State of California The Resources Agency DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "State of California The Resources Agency DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME"

Transcription

1 State of California The Resources Agency DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME MARINE RECREATIONAL FISHERIES STATISTICS SURVEY FOR NORTHERN AND CENTRAL CALIFORNIA, QUARTERLY REPORT NO. 26, OCTOBER TO DECEMBER 1985 Compiled by Konstantin A. Karpov MARINE RESOURCES Administrative Report No

2 State of California The Resources Agency DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME MARINE RECREATIONAL FISHERIES STATISTICS SURVEY FOR NORTHERN AND CENTRAL CALIFORNIA, QUARTERLY REPORT NO. 26,.OCTOBER TO DECEMBER 1985 Compiled by Konstantin A. Karpov MARINE RESOURCES Administrative Report No

3 ~ ~ I RECRE4TIONAL K E FISHERIES STATISTICS SLXLIEE' FOR NOF3EEFGN AND (23TRAL CALIFORNIA, QUARTERLY REPORT NO. 26, OCTOBER TO DECE'PBER / Compiled by Konstantin A. Karpov 2/ ABSTRACT Field intercept Marine Recreational Fisheries Statistics Survey (MRFSS) data for central and northern California, collected in October to December of 1985, is presented in a data report format. Data in this quarterly report are subdivided into three categories: primarily by five geographical areas; secondarily by fishing modes and gear types within each area; and finally by catch definition for each area, mode, and gear type. Tables are presented for these categories, each with three sections: sampled effort, ranked catch, and catch-per-unit,-effort (CPUE). Also, within each area, length-frequency histograms and tables are presented for select species. 1/ Narine R,esonrces Administrative Reprt No / Xarine Resources Division, So. Harbor Drive, Fort L3rag$, ('-4 CI34::T'. -

4 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We would like to thank all past and current participants in the California MRFSS who have worked together as a team to generate the data contained in this II report. Thanks are due to Arthur W. Haseltine for his enthusiastic assistance in a61 editing. Cheryl A. Avants and Patricia V. Velez for assisting in preparing the final manuscript. 9 Dr. Gordon H. Kubota and Larry Ponseggi of C.I.C. Research in San Diego who * w a* provided generous access to data tapes and their mainframe for downloading to diskettes for our microcomputer use. Stephen J. Crooke for his assistance in obtaining the data disks for the report. Special thanks are reserved to Russell Porter and PMFC, whose support in developing the program series and continued assistance throughout the project have made this report possible.

5 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS. TABLE OF CONTENTS... i ii. Study Areas. 2 Fishing Modes... 4 Gear Types... 4 Catch Definitions. 4 Computer-Generated Tables and Figures 4 Area Effort, Ranked Catch, and CPUE Tables. 7 Pier or Dock Anglers Using Hook-and-Line... 7 Jetty or Breakwater Anglers Using Hook-and-Line Beach and Bank Anglers Using Hook-and-Line Private or Rental Boat Anglers Using Hook-and-Line.. 16 Area 2.-.ae Effort, Ranked Catch, and CPUE table^...^... Pier or Dock Anglers Using Hook-and-Line... Jetty or Breakwater Anglers Using Hook-and-Line... Beach or Bank Anglers Using Hook-and-Line... Beach or Bank Anglers Using Spear. Area 2, Sub-Area e.. Effort, Ranked Catch, and CPUE Tables... Private or Rental Boat Anglers Using Hook-and-Line..

6 Table of Contents (cont'd.) Page Private or Rental Boat Anglers Using Spear CPFV Anglers Using Hook-and-Line Length-frequency Histogram Private or Rental Boat Anglers Using Hook-and-Line for Lingcod CPFV Anglers Using Hook-and-Line for Blue Rockfish.. 41 Area 2, Sub-Area Effort, Ranked Catch, and CPUE Tables Private or Rental Boat Anglers Using Hook-and-Line.. 42 CPFV Anglers Using Hook-and-Line Area Area 3 (Ocean) Effort, Ranked Catch, and CPUE Tables Pier or Dock Anglers Using Hook and Line Jetty or Breakwater Anglers Using Hook-and-Line Beach or Bank Anglers Using Hook-and-Line Privat.e or Rental Boat Anglers Using Hook-and-Line.. 57 ' CPFV Anglers Using Hook-and-Line Length-frequency Histograms Private or Rental Boat Anglers Using Hook-and-Line for Black Rockfish CPFV Anglers Using Hook-and-Line for Black Rockfish CPFV Anglers Using Hook-and-Line for Blue Rockfish.. 67 CPFV Anglers Using Hook-and-Line for Brown Rockfish CPFV Anglers Using Hook-and-Line for Canary R~ckfish. 69 CPFV Anglers Using Hook-and-Line for Yellowtail Rockfish. 70 iii

7 Table of Contents (cont'd.) - Page Area 3 (Bay) Effort, Ranked Catch, and CPUE Tables Pier or Dock Anglers Using Hook and Line Jetty or Breakwater Anglers Using Hook-and-Line Beach or Bank Anglers Using Hook-and-Line Private or Rental Boat Anglers Using Hook-and-Line.. 80 CPFV Anglers Using Rook-and-Line Area 4.m.m.m.m.m.m. 86 Effort, Ranked Catch, and CPUE mbles Pier or Dock Anglers Using Hook-and-Line Jetty or Breakwater Anglers Using Hook-and-Line Beach or Bank Anglers Using Hook-and-Line Private or Rental Boat Anglers Using Rook-and-Line.. 95 Private or Rental Boat Anglers Using Spear CPFV Anglers Using Hook-and-Line CPFV Anglers Using 108 Length-frequency Histograms Beach or Bank Anglers Using Hook-and-Line for Barred Surfperch Private or Rental Boat Anglers Using Hook-and-Line for White Croaker Private or Rental Boat Anglers Using Hook-and-Line for Blue Rockfish CPFV Anglers Using Hook-and-Line for Lingcod CPFV Anglers Using Hook-and-Line for Blue Rockfish CPFV Anglers Using Hook-and-Line for Bocaccio CPFV Anglers Using Hook-and-Line for Canary Rockfish 117

8 Table of Contents (cont'd.) Page CPFV Anglers Using Hook-and-Line for Greenspatted R~~kfi~h...o.oooo.oeoooo*o.oooo. 118 CPFV Anglers Using Hook-and-Line for Greenstriped Rockfish. 119 CPFV Anglers Using Hook-and-Line for Olive Rockfish CPFV Anglers Using Hook-and-Line for Yellowtail R~ckfish. 121 Area Effort, Ranked Catch, and CPUE Tables. 122 Pier or Dock Anglers Using Hook-and-Line Beach and Bank Anglers Using Hook-and-Line Beach and Bank Anglers Using Spear. 128 Private or Rental Boat Anglers- Using Hook-and-Line CPFV Anglers Using Hook and Line. 136 Length-frkquency Histograms,. 142 Pier or Dock Anglers Using Hook-and-Line for Jacksmelt Beach and Bank Anglers Using Hook-and-Line for Barred Surfverch. 143 Private or Rental Boat Anglers Using Hook-and-Line for Blue Rockfish. 144 Private or Rental Boat Anglers Using Hook-and-Line for Gopher.,. 145 CPFV Anglers Using Hook-and-Line for for Pacific Mackerel. 146 CPFV Anglers Using Hook-and-Line for Bocaccio CPFV Anglers Using Hook-and-Line for Widow Rockfish. 148 CPFV Anglers Using Hook-and-Line for for Yellowtail Rockfish. 149 LITERATURE CITED...e...o..oo.o**.*oo*o...e 150

9 Table of Contents (cont'd.) Page APPENDIX A - Length Frequency Tables Area 1.~.b. 151 Pier or Dock Anglers Using Hook-and-Line Jetty or Breakwater Anglers Using Hook-and-Line Beach or Bank Anglers Using Hook-and-Line Private or Rental Boat Anglers Using Hook-and-Line Area Beach or Bank Anglers Using Hook-and-Line Beach or Bank Anglers Using Spear Area 2, Sub-Area Private or Rental Boat Anglers Using Hook-and-Line Private or Rental Boat Anglers Using Spear CPFV Anglers Using Hook-and-Line Area 2, Sub-Area 097.,.e.d Private or Rental Boat Anglers Using Hook-and-Line CPFV Anglers Using Hook-and-Line Area 3.e Area 3 (O~ean)...~..~...~ Pier or Dock Anglers Using Hook-and-Line Private or Rental Boat Anglers Using Hook-and-Line CPFV Anglers Using Hook-and-Line Area 3 (Bay) Pier or Dock Anglers Using Hook-and-Line Beach or Bank Anglers Using Hook-and-Line Private or Rental Boat Anglers Using Hook-and-Line CPFV Anglers Using Hook-and-Line

10 Table of Contents (cont'd.) Page Area Pier or Dock Anglers Using Hook-an-Line Jetty or Breakwater Anglers Using Hook-and-Line Beach or Bank Anglers Using Hook-and-Line Private or Rental Boat Anglers Using Hook-and-Line Private or Rental Boat Anglers Using Spear CPFV Anglers Using Hook and Line Area 5.m.m.m. 260 Pier or Dock Anglers Using Hook-and-Line Beach or Bank Anglers Using Hook-and-Line Beach or Bank Anglers Using Spear Private or Rental Boat Anglers Using Hook-and-Line CPFV Anglers Using Hook-and-Line...O...ee APPENDIX B - List of Caught Species by Scientific and Common Name.Oe.m.e. 286

11 INTRODUCTION The California Department of Fish and Game under contract to the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) has participated in the Marine Recreational Fisheries Statistics Survey (MRFSS) from mid 1979 to the present. The survey was initiated to gather catch and effort statistics for marine recreational fisheries along the Pacific west coast. Annual summaries of these statistics have already been published on a regional basis (Current Fisheries Statistics Numbers 8321, 8323, and 8325). In these summaries, California's data is divided into two regions: Del Norte to San Luis Obispo Counties (north-central region), and Santa Barbara to San Diego Counties (southern region). This Quarterly Report No. 26 covers the period of October through December It supplements the federal annual summary for only the north-central region of California (Del Norte to San Luis Obispo Counties). This region is divided into five areas (subregions) corresponding to historical ports. Contributors to Quarterly Report No. 26 are: Area 1 (Del Norte and Humbolt Counties) Michael Wallace Area 2 (Mendocino and Sonoma Counties) Konstantin A. Karpov and Gerald S. Kwiecien Area 3 (greater San Francisco area: ocean and bay) Konstantin A. Karpov Area 4 (Santa Cruz and Monterey Counties) Diana L. Watters Area 5 (San Luis Obispo County) Nancy R. Siepel

