Support the economic vitality of the metropolitan area, especially by enabling global competitiveness, productivity, and efficiency. 2. Increase the safety of the transportation system for motorized and non motorized users. 3. Increase the security of the transportation system for motorized and non motorized users. 4. Increase the accessibility and mobility of people and for freight. 5. Protect and enhance the environment, promote energy conservation, improve the quality of life, and promote consistency between transportation improvements and State and local planned growth and economic development patterns. 6. Enhance the integration and connectivity of the transportation system, across and between modes, for people and freight. 7. Promote efficient system management and operation. 8. Emphasize the preservation of the existing transportation system. FLORIDA TRANSPORTATION PLAN The 2035 LRTP is required by State statute to be consistent with the goals and objectives of the Florida Transportation Plan. These goals, as of March 2006, are: 1. A safer and more secure transportation system for residents, businesses, and visitors. 2. Enriched quality of life and responsible environmental stewardship. 3. Adequate and cost efficient maintenance and preservation of Florida s transportation assets. 4. A stronger economy through enhanced mobility for people and freight. 5. Sustainable transportation investments for Florida s future. 1. Develop a transportation system that serves the needs of all travel modes and provides intermodal/multimodal connectivity. 2. Provide highway corridor capacity for the safe, secure, effective, and efficient movement of people and goods 3. Develop a financially feasible plan with multimodal facilities and services that supports economic development 4. Utilize the MPO Advisory Committee structure to address federal, state, and local requirements for transportation planning. 5. Preserve, and wherever possible, enhance the community s social and environmental values. 6. Follow state and federal requirements and ensure coordination among all involved governmental agencies to increase the efficiency of the system. 7. Encourage public involvement through the public participation process and ensure that the Plan and all MPO planning activities reflect the needs of the community, particularly the traditionally underserved populations. 1 4

7 Planning Tools ArcMap Geographic Analysis Land Use Allocation Model Developable Lands to People & Employment Socioeconomic Data Forecast Network Alternative Improvement Projects One of the planning tools used to estimate needed transportation in the future is the development of socioeconomic data, which included forecasting 2035 population, employment, hotel/motel units, and school enrollment. SOCIOECONOMIC DATA DEVELOPMENT Development of Charlotte County s socioeconomic data involved the following steps: SUMMARY OF SOCIOECONOMIC DATA Table 1 1 summarizes the control totals used to forecast future population and employment within Charlotte County. The current and future land uses, population, and employment, in addition to planned development, represent the basis for this forecast. The allocation of growth to different areas is based on modeling efforts, public involvement, and consultation with County staff and is described in greater detail in the 2035 LRTP Final Report and Technical Support Appendix. 1. Developing countywide control totals for population, The socioeconomic data forecast results are illustrated in employment, school enrollment, and hotel/motels. Maps 1 1 and 1 2. These maps illustrate which areas of the SMC Regional Planning Model Travel Demand Model Visual Transportation Inventory & Analysis System Improvement Project Costing 2. Allocating approved development to the appropriate areas using the County s database and geographic information systems (GIS). county have the most growth in population and employment occurring between 2007 and Visual Transportation Inventory & Analysis System Alternative Analysis and Evaluation 3. Calculating vacant developable lands in Charlotte County using GIS. 4. Allocating growth to appropriate zones throughout the county using a land use allocation model and GIS. ArcMap Geographic Mapping Table 1 1: Socioeconomic Data Summary Long Range Transportation Plan Maps Long Range Transportation Plan Reports Control Totals by Year Growth by Timeframe Public Involvement Exercises (Throughout Plan Development) Total Population 159, , , ,578 13,874 38,680 49, , Output Element Total Employees 64,527 70,256 87, ,234 5,729 16,784 22,194 44,707 Industrial Employees 7,795 7,889 9,295 11, ,406 2,069 3,569 Planning Tool or Process Commercial Employees 12,111 12,724 15,486 19, ,762 3,777 7,152 Figure 1 2: Planning Tool Applications Service Employees 44,621 49,643 62,259 78,607 5,022 12,616 16,348 33,986 Source: Bureau of Economic and Business Research, Florida Statistical Abstract 2008,Table University of Florida,

8 2035 Socioeconomic Data Forecast Total Population 2007: 159, : 261,578 Growth: 101,857 Map 1 1: Population Growth 1 6

9 2035 Socioeconomic Data Forecast Total Employment 2007: 64, : 109,234 Growth: 44,707 Map 1 2: Total Employment Growth 1 7

10 2035 Needs Plan: Introduction The Needs Plan was developed to include transportation improvements based on the level of demand; however, the plan is constrained by policy and community values. The Needs Plan was later used to develop the Cost Feasible Plan. This plan represents the needed multimodal transportation improvements in Charlotte County without regard to costs; however, if additional revenues become available, the Cost Feasible Plan can be amended to include additional projects from the Needs Plan. HIGHWAY NEEDS PLAN The Needs Plan consists of $1.9 billion (PDC) or $3.9 billion (YOE) of roadway expansion, grade separation, and mobility improvements. Approximately $820 million (PDC) or $1.3 billion (YOE) of the projects in the Needs Plan are funded in the Cost Feasible Plan, and $1.1 billion (PDC) or $2.6 billion (YOE) are unfunded. Highlights of the proposed Needs Plan highway improvements are as follows: PUBLIC TRANSPRTATION NEEDS PLAN This section summarizes the 2035 Public Transportation Needs Plan for Charlotte County. Proposed changes to public transportation services and facilities for the 2035 Needs Plan are illustrated in Map 1 4. The Public Transportation Needs Plan identifies the need for fixed transit services along US 41 and SR 776, in addition to flex route service. These needs were identified through the following methods: Services identified as part of the analysis from the adopted Transit Development Plan (TDP) Update Adopted TDP s and LRTP s of surrounding counties Public involvement Projected population and employment growth from socioeconomic data forecasts Expand I 75 to 8 lanes from county line to county line Expansion of and access management on SR 776 and US 41 New interchange at I 75 just north of Sarasota County line to connect to Veterans Blvd. Extension of Burnt Store Rd. to US 17 Expand Toledo Blade Blvd. to 6 lanes from SR 776 to Sarasota County Line Expand Midway Blvd and Rampart Blvd to 4 lanes Expand SR 776 to 6 lanes from Crestview Dr. to Sunnybrook Blvd. New 4 lane Piper Rd. alignment from Henry St. to US 17 Expansion of US 41 bridge Expand Veterans Blvd. to 6 lanes from Murdock Circle to Hillsborough Ave. BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN NEEDS PLAN Roadways considered as needing bicycle facilities are those roadways that do not have existing facilities already. Pedestrian needs include roadways that do not have existing facilities and are located within the urbanized area. Maps 1 5 and 1 6 show these needs. These improvements are displayed in Map

