Wind Turbine Generator System Pika T701 Acoustic Test Report
|
|
- Stephen Horton
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Wind Turbine Generator System Pika T701 Acoustic Test Report Conducted by High Plains Small Wind Test Center Colby, KS November 10, 2015 Approval By: Ruth Douglas Miller, Lead Engineer, Date Review By: Arlinda Huskey, NWTC, Date
2 Table of Contents 1 Background Test Summary Test Turbine Configuration Test Site Description Test Equipment Equipment Descriptions Instrument Locations Results Test Conditions Standardized Wind Speed Calculation Apparent Sound Power Level One-Third Octave Analysis Tonality Uncertainty Exceptions Exceptions to the Standard Exceptions to the Quality Assurance System References Appendix A. Calibration Sheets Appendix B. American Wind Energy Association Standard Acoustic Analysis Appendix C Uncertainty Assumptions Appendix D. Pictures List of Figures Figure 1. Pika T701 wind turbine at High Plains Test Center... 6 Figure 2. Wiring diagram of turbine and inverter installation. 6 Figure 3. High Plains SWTC wind rose for May 2014-May Figure 4. Aerial view of the Pika T701 turbine and met tower at the HP test site... 8 Figure 5. Measured and binned sound pressure levels as a function of the standardized wind speed 11 Figure 6. Hub-height sound power levels as a function of the standardized wind speed Figure 7. One-third octave levels (db) vs frequency Figure 8. Classification of spectral lines for tone Figure 9. Classification of spectral lines for tone Figure A1. Calibration sheet for the primary anemometer, p 1 of Figure A2. Calibration sheet for the primary anemometer, p 2 of Figure A3. Calibration sheet for the secondary anemometer, p 1 of Figure A4. Manufacturer specification sheet for the wind vane, p 1 of Figure A5. Manufacturer specification sheet for the wind vane, p 2 of 2 21 Figure A6. Manufacturer specification sheet for the temperature probe, p 1 of Figure A7. Manufacturer specification sheet for the temperature probe, p 2 of Figure A8. Calibration sheet for the pressure transducer Figure A9. Calibration sheet for the power transducer, p 1 of Figure A10. Calibration sheet for the power transducer, p 2 of Figure A11. Calibration sheet for the power transducer, p 3 of Figure A12. Voltage module (temperature & pressure), mfger calibration certificate pg 1 of Figure A13. Current module (for power transducer) mfger calibration certificate pg 1 of
3 Figure A14. NI 9421 digital input module (for both anemometers) mfger data sheet pg 1 of Figure A15. Calibration sheet for the NoiseLab Sound Measuring System, p 1 of Figure A16. Calibration sheet for the NoiseLab Sound Measuring System, p 1 of Figure A17. Calibration sheet for the NoiseLab Microphone Unit, p 1 of Figure A18. Calibration sheet for the NoiseLab Microphone Unit, p 2 of Figure A19. Calibration sheet for the NoiseLab Acoustical Calibrator p 1 of Figure A20. Calibration sheet for the NoiseLab Acoustical Calibrator p 2 of 2 36 Figure D1. Picture of the sound board during the test, 12 March, Figure D2. The test turbine viewed from the reference microphone position, 12 March Figure D3. Test turbine viewed from the met mast, 12 March, Figure D4. Picture of the sound board during the test, 30 March, Figure D5. The test turbine viewed from the reference microphone position, 30 March Figure D6. Test turbine viewed from the met mast, 30 March, List of Tables Table 1. Test Results Summary... 4 Table 2. Pika T701 Wind Turbine General Data... 5 Table 3. System wiring summary 7 Table 4. Sources of Noise Near the Turbine on 12 March, Table 5. Sources of Noise Near the Turbine on 30 March, Table 6. Equipment Used for Acoustic Test... 9 Table 7. Reference Microphone Positions for Turbine and Background Measurements Table 8. Test Parameters Used in Wind Speed Calculations Table 9. Sound Pressure and Power Levels for Standardized Integer Wind Speeds (6 m/s through 11 m/s) Table 10. One-Third Octave Analysis for Wind Speed Bins 6 Through 8 m/s Table 11. One-Third Octave Analysis for Wind Speed Bins 9 Through 11 m/s Table 12. Tonality Results (In dba) Table 13. Type B Uncertainty Components for Sound Power Levels and Tonality Table B1. AWEA Rated Sound Level
4 1 Background The Pika Wind T701 1-kW small wind turbine was tested in accordance with AWEA (American Wind Energy Association) Small Wind Turbine Performance and Safety Standard (AWEA Standard ) and IEC (International Electrotechnical Commission) Standard Wind Turbine Generator Systems - Part 11: Acoustic Noise Measurement Techniques, IEC , Edition 2.1, This test report refers to these procedures collectively as the Standard. Testing of the Pika T701 was conducted under contract as part of NREL s Regional Test Center (RTC) program. 2 Test Summary The Pika T701 is a three bladed, Horizontal Axis Wind Turbine. It has a 3.0-meter rotor diameter resulting in a rotor swept area of 7.1 m2. The data presented in this report was collected during acoustic tests conducted at High Plains Small Wind Test Center in Colby, KS. Testing was conducted on 12 March 2015 and 30 March This test was conducted in accordance with the International Electrotechnical Commission s (IEC) standard, Wind Turbine Generator Systems - Part 11: Acoustic Noise Measurement Techniques, IEC , Edition 2.1, The additional requirements of AWEA (American Wind Energy Association) Small Wind Turbine Performance and Safety Standard (AWEA Standard ) were also considered. Table 1. Test Results Summary Standardized wind speed at 10 m height, Vs [m/s] Power output calculated from power curve {W] Measured pitch angle [ ] Estimated rotor speed [rpm: 42.5 x wind speed] N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Apparent sound power level [dba] Combined uncertainty in sound power level, UC [dba] Frequency band of most prevalent tone [Hertz (Hz)] Tonality, ΔLk [dba] Tonal audibility, ΔLa,k [dba] NR The difference between total and background noise was less than 3 db. According to Section 8.2 of the Standard, the wind turbine noise was less than the background noise. 3 Test Turbine Configuration The data presented in this report was collected during acoustic tests conducted from 12 March 2015 and 30 March 2015 at the High Plains Regional Test Center (HPRTC) in Colby, Kansas. The Pika Energy T701 model specifications are summarized in Table 2. This turbine will be referred to as the Pika T701 for the rest of this report. A photo of the T701 turbine and met tower is included as Figure 1. 4
5 Table 2. Summary of T701 published specifications. *: rotor diameter was verified manually by measuring the radius of the rotor when it was on the ground. Parameter Value Units Manufacturer and address Pika Energy Inc 35 Bradley Dr Stop 1 Westbrook, ME Turbine Serial Number T Inverter Serial Number X Production Date 2014 Tower Type Tilting Monopole Tower Height 16.8 m Hub Height m Blade make, type, serial number Pika Energy, glass-filled polypropylene, no serial number Turbine Control System Pika Energy proprietary Turbine Interface Pika Energy Review (via inverter) Turbine Type Horizontal axis propeller Number of Blades 3 Rotor Diameter 3.0* m Rotor Swept Area 7.1 m 2 Blade Pitching Fixed, 0.8 at 75% of blade length 11m/s Reference Power (REbus DC) 1.6 kw 11m/s Reference Power (AC after 1.45 kw inverter) Cut-in Wind Speed 3.3 m/s Rated Wind Speed 11 m/s Rated Rotor Speed 420 RPM Speed Regulation Type Stall regulation w/ redundant mechanical brake Yaw Control Passive, upwind with tail IEC Turbine Design Class II Turbine DC Output Voltage (nominal) 380 V Turbine Max Output Current 7 A Inverter Output Voltage 220/240 VAC Inverter Output Current Max 13 A Inverter Output Frequency 60 Hz 5
