MEASURING THE QUALITY OF THE PEDESTRIAN ENVIRONMENT: TOWARDS AN APPROPRIATE ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY. Prepared by Andrew Devlin MA Candidate
|
|
- Joshua Ferguson
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 MEASURING THE QUALITY OF THE PEDESTRIAN ENVIRONMENT: TOWARDS AN APPROPRIATE ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY Prepared by Andrew Devlin MA Candidate Presented to Dr. Lawrence Frank PLAN 548Q School of Community and Regional Planning 7 March 2008 The University of British Columbia
2 ABSTRACT In order to plan for more walkable environments, methods are required that allow planners and decision-makers to effectively identify and assess the elements of the built environment that support or detract from walking. The existing pedestrian levelof-service methodology is critiqued and demonstrated to be an inappropriate tool to assess the pedestrian environment. A more accurate and sensitive tool would incorporate and account for the various micro-scale environmental factors that define the walking environment. To improve existing assessment processes, municipalities will be required to identify what elements need to be measured, how to measure these elements and, finally, incorporating them into an appropriate assessment framework. The literature and progressive practical examples like the For Collins pedestrian LOS methodology provide a framework for how to develop an appropriate tool. Page 2
3 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 4 DEFINING AND DISSECTING THE PEDESTRIAN ENVIRONMENT 4 MEASURING THE PEDESTRIAN ENVIRONMENT 6 Existing Approach 6 Strengths and Weaknesses of Existing Approach 7 ARTICULATING A NEW DIRECTION 8 What Needs To Be Measured? 9 How Should These Elements Be Measured? 9 What Should A New Methodology Look Like? 10 CASE STUDY 11 Fort Collins, Colorado A Progressive Pedestrian LOS 11 CONCLUSIONS 12 REFERENCES 12 Page 3
4 INTRODUCTION With the explosion of Smart Growth, New Urbanism and neo-traditional urban design ideologies during the past decade, it has become common for many municipal governments and planning agencies to cite their commitment towards planning for the pedestrian and nonmotorized traveler (Benfield, 2003). In order to appropriately plan for more walkable environments, methods are required that allow planners and decision-makers to effectively identify and assess the elements of the built environment that support or detract from walking. (Muraleetharan and Hagiwara, 2007). The quality of the pedestrian environment has been measured for many years throughout North American and Europe using the Level-of-Service (LOS) approach. Debate exists, however, over the appropriateness of existing LOS methods to capture the numerous factors that contribute to how walkable a streetscape may be perceived to be (Clifton et al., 2007). As a result, there is concern that inappropriate policy and investment initiatives will be directed at the pedestrian environment (Landis et al., 2001). Recognizing this situation, the goal of this paper is to summarize the dialogue and debate on pedestrian level of service measurements and lend ideas on how the process can be improved. The paper begins with a discussion on the myriad of factors and elements that may contribute to a walkable environment. It then draws on these to assess and critique the existing methodologies that measure the quality of the pedestrian environment. The last section will focus on identifying shortcomings of the existing tools and measures and ways to improve the process will be discussed and recommended. DEFINING AND DISSECTING THE PEDESTRIAN ENVIRONMENT The literature on what elements come together to define a walkable urban environment is quite extensive. A majority of this research limit measures of interest to more macro-scale elements such as land use mix, density, and street patterns (Frank and Engelke, 2001; Greenwald and Boarnet, 2001; Handy et al., 2002; Saelens et al., 2003). This body of work has generally found that areas with higher residential and commercial densities, higher intersection densities, and a functional mixing of land uses in close proximity to where people live and work are associated with higher levels of walking and cycling (Frank and Pivo, 1994; Frank et al., 2005). What these Page 4
5 studies fail to capture, however, are the micro-scale environmental elements that frame the suitability for walking in a given area. These may include the street façade and sidewalk treatments, building site design and street furniture (Figure 1) (Zacharias, 2001). There is an emerging argument that these elements and other like them have a strong influence on how the pedestrian perceives the walking environment (Giles-Corti and Donovan, 2003). This argument is justified by Rapoport (1987) who states that because pedestrians move at a much slower pace than vehicles they are more aware and sensitive to their surroundings. As a result, pedestrians require a high number of noticeable differences in the form of street furniture, destinations, building types and styles and signage to make the walking environment enjoyable. Figure 1: Pedestrian Friendly Street in Aspen, CO. Note pedestrian-scale signage, building setback, placement of trees and furniture and sidewalk treatment. Source: PPS ( A number of papers have attempted to articulate and assess the relative influence of various micro-scale built environment elements that may affect a pedestrian s assessment of the quality of the walking environment. Craig et al. (2002) describes 18 elements that may lend to creating a walkable environment. These included visual interest (i.e. type and variety of buildings and building design), traffic threats (i.e. speed of and separation from traffic), and the inclusiveness of pedestrians (i.e. pedestrian-oriented buildings, signage and amenities). Owen et al (2004) developed a comprehensive list of over 60 micro-scale elements that influence walking, including safety from traffic, presence of continuous sidewalks, presence of street crossings, degree of crowding, sidewalk environment (i.e. seating, garbage can, planter boxes), route directness, site design, and visual interest and stimuli. Pikora et al (2002) also identifies over 40 environmental components that contribute to overall functionality, safety, aesthetics, and destinations. The full lists of environmental Page 5
6 elements and components identified by Craig et al. (2002) and Owen et al. (2004) are found in Appendix A. Studies have been conducted that offer empirical evidence of the influence of micro-scale environmental elements on defining the quality of the pedestrian environment. Research by Humpel et al. (2002), Giles-Corti and Donovan (2003), and Saelens et al. (2003) found highly walkable environments are positively correlated with strong aesthetic qualities, higher perceptions of pedestrian safety and access to appropriate facilities. Brownson et al. (2004) surveyed residents in the San Diego area and demonstrated that characteristics like a pedestrian-oriented walking environment, stimulating neighbourhood aesthetics and neighbourhood safety contributed to a more enjoyable walking environment. These studies and other like them support the idea that what defines the quality of the pedestrian environment is complex. The presence and quality of these types of features needs to be assessed in order to better plan for successful pedestrian environments. MEASURING THE PEDESTRIAN ENVIRONMENT Existing Approach The most widely used method to assess the quality of the pedestrian environment is the pedestrian Level-of-Service (LOS) measurement (Kerridge et al., 2001). This method employs a letter scale from A to F to measure and describe the overall walking conditions of the pedestrian environment. An LOS A is considered an ideal environment while LOS F would be the worst or most unfitting for a pedestrian (Fruin, 1971). The most common application of the pedestrian LOS methodology is to measure the capacity and flow characteristics of pedestrian facilities (Petritsch et al., 2006). Here, sidewalks and pathways that have unimpeded flow and an abundance of additional capacity are considered to be the most ideal environments for pedestrians (see Figure 2). Conversely, those streetscapes or intersections characterized by high degrees of crowding are deemed to be ill suited for optimal pedestrian movement. Another common application of the pedestrian LOS methodology is to assess the pedestrian environment in terms of the ease with which streets can be crossed (presence and timing of crossing zones) and sidewalk and Page 6
