Please be advised that the following participants were in attendance at the special conference call at 2:00pm yesterday:
|
|
|
- Elfreda Harmon
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 McCune, Kimberly From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: McCune, Kimberly Tuesday, August 30, :17 AM Shrier, Frank; Steve Manlow; Frazier, Patrick A (DFW); Ruth Tracy; Miller, Peggy A (DFW); Michelle Day; Bryce Michaelis; talexander@cowlitz.org; Asher, Eli; Amelia Johnson; Melody Tereski Olson, Todd (Todd.Olson@pacificorp.com) Aquatic Fund Subgroup Meeting, 8/29/16 - Conference Call Please be advised that the following participants were in attendance at the special conference call at 2:00pm yesterday: Meeting called to order at 2:15pm Frank Shrier, PacifiCorp Kim McCune, PacifiCorp Steve Manlow, LCFRB After consideration of the string below the following was agreed to for the cover letter, Section B of the Individual Project Evaluation Sheet and Section of the internal Aquatic Fund Strategic Plan and Admin Procedures document (first bullet): Cover letter (page 2) - Higher priority will be given to projects that provide for benefits to priority fish species and stocks. There is an emphasis on Spring Chinook recovery in the upper basin, but not to the exclusion of recovery of other ESA-listed species. Section B Individual Project Evaluation Sheet (first bullet) Does the project benefit priority fish species and stocks with emphasis on Spring Chinook recovery in the upper basin, but not to the exclusion of recovery of other ESA-listed species? Section Aquatic Fund (internal) Strategic Plan and Admin Procedures Does the project benefit priority fish species and stocks with emphasis on Spring Chinook recovery in the upper basin, but not to the exclusion of recovery of other ESA-listed species? In addition, reference to the current balance of the Bull Trout fund on page 1 of the cover letter will be removed since funding for bull trout projects will not occur in 2017 but will likely resume in This and the August 15, 2016 Meeting Notes will become part of the Aquatic Fund Subgroup meeting notes public record on the Lewis River website. Thank you for your efforts and participation in the Aquatic Fund Subgroup. Kimberly McCune Sr. Business Administrator PacifiCorp Hydro Resources 825 NE Multnomah St., Suite
2 Portland, OR Ph: (503) Mobile: (503) From: Shrier, Frank Sent: Wednesday, August 24, :51 AM To: Steve Manlow; Frazier, Patrick A (DFW); McCune, Kimberly; Ruth Tracy; Miller, Peggy A (DFW); Michelle Day; Bryce All, I ve sent out a Doodle poll request so that we can resolve this question in rapid manner. Once I have a date and time, I will set up a conference line. From: Steve Manlow [mailto:smanlow@lcfrb.gen.wa.us] Sent: Tuesday, August 23, :10 PM To: Frazier, Patrick A (DFW); McCune, Kimberly; Shrier, Frank; Ruth Tracy; Miller, Peggy A (DFW); Michelle Day; Bryce Subject: RESPONSE REQUESTED: AQ Fund revised Announcement Materials All: I understand the general emphasis on those species we need to introduce above Swift, and agree with Pat that we need consider multiple species in the upper basin. The only hesitation I have with stating a discreet geographic preference for projects occurring upstream of swift dam is that for some species, the population performance bottleneck may occur below the dam. What if lower river rearing habitat is more of a bottleneck than upper basin rearing habitat? Would we be foreclosing opportunities by focusing work in the upper basin? I don t know that this is the case, but it is a question. I think we d all agree that the focus should be actions that support successful reintroduction of Springers, coho and steelhead in the upper basin, but that doesn t necessarily mean that is where the most beneficial work needs to take place if rearing habitat is a key limiting factor. Maybe it s not? I d appreciate your thoughts on this. Steve From: Frazier, Patrick A (DFW) [mailto:patrick.frazier@dfw.wa.gov] Sent: Tuesday, August 23, :17 PM To: Steve Manlow <smanlow@lcfrb.gen.wa.us>; McCune, Kimberly <Kimberly.McCune@pacificorp.com>; Shrier, Frank <Frank.Shrier@pacificorp.com>; Ruth Tracy <rtracy@fs.fed.us>; Miller, Peggy A (DFW) <Peggy.Miller@dfw.wa.gov>; Michelle Day <michelle.day@noaa.gov>; Bryce Michaelis <bmichaelis@fs.fed.us>; talexander@cowlitz.org; Asher, Eli <easher@cowlitz.org>; Amelia Johnson <ajohnson@lcfrb.gen.wa.us>; Melody Tereski <mtereski@lcfrb.gen.wa.us> Kim and Frank, I am generally supportive of the direction Steve Manlow is going with his edits, but have some concern that we are connecting spring chinook and projects occurring above Swift Reservoir in the same phrase. During the subcommittee meeting these were two separate thoughts and I think should remain that way. The phrase Steve has added limits the above Swift consideration to only spring chinook. The Swift consideration should include coho and steelhead also. To keep moving the direction Steve has proposed I have a couple of alternatives for the 1 st two bullets in Section 3.2, as follows: 2