6 Figure 1. T701 Turbine installed at High Plains Regional Test Center; view west from data shed, met tower behind turbine. A one line diagram of the installation wiring for the turbine is shown in Figure 2. The Pika T701 was connected to the Pika X3001 grid-tie inverter via Pika s REbus DC Microgrid technology (internal to the inverter in Figure 2) operating at approximately 380VDC, in accordance with the Pika T701 installation manual. The Pika X3001 was connected to the electric utility at a nominal voltage of 240VAC and frequency of 60Hz. The inverter electrical connection to the grid was done in accordance with the Pika X3001 Installation manual. Wiring between the tower top and the inverter were provided by Pika Energy and installed as part of the turbine system. Specifications for the installed wires from the tower base control panel to the grid point of common connection (PCC) are listed in Table 3. The total length of the wire run was approximately 65 meters. Figure 2. Wiring diagram of turbine and inverter installation 6
7 Table 3. System wiring summary Segment Type Approx. length Turbine to tower base junction box AWG-12 Type UF, 2 conductor + ground 16.9m Tower base junction box to inverter AWG-12 Type THHN, 2 conductor + 48m, compliant with AWEA ground minimum 8 rotor diameters Inverter to subpanel AWG-12 Type NM-B 2m 4 Test Site Description The test site is located about 1 mile south and two miles west of the town of Colby, KS. It is essentially flat with no obstructions: no site calibration is needed as per Annexes A and B of the Standard. Prevailing winds measured at the test site are from the north in winter, south in summer (see wind rose in Fig. 3); the average wind speed at 30m is over 7 m/s. Figure 4 shows an aerial view of the site, perimeter outlined in red. Figure 7 shows a plot of the turbines, obstacles and data shed positions to scale. The turbine is located 122.3m east and 30m north of the SW corner of the site. Other obstacles on the property include two 3-m tall power poles at (-21.4, 0) and (-13.4, 0), a 3-m tall data shed at (153, 30), the turbine s own met tower (110, 30) and a second wind turbine 30m tall, D=12.75m with its associated met tower, (64, 30) and (32, 30) respectively (measurements in meters east and north of the SW corner.) A dirt road forms the property s southern border; the other borders are farm implement tracks. Exclusion sectors for the Pika T701 are 60 to 120 degrees East of true North: exclusion for the wake of the turbine on its own met tower; and 238 to 301 degrees East of true North: exclusion for neighboring turbine and associated met, and two power poles on-site. The data shed does not impose exclusion sectors. A summary of the test site conditions is listed in Table 6. Note the turbine-to-met-tower distance is 0.3m greater than the 2-4D standard requirement; see Fig. 12, p. 16, and Deviations and Exceptions, p. 30. Figure 3. High Plains SWTC wind rose for May 2014-May
8 Figure 4. Aerial view of the Pika T701 and its met tower at the test site. Red circle: Pika met. Green circle: Pika tower. Blue boxes: data shed and transformer pad. Green arrow from turbine to data shed: 30.5m. From met to turbine: 12.3m center-to-center. Table 4. Sources of Noise Near the Turbine: Data collected 12 March 2015 Designation Bearing from Sound Distance from Height Width Meas. Board Sound Meas. Board [ True] [m] [m] [m] Prevailing Wind Direction 210 NA NA NA Met Tower Data Shed Neighboring Turbine Neighboring Met Tower (guyed tower) Table 5. Sources of Noise Near the Turbine: Data collected 30 March 2015 Designation Bearing from Sound Distance from Height Width Meas. Board Sound Meas. Board [ True] [m] [m] [m] Prevailing Wind Direction 322 NA NA NA Met Tower Data Shed Neighboring Turbine Neighboring Met Tower (guyed tower)
9 5 Test Equipment 5.1 Equipment Descriptions All test equipment is listed in Table 6 and was calibrated except the temperature sensor (see Exceptions); calibration sheets are included in Appendix A. Table 4 shows the equipment used and calibration due dates. Figure 8 shows placement of the meteorological instruments on the met mast (note that the pressure transducer is located near the base of the met mast). The temperature probe on the met mast employs a radiation shield. Acoustic data was collected and partly analyzed using NoiseLAB with a patch upgrade to Further analysis was conducted using NoiseLAB Batch Processor The microphone system was calibrated prior and subsequent to each data collection session using a calibrator that conforms to IEC Class I. The meteorological Data Acquisition System is comprised of National Instruments modules and LabVIEW programming. The National Instruments cards and chassis were located in the site s data shed, as was the computer running LabVIEW. End to end checks were conducted on all non acoustic data channels and results are reported in the turbine commissioning report. The acoustic data collection system was calibrated at the start of each measurement period. All measurement periods were an average of approximately 25 minutes with either the turbine operating or not operating (for background noise measurements). The longest measurement period was approximately 85 minutes with all turbines on the site parked for collection of background data. Table 6. Equipment Used for Acoustic Test Channel Instrument Make & Model Mfger Accuracy Calibration Dates Primary wind NRG 1 st Class +/-0.06 Anemometer speed Ser # m/s 3 Dec, 2013 Turbine power Ohio Semitronics PC5-059EY25 +/-0.5% of full AC Watt transducer output Ser # scale 23 Oct, 2013 Wind direction Wind Vane NRG #200P 1% N/A Turbine Status Internal to Pika Inverter Download from Pika web server Reference wind speed Anemometer NRG #40H: Ser. # % 3 Dec, 2013 Air Pressure Pressure sensor NRG BP20: Ser. # / kpa 15 Nov, 2010 Air Temperature Temperature sensor NRG #110S: Ser. #3365 +/- 1.1 C max Rain Wetness sensor Novalynx Rotor speed Not available Not available N/A Microphone BSWA Tech Model MPA 211: # Jan, 2014 Microphone Unit Bruel & Kjaer Type 4189 A Jan, 2014 Acoustic Calibrator BSAW CA111: # Jan, 2014 DAS NI 9205 (voltage: WS channel) 3,230 μv 28 Oct.,
10 DAS NI /-0.18% slope +/-0.06% offset 28 Oct., 2013 DAS NI 9421 digital negligible 5.2 Instrument Locations The primary anemometer on the meteorological tower was used to derive the standardized wind speed. This tower was located 12.3 m from the test turbine, at a bearing of 270 E of true north, with the anemometer at a height of 16.9 m. The wind vane was mounted at a height of m on the meteorological tower. The turbine tower center was 4.1 rotor diameters from the meteorological tower center, 0.3m greater than the 2-4D standard requirement; see Deviations and Exceptions. Table 7 provides the location of the microphone for the measurement sessions. Table 7. Reference Microphone Positions for Turbine and Background Measurements on 12 March, 2015 and 30 March, 2015 Reference Location (H+D/2) Minimum distance Maximum distance Actual Microphone Location Allowable Measurement Tolerance [m] [m] [m] [m] [m] ± Results 6.1 Test Conditions The analysis was done using the measured wind speed and 10-second averages of the data. The range of standardized wind speeds and wind directions used for the analysis were 4.5 to 12.5 m/s and 195 to 337 east of true north, respectively. The range of temperature and pressure were 16.5 C to 27.3 C and 91.1 kpa to 94.5 kpa, respectively. 6.2 Standardized Wind Speed Calculation Standardized wind speed, Vs, was calculated using Equation 1 below (eq. 7 in the Standard) and the values in Table 8, where Vz is the measured wind speed. 10