7 pathway continuity (Dixon, 1996). Where more of these features exist, the better the environment is deemed to be pedestrian-friendly. These methods of assessing the built environment in terms of flow, movement and capacity have been normalized in the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM), the industry standard guidelines for evaluating the pedestrian environment (TRB, 2000). Indeed, many major United States metropolitan areas including New York City and Baltimore have adopted this methodology into their practical planning practice to assess and better plan for the pedestrian environment (Baltimore Metropolitan Council, 2004; NYC DCP, 2006). Strengths and Weaknesses of Existing Approach The more common pedestrian LOS applications outlined above have several advantages which makes their appealing to many municipalities and planning agencies. First, these methodologies are rather simple. It is relatively easy, for instance, to collect and assess data on sidewalk continuity, location of crosswalks and general flow characteristics (Petritsch et al., 2006). Second, the standardization of the pedestrian LOS that assesses flow, movement and capacity characteristics in the HCM allows planners and decision-makers to utilize pre-developed ways of assessing data and allows for easy comparison of LOS ratings from a certain place and time and other location (NYC DCP, 2006). Figure 2: Images of pedestrian LOS standards contained in the Highway Capacity Manual. LOS A is defined as the best condition. LOS F is considered the worst. Source: HCM, Numerous deficiencies and criticisms of the existing assessment approach have been identified. Research by Khisty (1994), Jaskiewicz (1999), Phillips and Guttenplan (2003), and Muraleetharan and Hagiwara (2007) points out that the existing pedestrian LOS methodologies used in many North American jurisdictions are Page 7
8 inaccurate in that they do not reflect and incorporate other important elements that aid in defining how walkable an environment is from the pedestrians perspective. These include the myriad of factors discussed in the previous section and found in Appendix A. By not incorporating and assessing these additional measures, it can be argued that the existing, more common pedestrian LOS framework being used may actually reinforce the perpetuation of plans, policies and initiatives that do not favour walking and nonmotorized transportation. For instance, using these measures, more traditional suburban streets and arterials can be developed with a continuous sidewalk or pathway system and a large number of strategically placed crosswalks can register a high level of service rating although walking may actually be quite impractical and unexciting due to wide road widths, homogenous and uninteresting site design, and the lack of pedestrian amenities and signage that characterize many traditional suburban developments (Landis et al., 2001). Under current methods, street furniture like benches, signage and planter boxes are actually considered barriers that impede pedestrian flow and therefore contribute negatively to a successful pedestrian environment (NYC DCP, 2006). It would appear, then, that a complete shift in thinking about the pedestrian environment is required on the part of municipalities and planning agencies to develop and use more accurate and appropriate LOS measurements. ARTICULATING A NEW DIRECTION Despite the abundance of criticism, much of the work directed at improving the pedestrian LOS methodology is focused on strengthening the current applications of assessing pedestrian flow and the availability of pedestrian facilities and infrastructure (Baltes and Chu, 2002). Although important in certain respects, this work does little to push assessment methodologies towards a more comprehensive framework like that called for by Rapoport (1987). Where research has been directed at explicitly articulating a more appropriate way for assessing the quality of the pedestrian environment, it is scattered throughout the literature (Gallin, 2001). This section will draw on this body of work to bring together and articulate the various ideas for improving the pedestrian LOS measurement. Page 8
9 What Needs To Be Measured? There are a number of objective and subjective elements that contribute to defining the pedestrian environment (see Appendix A). It is impossible to measure, let alone know, every factor that is most important to residents who walk or cycle. Although there are currently no standard or common ways of establishing what these factors (Handy and Clifton, 2001), the literature points to several ways of collecting this information. Surveys, interviews and focus groups, for instance, can be used determine what certain streetscape elements are the most important (or not) for walking environments (Pikora et al., 2003). Surveys can be developed to ask people to consider aspects of the built environment that might support or impede walking in their neighbourhood and how the design of these and other places may be improved to facilitate walking (Day et al., 2006). Surveys, however, may take a substantial amount of time and money to undertake, something many municipalities may not have (Day et al., 2006). In their place, municipalities and agencies may turn to the literature. This paper has demonstrated that many studies have looked at which elements lend the most influence to defining walkable environments. These could be used as a foundation for what a municipality or agency may want to assess. The relatively low cost of this option may make it more appealing for many municipalities. How Should These Elements Be Measured? Many of the elements identified by pedestrians that define the quality of the walking environment can be difficult to quantify or measure (Khisty, 1994). For instance, issues may arise in how to effectively assess the visual stimulus or aesthetical qualities of a streetscape. The literature provides an established body of work that offers numerous ways to quantify or measure these subjective qualities. For instance, pedestrian safety may be measured in terms of amount of quality of pedestrian-scale lighting, the presence of clear sightlines, or the amount of street parking separating pedestrians from traffic (Hess et al., 1999; Landis et al., 2001; Chu et al., 2004). Visual and aesthetic quality may be measured by the presence of historical buildings and unique architecture, public art and street furniture and the building setback from the sidewalk/street (Gallin, 2001). Field surveys undertaken by municipal or agency staff or pedestrians themselves may be used to identify and record the pertinent built Page 9