3 1. Leave the 1 st bullet as is and change the 2 nd bullet to have similar wording as the 1 st bullet. The 2 nd bullet would be worded Emphasis will be placed on projects occurring upstream of Swift Dam but not to the exclusion of projects occurring below Swift Dam. 2. Delete the 2 nd bullet and reword 1 st bullet to include consideration for projects above Swift Reservoir. The 1 st bullet would be worded Emphasis will be placed on Spring Chinook recovery and projects occurring upstream of Swift Dam but not to the exclusion of other ESA listed species or projects occurring downstream of Swift Dam Personally I prefer Option number 1. I think it is clearer and is more consistent with the intent of the subcommittee. It also fits with the 2 nd bullet under section that reads Is the proposed project upstream of Swift dam? If you have an questions or concerns regarding my suggestions feel free to contact me. If we need to discuss this further my schedule is pretty open this week. Pat F. From: Steve Manlow [mailto:smanlow@lcfrb.gen.wa.us] Sent: Tuesday, August 16, :43 AM To: McCune, Kimberly; Shrier, Frank; Ruth Tracy; Miller, Peggy A (DFW); Frazier, Patrick A (DFW); Michelle Day; Bryce Frank and Kimberly: We d like offer a few comments and suggestions on the proposed wording. The second added bullet in Section 3.2 (Project Evaluation Guidance at a Program Level) and number 2 in Section 3.3 (Evaluation of Resource Projects) of the administrative procedures document states that proposed projects upstream of Swift dam will receive a higher priority than projects downstream of Merwin dam. The second bullet in Section also asks the question Is the proposed project upstream of Swift dam?. We are concerned that the discrete preference statement for projects in the upper basin may be overly broad in light of all of the variables involved, including project design, potential habitat lift, benefits to fish, cost and certainty of success. A poorly designed project with low certainty of success and biological lift in the upper basin should not be given automatic preference over a welldesigned and technically sound project that benefits multiple species (which may include spring Chinook rearing) in the lower basin. It could also lead to a poor expenditure of limited funds. As an alternative, perhaps drop the second bullet point in each of these sections and rework the first one to state Benefits to priority fish species and stocks with emphasis on Spring Chinook recovery in the upper basin, but not to the exclusion of other ESA listed species. Adding the phrase recovery in the upper basin would serve to focus the efforts in the upper basin and provide a recovery context, but in a manner that does preclude consideration of other important factors in prioritizing work. The automatic preference seems too prescriptive. Similar changes could be made in the other documents. Please let me know what you think. Thanks. Steve From: McCune, Kimberly [mailto:kimberly.mccune@pacificorp.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 16, :43 AM 3
4 To: Shrier, Frank Ruth Tracy Peggy Miller Frazier, Patrick A (DFW) <Patrick.Frazier@dfw.wa.gov>; Michelle Day <michelle.day@noaa.gov>; Steve Manlow <smanlow@lcfrb.gen.wa.us>; Bryce Michaelis <bmichaelis@fs.fed.us>; talexander@cowlitz.org; Asher, Eli <easher@cowlitz.org> Importance: High In accordance with our meeting yesterday please find attached the AQ Fund announcement materials and internal Evaluation Criteria document with the requested edits. Please submit all edits (in track changes) and/or comments to my attention no later than Tuesday, August 23, All documents will be finalized shortly thereafter. Kim From: McCune, Kimberly Sent: Tuesday, July 12, :07 AM To: 'Shrier, Frank'; Ruth Tracy; Peggy Miller; Frazier, Patrick A (DFW); 'Michelle Day'; Steve Manlow; Bryce Michaelis; 'talexander@cowlitz.org'; Asher, Eli Subject: RE: RESPONSE REQUESTED: AQ Fund Subgroup Announcement Materials Importance: High In accordance with our meeting yesterday please find attached a revised cover letter addressing Subgroup comments around Chinook recovery emphasis, while also addressing the intent of the Settlement Agreement. Also attached is the Aquatic Fund Strategic Plan and Administrative Procedures (process document) and Evaluation Criteria for your review and edits. Please note that all text in italics within the process document is Settlement Agreement language and cannot be changed. Please submit all edits (in track changes) and/or comments to my attention no later than Monday, August 1, Kim From: McCune, Kimberly Sent: Wednesday, June 22, :08 PM To: Shrier, Frank (Frank.Shrier@pacificorp.com); Ruth Tracy; Peggy Miller; Frazier, Patrick A (DFW); Roberts, Aaron; 'Michelle Day'; Steve Manlow; Bryce Michaelis; 'Nathan Reynolds (nreynolds@cowlitz.org)'; talexander@cowlitz.org; Asher, Eli Cc: Olson, Todd (Todd.Olson@pacificorp.com) Subject: RESPONSE REQUESTED: AQ Fund Subgroup Announcement Materials 4