11 Table 8. Test Parameters Used in Wind Speed Calculations Parameter Symbol Value Hub height (m) H 16.9 Roughness length (m) z Anemometer height (m) z 16.9 Reference roughness length (m) z 0ref 0.05 Reference height (m) z ref Apparent Sound Power Level Sound pressure levels were binned by wind speed. Integer wind speeds values were calculated using interpolation between bins and extrapolation at the ends. The sound pressure levels were then background-corrected according to the Standard. Figure 3 shows the scatter plot of the sound pressure levels of the validated total (operating plus background) and background noise, along with the binned sound pressure levels. The measured and background corrected apparent sound pressure level at standardized wind speeds of 6 through 11 m/s are shown in Table 9, along with the calculated sound power levels. Figure 4 shows the sound power levels graphed against the standardized wind speed. 60 Measured Sound Pressure Level vs. Wind Speed 55 Sound Pressure Level dba Turbine Data Background Data Binned BG corrected Total Binned Total Binned Background Standardized Wind Speed m/s Figure 5. Measured and binned sound pressure levels as a function of the standardized wind speed 11
12 Table 9. Sound Pressure and Power Levels for Standardized Integer Wind Speeds (6-11 m/s) Wind Speed Bin [m/s] Total Sound Pressure Level [dba)] Background Sound Pressure Level [dba] Background Corrected Sound Pressure Level [dba] Sound Power Level [dba] Type A Uncert. [dba] Type B Uncert. [dba] Combined Uncert. [dba] sound power level dba Sound Power Level standardized wind speed m/s Figure 6. Hub-height sound power levels as a function of the standardized wind speed, with uncertainty. 6.4 One-Third Octave Analysis One-third octave levels were analyzed at standardized wind speeds of 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, and 11 m/s. The results are provided in Tables 10 and 11, and Figure 5. Table 10. One-Third Octave Analysis for Wind Speed Bins 6 Through 8 m/s Center Frequency 6 m/s One-Third Octave Levels 7 m/s One-Third Octave Levels [Hz] [dba] [dba] [dba] 20 NR NR NR 25 NR NR NR 31.5 NR NR NR 12 8 m/s One-Third Octave Levels
13 40 NR NR NR 50 NR NR NR 63 NR 27.4±2.6* NR ±2.4* NR NR ± ±2.1* 29.1±2.0* ± * 33.3± ±2.8 NR 30.1±2.1* ± * 37.2± ±2.3 NR 37.4± ± ±2.1* 35.3±2.0* ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ±2.0* 33.4± ±2.1* 28.9±2.0* 30.6±2.1* ±2.0* NR 28.4±2.0* 8000 NR NR NR NR NR NR * The difference between total and background noise was less than 6 db but greater than 3 db. A standard background correction of 1.3 db was applied according to Section 8.2 of the Standard. NR The difference between total and background noise was less than 3 db. According to Section 8.2 of the Standard, the wind turbine noise was less than the background noise. Table 11. One-Third Octave Analysis for Wind Speed Bins 9 Through 11 m/s Center Frequency 9 m/s One-Third Octave Levels 10 m/s One-Third Octave Levels [Hz] [dba] [dba] [dba] 20 NA 16.5±2.1* 20.1±2.3* 25 NA 20.0±2.2* 24.0± NA 22.3±2.1* 25.9±2.3* 40 NA NA 27.9±2.3* 50 NA NA 29.1±2.3* 63 NA NA NA 80 NA NA NA 100 NA NA NA 125 NA NA NA 160 NA NA NA 11 m/s One-Third Octave Levels 13
14 200 NA NA NA 250 NA NA NA 315 NA NA NA ±3.2 NA 42.2±2.3* ±2.2 NA 41.8±2.1* ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ±2.0* 35.1±2.0* 36.3±2.0* 5000 NA NA NA 6300 NA NA NA 8000 NA NA NA NA NA NA * The difference between total and background noise was less than 6 db but greater than 3 db. A standard background correction of 1.3 db was applied according to Section 8.2 of the Standard. NR The difference between total and background noise was less than 3 db. According to Section 8.2 of the Standard, the wind turbine noise was less than the background noise. 60 Sound Pressure Level (dba) Hz 25 Hz 31.5 Hz 40 Hz 50 Hz 63 Hz 80 Hz 100 Hz 125 Hz 160 Hz 200 Hz 250 Hz 315 Hz 400 Hz 500 Hz 630 Hz 800 Hz 1000 Hz 1250 Hz 1600 Hz 2000 Hz 2500 Hz 3150 Hz 4000 Hz 5000 Hz 6300 Hz 8000 Hz Hz frequency (Hz) 5 m/s 6 m/s 7 m/s 8 m/s 9 m/s 10 m/s 11 m/s Figure 7. Bar graph: 1/3-octave levels (db) vs frequency 14
15 6.5 Tonality During observation of the turbine in all wind speeds, no prominent tones or changes in sound were noticed. The turbine does not furl or adjust blade pitch, so no physical changes at higher wind speed would cause a change in associated noise. While it whirrs more loudly at high wind speed, the turbine does not make sounds markedly different at any particular wind speed or range of wind speeds. The tonality analysis resulted in reportable tones for xx m/s, as shown in Table 12. Figure 6. Classification of spectral lines for the 3,849 Hz tone (typical in the 10 m/s bin) Figure 7. Classification of spectral lines for the 3,921 Hz tone (typical in the 11 m/s bin) 6.6 Uncertainty The type A uncertainties for sound power levels, one-third octave levels, and tonality were calculated using the methods prescribed in the Standard. The type B uncertainty components are shown in Table 13. Var Table 13. Type B Uncertainty Components for Sound Power Levels and Tonality Description Type B Uncertainty for Sound Power Level (SPL) dba Type B Uncertainty for 1/3 Octave Levels (TOB) dba Type B Uncertainty for Tonality dba Comment UB1 Calibration Assumption; some instruments out of cal so used high value UB2 Instrument Assumption, used typical value UB3 Board The board was placed well and used the typical value UB4 Distance Assumption, used typical value UB5 Impedance Assumption, used typical value UB6 Turbulence Assumption, used typical value Calculated per IEC Ed. UB7 Wind speed, Varies with Varies with wind Varies with 1.0, , and converted to dba measured wind speed speed wind speed for SPL and TOB. Typical value for tonality UB8 Direction Assumption, used typical value UB9 Background Varies with wind speed Varies with wind speed and onethird octave center frequency bin Varies by tone Difference between measured bin center SPL and backgroundcorrected bin center SPL 15
16 7 Exceptions 7.1 Exceptions to the Standard The analysis prescribed in the standard was altered for the small wind turbine by using 10-second averages instead of 1-minute averages to better characterize the dynamic nature of this turbine. In addition, binning by wind speed was used instead of regression analysis, and the integer values were calculated by interpolating between bins and extrapolating at the ends. 7.2 Exceptions to the Quality Assurance System The primary anemometer and data acquisition modules were used past the calibration due dates. The instruments and modules were post-test calibrated. The anemometer and modules were found to be within tolerances. References International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC). (2006). Wind Turbine Generator Systems Part 11 Acoustic Noise Measurement Techniques, IEC , Ed 2.1, , Geneva, Switzerland. 16
17 Appendix A - Calibration Data Sheets for Pika T701 Test Instruments Primary Anemometer Pre-Test Calibration Figure A1. Primary anemometer manufacturer calibration sheet pg 1 of 2. 17