10 environment characteristics (Day et al., 2006). It is also possible that many municipalities or agencies will already have information on many of these elements scattered throughout various departments (Handy and Clifton, 2001). In this case, it would be a matter of collecting all of the pertinent data and standardizing it into a format that will allow for a meaningful analysis. Geographic Information Systems (GIS) can be used to efficiently map and analyze the distribution of key elements like street furniture, historical buildings, crosswalks and sidewalks, and areas of on-street parking an create databases of the features (Aultman-Hall et al., 1997). Lee and Moudon (2006) used GIS to capture and map various environmental elements including the location of trees and street furniture, crosswalks and topography in a study that explored the correlates of walking and cycling. Combining different map layers of various features in a GIS enables the planner or decision-maker to produce a visual representation of where environments are more conducive to pedestrian activity and those that are not and require more immediate attention. What Should A New Methodology Look Like? The potential exists to identify and measure additional elements and factors that contribute to the quality of the pedestrian environment in a pedestrian LOS assessment tool. Recent work, however, has explore the relevance of the traditional LOS scale of measurement to effectively and accurate assess the myriad of factors that may define the pedestrian environment. Phillips and Guttenplan (2003), for instance, lament that agencies should not focus efforts to utilize the broad LOS A-F categorization. These categories often aggregate and combine various elements that contribute to a certain theme or major characteristics like safety or visual aesthetics and apply a letter grade to each one. The authors note that a variety of factors that influence the quality of the pedestrian environment may not readily lend themselves to such an aggregated and rigid scale of measurement and therefore call for tools that assess the overall quality of the pedestrian environment. Environmental audit instruments offer a potentially more comprehensive and flexible alternative. These tools allow the user to rate and evaluate individual elements of the built environment that are defined as influencing the quality of the streetscape. (Clifton et al., 2007). In this sense, they allow planners and decision-makers to pinpoint those exact elements that contribute to or detract from a walkable Page 10
11 streetscape. Audit instruments have been developed and implemented in Australia (Pikora et al., 2002) and in the United States (Day et al., 2006; Clifton et al., 2007) that allow the user to evaluate various elements of the built environment. The testing of these instruments has revealed these instruments to be relatively consistent, reliable and easy to use (Moudon and Lee, 2003). Given their potential to include countless variables that may be evaluated these instruments may result in more detailed characterization of the environment. As a result, however, they may require more time, resources and commitment to develop and administer (Clifton et al., 2007). An example of an environmental audit instrument developed by Clifton et al. (2007) is found in Appendix B. CASE STUDY Fort Collins, Colorado A Progressive Pedestrian LOS The pedestrian LOS developed for Fort Collins, Colorado embodies many of the elements discussed in the previous section and serves as a practical example of the potential for developing and implementing progressive tools to assess the quality and performance of the pedestrian environment. In 1996, the City of Fort Collins developed a comprehensive pedestrian plan that effectively placed the needs of the pedestrian as a primary planning goal for the City. A new pedestrian LOS was seen as a key tool that would aid the City in analyzing existing pedestrian conditions and proposed public and private improvement projects (City of Fort Collins, 1996). The LOS was developed through extensive consultation work. Pedestrian focus groups, Fort Collins Transportation Board officials, Street Standards Committee, and those in attendance at numerous local workshops and outreach initiatives were allowed to actively contribute in the planning and development process. The final product assesses pedestrian conditions based on directness (measurement of walking trip length), continuity (measurement of completeness of sidewalk and pathway system), street crossings (measurement of pedestrian safety in crossing a street), visual interest and amenities (measurement of the pedestrian system attractiveness and features) and security (measurement of the pedestrian s sense of security). A variety of variables like number and location of crosswalks, building setbacks, street furniture and pedestrian lighting are included under each category. Page 11
12 The city also established threshold values for each category of measurement. These thresholds define the minimum acceptable standard for each element. They also have strong policies that require new public and private developments as well as major street improvements and redevelopment should adhere to the pedestrian LOS standards and attempt to attain the required threshold values. The Fort Collins Pedestrian LOS included in this paper in Appendix C. CONCLUSIONS Existing pedestrian LOS methodologies are entrenched in an ideology based on ease of movement and efficiency of the pedestrian system. These initiatives neglect to account for other subjective factors that are proving to be influential in defining the quality of the walking environment and, as a result, may lend to the perpetual (re) development of truly unwalkable spaces. This paper has demonstrated that potential exists to develop an appropriate quality of service assessment methodology for the pedestrian environment. To do so, three key aspects must be overcome. These are identifying what elements need to be measured, how to assess the elements and incorporating these into an appropriate assessment framework. The literature and progressive practical examples like the For Collins pedestrian LOS methodology provide a framework for how to develop an appropriate tool. It should be acknowledged, however, that substantial efforts would be required on the part of municipalities and planning agencies to initiate and undertake these projects. If municipalities wish to strive towards creating more walkable spaces, the complexity and challenge of developing an appropriate assessment framework should not deter them. REFERENCES Aultman-Hall, L., Roorda, M., & Baetz, B. W. (1997). Using GIS for evaluation of neighborhood pedestrian accessibility. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 123(1), Baltes, M. R., & Chu, X. (2002). Pedestrian level of service for midblock street crossings. Transportation Research Record, 1818, Page 12
13 Baltimore Metropolitan Council. (2004). Bicycle level of service update & pedestrian level of service evaluation. Accessed February 2008 from the World Wide Web: Benfield, F. K. (2003). Solving sprawl: Models of smart growth in communities across America. Washington, D.C.: Island Press. Brownson, R. C., Chang, J. J., Eyler, A. A., & Ainsworth, B. E. (2004). Measuring the environment for friendliness toward physical activity: A comparison of the reliability of 3 questionnaires. American Journal of Public Health, 94(3), Chu, X., Guttenplan, M., & Baltes, M. R. (2004). Why people cross where they do: The role of the street environment. Transportation Research Record, 1878, City of Fort Collins. (1996). Pedestrian Level of Service Accessed February 2008 from the World Wide Web: Clifton, K., Livismith, A., & Rodriguez, D. (2007). The development and testing of an audit for the pedestrian environment. Landscape and Urban Planning, 80(1-2), Craig, C. L., Brownson, R. C., Cragg, S. E., & Dunn, A. L. (2002). Exploring the effect of the environment on physical activity: A study examining walking to work. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 23(2S), Day, K., Boarnet, M. G., Alfonzo, M., & Forsyth, A. (2006). The Irvine ÄìMinnesota inventory to measure built environments development. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 30(2), Dixon, L. B. (1996). Bicycle and pedestrian level-of-service performance measures and standards for congestion management systems. Transportation Research Record, 1538, 1-9. Frank, L., & Engelke, P. (2001). The built environment and human activity: Exploring the impacts of urban form on public health. Journal of Planning Literature, 16(2), Frank, L., Schmid, T., Sallis, J., Chapman, J., & Saelens, B. (2005). Linking objectively measured physical activity with objectively measured urban form: Findings from SMARTRAQ. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 28(2), Frank, L. D., & Pivo, G. (1994). Impacts of mixed use and density on utilization of three modes of travel: single-occupant vehicle, transit, and walking. Transportation Research Record, 1466, Fruin, J. (1971). Pedestrian Planning and Design. New York: Metropolitan Association of Urban Designers and Environmental Planners, Inc. Page 13