5 Please find attached the following administrative materials we discussed briefly today for your review and any additional edits: Attachment A: Pre-Proposal Form Attachment C: Landowner Acknowledgement Form (no changes have been submitted yet for this document) Attachment D: Individual Project Evaluation Sheet (please review and submit requested edits) Aquatic Fund Full Proposal review content and edit as needed (italics cannot be changed) Aquatic Fund Strategic Plan and Administrative Procedures (process document) Note - Attachment B: Lewis River Aquatic Fund Priority Reaches (not included with this ) Please submit all edits and/or comments to my attention on or before Wednesday, July 6 th. Frank will continue to work on the requested revisions to the Priority Reaches document prior to our next meeting July 11, Kimberly McCune Sr. Business Administrator PacifiCorp Hydro Resources 825 NE Multnomah St., Suite 1500 Portland, OR Ph: (503) Mobile: (503)
Lewis River Hydroelectric Projects Settlement Agreement Aquatic Coordination Committee (ACC) Meeting Agenda
Lewis River Hydroelectric Projects Settlement Agreement Aquatic Coordination Committee (ACC) Meeting Agenda Date & Time: Thursday, September 4, 27 9: a.m. : a.m. Place: CONFERENCE CALL ONLY Contacts: Frank
Lewis River Hydroelectric Projects Settlement Agreement Aquatic Coordination Committee (ACC) Meeting Agenda
Lewis River Hydroelectric Projects Settlement Agreement Aquatic Coordination Committee (ACC) Meeting Agenda Date & Time: Thursday, August, 27 9: a.m. :45 a.m. Place: CONFERENCE CALL ONLY Contacts: Frank
Lewis River Hydroelectric Projects Settlement Agreement Aquatic Coordination Committee (ACC) Meeting Agenda
Lewis River Hydroelectric Projects Settlement Agreement Aquatic Coordination Committee (ACC) Meeting Agenda Date & Time: Thursday, December 14, 2017 9:00 a.m. 11:15 a.m. Place: Merwin Hydro Control Center
PLEASE BRING YOUR LUNCH
Lewis River Hydroelectric Projects Settlement Agreement Aquatic Coordination Committee (ACC) Meeting Agenda Date & Time: Thursday, July 13, 217 9: a.m. 3: p.m. Place: Merwin Hydro Control Center 15 Merwin
Meeting Notes Lewis River License Implementation Aquatic Coordination Committee (ACC) Meeting March 8, 2012 Meeting at Merwin
ACC Participants Present (13) Meeting Notes Lewis River License Implementation Aquatic Coordination Committee (ACC) Meeting March 8, 2012 Meeting at Merwin Eli Asher, Lower Columbia River Fish Recovery
Lewis River Hydroelectric Projects Settlement Agreement Aquatic Coordination Committee (ACC) Meeting Agenda
Lewis River Hydroelectric Projects Settlement Agreement Aquatic Coordination Committee (ACC) Meeting Agenda Date & Time: Thursday, February 14, 219 9: a.m. 1:3 a.m. Place: CONFERENCE CALL ONLY Contacts:
PLEASE BRING YOUR LUNCH
Lewis River Hydroelectric Projects Settlement Agreement Aquatic Coordination Committee (ACC) Meeting Agenda Date & Time: Thursday, December 13, 218 9: a.m. 12:45 p.m. Place: Merwin Hydro Control Center
Lewis River Hydroelectric Projects Settlement Agreement Aquatic Coordination Committee (ACC) Meeting Agenda
Lewis River Hydroelectric Projects Settlement Agreement Aquatic Coordination Committee (ACC) Meeting Agenda Date & Time: Thursday, July 10, 2014 9:00 a.m. 10:30 a.m. Place: Conference Call Contacts: Frank
FINAL Meeting Notes Lewis River License Implementation Aquatic Coordination Committee (ACC) Meeting September 14, 2006 Ariel, WA
ACC Participants Present (19) FINAL Meeting Notes Lewis River License Implementation Aquatic Coordination Committee (ACC) Meeting September 14, 2006 Ariel, WA Craig Burley, WDFW Clifford Casseseka, Yakama
FINAL Meeting Notes Lewis River License Implementation Aquatic Coordination Committee (ACC) Meeting November 8, 2007 Ariel, WA
ACC Participants Present (19) FINAL Meeting Notes Lewis River License Implementation Aquatic Coordination Committee (ACC) Meeting November 8, 2007 Ariel, WA Jim Byrne, WDFW Clifford Casseseka, Yakama Nation
August 7, SUBJECT: Briefing on Surface Collectors in the Pacific Northwest: Operating Characteristics and Collection Success
James Yost Chair Idaho W. Bill Booth Idaho Guy Norman Washington Tom Karier Washington Jennifer Anders Vice Chair Montana Tim Baker Montana Ted Ferrioli Oregon Richard Devlin Oregon August 7, 2018 MEMORANDUM
Lake Merwin and Swift Creek Reservoir Tributaries. Bull Trout Limiting Factors Analysis