18 Figure A2. Primary anemometer manufacturer calibration sheet pg 2 of 2. 18
19 Secondary Anemometer Figure A3. Secondary anemometer 3 rd -party calibration sheet pg 1 of 1. 19
20 Wind Direction Vane Figure A4. Wind direction vane manufacturer specification sheet pg 1 of 2. 20
21 Figure A5. Wind direction vane manufacturer specification sheet pg 2 of 2. 21
22 Temperature Probe Figure A6. Temperature probe manufacturer specification sheet pg 1 of 2. 22
23 Figure A7. Temperature probe manufacturer specification sheet pg 2 of 2. 23
24 Pressure Transducer Figure A8. Pressure transducer manufacturer calibration sheet pg 1 of 1. 24
25 Power Transducer Figure A9. Power transducer manufacturer calibration sheet pg 1 of 3. 25
26 Figure A10. Power transducer manufacturer calibration sheet pg 2 of 3. 26
27 Figure A11. Power transducer manufacturer calibration sheet pg 3 of 3. 27
28 DAS Boards Figure A12. Voltage module (for temperature & pressure), manufacturer calibration certificate pg 1 of 1. 28
29 Figure A13. Current module (for power transducer) manufacturer calibration certificate pg 1 of 1. 29
30 Figure A14. NI 9421 digital input module (for both anemometers) manufacturer data sheet pg 1 of 9. Remaining pages available on request. 30
31 Figure A15. Calibration certificate for NoiseLab Sound Measuring System p 1 of 2. 31
32 Figure A16. Calibration certificate for NoiseLab Sound Measuring System p 2 of 2. 32
33 Figure A17. Calibration certificate for NoiseLab Microphone Unit p 1 of 2. 33
34 Figure A18. Calibration certificate for NoiseLab Microphone Unit p 2 of 2. 34
35 Figure A19. Calibration certificate for NoiseLab Acoustical Calibrator p 1 of 2. 35
36 Figure A20. Calibration certificate for NoiseLab Acoustical Calibrator p 2 of 2. 36
37 Appendix B. American Wind Energy Association Standard Acoustic Analysis The American Wind Energy Association (AWEA) standard requires that the wind turbine sound levels be measured and reported in accordance with the IEC standard, and includes the following modifications: Using a 10-second averaging period Using the measured wind speed Using the method of bins Covering a wide wind speed range as possible Describing any obvious changes in sound at high wind speeds Reporting the AWEA Rated Sound Level. The data were collected at one-second intervals and averaged by the data acquisition systems (NoiseLab for acoustic measurements and the Labview VI for all other measurements) to 10-second intervals. To ensure that the acoustic data were collected downwind from the turbine, the wind direction was filtered to assure that the measurement board was within 15 degrees of the downwind position. The data were also filtered by the provided status to determine the total (operating plus background), background, and interrupted/excluded data. The data were binned by the standardized wind speed into 1m/s wind speed bins centered on the integer wind speed. The bin centers were calculated by interpolation (and extrapolation at the ends). The AWEA Rated Sound Level is defined as: the sound level that will not be exceeded 95% of the time (assuming an average wind speed of 5 m/s); a Rayleigh wind speed distribution; 100% availability; and an observer location that is 60 m from the rotor center. This requirement defines the AWEA wind speed to be 9.8 m/s at hub height. The total and background noise for 9.8 m/s were obtained by interpolation between the 9 and 10 m/s binned values. The two values are used to obtain the background corrected sound pressure level. Next, the sound power level is calculated at the hub by adding a correction for hub height. The AWEA Rated Sound Level is then calculated by subtracting the 60-m distance correction: L AWEA = L 9.8m + 10 log (4 π ) 10 log (4 π 60 2 ) where L 9.8m is the background-corrected sound pressure level at the microphone at 9.8 m/s hub-height wind speed, 22.59m is the slant distance in meters from the hub to the ground, and the reference crosssectional area of the sound pressure is 1m 2. Hub height being 16.94m and microphone distance 14.94m, the slant distance 22.59m = ( ). Table B1. AWEA Rated Sound Level AWEA Rated Sound Level dba Combined Uncertainty dba
38 Appendix C. Uncertainty Calculations Type B uncertainty values are described in Section 6; UB7a, the wind speed uncertainty, is further described below. Type A uncertainty was calculated thus: the deviation of sound pressure level of each measurement point from the average sound pressure level within its 1-m/s wind speed bin was squared, and these numbers were summed within each wind speed bin. The square root of the sum divided by the number of data points less two is equal to the type A error: UA = ( (SPLavg SPLmeas) 2 /(N 2). The same formula was used for 1/3-octave uncertainty. The wind speed uncertainty was calculated using the same formula used for this uncertainty in the power performance report. The values below are: n= wind speed bin; U = operational characteristic error. Calibration and mounting effects are each 0.01; terrain effect is 0.02, and error from the digital data acquisition system is assumed negligible. All these errors are squared and summed; the square root of the result is multiplied by the sensitivity factor which is the difference in sound pressure levels between adjacent wind speed bins divided by the difference in wind speeds. UB7a = U(n) + ( ) U(n) 2 SPL(n) SPL(n 1) U(n) U(n 1) 38
39 Appendix D. Pictures Figure D1. Picture of the sound board during the test 12 March,
40 Figure D2. The test turbine as viewed from the reference microphone position 12 March
41 Figure D3. The test turbine as viewed from the meteorological mast 12 March
42 Figure D4. Picture of the sound board during the test 30 March,
43 Figure D5. The test turbine as viewed from the reference microphone position 30 March 2015; met mast to left. 43
44 Figure D6. The test turbine as viewed from the meteorological mast 30 March
Intertek Test Report No CRT-003 Project No. G
3933 US Route 11 Cortland, NY 13045 Telephone: (607) 753-6711 Facsimile: (607) 753-1045 www.intertek.com Intertek Project No. G100413407 Mr. Steve Turek Phone: 952-447-6064 Wind Turbine Industries, Corporation
More information7 th International Conference on Wind Turbine Noise Rotterdam 2 nd to 5 th May 2017
7 th International Conference on Wind Turbine Noise Rotterdam 2 nd to 5 th May 2017 Sound power level measurements 3.0 ir. L.M. Eilders, Peutz bv: l.eilders@peutz.nl ing. E.H.A. de Beer, Peutz bv: e.debeer@peutz.nl
More informationTest Summary Report Giraffe 2.0 Hybrid Wind-Solar Power Station - for wind: according to IEC Annex M - for solar: measurement report
Contact person Tanja Tränkle 2016-06-29 4P05805-R01 rev. 1 1 (7) Safety +46 10 516 57 19 Tanja.Trankle@sp.se Innoventum AB Morgan Widung / Marcus Ulmefors Turning Torso office 275 Lilla Varvsgatan 14 211
More information3D Nacelle Mounted Lidar in Complex Terrain
ENERGY 3D Nacelle Mounted Lidar in Complex Terrain PCWG Hamburg, Germany Paul Lawson 25.03.2015 1 DNV GL 125.03.2015 SAFER, SMARTER, GREENER Agenda Introduction and Project Background Lidar Specifications
More informationLely Aircon LA30 Wind turbine
Lely Aircon LA30 Wind turbine Summary Details for Performance, Duration and Acoustic Measurements Lely Aircon 30 Wind Turbine UK MCS Certification Summary List of contents 1. List of included Amendments...