12 METHODS Catch and length data were collected by Department biologists intercepting anglers actively fishing or in the process of leaving a fishing site. Sampling w methodology is described in part in Current Fisheries Statistics (8321, 8323, and w 8325). Data in this quarterly report are subdivided into three categories: pri- B ii4 marily by five geographical areas; secondarily by fishing modes and gear types within each area; and finally by catch definition for each area, mode, and gear type. Tables are presented for these categories, each with three sections: -v1 sampled effort, ranked catch, and catch-per-unit-effort (CPUE). Also, within each area, length-frequency histograms and tables are presented for select.p species. Study Areas Study areas range in size from one county in Area 5 to seven counties in Area 3 (Figure 1). Adjacent counties are combined whenever similarity of habitat and species composition warrants. Boat modes are segregated by county only if separate grounds were fished (i.e. Sonoma County Bodega Bay fishery, sub-area 097, from Mendocino County, sub-area 045). Area 1, including Del Norte and Humbolt counties, extends from the Oregon border to ~helt&r Cove. Both counties are combined in all mode comparisons. Area 2 contains Mendocino County and that part of Sonoma County which is north of Bodega Bay. Both counties are combined for all modes except the boat modes (privatelrental boat and CPFV). The San Francisco Area 3 is segregated into ocean and bay. This area includes anglers from six counties; Marin, Solano, Contra Costa, Alameda, San Francisco, and San Mateo. These counties encircle the bay and extend down to Ano Nuevo. Two sets of tables and figures were

13 FIGURE 1. Study area counties and sub-areas in northern and central California.

14 generated based on whether anglers specified having fished in the ocean or the bay. Bay anglers were predominantly from San Francisco Bay, but also included a small percentage of Halfmoon Bay anglers. Area 4 includes Santa Cruz County and that part of Monterey County which is north of Ragged Point. Area 5, San Luis Obispo County, extends down to Point Sal. Areas 045 and 4 were the only areas that included tables on boat divers using spear gear. Areas 2 and 5 were the only two to include tables on shore divers using spear gear. Fishing Modes Modes of fishing were organized into six categories: (i) pier or dock, (ii) jetty or breakwater, (iii) bridge or causeway, (iv) beach or bank, (v) private or rental boat, and (vi) commercial passenger fishing vessel (CPFV). Gear Types Three types of gear were used: (i) hook-and-line, (ii) spear, or (iii) net. -Spears were used only by divers. Dipnet and castnet were the only net I gears i'n active use in northern and central California. Catch Definition Catch is defined three different ways: (i) all fish captured, including fish returned dead or alive, those not available at the sampling site (i.e. filleted or given away etc.), and those available to measure; (ii) landed catch, not including fish returned dead or alive: and, (iii) the measured catch only. Fish caught but unavailable to measure were identified to the nearest taxa using the angler's description. Computer-Generated Tables and Figures The Microcomputer Program Series (MPS) was developed to generate the tables and figures used in this report. The programs were designed for flexibility and ease of use on area microcomputers. The programs allow the user to generate tables and figures for any combination of area, mode, gear, or definition of

15 catch. Data generated by these programs include: sampled effort, ranked catch, CPUE, and length-frequency data, Documentation of logic and program listings are available (Karpov, 1984). Sampled Effort Sampled effort is the same for all three catch definitons for a particular area, mode, or gear, It includes the number of anglers intercepted and the total hours fishing effort. Ranked Catch Ranked catch includes rank of species caught by number or weight, and other statistics depending on the catch definiton, Fish are ranked by number caught in two of the catch definitions: all fish caught and landed catch. The measured catch has fish ranked by weight caught. The measured catch tables include average lengths and standard deviation, and derived average weight. CPUE CPUE is calculated using two definitions of both "catch" and "effort". Catch is either number or weight (kilograms) caught, Effort is either angler days or total hours fished. CPUE, computed using weight caught as opposed to number landed, are included only for two of the catch definitions: landed catch and measured catch. Average weights incorporated in the landed catch tables are derived either from the respective measured catch table for the same species or, for the more general species groups, by calculating a group average weight. Group average weights of constituent species were calculated from this quarter's data for the same mode, gear, and area. Angler days represent completed fishing days for most areas and modes. Occasional incomplete trips were included for all modes except boat modes.

16 Length-Frequency Data Length-frequency histograms and tables were generated for select species. Histograms are included for highly abundant species where at least 10 measured fish occurred in the most frequent size interval. Histograms were summarized in either 5-, lo-, or 20-mm intervals. The criteria for assigning summary intervals was based on the largest recorded size for the species as reported in Miller and Lea (1972). Fish reported form 0 to 12 inches used 5-mm, greater than 12 to 24 inches used 10-mm and greater than 24 inches were assigned 20-mm intervals. Length-frequency tables (see Appendix A) were generated for all species with at least five measured fish for any given area, mode, and gear. Tables were summarized in 5-mm intervals and include length statistics for possible use in - ANOVA computations (Sokal and Rholf, 1969). S~ecies Names and Length-Weight Parameters Total length was recorded for all species except tuna-like fishes with rigid concave caudal fins; for these fork lengths were used. Weights were not actually measured; rather, they were determined, for all major species taken, from precal- culated length-weight relationships. The exponential relationship used was w=~l~; where a and b are constants unique to each species (Appendix 8). Scientific and common names used were standardized using the American Fisheries Society list (1980).

17 AREA 1 Table 1. Sampled Effort, Ranked Catch and C2UE for Area 1 in 1985 for Quarter 4, by Pier or Dock Anglers Using Hook-and-Line Gear. Catch Represents All Fish Captured, Both Kept and Returned. Number Anglers Intercepted - 38 Total Hours Effort for Anglers Intercepted I Common name Rank Number % by by Number Caught Number Surf perches 1 35 Seaperch, White 2 23 Greenling, Kelp 3 2 Greenlings (general) 4 1 Greenling, Rock 5 1 Sculpin, Pacific Staghorn 6 1 Perch, Shiner 7 1 Seaperch, Striped 8 1 Surfperch, Redtail Total 66 Catch per Angler Day = 1.74 CatchperAnglerHour= 0.74

18 Table 2. Sampled Effort, Ranked Catch and CPUE for Area 1 in 1985 for Quarter 4, by Pier or Dock Anglers Using Hook-and-Line Gear. Catch Represents Number Landed and Does Not Include Fish Returned Dead or Alive. Number Anglers Intercepted Total Hours Effort for Anglers Intercepted Common name Rank Number % by Mean Weight by Number Caught Number Wt.(kg)% Caught... Seaperch, White Surfperches % 0.48 Greenling, Kelp Greenling, Rock Sculpin, Pacific Staghorn Perch, Shiner % 0.00 Seaperch, Striped Surfperch, Redtail OOt% Total Catch per Angler Day = 0.82 Catch per Angler Hour = 0.35 Kg per Angler Day = 0.18 Kg per Angler Hour = 0.08 * Weight estimated from length-to-weight regression if available. *l: Mean weight for this group was not calculated or was estimated from other sources (see text).

19 AREA 1 Table 3. Sampled Effort, Ranked Catch and CPUE for Area 1 in 1985 for Quarter 4, by Pier or Dock Anglers Using Hook-and-Line Gear. Catch Represents Only the Fish Examined by the Sampler. Number Anglers Intercepted - 38 Total Hours Effort for Anglers Intercepted '---Mean---' Common name Rank Weight* Number % by No. Wt. * Ln. ** SD by Wt, Caught Caught No. Meas. (kg) (nun) LN.... Seaperch, White Greenling, Rock Greenling, Kelp Seaperch, Striped Sculpin, Pacific Staghorn Total Catch per Angler Day = 0.68 Catch per Angler Hour = 0.29 Kg peranglerday = 0.16 Kg per Angler Hour = 0.07 * Weight estimated from length-to-weight regression if available. ** Total length except for species with tuna-like caudal fins (see text). %** CPUE is underestimated if all fish taken were not examined (see text).

20 Table 4. Sampled Effort, Ranked Catch and CPUE for Area 1 in 1985 for Quarter 4, by Jetty or Breakwater Anglers Using Hook-and-Line Gear. Catch Represents All Fish Captured, Both Kept and Returned. Number Anglers Intercepted Total Hours Effort for Anglers Intercepted Comn name Rank Number %by by Number Caught Number Greenling, Kelp Rockfish, Yelloweye Rockfishes (general) Seaperch, Striped Greenlings (general) Greenling, Rock Rockfish, Black Cabezon Rockfish, Grass Sculpins Thornyhead, Shortspine Rockfish, Brown Rockfish, Blue Surfperch, Calico Wolf -eel Total C. CPUE Catch per Angler Day = 1.44 Catch per Angler Hour = 0.55

21 AREA. 1.e 5. Sampled Effort, Ranked Catch and (=PUE for Area 1 in 1985 for Quarter 4, by Jetty or Breakwater Anglel:s Using Hook-and-Line Gear. Catch Represents Number Landed and Does Not Include Fish Returned Dead or Alive. Number Anglers Intercepted Total Hours Effort for Anglers Intercepted Common name Rank Number % by Mean Weight by Number Caught Number Wt.(kg)* Caught Rockfish, Yelloweye Greenling, Kelp Seaperch, Striped Greenling, Rock Rockfishes (general) Rockfish, Black Greenlings (general) Cabezon Rockfish, Grass Thornyhead, Shortspine Rockfish, Blue Surfperch, Calico Wolf -eel Total Catch per Angler Day = 1.14 Catch per Angler Hour = 0.43 Kg per Angler Day = 0.42 Kg per Angler Hour = 0.16 * Weight estimated from length-to-weight regression if available. X* Mean weight for this group wks not calculated or was estimated from other sources (see text).

22 Table 6. Sampled Effort, Ranked Catch and CPUE for Area 1 in 1985 for Quarter 4, by Jetty or Breakwater Anglers Using Hook-and-Line Gear. Catch Represents Only the Fish Examined by the Sampler. Number Anglers Intercepted Total Hours Effort for Anglers Intercepted I---Mean---' Common name Rank Weight* Number %by No. Wt.* Ln.** SD by Wt. Caught Caught No. Meas. (kg) (mm)... LN. Wolf -eel Greenling, Kelp Seaperch, Striped Rockfish, Grass Greenling, Rock Cabezon Rockfish, Yelloweye Rockfish, Black Surfperch, Calico Total Catch per Angler Day = 0.75 Catch per Angler Hour 0.29 Kg per Angler Day = 0.33 Kg peranglerhour = 0.13 * Weight estimated from length-to-weight regression if available. a* Total length except for species with tuna-like caudal fins (see text). 88% CPUE is underestimated if all fish taken were not examined (see text).

23 Table 7. Sampled Effort, Ranked Catch and CPUE for.area 1 in 1985 for Quarter 4, by Beach or Bank Anglers Using Hook-and-Line Gear. Catch Represents All Fish Captured, Both Kept and Returned. Number Anglers Intercepted Total Hours Effort for Anglers Intercepted Comn name Rank Number % by by Number Caught Number... Greenling, Kelp Trout, Rainbow Greenlings (general) Salmon, Chinook (King) Sculpins Trouts Seaperch, Striped Salmon, Coho (Silver) Greenling, Rock Sculpin, Pacific Staghorn Cabezon Surfperches Surfperch, Redtail Trout, Cutthroat Pricklebacks Total C. CPUE Catch per Angler Day = 0.78 Catch per Angler Hour = 0.27

24 Table 8. Sampled Effort, Ranked Catch and CPUE for Area 1 in 1985 for Quarter 4, by Beach or Bank Anglers Using Hook-and-Line Gear, Catch Represents Number Landed and Does Not Include Fish Returned Dead or Alive. A, Sampled Effort Number Anglers Intercepted 128 Total Hours Effort for Anglers Intercepted Common name Rank Number % by Mean Weight by Number Caught Nmber Wt.(kg)J: Caught Greenling, Kelp Trout, Rainbow Salmon, Chinook (King) Seaperch, Striped Salmon, Coho (Silver) Greenling, Rock Sculpin, Pacific Staghorn Cabezon Surfperches Surfperch, Redtail Trout, Cutthroat... Total Catch per Angler Day = 0.50 Catch per Angler Hour = 0.17 Kg per Angler Day = 0.31 Kg per Angler Hour = 0.11 J: Weight estimated from length-to-weight regression if available. *l: Mean weight for this group was not calculated or was estimated from other sources (see text).