Lake Merwin and Swift Creek Reservoir Tributaries Bull Trout Limiting Factors Analysis Study Objectives Answer Key? s Do other tributaries to Swift Creek Reservoir and Lake Merwin not known to support
September 4, Update on Columbia basin Salmon and Steelhead Recovery Planning
Bill Bradbury Chair Oregon Henry Lorenzen Oregon W. Bill Booth Idaho James A. Yost Idaho Jennifer Anders Vice Chair Montana Pat Smith Montana Tom Karier Washington Phil Rockefeller Washington September
Attachment 6. Public Correspondence. Public correspondence received as of July 2, 2008
Attachment 6 Public Correspondence Public correspondence received as of July 2, 2008 May 8, 2008 Roger Smith Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife 3406 Cherry Avenue N.E. Salem, OR 97303 Mr. Smith and
APPENDIX D: LEWIS RIVER HATCHERY REVIEW
APPENDIX D: LEWIS RIVER HATCHERY REVIEW JANUARY 14, 2004 Prepared for PacifiCorp and Cowlitz PUD Prepared by S.P. Cramer & Associates, Inc. 600 NW Fariss Gresham, Oregon 97030 www.spcramer.com D-1 TABLE
PLEASE BRING YOUR LUNCH
Lewis River Hydroelectric Projects Settlement Agreement Aquatic Coordination Committee (ACC) Meeting Agenda Date & Time: Thursday, August 11, 216 9: a.m. 3:3 p.m. Place: Merwin Hydro Control Center 15
PRE- PROPOSAL FORM - Lewis River Aquatic Fund
PRE- PROPOSAL FORM - Lewis River Aquatic Fund 1. Applicant organization. USDA Forest Service Gifford Pinchot National Forest 2. Organization purpose Resource management agency 3. Project manager (name,
PRE- PROPOSAL FORM - 1. Applicant organization. USDA Forest Service Gifford Pinchot National Forest & WDFW Region 5
PRE- PROPOSAL FORM - 1. Applicant organization. USDA Forest Service Gifford Pinchot National Forest & WDFW Region 5 2. Organization purpose USFS-Resource management agency WDFW-Fish and Wildlife management
Interim Guidance Fish Presence Absence
Interim Guidance Fish Presence Absence Source: Forest Practices Act Guidance for Division 635 of the forest practices act dealing with stream classification when no fish surveys have been done (referenced
Lewis River Hydroelectric Projects Settlement Agreement Lewis River Recreation Coordination Committee (LRC) Meeting Agenda
Lewis River Hydroelectric Projects Settlement Agreement Lewis River Recreation Coordination Committee (LRC) Meeting Agenda Date & Time: Wednesday, February 24, 2016 9:30 AM 11:30 AM Place: Merwin Hydro
Burns Paiute Tribe Fisheries Department. Evaluate The Life History Of Native Salmonids Within The Malheur Subbasin Project #
Burns Paiute Tribe Fisheries Department Evaluate The Life History Of Native Salmonids Within The Malheur Subbasin Project # 199701900 Prior to 1990 Technical and/or scientific background Malheur population,
107 FERC 61,282 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
107 FERC 61,282 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION Before Commissioners: Pat Wood, III, Chairman; Nora Mead Brownell, and Joseph T. Kelliher. Public Utility District No. 1 of
LEWIS RIVER FISH PLANNING DOCUMENT
LEWIS RIVER FISH PLANNING DOCUMENT Prepared for PacifiCorp and Cowlitz PUD April 2004 S. P. Cramer & Associates, Inc. 600 NW Fariss Gresham, OR 97030 (503) 491-9577 www.spcramer.com EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The
FINAL Meeting Notes Lewis River License Implementation Aquatic Coordination Committee (ACC) Meeting February 8, 2007 Ariel, WA
FINAL Meeting Notes Lewis River License Implementation Aquatic Coordination Committee (ACC) Meeting February 8, 2007 Ariel, WA ACC Participants Present (23) Jim Byrne, WDFW Clifford Casseseka, Yakama Nation
Hatchery Reform and our Pacific Region National Fish Hatcheries. Presented by Doug Olson
Hatchery Reform and our Pacific Region National Fish Hatcheries Presented by Doug Olson What is Hatchery Reform? Hatchery reform is actually quite simple in principle: its managing hatcheries as a type
Lewis River Upstream Transport Plan Interim Final. Prepared by Frank Shrier Principal Fish Biologist PacifiCorp Energy.
Lewis River Interim Final Upstream Transport Plan Lewis River Upstream Transport Plan Interim Final Prepared by Frank Shrier Principal Fish Biologist PacifiCorp Energy December 18, 2009 Page 1 of 31 Table
Summary of HSRG Findings for Chum Populations in the Lower Columbia River and Gorge
Summary of HSRG Findings for Chum Populations in the Lower Columbia River and Gorge The Congressionally-established Hatchery and Scientific Review Group (HSRG) developed a foundation of salmon hatchery
January 4, Addresses water quality within the Council program.
Phil Rockefeller Chair Washington Tom Karier Washington Henry Lorenzen Oregon Bill Bradbury Oregon W. Bill Booth Vice Chair Idaho James Yost Idaho Pat Smith Montana Jennifer Anders Montana January 4, 2016
OREGON AND WASHINGTON DEPARTMENTS OF FISH AND WILDLIFE JOINT STAFF REPORT - WINTER FACT SHEET NO.