11 2035 Needs Plan: Roadway Improvements Map 1 3: 2035 Needs Plan Number of Lanes and Lane Improvements 1 9

12 2035 Needs Plan: Transit Improvements Map 1 4: 2035 Transit Needs 1 10

13 2035 Needs Plan: Bicycle Improvements Map 1 5: 2035 Bicycle Needs 1 11

14 2035 Needs Plan: Pedestrian Improvements Map 1 6: 2035 Pedestrian Needs 1 12

15 2035 Cost Feasible Plan: Introduction The Cost Feasible Plan will be adopted by the Charlotte County Punta Gorda Metropolitan Planning Organization Board on December 13, The Cost Feasible Plan reflects approximately a $1.5 billion (YOE) transportation program from 2015 to Nearly 51% of revenues that fund the plan are from local sources, while approximately 17% are from federal and state sources. Nearly 91% of available revenues will be spent on Highway Expansion projects, with approximately 6% going towards transit related expenditures (operations and capital). Table 2 1 displays the total costs by transportation mode in dollars, the revenue source for each revenue type, as well as a breakdown of local revenues. Improvements in the 2010 to 2015 timeframe are considered committed projects, as they are already funded in the work program. The plan includes improvements for several modes of travel. This report will highlight improvements for highways and public transportation. Also, funding for multi use trail, bicycle, pedestrian, and Congestion Management Process/ Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) improvements is discussed. Highway and Road Projects The Cost Feasible Plan includes $1.36 billion (YOE) in highway expansion projects between 2015 and Improvement projects in the work program (2010 to 2014) are displayed in Map 2 2. Proposed highway improvements from 2015 to 2025 are illustrated in Map 2 2, proposed highway improvements from 2026 to 2035 are shown in Map 2 3. Table 2 2 summarizes the roadway Cost Feasible Plan. Appendix 2A documents the roadway improvement projects and their associated cost estimates and funding, and highlights of the proposed highway improvements by the two timeframes displayed on the map are provided below to 2035 Cost Feasible Roadway Improvements Widen US 41 to Six Lanes from Flamingo Blvd. to Sarasota County Widen SR 776 to Six Lanes from Crestview Dr. to Sunnybrook Blvd. Widen Toledo Blade Blvd. to Six Lanes from SR 776 to Sarasota County Widen Harborview Rd. to Four Lanes from Melbourne to I 75 Widen Burnt Store Rd. to Four Lanes from Zemel Rd. to Notre Dame Blvd. Construct a Burnt Store Rd. Extension as Six Lanes from US 41 to US 17 Widen US 41 to Six Lanes from Notre Dame Blvd. To Burnt Store Rd. Widen S. Jones Loop Rd. to Six Lanes from US 41 to I 75 Widen CR 74 to Four Lanes from US 17 to SR 31 (Developer Constructed) Widen SR 31 to Four Lanes from Lee County to CR 74 (Developer Constructed) Extend Piper Rd. as a Four Lane Roadway from Henry St. to US 17 Expand Veterans Blvd. from Murdock Circle to Hillsborough Ave. Congestion Management (CMP) and Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) Projects The Cost Feasible Plan includes $6.73 million (YOE) of Boxed Funding for Congestion Management and ITS related projects from 2015 to Specific projects will be prioritized and selected on an annual basis through the CMP update process which will identify projects for funding in the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). Table 2 1: Cost Feasible Plan Summary (YOE) Mode/Program Total Cost Percent Highway Expansion* $1,360,460, % Highway Maintenance $44,963, % Transit (operations & capital) $79,808, % TOTAL $1,485,231, % Revenue Source Total Revenues Percent Federal and State Revenues $246,126, % SIS/FIHS $4,220, % Local Revenues $752,854, % Developer Revenues $489,920, % TOTAL $1,493,120, % Composition of Local Revenues Total Revenues Percent Transportation Impact Fees $68,560, % Infrastructure Sales Tax $394,239, % Gas Tax $283,428, % Local Transit $6,625, % TOTAL $752,854, % *Includes Multi modal and CMS Boxed Funds Table 2 2: Roadway Cost Summary Cost (in millions) Year of Present Day Expenditure Needs Plan $ 1, $ 3, Cost Feasible Plan* $ $ 1, Unfunded Needs $ 1, $ 2, *Includes Multi modal and CMS Boxed Funds 2 1.