25 Table 9. Sampled Effort, Ranked Catch and CPUE for Area 1 in 1985 for Quarter 3, by Beach or Bank Anglers Using Hook-and-Line Gear. Catch Represents Only the Fish Examined by the Sampler. ~r Number Anglers Intercepted Total Hours Effort for Anglers Intercepted :---Mean---' Common name Rank Weight* Number % by No. Wt. * Ln. ** SD bywt. Caught Caught No. Meas. (kg) (mm) M. (I Salmon, Coho (Silver) Salmon, Chinook (King) Trout, Rainbow Greenling, Kelp Surfperch, Redtail Cabezon Seaperch, Striped Greenling, Rock Trout, Cutthroat Sculpin, Pacific Staghorn Surf perches Total Catch per Angler Day = 0.49 Catch per Angler Hour = 0.17 Kg peranglerday = 0.31 Kg per Angler Hour = 0.11 * Weight estimated from length-to-weight regression if available. 8% Total length except for species with tuna-like caudal fins (see text). *** CPUE is underestimated. if all fish taken were not examined (see text).

26 Table 10. Sampled Effort, Ranked Catch and CPUE for Area 1 in 1985 for Qusrter 4, by Private or Rental Boat Anglers Using iiook-and-line Gear. Catch Represents All Fish Captured, Both Kept and Returned. Wmber Anglers Intercepted Total Hours Effort for Anglers Intercepted Common name Rank by Number... Rockfish, Black 1 Salmon, Chinook (King) 2 Trout, Rainbow 3 Rockfish, Yellowtail 4 Rockfish, Blue 5 Rockfish, Canary 6 Seaperch, Striped 7 Rockfish, Yelloweye 8 Rockfish, Copper 9 Salmon, Coho (Silver) 10 Lingcod 11 Salmon 12 Trout, Cutthroat 13.Sticklebacks 14 Rockfish, Quillback 15 Treef ish 16 Greenling, Rock 17 Surfperches 18 Surfperch, Redtail 19 Flounder, Starry 20 Number Caught % by Number Total Catch per Angler Day = 1.01 Catch per Angler Hour = 0.26

27 Table 11. Sampled Effort, Ranked Catch and CPUE for Area 1 in 1985 for Quarter 4, by Private or Rental Boat Anglers Using Hook-and-Line Gear. Catch Represents Number Landed and Does Not Include Fish Returned Dead or Alive. Number Anglers Intercepted Total Hours Effort for Anglers Intercepted Common name Rank Number %by Mean Weight by Number Caught Number Wt. (kg)'* Caught... Rockfish, Black Salmon, Chinook (King) Trout, Rainbow Rockfish, Yellowtail Rockfish, Blue Rockfish, Canary Seaperch, Striped Rockfish, Yelloweye Rockfish, Copper Salmon, Coho (Silver) Lingcod Salmon ** 1.72 Trout, Cutthroat Rockfish, Quillback Treef ish Greenling, Rock Surfperch, Redtail Flounder, Starry Total Catch per Angler Day = 0.96 Catch per Angler Hour = 0.25 Kg per Angler Day = 1.14 Kg per Angler Hour = 0.29 * Weight estimated from length-to-weight regression if available. *X Mean weight for this group was not ca1.culated or was estimated from other sources (see text).

28 Table 12. Sampled Effort, Ranked Catch and CPUE for Area 1 in 1985 for Quarter 4, by Private or Rental Boat Anglers Using Hook-and-Line Gear. Catch Represents Only the Fish Examined by the Sampler. Number Anglers Intercepted Total Hours Effort for Anglers Intercepted :---&an---' Common name Rank Weight* Number %by No. Wt.* Ln.** SD by Wt. Caught Caught No. Meas. (kg) (mm) LN.... Salmon, Chinook (King) Lingcod Rockfish, Black Trout, Rainbow Rockfish, Yelloweye Rockfish, Canary Rockfish, Copper Rockfish, Blue Rockfish, Yellowtail Salmon, Coho (Silver) Rockfish, Quillback Seaperch, Striped Flounder, Starry Treef ish Surfperch, Redtail Trout, Cutthroat Greenling, Rock Total Catch per Angler Day = 0.86 Catch per Angler Hour = 0.22 Kg per Angler Day = 1.06 Kg peranglerhour = 0.27 * Weight estimated from length-to-weight regression if available. ** Total length except for species with tuna-like caudal fins (see text). *** CWE is underestimated if all fish taken were not examined (see text.).

29 .e 13. Sampled Effort, Ftanked Catch and CPUE for Area 2 in 1985 for Quarter 4, by Pier or Dock Anglers Using Hook-and-Line Gear. Catch Represents All Fish Captured, Both Kept and Returned. Number Anglers Intercepted - 7 Total Hours Effort for Anglers Intercepted Connnon name Rank Number %by by Number Caught Number... Seaperch, White 1 2 % Total Catch per Angler Day 0.29 Catch per Angler Hour = 0.13

30 AREA 2 *TCi Q( and Table 14. Sampled Effort, Ranked Catch and CEW for Area 2 in 1985 for Quarter 4, by Pier or Dock Anglers Using Hook-and-Line Gear. Catch Represents Number Landed Does Not Include Fish Returned Dead or Alive. a S 112 Number Anglers Intercepted 7 Total Hours Effort for Anglers Intercepted ;9 uu Common name Rank Number % by Mean Weight by Number Caught Number Wt.(kg)* Caught Seaperch, White 1 2 % Total Catch per Angler Day = 0.29 Catch per Angler Hour = 0.13 Kg per Angler Day = 0.06 Kg per Angler Hour = 0.03 % Weight estimated from length-to-weight regression if available.

31 Table 15. Sampled Effort, Rarked Catch and CWE for Area 2 in 1985 for Quarter 4, by Pier or Dock Anglers Using Hook-and-Line Gear. Catch Represents Only the Fish Examined by the Sampler. r01 Number Anglers Intercepted - 7 Total Hours Effort for Anglers Intercepted B, Ranked Catch Common name!---me=---' Rank Weight* Number %by No. Wt.* Ln.** SD bywt. Caught Caught No. Meas. (kg) (mm) LN. QI UY Seaperch, White % Total Catch per Angler Day = 0.29 Catch per Angler Hour = 0.13 Kg per Angler Day = 0.06 U per Angler Hour = 0.03 * Weight estimated from length-to-weight regression if available. ** Total lemth except for species with tuna-like caudal fins (see text). 88% CWJE is underestimated if all fish taken were not examined (see text).

32 Table 16. Sampled Effort, Ranked Catch and CPUE for Area 2 in 1985 for Quarter 4, by Jetty or Breakwater Anglers Using Hook-and-Line Gear. Catch Represents All Fish Captured, Both Kept and Returned. Number Anglers Intercepted - 77 Total Hours Effort for Anglers Intercepted Common name Rank Number %by by Number Caught Number Sculpin, Pacific Staghorn Flounder, Starry Sculpins Sculpin, Buffalo Greenling, Rock Cabezon Sharks Greenlings (general) Surfperch, Redtail Sole, Sand... Total C. CPfJE Catch per Angler Day = 0.57 Catch per Angler Hour = 0.26

33 Table 17. Sampled Effort, Ranloxi Catch and CPUE for Area 2 in 1985 for Quarter 4, by Jetty or Breakwater Anglers Using Hook-and-Line Gear. Catch Represents Number Landed and Does Not Include Fish Returned Dead or Alive. Number Anglers Intercepted - 77 Total Hours Effort for Anglers Intercepted Common name Rank Number % by Mean Weight by Number Caught Nmber Wt.(kg)* Caught... Flounder, Starry Sculpin, Buffalo Greenling, Rock Cabezon Sole, Sand Total Catch per Angler Day = 0.16 Catch per Angler Hour = 0.07 Kg per Angler Day = 0.06 Kg per Angler Hour = 0.03 r: Weight estimated from length-to-weight regression if available.

34 AREA 2 Table 18. Sampled Effort, W ed Catch and CfST for Area 2 in 1985 for Quarter 4, by Jetty or Breakwater Anglers Using Hook-and-Line Gear. Catch Represents Only the Fish Examined by the Sampler. Number Anglers Intercepted Total Hours Effort for Anglers Intercepted :---Mean---' Common name Rank Weight* Number % by No. Wt. * Ln. ** SD bywt. Caught Caught No. Meas. (kg) (mm) LN.... Flounder, Starry Cabezon Sculpin, Buffalo Greenling, Rock Sole, Sand Total CatchperAnglerDay = 0.16 Catch per Angler Hour = 0.07 Kg per Angler Day = 0.06 Kg per Angler Hour = 0.03 * Weight estimated from length-to-weight regression if available. t* Total length except for species with tuna-like caudal fins (see text). *** CPUE is underestimated if all fish taken were not examined (see text).

35 AREA 2 'Table 19. Sampled Effort, Ranked Catch and CPUE for Area 2 in 1985 for Quarter 4, by Beach or Bank Anglers Using Hook-and-Line Gear. Catch Represents All Fish Captured, Both Kept and Returned. Number Anglers Intercepted Total Hours Effort for Anglers Intercepted B. Ranked Catch Common name Rank Number % by by Number Caught Number Greenling, Rock Seaperch., Striped Greenling, Kelp Surf perches Rockfishes (general) Lingcod Total Catch per Angler Day = 0.28 Catch per Angler Hour = 0.14

36 Table 20. Sampled Effort, Ranked Catch and CPUE for Area 2 in 1985 for Quarter 4, by Beach or Bank Anglers Using Hook-and-Line Gear. Catch Represents Number Landed and Does Not Include Fish Returned Dead or Alive. Number Anglers Intercepted - 64 Total Hours Effort for Anglers Intercepted Cormon name Rank Number % by Mean Weight by Number Caught Number Wt.(kg)* Caught... Greenling, Rock Seaperch, Striped Greenling, Kelp Surfperches ** 1.89 Rockfishes (general) Total Catch per Angler Day = 0.27 Catch per Angler Hour 0.13 Kg peranglerday = 0.12 Kg per Angler Hour = 0.06 * Weight estimated from length-to-weight regression if available. ** Mean weight for this group was not calculated or was estimated from other sources (see text).

37 Table 21. Sampled Effort, Ranked Catch and CPUE for Area 2 in 1985 for Quarter 4, by Beach or Bank Anglers Using Hook-and-Line Gear, Catch Represents Only the Fish Examined by the Sampler. Number Anglers Intercepted Total Hours Effort for Anglers Intercepted Common name (---Mean---' Rank Weight* Number %by No. Wt.8 h,** SD bywt. Caught Caught No. Meas. (kg) (mm) LN Seaperch, Striped Greenling, Kelp Greenling, Rock Rockfishes (general) Total Catch per Angler Day = 0.22 Catch per Angler Hour = 0.11 Kg per Angler Day = ' 0.09 Kg. per Angler Hour = : Weight estimated from length-to-weight regression if available. * Total length except for species with tuna-like caudal fins (see text).. *** CPUE is underestimated if all fish taken were not examined (see text).