OREGON AND WASHINGTON DEPARTMENTS OF FISH AND WILDLIFE JOINT STAFF REPORT - WINTER FACT SHEET NO. 3a Columbia River Compact/Joint State Hearing February 21, 2018 Fisheries under consideration: Mainstem
The following language describing the performance standards was taken from the Reasonable and Prudent Alternative Table of Actions in the 2008 BIOP:
FISH PASSAGE CENTER 1827 NE 44 th Ave., Suite 240, Portland, OR 97213 Phone: (503) 230-4099 Fax: (503) 230-7559 http://www.fpc.org/ e-mail us at fpcstaff@fpc.org MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: Michele DeHart Margaret
Steve Hemstrom Sr. Fisheries Biologist Chelan PUD Natural Resources Desk: Cell:
From: To: Cc: Subject: Date: Attachments: Hemstrom, Steven "Lewis, Stephen" Sokolowski, Rosana 2014 Rocky Reach Bull Trout Report Wednesday, June 18, 2014 3:01:07 PM Final 2014 Rocky Reach Bull Trout Observations
Agenda Item E.2.g Supplemental Public Comment 2 April 2012
Agenda Item E.2.g Supplemental Public Comment 2 April 2012 O Laughlin & Paris LLP Attorneys at Law SENT VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL March 26, 2012 Pacific Fishery Management Council 7700 NE Ambassador
Attachment 1. Agenda Item Summary BACKGROUND
Attachment 1 Agenda Item Summary BACKGROUND Spring Chinook Salmon: Prior to the late 1970s, non-treaty spring Chinook fisheries in the mainstem Columbia River occurred from February through May and harvested
Management Strategies for Columbia River Recreational and Commercial Fisheries: 2013 and Beyond
Management Strategies for Columbia River Recreational and Commercial Fisheries: 2013 and Beyond Recommendation of the Columbia River Fishery Management Workgroup to the Fish and Wildlife Commissions of
Oregon Administrative Rules Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife
DIVISION 500 Fish Management Plans 635-500-0002 Purpose The administrative rules contained in this division are the legally enforceable elements of fish management plans. Fish management plans are comprehensive
Subject: Wells Hydroelectric Project FERC Project No Bull Trout Management Plan and Incidental Take Annual Report
Ms. Jessica Gonzales April 15, 2015 Wenatchee Office Lead Central Washington Field Office U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service 215 Melody Lane, Suite 119 Wenatchee, WA 98801-5933 Subject: Wells Hydroelectric
Final Bull Trout Genetics Monitoring Plan for the Wallowa Falls Hydroelectric Project. (FERC No. P-308) June 2017
Final for the Wallowa Falls Hydroelectric Project (FERC No. P-308) June 2017 Prepared by: Jeremiah Doyle PacifiCorp 825 NE Multnomah Street Portland, OR 97232 June, 2017 Page 1 of 8 Table of Contents 1.0
Segregation Weir Placement, Monitoring and Objective
Study 36 Segregation Weir Placement, Monitoring and Objective Final 2014 Monitoring and Analysis Plan November 2013 San Joaquin River Restoration Program Fall - Run Monitoring Activities Segregation Weir
Follow this and additional works at:
University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst International Conference on Engineering and Ecohydrology for Fish Passage International Conference on Engineering and Ecohydrology for Fish
Update on Columbia Basin Partnership Task Force
Update on Columbia Basin Partnership Task Force June 25, 2018 Marla Harrison Port of Portland M A F A C C B P T A S K F O R C E Overview of Today s Presentation: Background on Columbia Basin & why we need
ESCA. Endangered Species Conservation Act of 1969 Changed in 1973 to ESA Amended several times
ESCA Endangered Species Conservation Act of 1969 Changed in 1973 to ESA Amended several times International Efforts http://www.cites.org/ Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild
Throughout the Pacific Northwest, salmon and steelhead have been listed under the Endangered Species Act because their existence is either threatened
Throughout the Pacific Northwest, salmon and steelhead have been listed under the Endangered Species Act because their existence is either threatened or endangered. The Upper Willamette River Basin s spring
Within Phase I, researchers have identified four tasks that they think are essential for designing the most informative study.
Revised Study Plan June 30, 2005 I. Introduction The Merwin upstream fish passage facility was originally completed with construction of the Merwin Dam. This trapping facility historically operated with
Strategies for mitigating ecological effects of hatchery programs
Strategies for mitigating ecological effects of hatchery programs Some case studies from the Pacific Northwest Kathryn Kostow Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Ecological risks occur when the presence
Downstream Fish Passage Reports from the Field
Downstream Fish Passage Reports from the Field Northwest Hydroelectric Association Fall Workshop Two World Trade Center, Portland, OR October 17, 2013 TODAY S PANEL MEMBERS Steve Fischer, PE, Tacoma Power
CAPTURE AND TRANSPORT OF LOWER COLUMBIA RIVER FALL CHINOOK SALMON DURING THE YEAR OF CONDIT DAM REMOVAL.