16 2035 Cost Feasible Plan: Existing and Committed Roadways, 2010 to 2014 Improvements Map 2 1: Existing and Committed Roadway Improvements ( ) This map includes the improvements in the five year work program. The yellow highlights indicate roadways that will be improved by

17 2035 Cost Feasible Plan: 2025 Interim Plan, Tier I 2015 to 2025 Improvements Map 2 2: Cost Feasible Roadway Plan Yellow highlights on the map indicate improvements occurring between 2015 and

18 2035 Cost Feasible Plan: Tier I 2026 to 2035 Improvements Map 2 3: Cost Feasible Roadway Plan Yellow highlights on the map indicate improvements occurring between 2026 and

19 2035 Cost Feasible Plan: Public Transportation Public Transportation Projects For Public Transportation the plan includes a total investment of over $79.8 million (YOE) in capital and operating costs that will facilitate the implementation of fixed route public transit service (buses) along portions of US 41 and SR 776. This fixed route service will be in addition to demand responsive service provided by Dial A Ride. In some cases the fixed route service will be able to accommodate trips that would otherwise need to use the Dial A Ride service at a higher cost. The planned coverage for the 2035 Cost Feasible Plan is illustrated in Map 2 4 and the specific project costs and revenue sources are documented in Appendix 2B. The routes included as part of the Cost Feasible Plan are those that are included in the adopted Transit Development Plan. Some of the highlights include: Fixed route Transit along US 41 to connect Punta Gorda with the hospital and Murdock Village Fixed route Transit along SR 776 to connect Sarasota County to Murdock Village and the US 41 Fixed Route Continued funding of demand responsive service (Dial A Ride) 2 5

20 2035 Cost Feasible Plan: Tier I Public Transportation Improvements Map Cost Feasible Public Transportation Public Transportation Improvements include the adopted TDP improvements. 2 6

21 2035 Cost Feasible Plan: Tier I Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Multi use Trail Improvements MULTI USE TRAIL, PEDESTRIAN, AND BICYCLE PROJECTS Proposed pedestrian, bicycle, and multi use trail improvements for the 2035 Cost Feasible Plan are identified in Maps 2 5, 2 6, and 2 7. Highlights of the proposed multi use trail, pedestrian, and bicycle improvement program include the following: Significant expansion of the bicycle network associated with new roadway construction or the expansion of existing roadways in a cost effective fashion. Expansion of the sidewalk network associated with new roadway construction or the expansion of existing roadways in a cost effective fashion in the urbanized area. Continuation of the Punta Gorda Ring Around the City multi use trail system. The Cost Feasible Plan also provides for $27.6 million (PDC) or $46.8 (YOE) in boxed funds for multi modal improvements to be prioritized on an annual basis. 2 7

22 2035 Cost Feasible Plan: Multi use Trail Improvements Map 2 5: 2035 Cost Feasible Plan Multi Use Trail Facilities The map displays existing multi use trails as well as trails to be built by Boxed revenues can be used to build desired trails from the Conceptual Trails identified in pink. 2 8

23 2035 Cost Feasible Plan: Bicycle Facility Improvements Map 2 6: 2035 Cost Feasible Plan Bicycle Facilities The map displays existing bicycle facilities as well as facilities to be built by Facilities built as part of the Tier 1 roadway improvements are shown in red. Boxed revenues can be used to build other desired facilities not shown on the map. 2 9

24 2035 Cost Feasible Plan: Pedestrian Facility Improvements Map 2 7: 2035 Cost Feasible Plan Pedestrian Facilities The map displays existing pedestrian facilities as well as facilities to be built by Facilities built as part of the Tier 1 roadway improvements are shown in red. Boxed revenues can be used to build other desired facilities not shown on the map. 2 10

25 Public Involvement The Charlotte County Punta Gorda MPO 2035 Long Range Transportation Plan included a significant public involvement effort. The purpose of these efforts was to obtain feedback from the public and local staff. Transportation needs for all modes of travel were developed and presented to the public. The public was involved in the development of the Cost Feasible Plan by providing feedback on the highest priority transportation improvements. Below is a list of public involvement activities conducted throughout the development of the plan: PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT OPPORTUNITIES: Stakeholder Interviews February & March 2010 Consensus Building Workshops April 20, 2010 June 15, 2010 August 31, 2010 MPO Board Meetings May 10, 2010 August 9, 2010 October 11, 2010 December 13, 2010 Environmental Justice Workshop May 18, 2010 Neighborhood Workshops May 27, 2010 June 24, 2010 July 1, 2010 July 9, 2010 Technical Advisory Committee Meetings April 21, 2010 July 21, 2010 September 22, 2010 November 17, 2010 Citizens Advisory Committee Meetings April 21, 2010 July 21, 2010 September 22, 2010 November 17, 2010 Congestion Management Process Workshop August 25, 2010 Additional information on the Public Involvement process and comments from the public can be found in the 2035 Long Range Transportation 3 1

26 Congestion Management Process The Charlotte County Punta Gorda MPO developed a new Congestion Management Process in conjunction with the 2035 Long Range Transportation Plan. As part of the process, congested corridors in the County were identified and ranked on three levels Extremely Congested, Minimally Congested, and Approaching Congestion. The map below displays the roadways on the Congested Corridor Network. Step 1 Congested Corridor Network Identification Step 2 CMP and Safety Strategy Screening Step 3 Project and Program Identification and Implementation Map 3 1: Congestion Management Process: Congested Corridor Network Project or Program Developed Figure 3 1: Congestion Management Process 3 2