38 AREA 2 Table 22. Sampled Effort, Ranked Catch and CPUE for Area 2 in 1985 for Quarter 4, by Beach or Bank Anglers Using Spear Gear. Catch Represents All Fish Captured, Both Kept and Returned, Number Anglers Intercepted - 36 Total Hours Effort for Anglers Intercepted Common name Rank Number %by by Number Caught Number... Rockfish, Blue Rockfish, Black Lingcod Rockfish, Canary Rockfishes (general) Rockfish, Kelp Rockfish, Yellowtail Rockfish, Vermilion Rockfish, Black-and-yellow Greenling, Kelp Total no Catch per Angler Day = 1.06 Catch per Angler Hour = 1.07

39 AREA 2 Table 23. Sampled Effort, Ranked Catch and CPUE for Area 2 in 1985 for Quarter 4, by Beach or Bank Anglers Usirg Spear Gear. Catch Represents Number Landed and Does Not Include Fish Returned Dead or Alive. Number Anglers Intercepted - 36 Total Hours Effort for Anglers Intercepted Common name Rank Number % by Mean Weight by Number Caught Number Wt.(kg)* Caught Rockfish, Blue Rockfish, Black Lingcod Rockfish, Canary Rockfish, Kelp Rockfish, Yellowtail Rockfish, Vermilion Rockfish, Black-and-yellow Greenling, Kelp Total Catch per Angler Day = 1.00 Catch per Angler Hour = 1.01 Kg per Angler Day = 0.68 Kg per Angler Hour = 0.69 % Weight estimated from length-to-weight regression if available.

40 Table 24. Sampled Effort, Ranked Catch and CPUE for.area 2 in 1985 for Quarter 4, by Beach or Bank Anglers Using Spear Gear. Catch Represents Only the Fish aamined by the Sampler. Number Anglers Intercepted Total Hours Effort for Anglers Intercepted Comn name :---Mean---' Rank Weight% Number %by No. Wt.% Ln.** SD by Wt. Caught Caught No. Meas. (kg) (mm) LN. Lingcod Rockfish, Blue Rockfish, Black Rockfish, Kelp Rockfish, Canary Rockfish, Vermilion Rockfish, Black-and-yellow Greenling, Kelp Rockfish, Yellowtail Total Catch per Angler Day = 1.00 Catch per Angler Hour = 1.01 Kg per Angler Day = 0.68 Kg peranglerhour = : Weight estimated from length-to-weight regression if available. t* Total length except for species with tuna-like caudal fins (see text). tt* CRIE is underestimated if all fish taken were not examined (see text).

41 Table 25. Sampled Effort, Ranked Catch and CPUE for Area 045 in 1985 for Quarter 4, by Private or Rental Boat Anglers Using Hook-and-Line Gear. Catch Represents All Fish Captured, Both Kept and Returned. Number Anglers Intercepted Total Hours Effort for Anglers Intercepted Common name Rank Number % by by Number Caught Number Lingcod 1 Sanddab, Pacific 2 Rockfish, Canary 3 Rockfish, Black 4 Rockfish, Blue 5 Rockfish, Widow 6 Rockfish, China 7 Rockfishes (general) 8 Rockfish, Vermilion 9 Rockfish, Yellowtail 10 Rockfish, Copper 11 Rockfish, Yelloweye 12 Cabezon 13 Salmon, Coho (Silver). 14 Rockfish, Rosy 15 Salmon, Chinook (King) 16 Greenling, Kelp 17 Sole, Rock 18 Sole, Sand 19 Spiny Dogfish 20 Mackerel, Pacific (Chub) Total Catch per Angler Day = 2.43 Catch per Angler Hour = 0.57

42 AREA 045 Table 26. Sampled Effort, Ranked Catch and CPUE for Area 045 in 1985 for Quarter 4, by Private or Rental Boat Anglers Using Hook-and-Line Gear. Catch Represents Number Landed and Does Not Include Fish Returned Dead or Alive. Number Anglers Intercepted Total Hours Effort for Anglers Intercepted Common name Lingcod Sanddab, Pacific Rockfish, Canary Rockfish, Black Rockfish, Blue Rockfish, Widow Rockfish, China Rockfish, Vermilion Rockfish, Yellowtail Rockfish, Copper Rockfish, Yelloweye Cabezon Salmon, Coho (Silver) Rockfish, Rosy Salmon, Chinook (King) Greenling, Kelp Sole, Rock Sole, Sand Spiny Dogfish Mackerel, Pacific (Chub) Rank Number by Number Caught, % by Mean Number Wt.(kg)* : Weight Caught Total Catch per Angler Day = 2.28 Catch per Angler Hour = 0.54 Kg per Angler Day = 3.44 Kg per Angler Hour = 0.81 % Weight estimated from length-to-weight regression if available.

43 AREA 045 Table 27. Sampled Effort, Ranked Catch and CPUE for Area 045 in 1985 for Quarter 4, by Private or Rental Boat Anglers Using Hook-and-Line Gear. Catch Represents Only the Fish Examined by the Sampler. Number Anglers Intercepted Total Hours Effort for Anglers Intercepted Common name Lingcod Rockfish, Canary Rockfish, Vermilion Rockfish, Black Rockfish, Blue Rockfish, Yelloweye Rockfish, Copper Cabezon Rockfish, Widow Rockfish, China Salmon, Chinook (King) Sanddab, Pacific Salmon, - Coho (Silver) Rockfish, Yellowtail Spiny Dogfish Rockfish, Rosy Sole, Rock Greenling, Kelp Mackerel, Pacific (Chub) Sole, Sand Rank Weight* Number by Wt. Caught Caught % by No :---Mean---' No. Wt.* Ln.** SD Meas. (kg) (mm) LN., Total Catch per Angler Day = 2.28 Catch per Angler Hour = 0.54 Kg per Angler Day = 3.44 Kg per Angler Hour = 0.81 t Weight estimated from length-to-weight regression if avail~ible. ** Total length except for species with tuna-like caudal fins (see text). *** CFUE is underestimated if all fish taken were not examined (see test).

44 Table 28. Sampled Effort, Ranked Catch and CPUE for Area 045 in 1985 for Quarter 4, by Private or Rental Boat Anglers Using Spear Gear. Catch Represents All Fish Captured, Both Kept and Returned. Number Anglers Intercepted - 14 Total Hours Effort for Anglers Intercepted Comn name Rank Number %by by Number Caught Number... Rockfish, Black Rockfish, Blue Lingcod Rockfish, China Seaperch, Striped Perch, Pile Total CatchperAnglerDay = 5.36 Catch per Angler Hour = 7.50

45 Table 29. Sampled Effort, Ranked Catch and CPUE for Area 045 in 1985 for Quarter 4, by Private or Rental Boat Anglers Using Spear Gear. Catch Represents Number Landed and Does Not Include Fish Returned Dead or Alive. Number Anglers Intercepted - 14 Total Hours Effort for Anglers Intercepted Common name Rank Number % by Mean Weight by Number Caught Number Wt.(kg)* Caught Rockfish, Black Rockfish, Blue Lingcod Rockfish, China Seaperch, Striped Perch, Pile Total Catch per Angler Day = 5.36 Catch per Angler Hour = 7.50 Kg per Angler Day = 5.99 Kg peranglerhour = 8.38 % Weight estimated from length-to-weight regression if available.

46 AREA 045 Table 30, Sampled Effort, Ranked Catch and CPLTE for Area 045 in 1985 for Quarter 4, by Private or Rental Boat Anglers Using Spear Gear. Catch Represents Only the Fish Examined by the Sampler. Number Anglers Intercepted - 14 Total Hours Effort for Anglers Intercepted Common name Rank Weight * Number by Wt. Caught Caught... Rockfish, Black Lingcod Rockfish, Blue Rockfish, China Seaperch, Striped Perch, Pile Total % by No. No. Meas. C. CPUE*** Catch per Angler Day = 5.36 CatchperAnglerHour= 7.50 Kg per Angler Day = 5.99 Kg per Angler Hour = 8.38 * Weight estimated from length-to-weight regression if available. *l: Total length except for species with tuna-like caudal fins (see text). *t* CT-SJE: is underestimated if all fish taken were not examined (see text).

47 AREA 045 Table 31. Sampled Effort, Ranked Catch and CPUE for Plrea 045 in 1985 for Quarter 4, by All CPEV Anglers Using Hook-and-Line Gear. Catch Represents All Fish Captured, Both Kept and Returned. C (Is- Llr Number Anglers Intercepted - 26 Total Hours Effort for Anglers Intercepted B, Ranked Catch Rockfish, Blue Sanddab, Pacific Rockfish, Canary Rockfish, Greenstriped Rockfish, Widow Rockfish, Yellowtail Lingcod Rockfish, Greenspotted Rockfish, Rosy Rockfish, Yelloweye Salmon, Chinook (King) Rockfishes (general) Salmon, Pink Rockfish, Copper Rockfish, Quillback Rank Number % by by Number Caught Number Total C. CF'm Catch per Angler Day = 9.19 Catch per Angler Hour = 2.30

48 Table 32. Sampled Effort, Ranked Catch and CWE for Area 045 in 1985 for Quarter 4, by All CPFV Anglers Using Hook-and-Line Gear. Catch Represents Number Landed and Does Not Include Fish Returned Dead or Alive. Number Anglers Intercepted - 26 Total Hours Effort for Anglers Intercepted Common name Rark Number % by Mean by Number Caught Number Wt.(kg)* Weight Caught , Rockfish, Blue Sanddab, Pac i f ic Rockfish, Canary Rockfish, Greenstriped Rockfish, Widow Rockfish, Yellowtail Lingcod Rockfish, Greenspotted Rockfish, Rosy Rockfish, Yelloweye Salmon, Chinook (King) Rockfishes (general) Salmon, Pink , Rockfish, Copper Rockfish, Quillback Total Catch per Angler Day = 9.19 Catch per Angler Hour = 2.30 Kg peranglerday = 6.63 Kg per Angler Hour = 1.66 * Weight estimated from length-to-weight regression if available. t% Mean weight for this group was not calculated or was estimated from other sources (see text).

49 -e 33. Sampled Effort, Ranked Catch and CPC'E for Area 045 in 1985 for Quarter 4, by All CPFV Anglers Using Hook-and-Line Gear. Catch Represents Only the Fish Examined by the Sampler. Number Anglers Intercepted - 26 Total Hours Effort for Anglers Intercepted I---Mean---' Common name Rank Weight* Number % by No. Wt. * Ln. ** SD by Wt. Caught Caught No. Meas. (kg) (rnm) LN.... Lingcod Rockfish, Blue Rockfish, Canary Rockfish, Yellowtail Rockfish, Yelloweye Rockfish, Widow Sanddab, Pacific Rockfish, Greenstriped Rockfish, Greenspotted Salmon, Chinook (King) Rockfish, Copper Rockfish, Quillback Rockfish, Rosy ISS Salmon, Pink Total ID.re, Catch per Angler Day = 9.12 Catch per Angler Hour = 2.28 Kg per Angler Day = 6.58 Kg peranglerhour = 1.65 * Weight estimated from length-to-weight regression if available. ** Total length except for species with tuna-like caudal fins (see text). *** CPUE is underestimated if all fish taken were not examined (see text).