CAPTURE AND TRANSPORT OF LOWER COLUMBIA RIVER FALL CHINOOK SALMON DURING THE YEAR OF CONDIT DAM REMOVAL. Rod Engle USFWS, Credit Jeanette Burkhardt Credit Jeanette Burkhardt Issues related to fish populations
Five Counties Salmonid Conservation Program - Fish Passage Design Workshop. February 2013
Program - Aquatic Organisms and Stream Crossings Ecological Connectivity A watershed is a network of channels that drain a common boundary. Channel characteristics formed by interaction of precipitation,
June 3, 2014 MEMORANDUM. Council Members. Stacy Horton, Policy Analyst, Washington. SUBJECT: Final 2012 Hatchery Fin Clip Report
Bill Bradbury Chair Oregon Henry Lorenzen Oregon W. Bill Booth Idaho James A. Yost Idaho Jennifer Anders Vice Chair Montana Pat Smith Montana Tom Karier Washington Phil Rockefeller Washington June 3, 2014
Ecosystem Management Model
Ecosystem Management Model What happens with water rights issues? Klamath Tribes Nez Perce Tribe Native American tribes, Yurok, Hupa, and Karuk tribes Confederation of the Klamath, Modoc, and Yahooskin
Backgrounder and Frequently Asked Questions
Backgrounder and Frequently Asked Questions Who Sent the Letter? The 60-day Notice of Intent to File Suit was sent by Conservation Angler, Wild Fish Conservancy, Snake River Waterkeeper, Friends of the
Okanagan Sockeye Reintroduction
Okanagan Sockeye Reintroduction Backgrounder Elders accounts, and other forms of Traditional Ecological Knowledge (TEK) tell us that many species of salmon once came into the Okanagan Valley and tell us
Past, Present and Future Activities Being Conducted in the Klamath River Basin Related to the Protection and Recovery of Fish and Their Habitat
Past, Present and Future Activities Being Conducted in the Klamath River Basin Related to the Protection and Recovery of Fish and Their Habitat National Marine Fisheries Service March 2003 The Department
Perspectives of a State Director Selective fisheries as a tool in fisheries management and salmon recovery
Perspectives of a State Director Selective fisheries as a tool in fisheries management and salmon recovery Jeffrey P. Koenings, PhD. Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife American Fisheries Society
FISH PASSAGE IMPROVEMENT in California s Watersheds. Assessments & Recommendations by the Fish Passage Forum
FISH PASSAGE IMPROVEMENT in California s Watersheds Assessments & Recommendations by the Fish Passage Forum FISH PASSAGE IMPROVEMENT in California s Watersheds The mission of the Fish Passage Forum is
MEMORANDUM Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife
Attachment 3 MEMORANDUM Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Date: July 23, 2009 To: From: Oregon Fish and Wildlife Commission Bruce McIntosh, Assistant Fish Division Administrator Inland Fisheries Subject:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON MEDFORD DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
JANETTE K. BRIMMER (WSB #41271 jbrimmer@earthjustice.org TODD D. TRUE (WSB #12864 ttrue@earthjustice.org [Pro Hac Vice Pending] 705 Second Avenue, Suite 203 Phone (206 343-1526 Fax Attorneys for Plaintiff
STATE OF NEVADA BOARD OF WILDLIFE COMMISSIONERS
STATE OF NEVADA BOARD OF WILDLIFE COMMISSIONERS Number: P-33 Title: Fisheries Management Program Commission Policy Number 33 References: NRS 501.105, 501.181 Effective Date: July 24, 1999 Reviewed Date:
Upper Columbia Salmon Restoration: Breakout session: Columbia River Treaty Review Conference Castlegar, BC March 22 nd, 2013
Upper Columbia Salmon Restoration: Breakout session: Columbia River Treaty Review Conference Castlegar, BC March 22 nd, 2013 Bill Green Canadian Columbia River Intertribal Fisheries Commission Session
CUSHMAN RESERVOIRS. Skokomish Watershed Monitoring Conference - Public Meeting Florian Leischner 9/17/2015
CUSHMAN RESERVOIRS Skokomish Watershed Monitoring Conference - Public Meeting Florian Leischner 9/17/2015 CUSHMAN RESERVOIRS MONITORING Management and monitoring of Tacoma Power reservoirs Lake Cushman
David K. Hering and Mark W. Buktenica, Crater Lake National Park
Eradication of Nonnative Trout and the Response of Threatened Bull Trout at Crater Lake National Park: Extending Conservation Across Park Boundaries to a Watershed Scale David K. Hering and Mark W. Buktenica,
Cowlitz River Fisheries and Hatchery Management Plan (FHMP)
Cowlitz River Fisheries and Hatchery Management Plan (FHMP) Final August 2004 Prepared by Tacoma Power Table of Contents Executive Summary... ix 1.0 Introduction...1 2.0 Settlement Principles and License
4.4 ASSESSMENT OF POTENTIAL ANADROMOUS FISH HABITAT UPSTREAM OF MERWIN DAM (AQU 4)
4.4 ASSESSMENT OF POTENTIAL ANADROMOUS FISH HABITAT UPSTREAM OF MERWIN DAM (AQU 4) 4.4.1 Study Objectives The objectives of this study are to: (1) delineate the stream segments in the upper North Fork
Winter Steelhead Redd to Fish conversions, Spawning Ground Survey Data
Winter Steelhead Redd to Fish conversions, Spawning Ground Survey Data Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW); Corvallis Research Office Oregon Adult Salmonid Inventory and Sampling Project (June
TESTIMONY OF THE COLUMBIA RIVER TREATY TRIBES BEFORE PACIFIC FISHERIES MANAGEMENT COUNCIL April 12, 2010 Portland, OR
Agenda Item H.1.f Supplemental Tribal Report 2 April 2010 TESTIMONY OF THE COLUMBIA RIVER TREATY TRIBES BEFORE PACIFIC FISHERIES MANAGEMENT COUNCIL April 12, 2010 Portland, OR Good day Mr. Chairman and
LEAVENWORTH COMPLEX HATCHERY PROGRAMS. Presentation to the Independent Science Advisory Board
LEAVENWORTH COMPLEX HATCHERY PROGRAMS Presentation to the Independent Science Advisory Board FACILIT Y LOCATION AND PURPOSE Leavenworth NFH Spring Chinook (unlisted) and YN Coho production Entiat NFH Summer
Funding Habitat Restoration Projects for Salmon Recovery in the Snake River Region SRFB Grant Round Version: 2/19/16
2016 SRFB Grant Round Version: 2/19/16 Funding Habitat Restoration Projects for Salmon Recovery in the Snake River Region The Project Funding Process Presented by the Snake River Salmon Recovery Lead Entity
MEMORANDUM. Ron Boyce, ODFW Bob Heinith, CRITFC. Michele DeHart. DATE: November 30, Operations
FISH PASSAGE CENTER 1827 NE 44 th Ave., Suite 240, Portland, OR 97213 Phone: (503) 230-4099 Fax: (503) 230-7559 http://www.fpc.org/ e-mail us at fpcstaff@fpc.org MEMORANDUM TO: Ron Boyce, ODFW Bob Heinith,
Project Award Presentation
University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst International Conference on Engineering and Ecohydrology for Fish Passage International Conference on Engineering and Ecohydrology for Fish
Cowlitz Hydroelectric Project FERC No Cowlitz Fisheries Technical Committee Final FHMP Meeting Summary September 7, 2017 from 9:30 AM 2:00PM
Attendees: Tom Wadsworth Travis Nelson Michelle Day Carol Serdar Paul Sparks Jim Pacheco Dan Rawding John Serl Sam Gibbons Peggy Miller Thomas Buehrens (by phone) Ian Coulter (by phone) Eric Shoblom Florian
Downstream Migrant Trapping in Russian River Mainstem, Tributaries, and Estuary
Downstream Migrant Trapping in Russian River Mainstem, Tributaries, and Estuary Introduction In September 2008, the National Marine Fisheries Service issued the Russian River Biological Opinion, which
Informational Report 1 USFWS Mass Marking Update April 2005 Update on USFWS 2005 Mass Marking Initiative Background Under Section 138 of FY 2003 Omnibus Appropriations Act (PL 108-7), Congress directed
3. The qualification raised by the ISRP is addressed in #2 above and in the work area submittal and review by the ISRP as addressed in #1.