27 Congestion Management Process Two preliminary corridor screenings were completed as part of the Congestion Management Process. The potential congestion mitigation strategies that may be considered in these corridors are identified below. US 41 (PEACE RIVER BRIDGE TO MURDOCK CIRCLE) Highly effective Solutions: Integrated Corridor Management Channelization Intersection Improvements (study) Freeway Incident Detection and Management Systems Add General Purpose Travel Lanes Other effective solutions: Infill Development Transit Capacity Expansion Complete Streets Improved Signage Managed Lanes Dynamic Messaging New Sidewalk Connections Exclusive Non Motorized Right of Way Design Guidelines for Pedestrian Oriented Development Increasing Bus Route Coverage of Frequencies Designated Bicycle Lanes on Local Streets Improved Bicycle Facilities at Transit Stations and Other Trip Destinations Improved Safety of Existing Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Advanced Traveler Information Systems (ATIS) Access Management Policies (CAMP Study) KINGS HIGHWAY (US 41 TO SANDHILL BOULEVARD) Highly effective solutions: Traffic Signal Coordination Channelization Intersection Improvements Other effective solutions: Infill Development Mixed Use Development Transit Capacity Expansion Increasing Bus Route Coverage or Frequencies New Sidewalk Connection Designated Bicycle Lanes on Local Streets Improved Safety of Existing Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Access Management Policies Complete Streets Add General Purpose Travel Lanes Map 3 2: Congestion Management Process Study Corridors 3 3

28 Plan Implementation During one of the public workshops, participants were asked several questions regarding policy changes that could be implemented to improve the transportation system in Charlotte County. The following policy changes were identified: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES The following Comprehensive Plan changes were suggested: Access Management/Access Controls Define Complete Streets Policy Support Local Public Transportation System (Fixed Route) It was decided by the participants that the proposed Comprehensive Plan policy changes listed above should be implemented jointly be the County and the City of Punta Gorda. LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE POLICIES The following Land Development Code changes were also suggested: Form based Codes Design Streets to Accommodate All Appropriate Modes of Travel Transit Oriented Land Use Design Guidelines Alternative Concurrency Provisions and Funding Strategies Transit Corridor Design Guidelines 3 4

29 Measures of Access Control Through the Public Involvement process, the public was presented with a summary of various measures of Access Control similar to the diagram below and asked to evaluate the two major intersecting corridors of SR 776/ Veterans Blvd and US 41 north of Punta Gorda. Participants provided feedback in terms of which measures would be most desirable for specific portions of each corridor. The summary of their responses are listed on the following page. Access Management Frontage Roads Multiway Boulevard Limited Access Road (Freeway) Design of a roadway that limits the points of conflict between paths of users. Use medians to limit left turns Increase a distance between driveways Introducing right turn lanes or tapers Non limited access road Provides access and service to adjacent highspeed roadways access points with the main roadway at limited locations provide service to adjacent properties preserving right of way on freeway FRONT FACING FRONTAGE ROAD Wide, multi lane, divided arterial Center lanes designated for higherspeed thru traffic Extra lanes on each side designated for access and circulation Use of medians and street trees to separate traffic flow. Context sensitive design solution for urban arterial roadways Limited access divided highway Designed for higher speed regional travel Grade separations at intersections (no signals or stop signs) The safest roadways per vehicle miles of travel Can also run behind properties backage or rear facing frontage road (below). REAR FACING FRONTAGE ROAD ACCESS LANES MAIN LANES ACCESS LANES Figure 3 2: Measures of Access Control 3 5

30 FRONTAGE ROAD State Road 776 Veterans Blvd Creating a parallel service road along the corridor to serve businesses with frontage along US 41. Provides a limited number of access points to the service road. A partially existing frontage road system is already in place along this portion of US 41. Completing this system would enhance its benefits by providing greater level of accessibility without increasing congestion. US Highway 41 ACCESS MANAGEMENT Increases safety by limiting median openings and curb openings, reducing the possible points of collision between motorists. Introducing channelized turn lanes and tapers to keep thru traffic moving. Decreases the amount of stop and go traffic, thereby relieving congestion. MULTIWAY BOULEVARD Creates a safer environment for pedestrians and bicyclists within the Murdock Village area. Provides center thru lanes to accommodate the regional trips that utilize this corridor. Map 3 3: Access Control Study Corridors 3 6

