Pedestrian Activity Criteria. PSAC March 8, 2011

Similar documents
Existing Pedestrian Conditions. PSAC February 8, 2011

Methodology for Determining Pedestrian Activity Factors

San Mateo County Comprehensive Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan

Rail Station Fact Sheet University of Dallas Station

Philadelphia Bus Network Choices Report

Overview: Phase 3 Draft Development and Circulation Plans, White Bear Station

Rail Station Fact Sheet Downtown Carrollton Station

Regional Bicycle Barriers Study

I-105 Corridor Sustainability Study (CSS)

Rail Station Fact Sheet CentrePort/DFW Airport Station

Guidelines for Providing Access to Public Transportation Stations APPENDIX C TRANSIT STATION ACCESS PLANNING TOOL INSTRUCTIONS

GARDNER PLAZA AT ST. ROSE St Rose Parkway And Coronado Center, Henderson, NV ,361-21,860 SF OF RETAIL SPACE

Rail Station Fact Sheet DFW Airport North Station* (*station under construction with anticipated start of service in late 2018)

Presentation Summary Why Use GIS for Ped Planning? What Tools are Most Useful? How Can They be Applied? Pedestrian GIS Tools What are they good for?

Pedestrian Project List and Prioritization

Kevin Manaugh Department of Geography McGill School of Environment

2010 Pedestrian and Bicyclist Special Districts Study Update

Agency Advisory Group Meeting #3 and Walk Audit Anchorage Non-Motorized Plan

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... vii 1 STUDY OVERVIEW Study Scope Study Area Study Objectives

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

Urbana Pedestrian Master Plan

NEW SMYRNA BEACH OFFICE

Arterial Transitway Corridors Study. Ave

AMENDING MOTION: Mobility Plan - Pedestrians and Disadvantaged Communities

Is St. Louis Ready for a Bike Share System? May 14, 2014 Public Open House

APPENDIX E BIKEWAY PRIORITIZATION METHODOLOGY

DAYTONA BEACH US1 - OFFICE +10,000 SF

CHAPTER 7.0 IMPLEMENTATION

Rail Station Fact Sheet UNT Dallas Station

Rail Station Fact Sheet CityLine/Bush Station

Pedestrian Demand Modeling: Evaluating Pedestrian Risk Exposures

GIS Based Non-Motorized Transportation Planning APA Ohio Statewide Planning Conference. GIS Assisted Non-Motorized Transportation Planning

REGIONAL SAFETY ADVISORY COMMITTEE North Central Texas Council of Governments Transportation Council Room Friday, October 26, :00 am AGENDA

Community Task Force July 25, 2017

Pocatello Regional Transit Master Transit Plan Draft Recommendations

Rail Station Fact Sheet Downtown Denton Transit Center

Appendix A-K Public Information Centre 2 Materials

City of Davenport CitiBus Public Transportation Study. April 2015

Transportation and Health Tool

LAND FOR SALE SHOVEL-READY SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT LAND. 599 Green Ln, Lemoore, CA PROPERTY FEATURES

Rail Station Fact Sheet Buckner Station

INDIAN ROCK GOLF CLUB

Beyond First First Last Last Mile Strategies. APA National Conference April 3, 2016 Chelsea Richer, AICP Fehr & Peers

Characteristics from these programs were used to compare to and evaluate existing conditions in Howard County.

San Mateo County Comprehensive Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan Open House

Building Community Partnerships for Mobility:

Access BART: TOD and Improved Connections. October 29, 2008

Motorized Transportation Trips, Employer Sponsored Transit Program and Physical Activity

Strategic Plan for Active Mobility Phase I: Bicycle Mobility

Tulsa Metropolitan Area LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN

WALKNBIKE DRAFT PLAN NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE

North Augusta 1215 Knox Avenue, North Augusta, SC 29841

36 APPROVED SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LOTS

ISB CORNER RETAIL BUILDING- DAYTONA BEACH

Summary of NWA Trail Usage Report November 2, 2015

First Mile, Last Mile: Plans for all Shapes and Sizes. Hannah Lindelof, Principal Planner San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit September 18, 2017

Almon Street Bike Lane Planning

Data Analysis February to March Identified safety needs from reported collisions and existing travel patterns.