14 Gallin, N. (2001). Quantifying pedestrian friendliness: Guidelines for assessing pedestrian level of service. Proceedings from Australia: Walking the 21st Century Conference. Giles-Corti, B., & Donovan, R. J. (2003). Relative influence of individual, social environmental, and physical environmental correlates of walking. American Journal of Public Health, 93(9), Greenwald, M. J., & Boarnet, M. G. (2001). The built environment as a determinant of walking behavior: Analyzing non-work pedestrian travel Portland, Oregon. Transportation Research Record, 1780, Handy, S., & Clifton, K. (2001). Evaluating neighborhood accessibility: possibilities and practicalities. Journal of Transportation and Statistics, 4(2-3), Handy, S. L., Boarnet, M. G., Ewing, R., & Killingsworth, R. E. (2002). How the built environment affects physical activity: Views from urban planning. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 23(2S), Hess, P. M., Moudon, A. V., Snyder, M. C., & Stanilov, K. (1999). Site design and pedestrian travel. Transportation Research Record, 1674, Humpel, N., Owen, N., & Leslie, E. (2002). Environmental factors associated with adults' participation in physical activity: A review. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 22 (3) Jaskiewicz, F. (2001). Pedestrian level of service based on trip quality. Proceedings from Urban Street Symposium Conference. Kerridge, J., Hine, J., & Wigan, M. (2001). Agent-based modelling of pedestrian movements: The questions that need to be asked and answered. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 28(3), Khisty, C. (1994). Evaluation of pedestrian facilities: Beyond the level-of-service concept. Transportation Research Board, 1438, Landis, B. W., Vattikuti, V. R., Ottenberg, R. M., & McLeod, D. S. (2001). Modeling the roadside walking environment: Pedestrian level of service. Transportation Research Record, 1773, Lee, C., & Moudon, A. V. (2006). Correlates of walking for transportation or recreation purposes. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 3(1), Moudon, A. V., & Lee, C. (2003). Walking and bicycling: An evaluation of environmental audit instruments. American Journal of Health Promotion, 18(1), Page 14
15 Muraleetharan, T., & Hagiwara, T. (2007). Overall level of servce of urban walking environment and its influence on pedestrian route chice behavior: Analysis of pedestrian travel in Sapporo, Japan. Transportation Research Record, 2002, New York City Department of City Planning (NYC DCP). (2006). NYC Pedestrian Level of Service STudy - Phase I, Accessed February 2008 from the World Wide Web: Owen, N., Humpel, N., Leslie, E., Bauman, A., & Sallis, J. (2004). Understanding environmental influences on walking: Review and research agenda. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 27(1), Petritsch, T. A., Landis, B. W., McLeod, P. S., & Huang, H. F. (2006). Pedestrian level-ofservice model for urban arterial facilities with sidewalks. Transportation Research Record, 1982, Phillips, R., & Guttenplan, M. (2003). A review of approaches for assessing multimodal quality of service. Journal of Public Transportation, 6(4), 19. Pikora, T. (2003). Developing a framework for assessment of the environmental determinants of walking and cycling. Social Science & Medicine, 56(8), Pikora, T., Bull, F. C. L., Jamrozik, K., & Knuiman, M. (2002). Developing a reliable audit instrument to measure the physical environment for physical activity. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 23(3), Rapoport, A. (1987). Pedestrian Street use: Culture and perception. In Anne Moudon (ed) Public Streets for Public Use. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold. Saelens, B., Sallis, J., Black, J. B., & Chen, D. (2003). Neighborhood-based differences in physical activity: An environment scale evaluation. American Journal of Public Health, 93(9), Saelens, B., Sallis, J., & Frank, L. (2003). Environmental correlates of walking and cycling: Findings from the transportation, urban design, and planning literature. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 25(2), Transportation Research Board (TRB). (2000). Highway Capacity Manual. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board, National Research Council. Zacharias, J. (2001). Pedestrian behavior pedestrian behavior and perception in urban walking environments. Journal of Planning Literature, 16(1), Page 15
16 APPENDIX A BUILT ENVIRONMENT CHARACTERISTICS Page 16
17 Source: Craig et al. (2002). Page 17
18 Source: Owen et al. (2004). Page 18
19 APPENDIX B SAMPLE ENVIRONMENTAL AUDIT INSTRUMENT Page 19
20 Source: Clifton et al. (2007). Page 20
21 APPENDIX C FORT COLLINS, CO PEDESTRIAN LOS Page 21
22 Page 22
Young Researchers Seminar 2011
Young Researchers Seminar 2011 Young Researchers Seminar 2011 DTU, Denmark, 8 10 June, 2011 DTU, Denmark, June 8-10, 2011 Methods for assessing the pedestrian level of service: International experience
More informationVision: Traditional hamlet with an attractive business/pedestrian friendly main street connected to adjacent walkable neighborhoods
N D. Focus Area II Vision: Traditional hamlet with an attractive business/pedestrian friendly main street connected to adjacent walkable neighborhoods Transit Road Focus Area II is located in the Hamlet
More informationSummary Report: Built Environment, Health and Obesity
Research and education Built Environment Edmonton Project Summary Report: Built Environment, Health and Obesity Introduction In 2007 the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and the Heart and Stroke
More information5. Pedestrian System. Accomplishments Over the Past Five Years
5. Pedestrian System Accomplishments Over the Past Five Years The Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) and its partner agencies recognize the importance of improving pedestrian mobility.
More informationExhibit 1 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM
Exhibit 1 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM Project Name: Grand Junction Circulation Plan Grand Junction Complete Streets Policy Applicant: City of Grand Junction Representative: David Thornton Address:
More informationThis objective implies that all population groups should find walking appealing, and that it is made easier for them to walk more on a daily basis.
Walking for life The Norwegian Walking Strategy Guro Berge Norwegian public Roads Administration "Walking for life" is the slogan for the National Walking Strategy that is now being formulated in Norway.
More informationTable A.1. Built Environment Infrastructure Domain Summary
40 Vehicle Crosswalk AARP Livable Communities Guide and Quiz Instruments Measuring Fitness and Recreation Environments (AIMFREE) (Consumer Version) Active Community Environments (ACE) Checklist (Washington
More informationThe Walkability Indicator. The Walkability Indicator: A Case Study of the City of Boulder, CO. College of Architecture and Planning
1 : A Case Study of the City of Boulder, CO College of Architecture and Planning University of Colorado Author Note: Daryoosh Ardalan, Urban Regional Planning, College of Architecture and Planning, University
More informationA Traffic Operations Method for Assessing Automobile and Bicycle Shared Roadways
A Traffic Operations Method for Assessing Automobile and Bicycle Shared Roadways A Thesis Proposal By James A. Robertson Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment
More informationo n - m o t o r i z e d transportation is an overlooked element that can greatly enhance the overall quality of life for the community s residents.