Please find attached a response from The Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs Reservation of Oregon (CTWSRO) for Project # 2008-301-00, Habitat Restoration Planning, Design and Implementation within
Kirt Hughes Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Region 6 - Fish Program Manager
Kirt Hughes Region 6 - Fish Program Manager Habitat Hatcheries Harvest Clean Water Act Shorelines Harvest Hydro Habitat Forest Practices Non-regulatory Programs Water Supply & Conservation Growth Management
The. Plain Facts. What s happening on the Deschutes River
The Plain Facts What s happening on the Deschutes River The Deschutes River system is an Oregon icon, treasured for its scenic beauty, the life-giving water it brings to the high desert, and its world-class
Fish Passage from the Tidewater to the Sierras Workshop - Fish Passage at High Dams - Part 1
+ Fish Passage from the Tidewater to the Sierras Workshop - Fish Passage at High Dams - Part 1 35 th Annual Salmonid Restoration Conference held in Davis, CA from March 29 April 1, 2017. Fish Passage from
By K.L. Pratt. Prepared for PacifiCorp, in cooperation with Cowlitz PUD, USFWS, WDFW July 2003
Evaluation of Three Proposed Management Scenarios to Enhance Three Potential Bull Trout Nursery Habitats, Accessible to Lake Merwin and Yale Lake, Lewis River By K.L. Pratt Prepared for PacifiCorp, in
Newaukum Watershed Culvert Assessment
Newaukum Watershed Culvert Assessment Water Resource Inventory Area 23 Lewis County Conservation District Final Report By: Kelly Verd and Nikki Wilson July 2002 Funded by: Chehalis Fisheries Restoration
August 2, 2016 MEMORANDUM. Council Members. SUBJECT: Bull trout ESA litigation update
Henry Lorenzen Chair Oregon Bill Bradbury Oregon Phil Rockefeller Washington Tom Karier Washington W. Bill Booth Vice Chair Idaho James Yost Idaho Pat Smith Montana Jennifer Anders Montana August 2, 2016
Lewis River Fish Passage Program 2014 Annual Report (30-day review Draft)
Lewis River Fish Passage Program 2014 Annual Report (30-day review Draft) FERC Project Nos. 935, 2071, 2111, 2213 Merwin Fish Collection Facility Adult Holding Tank 2014 Photo by Chris Karchesky PacifiCorp
State of Washington Dept. of Fish and Wildlife invites applications for the position of: Permanent Fisheries Biologist 4 *
State of Washington Dept. of Fish and Wildlife invites applications for the position of: Permanent Fisheries Biologist 4 *00593-15 SALARY: $3,819.00 - $5,010.00 Monthly OPENING DATE: 01/21/15 CLOSING DATE:
COMMENTS Draft Environmental Impact Statement McCloud Pit Hydroelectric Project (FERC No. 2106) P Applicant: Pacific Gas & Electric Company
COMMENTS Draft Environmental Impact Statement McCloud Pit Hydroelectric Project (FERC No. 2106) P-2106-059 Applicant: Pacific Gas & Electric Company Filed by: FERC Projects Director California Sportfishing
1. Project Title Bull Trout Habitat Restoration Project Identification Assessment. 3. Identification of problem or opportunity to be addressed
PROPOSAL FORM - Lewis River Aquatic Fund 1. Project Title Bull Trout Habitat Restoration Project Identification Assessment 2. Project Manager Adam Haspiel USFS Abi Groskopf Mount S. Helens Institute (MSHI)
7.0 FISH PASSAGE PLANNING AND EVALUATION
7.0 FISH PASSAGE PLANNING AND EVALUATION One of the study elements contained in this section is the Anadromous Fish Passage Modeling. The Habitat Modeling Group, established to guide this study element,
The Blue Heron Slough Conservation Bank
1 The Blue Heron Slough Conservation Bank CONSERVATION BANKING July 19-23, 2010 CASE STUDY SERIES The Blue Heron Slough Conservation Bank (Washington) I. OVERVIEW & BACKGROUND: Location: Snohomish River
Shasta Dam Fish Passage Evaluation. Public Stakeholder Webinar
Shasta Dam Fish Passage Evaluation Public Stakeholder Webinar 9-24-2015 Today s Topics 1. Introduction Craig Moyle (MWH) 2. Project Overview John Hannon (Reclamation) 3. Sacramento River Conditions and
Meeting Minutes FINAL. Aquatic Settlement Work Group. I. Summary of Action Items. To: Aquatic SWG Parties Date: February 15, 2018