50 AREA 045 Figure 2. Length-Frequency Histogram for Lingcod Taken by Private or Rental Boat Anglers Using Hook-and-Line Gear. Area 045, Quarter 4, ~ b ~ H ~ ~ H B - - H b ~ H - H + H - ~ H Length N= 77 Mean= 698mm Limits (mm)

51 Figure 3. Length-Frequency Histogram for Blue Rockfish Taken by All CPFV Anglers Using Hook-and-Line Gear. Area 045, Quarter 4, n - - n ~ m + - ~ n - m m - ~ ~ + - ~ m - - a e - m Length N= 83 Mean= 331m Limits(mm)

52 Table 34. Sampled Effort, Ranked Catch and CPLT for Area 097 in 1985 for Quarter 4, by Private or Rental Boat Anglers Using Hook-and-Line Gear. Catch Represents All Fish Captured, Both Kept and Returned. Number Anglers Intercepted - 44 Total Hours Effort for Anglers Intercepted Common m e Rank Number % by by Number Caught Number... Sculpin, Pacific Staghorn Rockfish, Brown Rockfish, Black Lingcod Rockfish, Yellowtail Rockfish, Canary Rockfish, Copper Rockfish, Blue Rockfishes (general) Rockfish, Kelp Rockfish, Starry Bass, Striped Salmon, Chinook (King) Rockfish, Quillback Rockfish, Greenblotched Flounders, Righteye Total Catch per Angler Day = 4.02 Catch per Angler Hour = 0.77

53 Table 35. Sampled Effort, Ranked Catch and CPLZ for Area 097 in 1985 for Quarter 4, by Private or Rental Boat Anglers Using Hook-and-Line Gear. Catch Represents Number Landed and Does Not Include Fish Returned Dead or Alive. Nwnber Anglers Intercepted Total Hours Effort for Anglers Intercepted B. Ranked Catch Common name Rank Number % by Mean Weight by Number Caught Number Wt.(kg)t Caught... Rockfish, Brown Rockfish, Black Lingcod Rockfish, Yellowtail Rockfish, Canary Rockfish, Copper Rockfish, Blue Rockfish, Kelp Rockfish, Starry Salmon, Chinook (King) Rockfish, Quillback Rockfish, Greenblotched Bass, Striped Total Catch per Angler Day = 2.70 Catch per Angler Hour = 0.52 Kg per Angler Day = 3.75 Kg per Angler Hour = 0.72 * Weight estimated from length-to-weight regression if available.

54 Table 36. Sampled Effort, Ranked Catch and CPCE for Area 097 in 1985 for Quarter 4, by Private or Rental Boat Anglers Using Hook-and-Line Gear. Catch Represents Only the Fish Examined by the Sampler. Number Anglers Intercepted Total Hours Effort for Anglers Intercepted Common name '---Mean---' Rank Weight* Number %by No. Wt.* Ln.** SD by Wt. Caught Caught No. Meas. (kg) (mm) I.&.... Lingcod Rockfish, Brown Rockfish, Black Rockfish, Yellowtail Rockfish, Copper Rockfish, Canary Rockfish, Blue Rockfish, Kelp Rockfish, Starry Salmon, Chinook (King) Rockfish, Greenblotched * Rockfish, Quillback ' R Bass, S.t;riped Total Q. Catch per Angler Day = 2.70 Catch per Angler Hour = 0.52 Kg per Angler Day = 3.75 Kg per Angler Hour. = 0.72 * Weight estimated from length-to-weight regression if available. * Total length except for species with tuna-like caudal fins (see text). *** CPUE is underestimated if all fish taken were not examined (see text).

APPENDIX L Species Composition of Fish, Shrimp, and Crabs Collected by the California Department of Fish and Game Fishery Surveys from South Bay

APPENDIX L Species Composition of Fish, Shrimp, and Crabs Collected by the California Department of Fish and Game Fishery Surveys from South Bay APPENDIX L Species Composition of Fish, Shrimp, and Crabs Collected by the California Department of Fish and Game Fishery Surveys from South Bay Introduction California Department of Fish and Game (Baxter

More information

= new from the previous year = deleted from the previous year

= new from the previous year = deleted from the previous year Summarized History of Oregon Marine Sport Fishing Regulations - Page 1 of 12 2017 Descending devices are mandatory. Any vessel fishing for, or possessing, bottomfish (groundfish) in the ocean must have

More information

QUARTERLY REFfXT NO. 19,

QUARTERLY REFfXT NO. 19, State of California The Resources Agency DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME MARINE ~ T I O N A FISHERIES C STATISTICS SURVM FOR NOKI'HERN AND CEMaAL CALIFOfZNIA, QUARTERLY REFfXT NO. 19, JANUARY TO MARCH, 1984

More information

MPA Baseline Program. Annual Progress Report. Year 1; 1 Feb Jan. 2015

MPA Baseline Program. Annual Progress Report. Year 1; 1 Feb Jan. 2015 MPA Baseline Program Annual Progress Report Principal Investigators - please use this form to submit your MPA Baseline Program project annual report, including an update on activities completed over the

More information

Management under the Highly Migratory Species Fishery Management Plan

Management under the Highly Migratory Species Fishery Management Plan Agenda Item G.4.b CDFW Report 1 September 2014 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE REPORT ON BAG REDUCTION OPTIONS FOR THE RECREATIONAL TAKE OF PACIFIC BLUEFIN TUNA Introduction At the June 2014

More information

Socioeconomic Profile and Spatial Analysis of Fisheries in the three central California National Marine Sanctuaries

Socioeconomic Profile and Spatial Analysis of Fisheries in the three central California National Marine Sanctuaries Socioeconomic Profile and Spatial Analysis of Fisheries in the three central California National Marine Sanctuaries Overview and Assessment of CDFG Fisheries Data for use in the Joint Management Plan Review

More information

Groundfish Harvest Specifications and Management Measures. Tillamook August 6 Newport August 7 Brookings August 12 North Bend August 13

Groundfish Harvest Specifications and Management Measures. Tillamook August 6 Newport August 7 Brookings August 12 North Bend August 13 2015-16 Groundfish Harvest Specifications and Management Measures Tillamook August 6 Newport August 7 Brookings August 12 North Bend August 13 1 (SSC) Scientific and Statistical Committee Groundfish Management

More information

2016 OREGON SPORT OCEAN REGULATIONS FOR SALMON, HALIBUT, AND OTHER MARINE SPECIES

2016 OREGON SPORT OCEAN REGULATIONS FOR SALMON, HALIBUT, AND OTHER MARINE SPECIES 2016 OREGON SPORT OCEAN REGULATIONS FOR SALMON, HALIBUT, AND OTHER MARINE SPECIES This information supersedes information listed in the 2016 Oregon Sport Fishing Regulations pamphlet Note: Regulations

More information

Commercial Fisheries in the South Coast s Marine Protected Areas

Commercial Fisheries in the South Coast s Marine Protected Areas STATE OF THE CALIFORNIA SOUTH COAST SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT COMMERCIAL FISHERIES Researchers from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) used landings data from CDFW s Commercial Fisheries Information

More information

MPA Baseline Program. Annual Progress Report. Year 2; 1 Feb Jan. 2016

MPA Baseline Program. Annual Progress Report. Year 2; 1 Feb Jan. 2016 MPA Baseline Program Annual Progress Report Principal Investigators - please use this form to submit your MPA Baseline Program project annual report, including an update on activities completed over the

More information

2017 OREGON SPORT OCEAN REGULATIONS FOR SALMON, HALIBUT, AND OTHER MARINE SPECIES

2017 OREGON SPORT OCEAN REGULATIONS FOR SALMON, HALIBUT, AND OTHER MARINE SPECIES 2017 OREGON SPORT OCEAN REGULATIONS FOR SALMON, HALIBUT, AND OTHER MARINE SPECIES This information supersedes information listed in the 2017 Oregon Sport Fishing Regulations pamphlet Note: Regulations

More information

2017 OREGON SPORT OCEAN REGULATIONS FOR SALMON, HALIBUT, AND OTHER MARINE SPECIES

2017 OREGON SPORT OCEAN REGULATIONS FOR SALMON, HALIBUT, AND OTHER MARINE SPECIES 2017 OREGON SPORT OCEAN REGULATIONS FOR SALMON, HALIBUT, AND OTHER MARINE SPECIES This information supersedes information listed in the 2017 Oregon Sport Fishing Regulations pamphlet Note: Regulations

More information

The U.S. West Coast Groundfish Bottom Trawl Survey

The U.S. West Coast Groundfish Bottom Trawl Survey The U.S. West Coast Groundfish Bottom Trawl Survey Northwest Fisheries Science Center Fisheries Resource Analysis and Monitoring Division NOAA, 2725 Montlake Blvd. E, Seattle, WA, 98112, U.S.A. Survey

More information

Report on the Fish, Shrimp, and Crab Sampling in the San Francisco Estuary, California

Report on the Fish, Shrimp, and Crab Sampling in the San Francisco Estuary, California title creator Subject Description Coverage Report on the 1980-1995 Fish, Shrimp, and Crab Sampling in the San Francisco Estuary, California James Orsi biological resources, ecology, ecosystem, estuary,

More information

WEST COAST FISHERIES AND MANAGEMENT

WEST COAST FISHERIES AND MANAGEMENT WEST COAST FISHERIES AND MANAGEMENT Olympic Coast National Marine Sanctuary Advisory Council May 20, 2016 Heather Reed - WDFW Jessi Doerpinghaus - WDFW FISHING IS KEY TO WASHINGTON S ECONOMY Washington

More information

OREGON SPORT OCEAN REGULATIONS FOR SALMON, HALIBUT AND OTHER MARINE FISH SPECIES

OREGON SPORT OCEAN REGULATIONS FOR SALMON, HALIBUT AND OTHER MARINE FISH SPECIES 2013 OREGON SPORT OCEAN REGULATIONS FOR SALMON, HALIBUT AND OTHER MARINE FISH SPECIES This information supersedes information listed in the 2013 Oregon Sport Fishing Regulations pamphlet. Note: Regulations

More information

Socioeconomic Profile of Fisheries in the Cordell Bank and Gulf of the Farallones NMSs

Socioeconomic Profile of Fisheries in the Cordell Bank and Gulf of the Farallones NMSs Socioeconomic Profile of Fisheries in the Cordell Bank and Gulf of the Farallones NMSs Presentation to CDFG and the joint fishing working group April 2-22, 25 Charles Steinback and Astrid Scholz Outline

More information

Agenda Item G.1.a Supplemental CDFW Report 2 September 2015

Agenda Item G.1.a Supplemental CDFW Report 2 September 2015 Agenda Item G.1.a Supplemental CDFW Report 2 September 2015 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE REPORT ON PACIFIC BLUEFIN MONITORING AND MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES FOR RECREATIONAL AND COMMERCIAL FISHERIES

More information

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE UPDATE ON LANDINGS OF TUNA, SWORDFISH AND OTHER PELAGICS

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE UPDATE ON LANDINGS OF TUNA, SWORDFISH AND OTHER PELAGICS Agenda Item I.2.a Supplemental CDFW Report November 216 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE UPDATE ON LANDINGS OF TUNA, SWORDFISH AND OTHER PELAGICS Update on Pacific Bluefin Tuna Commercial Landings

More information

Tuesday, April 10, 2018, 5:08 PM

Tuesday, April 10, 2018, 5:08 PM TABLE 2. 2018 Recreational management measures for non-indian ocean salmon fisheries - Council adopted. (Page 1 of 5) North of Cape Falcon Supplemental Management Information 1. Overall non-indian TAC:

More information

2018 OREGON SPORT OCEAN REGULATIONS FOR SALMON, HALIBUT, AND OTHER MARINE SPECIES

2018 OREGON SPORT OCEAN REGULATIONS FOR SALMON, HALIBUT, AND OTHER MARINE SPECIES 2018 OREGON SPORT OCEAN REGULATIONS FOR SALMON, HALIBUT, AND OTHER MARINE SPECIES This information supersedes information listed in the 2018 Oregon Sport Fishing Regulations pamphlet Note: Regulations

More information

Orange County MPA Watch A n n u a l R e p o r t

Orange County MPA Watch A n n u a l R e p o r t Orange County MPA Watch 2 0 1 4 A n n u a l R e p o r t WHAT IS AN MPA? Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) are discrete geographic marine or estuarine areas designed to protect or conserve marine life and habitat.