A Selection Approach for BRT Parking Lots Nicolls Road Corridor Parking Study

2017 Northwest Arkansas Trail Usage Monitoring Report

1999 On-Board Sacramento Regional Transit District Survey

ADOT Statewide Bicycle and Pedestrian Program Summary of Phase IV Activities APPENDIX B PEDESTRIAN DEMAND INDEX

7.04 AC OF LAND VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY

ADA TRANSITION PLAN 2013

Measuring and Communicating Mobility:

Central Jersey Transportation Forum. March 2007

Upper Market Street Bike Lane Project

DRAFT. Memo. Range of the Alternatives Considered in the EIS

CITY OF ALPHARETTA DOWNTOWN MASTER PLAN TRAFFIC EVALUATION

Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority

Anniedale- Tynehead NCP Best Practices in Transportation Planning Summary

The Nevada 1st Congressional District

TULARE COUNTY ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS

Rail Station Fact Sheet North Side Station* (*station under construction with anticipated start of service in late 2018)

Flyaway Bus: GIS Analysis on Current and Potential Ridership, Revenue, and Prospective Stations

City of Birmingham Draft Multi-modal Transportation Plan

TRAFFIC STUDY GUIDELINES Clarksville Street Department

Community Transportation Plan Acknowledgements

Pedestrian injuries in San Francisco: distribution, causes, and solutions

Protected Bike Lanes in San Francisco Mike Sallaberry SFMTA NACTO Workshop - Chicago IL

Regional Bicycle System Master Study. Preliminary Results Update

Dayton Bike Share Feasibility Study

ASSESSING THE WALKING & BIKING ENVIRONMENT

INNER LOOP EAST. AIA Rochester Annual Meeting November 13, 2013 TRANSFORMATION PROJECT. Bret Garwood, NBD Erik Frisch, DES

Gardiner East. Gardiner Expressway & Lake Shore Boulevard Reconfiguration Environmental Assessment & Urban Design Study

Ashby Financial 55 S.F. Units. Ashby Financial 55 S.F. Units MR-27, LLC Unit Proposed

Land Use and Transportation Town Hall September 17, 2018

Pedestrian Safety Workshop SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA

Midtown Corridor Alternatives Analysis

SoundCast Design Intro

Chapter 13 ORANGE COVE

Operationalizing Accessibility

WAUSAU AREA GOLF COURSES

Goal 3: Foster an environment of partnerships and collaboration to connect our communities and regions to one another.

Goals, Objectives, and Policies

ATTACHMENT B OC TRANSIT VISION. Transit Opportunity Corridors Line Evaluation. October Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates Inc.

Telegraph Avenue Complete Streets DRAFT Recommendations. Oakland Public Works Department September 11 and 13, 2014 Open Houses

VISION ZERO: What will it take?

SOUNDCAST CALIBRATION AND SENSITIVITY TEST RESULTS (DRAFT) TABLE OF CONTENTS. Puget Sound Regional Council. Suzanne Childress.

Bike Sharing as Active Transportation

Transcription:

Pedestrian Activity Criteria PSAC March 8, 2011

Contents 1. Project Overview a) Revised schedule of PSAC hearings 2. Pedestrian Activity: Where walking is important a) Existing conditions (revisions based on PSAC comments) b) DRAFT criteria and weighting

Project Overview

Project Purpose The project s goal is to improve walking conditions in San Francisco, and encourage walking as a way of getting around the city. The WalkFirst project will identify where people walk, and prioritize how to make safety improvements to best serve pedestrians. This is important in order to best make use of limited funding.