N o n - m o t o r i z e d transportation is an overlooked element that can greatly enhance the overall quality of life for the community s residents. 84 Transportation CHAPTER 11 INTRODUCTION Transportation
More informationNon-motorized Transportation Planning Resource Book Mayor s Task Force on Walking and Bicycling City of Lansing, Michigan Spring 2007 pg.
Non-motorized Transportation Planning Resource Book pg. 105 of 158 Non-motorized Transportation Planning Resource Book pg. 106 of 158 Non-motorized Transportation Planning Resource Book pg. 107 of 158
More informationThank you for this opportunity to discuss with you how we can work together to make our streets more complete.
Thank you for this opportunity to discuss with you how we can work together to make our streets more complete. 1 2 3 Thank you for this opportunity to discuss with you how we can work together to make
More informationA GIS APPROACH TO EVALUATE BUS STOP ACCESSIBILITY
Advanced OR and AI Methods in Transportation A GIS APPROACH TO EVALUATE BUS STOP ACCESSIBILITY Giuseppe SALVO 1, Simona SABATINI 2 Abstract. This paper proposes a methodology to assess public transportation
More informationProposed. City of Grand Junction Complete Streets Policy. Exhibit 10
Proposed City of Grand Junction Complete Streets Policy Exhibit 10 1 City of Grand Junction Complete Streets Policy Vision: The Complete Streets Vision is to develop a safe, efficient, and reliable travel
More informationA CHANGING CITY. of Edmonton, it is essential that it reflects the long-term vision of the City.
A CHANGING CITY By the year 2040, Edmonton will be home to more than 1 million people. To accommodate growth and support a healthy and compact city, we need a new approach to development/redevelopment
More informationADOT Statewide Bicycle and Pedestrian Program Summary of Phase IV Activities APPENDIX B PEDESTRIAN DEMAND INDEX
ADOT Statewide Bicycle and Pedestrian Program Summary of Activities APPENDIX B PEDESTRIAN DEMAND INDEX May 24, 2009 Pedestrian Demand Index for State Highway Facilities Revised: May 29, 2007 Introduction
More informationCity of Elizabeth City Neighborhood Traffic Calming Policy and Guidelines
City of Elizabeth City Neighborhood Traffic Calming Policy and Guidelines I. Purpose: The City of Elizabeth City is committed to ensure the overall safety and livability of residential neighborhoods. One
More informationApplying Bi-objective Shortest Path Methods to Model Cycle Route-choice
Applying Bi-objective Shortest Path Methods to Model Cycle Route-choice Chris Van Houtte, Judith Y. T. Wang, and Matthias Ehrgott September 30, 2009 Outline Commuter Cyclists Motivation Choice Set Route
More informationAgenda. Overview PRINCE GEORGE S PLAZA METRO AREA PEDESTRIAN PLAN
PRINCE GEORGE S PLAZA METRO AREA PEDESTRIAN PLAN May 28, 2008 Agenda Welcome and introductions Project overview and issue identification Planning context and strengths Design challenges and initial recommendations
More information21.07 TRANSPORT CONNECTIVITY AND INFRASTRUCTURE
21.07 TRANSPORT CONNECTIVITY AND INFRASTRUCTURE 21.07-1 Connectivity and Choice Transport connectivity and mode choice are critical to achieving productive, sustainable and socially just cities. Travel
More information2. Context. Existing framework. The context. The challenge. Transport Strategy
Transport Strategy Providing quality connections Contents 1. Introduction 2. Context 3. Long-term direction 4. Three-year priorities 5. Strategy tree Wellington City Council July 2006 1. Introduction Wellington
More informationNM-POLICY 1: Improve service levels, participation, and options for non-motorized transportation modes throughout the County.
Transportation PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY 2008 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN NON-MOTORIZED PLAN CONTENTS Goals, Policies, and Action Strategies Table 4 (Bike Facility Classifications and Descriptions) Table 5 (Bike Facility
More informationCity of Novi Non-Motorized Master Plan 2011 Executive Summary
City of Novi Non-Motorized Master Plan 2011 Executive Summary Prepared by: February 28, 2011 Why Plan? Encouraging healthy, active lifestyles through pathway and sidewalk connectivity has been a focus
More informationCity of Ottawa s Complete Streets Approach to Transportation Projects
City of Ottawa s Complete Streets Approach to Transportation Projects Presentation to Stakeholders Date: May 5, 2015 Presentation Overview Purpose of the study Proposed definition of Complete Streets for
More informationFrequently asked questions about how the Transport Walkability Index was calculated are answered below.
Transport Walkability Index The Transport Walkability Index is a relative indicator of how well the built environment in different areas supports walking for transport. The index is frequently used in
More informationRichmond Connects Visioning Update
Richmond Connects Visioning Update To date there have been four elements of the visioning process: Vision20 Night at Byrd Theatre on May 3rd Advisory Committee Meeting on May 12 th Public Visioning Workshop
More informationCITY OF COCOA BEACH 2025 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. Section VIII Mobility Element Goals, Objectives, and Policies
CITY OF COCOA BEACH 2025 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Section VIII Mobility Element Goals, Objectives, and Policies Adopted August 6, 2015 by Ordinance No. 1591 VIII MOBILITY ELEMENT Table of Contents Page Number
More informationCONNECTIVITY PLAN. Adopted December 5, 2017 City of Virginia Beach
CONNECTIVITY PLAN Adopted December 5, 2017 City of Virginia Beach CONTENTS 1.0 Background & Purpose... 2 2.0 Existing Inventory & Analysis... 3 ViBe District Existing Walking Conditions... 4 3.0 ViBe District
More informationDesign Principle Active Transport
Active Transport Definition Active transport includes non-motorised forms of transport involving physical activity, such as walking and cycling. It also includes public transport to meet longer distance
More informationMultimodal Arterial Level of Service
Multimodal Arterial Level of Service DOUGLAS S. MCLEOD Florida Department of Transportation, USA ABSTRACT The concept of quality of service from a user perspective of a transportation facility or service
More informationAPPENDIX A: Complete Streets Checklist DRAFT NOVEMBER 2016
APPENDIX A: Complete Streets Checklist DRAFT NOVEMBER 2016 Complete Streets Checklist MetroPlan Orlando s Complete Streets Checklist is an internal planning tool for staff to further implementation of
More informationSection 9. Implementation
Section 9. Implementation The transportation system is just one of many aspects that must be carefully planned to maintain and enhance the quality of living in Cecil County. The Cecil County Bicycle Plan
More informationWELCOME TO OPEN HOUSE # 1 June 14, 2017
Langstaff Road Weston Road to Highway 7 Class Environmental Assessment Study WELCOME TO OPEN HOUSE # 1 June 14, 2017 Please sign in and join our mailing list Purpose of Open House #1 & Study Area York
More information10.0 CURB EXTENSIONS GUIDELINE
10.0 CURB EXTENSIONS GUIDELINE Road Engineering Design Guidelines Version 1.0 March 2017 City of Toronto, Transportation Services City of Toronto Page 0 Background In early 2014, Transportation Services
More informationTonight is for you. Learn everything you can. Share all your ideas.