More informationBritish Wind Energy Association Small Wind Turbine Performance and Safety Standard 29 Feb 2008
British Wind Energy Association Small Wind Turbine Performance and Safety Standard 29 Feb 2008 British Wind Energy Association Renewable Energy House 1 Aztec Row, Berners Road London, N1 0PW, UK Telephone:
More informationOldman 2 Wind Farm Limited
Decision 22676-D01-2017 Spring 2017 Post-Construction Sound Survey at Receptors B, J and K August 1, 2017 Alberta Utilities Commission Decision 22676-D01-2017 Proceeding 22676 Application 22676-A001 August
More informationWind Resource Assessment for FALSE PASS, ALASKA Site # 2399 Date last modified: 7/20/2005 Prepared by: Mia Devine
813 W. Northern Lights Blvd. Anchorage, AK 99503 Phone: 907-269-3000 Fax: 907-269-3044 www.aidea.org/wind.htm Wind Resource Assessment for FALSE PASS, ALASKA Site # 2399 Date last modified: 7/20/2005 Prepared
More informationWind Resource Assessment for NOME (ANVIL MOUNTAIN), ALASKA Date last modified: 5/22/06 Compiled by: Cliff Dolchok
813 W. Northern Lights Blvd. Anchorage, AK 99503 Phone: 907-269-3000 Fax: 907-269-3044 www.akenergyauthority.org SITE SUMMARY Wind Resource Assessment for NOME (ANVIL MOUNTAIN), ALASKA Date last modified:
More informationThe Wind Resource: Prospecting for Good Sites
The Wind Resource: Prospecting for Good Sites Bruce Bailey, President AWS Truewind, LLC 255 Fuller Road Albany, NY 12203 bbailey@awstruewind.com Talk Topics Causes of Wind Resource Impacts on Project Viability
More informationWIND DATA REPORT. Paxton, MA
WIND DATA REPORT Paxton, MA July 1, 2011 September 30, 2011 Prepared for Massachusetts Clean Energy Center 55 Summer Street, 9th Floor Boston, MA 02110 by Eric Morgan James F. Manwell Anthony F. Ellis
More informationLONG TERM SITE WIND DATA ANNUAL REPORT. Mass Turnpike Authority Blandford, MA
LONG TERM SITE WIND DATA ANNUAL REPORT Mass Turnpike Authority Blandford, MA July 1, 2012 June 30, 2013 Prepared for Massachusetts Clean Energy Center 55 Summer Street, 9th Floor Boston, MA 02110 by Dylan
More informationPower curves - use of spinner anemometry. Troels Friis Pedersen DTU Wind Energy Professor
Power curves - use of spinner anemometry Troels Friis Pedersen DTU Wind Energy Professor Spinner anemometry using the airflow over the spinner to measure wind speed, yaw misalignment and flow inclination
More informationNational Renewable Energy Laboratory. Wind Resource Data Summary Guam Naval Ordnance Annex Data Summary and Retrieval for November 2009
National Renewable Energy Laboratory Wind Resource Data Summary Guam Naval Ordnance Annex Data Summary and Retrieval for November 2009 Prepared for: National Renewable Energy Laboratory 1617 Cole Boulevard
More informationLiDAR Application to resource assessment and turbine control
ENERGY LiDAR Application to resource assessment and turbine control Dr. Avishek Kumar The New Zealand Wind Energy Conference 13 th April 2016 1 SAFER, SMARTER, GREENER Agenda What is LiDAR? Remote Sensing
More informationDraft Kivalina Wind Resource Report
Draft Kivalina Wind Resource Report Kivalina aerial photo by Doug Vaught, July 2011 May 31, 2012 Douglas Vaught, P.E. dvaught@v3energy.com V3 Energy, LLC Eagle River, Alaska Draft Kivalina Wind Resource
More informationAtqasuk Wind Resource Report
Atqasuk Wind Resource Report Report by: Douglas Vaught, P.E., V3 Energy LLC, Eagle River, Alaska Date of Report: August 26, 2010 Atqasuk met tower; D. Vaught photo Contents Summary... 2 Test Site Location...
More informationDETERMINATION OF SOUND POWER LEVEL OF A TRANSFORMER
DETERMINATION OF SOUND POWER LEVEL OF A TRANSFORMER Prepared for: McLean s Mountain Wind GP Inc. 30 St. Clair Avenue West, 12 th Floor Toronto, ON M4V 3A1 November 20, 2014 1 INTRODUCTION HGC Engineering
More informationWIND DATA REPORT. Mt. Lincoln Pelham, MA
WIND DATA REPORT Mt. Lincoln Pelham, MA May 2009 to April 2010 Prepared for Massachusetts Department of Energy Resources 100 Cambridge Street, Suite 1020 Boston, MA 02114 by Jonathan D. Black James F.
More informationSite Summary. Wind Resource Summary. Wind Resource Assessment For King Cove Date Last Modified: 8/6/2013 By: Rich Stromberg & Holly Ganser
Site Summary Wind Resource Assessment For King Cove Date Last Modified: 8/6/2013 By: Rich Stromberg & Holly Ganser Station ID: 2857 Latitude: 55 7 45.8 N Longitude: 162 16 10.6 W Tower Type: 30 m NRG Tall
More informationPROJECT CYCLOPS: THE WAY FORWARD IN POWER CURVE MEASUREMENTS?
Title Authors: Organisation PROJECT CYCLOPS: THE WAY FORWARD IN POWER CURVE MEASUREMENTS? Simon Feeney(1), Alan Derrick(1), Alastair Oram(1), Iain Campbell(1), Gail Hutton(1), Greg Powles(1), Chris Slinger(2),
More informationSaint Mary s, Alaska Wind Resource Report (for Pitka s Point and Saint Mary s met towers)
Saint Mary s, Alaska Wind Resource Report (for Pitka s Point and Saint Mary s met towers) Report written by: Douglas Vaught, P.E., V3 Energy, LLC Date of Report: February 9, 2009 Doug Vaught photo Summary
More informationOperating Manual for the Evance Iskra R9000 Wind Turbine
L3 CS-01 Operating Manual Operating Manual for the Evance Iskra R9000 Wind Turbine //Level 3 Procedures/L3-CS-01 Operating Manual Date of Issue : 8 th December 2009 Page 1 of 13 Description Author Checked
More informationMeasuring power performance with a Wind Iris 4- beam in accordance with EUDP procedure
Measuring power performance with a Wind Iris 4- beam in accordance with EUDP procedure This document evaluates the applicability of the EUDP procedure for wind turbine measuring power performance using
More informationThe World Of Weather Data
Thies CLIMA assures innovation and quality in environmental sensors The World Of Weather Data Page:1 A closer look at Thies Clima Numbers and Facts: Founded in 1945 approx. 100 Employees Worldwide Agents
More informationWind Project Siting & Resource Assessment
Wind Project Siting & Resource Assessment David DeLuca, Project Manager AWS Truewind, LLC 463 New Karner Road Albany, NY 12205 ddeluca@awstruewind.com www.awstruewind.com AWS Truewind - Overview Industry
More informationRural Small Wind Energy:
Rural Small Wind Energy: Resource Overview and System Components Phil Hofmeyer, Ph.D. Asst. Professor of Renewable Energy Morrisville State College MVCC Small Wind Energy Conference June 27, 2009 Hi, I
More informationWind turbine noise at neighbor dwellings, comparing calculations and measurements
Wind turbine noise at neighbor dwellings, comparing calculations and measurements Rune EGEDAL 1 ; Morten Bording HANSEN 2 ; Lars Sommer SØNDERGAARD 3 1, 2, 3 DELTA a part of FORCE Technology, Aarhus Denmark
More informationWIND DATA REPORT. Bourne Water District
WIND DATA REPORT Bourne Water District July to September 2010 Prepared for Massachusetts Clean Energy Center 55 Summer Street, 9th Floor Boston, MA 02110 by Dylan Chase James F. Manwell Utama Abdulwahid
More informationWIND DATA REPORT. Mt. Tom
WIND DATA REPORT Mt. Tom September 1, 2003 November 31, 2003 Prepared for Massachusetts Technology Collaborative 7 North Drive Westborough, MA 0181 by James F. Manwell Anthony F. Ellis Taylor Geer January
More informationWIND DATA REPORT. Mass Turnpike Authority Blandford, MA
WIND DATA REPORT Mass Turnpike Authority Blandford, MA October 2011 December 2011 Prepared for Massachusetts Clean Energy Center 55 Summer Street, 9th Floor Boston, MA 02110 by Preeti Verma James F. Manwell
More informationKodiak, Alaska Site 1 Wind Resource Report for Kodiak Electric Association
Kodiak, Alaska Site 1 Wind Resource Report for Kodiak Electric Association Report written by: Douglas Vaught, V3 Energy LLC, Eagle River, AK Date of report: August 23, 2006 Photo Doug Vaught General Site
More informationBuckland Wind Resource Report
Buckland Wind Resource Report By: Douglas Vaught, P.E., V3 Energy LLC, Eagle River, Alaska Date: September 17, 2010 Buckland met tower; D. Vaught photo Contents Summary... 2 Test Site Location... 2 Photographs...