Project Deliverables Map of key walking streets in San Francisco Method for prioritizing the most important safety improvements Preliminary list of pedestrian safety upgrades Draft policies to guide City decisions about pedestrian safety and walking conditions Examples of street designs to improve the walking environment

Category Pedestrian Activity Pedestrian Safety Project Readiness Goal Identify places where people walk Identify most important locations for safety improvements Identify opportunities to fund and construct pedestrian improvements Product Map of key walking streets in SF Preliminary project list Preliminary project list

Stay involved! Monthly presentations at PSAC Focus groups/stakeholder meetings Take our survey: available online at walkfirst.sfplanning.org Join the mailing list for updates: send an email to walkfirst@sfgov.org

Upcoming PSAC presentations April May Survey results Pedestrian activity: revised criteria/scoring; draft map of key pedestrian streets Pedestrian safety: pedestrian injury maps; pedestrian safety conditions; draft criteria/scoring Pedestrian activity: revised map Pedestrian safety: revised criteria/scoring Project readiness: draft criteria

Pedestrian Activity: Where Walking is Important

Pedestrian Activity: Where Walking is Important Access/need to walk Auto ownership, non-auto mode share, walking mode share Transit ridership Transit network, transit boardings Density of people Residential density, job density, retail density Pedestrian generators Colleges, public schools, hospitals & clinics, shopping districts, parks, tourist destinations Demographics Income, seniors, youth Street slope

Pedestrian Activity: Where Walking is Important - REVISED Access/need to walk Transit mode share, walking mode share Transit ridership Daily transit boardings Density of people Residential density, job density Pedestrian generators Colleges, public schools, hospitals and clinics, shopping districts, parks, tourist destinations, senior centers Vulnerable populations Seniors, youth Income Street slope

Goal: Identify and map key walking streets in San Francisco Step 1: Identify categories of factors that contribute to walking Step 2: Determine how to measure each factor; create a score for each category Step 3: Provide relative weights for each category Step 4: Score each street segment Step 5: Refine based on public input and technical judgment Step 6: Create a map of key walking streets in San Francisco

Goal: Identify and map key walking streets in San Francisco Step 1: Identify categories of factors that contribute to walking Step 2: Determine how to measure each factor; create a score for each category Step 3: Provide relative weights for each category Step 4: Score each street segment Step 5: Refine based on public input and technical judgment Step 6: Create a map of key walking streets in San Francisco

Goal: Identify and map key walking streets in San Francisco Step 1: Identify categories of factors that contribute to walking Step 2: Determine how to measure each factor; create a score for each category Step 3: Provide relative weights for each category Step 4: Score each street segment Step 5: Refine based on public input and technical judgment Step 6: Create a map of key walking streets in San Francisco

Access/need to walk Transit mode share, walking mode share Transit ridership Daily transit boardings Density of people Residential density, job density Pedestrian generators Colleges, public schools, hospitals and clinics, shopping districts, parks, tourist destinations, senior centers Vulnerable populations Seniors, youth Income Street slope

Goal: Identify and map key walking streets in San Francisco Step 1: Identify categories of factors that contribute to walking Step 2: Determine how to measure each factor; create a score for each category Step 3: Provide relative weights for each category Step 4: Score each street segment Step 5: Refine based on public input and technical judgment Step 6: Create a map of key walking streets in San Francisco

Step 2: Determine how to measure each factor; create a score for each category Vulnerable Populations (seniors, youth) # of seniors per census block group # of youth per census block group

Step 2: Determine how to measure each factor; create a score for each category Vulnerable Populations (seniors, youth) # of seniors + # of youth per census block group, ten breaks, applied to street segment

Step 2: Determine how to measure each factor; create a score for each category Access/Need to Walk (public transit to work, walk to work) % take public transit to work % walk to work

Step 2: Determine how to measure each factor; create a score for each category Access/Need to Walk (public transit to work, walk to work) % walk to work + % transit to work, per census block group, ten breaks, applied to street segment

Step 2: Determine how to measure each factor; create a score for each category Density (population, jobs) People per acre Jobs per acre

Step 2: Determine how to measure each factor; create a score for each category Density (population, jobs) # people + # of jobs, per census block group, ten breaks, applied to street segment

Step 2: Determine how to measure each factor; create a score for each category Income median household income, per census block group, ten breaks