Strathcona Neighbourhood Renewal Draft Concept Design Tonight is for you. Learn everything you can. Share all your ideas. What is Neighbourhood Renewal? Creating a design with you for your neighbourhood.
More informationIllustrated Principles of Good Planning
Illustrated Principles of Good Planning The Miami 21 Zoning Code incorporates time-tested planning principles into the zoning regulations of our City. These are principles that make for better neighborhoods,
More informationTORONTO WALKING STRATEGY
CITY OF TORONTO t TORONTO WALKING STRATEGY EVERYONE IS A PEDESTRIAN ItitiORONM TORONTO MAYOR DAVID MILLER Toronto's Walking Strategy is a vision for a more liveable, prosperous and sustainable city. It
More informationGIS Based Data Collection / Network Planning On a City Scale. Healthy Communities Active Transportation Workshop, Cleveland, Ohio May 10, 2011
The Purpose of GIS Based Network Planning GIS Based Data Collection / Network Planning Healthy Communities Active Transportation Conference Tuesday, May 10, 2011 10:00 AM Norman Cox, LLA, ASLA. Ann Arbor,
More informationResearch Article Method to Determine Pedestrian Level of Service for the Overall Unsignalized Midblock Crossings of Road Segments
Hindawi Publishing Corporation Advances in Mechanical Engineering Volume 2014, Article ID 652986, 9 pages http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/652986 Research Article Method to Determine Pedestrian Level of
More informationLiving Streets Policy
Living Streets Policy Introduction Living streets balance the needs of motorists, bicyclists, pedestrians and transit riders in ways that promote safety and convenience, enhance community identity, create
More informationMoving Towards Complete Streets MMLOS Applications
Moving Towards Complete Streets MMLOS Applications Transportation Education Series May 18 th, 2012 It s not just for cars! Presentation Overview The Complete Streets Movement What is Multi-Modal Level
More informationMemorandum. Drive alone
Memorandum To: Cc: From: Kimberly Kerr, Assistant Chief Administrative Officer Natalie Porter, PE, TE Shawna Purvines Claudia Wade, PE Michael Schmitt, AICP CTP, PTP Re: Technical Memorandum #2: Model
More informationAMATS Complete Streets Policy
AMATS Complete Streets Policy Table of Contents: Section 1. Definition of Complete Streets Section 2. Principles of Complete Streets Section 3. Complete Streets Policy Section 4. Consistency Section 5.
More informationGIS Based Non-Motorized Transportation Planning APA Ohio Statewide Planning Conference. GIS Assisted Non-Motorized Transportation Planning
The Purpose of GIS Assisted Network GIS Assisted Non-Motorized Transportation 2011 APA Ohio Statewide Conference Friday, 10:45 AM to Noon Focus on near-term projects wwwgreenwaycollabcom The purpose of
More informationAPPENDIX A: BENEFITS Introduction Quantitative Benefits of Street Furniture
Introduction Great Streets are a careful combination of architecture, land use, transportation, urban design, landscape, and culture- all in the right quantities and at the right scale. Great streets are
More informationChapter 7. Transportation. Transportation Road Network Plan Transit Cyclists Pedestrians Multi-Use and Equestrian Trails
Chapter 7 Transportation Transportation Road Network Plan Transit Cyclists Pedestrians Multi-Use and Equestrian Trails 7.1 TRANSPORTATION BACKGROUND The District of Maple Ridge faces a number of unique
More informationComplete Street Analysis of a Road Diet: Orange Grove Boulevard, Pasadena, CA
Complete Street Analysis of a Road Diet: Orange Grove Boulevard, Pasadena, CA Aaron Elias, Bill Cisco Abstract As part of evaluating the feasibility of a road diet on Orange Grove Boulevard in Pasadena,
More informationCorpus Christi Metropolitan Transportation Plan Fiscal Year Introduction:
Introduction: The Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU) has continued the efforts started through the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency
More informationFinding a bicycle route that offers a high Level of Service in Adelaide
Finding a bicycle route that offers a high Level of Service in Adelaide Sekhar School of Natural and Built Environment, University of South Australia 1 Introduction Many community planners and policy makers
More informationMethodology for Linking Greenways and Trails with Public Transportation in Florida
Methodology for Linking Greenways and Trails with Public Transportation in Florida Sara Hendricks, Senior Research Associate Center for Urban Transportation Research, University of South Florida CUTR Webcast,
More informationHARRISON STREET/OAKLAND AVENUE COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION PLAN
HARRISON STREET/OAKLAND AVENUE Community Workshop #4: Draft Plan Review December 3, 2009 D E S I G N, C O M M U N I T Y & E N V I R O N M E N T INTRODUCTIONS Key Project Staff: Alisa Shen, Project Manager,
More informationIDENTIFICATION OF FACTORS AFFECTING PEDESTRIAN LEVEL OF SERVICE OF CROSSWALKS AT ROUNDABOUTS
IDENTIFICATION OF FACTORS AFFECTING PEDESTRIAN LEVEL OF SERVICE OF CROSSWALKS AT ROUNDABOUTS Vaibhav Vijayawargiya 1, Siddhartha Rokade 2 1PG Student, Dept. of Civil Engineering, MANIT, Bhopal, MP, India
More informationA Walkability Study for Downtown Brunswick
Alex Thompson and Sam Vitello E.S. 204 Semester Project-Final Paper A Walkability Study for Downtown Brunswick Introduction and Problem Statement The goal of our project was to analyze parking availability
More informationCharacteristics from these programs were used to compare to and evaluate existing conditions in Howard County.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Bike share is a mobility option that allows users to access a fleet of public bicycles throughout a community. Bike share systems have successfully been implemented in communities throughout
More informationEastern PA Trail Summit October 1, 2018