More information

Mississippi s Shore Night Fishing Survey. Marine Recreational Fisheries Statistics Survey. January 2001 December 2002.

Mississippi s Shore Night Fishing Survey. Marine Recreational Fisheries Statistics Survey. January 2001 December 2002. Mississippi s Shore Night Fishing Survey Marine Recreational Fisheries Statistics Survey January 2001 December 2002 Prepared for: FIN Committee Annual Meeting Hilton in the Walt Disney World Resort 1751

More information

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE UPDATE ON LANDINGS OF TUNA, SWORDFISH AND OTHER PELAGICS

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE UPDATE ON LANDINGS OF TUNA, SWORDFISH AND OTHER PELAGICS Agenda Item H.2.c Supplemental CDFW Report 1 November 217 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE UPDATE ON LANDINGS OF TUNA, SWORDFISH AND OTHER PELAGICS CDFW Summary of HMS Landings Data Improvement

More information

OREGON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE REPORT ON INSEASON CHANGES

OREGON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE REPORT ON INSEASON CHANGES Agenda Item E.10.a Supplemental REVISED ODFW Report 1 September 2017 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE REPORT ON INSEASON CHANGES Oregon Research Set-Aside for Yelloweye Rockfish The Oregon Department

More information

FILED 11/22/ :49 AM ARCHIVES DIVISION SECRETARY OF STATE

FILED 11/22/ :49 AM ARCHIVES DIVISION SECRETARY OF STATE Attachment 2 OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE DENNIS RICHARDSON SECRETARY OF STATE LESLIE CUMMINGS DEPUTY SECRETARY OF STATE NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULEMAKING INCLUDING STATEMENT OF NEED & FISCAL IMPACT CHAPTER

More information

Orange County MPA Watch A n n u a l R e p o r t

Orange County MPA Watch A n n u a l R e p o r t Orange County MPA Watch 2 0 1 5 A n n u a l R e p o r t WHAT IS AN MPA? Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) are discrete geographic marine or estuarine areas designed to protect or conserve marine life and habitat.

More information

The Resources Agency. AND ClNIWL CALIFORNIA, QUARTERLY REFOIZT N0.14, OCTOBER TO DECEMBER, Administrative Report No MARINE RESOURCES

The Resources Agency. AND ClNIWL CALIFORNIA, QUARTERLY REFOIZT N0.14, OCTOBER TO DECEMBER, Administrative Report No MARINE RESOURCES State of California The Resources Agency DEF'AR'MENT OF FISH AND GAME MARINE RECREATIONAL FISHERIES STATISTICS SURVM FOR AND ClNIWL CALIFORNIA, QUARTERLY REFOIZT N0.14, OCTOBER TO DECEMBER, 1982 MARINE

More information

Olympic National Park Fishing and Shellfish Regulations

Olympic National Park Fishing and Shellfish Regulations Olympic National Park Fishing and Shellfish Regulations Effective May 1, 2008 through April 30, 2009 Olympic National Park is managed as a natural area. The primary objectives of the fisheries management

More information

GROUNDFISH MANAGEMENT TEAM PROGRESS REPORT ON DEVELOPING MORTALITY RATES FOR ROCKFISH RELEASED USING DESCENDING DEVICES. Executive Summary...

GROUNDFISH MANAGEMENT TEAM PROGRESS REPORT ON DEVELOPING MORTALITY RATES FOR ROCKFISH RELEASED USING DESCENDING DEVICES. Executive Summary... Agenda Item I.3.b GMT Report November 2012 GROUNDFISH MANAGEMENT TEAM PROGRESS REPORT ON DEVELOPING MORTALITY RATES FOR ROCKFISH RELEASED USING DESCENDING DEVICES Contents Executive Summary... 4 Summary

More information

U.S. Fisheries - Sustainable Seafood Laurel Bryant

U.S. Fisheries - Sustainable Seafood Laurel Bryant U.S. Fisheries - Sustainable Seafood Laurel Bryant Chief, External Affairs NOAA Fisheries Communications Office Sustainable Seafood-3 Things Dynamic and every evolving NOAA - founding partner, global leader

More information

CA Collaborative Fisheries Research Program. Rod-and-Reel Surveys of Nearshore Fishes in and Near Central California Marine Protected Areas

CA Collaborative Fisheries Research Program. Rod-and-Reel Surveys of Nearshore Fishes in and Near Central California Marine Protected Areas CA Collaborative Fisheries Research Program Rod-and-Reel Surveys of Nearshore Fishes in and Near Central California Marine Protected Areas Methodology Overview For information that is more detailed see

More information

GROUNDFISH MANAGEMENT TEAM REPORT ON CONSIDERATION OF INSEASON ADJUSTMENTS, INCLUDING CARRYOVER. Annual Vessel Limit (15.4%)

GROUNDFISH MANAGEMENT TEAM REPORT ON CONSIDERATION OF INSEASON ADJUSTMENTS, INCLUDING CARRYOVER. Annual Vessel Limit (15.4%) Agenda Item I.3.a Supplemental GMT Report 2 March 2017 GROUNDFISH MANAGEMENT TEAM REPORT ON CONSIDERATION OF INSEASON ADJUSTMENTS, INCLUDING CARRYOVER The Groundfish Management Team (GMT) reviewed the

More information

GROUNDFISH MANAGEMENT TEAM (GMT) REPORT ON CONSIDERATION OF INSEASON ADJUSTMENTS

GROUNDFISH MANAGEMENT TEAM (GMT) REPORT ON CONSIDERATION OF INSEASON ADJUSTMENTS Agenda Item G.3.b Supplemental GMT Report September 2007 GROUNDFISH MANAGEMENT TEAM (GMT) REPORT ON CONSIDERATION OF INSEASON ADJUSTMENTS The GMT considered the most recent information on the status of

More information

To Fish or Not to Fish? A role-playing activity based on the Marine Reserves process at the Channel Islands National Marine Sanctuary

To Fish or Not to Fish? A role-playing activity based on the Marine Reserves process at the Channel Islands National Marine Sanctuary To Fish or Not to Fish? A role-playing activity based on the Marine Reserves process at the Channel Islands National Marine Sanctuary Introduction This role playing activity is designed to teach you about

More information

Orange County MPA Watch M o n i t o r i n g H u m a n U s a g e

Orange County MPA Watch M o n i t o r i n g H u m a n U s a g e Orange County MPA Watch M o n i t o r i n g H u m a n U s a g e WHAT IS AN MPA? Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) are discrete geographic marine or estuarine areas designed to protect or conserve marine life

More information

10/5/2015. lingcod Ophiodon elongatus OELO. blue rockfish Sebastes mystinus SMYS. blacksmith Chromis punctipinnis CPUN

10/5/2015. lingcod Ophiodon elongatus OELO. blue rockfish Sebastes mystinus SMYS. blacksmith Chromis punctipinnis CPUN Aids to identification Where s the Fish? Atwood 1. Humann, Paul. 1996. Coastal Fish Identifications: California to Alaska. First Edition. New World Publications, Jacksonville, FL. 2. Eschmeyer, W.N., E.S.

More information

2016 West Coast Entanglement Summary

2016 West Coast Entanglement Summary March 2017 2016 West Coast Entanglement Summary Overview of Entanglement Data west coast region MMHSRP Permit #18786 In 2016, 71 separate cases of entangled whales were reported off the coasts of Washington,

More information

Charter Boat Catch and Effort from the Michigan Waters of the Great Lakes, 2002

Charter Boat Catch and Effort from the Michigan Waters of the Great Lakes, 2002 Charter Boat Catch and Effort from the Michigan Waters of the Great Lakes, 2002 David F. Clapp and Donna Wesander-Russell Gerald Rakoczy MDNR Fisheries Research Biologist, Great Lakes Creel and Charter

More information

FISHERIES REVIEW CalCOFI Rep., Vol. 52, 2011

FISHERIES REVIEW CalCOFI Rep., Vol. 52, 2011 REVIEW OF SELECTED CALIFORNIA FISHERIES FOR 21: COASTAL PELAGIC FINFISH, MARKET SQUID, OCEAN SALMON, GROUNDFISH, HIGHLY MIGRATORY SPECIES, DUNGENESS CRAB, SPINY LOBSTER, SPOT PRAWN, KELLET S WHELK, AND

More information

Linkages between open and coastal ecosystems on the Pacific coast of North America

Linkages between open and coastal ecosystems on the Pacific coast of North America Linkages between open and coastal ecosystems on the Pacific coast of North America R.J. Beamish, G.A.McFarlane, & J.R. King Pacific Biological Station, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Nanaimo, B.C. Canada

More information

California Department of Fish and Wildlife Report to the International Pacific Halibut Commission on 2017 California Fisheries

California Department of Fish and Wildlife Report to the International Pacific Halibut Commission on 2017 California Fisheries IPHC-2018-AM094-AR08 Received: 22 December 2017 California Department of Fish and Wildlife Report to the International Pacific Halibut Commission on 2017 California Fisheries California Department of Fish

More information

Summary of 2012 DNR and Partners Fisheries Surveys in St. Clair/Lake Erie and Fishery Forecast for 2013

Summary of 2012 DNR and Partners Fisheries Surveys in St. Clair/Lake Erie and Fishery Forecast for 2013 Summary of 2012 DNR and Partners Fisheries Surveys in St. Clair/Lake Erie and Fishery Forecast for 2013 LE/LSC Citizens Fishery Advisory Committee April 2, 2013 Michael Thomas Fisheries Research Biologist

More information

Marine Sanctuaries Conservation Series ONMS-14-02

Marine Sanctuaries Conservation Series ONMS-14-02 Marine Sanctuaries Conservation Series ONMS-14-02 Economic Impact of the Commercial Fisheries on Local County Economies from Catch in the Gulf of Farallones National Marine Sanctuary 2010, 2011 and 2012

More information

Estimates of Historic Recreational Landings of Vermilion Snapper in the South Atlantic Using the FHWAR Census Method. Ken Brennan SEDAR 55-WP04

Estimates of Historic Recreational Landings of Vermilion Snapper in the South Atlantic Using the FHWAR Census Method. Ken Brennan SEDAR 55-WP04 Estimates of Historic Recreational Landings of Vermilion Snapper in the South Atlantic Using the FHWAR Census Method Ken Brennan SEDAR 55-WP04 Submitted: 7 November 2017 This information is distributed