31 Appendix 2A 2015 to 2035 Cost Feasible Plan Roadway Improvements Table (In Millions) 3 7

32 Appendix 2A: 2015 to 2035 Cost Feasible Plan Roadway Improvements (Tier I) Table (in Millions) ID/FPN Facility From To # of Existing Lanes Project Length (Miles) Project Description PD&E (FDOT) / Planning Study (County) Cost (PDC) Funding Source Year of Expenditure Cost (PDC) PE Funding Source Year of Expenditure Cost (PDC) ROW Funding Source Year of Expenditure Cost (PDC) CST Funding Source Year of Expenditure Total Project Cost (PDC) Total Project Cost (YOE) C BURNT STORE RD ZEMEL RD SCHAM RD 2U 4.17 Miles CR 2U-->4D $ 1.62 <Multiple C BURNT STORE RD SCHAM RD NOTRE DAME BLVD 2U Miles CR 2U-->4D $ 0.18 <Multiple C00190 BURNT STORE RD N JONES LOOP TAYLOR RD 2U Miles CR 2U-->6D $ 0.77 <Multiple C00192 BURNT STORE RD TAYLOR RD FLORIDA ST Miles CR 00-->6D $ 2.46 <Multiple C CR 39 (TOLEDO BLADE) C CR 39 (TOLEDO HILLSBOROUGH RUSKIN AVE BLADE) BLVD C CR 39 (TOLEDO BLADE) C CR 39 (TOLEDO BLADE) C CR 74 US 17 URBAN AREA BOUNDARY C CR 74 URBAN AREA QUARTER MILE BOUNDARY ISOLATED INT C CR 74 QUARTER MILE ISOLATED INT 2015 $ 4.86 <Multiple 2015 $ 0.55 <Multiple $ 2.32 <Multiple $ 7.39 <Multiple 2015 $ 2.75 <Multiple $ 0.31 <Multiple $ 1.24 <Multiple $ <Multiple $ Local $ $ $ 3.68 <Multiple $ <Multiple $ 4.73 $ $ $ $ Local $ $ US 41 (W) RUSKIN AVE 4D 0.52 Miles CR 4D-->6D $ 0.20 Local $ 0.61 Local $ 5.44 Local $ 4.04 Local $ $ D Miles CR 4D-->6D $ 0.18 Local $ 0.55 Local $ 4.97 Local $ 3.69 Local $ 9.39 $ SR 776 WHITNEY AVE 2U Miles CR 2U-->6D $ 0.40 Local $ 1.21 Local $ 5.45 Local $ 8.09 Local $ $ WHITNEY AVE US 41(W) 4D Miles CR 4D-->6D $ 0.10 Local $ 0.29 Local $ 2.60 Local $ 1.93 Local $ 4.92 $ U Miles CR 2U-->4D $ 1.04 Developer $ 3.11 Developer $ Developer $ Developer $ $ U Miles CR 2U-->4D $ 3.73 Developer $ Developer $ 4.03 Developer $ Developer $ $ SR 31 2U Miles CR 2U-->4D $ 0.09 Developer $ 0.26 Developer $ 0.09 Developer $ 1.73 Developer $ 2.17 $ 3.74 C00225 CR 771 ROTUNDA EAST INGRAHAM BLVD 2U 0.3 Miles CR 2U-->4D $ 0.12 Local $ 0.35 Local $ - Local $ 2.33 Local $ 2.79 $ 5.72 C00230 CR 771 INGRAHAM BLVD SAN DOMINGO 2U Miles CR 2U-->4D $ 0.24 Local $ 0.71 Local $ - Local $ 4.71 Local $ 5.65 $ C00235 CR 771 SAN DOMINGO MARATHON BLVD 2U Miles CR 2U-->4D $ 0.09 Local $ 0.28 Local $ - Local $ 1.87 Local $ 2.24 $ 3.94 C00240 CR 771 MARATHON BLVD SR 776 2U Miles CR 2U-->4D $ 0.43 Local $ 1.29 Local $ - Local $ 8.60 Local $ $ C EDGEWATER DR JOWETT ST COLLINGSWOOD BLVD 2U Miles CR 2U-->4D $ 0.09 Local Committed $ 0.28 Local Committed $ 0.13 Local Committed $ 1.86 Local $ 1.86 $ 2.41 C00500 EDGEWATER DR COLLINGSWOOD BLVD PELLAM BLVD 2U Miles CR 2U-->4D $ 0.36 Local $ 1.08 Local $ 0.49 Local $ 7.21 Local $ 9.14 $ C00505 EDGEWATER DR PELLAM BLVD MIDWAY BLVD 2U Miles CR 2U-->4D $ 0.24 Local $ 0.71 Local $ 0.32 Local $ 4.77 Local $ 6.04 $ FLAMINGO BLVD (REALIGNMENT) EDGEWATER COMO ST 2U CR 2U-->4D $ 0.22 Local $ 0.65 Local $ 0.88 Local $ 4.32 Local $ 6.07 $ 7.79 C FLAMINGO BLVD COMO ST WINTERGARDEN AV 2U Miles CR 2U-->4D $ 0.32 Local 2015 $ 0.97 Local 2015 $ 1.32 Local 2015 $ 6.46 Local $ 9.07 $ C00580 FLAMINGO BLVD WINTERGARDEN AV SR 776 2U Miles CR 2U-->4D $ 0.40 Local 2015 $ 1.21 Local 2015 $ 1.65 Local 2015 $ 8.08 Local $ $ C00720 HARBORVIEW RD MELBOURN ST DATE ST 2U 1.12 Miles CR 2U-->4D $ 0.43 Developer $ 1.30 Developer $ 1.66 Developer $ 8.69 <Multiple $ $ C HARBORVIEW RD DATE ST PURDY DR 2U Miles CR 2U-->4D $ 0.26 Developer $ 0.78 Developer $ 0.98 Developer $ 5.17 <Multiple $ 7.19 $ C HARBORVIEW RD PURDY DR I-75 2U Miles CR 2U-->4D $ 0.32 Developer $ 0.96 Developer $ 1.21 Developer $ 6.37 <Multiple $ 8.86 $ C01070 N JONES LOOP BURNT STORE RD TAYLOR RD 4D Miles CR 4D-->6D $ 0.30 <Multiple C01075 N JONES LOOP TAYLOR RD I-75 4D Miles CR 4D-->6D $ 0.22 <Multiple $ 0.89 <Multiple $ 0.67 <Multiple $ 0.60 <Multiple $ 0.46 <Multiple $ 5.92 Local $ 7.71 $ $ 4.49 Local $ 5.85 $ 7.51 C01080 N JONES LOOP I-75 PIPER RD 4D 0.36 Miles CR 4D-->6D $ 0.14 Local $ 0.42 Local $ 0.29 Local $ 2.79 Local $ 3.64 $ 4.67 N JONES LOOP EXTENSION N JONES LOOP US Miles CR 00-->4D $ 0.34 Local $ 1.02 Local $ 2.53 Local $ 6.77 Local $ $ C01282 PIPER RD HENRY ST US Miles CR 00-->4D $ 1.01 Local 2015 $ 3.04 Local 2015 $ 3.79 Local $ Local $ $ C01269 RAMPART BLVD LOVELAND KINGS HWY 2U Miles CR 2U-->4D $ 0.05 Local Committed $ 0.14 Local Committed $ - Local Committed $ 0.94 Local 2015 $ 0.94 $ 1.10 C01270 RAMPART BLVD KINGS HWY RIO DE JANEIRO 2U Miles CR 2U-->4D $ 0.92 Local Committed $ 2.75 Local Committed $ 0.62 Local Committed $ Local $ $ Lane Roadway to 4 Lanes with 5' Outside QUARTER MILE C SR 31 LEE COUNTY 2U Miles Shoulder Paved (Includes milling and $ 4.86 Developer $ Developer $ - Developer $ Developer $ $ ISOLATED INT resurfacing of existing pavement) 2-Lane Roadway to 4 Lanes with 5' Outside QUARTER MILE C SR 31 CR 74 2U Miles Shoulder Paved (Includes milling and $ 0.10 Developer $ 0.29 Developer $ - Developer $ 1.95 Developer $ 2.34 $ 4.04 ISOLATED INT resurfacing of existing pavement) Page 1 of 4