More informationInfluence of wind direction on noise emission and propagation from wind turbines
Influence of wind direction on noise emission and propagation from wind turbines Tom Evans and Jonathan Cooper Resonate Acoustics, 97 Carrington Street, Adelaide, South Australia 5000 ABSTRACT Noise predictions
More informationPitka s Point, Alaska Wind Resource Report
Pitka s Point, Alaska Wind Resource Report Pitka s Point met tower, photo by Doug Vaught April 25, 2012 Douglas Vaught, P.E. V3 Energy, LLC Eagle River, Alaska Page 2 Summary The wind resource measured
More informationWIND DATA REPORT. Paxton, MA
WIND DATA REPORT Paxton, MA September 1 2003 November 30 2003 by James F. Manwell Anthony F. Ellis Kai Wu April 15, 2004 Renewable Energy Research Laboratory 160 Governors Drive, www.ceere.org/rerl (413)
More informationLONG TERM SITE WIND DATA ANNUAL REPORT. Paxton, MA
LONG TERM SITE WIND DATA ANNUAL REPORT Paxton, MA July 1, 2012 June 30, 2013 Prepared for Massachusetts Clean Energy Center Summer Street, 9th Floor Boston, MA 021 by Dylan D. Chase James F. Manwell Anthony
More informationLONG TERM SITE WIND DATA QUARTERLY REPORT. Bishop and Clerks
LONG TERM SITE WIND DATA QUARTERLY REPORT Bishop and Clerks January 1, 2012 March 31, 2012 Prepared for Massachusetts Clean Energy Center 55 Summer Street, 9th Floor Boston, MA 02110 by Frederick Letson
More informationLONG TERM SITE WIND DATA QUARTERLY REPORT. Bishop and Clerks
LONG TERM SITE WIND DATA QUARTERLY REPORT Bishop and Clerks April 1, 2012 June 30, 2012 Prepared for Massachusetts Clean Energy Center 55 Summer Street, 9th Floor Boston, MA 02110 by Frederick Letson James
More informationMeteorological Measurements OWEZ
Meteorological Measurements OWEZ Half year report - 01-07-2008-31-12-2008 H. Korterink P.J. Eecen J.W. Wagenaar ECN-E--09-018 OWEZ_R_121_20080701-20081231_WIND_RESOURCE_2008_2 Abstract NoordzeeWind carries
More informationLONG TERM SITE WIND DATA ANNUAL REPORT. Bishop & Clerks
LONG TERM SITE WIND DATA ANNUAL REPORT Bishop & Clerks July 1, 2012 June 30, 2013 Prepared for Massachusetts Clean Energy Center 55 Summer Street, 9th Floor Boston, MA 02110 by Frederick Letson James F.
More informationMeteorological Measurements OWEZ
Meteorological Measurements OWEZ Half year report 01-01-2008-30-06-2008 H. Korterink P.J. Eecen ECN-E--08-062 OWEZ_R_121_20080101-20080630_wind_resource_2008_1 Abstract NoordzeeWind carries out an extensive
More informationKake, Alaska Wind Resource Report
Kake, Alaska Wind Resource Report Kake met tower, photo provided by SEACC January 6, 2012 Douglas Vaught, P.E. V3 Energy, LLC Eagle River, Alaska Kake, Alaska Met Tower Wind Resource Report Page 2 Project
More informationWIND DATA REPORT. Mass Turnpike Authority Blandford, MA
WIND DATA REPORT Mass Turnpike Authority Blandford, MA April 2012 June 2012 Prepared for Massachusetts Clean Energy Center 55 Summer Street, 9th Floor Boston, MA 02110 by Preeti Verma James F. Manwell
More informationValidation of Measurements from a ZephIR Lidar
Validation of Measurements from a ZephIR Lidar Peter Argyle, Simon Watson CREST, Loughborough University, Loughborough, United Kingdom p.argyle@lboro.ac.uk INTRODUCTION Wind farm construction projects
More informationEvaluation of wind flow with a nacelle-mounted, continuous wave wind lidar
Downloaded from orbit.dtu.dk on: Jun 30, 2018 Evaluation of wind flow with a nacelle-mounted, continuous wave wind lidar Medley, John; Barker, Will; Harris, Mike; Pitter, Mark; Slinger, Chris; Mikkelsen,
More informationTOPICS TO BE COVERED
UNIT-3 WIND POWER TOPICS TO BE COVERED 3.1 Growth of wind power in India 3.2 Types of wind turbines Vertical axis wind turbines (VAWT) and horizontal axis wind turbines (HAWT) 3.3 Types of HAWTs drag and
More informationWindcube FCR measurements
Windcube FCR measurements Principles, performance and recommendations for use of the Flow Complexity Recognition (FCR) algorithm for the Windcube ground-based Lidar Summary: As with any remote sensor,
More informationINSTRUCTION MANUAL. Microphone Type 4966 for Hand held Analyzer Types 2250, 2250 L and Supplement to Instruction Manual BE 1712
INSTRUCTION MANUAL Microphone Type 4966 for Hand held Analyzer Types 2250, 2250 L and 2270 Supplement to Instruction Manual BE 1712 BE 1897 11 English Microphone Type 4966 for Hand-held Analyzer Types
More informationWind Data Verification Report Arriga 50m
Page 1 of 11 Site Name Site Details 9531 - Arriga 5m Arriga 5m Date/Time of report generation 27/11/212 4:22 PM Site Number 9531 Mast Height 5m Mast Location 32568 E 811256 N Coordinate System UTM 55K
More informationWIND DATA REPORT. Bishop and Clerks
WIND DATA REPORT Bishop and Clerks March 1, 2004 May 31, 2004 Prepared for Massachusetts Technology Collaborative 75 North Drive Westborough, MA 01581 by James F. Manwell Anthony L. Rogers Anthony F. Ellis
More informationLONG TERM SITE WIND DATA ANNUAL REPORT WBZ
LONG TERM SITE WIND DATA ANNUAL REPORT WBZ July 1, 2012 June 30, 2013 Prepared for Massachusetts Clean Energy Center 55 Summer Street, 9th Floor Boston, MA 02110 by Dylan D. Chase James F. Manwell Anthony
More informationTesting and Validation of the Triton Sodar
Testing and Validation of the Triton Sodar September 24, 2008 AWEA Resource Assessment Workshop Ron Nierenberg, Consulting Meteorologist Liz Walls, Second Wind Inc. Ron Consulting Nierenberg Meteorologist
More informationStatus: Rev: Comments Date: Author: Reviewer:
MT EMERALD WIND FARM REVISED A-WEIGHTED NOISE ASSESSMENT Rp 002 R01 2015545ML 30 January 2017 6 Gipps Street Collingwood VIC 3066 Australia T: +613 9416 1855 ABN: 53 470 077 191 www.marshallday.com Project:
More informationInfluence of non-standard atmospheric conditions on turbine noise levels near wind farms
Influence of non-standard atmospheric conditions on turbine noise levels near wind farms Jonathan COOPER 1 ; Tom EVANS 1 ; Vahid ALAMSHAH 1 1 Resonate Acoustics, Australia ABSTRACT This paper investigates
More informationWIND DATA REPORT. Vinalhaven
WIND DATA REPORT Vinalhaven January - December, 2003 Prepared for Fox Islands Electric Cooperative by Anthony L. Rogers May 12, 2004 Report template version 1.1 Renewable Energy Research Laboratory 160