Eastern PA Trail Summit October 1, 2018 WHO WE ARE + WHY + WE RE * HERE * * * * * * Session Goals: Discuss how to coordinate planning and design in small, urbanized towns Consider how to develop alternative
More informationMulti-modal performance measures: Are we getting an A? Madeline Brozen Herbie Huff UCLA Institute of Transportation Studies Webinar 9/16/14
Multi-modal performance measures: Are we getting an A? Madeline Brozen Herbie Huff UCLA Institute of Transportation Studies Webinar 9/16/14 Agenda Why measure the street for walking and bicycling? Measures
More informationThe Development of Walking Environment Measures for Indonesia Cities
The Development of Walking Environment Measures for Indonesia Cities Sony Sulaksono WIBOWO 1, a 1 Study Program of Civil Engineering, Bandung Institute of Technology 6 th CIBE Building Jalan Ganesha 10,
More informationA TOOLKIT TO MEASURE ATTRIBUTES THAT SUPPORT OR HINDER PEDESTRIAN MOVEMENT ON PEDESTRIAN CROSSINGS
A TOOLKIT TO MEASURE ATTRIBUTES THAT SUPPORT OR HINDER PEDESTRIAN MOVEMENT ON PEDESTRIAN CROSSINGS Mohammad Faruk 1, Marcus Ormerod, Rita Newton and Hamish MacLennan SURFACE Inclusive Design Research Centre,
More informationThe Application of Pedestrian Microscopic Simulation Technology in Researching the Influenced Realm around Urban Rail Transit Station
Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering 4 (2016) 242-246 doi: 10.17265/2328-2142/2016.05.002 D DAVID PUBLISHING The Application of Pedestrian Microscopic Simulation Technology in Researching
More informationActive Transportation Infrastructure Investment A Business Case
Active Transportation Infrastructure Investment A Business Case In 2016, the Real Estate Foundation awarded the Capital Regional District a $50,000 grant for Shifting Gears: Land Use Change through Active
More informationMETROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN OUTREACH: INTERACTIVE MAP SUMMARY REPORT- 10/03/14
METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN OUTREACH: INTERACTIVE MAP SUMMARY REPORT- 10/03/14 INTRODUCTION This document summarizes the results of the online interactive mapping exercise implemented by MIG for the
More informationCOUNCIL POLICY NAME: COUNCIL REFERENCE: 06/119 06/377 09/1C 10llC 12/1C INDEX REFERENCE: POLICY BACKGROUND
COUNCIL POLICY NAME: COUNCIL ADVISORY COMMITTEES - TERMS OF REFERENCE ISSUED: APRIL 3, 2006 AMENDED: NOVEMBER 27, 2006 NOVEMBER 23, 2009 JANUARY 11, 2010 DECEMBER 17, 2012 POLICY COUNCIL REFERENCE: 06/119
More informationUniversity of Victoria Campus Cycling Plan Terms of Reference. 1.0 Project Description
University of Victoria Campus Cycling Plan Terms of Reference 1.0 Project Description The Campus Cycling Plan, a first for the University, will provide a comprehensive and coordinated approach to support
More informationCHAPTER 7.0 IMPLEMENTATION
CHAPTER 7.0 IMPLEMENTATION Achieving the vision of the Better Streets Plan will rely on the ability to effectively fund, build and maintain improvements, and to sustain improvements over time. CHAPTER
More informationPerryville TOD and Greenway Plan
Perryville TOD and Greenway Plan Greenway Glossary Pathway: A bicycle and pedestrian path separated from motorized vehicular traffic by an open space, barrier or curb. Multi-use paths may be within the
More informationPedestrian Demand Modeling: Evaluating Pedestrian Risk Exposures
Pedestrian Demand Modeling: Evaluating Pedestrian Risk Exposures Kelly J. Clifton National Center for Smart Growth University of Maryland May 19, 2008 Study Team University of Maryland National Center
More informationIMPACT OF BICYCLE INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS IN NEW ORLEANS, LOUISIANA. Kathryn M. Parker MPH, Janet Rice PhD, Jeanette Gustat PhD
IMPACT OF BICYCLE INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS IN NEW ORLEANS, LOUISIANA Kathryn M. Parker MPH, Janet Rice PhD, Jeanette Gustat PhD Background A comparison of both self-reported and objectively measured
More informationComplete Streets Policy and Practice
Complete Streets Policy and Practice presented by Leslie Phemister, Nancy Wagner and Kasey Holloway Active Transportation Alliance 1 Learning Objectives Understand the connection between public health
More informationExecutive Summary Route 30 Corridor Master Plan
Route Corridor Master Plan Project Overview The Route Corridor Master Plan is a coordinated multimodal transportation and land use plan for the entire stretch of Route through East Whiteland Township,
More informationSECTION 1 - TRAFFIC PLANNING
SECTION 1 - TRAFFIC PLANNING 1.1 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS 1.1.1 Roadway Functional Classification The Multnomah County Comprehensive Framework Plan s Policy 34: Trafficways and the Functional Classification
More information2010 Pedestrian and Bicyclist Special Districts Study Update
2010 Pedestrian and Bicyclist Special Districts Study Update Pedestrian and Bicyclist Special Districts Program Overview H-GAC s Special Districts Program aims to provide strategic investments in pedestrian
More informationPedestrian Level of Service at Intersections in Bhopal City
Pedestrian Level of Service at Intersections in Bhopal City 1 Rakesh Wahane 1 M.E. Student 1 Department of Civil Engineering 1 Samrat Ashok Technological Institute Vidisha MP 464001 Abstract - This study
More informationTraffic Calming Policy
Page 22 of Report TS-1-13 Development and Infrastructure Division Transportation Services Department Approved by: City Council on February 19, 2013 Report Number: TS-1-13 Effective: February 20, 2013 Amended:
More informationThe Role of MPOs in Advancing Safe Routes to School through the Transportation Alternatives Program
The Role of MPOs in Advancing Safe Routes to School through the Transportation Alternatives Program In 2012, Congress made changes to Federal funding for Safe Routes to School that gave some metropolitan
More informationThe best indicator of an individual s and expanding access to parks and open space.