33 Appendix 2A: 2015 to 2035 Cost Feasible Plan Roadway Improvements (Tier I) Table (in Millions) ID/FPN Facility From To # of Existing Lanes Project Length (Miles) Project Description PD&E (FDOT) / Planning Study (County) Cost (PDC) Funding Source Year of Expenditure Cost (PDC) PE Funding Source Year of Expenditure Cost (PDC) ROW Funding Source Year of Expenditure Cost (PDC) CST Funding Source Year of Expenditure Total Project Cost (PDC) Total Project Cost (YOE) C01365 SR 776 CRESTVIEW DR CR 775 4D Miles C01370 SR 776 CR 775 SAN CASA DR 4D Miles C01375 SR 776 SAN CASA DR ORIOLE BLVD 4D Miles C01380 SR 776 ORIOLE BLVD WINCHESTER BLVD 4D Miles C01381 SR 776 WINCHESTER BLVD WILMINGTON BLVD 4D Miles C01385 SR 776 WILMINGTON BLVD SPINNAKER BLVD 4D Miles C01390 SR 776 SPINNAKER BLVD SUNNYBROOK BLVD 4D Miles C01455 SR 776 US 41 MURDOCK CIR E 4D Miles 4-Lane Roadway to 6 Lanes (45 mph Design speed) with 5' Sidewalk, 4' Bike Lanes, and Curb & Gutter (Includes milling and resurfacing of existing pavement) 4-Lane Roadway to 6 Lanes (45 mph Design speed) with 5' Sidewalk, 4' Bike Lanes, and Curb & Gutter (Includes milling and resurfacing of existing pavement) 4-Lane Roadway to 6 Lanes (45 mph Design speed) with 5' Sidewalk, 4' Bike Lanes, and Curb & Gutter (Includes milling and resurfacing of existing pavement) 4-Lane Roadway to 6 Lanes (45 mph Design speed) with 5' Sidewalk, 4' Bike Lanes, and Curb & Gutter (Includes milling and resurfacing of existing pavement) 4-Lane Roadway to 6 Lanes (45 mph Design speed) with 5' Sidewalk, 4' Bike Lanes, and Curb & Gutter (Includes milling and resurfacing of existing pavement) 4-Lane Roadway to 6 Lanes (45 mph Design speed) with 5' Sidewalk, 4' Bike Lanes, and Curb & Gutter (Includes milling and resurfacing of existing pavement) 4-Lane Roadway to 6 Lanes (45 mph Design speed) with 5' Sidewalk, 4' Bike Lanes, and Curb & Gutter (Includes milling and resurfacing of existing pavement) 4-Lane Roadway to 6 Lanes (45 mph Design speed) with 5' Sidewalk, 4' Bike Lanes, and Curb & Gutter (Includes milling and resurfacing of existing pavement) $ 0.45 <Multiple $ 0.83 <Multiple $ 0.10 <Multiple $ 0.16 <Multiple $ 0.10 <Multiple $ 0.45 <Multiple $ 0.54 <Multiple $ 1.34 <Multiple $ 2.50 <Multiple $ 0.31 <Multiple $ 0.49 <Multiple $ 0.30 <Multiple $ 1.34 <Multiple $ 1.63 <Multiple $ 0.79 <Multiple $ 0.82 <Multiple $ 0.10 <Multiple $ 0.16 <Multiple $ - <Multiple $ - <Multiple $ - <Multiple $ 8.96 Local $ $ $ Local $ $ $ 2.08 Local $ 2.60 $ $ 3.25 Local $ 4.06 $ $ 1.97 Local $ 2.37 $ $ 8.95 Local $ $ $ Local $ $ $ 0.17 Local $ 0.50 Local $ - Local $ 3.36 Local $ 4.04 $ 5.96 C01645 TUCKER'S GRADE US 41 I-75 4D Miles CR 4D-->6D $ 0.33 Local 2015 $ 1.00 Local 2015 $ - Local 2015 $ 6.66 Local 2015 $ 7.99 $ 9.33 C US 17 COPLEY AVE REGENT RD 4D Miles 4-Lane Roadway to 6 Lanes (50mph Design Speed) with 5' Sidewalk, 6.5' Bike Lane, and Curb & Gutter with 4' Inside Shoulder Paved (Includes milling and resurfacing of existing pavement) $ 0.18 OA $ 0.53 OA OA $ 3.54 OA $ 4.24 $ Lane Roadway to 6 Lanes (50mph Design C US 17 REGENT RD Speed) with 5' Sidewalk, 6.5' Bike Lane, and GOLF COURSE 4D 0.48 Miles Curb & Gutter with 4' Inside Shoulder Paved BLVD (Includes milling and resurfacing of existing pavement) $ 0.27 OA $ 0.82 OA OA $ 5.49 OA $ 6.59 $ C US 17 GOLF COUSE BLVD CR 74 4D Miles C01740 US 41 TUCKERS GRADE NOTRE DAME BLVD 4D Miles C01890 US 41 NOTRE DAME BLVD TAYLOR RD 4D Miles C01890 US 41 NOTRE DAME BLVD TAYLOR RD 4D Miles C01885 US 41 TAYLOR RD BURNT STORE RD 4D Miles 4-Lane Roadway to 6 Lanes (50mph Design Speed) with 5' Sidewalk, 6.5' Bike Lane, and Curb & Gutter with 4' Inside Shoulder Paved (Includes milling and resurfacing of existing pavement) 4-Lane Roadway to 6 Lanes (50mph Design Speed) with 5' Sidewalk, 6.5' Bike Lane, and Curb & Gutter with 4' Inside Shoulder Paved (Includes milling and resurfacing of existing pavement) 4-Lane Roadway to 6 Lanes (50mph Design Speed) with 5' Sidewalk, 6.5' Bike Lane, and Curb & Gutter with 4' Inside Shoulder Paved (Includes milling and resurfacing of existing pavement) 4-Lane Roadway to 6 Lanes (50mph Design Speed) with 5' Sidewalk, 6.5' Bike Lane, and Curb & Gutter with 4' Inside Shoulder Paved (Includes milling and resurfacing of existing pavement) 4-Lane Roadway to 6 Lanes (50mph Design Speed) with 5' Sidewalk, 6.5' Bike Lane, and Curb & Gutter with 4' Inside Shoulder Paved (Includes milling and resurfacing of existing pavement) $ 0.11 OA $ 0.33 OA OA $ 2.21 <Multiple $ 2.65 $ 5.35 $ 0.16 OA $ 0.47 OA $ - OA $ 3.10 OA Unfunded $ 3.72 $ 0.86 $ 0.75 OA $ 2.24 OA $ - OA $ 9.06 OA $ $ $ 0.75 $ 2.24 $ - $ 5.88 OA $ 5.88 $ $ 0.91 OA $ 2.73 OA $ - OA $ 1.24 OA $ 4.88 $ 7.25 Page 2 of 4