More information

2015 Nearshore Logbook Report and 2017 Groundfish Fishery Regulations

2015 Nearshore Logbook Report and 2017 Groundfish Fishery Regulations Oregon Fish & Wildlife Commission December 2, 2016 Exhibit D 2015 Nearshore Logbook Report and 2017 Groundfish Fishery Regulations Maggie Sommer Marine Fishery Management Section Leader 2015 Commercial

More information

DEDUCTIONS EFFECTIVE DECEMBER 1, NOVEMBER 30, MONTHLY PREMIUM

DEDUCTIONS EFFECTIVE DECEMBER 1, NOVEMBER 30, MONTHLY PREMIUM BAY AREA REGION HEALTH NET SMARTCARE CONTRA COSTA HEALTH PLAN WESTERN HEALTH ADVANTAGE $831.44 $695.93 $135.51 $1,662.88 $1,391.85 $271.03 $2,161.74 $1,809.41 $352.33 $1,111.13 $800.23 $310.90 $2,222.26

More information

9 This section relies heavily on

9 This section relies heavily on 2. Historical Perspective and Current Trends Fisheries have long played an important role in the economic, social, and cultural life of coastal communities in North-central California. 9 At the time of

More information

Agenda Item F.9.a Supplement GMT Report 3 November 2017

Agenda Item F.9.a Supplement GMT Report 3 November 2017 Agenda Item F.9.a Supplement GMT Report 3 November 2017 GROUNDFISH MANAGEMENT TEAM REPORT ON BIENNIAL MANAGEMENT MEASURES FOR 2019-2020 In Agenda Item F.9.a, GMT Report 1, November 2017, the Groundfish

More information

TABLE 1. Commercial troll management measures adopted by the Council for non-indian ocean salmon fisheries, 2016.

TABLE 1. Commercial troll management measures adopted by the Council for non-indian ocean salmon fisheries, 2016. (Page 1 of 5) North of Cape Falcon Supplemental Management Information 1. Overall non-indian TAC: 70,000 Chinook and 18,900 coho marked with a healed adipose fin clip (marked). 2. Non-Indian commercial

More information

STUDY PERFORMANCE REPORT

STUDY PERFORMANCE REPORT STUDY PERFORMANCE REPORT State: Michigan Study No.: 427 Project No.: F-81-R-1 Title: Measurement of sportfishing harvest in lakes Michigan, Huron, Erie, and Superior Period Covered: October 1, 1999 to

More information

FISH DIVISION Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife

FISH DIVISION Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife INFORMATION REPORTS NUMBER 2008-03 FISH DIVISION Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Reducing Bycatch in Oregon's Recreational Groundfish Fishery: Experimental Results with Angling Gear Configured to

More information

A description of the need for a few utilitarian edits is highlighted below in green. The other suggested edits are more grammatical.

A description of the need for a few utilitarian edits is highlighted below in green. The other suggested edits are more grammatical. A description of the need for a few utilitarian edits is highlighted below in green. The other suggested edits are more grammatical. Blue = deleted language Red = added language HB 3193 2017 Regular Session

More information

Characterizing the Fish Assemblages of Cordell Bank National Marine Sanctuary

Characterizing the Fish Assemblages of Cordell Bank National Marine Sanctuary Characterizing the Fish Assemblages of Cordell Bank National Marine Sanctuary Dale Roberts & Many Others NATIONAL MARINE SANCTUARIES TM CORDELL BANK Point Reyes Lighthouse Cordell Bank I&M and SWiM* Similarities

More information

Orange County MPA Watch 2016 A n n u a l R e p o r t

Orange County MPA Watch 2016 A n n u a l R e p o r t Orange County MPA Watch 2016 A n n u a l R e p o r t WHAT IS AN MPA? Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) are discrete geographic marine or estuarine areas designed to protect or conserve marine life and habitat.

More information

APPLICATION FOR EXEMPTED FISHING PERMIT FOR YELLOWTAIL ROCKFISH JIG FISHING FOR THE FISHING SEASON

APPLICATION FOR EXEMPTED FISHING PERMIT FOR YELLOWTAIL ROCKFISH JIG FISHING FOR THE FISHING SEASON Agenda Item E.2 Attachment 1 June 2018 APPLICATION FOR EXEMPTED FISHING PERMIT FOR YELLOWTAIL ROCKFISH JIG FISHING FOR THE 2019-2020 FISHING SEASON Groundfish EFP Proposal: Y ellowtail Rockfish Jig Fishing

More information

OREGON'S GROUNDFISH FISHERIES

OREGON'S GROUNDFISH FISHERIES OREGON'S GROUNDFISH FISHERIES AND ASSOCIATED INVESTIGATIONS IN 2003 Prepared For the May 4-5, 2004 Meeting Of The Technical Sub-Committee Of The Canada-United States Groundfish Committee OREGON DEPARTMENT

More information

California Fixed Gear and Recreational Fisheries Pedro Point (between San Francisco and Half Moon Bay)

California Fixed Gear and Recreational Fisheries Pedro Point (between San Francisco and Half Moon Bay) GROUNDFISH MANAGEMENT TEAM REPORT ON PROPOSED 2004 GROUNDFISH MANAGEMENT MEASURES B.14.b. Supplemental GMT Report June 2003 The Groundfish Management Team (GMT) discussed various management measures for

More information

Public Input to St. Lawrence River Fisheries Community Objectives

Public Input to St. Lawrence River Fisheries Community Objectives Public Input to St. Lawrence River Fisheries Community Objectives Tommy L. Brown, Human Dimensions Research Unit, Cornell University Steven R. LaPan, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation,

More information

SURFACE TEMPERATURES AND SALMON DISTRIBUTION RELATIVE TO THE BOUNDARIES OF THE JAPANESE DRIFT GILLNET FISHERY FOR FLYING SQUID (Ommastrephes bartrami)

SURFACE TEMPERATURES AND SALMON DISTRIBUTION RELATIVE TO THE BOUNDARIES OF THE JAPANESE DRIFT GILLNET FISHERY FOR FLYING SQUID (Ommastrephes bartrami) FRI UW 83 17 October, 1983 SURFACE TEMPERATURES AND SALMON DISTRIBUTION RELATIVE TO THE BOUNDARIES OF THE JAPANESE DRIFT GILLNET FISHERY FOR FLYING SQUID (Ommastrephes bartrami) by Robert L. Burgner and

More information

October Net Loss: Overfishing Off the Pacific Coast

October Net Loss: Overfishing Off the Pacific Coast October 2007 Net Loss: Overfishing Off the Pacific Coast Net Loss Overfishing Off the Pacific Coast October 2007 Acknowledgements Written by Michael Gravitz, Oceans Advocate, U.S. PIRG Education Fund,

More information

1. On the night following WHAT DAY did you observe for the California Grunion?

1. On the night following WHAT DAY did you observe for the California Grunion? 1. On the night following WHAT DAY did you observe for the California Grunion? Month Day Date 2. Where did you observe the grunion: County? San Diego County Orange County Los Angeles County Ventura County

More information

Pacific Coast Groundfish Fishery Harvest Specifications and Management Measures

Pacific Coast Groundfish Fishery Harvest Specifications and Management Measures Agenda Item F.2 Attachment 1 (Electronic Only) April 2018 Pacific Coast Groundfish Fishery 2019-2020 Harvest Specifications and Management Measures Analytical Document Organized as a Preliminary Draft

More information

ASMFC Stock Assessment Overview: Red Drum

ASMFC Stock Assessment Overview: Red Drum Purpose The purpose of this document is to improve the understanding and transparency of the Commission s stock assessment process and results. It is the first of several that will be developed throughout

More information

Groundfish EFP Proposal: Yellowtail Rockfish Jig Fishing off California. Applicants Mailing address Telephone # 535 Ramsell St.

Groundfish EFP Proposal: Yellowtail Rockfish Jig Fishing off California. Applicants Mailing address Telephone #  535 Ramsell St. Agenda Item H.2.a Attachment 4 November 2013 Groundfish EFP Proposal: Yellowtail Rockfish Jig Fishing off California Date of Application: October 9, 2013 Applicants Mailing address Telephone # Email 535

More information

Charter Boat Fishing in Lake Michigan: 2017 Illinois Reported Harvest

Charter Boat Fishing in Lake Michigan: 2017 Illinois Reported Harvest Illinois Department of Natural Resources Division of Fisheries Charter Boat Fishing in Lake Michigan: 2017 Illinois Reported Harvest Steven R. Robillard Illinois Department of Natural Resources Lake Michigan

More information

IFP HIPAA Guaranteed Issue plans monthly rates

IFP HIPAA Guaranteed Issue plans monthly rates IFP HIPAA Guaranteed Issue plans monthly rates Effective March 1, 2012 for HMO and PPO plans HIPAA Guaranteed-issue plans are available to individuals who meet the requirements specified on the Blue Shield

More information

08-09 TABLE OF CONTENTS

08-09 TABLE OF CONTENTS Contains in-season changes to freshwater and ocean sport fishing regulations for 2008-2009 08-09 TABLE OF CONTENTS Changes to Freshwater Fishing Regulations Anadromous Waters of the Klamath River Below

More information

DRIVING TOURS. Grays Harbor County is a fisherman s dream! Fish the bay, ocean, streams, rivers or lakes... the choice is yours!

DRIVING TOURS. Grays Harbor County is a fisherman s dream! Fish the bay, ocean, streams, rivers or lakes... the choice is yours! Grays County is a fisherman s dream! bay, ocean, streams, rivers or lakes... the choice is yours! Grays offers excellent fresh and saltwater fishing in all seasons. Fish in the open ocean for tuna, halibut,

More information

Evaluating the Accuracy of Trawl Logbook Estimates of Groundfish Discards

Evaluating the Accuracy of Trawl Logbook Estimates of Groundfish Discards Evaluating the Accuracy of Trawl Logbook Estimates of Groundfish Discards David B. Sampson and Yong-Woo Lee Oregon State University Coastal Oregon Marine Experiment Station Hatfield Marine Science Center

More information

Tuesday, April 10, 2018, 5:04 PM

Tuesday, April 10, 2018, 5:04 PM TABLE 1. 2018 Commercial troll management measures for non-indian ocean salmon fisheries - Council adopted. (Page 1 of 6) A. SEASON DESCRIPTIONS North of Cape Falcon Supplemental Management Information

More information

Tournament Rules There are five divisions in the Deep Sea Roundup: Bay-Surf, Offshore, Flyfishing, Tarpon Release, and Billfish Release.