More informationAN ISOLATED SMALL WIND TURBINE EMULATOR
AN ISOLATED SMALL WIND TURBINE EMULATOR Md. Arifujjaman Graduate Student Seminar: Master of Engineering Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science Memorial University of Newfoundland St. John s, NL, Canada
More informationLONG TERM SITE WIND DATA QUARTERLY REPORT. Bishop and Clerks
LONG TERM SITE WIND DATA QUARTERLY REPORT Bishop and Clerks July 1, 2010 September 30, 2010 Prepared for Massachusetts Clean Energy Center 55 Summer Street, 9th Floor Boston, MA 02110 by Frederick Letson
More informationCalibration Summary of Test Report No.: Sample
Calibration Summary of Test Report No.:30043 Rion Type: NL52/EX Serial no: 00732122 Customer: Scantek, Inc. Address: 6430 Dobbin Rd., Suite C, Columbia MD, 21045 Contact Person: Mariana Buzduga Phone No.:
More informationUncertainties in Environmental Noise Assessments ISO 1996, Effects of Instrument Class and Residual Sound
Uncertainties in Environmental Noise Assessments ISO 1996, Effects of Instrument Class and Residual Sound Douglas Manvell, Erik Aflalo Brüel & Kjær Sound & Vibration A/S, Skodsborgvej 307, DK-2850 Nærum,
More informationRadiation characteristics of noise generated from a wind turbine
Acoust. Sci. & Tech. 36, 5 (15) PAPER #15 The Acoustical Society of Japan Radiation characteristics of noise generated from a wind turbine Yasuaki Okada 1;, Koichi Yoshihisa 1;y, Kazuki Higashi 2;z and
More informationWind Regimes 1. 1 Wind Regimes
Wind Regimes 1 1 Wind Regimes The proper design of a wind turbine for a site requires an accurate characterization of the wind at the site where it will operate. This requires an understanding of the sources
More informationEWEA Noise Wind Turbine Noise Workshop
EWEA Noise Wind Turbine Noise Workshop Pre- and Post Construction Noise Measurements Dr Andy McKenzie Hayes McKenzie Partnership Ltd Salisbury & Machynlleth UK Wind Turbine Noise Planning ETSU-R-97 X db
More informationWind Turbine Noise Measurements How are Results influenced by different Methods of deriving Wind Speeds? Sylvia Broneske
INTERNOISE 2014 16 19 November in Melbourne, Australia Wind Turbine Noise Measurements How are Results influenced by different Methods of deriving Wind Speeds? Sylvia Broneske Hayes McKenzie Partnership
More informationSUPPLEMENTARY GUIDANCE NOTE 4: WIND SHEAR
A GOOD PRACTICE GUIDE TO THE APPLICATION OF ETSU-R-97 FOR THE ASSESSMENT AND RATING OF WIND TURBINE NOISE SUPPLEMENTARY GUIDANCE NOTE 4: WIND SHEAR ISSUE 1 JULY 2014 Page 1 of 14 PREFACE This document
More informationSmall Scale Wind Technologies Part 2. Centre for Renewable Energy at Dundalk IT CREDIT
Small Scale Wind Technologies Part 2 Centre for Renewable Energy at Dundalk IT CREDIT 1 Part 2 Small and large scale wind turbine technologies 2 Overview of small scale grid connected system Wind Turbine
More information2MW baseline wind turbine: model development and verification (WP1) The University of Tokyo & Hitachi, Ltd.
2MW baseline wind turbine: model development and verification (WP1) The University of Tokyo & Hitachi, Ltd. Downwind turbine technology, IEA Wind Task 40 First Progress Meeting, Tokyo, Japan 11 Dec, 2017
More informationVISUAL AIDS FOR DENOTING OBSTACLES
CHAPTER 6. VISUAL AIDS FOR DENOTING OBSTACLES 6.1 Objects to be marked and/or lighted Note. The marking and/or lighting of obstacles is intended to reduce hazards to aircraft by indicating the presence
More informationCORRELATION EFFECTS IN THE FIELD CLASSIFICATION OF GROUND BASED REMOTE WIND SENSORS
CORRELATION EFFECTS IN THE FIELD CLASSIFICATION OF GROUND BASED REMOTE WIND SENSORS Will Barker (1), Julia Gottschall (2), Michael Harris (3), John Medley (4), Edward Burin des Roziers (5), Chris Slinger
More informationLab 1c Isentropic Blow-down Process and Discharge Coefficient
058:080 Experimental Engineering Lab 1c Isentropic Blow-down Process and Discharge Coefficient OBJECTIVES - To study the transient discharge of a rigid pressurized tank; To determine the discharge coefficients
More informationIDL01. Battery Powered Precision Digital Gauge for Leak Testing. Stainless Steel Sensor. class 0.05
IDL0 Battery Powered Precision Digital Gauge for Leak Testing Stainless Steel Sensor class 0.05 Nominal pressure from 0 00 mbar up to 0... 00 bar Special characteristics modular sensor concept data logger
More informationESB TONAL NOISE ASSESSMENT. 30 May West Offaly Power Station. Report Author: Stephen Kearney
Allegro Acoustics Limited, Unit 2A Riverside, Tallaght Business Park, Tallaght, Dublin 24 Tel/Fax: +353 (0) 1 4140485 ESB West Offaly Power Station TONAL NOISE ASSESSMENT 30 May 2016 Report Author: Stephen
More informationDick Bowdler Acoustic Consultant
Dick Bowdler Acoustic Consultant 01383 882 644 077 8535 2534 dick@dickbowdler.co.uk WIND SHEAR AND ITS EFFECT ON NOISE ASSESSMENT OF WIND TURBINES June 2009 The Haven, Low Causeway, Culross, Fife. KY12
More informationWind tunnel acoustic testing of wind generated noise on building facade elements
See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/307638896 Wind tunnel acoustic testing of wind generated noise on building facade elements
More informationWIND DATA REPORT. Ragged Mt Maine
WIND DATA REPORT Ragged Mt Maine December 1 st 2007 to February 29 th 2007 by James R. Browning James F. Manwell Utama Abdulwahid Anthony F. Ellis April 10, 2008 Report template version 3.1 Renewable Energy
More informationMeasurement and simulation of the flow field around a triangular lattice meteorological mast
Measurement and simulation of the flow field around a triangular lattice meteorological mast Matthew Stickland 1, Thomas Scanlon 1, Sylvie Fabre 1, Andrew Oldroyd 2 and Detlef Kindler 3 1. Department of
More informationSite Description: LOCATION DETAILS Report Prepared By: Tower Site Report Date
Wind Resource Summary for Holyoke Site Final Report Colorado Anemometer Loan Program Monitoring Period:: 6/21/26 /6/27 Report Date: December 2, 27 Site Description: The site is 17.4 miles south of the
More informationWind farm performance
Wind farm performance Ali Marjan Wind Energy Submission date: June 2016 Supervisor: Lars Sætran, EPT Norwegian University of Science and Technology Department of Energy and Process Engineering Wind