To: Aquatic SWG Parties Date: February 15, 2018 From: John Ferguson, Chair (Anchor QEA, LLC) Re: Final Minutes of the Aquatic SWG Meeting The (SWG) met in-person at Wells Dam in Azwell, Washington, on
THREATENED, ENDANGERED, AND SENSITIVE SPECIES 2010 ANNUAL REPORT
LICENSE ARTICLE 410 THREATENED, ENDANGERED, AND SENSITIVE SPECIES 2010 ANNUAL REPORT REPORTING PERIOD JANUARY 1 DECEMBER 31, 2010 BAKER RIVER HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT FERC No. 2150 Puget Sound Energy Bellevue,
Harvest Mgmt. & Fishery Regulations 2017 KATHRYN KONOSKI, FISHERIES BIOLOGIST STILLAGUAMISH TRIBE OF INDIANS
Harvest Mgmt. & Fishery Regulations 2017 KATHRYN KONOSKI, FISHERIES BIOLOGIST STILLAGUAMISH TRIBE OF INDIANS Harvest Management Annual Cycle Egg Alevin Post Season Pre-Season Spawn Adult In-Season Fishery
MEMORANDUM Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife
Attachment 4 MEMORANDUM Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Date: July 19, 2007 To: From: Oregon Fish and Wildlife Commission Steve Williams, Assistant Fish Division Administrator Inland Fisheries Subject:
MEMORANDUM. Joan Dukes, NPCC. Michele DeHart. DATE: August 5, Data Request
FISH PASSAGE CENTER 1827 NE 44 th Ave., Suite 240, Portland, OR 97213 Phone: (503) 230-4099 Fax: (503) 230-7559 http://www.fpc.org/ e-mail us at fpcstaff@fpc.org MEMORANDUM TO: Joan Dukes, NPCC FROM: Michele
PROJECT OVERVIEW PROJECT AREA. FAHCE Fish Habitat Restoration Plan EIR
PROJECT OVERVIEW PROJECT AREA FISH AND AQUATIC HABITAT COLLABORATIVE EFFORT (FAHCE) Fish Habitat Restoration Plan Project Area PROJECT OVERVIEW DOCUMENTS A Settlement Agreement Regarding Water Rights of
Highlights of Native Fish Rehabilitation Activities in the Great Lakes. Presented By: Arunas Liskauskas, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources
Highlights of Native Fish Rehabilitation Activities in the Great Lakes Presented By: Arunas Liskauskas, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources In this presentation Focus on activities from 2002 to 2007
WF4313/6413-Fisheries Management. Class 22
WF4313/6413-Fisheries Management Class 22 Announcements Revised Schedule** November 27 th No lab work on your briefs DRAFT Due 11/30/2018 by 5pm! December 4 th Brief presentations during lab. Final Exam
Recreational Sturgeon Commercial Shad MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES
OREGON AND WASHINGTON DEPARTMENTS OF FISH AND WILDLIFE JOINT STAFF REPORT - SUMMER FACT SHEET NO. 2 Columbia River Compact/Joint State Hearing June 28, 2005 Fisheries under consideration: Recreational
MERWIN UPSTREAM ADULT TRAP EFFICIENCY. Peter M. Stevens Science Operations Manager March 10, 2016
MERWIN UPSTREM DULT TRP EFFICIENCY Peter M. Stevens Science Operations Manager March 10, 2016 Regulatory Background Lewis River quatic Monitoring & Evaluation Plan (PacifiCorp and Cowlitz PUD 2010) The
Lower Clark Fork River Bull Trout Passage Program
Lower Clark Fork River Bull Trout Passage Program Noxon Rapids HED Cabinet Gorge HED Native Salmonid Restoration Plan An examination of five major factors that may influence the success of restoration
Review of Site C Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) - Fish and Fish Habitat
470 Granville Street, Suite 630, Vancouver, BC V6B 1N3 t 604-629-9075 Memorandum Date: December 18, 2013 To: Jesse McCormick Donovan & Company Project: Site C Project From: Palmer Environmental Consulting
Yakima/Klickitat Fisheries Project
Yakima/Klickitat Fisheries Project Lower Yakima River Supplementation and Research Project Operations and Maintenance Annual Report 2002-2003 March 2004 DOE/BP-00006677-1 This Document should be cited
Applied population biology: pacific Salmon
Applied population biology: pacific Salmon Applied population biology: pacific Salmon Topics relevant to salmon conservation Environmental stochasticity Selection vs. Drift Maladaptation Competition Gene
Downstream Migrant Trapping in Russian River Mainstem, Tributaries, and Estuary
Downstream Migrant Trapping in Russian River Mainstem, Tributaries, and Estuary Introduction In September 2008, the National Marine Fisheries Service issued the Russian River Biological Opinion, which