Health & Wellness Create a Safe and Healthy Built Environment Artist s rendering, 2014 Health is important to Loveland residents, and stakeholders see the many strong connections between quality of life,
More informationappendix b BLOS: Bicycle Level of Service B.1 Background B.2 Bicycle Level of Service Model Winston-Salem Urban Area
appendix b BLOS: B.1 Background Winston-Salem Urban Area Bicycle Level of Service Level of Service (LOS) is a framework that transportation professionals use to describe existing conditions (or suitability)
More informationEXECUTIVE SUMMARY: TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT IN SMITHS FALLS, ONTARIO; A COMPARISON BETWEEN TWO SITES
EECUTIVE SUMMARY: TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT IN SMITHS FALLS, ONTARIO; A COMPARISON BETWEEN TWO SITES Topic and Purpose In 2007, the Mayor of Ottawa s Task Force on Transportation suggested adding a
More informationsummary of issues and opportunities
1 summary of issues and opportunities EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CHAPTER 2: HISTORY - 3: LAND USE This first chapter is an overview of lessons learned from analysis of the existing conditions on El Camino as well
More informationNJDOT Complete Streets Checklist
Background The New Jersey Department of Transportation s Complete Streets Policy promotes a comprehensive, integrated, connected multi-modal network by providing connections to bicycling and walking trip
More informationFHWA Resources for Pedestrian and Bicycle Professionals
FHWA Resources for Pedestrian and Bicycle Professionals Charlie Zegeer, UNC Highway Safety Research Center/PBIC Libby Thomas, UNC Highway Safety Research Center Dan Nabors, Vanasse Hangen Brustlin (VHB)
More informationSpeed Limits Study and Proposal. Public Input Session: 8/14/13
Speed Limits Study and Proposal Public Input Session: 8/14/13 Why is Decatur a unique place for this project? First Community Transportation Plan in the nation with a Health Impact Assessment. Strong sense
More informationBicycle Master Plan Goals, Strategies, and Policies
Bicycle Master Plan Goals, Strategies, and Policies Mobilizing 5 This chapter outlines the overarching goals, action statements, and action items Long Beach will take in order to achieve its vision of
More information2015 Florida Main Street Annual Conference. Complete Streets Equal Stronger Main Streets
WHAT ARE COMPLETE STREETS? CASE STUDIES COMPLETING YOUR MAIN STREET 2015 Florida Main Street Annual Conference St. Petersburg, Florida August 19, 2015 WHAT ARE COMPLETE STREETS? CASE STUDIES COMPLETING
More informationAbout the Active Transportation Alliance
About the Active Transportation Alliance Chicagoland s voice for better biking, walking and transit Founded 1985 7,000 members, ~33 full time staff Serve Chicago metro region 1 More Cars, More Driving
More informationWhy Zone In on Speed Reduction?
Learn it. Do it. Live it! SPEED REDUCTION IN THE ZONE Why Zone In on Speed Reduction? Speeding is a serious issue that plays a major role in the risk of serious injury and pedestrian fatality in a crash.
More informationCity of Seattle Edward B. Murray, Mayor
City of Seattle Edward B. Murray, Mayor Department of Transportation Scott Kubly, Director Eastlake Community Council 117 E Louisa St. #1 Seattle, WA 98102-3278 January 28, 2016 RE: Roosevelt to Downtown
More informationCity of Cape Coral Traffic Calming. City Council May 16,
City of Cape Coral Traffic Calming City Council May 16, 2016 1 In This Presentation Why Traffic Calming? What is Traffic Calming? Examples Traffic Calming in the City of Cape Coral How to develop a Traffic
More informationRESOLUTION NO ?? A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF NEPTUNE BEACH ADOPTING A COMPLETE STREETS POLICY
RESOLUTION NO. 2018-?? A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF NEPTUNE BEACH ADOPTING A COMPLETE STREETS POLICY WHEREAS, safe, convenient, and accessible transportation for all users is a priority of the City of Neptune
More informationNeighborhood environments and physical activity in youth: from research to practice
Neighborhood environments and physical activity in youth: from research to practice Jordan Carlson, PhD Center for Children s Healthy Lifestyles and Nutrition Children s Mercy Kansas City Contributors
More informationATTACHMENT 4 - TDM Checklist. TDM Checklist Overview
ATTACHMENT 4 - TDM Checklist TDM Checklist Overview The proposed checklist rates developments on the degree to which they are TDM and transit supportive. Points are assigned based on the level of transit
More informationBicycle and Pedestrian Chapter TPP Update Overview. TAB September 20, 2017
Bicycle and Pedestrian Chapter TPP Update Overview TAB September 20, 2017 Bicycling & Walking in the Twin Cities Where are we now? The Bike-Pedestrian system Current trends New developments Where are we
More informationDetermining bicycle infrastructure preferences A case study of Dublin
*Manuscript Click here to view linked References 1 Determining bicycle infrastructure preferences A case study of Dublin Brian Caulfield 1, Elaine Brick 2, Orla Thérèse McCarthy 1 1 Department of Civil,
More informationMeasuring Transportation: Traffic, Mobility and Accessibility
Measuring Transportation: Traffic, Mobility and Accessibility THIS FEATURE COMPARES THREE APPROACHES TO MEASURING TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PERFORMANCE. TRAFFIC-BASED MEASUREMENTS EVALUATE MOTOR VEHICLE MOVEMENT;
More informationCoquitlam Cross-town Bike Route Improving Bicycle Facilities in a Mature Suburban Environment
Coquitlam Cross-town Bike Route Improving Bicycle Facilities in a Mature Suburban Environment Sarah Rocchi, Vice-President, Projects, Opus International Consultants (Main Presenter) Catherine Mohoruk,
More informationBUILDING THE CASE FOR TRAVEL OPTIONS IN WASHING TON COUNTY. Image: Steve Morgan. Image: Steve Morgan
BUILDING THE CASE FOR TRAVEL OPTIONS IN WASHING TON COUNTY Image: Steve Morgan Image: Steve Morgan Image: TriMet Image: TriMet WHAT ARE TRAVEL OPTIONS PROGRAMS? Travel options programs encourage residents,
More informationPresentation Summary Why Use GIS for Ped Planning? What Tools are Most Useful? How Can They be Applied? Pedestrian GIS Tools What are they good for?
1 2 Pedestrian GIS Tools What are they good for? Pro Walk / Pro Bike 2006 Presentation Summary Why Use GIS for Ped Planning? What Tools are Most Useful? How Can They be Applied? Matt Haynes Fehr & Peers
More informationCITY OF BLOOMINGTON COMPLETE STREETS POLICY
CITY OF BLOOMINGTON COMPLETE STREETS POLICY POLICY OBJECTIVE: The City of Bloomington will enhance safety, mobility, accessibility and convenience for transportation network users of all ages and abilities,
More informationWelcome. Background. Goals. Vision
Welcome The formal Public Information Centre (PIC) for the Transportation Master Plan How We GO will be held in early 2017. At that time we will present the recommended transportation system for Niagara
More informationTHESE DAYS IT S HARD TO MISS the story that Americans spend
WHICH COMES FIRST: THE NEIGHBORHOOD OR THE WALKING? BY SUSAN HANDY AND PATRICIA MOKHTARIAN THESE DAYS IT S HARD TO MISS the story that Americans spend more time stuck in traffic than ever, that they re
More informationOld neighborhoods showcasing new urbanism principles to promote walking for transport
Old neighborhoods showcasing new urbanism principles to promote walking for transport Paula Grant MPIA CPP, Senior Lecturer (Urban and Regional Planning), University of Southern Queensland Abstract The
More information