More informationSession 2a: Wind power spatial planning techniques. IRENA Global Atlas Spatial planning techniques 2-day seminar
Session 2a: Wind power spatial planning techniques IRENA Global Atlas Spatial planning techniques 2-day seminar Central questions we want to answer After having identified those areas which are potentially
More informationWind Farm Power Performance Test, in the scope of the IEC
Wind Farm Power Performance Test, in the scope of the IEC 61400-12.3 Helder Carvalho 1 (helder.carvalho@megajoule.pt) Miguel Gaião 2 (miguel.gaiao@edp.pt) Ricardo Guedes 1 (ricardo.guedes@megajoule.pt)
More informationCalibration of wind direction sensors at Deutsche WindGuard Wind Tunnel Services GmbH
Calibration of wind direction sensors at Deutsche WindGuard Wind Tunnel Services GmbH Deutsche WindGuard Wind Tunnel Services GmbH Oldenburger Str. 65 26316 Varel Germany Project No.: VT180588 Report No.:
More informationSite Description: Tower Site
Wind Resource Summary for Elizabeth Site Final Report Colorado Anemometer Loan Program Monitoring Period: 7/3/6 /15/7 Report Date: December 22, 7 Site Description: The site is.6 miles northeast of the
More informationHow Does A Wind Turbine's Energy Production Differ from Its Power Production? 1
Siting Wind Power: Wind Power Curves & Community Considerations (Teacher Notes) (Assessing the Feasibility of Wind Power for Pennsylvania) Notes on Part 1 A Beaufort scale is included on the next page
More informationMICROPHONE WIND SPEED LIMITS DURING WIND FARM NOISE MEASUREMENTS
MICROPHONE WIND SPEED LIMITS DURING WIND FARM NOISE MEASUREMENTS Abstract Jon Cooper 1 and Tom Evans 2 1 Resonate Acoustics, Level 1/23 Peel St, Adelaide SA 5000, Australia Email: jon.cooper@resonateacoustics.com
More informationSession 2: Wind power spatial planning techniques
Session 2: Wind power spatial planning techniques IRENA Global Atlas Spatial planning techniques 2-day seminar Central questions we want to answer After having identified those areas which are potentially
More informationWIND DATA REPORT. Swan s Island, ME
WIND DATA REPORT Swan s Island, ME June 1, 2009 August 31, 2009 Prepared for US Department of Energy by Daniel T. Grip Utama Abdulwahid James F. Manwell Anthony F. Ellis September 17, 2009 Report template
More information3D Turbulence at the Offshore Wind Farm Egmond aan Zee J.W. Wagenaar P.J. Eecen
3D Turbulence at the Offshore Wind Farm Egmond aan Zee J.W. Wagenaar P.J. Eecen OWEZ_R_121_3Dturbulence_20101008 ECN-E--10-075 OCTOBER 2010 Abstract NoordzeeWind carries out an extensive measurement and
More informationAvailable online at ScienceDirect. Energy Procedia 53 (2014 )
Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect Energy Procedia 53 (2014 ) 156 161 EERA DeepWind 2014, 11th Deep Sea Offshore Wind R&D Conference Results and conclusions of a floating-lidar offshore
More informationUSER S MANUAL 1000W and 2000W
USER S MANUAL 1000W and 2000W 1108 Summit Avenue, Suite 8 Plano, TX 75074 866-WND-PWRD www.acgreenenergy.com CONTENTS Model & Parameters List -------------------------------------------------------------------------
More informationGeneral Specification. V MW 60 Hz OptiSlip Wind Turbine. Item no R3 Class 1
General Specification V80 1.8 MW 60 Hz OptiSlip Wind Turbine Item no. 944411.R3 Class 1 (6a) Date: 28. May 2002 Class: 1 Item no.: 944411.R3 Page: 2 of 18 Contents... Page 1. Introduction...3 2. Wind Climate...3
More informationDETRMINATION OF A PLUNGER TYPE WAVE MAKER CHARACTERISTICE IN A TOWING TANK
The 9 th International Conference on Coasts, Ports and Marine Structures (ICOPMAS 2010) 29 Nov.-1 Dec. 2010 (Tehran) DETRMINATION OF A PLUNGER TYPE WAVE MAKER CHARACTERISTICE IN A TOWING TANK sayed mohammad
More informationKodiak, Alaska Site 1 Wind Resource Report
Kodiak, Alaska Site 1 Wind Resource Report Report written by: Douglas Vaught, P.E., V3 Energy LLC, Eagle River, AK Date of report: March 16, 2007 Photo by Doug Vaught, V3 Energy LLC Summary Information
More informationWind Resource Assessment for DEADHORSE, ALASKA
813 W. Northern Lights Blvd. Anchorage, AK 99503 Phone: 907-269-3000 Fax: 907-269-3044 www.akenergyauthority.org Wind Resource Assessment for DEADHORSE, ALASKA Date last modified: 4/18/2006 Compiled by:
More informationShaktoolik, Alaska Wind Resource Report
Report written by: Douglas Vaught, P.E., V3 Energy, LLC Date of Report: November 3, 2008 Photo Doug Vaught V3 Energy, LLC 1 Summary Information The wind resource in Shaktoolik shows very good potential
More informationAC : MEASUREMENT OF HYDROGEN IN HELIUM FLOW
AC 2010-2145: MEASUREMENT OF HYDROGEN IN HELIUM FLOW Randy Buchanan, University of Southern Mississippi Christopher Winstead, University of Southern Mississippi Anton Netchaev, University of Southern Mississippi
More informationWind Resource Assessment for SAINT PAUL, ALASKA
813 W. Northern Lights Blvd. Anchorage, AK 99503 Phone: 907-269-3000 Fax: 907-269-3044 www.akenergyauthority.org Wind Resource Assessment for SAINT PAUL, ALASKA Date last modified: 3/1/2006 Compiled by:
More informationA noise generation and propagation model for large wind farms
Wind Farm Noise: Paper ICA2016-86 A noise generation and propagation model for large wind farms Franck Bertagnolio (a) (a) DTU Wind Energy, Denmark, frba@dtu.dk Abstract A wind turbine noise calculation
More informationWind Project Siting and Permitting Blaine Loos
Wind Project Siting and Permitting Blaine Loos Energy Project Analyst Center for Wind Energy at James Madison University Wind Project Siting and Permitting The Energy in Wind Resource Assessment (Macro-siting)
More informationTutorial for the. Total Vertical Uncertainty Analysis Tool in NaviModel3
Tutorial for the Total Vertical Uncertainty Analysis Tool in NaviModel3 May, 2011 1. Introduction The Total Vertical Uncertainty Analysis Tool in NaviModel3 has been designed to facilitate a determination
More informationTorrild - WindSIM Case study
Torrild - WindSIM Case study Note: This study differs from the other case studies in format, while here another model; WindSIM is tested as alternative to the WAsP model. Therefore this case should be
More information