Tournament Rules There are five divisions in the Deep Sea Roundup: Bay-Surf, Offshore, Flyfishing, Tarpon Release, and Billfish Release. Tournament Rules There are five divisions in the Deep Sea Roundup: Bay-Surf, Offshore, Flyfishing, Tarpon Release, and Billfish Release. There is a separate awards category for Junior anglers in the Bay-Surf

More information

NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE REPORT ON PACIFIC HALIBUT CATCH SHARING PLAN CHANGES FOR 2015

NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE REPORT ON PACIFIC HALIBUT CATCH SHARING PLAN CHANGES FOR 2015 Agenda Item G.1.b Supplemental NMFS Report 1 November 2014 NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE REPORT ON PACIFIC HALIBUT CATCH SHARING PLAN CHANGES FOR 2015 Table of Contents Purpose of the document... 2

More information

ASMFC Stock Assessment Overview: Red Drum

ASMFC Stock Assessment Overview: Red Drum Introduction This document presents a summary of the 217 stock assessments for red drum. These assessments were initially conducted through the Southeast Data, Assessment and Review (SEDAR) process using

More information

6 th Meeting of the Scientific Committee Puerto Varas, Chile, 9-14 September 2018

6 th Meeting of the Scientific Committee Puerto Varas, Chile, 9-14 September 2018 6 th Meeting of the Scientific Committee Puerto Varas, Chile, 9-14 September 218 SC6-Doc23_rev1 China s Annual Report, part I (Jack mackerel) Gang Li, Xiaorong Zou & Luoliang Xu Annual Report of China

More information

Commercial Dungeness Crab Newsletter

Commercial Dungeness Crab Newsletter Commercial Dungeness Crab Newsletter September 2, 2008 Oregon Department of Fish & Wildlife 2040 SE Marine Science Drive, Newport, OR 97365 541-867-4741 Contents Page Season summary.... 1 Rule changes.....

More information

NOAA/NWFSC Southern California Shelf Rockfish Hook and Line Survey

NOAA/NWFSC Southern California Shelf Rockfish Hook and Line Survey NOAA/NWFSC Southern California Shelf Rockfish Hook and Line Survey NOAA Fisheries, Northwest Fisheries Science Center 2725 Montlake Blvd. E, Seattle, WA 98112 John Harms, NOAA/NWFSC Jim Benante, PSMFC/NWFSC

More information

OPTIONS FOR DISCUSSION ON FISHING IN MULTIPLE IFQ MANAGEMENT AREAS

OPTIONS FOR DISCUSSION ON FISHING IN MULTIPLE IFQ MANAGEMENT AREAS OPTIONS FOR DISCUSSION ON FISHING IN MULTIPLE IFQ MANAGEMENT AREAS Agenda Item G.9.a NMFS Report June 2016 This report provides options for discussion on fishing in multiple individual fishing quota (IFQ)

More information

FISHERIES REVIEW CalCOFI Rep., Vol. 44, 2003

FISHERIES REVIEW CalCOFI Rep., Vol. 44, 2003 REVIEW OF SOME CALIFORNIA FISHERIES FOR 2002: MARKET SQUID, SEA URCHIN, DUNGENESS CRAB, PRAWN, COASTAL PELAGIC FINFISH, ALBACORE, OCEAN SALMON, NEARSHORE LIVE-FISH, PACIFIC HERRING, AND RECREATIONAL CALIFORNIA

More information

San Francisco Estuary Institute

San Francisco Estuary Institute San Francisco Estuary Institute 7770 Pardee Lane 2 nd Floor Oakland, CA 94621-1424 Office (510) 746-7334 Fax (510) 746-7300 RMP Fish Committee Meeting San Francisco Estuary Institute Meeting Minutes November

More information

Salmon Technical Team Preseason Report III Tables

Salmon Technical Team Preseason Report III Tables Attachment 4 Oregon Fish and Wildlife Commission Date: April 20, 2012 EXHIBIT C Salmon Technical Team Preseason Report III Tables Salmon Management Measures Adopted by the Council for 2012-April 2013 Ocean

More information

Monterey Bay Fishermen Exempted Fishing Permit

Monterey Bay Fishermen Exempted Fishing Permit Agenda Item F.8 Supplemental Attachment 7 November 2017 Monterey Bay Fishermen Exempted Fishing Permit Chilipepper Rockfish October 19, 2017 Applicant: Real Good Fish, a Community Supported Fishery 7532

More information

GROUNDFISH COOPERATIVE RESEARCH PROJECT

GROUNDFISH COOPERATIVE RESEARCH PROJECT GROUNDFISH COOPERATIVE RESEARCH PROJECT Species Composition, Relative Abundance, and Movements of Important Nearshore Fish Species Along the North Central California Coast Final Report to the Pacific States

More information

COLLABORATIVE FISHERIES RESEARCH PROJECT. Surveys of Nearshore Fishes in and Near Central California Marine Protected Areas

COLLABORATIVE FISHERIES RESEARCH PROJECT. Surveys of Nearshore Fishes in and Near Central California Marine Protected Areas COLLABORATIVE FISHERIES RESEARCH PROJECT Surveys of Nearshore Fishes in and Near Central California Marine Protected Areas Final Report Submitted to the Ocean Protection Council and California Sea Grant

More information

2nd Year. Addt'l Wage or Pension. Total Package 50% 1 Alameda $37.12 $24.13 $2.25 $4.50 $0.00 $6.24 $46.40 $30.16 $2.25 $4.50 $0.50 $8.

2nd Year. Addt'l Wage or Pension. Total Package 50% 1 Alameda $37.12 $24.13 $2.25 $4.50 $0.00 $6.24 $46.40 $30.16 $2.25 $4.50 $0.50 $8. > 0 to 1,600 OJT Hours 1,601 to 3,200 OJT Hours 40% 50% 1 Alameda $37.12 $24.13 $2.25 $4.50 $0.00 $6.24 $46.40 $30.16 $2.25 $4.50 $0.50 $8.99 2 Alpine $28.10 $18.27 $2.25 $4.50 $0.00 $3.08 $35.12 $22.83

More information

Charter Boat Fishing in Lake Michigan: 2015 Illinois Reported Harvest

Charter Boat Fishing in Lake Michigan: 2015 Illinois Reported Harvest Illinois Department of Natural Resources Division of Fisheries Charter Boat Fishing in Lake Michigan: 2015 Illinois Reported Harvest Steven R. Robillard Illinois Department of Natural Resources Lake Michigan

More information

tools for spatial management see the collection by Wright and Scholz (2005).

tools for spatial management see the collection by Wright and Scholz (2005). 3. Status of Fisheries in the Sanctuaries In the wake of recent scientific, technological and political advances, marine resource management has become increasingly spatially explicit. 14 Management techniques

More information

Charter Boat Catch and Effort from the Michigan Waters of the Great Lakes, 1994

Charter Boat Catch and Effort from the Michigan Waters of the Great Lakes, 1994 Michigan DNR STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Number 95-3 April 3, 1997 Boat Catch and Effort from the Michigan Waters of the Great Lakes, 1994 Gerald P. Rakoczy and Ronald F. Svoboda

More information

2018 NASS RIVER SALMON STOCK ASSESSMENT UPDATE MONDAY, 9 JULY

2018 NASS RIVER SALMON STOCK ASSESSMENT UPDATE MONDAY, 9 JULY 218 NASS RIVER SALMON STOCK ASSESSMENT UPDATE MONDAY, 9 JULY The following is the fourth general public update for 218 of Nass River salmon and summer run steelhead stock assessments from the Nisga a Lisims

More information

Pacific Fishery Management Council NEWS RELEASE WEST COAST SALMON SEASON DATES SET

Pacific Fishery Management Council NEWS RELEASE WEST COAST SALMON SEASON DATES SET Pacific Fishery Management Council NEWS RELEASE FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Tuesday, April 11, 2017 Contact: Ms. Jennifer Gilden, Communications Officer, Jennifer.gilden@noaa.gov Mr. Mike Burner, Deputy Director,

More information

Mercury Levels in Commercial Fish and Shellfish

Mercury Levels in Commercial Fish and Shellfish FISH 1 ATTACHMENT 4 FISH http://www.fda.gov/food/foodsafety/product- SpecificInformation/Seafood/FoodbornePathogensContaminants/Methylmercury/ucm115 644.htm Mercury Levels in Commercial Fish and Shellfish

More information

Columbia River Fisheries Management. Estimating Effort, Catch, and ESA Impacts in Recreational Fisheries

Columbia River Fisheries Management. Estimating Effort, Catch, and ESA Impacts in Recreational Fisheries Columbia River Fisheries Management Estimating Effort, Catch, and ESA Impacts in Recreational Fisheries Columbia River Fisheries Management Recreational Fisheries Responsibilities: Estimate angler effort

More information

Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) Summary for Year 1 of the California Coast Survey

Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) Summary for Year 1 of the California Coast Survey APPENDIX 1 Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) Summary for Year 1 of the California Coast Survey APPENDIX 1 Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) Summary for Year 1 of the California Coast Survey

More information

LONE TREE POCKET ESTUARY RESTORATION 2004 FISH SAMPLING AND PRE-RESTORATION PROJECT MONITORING REPORT

LONE TREE POCKET ESTUARY RESTORATION 2004 FISH SAMPLING AND PRE-RESTORATION PROJECT MONITORING REPORT Skagit River System Cooperative 11426 Moorage Way P.O. Box 368 LaConner, WA 98257-368 Phone: 36-466-7228 Fax: 36-466-447 www.skagitcoop.org LONE TREE POCKET ESTUARY RESTORATION 24 FISH SAMPLING AND PRE-RESTORATION

More information

Monitoring the length structure of commercial landings of albacore tuna during the fishing year

Monitoring the length structure of commercial landings of albacore tuna during the fishing year SCTB15 Working Paper ALB-5 Monitoring the length structure of commercial landings of albacore tuna during the 2001 2002 fishing year Linda Griggs National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research Ltd.

More information

Draft Addendum V For Board Review. Coastal Sharks Management Board August 8, 2018

Draft Addendum V For Board Review. Coastal Sharks Management Board August 8, 2018 Draft Addendum V For Board Review Coastal Sharks Management Board August 8, 2018 Outline Overview Statement of the Problem Background Management Options Questions Overview May 2018: Board was presented

More information

Essential Fish Habitat Consultation

Essential Fish Habitat Consultation 1 Essential Fish Habitat Consultation Marine Shoreline Development Workshop February 21, 2007 John H. Stadler Washington State Habitat Office National Marine Fisheries Service Magnuson-Stevens Fishery

More information

In the area between the U.S./Canada border and the Queets River, the landing and possession limit is 50

In the area between the U.S./Canada border and the Queets River, the landing and possession limit is 50 TABLE 1. 2019 Commercial troll management Alternatives for non-indian ocean salmon fisheries - Council Adopted. (Page 1 of 11) North of Cape Falcon North of Cape Falcon North of Cape Falcon Supplemental

More information

HIGHLY MIGRATORY SPECIES MANAGEMENT TEAM REPORT ON DRIFT GILLNET MONITORING, MANAGEMENT, AND ALTERNATIVE GEAR REPORT

HIGHLY MIGRATORY SPECIES MANAGEMENT TEAM REPORT ON DRIFT GILLNET MONITORING, MANAGEMENT, AND ALTERNATIVE GEAR REPORT Agenda Item K.5.b Supplemental HMSMT Report 2 March 2014 HIGHLY MIGRATORY SPECIES MANAGEMENT TEAM REPORT ON DRIFT GILLNET MONITORING, MANAGEMENT, AND ALTERNATIVE GEAR REPORT 1. Analysis of Potential Effort,

More information

Essential Fish Habitat OCNMS Advisory Council July 13, 2013

Essential Fish Habitat OCNMS Advisory Council July 13, 2013 Essential Fish Habitat OCNMS Advisory Council July 13, 2013 John Stadler Habitat Conservation Division NMFS Northwest Region Essential Fish Habitat (EFH) What is it, where did it come from, and what does

More information