Step 2: Determine how to measure each factor; create a score for each category Income median household income, per census block group, ten breaks, applied to street segment

Step 2: Determine how to measure each factor; create a score for each category Street slope Street slope: 0 to 5%, 5 to 10%, > 10%

Step 2: Determine how to measure each factor; create a score for each category Pedestrian Generators (Colleges, public schools, hospitals and clinics, shopping districts, parks, senior centers, tourist destinations) Public Schools: 1/8 and ¼ mile buffers Shopping districts: 1/8 and ¼ mile buffers

Step 2: Determine how to measure each factor; create a score for each category Scale < 1/8 mile < ¼mile Pedestrian Generators Regional (e.g. GG Park) 10 7 District (e.g. Alamo Square) 5 3 Local (e.g. Mission Playground) 2 1

Step 2: Determine how to measure each factor; create a score for each category Pedestrian generators Street segments scored by scale of and proximity to all pedestrian generators, ten breaks

Step 2: Determine how to measure each factor; create a score for each category Transit boardings Transit stops, by # of daily boardings

Step 2: Determine how to measure each factor; create a score for each category Scale < 1/8 mile < ¼mile Transit boardings Regional (based on # of boardings TBD) 10 7 District 5 3 Local 2 1

Goal: Identify and map key walking streets in San Francisco Step 1: Identify categories of factors that contribute to walking Step 2: Determine how to measure each factor; create a score for each category Step 3: Provide relative weights for each category Step 4: Score each street segment Step 5: Refine based on public input and technical judgment Step 6: Create a map of key walking streets in San Francisco

Step 3: Provide relative weights for each category Option 1: All categories given equal weight Option 2: Relative weights determined by paired comparison Option 3: Modified paired comparison; less extreme peaks and valleys

Step 3: Provide relative weights for each category Option 1: All categories given equal weight Option 2: Relative weights determined by paired comparison Option 3: Modified paired comparison; less extreme peaks and valleys Equal weight 16.00% 14.00% 12.00% 10.00% 8.00% 6.00% 4.00% 2.00% 0.00% Access/need to walk Transit boardings Density Pedestrian generators Vulnerable populations Income Slope

Step 3: Provide relative weights for each category Option 1: All categories given equal weight Option 2: Relative weights determined by paired comparison Option 3: Modified paired comparison; less extreme peaks and valleys Paired Comparison 30.00% 25.00% 20.00% 15.00% 10.00% 5.00% 0.00% Access/need to walk Transit boardings Density Pedestrian generators Vulnerable populations Income Slope

Step 3: Provide relative weights for each category Option 1: All categories given equal weight Option 2: Relative weights determined by paired comparison Option 3: Modified paired comparison; less extreme peaks and valleys Less Peaks and Valleys 25.00% 20.00% 15.00% 10.00% 5.00% 0.00% Access/need to walk Transit boardings Density Pedestrian generators Vulnerable populations Income Slope

Paired Comparison Less Peaks and Valleys 30.00% 25.00% 20.00% 15.00% 10.00% 5.00% 0.00% 25.00% 20.00% 15.00% 10.00% 5.00% 0.00% Access/need to walk Transit boardings Density Pedestrian generators Vulnerable populations Income Slope Access/need to walk Transit boardings Density Pedestrian generators Vulnerable populations Income Slope Pedestrian Activity Criteria/Scoring System Equal weight 16.00% 14.00% 12.00% 10.00% 8.00% 6.00% 4.00% 2.00% 0.00% Access/need to walk Transit boardings Density Pedestrian generators Vulnerable populations Income Slope

Goal: Identify and map key walking streets in San Francisco Step 1: Identify categories of factors that contribute to walking Step 2: Determine how to measure each factor; create a score for each category Step 3: Provide relative weights for each category Step 4: Score each street segment Step 5: Refine based on public input and technical judgment Step 6: Create a map of key walking streets in San Francisco

Step 5: Refine based on public input and technical judgment Geographic equity; barriers to walking; future conditions People per acre present; census block group People per acre future (2025 projected); census tract

Thank you!