34 Appendix 2A: 2015 to 2035 Cost Feasible Plan Roadway Improvements (Tier I) Table (in Millions) ID/FPN Facility From To # of Existing Lanes Project Length (Miles) Project Description PD&E (FDOT) / Planning Study (County) Cost (PDC) Funding Source Year of Expenditure Cost (PDC) PE Funding Source Year of Expenditure Cost (PDC) ROW Funding Source Year of Expenditure Cost (PDC) CST Funding Source Year of Expenditure Total Project Cost (PDC) Total Project Cost (YOE) C01885 US 41 TAYLOR RD BURNT STORE RD 4D Miles C01745 US 41 FLAMINGO BLVD C01745 US 41 FLAMINGO BLVD C01745 US 41 FLAMINGO BLVD SARASOTA COUNTY SARASOTA COUNTY SARASOTA COUNTY 4D 4D 4D Miles Miles Miles 4-Lane Roadway to 6 Lanes (50mph Design Speed) with 5' Sidewalk, 6.5' Bike Lane, and Curb & Gutter with 4' Inside Shoulder Paved (Includes milling and resurfacing of existing pavement) 4-Lane Roadway to 6 Lanes (50mph Design Speed) with 5' Sidewalk, 6.5' Bike Lane, and Curb & Gutter with 4' Inside Shoulder Paved (Includes milling and resurfacing of existing pavement) 4-Lane Roadway to 6 Lanes (50mph Design Speed) with 5' Sidewalk, 6.5' Bike Lane, and Curb & Gutter with 4' Inside Shoulder Paved (Includes milling and resurfacing of existing pavement) 4-Lane Roadway to 6 Lanes (50mph Design Speed) with 5' Sidewalk, 6.5' Bike Lane, and Curb & Gutter with 4' Inside Shoulder Paved (Includes milling and resurfacing of existing pavement) $ 0.91 $ 2.73 $ - $ OA $ $ $ 1.38 OA Committed $ 4.15 OA Committed $ - OA $ 3.78 OA 2015 $ 3.78 $ 4.45 $ 1.38 $ 4.15 $ - $ OA $ $ $ 1.38 $ 4.15 $ - $ 5.46 OA $ 5.46 $ 8.33 C01460 VETERANS BLVD MURDOCK CIR E COCHRAN BLVD 4D Miles CR 4D-->6D $ 0.19 Local $ 0.57 Local $ - Local $ 3.80 Local $ 4.56 $ 6.72 C01461 VETERANS BLVD COCHRAN BLVD ATWATER ST 4D Miles CR 4D-->6D $ 0.53 Local $ 1.60 Local $ - Local $ Local $ $ C00075 VETERANS BLVD ATWATER ST YORKSHIRE ST 4D Miles CR 4D-->6D $ 0.26 Local $ 0.77 Local $ - Local $ 5.11 Local $ 6.13 $ 9.04 C00080 VETERANS BLVD YORKSHIRE ST HILLSBOROUGH BLVD 4D Miles CR 4D-->6D $ 0.38 Local $ 1.13 Local $ - Local $ 7.51 Local $ 9.01 $ Page 3 of 4

35 Appendix 2A: 2015 to 2035 Cost Feasible Plan Roadway Improvements (Tier I) Table (in Millions) ID/FPN Facility From To # of Existing Lanes Project Length (Miles) Project Description PD&E (FDOT) / Planning Study (County) Cost (PDC) Funding Source Year of Expenditure Cost (PDC) PE Funding Source Year of Expenditure Cost (PDC) ROW Funding Source Year of Expenditure Cost (PDC) CST Funding Source Year of Expenditure Total Project Cost (PDC) Total Project Cost (YOE) CMS Box $ 1.30 Local $ 1.00 $ 1.30 CMS Box $ 1.53 Local $ 1.00 $ 1.53 CMS Box $ 1.80 Local $ 1.00 $ 1.80 CMS Box $ 2.11 Local $ 1.00 $ 2.11 Multi-modal Box $ 6.58 <Multiple $ 6.58 $ 8.54 Multi-modal Box $ 6.73 <Multiple $ 6.73 $ Multi-modal Box $ 7.03 <Multiple $ 7.03 $ Multi-modal Box $ 7.30 <Multiple $ 7.30 $ Total $ $ $ $ $ $ 1, Notes: $ Total cost shown is derived from a standard typical section. Costs will need to be adjusted to account for signals, bridges, or any additional item not deemed typical. 2. in millions; shown in present day costs (PDC) / "constant" 2010 dollars; 20% ratio of project cost; for Other Arterials only; 3. in millions; shown in present day costs (PDC) / "constant" 2010 dollars; 4. in millions; shown in present day costs (PDC) / "constant" 2010 dollars; include PD&E/PE, ROW and CST except for those phases that are completed, underway, or committed; 5. in millions; as shown in adopted TIP and WP; shown in year of expenditure or "current" dollars; 6. in millions; shown in year of expenditure or "current" dollars; 7. in millions; shown in 2035 year of expenditure dollars; * The cost of traffic signalization assumes the installation of mast arms on all four legs of an intersection. To obtain the cost of signalizing a four-lane roadway intersecting a two-lane roadway, divide the signal cost of a four-lane roadway by two and add this figure to the signal cost of the two-lane roadway divided by two. If a project cannot be fully funded through CST in the CFP by 2035, the PD&E/PE costs need to be included so that federal funds can be obligated. Unfunded costs for SIS and SHS is CST phase 52; LRE FY Page 4 of 4

36 Appendix 2B Long Range Transit Element 3 8

37 Appendix Table 2 B: Charlotte County Long Range Transit Element Expense Total Total (YOE) (PDC) Operating $2,741,322 $14,738,550 $16,644,605 $18,781,330 $21,197,285 $74,103,092 $50,990,037 Maint. Equip. & Upgrades $0 $72,840 $54,840 $92,820 $69,840 $290,340 $200,000 Bus Replacement (Hybrid) $0 $1,448,302 $1,635,603 $0 $2,082,978 $5,166,883 $3,579,000 Support Staff Vehicles $28,225 $30,350 $68,550 $77,350 $43,650 $248,125 $175,000 Total $2,769,547 $16,290,042 $18,403,598 $18,951,500 $23,393,753 $79,808,440 $54,944,037 Revenue Source Total Total (YOE) (PDC) Federal $2,161,252 $11,818,612 $13,701,003 $15,048,524 $18,413,003 $61,142,394 $41,916,382 State $335,945 $1,837,084 $2,129,685 $2,468,885 $2,862,114 $9,633,713 $6,599,348 Fees $163,981 $896,717 $1,039,539 $1,205,111 $1,397,050 $4,702,398 $3,221,267 Misc. (1) $108,369 $666,843 $197,517 $228,980 $721,586 $1,923,295 $1,350,644 Local Option Gas Tax $0 $1,070,786 $1,335,854 $0 $0 $2,406,640 $1,856,396 Total $2,769,547 $16,290,042 $18,403,598 $18,951,500 $23,393,753 $79,808,440 $54,944,037 (1) Includes carryover funds from FY and any subsequent years where there is a funding surplus Funding Detail (Assumes Federal funds pay for capital infrastructure, and then remaining revenues are available for operating) Operating Total Federal $2,133,027 $10,267,120 $11,942,010 $14,878,354 $16,216,535 $55,437,046 State $335,945 $1,837,084 $2,129,685 $2,468,885 $2,862,114 $9,633,713 Fees $163,981 $896,717 $1,039,539 $1,205,111 $1,397,050 $4,702,398 Misc. $108,369 $666,843 $197,517 $228,980 $721,586 $1,923,295 Local Option Gas Tax $0 $1,070,786 $1,335,854 $0 $0 $2,406,640 Total $2,741,322 $14,738,550 $16,644,605 $18,781,330 $21,197,285 $74,103,092 Maint. Equip. & Upgrades Total Federal $0 $72,840 $54,840 $92,820 $69,840 $290,340 State $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Fees $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Misc. $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Local Option Gas Tax $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total $0 $72,840 $54,840 $92,820 $69,840 $290,340 Bus Replacement (Hybrid) Total Federal $0 $1,448,302 $1,635,603 $0 $2,082,978 $5,166,883 State $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Fees $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Misc. $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Local Option Gas Tax $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total $0 $1,448,302 $1,635,603 $0 $2,082,978 $5,166,883 Support Staff Vehicles Total Federal $28,225 $30,350 $68,550 $77,350 $43,650 $248,125 State $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Fees $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Misc. $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Local Option Gas Tax $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total $28,225 $30,350 $68,550 $77,350 $43,650 $248,125 9/29/2010 G:\ Charlotte-Punta Gorda MPO LRTP\Data\Report Tables FINAL\Transit TDP Revenue Projections DRAFT

38 Charlotte County Punta Gorda MPO Harbor View Rd. Suite 4 East Port Environmental Campus Port Charlotte, FL (941)